By©Muhammad Haque
1055 Hrs GMT
1155 Hrs UK
London Saturday 5 April 2008
What AADHIKARonline said at 0655 GMT, is only echoed four hours later and uttered on the BBC Radio 4 in a rare moment of truthfulness.
That the Lib Dumbs in the UK are not being led by a competent let alone coherent leader. It is being led by Clueless Clegg. Clueless is the ‘title’ AADHIKARonline is conferring on confused Clegg for now and now onwards.
Ironically, it had to be the Daily Mail man, Peter Oborne who made the substantive comment about Nick Clegg’s ‘memorable moment with Morgan’, rather than the Daily Mirror place-man, which is what the formerly almost truthful Kevin McGuire must now be known as....
Peter Oborne got it right when he said that the Lib Dems’ Nick Clegg was coming across as being a BAD imitation of David Cameron..............
And even Kevin McGuire said that Clegg's willingness to answer that [Piers Morgan] queston [about the number of Clegg's sexual partners ‘so far’] was reinforcing the view that Clegg was indeed a calamity Leader [of the Lib Dumbs!].
Clegg was equally BAD at posturing in parliament when he exhibited that very immature propensity to dramatics...
He could not carry it off and had to spend the following 48 hours recovering from the damage he had inflicted on himself...
The vast majority of his minority opposition party MPs showed two fingers to him... For them, that was the height of THEIR ‘independence’. Which in itself was a con. THEY were responding to their own ‘needs’ come the next elections in their constituencies...
They could only do that because they got it right, so far as it went, while he looked and acted clueless on the matter of the say on the UK constitution.... in the framework as defined by the European union...
He was pretending to be for democratic say in [and by extension of that implied logic, BY] Parliament when in fact he had no faith [or not sufficiently clear and credible faith] in democracy... His contradictions came instantly back and bit him all over his ‘fresh’ [!] image as ‘the new leader’.
No amount of professed proficiency in languages could hide the message that was getting across and reaching Brussels [a former locale of his alleged achievements] that Clegg was not upto it. Not when it came to leading coherently and constitutionally on and about Europe while serving the cause of much needed democracy in a member country’s ‘sovereign’ [!] Parliament.
That, VERY briefly, is the context in which to look at the disgraceful act of immorality that the Lib Dumbs have perpetrated at the behest of the Blairing Browning agency of Big Business.
The Lib Dumbs were unprepared in january this year when I caught them at it... letting Brian Paddick tell the truth!
Only a bit. But the truth nonetheless.
It was such a rare act that I said I found it astonishing....
And how accurate I was to say that finding a Lib Dumb party candidate telling the truth.. astonishing!
They have now, 3 months it has taken them. ‘corrected’ the situation and have in effect ordered paddick to join the lying machine that the Lib Dumbs have operated on almost all ‘mainstream’ issues.
Poor Paddick! It is like they have rhetorically padlocked his otherwise candid mouth on the crassness of Crossrail!
Padlocking Paddick will not pay the Lib Dumbs at all...
[To be continued]
______________________
By©Muhammad Haque
0655 GMT
London Saturday 5 April 2008
On another Saturday, in january 2008, I had reason to refer to the UK 'mainstream' 'political party' the Lib Dems in the context of our campaign against the Crossrail hole.
I was not convinced, as I wrote then, that their 'party' candidate Brian Paddick, had quite understood how corrupt the Lib Dumbs' party machine was.
Here I am reproducing the main ‘Croydon Guardian’ web site piece on which I commented and the comment itself.
Why today?
Because the Lib Dumbs HAVE made sure to shut Paddick up on Crossrail. As far as Crassrail was concerned, they have belatedly realised, [after counting the numbers of sexual partners that Calamity Clegg has had or rechecking on the moral compass of Sarah T who has displayed such allegedly accurate knowledge despite her mother ‘watching’ Sarah T’s focus on the frequency of sexual contacts between Tony Blair and Cherie Booth!] Paddick must only tell lies, thus making Paddick eat the bit of truth about Crossrail that he had said and the bit that I had found out about.
"
I am writing to put on the record my sense of utter astonishment at coming across a quotation in your item apparently reporting the position on Crossrail as taken by Brian Paddock, one of the candidates at the scheduled 1 May 2008 election for the ‘post of mayor of London’.
You quote him as follows:-
“There's a bias against commuters in south west London. Money going into projects like Crossrail don't benefit them at all," he said.
Did he actually say those words?
I am only asking this because in the period since he has been the declared candidate for the post for the Liberal Democrats, Mr Paddick has not come across as making any similar statement about Crossrail. This is very serious.
Also, when he appeared on the ITV programme ' packaged as a ‘debate’ between the three candidates including Mr Paddick and Boris Johnson and the incumbent Ken Livingstone, Mr Paddick was the one that opted OUT of that segment of the broadcast programme which was dedicated to the issue of CROSSRAIL.
In fact Crossrail was the subject that was shown on the ITV programme to have caused one of the main ‘forceful’ exchanges between Johnson and Livingstone, with Brian Paddick fading out of focus!
So what is the point that he is making in the statement you attribute to him?
Also, he has NOT made any comment similar to the one you report him as having made apparently questioning the cost of Crossrail, about the Crossrail scheme in relation to the main role played by all the ‘ Lib Dem spokespersons’ on transport in London as evident on their records .
Nor did Mr Paddick question the promotion of Crossrail that was sung by Lib Deems MP Susan Kramer at the ‘Third Reading’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as held in the House of Commons on 13 December 2007.
Equally, Mr Paddick has not disowned, on the record and in public the position on Crossrail as exhibited by any of the others in the Lib Dems party who have been part of the parade of the pro-Crossrail lobby over the past four years.
That parade has included the Lib Dem MP Lynne Featherstone who in 2005-2006 was one of the very few MPs that went to the verge of hysteria in denouncing both Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling for their alleged reluctance to provide the public funding for the Crossrail scheme.
Muhammad Haque
Organiser
KHOODEELAAR!
The East London Campaign Against the Crossrail ‘hole plot’ Bill
1545 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 12 January 2008
Quote | Report this post
The CROYDON GUARDIAN web site had carried the piece as follows:
Paddick and Blair make up ahead of election
Exclusive By Dan Menhinnitt
Comment | Read Comments (8)
Lib Dems mayoral candidate Brian Paddick
Mayoral hopeful Brian Paddick says he has buried the hatchet with his old boss Met Commissioner Sir Ian Blair.
Mr Paddick, a former Lambeth borough commander who went to Sutton Manor High School, retired after clashing with Ian Blair over the handling of the Jean Charles de Menezes shooting in July, 2005.
In an exclusive interview with yourlocalguardian.co.uk the 49-year-old says he met with Commissioner Blair recently and the pair are now on good terms.
"I think we are both adult enough that if I was mayor and he Commissioner we could work together," he said.
He added that the meeting went so well Sir Ian dismissed his notetaker.
Speaking at yourlocalguardian.co.uk's Sutton offices he also said south west Londoners can expect an improved and safer transport system if he wins the May election.
advertisement
The Lib Dem candidate said he would end transport policies which only favoured central London and draft in police to tackle teen crime on buses.
"There's a bias against commuters in south west London. Money going into projects like Crossrail don't benefit them at all," he said.
He added: "Some people in the south west are paying much more for journeys under the current zone structure. I want a fair fare for commuters in south west London."
According to Mr Paddick transport priorities would be decided in consultation with local councils and elected officials.
He also said he wanted to see more police officers on bus routes known to suffer from antisocial behaviour, and advocated removing free travel from teen troublemakers.
"I want to take away the right to free travel from those who abuse it rather than a blanket ban on free travel for teens."
And despite the pressures of getting ready to launch his mayoral campaign on Monday he still had time to pop in and visit his 87-year-old mum.
"She lives just round the corner in Sutton. She'd never forgive me if I came to here and didn't pop in and see her," he joked.
Quote | Report this post
Posted by: Muhammad Haque, London UK on 3:47pm Sat 12 Jan 08
quote
I am writing to put on the record my sense of utter astonishment at coming across a quotation in your item apparently reporting the position on Crossrail as taken by Brian Paddock, one of the candidates at the scheduled 1 May 2008 election for the ‘post of mayor of London’.
You quote him as follows:-
“There's a bias against commuters in south west London. Money going into projects like Crossrail don't benefit them at all," he said.
Did he actually say those words?
I am only asking this because in the period since he has been the declared candidate for the post for the Liberal Democrats, Mr Paddick has not come across as making any similar statement about Crossrail. This is very serious.
Also, when he appeared on the ITV programme ' packaged as a ‘debate’ between the three candidates including Mr Paddick and Boris Johnson and the incumbent Ken Livingstone, Mr Paddick was the one that opted OUT of that segment of the broadcast programme which was dedicated to the issue of CROSSRAIL.
In fact Crossrail was the subject that was shown on the ITV programme to have caused one of the main ‘forceful’ exchanges between Johnson and Livingstone, with Brian Paddick fading out of focus!
So what is the point that he is making in the statement you attribute to him?
Also, he has NOT made any comment similar to the one you report him as having made apparently questioning the cost of Crossrail, about the Crossrail scheme in relation to the main role played by all the ‘ Lib Dem spokespersons’ on transport in London as evident on their records .
Nor did Mr Paddick question the promotion of Crossrail that was sung by Lib Deems MP Susan Kramer at the ‘Third Reading’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as held in the House of Commons on 13 December 2007.
Equally, Mr Paddick has not disowned, on the record and in public the position on Crossrail as exhibited by any of the others in the Lib Dems party who have been part of the parade of the pro-Crossrail lobby over the past four years.
That parade has included the Lib Dem MP Lynne Featherstone who in 2005-2006 was one of the very few MPs that went to the verge of hysteria in denouncing both Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling for their alleged reluctance to provide the public funding for the Crossrail scheme.
Muhammad Haque
Organiser
KHOODEELAAR!
The East London Campaign Against the Crossrail ‘hole plot’ Bill
1545 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 12 January 2008
"
Saturday, April 5, 2008
Friday, April 4, 2008
UK Lib Dumbs fail to live with Brian Paddick telling truth against CRASSrail! They shut him up on that !
0735 Hrs GMT O835 Hrs UK London Saturday 5 April 2008:
Khoodeelaar! No to CRASSrailing, unconstitutional, sleazy, corrupting 'mainstream' and SIDEstream' British political parties' 'groupings' CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! About the Lib Dems' 'position' on CRASSrail On January 12 2008 Khoodeelaar! published the comment saying that it was astonishing to note [via Croydon Guardian] that Brian Paddick had made a comment critical of Crossrail....! Now, less than three months on, the Lib Dumbs have returned to their Crossrail-inviting hole of political irrelevance and collusion with Big business and the assortments of sleazeballs that parade as political representatives in the UK 'democracy. UK DUMMOCRACY, more like... .....As the Lib Dumbs keep showing themselves to be part of and party [in both senses] to....
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
0655 GMT
London Saturday 5 April 2008
On another Saturday, in january 2008, I had reason to refer to the UK 'mainstream' 'political party' the Lib Dems in the context of our campaign against the Crossrail hole.
I was not convinced, as I wrote then, that their 'party' candidate Brian Paddick, had quite understood how corrupt the Lib Dumbs' party machine was.
Here I am reproducing the main ‘Croydon Guardian’ web site piece on which I commented and the comment itself.
Why today?
Because the Lib Dumbs HAVE made sure to shut Paddick up on Crossrail. As far as Crassrail was concerned, they have belatedly realised, [after counting the numbers of sexual partners that Calamity Clegg has had or rechecking on the moral compass of Sarah T who has displayed such allegedly accurate knowledge despite her mother ‘watching’ Sarah T’s focus] about the frequency of sexual contacts between Tony Blair and Cherie Booth!] Paddick must only tell lies, thus making Paddick eat the bit of truth about Crossrail that he had said and the bit that I had found out about.
"
I am writing to put on the record my sense of utter astonishment at coming across a quotation in your item apparently reporting the position on Crossrail as taken by Brian Paddock, one of the candidates at the scheduled 1 May 2008 election for the ‘post of mayor of London’.
You quote him as follows:-
“There's a bias against commuters in south west London. Money going into projects like Crossrail don't benefit them at all," he said.
Did he actually say those words?
I am only asking this because in the period since he has been the declared candidate for the post for the Liberal Democrats, Mr Paddick has not come across as making any similar statement about Crossrail. This is very serious.
Also, when he appeared on the ITV programme ' packaged as a ‘debate’ between the three candidates including Mr Paddick and Boris Johnson and the incumbent Ken Livingstone, Mr Paddick was the one that opted OUT of that segment of the broadcast programme which was dedicated to the issue of CROSSRAIL.
In fact Crossrail was the subject that was shown on the ITV programme to have caused one of the main ‘forceful’ exchanges between Johnson and Livingstone, with Brian Paddick fading out of focus!
So what is the point that he is making in the statement you attribute to him?
Also, he has NOT made any comment similar to the one you report him as having made apparently questioning the cost of Crossrail, about the Crossrail scheme in relation to the main role played by all the ‘ Lib Dem spokespersons’ on transport in London as evident on their records .
Nor did Mr Paddick question the promotion of Crossrail that was sung by Lib Deems MP Susan Kramer at the ‘Third Reading’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as held in the House of Commons on 13 December 2007.
Equally, Mr Paddick has not disowned, on the record and in public the position on Crossrail as exhibited by any of the others in the Lib Dems party who have been part of the parade of the pro-Crossrail lobby over the past four years.
That parade has included the Lib Dem MP Lynne Featherstone who in 2005-2006 was one of the very few MPs that went to the verge of hysteria in denouncing both Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling for their alleged reluctance to provide the public funding for the Crossrail scheme.
Muhammad Haque
Organiser
KHOODEELAAR!
The East London Campaign Against the Crossrail ‘hole plot’ Bill
1545 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 12 January 2008
Quote | Report this post
The CROYDON GUARDIAN web site had carried the piece as follows:
Paddick and Blair make up ahead of election
Exclusive By Dan Menhinnitt
Comment | Read Comments (8)
Lib Dems mayoral candidate Brian Paddick
Mayoral hopeful Brian Paddick says he has buried the hatchet with his old boss Met Commissioner Sir Ian Blair.
Mr Paddick, a former Lambeth borough commander who went to Sutton Manor High School, retired after clashing with Ian Blair over the handling of the Jean Charles de Menezes shooting in July, 2005.
In an exclusive interview with yourlocalguardian.co.uk the 49-year-old says he met with Commissioner Blair recently and the pair are now on good terms.
"I think we are both adult enough that if I was mayor and he Commissioner we could work together," he said.
He added that the meeting went so well Sir Ian dismissed his notetaker.
Speaking at yourlocalguardian.co.uk's Sutton offices he also said south west Londoners can expect an improved and safer transport system if he wins the May election.
advertisement
The Lib Dem candidate said he would end transport policies which only favoured central London and draft in police to tackle teen crime on buses.
"There's a bias against commuters in south west London. Money going into projects like Crossrail don't benefit them at all," he said.
He added: "Some people in the south west are paying much more for journeys under the current zone structure. I want a fair fare for commuters in south west London."
According to Mr Paddick transport priorities would be decided in consultation with local councils and elected officials.
He also said he wanted to see more police officers on bus routes known to suffer from antisocial behaviour, and advocated removing free travel from teen troublemakers.
"I want to take away the right to free travel from those who abuse it rather than a blanket ban on free travel for teens."
And despite the pressures of getting ready to launch his mayoral campaign on Monday he still had time to pop in and visit his 87-year-old mum.
"She lives just round the corner in Sutton. She'd never forgive me if I came to here and didn't pop in and see her," he joked.
Quote | Report this post
Posted by: Muhammad Haque, London UK on 3:47pm Sat 12 Jan 08
quote
I am writing to put on the record my sense of utter astonishment at coming across a quotation in your item apparently reporting the position on Crossrail as taken by Brian Paddock, one of the candidates at the scheduled 1 May 2008 election for the ‘post of mayor of London’.
You quote him as follows:-
“There's a bias against commuters in south west London. Money going into projects like Crossrail don't benefit them at all," he said.
Did he actually say those words?
I am only asking this because in the period since he has been the declared candidate for the post for the Liberal Democrats, Mr Paddick has not come across as making any similar statement about Crossrail. This is very serious.
Also, when he appeared on the ITV programme ' packaged as a ‘debate’ between the three candidates including Mr Paddick and Boris Johnson and the incumbent Ken Livingstone, Mr Paddick was the one that opted OUT of that segment of the broadcast programme which was dedicated to the issue of CROSSRAIL.
In fact Crossrail was the subject that was shown on the ITV programme to have caused one of the main ‘forceful’ exchanges between Johnson and Livingstone, with Brian Paddick fading out of focus!
So what is the point that he is making in the statement you attribute to him?
Also, he has NOT made any comment similar to the one you report him as having made apparently questioning the cost of Crossrail, about the Crossrail scheme in relation to the main role played by all the ‘ Lib Dem spokespersons’ on transport in London as evident on their records .
Nor did Mr Paddick question the promotion of Crossrail that was sung by Lib Deems MP Susan Kramer at the ‘Third Reading’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as held in the House of Commons on 13 December 2007.
Equally, Mr Paddick has not disowned, on the record and in public the position on Crossrail as exhibited by any of the others in the Lib Dems party who have been part of the parade of the pro-Crossrail lobby over the past four years.
That parade has included the Lib Dem MP Lynne Featherstone who in 2005-2006 was one of the very few MPs that went to the verge of hysteria in denouncing both Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling for their alleged reluctance to provide the public funding for the Crossrail scheme.
Muhammad Haque
Organiser
KHOODEELAAR!
The East London Campaign Against the Crossrail ‘hole plot’ Bill
1545 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 12 January 2008
"
Khoodeelaar! No to CRASSrailing, unconstitutional, sleazy, corrupting 'mainstream' and SIDEstream' British political parties' 'groupings' CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! About the Lib Dems' 'position' on CRASSrail On January 12 2008 Khoodeelaar! published the comment saying that it was astonishing to note [via Croydon Guardian] that Brian Paddick had made a comment critical of Crossrail....! Now, less than three months on, the Lib Dumbs have returned to their Crossrail-inviting hole of political irrelevance and collusion with Big business and the assortments of sleazeballs that parade as political representatives in the UK 'democracy. UK DUMMOCRACY, more like... .....As the Lib Dumbs keep showing themselves to be part of and party [in both senses] to....
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
0655 GMT
London Saturday 5 April 2008
On another Saturday, in january 2008, I had reason to refer to the UK 'mainstream' 'political party' the Lib Dems in the context of our campaign against the Crossrail hole.
I was not convinced, as I wrote then, that their 'party' candidate Brian Paddick, had quite understood how corrupt the Lib Dumbs' party machine was.
Here I am reproducing the main ‘Croydon Guardian’ web site piece on which I commented and the comment itself.
Why today?
Because the Lib Dumbs HAVE made sure to shut Paddick up on Crossrail. As far as Crassrail was concerned, they have belatedly realised, [after counting the numbers of sexual partners that Calamity Clegg has had or rechecking on the moral compass of Sarah T who has displayed such allegedly accurate knowledge despite her mother ‘watching’ Sarah T’s focus] about the frequency of sexual contacts between Tony Blair and Cherie Booth!] Paddick must only tell lies, thus making Paddick eat the bit of truth about Crossrail that he had said and the bit that I had found out about.
"
I am writing to put on the record my sense of utter astonishment at coming across a quotation in your item apparently reporting the position on Crossrail as taken by Brian Paddock, one of the candidates at the scheduled 1 May 2008 election for the ‘post of mayor of London’.
You quote him as follows:-
“There's a bias against commuters in south west London. Money going into projects like Crossrail don't benefit them at all," he said.
Did he actually say those words?
I am only asking this because in the period since he has been the declared candidate for the post for the Liberal Democrats, Mr Paddick has not come across as making any similar statement about Crossrail. This is very serious.
Also, when he appeared on the ITV programme ' packaged as a ‘debate’ between the three candidates including Mr Paddick and Boris Johnson and the incumbent Ken Livingstone, Mr Paddick was the one that opted OUT of that segment of the broadcast programme which was dedicated to the issue of CROSSRAIL.
In fact Crossrail was the subject that was shown on the ITV programme to have caused one of the main ‘forceful’ exchanges between Johnson and Livingstone, with Brian Paddick fading out of focus!
So what is the point that he is making in the statement you attribute to him?
Also, he has NOT made any comment similar to the one you report him as having made apparently questioning the cost of Crossrail, about the Crossrail scheme in relation to the main role played by all the ‘ Lib Dem spokespersons’ on transport in London as evident on their records .
Nor did Mr Paddick question the promotion of Crossrail that was sung by Lib Deems MP Susan Kramer at the ‘Third Reading’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as held in the House of Commons on 13 December 2007.
Equally, Mr Paddick has not disowned, on the record and in public the position on Crossrail as exhibited by any of the others in the Lib Dems party who have been part of the parade of the pro-Crossrail lobby over the past four years.
That parade has included the Lib Dem MP Lynne Featherstone who in 2005-2006 was one of the very few MPs that went to the verge of hysteria in denouncing both Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling for their alleged reluctance to provide the public funding for the Crossrail scheme.
Muhammad Haque
Organiser
KHOODEELAAR!
The East London Campaign Against the Crossrail ‘hole plot’ Bill
1545 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 12 January 2008
Quote | Report this post
The CROYDON GUARDIAN web site had carried the piece as follows:
Paddick and Blair make up ahead of election
Exclusive By Dan Menhinnitt
Comment | Read Comments (8)
Lib Dems mayoral candidate Brian Paddick
Mayoral hopeful Brian Paddick says he has buried the hatchet with his old boss Met Commissioner Sir Ian Blair.
Mr Paddick, a former Lambeth borough commander who went to Sutton Manor High School, retired after clashing with Ian Blair over the handling of the Jean Charles de Menezes shooting in July, 2005.
In an exclusive interview with yourlocalguardian.co.uk the 49-year-old says he met with Commissioner Blair recently and the pair are now on good terms.
"I think we are both adult enough that if I was mayor and he Commissioner we could work together," he said.
He added that the meeting went so well Sir Ian dismissed his notetaker.
Speaking at yourlocalguardian.co.uk's Sutton offices he also said south west Londoners can expect an improved and safer transport system if he wins the May election.
advertisement
The Lib Dem candidate said he would end transport policies which only favoured central London and draft in police to tackle teen crime on buses.
"There's a bias against commuters in south west London. Money going into projects like Crossrail don't benefit them at all," he said.
He added: "Some people in the south west are paying much more for journeys under the current zone structure. I want a fair fare for commuters in south west London."
According to Mr Paddick transport priorities would be decided in consultation with local councils and elected officials.
He also said he wanted to see more police officers on bus routes known to suffer from antisocial behaviour, and advocated removing free travel from teen troublemakers.
"I want to take away the right to free travel from those who abuse it rather than a blanket ban on free travel for teens."
And despite the pressures of getting ready to launch his mayoral campaign on Monday he still had time to pop in and visit his 87-year-old mum.
"She lives just round the corner in Sutton. She'd never forgive me if I came to here and didn't pop in and see her," he joked.
Quote | Report this post
Posted by: Muhammad Haque, London UK on 3:47pm Sat 12 Jan 08
quote
I am writing to put on the record my sense of utter astonishment at coming across a quotation in your item apparently reporting the position on Crossrail as taken by Brian Paddock, one of the candidates at the scheduled 1 May 2008 election for the ‘post of mayor of London’.
You quote him as follows:-
“There's a bias against commuters in south west London. Money going into projects like Crossrail don't benefit them at all," he said.
Did he actually say those words?
I am only asking this because in the period since he has been the declared candidate for the post for the Liberal Democrats, Mr Paddick has not come across as making any similar statement about Crossrail. This is very serious.
Also, when he appeared on the ITV programme ' packaged as a ‘debate’ between the three candidates including Mr Paddick and Boris Johnson and the incumbent Ken Livingstone, Mr Paddick was the one that opted OUT of that segment of the broadcast programme which was dedicated to the issue of CROSSRAIL.
In fact Crossrail was the subject that was shown on the ITV programme to have caused one of the main ‘forceful’ exchanges between Johnson and Livingstone, with Brian Paddick fading out of focus!
So what is the point that he is making in the statement you attribute to him?
Also, he has NOT made any comment similar to the one you report him as having made apparently questioning the cost of Crossrail, about the Crossrail scheme in relation to the main role played by all the ‘ Lib Dem spokespersons’ on transport in London as evident on their records .
Nor did Mr Paddick question the promotion of Crossrail that was sung by Lib Deems MP Susan Kramer at the ‘Third Reading’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as held in the House of Commons on 13 December 2007.
Equally, Mr Paddick has not disowned, on the record and in public the position on Crossrail as exhibited by any of the others in the Lib Dems party who have been part of the parade of the pro-Crossrail lobby over the past four years.
That parade has included the Lib Dem MP Lynne Featherstone who in 2005-2006 was one of the very few MPs that went to the verge of hysteria in denouncing both Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling for their alleged reluctance to provide the public funding for the Crossrail scheme.
Muhammad Haque
Organiser
KHOODEELAAR!
The East London Campaign Against the Crossrail ‘hole plot’ Bill
1545 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 12 January 2008
"
Slipperal Democrats can't stand it when 'their' 'London mayor' candidate Paddick told the truth about Calamity Crossrail!
0210 Hrs GMT 0310 Hrs UK London Saturday 5 April 2008:KHOODEELAAR! Told you so!
The Lib Dumbs! have confirmed the accurate doubt Khoodeelaar! had expressed about Brian Paddick’s flash of truthfulness on calamity CRASSrail…
It seems that after TWO occasions of telling the truth about Crossrail, Paddick has been reined in by the calamitous Clegg regime… to be consigned to the role of being yet another sleaze-ball candidate to serve the interest of Big Business and assortments of sleazy politicians…
Paddick no longer can make even a small note to history in the representation of the people of and in London….
On with the campaign against ALL the touts posing as candidate for the trust of the people of and in London….
[To be continued]
The Lib Dumbs! have confirmed the accurate doubt Khoodeelaar! had expressed about Brian Paddick’s flash of truthfulness on calamity CRASSrail…
It seems that after TWO occasions of telling the truth about Crossrail, Paddick has been reined in by the calamitous Clegg regime… to be consigned to the role of being yet another sleaze-ball candidate to serve the interest of Big Business and assortments of sleazy politicians…
Paddick no longer can make even a small note to history in the representation of the people of and in London….
On with the campaign against ALL the touts posing as candidate for the trust of the people of and in London….
[To be continued]
The crassly conceived, seriously flawed CROSSRAIl scam is intellectually stalled....Yet Ken Livingstone hyped it wildly..Why??
Editor©Muhammad Haque
Crossrail crassness shown in con Livingstone's crafty silence on world class crash closing in on the capitalist market square mile misleadingly and corruptingly called the City of London...[it is not the London Town or the Metropolitan city of London, which is the bigger picture of London.
The ‘city of London’ is a small part situated within one square mile as they saying goes, sandwiched between the bigger borough called the City of Westminster to the west south, by the borough of Islington to the north, and the boroughs of Hackney and Tower Hamlets to the north east and to the east.
It is this tiny bit of London called the ‘City of London’ where the main practices of capitalist corruption and offences and plots against democracy take place under covers of financial trade and services]
Ken Livingstone has been colluding with the City of London interests for his own career.
It has been one of the key reasons why Livingstone has served as the chief propaganda tout for CRASSrail.
Because the City of London is made up of Big business agencies who want to get their hands on £Billions of public cash... That is why they have been parading Livingstone as, in their cynical language, the ‘lefty they could do business with’. And what a successful track record of business dealings they have created by employing Livingstone s their mouthpiece.
And Gerald Ronson is not by any means the only property speculating user of Ken Livingstone's ‘socialist loyalty’ in gaining planning consents for multi-£1MILLION scams located in the City of London ....
AND in the CRASS role player con Livingstone's silence on persistent failures by ALL the inner city ‘state’ schools where the majority of the failed, let down and dis-schooled youngsters are to be found in parts that Big Business have targeted for takeover under Crossrail agenda and similar pretexts.
[To be continued]
Crossrail crassness shown in con Livingstone's crafty silence on world class crash closing in on the capitalist market square mile misleadingly and corruptingly called the City of London...[it is not the London Town or the Metropolitan city of London, which is the bigger picture of London.
The ‘city of London’ is a small part situated within one square mile as they saying goes, sandwiched between the bigger borough called the City of Westminster to the west south, by the borough of Islington to the north, and the boroughs of Hackney and Tower Hamlets to the north east and to the east.
It is this tiny bit of London called the ‘City of London’ where the main practices of capitalist corruption and offences and plots against democracy take place under covers of financial trade and services]
Ken Livingstone has been colluding with the City of London interests for his own career.
It has been one of the key reasons why Livingstone has served as the chief propaganda tout for CRASSrail.
Because the City of London is made up of Big business agencies who want to get their hands on £Billions of public cash... That is why they have been parading Livingstone as, in their cynical language, the ‘lefty they could do business with’. And what a successful track record of business dealings they have created by employing Livingstone s their mouthpiece.
And Gerald Ronson is not by any means the only property speculating user of Ken Livingstone's ‘socialist loyalty’ in gaining planning consents for multi-£1MILLION scams located in the City of London ....
AND in the CRASS role player con Livingstone's silence on persistent failures by ALL the inner city ‘state’ schools where the majority of the failed, let down and dis-schooled youngsters are to be found in parts that Big Business have targeted for takeover under Crossrail agenda and similar pretexts.
[To be continued]
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
Crossrail hole plot is a Big Business scam to rob UK public of £Billions.. BBC News 24 flaunts 'Big' empty names under a cover of 'press review'...
By©Muhammad Haque
0455 Hrs GMT
London Thursday 3 April 2008
How the BBC News 24 rubbishes the truth under any excuse that it can find - the idiocies paraded as a Rees-Mogg 'contribution' to concealing the truth
The BBC’s News24 is far less than 24 hours long. It is deception in itself. In name. In content and in the scope of the truth that it lets viewers [and listeners] to access via its ‘24/7’ relay of recycling rubbish
As has been shown again, around midnight GMT into Thursday 3 April 2008.
They had the token reviewer of the day’s front pages [and some token inside pages] . This one was called a female Rees-Mogg. They did not say outright if this Rees-Mogg was related to [possibly a daughter of] the Rupert Murdoched Rees-Mogg [the William Rees Mogg]. But they need not have done so, as she was obviously of the same political line as the other Rees Mogg.
But she came across as just empty and banal as any of David Ca-Moron’s peddling ppc could be.
PPC!
Parasitic Parliamentary careerist
Or Prospective Parliamentary careerist
She was guided by News24 slot fronter Chris Ekin to utter about the day’s front page item as displayed on the Guardian ['Livingstone v Johnson']. She said nothing. She suggested nothing. She cam,e across as knowing nothing. About the subject under reference . that of the needs, the priorities and the problems facing the people in and of London.
She knew one thing. 'Big'! She said it a few items. 'Big'!
Boris was 'Big'.
Ken was 'Big'.
Whatever could she mean by that?
And however could she know what their sizes really were?
She was of course fascinated by their 'Big' names!
However could she tell?
No wonder she is going to be elected a new MP whenever the Ca-Moron 'Conservative-leaning' poll may take place, at today's’ indications!
[To be continued]
0455 Hrs GMT
London Thursday 3 April 2008
How the BBC News 24 rubbishes the truth under any excuse that it can find - the idiocies paraded as a Rees-Mogg 'contribution' to concealing the truth
The BBC’s News24 is far less than 24 hours long. It is deception in itself. In name. In content and in the scope of the truth that it lets viewers [and listeners] to access via its ‘24/7’ relay of recycling rubbish
As has been shown again, around midnight GMT into Thursday 3 April 2008.
They had the token reviewer of the day’s front pages [and some token inside pages] . This one was called a female Rees-Mogg. They did not say outright if this Rees-Mogg was related to [possibly a daughter of] the Rupert Murdoched Rees-Mogg [the William Rees Mogg]. But they need not have done so, as she was obviously of the same political line as the other Rees Mogg.
But she came across as just empty and banal as any of David Ca-Moron’s peddling ppc could be.
PPC!
Parasitic Parliamentary careerist
Or Prospective Parliamentary careerist
She was guided by News24 slot fronter Chris Ekin to utter about the day’s front page item as displayed on the Guardian ['Livingstone v Johnson']. She said nothing. She suggested nothing. She cam,e across as knowing nothing. About the subject under reference . that of the needs, the priorities and the problems facing the people in and of London.
She knew one thing. 'Big'! She said it a few items. 'Big'!
Boris was 'Big'.
Ken was 'Big'.
Whatever could she mean by that?
And however could she know what their sizes really were?
She was of course fascinated by their 'Big' names!
However could she tell?
No wonder she is going to be elected a new MP whenever the Ca-Moron 'Conservative-leaning' poll may take place, at today's’ indications!
[To be continued]
Muhammad Haque comments at 0335 Hrs GMT Thursday 3 April 2008 on the Guardian front page item on ‘Johnson and Livingstone’
Muhammad Haque comments at 0335 Hrs GMT Thursday 3 April 2008 on the Guardian front page item about ‘Johnson and Livingstone’
It was the desperately corrupting Guardian that allowed the antidemocratic, stooging, forces to carry a huge lying scare story to shield Livingstone's hold on power as the ‘Undone mayor’ in the name of London, by [the Guardian colluding with Living stone and] hauling in the mother of Stephen Lawrence, the black youth who had been murdered by racists in April 1993 in South East London
It was the lying, corrupting Guardian that has since published a plethora of fabricating stalling shielding pieces defying the truth, concealing the truth about the disastrous failures of Ken Lyingstill Livingstone... It was the Guardian's JOHN CARVEL in the 1980s who had joined the even then corrupting careerist bandwagon of Ken Livingstone by lauding him in words and on bases that the facts did not justify.... It is therefore the Guardian that has much more to answer for the liability that the ordinary people have been lumbered with by there being a huge corrupting entourage created by and carried by the corrupter of London.,. Ken Livinvgstone ... Whatever the 'result' of the scheduled 1 May 2008 'mayor election', the chances are slim that the Guardian will turn into a newspaper that tells the truth... And without newspapers telling the truth, ordinary people have no way of finding out the truth about what goes on in the corridors of power ... corridors that are furnished and occupied in the name of the people....The 'Trust' that the Guardian boasts of being 'run by' should be scrapped... juts like VCRossrail which the lying Guardian has been promoting and peddling..........
[To be continued]
It was the desperately corrupting Guardian that allowed the antidemocratic, stooging, forces to carry a huge lying scare story to shield Livingstone's hold on power as the ‘Undone mayor’ in the name of London, by [the Guardian colluding with Living stone and] hauling in the mother of Stephen Lawrence, the black youth who had been murdered by racists in April 1993 in South East London
It was the lying, corrupting Guardian that has since published a plethora of fabricating stalling shielding pieces defying the truth, concealing the truth about the disastrous failures of Ken Lyingstill Livingstone... It was the Guardian's JOHN CARVEL in the 1980s who had joined the even then corrupting careerist bandwagon of Ken Livingstone by lauding him in words and on bases that the facts did not justify.... It is therefore the Guardian that has much more to answer for the liability that the ordinary people have been lumbered with by there being a huge corrupting entourage created by and carried by the corrupter of London.,. Ken Livinvgstone ... Whatever the 'result' of the scheduled 1 May 2008 'mayor election', the chances are slim that the Guardian will turn into a newspaper that tells the truth... And without newspapers telling the truth, ordinary people have no way of finding out the truth about what goes on in the corridors of power ... corridors that are furnished and occupied in the name of the people....The 'Trust' that the Guardian boasts of being 'run by' should be scrapped... juts like VCRossrail which the lying Guardian has been promoting and peddling..........
[To be continued]
ACTION Archive against Crossrail hole plotter Ken Livingstone...What Khoodeelaar! said on 3 September 2007 about Boris Johnson
"Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against Crossrail hole Bill” OPPOSES Ken Lyingstill Livingstone precisely because Livingstone has been abusing public resources in promoting the con that is the present Crossrail as it is in the 'Crossrail Bill'.
We would support any candidate who has the integrity to tell the truth and to do so by genuinely recognising the people of London.
What Livingstone has done is to corrupt London and to do so with the assistance of the likes of the Guardian who mounted that very sinister propaganda onslaught on Boris Johnson. We still don't know how Boris Johnson will deal with the serious crisis that exists in providing transport in London. Does Boris Johnson have the patience to actually read the many alternatives to Crossrail that people with long experience and commitment have pointed out? Does he have the democratic interests to question the deadpan and the totally unaccountable, unrigorous, unscrutinising ‘Crossrail Bill’ 'Select committee' of MPs ['chaired' by Alan Meale] which has been doing a pathetic job of 'scrutinising’ the Bill.
That committee has been preventing people with serious and relevant objections to the contents and the implications of the Crossrail Bill from bringing in evidence to support the objections. Does Boris have the sense of fair play and tolerance in him to show the way out of the racist morass that clouds any frustrated seeker of public office? Boris may hold views that are far to the right of Ken Livingstone, circa 1981.
Ken Livingstone circa 2006 has been far worse for democracy and accountable occupation of public office than anything London deserves. We welcome what appears to be the beginning of an almost pro-democratic debate about the future of the politicos seeking our votes. Let the people of London have a full-scale expression of our thoughts, our wisdom and our rights and responsibilities...”
http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnews/Boris.johnson03092007.html
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The intellectually stalled CRASSrail scam 'to be rescued' by 'lobbyist' Michael Portillo! CRASSrail hits the buffers!!!??? More, here, soon
1940 Hrs GMT
Weds 2 April 2008
The Muhammad Haque commentary on Michael Portillo being used by Big Business pushers of the intellectually stalled ‘Crossrail hole ‘ scam, and a first comment on the ''Time Out' 'Debase' [that is supposedly still taking place at the University of London union at Malet Street In London west central] on the 'Undone mayor' [OOOOps! the 1 May 2008 ‘election’ of the ‘mayor ‘ in the name of London] - here, later in the evening
We would support any candidate who has the integrity to tell the truth and to do so by genuinely recognising the people of London.
What Livingstone has done is to corrupt London and to do so with the assistance of the likes of the Guardian who mounted that very sinister propaganda onslaught on Boris Johnson. We still don't know how Boris Johnson will deal with the serious crisis that exists in providing transport in London. Does Boris Johnson have the patience to actually read the many alternatives to Crossrail that people with long experience and commitment have pointed out? Does he have the democratic interests to question the deadpan and the totally unaccountable, unrigorous, unscrutinising ‘Crossrail Bill’ 'Select committee' of MPs ['chaired' by Alan Meale] which has been doing a pathetic job of 'scrutinising’ the Bill.
That committee has been preventing people with serious and relevant objections to the contents and the implications of the Crossrail Bill from bringing in evidence to support the objections. Does Boris have the sense of fair play and tolerance in him to show the way out of the racist morass that clouds any frustrated seeker of public office? Boris may hold views that are far to the right of Ken Livingstone, circa 1981.
Ken Livingstone circa 2006 has been far worse for democracy and accountable occupation of public office than anything London deserves. We welcome what appears to be the beginning of an almost pro-democratic debate about the future of the politicos seeking our votes. Let the people of London have a full-scale expression of our thoughts, our wisdom and our rights and responsibilities...”
http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnews/Boris.johnson03092007.html
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The intellectually stalled CRASSrail scam 'to be rescued' by 'lobbyist' Michael Portillo! CRASSrail hits the buffers!!!??? More, here, soon
1940 Hrs GMT
Weds 2 April 2008
The Muhammad Haque commentary on Michael Portillo being used by Big Business pushers of the intellectually stalled ‘Crossrail hole ‘ scam, and a first comment on the ''Time Out' 'Debase' [that is supposedly still taking place at the University of London union at Malet Street In London west central] on the 'Undone mayor' [OOOOps! the 1 May 2008 ‘election’ of the ‘mayor ‘ in the name of London] - here, later in the evening
Friday, March 28, 2008
Why did C4 News [27.03.2008] utter the lie that 'Canary Wharf' 'dazzled' as compared to Bling Bling's alleged Paris? - Muhammad Haque commentary, soon
If Brown is a walking disaster, as Quentin Lettes says he is becoming, then surely the 'commitment' of £Billions of UK public money to a shady , crass plot as the Crossrail hole scam, should be included in the list of disastrous decisions that Brown can be said to have made?
Will the Daily mail go so far and admit it?
[To be continued]
___________________________________________________________________________
Big Business corruption ploy via Crossrail Bill - the ploy is active now in further corrupting the 'British parliament'
The corruption of the british parliament is again on view in the ‘palace of westminster’. this time it is visible in the scripted performance of the 'crossrail hole bill' 'select committee' in the uk 'upper' [=lower!!!!!!] chamber.
we begin by examining the evidence. Here, next.
___________________________________________________________________________
The London Crossrail hole plot is a Big Business scam, a pretext to loot £Billions of public money. It is not about meeting genuine demand....
0600 Hrs GMT Thurs 27.03.2008
This is seen in the behaviour of the bureaucracy that has been put in place to 'treat' , that is to stage the formal 'work' of the 'House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee'.
The Select Committee so far has behaved just as its counterpart in the House of Commons did two years earlier.
Parrot-like, the crucial parts of the staged proceedings mirror the agenda as contained in the scripts of the secret promoters of the Big Business scam called Crossrail.
[To be continued]
Will the Daily mail go so far and admit it?
[To be continued]
___________________________________________________________________________
Big Business corruption ploy via Crossrail Bill - the ploy is active now in further corrupting the 'British parliament'
The corruption of the british parliament is again on view in the ‘palace of westminster’. this time it is visible in the scripted performance of the 'crossrail hole bill' 'select committee' in the uk 'upper' [=lower!!!!!!] chamber.
we begin by examining the evidence. Here, next.
___________________________________________________________________________
The London Crossrail hole plot is a Big Business scam, a pretext to loot £Billions of public money. It is not about meeting genuine demand....
0600 Hrs GMT Thurs 27.03.2008
This is seen in the behaviour of the bureaucracy that has been put in place to 'treat' , that is to stage the formal 'work' of the 'House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee'.
The Select Committee so far has behaved just as its counterpart in the House of Commons did two years earlier.
Parrot-like, the crucial parts of the staged proceedings mirror the agenda as contained in the scripts of the secret promoters of the Big Business scam called Crossrail.
[To be continued]
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
Big Business corruption ploy via Crossrail Bill - the ploy is active now in further corrupting the 'British parliament'
The corruption of the british parliament is again on view in the ‘palace of westminster’. this time it is visible in the scripted performance of the 'crossrail hole bill' 'select committee' in the uk 'upper' [=lower!!!!!!] chamber.
we begin by examining the evidence. Here, next.
____________________________________________________________________________
The London Crossrail hole plot is a Big Business scam, a pretext to loot £Billions of public money. It is not about meeting genuine demand....
0600 Hrs GMT THurs 27.03.2008
This is seen in the behaviour of the bureaucracy that has been put in place to 'treat' , that is to stage the formal 'work' of the 'House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee'.
The Select Committee so far has behaved just as its counterpart in the House of Commons did two years earlier.
Parrot-like, the crucial parts of the staged proceedings mirror the agenda as contained in the scripts of the secret promoters of the Big Business scam called Crossrail.
[To be continued]
we begin by examining the evidence. Here, next.
____________________________________________________________________________
The London Crossrail hole plot is a Big Business scam, a pretext to loot £Billions of public money. It is not about meeting genuine demand....
0600 Hrs GMT THurs 27.03.2008
This is seen in the behaviour of the bureaucracy that has been put in place to 'treat' , that is to stage the formal 'work' of the 'House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee'.
The Select Committee so far has behaved just as its counterpart in the House of Commons did two years earlier.
Parrot-like, the crucial parts of the staged proceedings mirror the agenda as contained in the scripts of the secret promoters of the Big Business scam called Crossrail.
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN this week spelling out the details of how Big Business has sabotaged the UK Parliament -
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN this week spelling out the details of how Big Business has sabotaged the UK Parliament - as is seen in the scripted conduct of stooge 'parliamentarians'
This is seen in the behaviour of the bureaucracy that ahs been put in lace to 'treat' , that is to stage the formal 'work' of the 'House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee'.
The Select Committee so far has behaved just as its counterpart in the House of Commons did two years earlier.
Parrot-like, the crucial parts of the staged proceedings mirror the agenda as contained in the scripts of the secret promoters of the Big Business scam called Crossrail.
[To be continued]
This is seen in the behaviour of the bureaucracy that ahs been put in lace to 'treat' , that is to stage the formal 'work' of the 'House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee'.
The Select Committee so far has behaved just as its counterpart in the House of Commons did two years earlier.
Parrot-like, the crucial parts of the staged proceedings mirror the agenda as contained in the scripts of the secret promoters of the Big Business scam called Crossrail.
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN this week spelling out the details of how Big Business has sabotaged the UK Parliament - as is seen in
This is seen in the behaviour of the bureaucracy that ahs been put in lace to 'treat' , that is to stage the formal 'work' of the 'House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee'.
The Select Committee so far has behaved just as its counterpart in the House of Commons did two years earlier.
Parrot-like, the crucial parts of the staged proceedings mirror the agenda as contained in the scripts of the secret promoters of the Big Business scam called Crossrail.
[To be continued]
The Select Committee so far has behaved just as its counterpart in the House of Commons did two years earlier.
Parrot-like, the crucial parts of the staged proceedings mirror the agenda as contained in the scripts of the secret promoters of the Big Business scam called Crossrail.
[To be continued]
Muhammad Haque daily ethical commentary against the Crossrail hole Bill AGENDA - from T B Macualay to Ken Livingstone...
By©Muhammad Haque
2330 Hr GMT
London Wednesday 26 March 2008
[Editorial and publishing note: Due to the elelectonic communication systems used in the production of these materials being published online e, errors occur in the spelling of words. Some words may sometimes be misplaced in the same process. The publishers are aware of this feature of the process and they attend to the factors as soon as practicable]
In this commentary, which I have written by updating on the key evidence and including the latest dss slurews on Ken Livingstone's role in the planning facilities given to the Guinness fraudster Gerald Ronson- a donor to Ken Livingstone’s careerist trade – the history of the House of Lords is brought into sharp focus and demonstrated as being in line with the real careerist and mala fide purpose of the wrongly promoted Ken Livingstone…
Both Livingstone and the House of Lords are apparently different from the House of Commons. Both are supposed o be almost independent of the House of Lords.
Which they both may be in some respects.
But not when their main agenda is taken into account.
As is becoming very clear by the appearance of a number of key characters in the promotion of the Crossrail hole agenda and scam.
One of the very first diagnoses made in January 2004 by Khoodeelaar! The Campaign against the Crossrail hole plot [=the ‘hybrid’ ‘Crossrail Bill’, now in the UK legislative’ ‘House of Lords’] and against the Crossrail hole agenda against the inner city East End of London, was the following:
That whoever had devised the particular Crossrail hole plot and whoever had advised the controlling planners [to be differentiated from the employed petty bureaucracy of 'town planners'] that this would be a suitable, almost guaranteed safe route to be pushed through, must have done so on the assumption that the affected community was not going to oppose the attack.
As THEY, the Crossrail hole plotters knew, there was all the evidence that their latest City of London plot would be safely passed!
Passed through the Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south and Stepney London E1 area!
After all, they said to one another as they hatched the plot to mount the attack on the community so markedly symbolised by the street called Brick Lane, that the area was in the hands of their own people. ‘Our people practically own the place’, they chortled as they shed cynical tears at the scenario of thousands of [symbolic term deleted] being made to vanish from the area.
Flee the area. Make room for the City of London. Big Business. And for the likes of Gerald Ronson to speculate in and profit from.
Gradually!
We are using the word ‘cynical’ here in its appropriate, accurate sense. As that behaviour which is contemptuous of the rights of the people that are the targets of the behaviour. The behaviour is a combination of reckless disregard for the feelings and for the humanity of the target people.
Cynical is NOT a synonym for sceptical, let alone an alternative to that word.
The NEAREST word in the English language vocabulary to cynical is EVIL.
The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south and Stepney London E1 area is the imm8dsdaite physical area that the Khoodeelaar campaign had already been defending as against the attacks of the CrossRail hole…
That area, for the likes of Matthew Perris, had become home too far too many [symbolic term deleted] for the liking of the ‘world class’ investors that London was interested in attracting…
The property and assorted degenerative prices and marketability of the place needed to be brought to the levels of ‘world class cities’.
World-class cities have been a cliché mouthed by Big Business tout and Crossrail hole plot backer ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone.
Those real leaders of what goes on in the Britain of Tony Bliar, Gordon Brown, knew that ‘their people’ who practically owned the East End of London included the necessary, some might say more than the necessary [symbolic term deleted] to ensure that there would be no hitches at the local council.
‘The council too is owned by our own people!’ they boasted as they sipped drops of celebratory beverage following yet another Crossrail business deal.
Officially, they could not speak a word about it in public.
Not for many years yet.
For that to happen, the ‘Crossrail Bill’ had to get the all clear and become the ‘Crossrail Act’.
It was not so yet.
‘Our people’ are doing the necessary to get it passed by the Houses in Parliament. But the formalities were taking a bit of time.
But that did not stop them from carrying on doing Crossrail business ‘in the target community’.
That they were motivated by a mixture of racist, cultural and political prejudices in coming up with the CRASSrail hole part of the strategy was openly admitted by Matthew Parris, a boastful former ‘script-writer’ to Maggie Thatcher and the London [Rupert Murdoch-owned] Times newspaper-columnist and Neo Conservative media propagandist with firmly rooted pro-apartheid associations and roles.
Parris is a practised liar who has taken on the new tag, describing himself as part of a collective ‘we who opposed the Iraq war’!
He never did. He never could have done. Everything about Parris points to a tendency, a zeal, and a culture that woudl back any excuse to beat up a bunch of [symbolic term deleted]!
This is why Parris could wade into the ‘Brick Lane area’ and declare it a ‘fit’ target to be attacked by the full might of Big Business aided and abetted by the powers available to the British state.
Parris wrote within a short time following the 2005 UK general elections that Tony Blair must
What was the basis of such an assumption?
The answer is: as far as they knew, the mixed population of the area, made up mainly but not necessarily exclusively of European and Asian people, meant that the ‘political’ groupings were pretty much under the control of the backers of the City of London and Big Business.
The significant elements in the ‘political representation’ derived from the ‘locality’ was so perfect for their agenda that even Thomas B Macaulay could not improve on their scheme, were T B Macaulay to be revived!
Rhetorically speaking of course.
It was Macaulay who spake – yes, SPAKE! – In the ‘House of Lords’ of his empire education and administrative philosophy.
Macaulay SPAKE as if he was Enoch Powell addressing one of the hundreds of gatherings that he was allowed to address in the Britain of the 1970s and 1980s.
Grave and prejudiced. And muddled and hateful. And a bully with the utter contempt for ‘other races’. ‘Other races’ were ALWAYS inferior!
He spake as an authentic forerunner and hero of Enoch Powell, although almost 100 years separated them.
BOTH Powell and Macaulay would have approved of what Matthew Parris wrote in 2005.
Referring to the then just recent rejection of Oona King the Blairite backer of the invasion of Iraq by the voters of the ‘local’ constituency of Bethnal Green and Bow, Matthew Parris wrongly blamed the voters for having brought in George Galloway and then opined that that was a crime for which Brick Lane deserved to be punished.
Parris said that he knew of exactly the right punishment. He wrote that the punishment was available in the form of the Crossrail hole plan.
He cheered on the Crossrail hole plotters and said they should rush the CrossRail hole programme through Brick Lane as a lesson for voting in George Galloway!
It is most remarkable that George Galloway has gone on the record, in the past 10 weeks, appearing as a fervent ‘backer of Ken’ Livingstone!
The very man that Matthew Parris raised to a rhetorical status of an idol for the single achievement that Livingstone had shown himself as being the chief tout for the very same CrossRail hole plot.
The very CrossRail, plot which Matthew Parris wanted to be used as punishment against the voters of Brick Lane who, in Parris’ view, had made the crucial difference and had let in George Galloway…
Only because the Tower Hamlets ‘local’ council had filed a formal petition to the ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ in the UK House of Commons [as at 1 March 2006] did not mean that everything was going to be okay for the community.
The Council’s ‘petition’ was NOT anything like an objection to Crossrail.
The ‘petition’ was a form that the controlling claque on the Council was using as a ploy to conceal the Council’s real role under.
That formal petition was a charade staged by the peddlers of the CrossRail hole plot to conceal their real motives and plans. They wanted to deceive the local community.
The deception was in the fact that they wanted to create the impression in the local area in the East End of London that ‘the Tower Hamlets Council was doping something about the CrossRail hole’.
[To be continued]
2330 Hr GMT
London Wednesday 26 March 2008
[Editorial and publishing note: Due to the elelectonic communication systems used in the production of these materials being published online e, errors occur in the spelling of words. Some words may sometimes be misplaced in the same process. The publishers are aware of this feature of the process and they attend to the factors as soon as practicable]
In this commentary, which I have written by updating on the key evidence and including the latest dss slurews on Ken Livingstone's role in the planning facilities given to the Guinness fraudster Gerald Ronson- a donor to Ken Livingstone’s careerist trade – the history of the House of Lords is brought into sharp focus and demonstrated as being in line with the real careerist and mala fide purpose of the wrongly promoted Ken Livingstone…
Both Livingstone and the House of Lords are apparently different from the House of Commons. Both are supposed o be almost independent of the House of Lords.
Which they both may be in some respects.
But not when their main agenda is taken into account.
As is becoming very clear by the appearance of a number of key characters in the promotion of the Crossrail hole agenda and scam.
One of the very first diagnoses made in January 2004 by Khoodeelaar! The Campaign against the Crossrail hole plot [=the ‘hybrid’ ‘Crossrail Bill’, now in the UK legislative’ ‘House of Lords’] and against the Crossrail hole agenda against the inner city East End of London, was the following:
That whoever had devised the particular Crossrail hole plot and whoever had advised the controlling planners [to be differentiated from the employed petty bureaucracy of 'town planners'] that this would be a suitable, almost guaranteed safe route to be pushed through, must have done so on the assumption that the affected community was not going to oppose the attack.
As THEY, the Crossrail hole plotters knew, there was all the evidence that their latest City of London plot would be safely passed!
Passed through the Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south and Stepney London E1 area!
After all, they said to one another as they hatched the plot to mount the attack on the community so markedly symbolised by the street called Brick Lane, that the area was in the hands of their own people. ‘Our people practically own the place’, they chortled as they shed cynical tears at the scenario of thousands of [symbolic term deleted] being made to vanish from the area.
Flee the area. Make room for the City of London. Big Business. And for the likes of Gerald Ronson to speculate in and profit from.
Gradually!
We are using the word ‘cynical’ here in its appropriate, accurate sense. As that behaviour which is contemptuous of the rights of the people that are the targets of the behaviour. The behaviour is a combination of reckless disregard for the feelings and for the humanity of the target people.
Cynical is NOT a synonym for sceptical, let alone an alternative to that word.
The NEAREST word in the English language vocabulary to cynical is EVIL.
The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south and Stepney London E1 area is the imm8dsdaite physical area that the Khoodeelaar campaign had already been defending as against the attacks of the CrossRail hole…
That area, for the likes of Matthew Perris, had become home too far too many [symbolic term deleted] for the liking of the ‘world class’ investors that London was interested in attracting…
The property and assorted degenerative prices and marketability of the place needed to be brought to the levels of ‘world class cities’.
World-class cities have been a cliché mouthed by Big Business tout and Crossrail hole plot backer ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone.
Those real leaders of what goes on in the Britain of Tony Bliar, Gordon Brown, knew that ‘their people’ who practically owned the East End of London included the necessary, some might say more than the necessary [symbolic term deleted] to ensure that there would be no hitches at the local council.
‘The council too is owned by our own people!’ they boasted as they sipped drops of celebratory beverage following yet another Crossrail business deal.
Officially, they could not speak a word about it in public.
Not for many years yet.
For that to happen, the ‘Crossrail Bill’ had to get the all clear and become the ‘Crossrail Act’.
It was not so yet.
‘Our people’ are doing the necessary to get it passed by the Houses in Parliament. But the formalities were taking a bit of time.
But that did not stop them from carrying on doing Crossrail business ‘in the target community’.
That they were motivated by a mixture of racist, cultural and political prejudices in coming up with the CRASSrail hole part of the strategy was openly admitted by Matthew Parris, a boastful former ‘script-writer’ to Maggie Thatcher and the London [Rupert Murdoch-owned] Times newspaper-columnist and Neo Conservative media propagandist with firmly rooted pro-apartheid associations and roles.
Parris is a practised liar who has taken on the new tag, describing himself as part of a collective ‘we who opposed the Iraq war’!
He never did. He never could have done. Everything about Parris points to a tendency, a zeal, and a culture that woudl back any excuse to beat up a bunch of [symbolic term deleted]!
This is why Parris could wade into the ‘Brick Lane area’ and declare it a ‘fit’ target to be attacked by the full might of Big Business aided and abetted by the powers available to the British state.
Parris wrote within a short time following the 2005 UK general elections that Tony Blair must
What was the basis of such an assumption?
The answer is: as far as they knew, the mixed population of the area, made up mainly but not necessarily exclusively of European and Asian people, meant that the ‘political’ groupings were pretty much under the control of the backers of the City of London and Big Business.
The significant elements in the ‘political representation’ derived from the ‘locality’ was so perfect for their agenda that even Thomas B Macaulay could not improve on their scheme, were T B Macaulay to be revived!
Rhetorically speaking of course.
It was Macaulay who spake – yes, SPAKE! – In the ‘House of Lords’ of his empire education and administrative philosophy.
Macaulay SPAKE as if he was Enoch Powell addressing one of the hundreds of gatherings that he was allowed to address in the Britain of the 1970s and 1980s.
Grave and prejudiced. And muddled and hateful. And a bully with the utter contempt for ‘other races’. ‘Other races’ were ALWAYS inferior!
He spake as an authentic forerunner and hero of Enoch Powell, although almost 100 years separated them.
BOTH Powell and Macaulay would have approved of what Matthew Parris wrote in 2005.
Referring to the then just recent rejection of Oona King the Blairite backer of the invasion of Iraq by the voters of the ‘local’ constituency of Bethnal Green and Bow, Matthew Parris wrongly blamed the voters for having brought in George Galloway and then opined that that was a crime for which Brick Lane deserved to be punished.
Parris said that he knew of exactly the right punishment. He wrote that the punishment was available in the form of the Crossrail hole plan.
He cheered on the Crossrail hole plotters and said they should rush the CrossRail hole programme through Brick Lane as a lesson for voting in George Galloway!
It is most remarkable that George Galloway has gone on the record, in the past 10 weeks, appearing as a fervent ‘backer of Ken’ Livingstone!
The very man that Matthew Parris raised to a rhetorical status of an idol for the single achievement that Livingstone had shown himself as being the chief tout for the very same CrossRail hole plot.
The very CrossRail, plot which Matthew Parris wanted to be used as punishment against the voters of Brick Lane who, in Parris’ view, had made the crucial difference and had let in George Galloway…
Only because the Tower Hamlets ‘local’ council had filed a formal petition to the ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ in the UK House of Commons [as at 1 March 2006] did not mean that everything was going to be okay for the community.
The Council’s ‘petition’ was NOT anything like an objection to Crossrail.
The ‘petition’ was a form that the controlling claque on the Council was using as a ploy to conceal the Council’s real role under.
That formal petition was a charade staged by the peddlers of the CrossRail hole plot to conceal their real motives and plans. They wanted to deceive the local community.
The deception was in the fact that they wanted to create the impression in the local area in the East End of London that ‘the Tower Hamlets Council was doping something about the CrossRail hole’.
[To be continued]
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
Khoodeelaar! advice: Brown should drop both ‘Crossrail’ and Ken Livingstone right now!
Internet access notes:
Access to external web pages may not be established from these AADHIKARonline pages. Try to access sites that are listed by description or by URL
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
0010 Hrs GMT London Sunday 23 march 2008: Khoodeelaar! no to ‘‘Crossrail’ hole plotter’ ‘undone mayor’ ken Livingstone, tells the times online that their critical report [by-line Martin Ivens] on Gordon Brown’s Crossrall hole-con-ken burden vindicates the Khoodeelaar! analysis and advice to Gordon Brown:
Brown should drop both ‘Crossrail’ and Ken Livingstone right now!
Mr Ivens has got the predicament and the foolishness of Gordon brown about right.
Mostly so about the over-hyped, over-sold and overdue for the scrapheap ‘‘Crossrail’’ scam.
Khoodeelaar! the campaign in defence of the east end of london and against the ‘‘Crossrail’’ hole bill [now in the uk legislative ‘house of lords’ as the ‘‘‘Crossrail’’ bill’], has been saying since January 2004 that the main criteria on which the validly of any public sector scheme of the cost-intensive nature and size of the plotted ‘‘Crossrail’’ was to be sought in the economic sphere.
Khoodeelaar! has been saying since January 2004 that there is objectively verifiable economic case made for ‘‘Crossrail’’….
Incredibly, even rod Eddington, the ‘expert’ whom chancellor Gordon brown had appointed to do a rep[ort on the future of the railways in the UK advised against ‘‘Crossrail’’ [as reported in October 2007 by channel 4 news].
‘‘Crossrail’’ will waste a lot of money that the badly off public and social sectors in the UK c could put to very good and beneficial use…
Besides, the ‘‘‘Crossrail’ Bill’ is being pushed through parliament in a most unconstitutional way. if our planned constitutional law challenge succeeds then who will account for the hundreds of £millions of public money that has already been given to unaccountable ‘‘Crossrail’’ company [CLRL] already?
A really prudent Gordon brown would drop ‘‘Crossrail’’ and the liability of a Livingstone right now
__________________________________________________
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article3602855.ece
Khoodeelaar! No to Crassrail plugging Lyingstill Ken Livingstone quoting the full texts of the online piece by Martin Ivens as published on the Timesonline at 2310 Hrs GMT on Saturday 22 March 2008.
The piece is consistent with the main comments that Khoodeelaar! Has made from the start of the campaign against the Crossrall hole plotting propaganda of Ken Livingstone.
Khoodeelaar! Said in January 2004 that the main criteria on which the validly of any public sector scheme of the cost-intensive nature and size of the plotted Crossrail was to be sought in the economic sphere.
Khoodeelaar! Has said since January 2004 that there was NO objectively verifiable ECONOMIC case made for Crossrail….
[To be continued]
Gordon Brown’s fate is to find his future tied to Ken Livingstone
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article3602855.ece
“From The Sunday Times
March 23, 2008
Gordon Brown’s fate is to find his future tied to Ken Livingstone
Martin Ivens
Paris was well worth a mass, said a future king of France, the Protestant Henry of Navarre. Gordon Brown is prepared to give up a lot more to hang on to London. Why, he’ll even convert to Ken Livingstone’s cause.
It was a sign of desperate times last week that the prime minister ended one of the most bitter feuds in Labour history by sharing a platform with his old enemy. He is “an inspirational figure in London, a crusading mayor and one who has made a difference”, said Brown. This reconciliation brings to mind the Low cartoon of Hitler’s 1939 pact with Stalin. The Nazi dictator hails his new friend: “The scum of the earth, I believe?” The Soviet tyrant returns the greeting: “The bloody assassin of the workers, I presume?”
Until recently Brown wouldn’t speak Livingstone’s name in the Commons, simply referring to him as “the mayor”. Ten years ago Ken wrote an article accusing Brown of creating a mini-recession in London. The two scrapped like dogs over the-then chancellor’s bungled private-public administration of the Tube. The puritanical Scotsman and the newt-loving friend of Sinn Fein were always polar opposites.
If the Tories take the capital in May then Brown’s bad run will become a rout. London, with all its juicy marginals seats, is a prize indeed. The mayor’s job also provides a platform for an assault on the government’s national policies. A Sunday Times/ YouGov poll last week put the Conservatives 16 points ahead of Labour.
Further midweek polling confirmed an ominous trend that could no longer be dismissed by No 10 spinners as “rogue”. In London, the Tory candidate, Boris Johnson, has also opened up a 12-point lead over Livingstone. The vagaries of second preference votes mean a Conservative victory is by no means assured, but Gordon and Ken know they have to hang together for fear of hanging separately.
South of a line running from the Avon to the Wash, the party controls only two councils outside wobbly London. Labour is back to the bad old days of “southern discomfort”. New Labour was born in 1992 after a fourth successive defeat convinced the young team of Brown/Blair that the party would stay out in the cold forever if it had nothing to say to the aspirant middle classes in the south. Has Gordon lost them once again?
A small swing at the next election against Labour could destroy the southern and metropolitan gains first made in 1997. “We have to win in seats across the southeast . . . as well as Sunderland,” pleaded Hazel Blears, the Blairite communities secretary, at a forum hosted by the pressure groups Progress and Compass last week. Our front-page story reveals that another Blairite, Charles Clarke, the former home secretary, is e-mailing a “doomsday scenario” to southern Labour MPs. The movement of just 7,500 votes in 24 southern marginals, he says, could wipe out a swathe of small Labour majorities that will be cut by boundary changes. As Corporal Jones of Dad’s Army would say: “Don’t panic!”
The polls and a badly received budget have made gloomy reading for the government. Cold winds from America have blown in economic uncertainty. The prime minister has told us that Britain is “better placed to withstand global instability than any other country in Europe”. He may be right. But meanwhile the headlines are awful. Inflationary rises in energy and council taxes, and a sudden rise in remortgaging charges have soured middle England.
Alistair Darling pleaded that the credit crunch is all the fault of foreigners. Perhaps he needs to sound a bit more Franklin Roosevelt – “the only thing we have to fear is fear itself”– and a bit less Herbert Hoover, who ushered in the great depression. The trouble with citing international comparisons is that they are not wholly flattering to Britain. “Compare the do-nothing budget here with what is going on in the US,” charge the Tories. “Look at the speedy rescue of Bear Stearns by JP Morgan. Bear Stearns had far more complicated global transactions than Northern Rock’s.”
In London the financial authorities failed to encourage Lloyds TSB to take over Northern Rock and later, when they actively sought a buyer, found no takers. Billions of dollars in tax breaks are being given to American consumers to lift their spirits while there are talks between Congress and the US president about propping up the housing market. Our efforts here look positively lethargic.
Many Labour MPs look for a silver lining. The polls do not show a stampede from Labour to the Tories but only a falling off in bedrock support. “It’s still ours to lose,” says another backbencher, “and we are proving quite good at losing it.”
When asked by the priest on his deathbed to renounce Satan, Voltaire rejoined: “This is no time to be making enemies.” Brown has picked an odd moment to pick a quarrel with God’s representatives in Britain. Easter will ring to denunciations from pulpits across the country of his “monstrous” plans to whip his MPs behind a bill to allow hybrid human-animal embryos. It is a row that could lose him three Roman Catholic members of his cabinet. His response to these problems is a corporate makeover and a change of personnel, though the critics demand something more radical.
Chancellor Brown’s operation at No 11 was famously tight and clannish. Now there is unease at No 10 as the new company systems man, chief of staff Stephen Carter, flexes his muscles. Out go old retainers such as Gordon’s pollster, Spencer Livermore. In come new suits like David Muir, the advertising guru.
Most Labour figures I speak to discount No 10 reshuffles as so much froth, but the Conservatives are jubilant. “You get great headlines when you bring in new people to the heart of a political operation, but it can be very destabilising,” says one. A top Tory gloats: “For 14 to 15 years I have been on the receiving end of advice telling us we need an Alastair Campbell figure. Now I read that Gordon Brown needs a Steve Hilton [Cameron’s strategy boss] or an Andy Coulson [his press chief].”
Brown is in a hole. A deluge of activity between Christmas and Easter has petered out with the polls back to nowhere. Dependability during times of trouble was his trump card. Now Cameron and George Osborne, the shadow chancellor, have overtaken Brown and Darling on stewardship of the economy. One of Brown’s Labour critics argues that the economy itself is not the problem: “He’s broadly in the right place. The message: ‘I’ve been chancellor for 10 years, I’m the guy with the experience and we’ve been through these things before, I can get you through them again,’ is fine.” Nor are the process and organisation of No 10 the problem. “It’s the mission.”
Brown thinks he’s got a long time. but although the election is likely to be in 2010 an economic downturn means political recovery lags a long way behind. “Say what you like about Tony but even his enemies knew what he stood for. What do we stand for now?” One Cabinet minister apparently worried about it to Brown’s face.
And what if Labour’s southern discomfort turns into northern exposure? There is still little enthusiasm for the Tories above the Avon-Wash line. The Conservative spring conference in Gateshead a week ago was a muted affair without wider resonance in the region. But nowadays there is little of the rancid hostility to the party that attached to it in the days of Margaret Thatcher and John Major. My friends in the north tell me fears of a recession have brought gloom, restaurants half empty at weekends and worries of worse to come.
In this climate Labour’s loyal core support won’t defect to the other side. It might not turn out at all. No wonder last week the Tories were crowing that Brown has reached a turning point.
London’s election day, May 1, is his opportunity to stop the rot. But the prime minister can help his new friend Livingstone only so much. Ken is Ken, a maverick whose fortunes go up or down according to his erratic behaviour and the antics of his wild friends. He is only semidetached Labour at best. It’s an odd twist of fate that puts Gordon’s future in his hands.”
___________________________________________________
AADHIKARonline
Editor©Muhammad Haque
The 8th edition of the day of the AADHIKAROnline london uk was updated at 2220 Hrs GMT on Friday 21 March 2008
Even Gordon Brown must know that he cannot go on uttering Blairing lies now that he, Gordon Brown, is in actual occupation of the office that the Bliar did occupy for a good 10 years!!! So why did Gordon Brown make the desperate packaged performances to Ken Livingstone’s career-prompted tunes?
[To be continued]
Click here for the latest contents of the Khoodeelaar! manifesto 2008 against ken Livingstone and against Livingstone’s egotistic wasteful adventure and CRoSSRAIL hole plot - continuing the Khoodeelaar! response to Gordon Brown who was again touted into the Crassrail hole plot propaganda manipulation by the crafty, confidence-trickster ken Lyingstill Livingstone..._the embarrassing display of Gordon Brown almost looking like Mr bean as he held his left arm aloft to give support to the over-zealous right arm of the insecure and the conniving ken Livingstone…. _the moment of Gordon Brown looking Mr bean as he played the part o Mr bean was witnessed ‘on location’ in ‘canary wharf’ where a few more such ‘moments’ of crassness were on view. witnesses have confirmed that Gordon Brown did not succeed in selling the career plan and agenda of ken Livingstone even to those ‘invited’ collection of time-serving career minded ‘faithfuls’ along side the choice selection of simplified sleepwalkers programmed to serve the zombie-master who promised to bribe them to their greed contents_one allegedly ‘proper’ university-awarded ‘graduate’ moaned that she could not get a job. due to the discrimination that was enveloping the corrupted canary wharf and its socially and otherwise ‘gated’ island sited on the image of the former isle of dogs _before the dirty dancing promotion of ken Livingstone’s ego and career day ended, the ‘complaining’ female ‘graduate’ was approached with suitable preferment and opportunity!!!!! _AADHIKAROnline will complete this weekend the report on Gordon Brown’s embarrassing day at canary wharf __returning to Brown’s endorsement of the ego of the very insecure ken Livingstone as confessed to the london evening standard [as published on Thursday 20 March 2008], we shall take that recorded item of immorality and irresponsibility apart, seam by every lying seam. We started our response to Gordon Brown at 1700 hrs GMT yesterday Thursday 20 march 2008. _On this link will also appear, later on this weekend the next sets of the Khoodeelaar! No to 'Crossrail hole Bill’ CAMPAIGN breaking news, this weekend continuing with the key reports on the conduct of the ‘legislative’ ‘ upper chamber’ [query this!!!!!!!!] [‘House of Lords’ at ‘Westminster’, London SW1] ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’, Khoodeelaar! Campaign news updates against the Crassrail hole Bill draft legislation, Khoodeelaar! Campaign against ‘Crossrail hole Bill agenda’ statements and Khoodeelaar! No to ‘Crossrail hole Bill Big Business agenda’ CAMPAIGN action announcements…..
_And a new AADHIKARonline feature examining the festering lobby-touts for Big Business that are finishing off all remaining pretences of a ‘democratic’ ‘parliament’ ‘of’ the UK as is ‘housed’ in the ‘Palace of Westminster’!!!!!!
AADHIKARonline in association with Khoodeelaar! CAMPAIGN against the Crossrail hole plot, is today [Thursday 20 march 2008] introducing another phrase we have devised in context to accurately describe the crass role being played for Big Business by the Uk ‘Houses of parliament’. It was described until the AADHIKARonline editions as published on 19 March 2008 as a ‘draft’ piece of legislation. From this morning [Thursday 20 March 2008] onwards, the ‘draft’ piece of [Crassrail hole Bill] legislation shall be also described as a ‘daft’ piece of legislation. And appropriate elaborative words, phrases and citations will be included as we continue to dissect the daft piece of legislation. The opposition to that crass, the daft piece of legislation is being organised by Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area CAMPAIGN against the CROSSRAIL HOLE plot [‘formally’ known as] the ‘Crossrail Bill’ the ‘hybrid’ piece of draft [‘daft’!] legislation contrived and peddled at the prompting of Big Business/capitalist City of London Interests and now in the UK legislative ‘HOUSE OF LORDS’ where 113 objections to it put from across London including from the East End of London are being ‘considered’ …And AADHIKAROnline along with the associated web sites, logs and other campaigning media, have been publishing the key evidence of the institutionalised misconduct to which the ‘Houses of Parliament’ have been lobby-ed into… by the elements of institutionalised and institutionalising corruption, sleaze, greed, profit , callousness, opportunism, careerism, deception and racism… We shall be focussing on the central flaws that make a mockery of the boast ‘Mother of Parliaments’. It is an offence against common sense to call that building ‘the mother’ of anything, if the word ‘mother’ means what it universally is associated with and is perceived to mean…._[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! This week in the UK “Houses of Parliament’ Saying No to Big Business Crossrail hole plot –___full reports and Khoodeelaar! Constitutional law commentaries due here and on the associated Khoodeelaar web sites throughout today Thursday 20 March 2008
Muhammad Haque ethical and economic commentary
1025 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 19 March 2008_
On the lies that are retailed via the BBC. Those lies are given the gloss of state-sponsored legitimacy for Big Business agenda as they are mouthed by John Humphrys on the BBC Radio 4 ‘Today’ programme – the man that has been installed as the BBC's marketing gimmick along side Jeremy Paxman. Between the two of them, it is said, there is no area of ethics, morality and integrity left unvoiced and unrepresented!……_That is the BBC’s marketing line for Paxman and Humphrys. _And that is a pack of lies. Lies that are linked directly with the peddling of ‘Canary Wharf’ for Crassrail. And all that that peddling entails at the expense of the ordinary people in the East End of London.
Just under two years ago, Canary Wharf Crossrail hole plotters lies were presented as ‘respectable fact’ on the BBC TV. _In the edition of ‘the Politics Show’ as broadcast on Sunday 26 March 2006, Bernard Gambrill was allowed to utter unchallenged and unexamined another grotesque lie. About thousands of jobs being created by Crassrail... But he neither showed the correlation nor could he show the correlation between job creation mouthing and the people in and of the East end of `London .…. That detached utterance and assertion was allowed to go unchallenged. _In the context of the events and the reality in March 2008, I shall be updating the Khoodeelaar! dissection of Bernard Gambrill's Crassrail lies. That examination will appear here later this week.
The BBC Radio 4 Today programme ‘stalwart’ John Humphrys lied for Crassrail hole plotting agenda couriers and peddlers. _So detached from reality was John Humphrys as he giggled like a hero-worshipper zombie uttering his servile ‘many thanks’ to his ‘American guest’, he left the clear impression that he, Humphrys is, must have been and was part of the Big Business lying Brigade pushing for the Crassrail hole scam. _Crassrail has been peddled as ‘crucial’ for the linking of ‘Canary Wharf’ with Heathrow [via the capitalist enclave called the City of London] . The Brigade that was actively engaged in the takeover of the land across what used to be the Isle of Dogs in the inner city London borough of Tower Hamlets…. _It is now subliminally packaged as ‘Canary Wharf’, to make the opportunity available for looters that instantly recognise ‘Canary Wharf’ as one of their very own class and capitalist signals….`_From Michael Heseltine [who was a faker as an alleged ‘nearly-liberal’ Conservative alternative to the vile Conservative ideology of Margaret Thatcher] who took the decisive steps and fronted the symbolic and structural assaults against the economic, social and environmental rights of the people [of ordinary East London neighbourhoods] for Big business when he was in the Thatchered UK administration and he [Hezza] degenerated the former Isle of Dogs and took the 'zone' out of the reach of the local people in the ordinary neighbourhoods of the East End of London. _Local, East End people were unable to afford the land around what is now 'Canary Wharf' [as a generic concept and a euphemism to denote the wider land on the Isle of Dogs] so it would be grabbed by the likes of the Reich Man ! What a name! _All the way from Canada ?! Reich Man !! Reich!!! Of course the Reichmann that fronted the takeover of the area would furiously deny any link with the notorious Third Reichers in the Germany of the past European century. He would join the opponents and critics of the Third Reich. _But he still would side with and be identified with the capitalist and takeover forces that are and will be as hostile to the needs of the people of the East End as many of the adherents of the Third Reich would have been. If the electoral programmes seen o the Isle of Dogs during the first half of the 1990s was anything to go by. _When the Third Reichists deployed on the 'Isle of Dogs' [1990-1994] were unable to make any sustained attack on the ‘democratic’ front, their real managers, the ‘capitalists’ Reich man, Reich MEN and Reich WOMEN moved in. and what has taken place on the `Isle of Dogs since the 1994 ‘local Tower Hamlets council election’ has been very much along the lines of social and economic apartheid in the East End of London___[To be continued]_Back to the BBC Radio 4 Today programme Wednesday 19 March 2008___Was that voice on the Radio 4 ‘Today’ programme that of Bechtel Cliff Mumm we suffered just a while ago this morning in the packaged propaganda piece for Big Business creepy confidence trick plugger with an almost Texan voice and accent ? __It was played at the expense of the truth [and by concealing the truth from the licence-paying members of the public in Britain] during the last few minutes of the BBC Radio 4 ‘Today’ programme this morning Wednesday 19 March 2008? _The vile, untruthful voice of lies uttered that he could not make a booking for lunch at Canary Wharf yesterday. Yesterday, Tuesday 18 March 2008. Whatever could he have wanted to refer to Canary Wharf for? The short answer is that he was comparing canary Wharf with a list of locations in the USA - where too he said there had been no sign of economic crisis, where people were spending their dosh as per usual, where the pace and the texture of consumption and indulgence was just as visible and discernible yesterday [Tuesday 18 March 2008] as it had been for the years that had gone by. _Humphrys had earlier ‘tackled’ a minor diplomat from the Chinese embassy in London over Tibet.__[To be continued]
. Khoodeelaar! No to the Crossrail hole plot campaign ‘in the legislative UK House of Lords’ [where the ‘hybrid’ ‘Crossrail Bill’ is being given the formal, bureaucratic effect of approval under the influence of Big Business which has taken over the ‘parliamentary bureaucracy’. AADHIKARonline is. Reporting on ‘the week of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against unconstitutionality in parliament – how the Bechtel-influenced UK department for transport [DfT] has sabotaged whatever there might have been of ‘independence’ in the ‘legislative’ ‘house of lords’’
. how there is the eerie similarity between the lies as recorded in the proceedings, starting at paragraph 3382 of the ‘house of lords Crossrail bill’ ‘select committee’ and the lies in the crass corridors of Crossrail hole plotter Ken Livingstone’s ‘ Xxxxxy Hall’
. we publish the key Khoodeelaar! Constitutional, legal and evidential communications as sent to the ‘house of lords’
. we publish the key e-mails sent to the ‘committee clerk’
. we publish the key e-mails sent by Khoodeelaar! To the pre-formal stage of the ‘Crossrail bill select committee’
. we publish the key e-mails sent to Ruth Kelly
. and the Khoodeelaar! Complaint to the ‘house of lords’ ‘management’
. and the Khoodeelaar! Grounds in constitutional law for the challenge in the European Human rights forum against the very thing, the entirety of the uk parliament which has been on the facts so far, in the grip of big business and not functioning at all as a sovereign parliament,- more like the parasitic banana republican stooge place…
.
‘Crassrail hole plotter Ken Con Lyingstill contaminates the process of democracy
_
’House of Lords’ is being treated as the ‘House of Lureds’!
More, here shortly
__View the latest Khoodeelaar! Report on ‘Today in Parliament’ focusing on the behaviour of the ‘House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee’, which is in formal session this month. These reports are being published by AADHIKAR Media Foundation and Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN, to show how the UK Parliament has been in paralysis under pressure from parasites purchased by Big Business and placed in the parliamentary bureaucracy to get the unconstitutional Crossrail hole Bill through_[To be continued]
BBC ‘flagship’ ‘news and current affairs’ programme ‘Today’ exceeds the limits of indecency and over hypes bonking instead of explaining the deep crisis in western capitalist banking
The Muhammad Haque ethical commentary
1105 Hrs GMT London Monday 17 March 2008
Shocking News! The BBC actually lets listeners to the ‘Today’ programme hear a bit of the truth about the capitalist banking system being in quite a serious crisis! _Being party to the imperialist occupation policies of the G W Bush and the Neo-Cons' enterprise, the BBC of course, failed to mention the full facts. And they most certainly did not refer to the ‘Texan Mumm!’ _. Of Bechtel! The same edition of the BBC Radio 4 ‘Today’ programme [Monday 17 March 2008] did make sub-pornographic references and even staged pornographic ‘discussion’ flaunted by a giggling John Humphrys who was sounding as if he was enjoying the excuse to aim his ‘sexual’ ‘arousal’ references at co-presenter Sara[h] Montague under the guises of ‘information’ pieces. But they did not want the ‘middle English’ listeners to be ‘frightened’ by being told the truth about the costs of collusion with criminal excesses of latent capitalist imperialism..._How many letters are there in the ‘English’ language word ‘crisis’? Let’s count them: six letters. There is only one letter that makes ‘crisis’ ‘different’ from ‘crass’. In all other relevant details, both words, ‘crisis’ and ‘crass’ signify the same thing in effect. And they do the SAME thing in this context. Crisis and crass are the same! Crass. rail. Crass. role. The BBC has been playing a crass role in peddling the crassly conceived ‘Crossrail’ scam for years. And the ‘Today’ programme, which this morning [Monday 17 March 2008] contained another pro-racist, parasitic and corrupting lie-piece in support of the ideology and the spin and propaganda for the occupation of Iraq by G W Bush, his Neo-Cons and assortments of parasites from all over the ‘developed’ regions of the world, failed to include any statement that would remotely suggest that in Iraq there are human beings who have been under a terrifying occupation for as long as they have been. The gloss put over the racist occupation of Iraq by the BBC was too much. There was no reference on the Radio 4 Today programme this morning to the correlation between capitalism, profit, greed, 'development' occupation and the banking crisis that has now begun to hit so many of the apparently unassailable ones in the USA. _May be the discussion would not be arousing enough for John Humphrys and Sarah Montague! So they minimised the truth on the banking crisis and were gagging to do an extended one on aspects of bonking, in the morning, on ‘radio four’ !_With such rampant propensity being exhibited by none other than John Humphrys – who has been elevated by the 'Daily Mail' Group at least, to a status of being the morality champion of ‘middle England’ – what chance is there of middle England being told the truth by any outlet on domestic BBC?_[To be continued]
?
[?
[?
[
Crossrail hole in Whitechapel - how Ken Livingstone is linked by donation with Gerald Ronson, one of the ‘Guinness Four’, a fraudster who served jail for six months, gave Ken Livingstone cash donation in 2004 and a theatre ticket worth more than £150.00 in 2006
the full story - on this site later today. The story has been published by Rupert Murdoch's London Sunday Times today Sunday 16 March 2008
_AADHIKARonline quoting the London Independent on Sunday [16 March 2008] web site describing the role of the TEXAS, USA, man Cliff Mumm in the multi-Billion £ Iraq, UK contracts, including Sellafield and Crossrail. And also stating, as if there is no ‘House of Lords Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill’ being involved far less the ‘House of Lords as a hole being entitled to any say or relevant to having any say on the contents, the purpose and the implications of the ‘Crossrail Bill’!
_AADHIKARonline quoting the London Independent on Sunday [16 March 2008] web site describing the role of the TEXAS, USA, man Cliff Mumm in the multi-Billion £ Iraq, UK contracts, including Sellafield and Crossrail. And also stating, as if there is no ‘House of Lords Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill’ being involved far less the ‘House of Lords as a hole being entitled to any say or relevant to having any say on the contents, the purpose and the implications of the ‘CrossRail Bill’!
_Iraq to UK: a Texan tale
Having rebuilt Iraq, it seems Cliff Mumm (right), a senior vice-president at US giant Bechtel, is set on doing the same for the UK. _The Texan, who led Bechtel's $2.3bn (£1.1bn) contract to repair Iraq's infrastructure, is back in the UK having received a CBE for rescuing the £4.5bn Jubilee Line extension on London's Underground. Mumm is leading Bechtel's bid, due next month, for the £20bn contract to decommission Sellafield and he is advising on the construction of the £16bn Crossrail scheme, which is expected to get Royal Assent in the summer. _
By©Muhammad Haque
1044 Hrs GMT London Saturday 15 March 2008
The Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the ‘Crossrail hole Bill’ has been ‘in contact’ with the bureaucracy in the UK ‘legislative’ ‘House of Lords’ in Westminster since the first half of November 2007.
The contacts have been solely to do with the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the ‘hybrid’ piece of ‘draft’ legislation, called the ‘Crossrail Bill’ that is now [15 March 2008] in that ‘House’. The facts and the evidence of the attitude of the < bureaucracy, the agenda of the bureaucracy and the antics of the bureaucracy [to date] have been so telling about just how total has been – is- the morass in the ‘Mother of Parliaments’ that it is absolutely important and necessary to examine the condition in some detail. Before starting the ‘reporting' of the ‘proceedings’ so far of the 'House of Lords Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill’ in the NECESSARY detail. Before anything can be said about the formal ‘proceedings’ that will make sense In context I therefore begin with a brief look at the conduct of Oliver Cromwell___’Good old Oliver’!_Why had Oliver Cromwell scrapped the ‘House of Lords’? __Was THAT an act of irrationality and insanity for which Cromwell could be denounced? Or did he do it because the ‘House of Lords’ was indeed a ‘House’ that was in the grip of parasites? __Parliamentary parasites! _Parasites holding 'parliament to ransom'?_Parasites impersonating the personnel in place allegedly to make parliament the peoples' platform?????? _
[To be continued]
_Khoodeelaar! set to challenge the unconstitutional conduct in the UK ‘House of lords’ ‘CROSSRAIL Hole Bill ‘Select Committee’ – more here starting 1100 Hrs GMT Saturday 15 MARCH 2008
The following report will now be published at the weekend.
Today [13 March 2008] in the UK Parliament: Khoodeelaar campaigners Say NO to Crossrail hole Bill. Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area CAMPAIGN against the CROSSRAIL HOLE plot [‘formally’ known as] the ‘Crossrail Bill’ the ‘hybrid’ piece of draft [‘daft’!] legislation contrived and peddled at the prompting of Big Business/capitalist City of London Interests and now in the UK legislative ‘HOUSE OF LORDS’ where 113 objections to it put from across London including from the East End of London are being ‘considered’ …
__________________________________________________
By©Muhammad Haque
Muhammad Haque daily ethical commentary on the state and society in Blaired Britain fronted by Gordon Brown: London [‘Good Friday’ of the Christian Easter religious week] 1545 Hrs GMT Friday 21 March 2008:
The daily express and the daily star owned by Richard Desmond [whom the Richard Ingrams-Paul Foot-founded ‘private eye’ calls ‘dirty desmond’], have carried two prominent items on their front pages this week. Their abject grovelling apology to the ‘Mccans’ and their really dirty attacks on Heather McCartney….
This conduct raises many questions….
Contrast the Dirty One’s confessions over the mccans with his continuing attacks on Heather McCartney. Notice how Desmond’s two tabloid titles have mounted a reinforced attack of violent denunciation of the woman even as they were pretending to be reporting the final stage of Heather’s divorce action with Paul McCartney.
Their willingness to unite against Heather in that same way and with such unconcealed words and display of hatred cannot, surely, be in keeping with the words of apology they record towards the legal team of the McCans…..
The ‘unprecedented publication of apology on their front pages to the mccans’ by the two titles, the Daily Express and the Daily Star, have been much discussed by the moronic ‘media experts’ typified by the slumberous Roy Greenslow. But most of those ‘analyses’ left out the subject titles’ venomous attacks on Heather McCartney on the same front pages on the same date in the same editions!
Whatever must have given them the gall to run those headlines and those poisonous personal attacks on Heather McCartney, the message they are giving in those attacks is this: that the tabloid press RESERVE and ASSERT the right [!!!!] to “the freedom of the tabloid press which is the freedom from morality, ethics and accuracy... “.
Where is the ‘National Union of Journalists’ at a time such as this?
May be the NUJ doesn’t exist.
Com to think of it, the NUJ never does exist when groups of its alleged members behave like hordes of criminals let loose on people they perceive to be unable to defend themselves.
The NUJ is just as much to blame as the tabloid titles, which are written, edited and promoted by NUJ members – and by members of their sister trade unions.
Most of the time. On most occasions.
So what is it that causes the morass in the NUJ at tough and critical times?
[To be continued]
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Muhammad Haque asks at 1918 Hrs GMT Thursday 20 March 2008:
Is Gordon Brown putting on the fake smile because his aides are confirming in his earphone that Livingstone is looking decidedly glum and is wearing a more fake smile than Brown himself - thus signalling to Brown's 'well-wishers' [the shrinking group that is getting smaller by the second] that Brown has punctured Livingstone's careerist arrogance and vanity... What paragraph of Livingstone's condemnation of Brown in the London Independent [the London print newspaper] in the 1990s is Brown remembering as he is standing there as the 'big savior' of Livingstone's sinking electoral ship...?????.!!!!
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! No to Gordon Brown repeating discredited Ken Livingstone’s Crassrail hole plot lies - More, here, next
Coming here later today, Thursday 20 March 2008
Khoodeelaar! Item-by-item response to Gordon Brown's ill-advised and misleading promotion of Crassrail Ken Livingstone in the London 'EVERNING STANDARD'
_____________________________________________________
Muhammad Haque at 1400 hrs 20 March 2008 asks: Is Ken Livingstone rushing to re-hire Bob Kiley, with the 'USA perspective' on things, so Kiley can re-invigorate the housing 'boom' which will take place following the predicted crash and be promoted by Livingstone as yet another World CLASS CRASH that he will link to the wonders of Crossrail...?
COMING here during Thursday 20 March 2008 are the following:-
Coming here on AADHIKARonline: Latest Khoodeelaar! Report on the misconduct and the lies being told in the ‘House of Lords’ by Big Business stooges...
Latest Khoodeelaar! Report on the misconduct and the lies being told in the ‘House of Lords’ by the stooges of Big Business CRoSSRAIL hole Bill plot and agendas
Khoodeelaar! Exposing the latest pack of Ken Lyingstill Livingstone's crass lies on Transport at the expense of the people of London
And another AADHIKARonline insight into the lying unit at the Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole-inviting Council’s ‘major projects’ fabrication - we ask, what on earth was `Owen Whalley', the main man fronting the Tower Hamlets Council’s major disasters plots, dong in that little room in the ‘House of Lords’? Was he there to hear the list of allegations against him being read out or presented to the ‘House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee’? And who was going to read out the allegations against Owen Whalley ? And what, exactly, had he prepared for the ‘Lords’ to ‘read’ in that note that he shiftily passed to one of the bureaucrats?
[To be continued]
__________________________________________________
The 4th Edition of the day of the AADHIKAROnline London UK was updated at 0915 Hrs GMT on Thursday 20 March 2008
CLICK HERE for the latest Khoodeelaar! No to 'Crossrail hole Bill’ breaking campaign news, this week continuing with the key reports on the conduct of the ‘legislative’ ‘ upper chamber’ [query this!!!!!!!!] [‘House of Lords’ at ‘Westminster’, London SW1] ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’, Khoodeelaar! campaign news updates against the Crassrail hole Bill draft legislation, Khoodeelaar! campaign against ‘Crossrail hole Bill agenda’ statements and Khoodeelaar! No to ‘Crossrail hole Bill agenda’ action announcements….. And a new AADHIKARonline feature examining the festering lobby-touts for Big Business that are finishing off all remaining pretences of a ‘democratic’ ‘parliament’ ‘of’ the UK as is ‘housed’ in the ‘Palace of Westminster’!!!!!!
AADHIKARonline is today introducing in association with Khoodeelaar! another phrase to accurately describe the crass role being played fro Big Business by the Uk ‘Houses of parliament’. It was described until the AADHIKARonline editions as published on 19 March 2008 as a ‘draft’ piece of legislation. From this morning [Thursday 20 March 2008] onwards, the ‘draft’ piece of [Crassrail hole Bill] legislation shall be also described as a ‘daft’ piece of legislation. And appropriate elaborative words, phrases and citations will be included as we continue to dissect the daft piece of legislation. The opposition to that crass, the daft piece of legislation is being organised by Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area CAMPAIGN against the CROSSRAIL HOLE plot [‘formally’ known as] the ‘Crossrail Bill’ the ‘hybrid’ piece of draft [‘daft’!] legislation contrived and peddled at the prompting of Big Business/capitalist City of London Interests and now in the UK legislative ‘HOUSE OF LORDS’ where 113 objections to it put from across London including from the East End of London are being ‘considered’ …And AADHIKAROnline along with the associated web sites, logs and other campaigning media, have been publishing the key evidence of the institutionalized misconduct to which the ‘Houses of Parliament’ have been lobby-ed into… by the elements of institutionalised and institutionalising corruption, sleaze, greed, profit , callousness, opportunism, careerism, deception and racism… We shall be focussing on the central flaws that make a mockery of the boast ‘Mother of Parliaments’. It is an offence against common sense to call that building ‘the mother’ of anything, if the word ‘mother’ means what it universally is associated with and is perceived to mean….
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! This week in the UK “Houses of Parliament’ Saying No to Big Business Crossrail hole plot –___full reports and Khoodeelaar! constitutional law commentaries due here and on the associated Khoodeelaar web sites throughout today Thursday 20 March 2008
Muhammad Haque ethical and economic commentary
1025 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 19 March 2008_
on the lies that are retailed via the BBC. Those lies are given the gloss of state-sponsored legitimacy for Big Business agenda as they are mouthed by John Humphrys on the BBC Radio 4 ‘Today’ programme – the man that has been installed as the BBC's marketing gimmick along side Jeremy Paxman. Between the two of them, it is said, there is no area of ethics, morality and integrity left unvoiced and unrepresented!……_That is the BBC’s marketing line for Paxman and Humphrys. _And that is a pack of lies. Lies that are linked directly with the peddling of ‘Canary Wharf’ for Crassrail. And all that that peddling entails at the expense of the ordinary people in the East End of London.
Just under two years ago, Canary Wharf Crossrail hole plotters lies were presented as ‘respectable fact’ on the BBC TV. _In the edition of ‘the Politics Show’ as broadcast on Sunday 26 March 2006, Bernard Gambrill was allowed to utter unchallenged and unexamined another grotesque lie. About thousands of jobs being created by Crassrail... But he neither showed the correlation nor could he show the correlation between job creation mouthing and the people in and of the East end of `London .…. That detached utterance and assertion was allowed to go unchallenged. _In the context of the events and the reality in March 2008, I shall be updating the Khoodeelaar! dissection of Bernard Gambrill's Crassrail lies. That examination will appear here later this week.
The BBC Radio 4 Today programme ‘stalwart’ John Humphrys lied for Crassrail hole plotting agenda couriers and peddlers. _So detached from reality was John Humphrys as he giggled like a hero-worshipper zombie uttering his servile ‘many thanks’ to his ‘American guest’, he left the clear impression that he, Humphrys is, must have been and was part of the Big Business lying Brigade pushing for the Crassrail hole scam. _Crassrail has been peddled as ‘crucial’ for the linking of ‘Canary Wharf’ with Heathrow [via the capitalist enclave called the City of London] . The Brigade that was actively engaged in the takeover of the land across what used to be the Isle of Dogs in the inner city London borough of Tower Hamlets…. _It is now subliminally packaged as ‘Canary Wharf’, to make the opportunity available for looters that instantly recognise ‘Canary Wharf’ as one of their very own class and capitalist signals….`_From Michael Heseltine [who was a faker as an alleged ‘nearly-liberal’ Conservative alternative to the vile Conservative ideology of Margaret Thatcher] who took the decisive steps and fronted the symbolic and structural assaults against the economic, social and environmental rights of the people [of ordinary East London neighbourhoods] for Big business when he was in the Thatchered UK administration and he [Hezza] degenerated the former Isle of Dogs and took the 'zone' out of the reach of the local people in the ordinary neighbourhoods of the East End of London. _Local, East End people were unable to afford the land around what is now 'Canary Wharf' [as a generic concept and a euphemism to denote the wider land on the Isle of Dogs] so it would be grabbed by the likes of the Reich Man ! What a name! _All the way from Canada ?! Reich Man !! Reich!!! Of course the Reichmann that fronted the takeover of the area would furiously deny any link with the notorious Third Reichers in the Germany of the past European century. He would join the opponents and critics of the Third Reich. _But he still would side with and be identified with the capitalist and takeover forces that are and will be as hostile to the needs of the people of the East End as many of the adherents of the Third Reich would have been. If the electoral programmes seen o the Isle of Dogs during the first half of the 1990s was anything to go by. _When the Third Reichists deployed on the 'Isle of Dogs' [1990-1994] were unable to make any sustained attack on the ‘democratic’ front, their real managers, the ‘capitalists’ Reich man, Reich MEN and Reich WOMEN moved in.__And what has taken place on the `Isle of Dogs since the 1994 ‘local Tower Hamlets council election’ has been very much along the lines of social and economic apartheid in the East End of London___[To be continued]_Back to the BBC Radio 4 Today programme Wednesday 19 March 2008___Was that voice on the Radio 4 ‘Today’ programme that of Bechtel Cliff Mumm we suffered just a while ago this morning in the packaged propaganda piece for Big Business creepy confidence trick plugger with an almost Texan voice and accent ? __It was played at the expense of the truth [and by concealing the truth from the licence-paying members of the public in Britain] during the last few minutes of the BBC Radio 4 ‘Today’ programme this morning Wednesday 19 March 2008? _The vile, untruthful voice of lies uttered that he could not make a booking for lunch at Canary Wharf yesterday. Yesterday being Tuesday 18 March 2008. Whatever could he have wanted to refer to Canary Wharf for? The short answer is that he was comparing canary Wharf with a list of locations in the USA - where too he said there had been no sign of economic crisis, where people were spending their dosh as per usual, where the pace and the texture of consumption and indulgence was just as visible and discernible yesterday [Tuesday 18 March 2008] as it had been for the years that had gone by. _Humphrys had earlier ‘tackled’ a minor diplomat from the Chinese embassy in London over Tibet.__[To be continued]
. Khoodeelaar! No to the Crossrail hole plot campaign ‘in the legislative UK House of Lords’ [where the ‘hybrid’ ‘Crossrail Bill’ is being given the formal, bureaucratic effect of approval under the influence of Big Business which has taken over the ‘parliamentary bureaucracy’. AADHIKARonline is. Reporting on ‘the week of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against unconstitutionality in parliament – how the Bechtel-influenced UK department for transport [DfT] has sabotaged whatever there might have been of ‘independence’ in the ‘legislative’ ‘house of lords’’
. how there is the eerie similarity between the lies as recorded in the proceedings, starting at paragraph 3382 of the ‘house of lords Crossrail bill’ ‘select committee’ and the lies in the crass corridors of Crossrail hole plotter Ken Livingstone’s ‘ Xxxxxy Hall’
. we publish the key Khoodeelaar! Constitutional, legal and evidential communications as sent to the ‘house of lords’
. we publish the key e-mails sent to the ‘committee clerk’
. we publish the key e-mails sent by Khoodeelaar! To the pre-formal stage of the ‘Crossrail bill select committee’
. we publish the key e-mails sent to Ruth Kelly
. and the Khoodeelaar! Complaint to the ‘house of lords’ ‘management’
. and the Khoodeelaar! Grounds in constitutional law for the challenge in the European Human rights forum against the very thing, the entirety of the uk parliament which has been on the facts so far, in the grip of big business and not functioning at all as a sovereign parliament,- more like the parasitic banana republican stooge place…
.
‘Crassrail hole plotter Ken Con Lyingstill contaminates the process of democracy
_
’House of Lords’ is being treated as the ‘House of Lureds’!
More, here shortly
__View the latest Khoodeelaar! Report on ‘Today in Parliament’ focusing on the behaviour of the ‘House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee’, which is in formal session this month. These reports are being published by AADHIKAR Media Foundation and Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN, to show how the UK Parliament has been in paralysis under pressure from parasites purchased by Big Business and placed in the parliamentary bureaucracy to get the unconstitutional Crossrail hole Bill through_[
To be continued]
BBC ‘flagship’ ‘news and current affairs’ programme ‘Today’ exceeds the limits of indecency and over hypes bonking instead of explaining the deep crisis in western capitalist banking
The Muhammad Haque ethical commentary
1105 Hrs GMT London Monday 17 March 2008
Shocking News! The BBC actually lets listeners to the ‘Today’ programme hear a bit of the truth about the capitalist banking system being in quite a serious crisis! _Being party to the imperialist occupation policies of the G W Bush and the Neo-Cons' enterprise, the BBC of course, failed to mention the full facts. And they most certainly did not refer to the ‘Texan Mumm!’ _. Of Bechtel! The same edition of the BBC Radio 4 ‘Today’ programme [Monday 17 March 2008] did make sub-pornographic references and even staged pornographic ‘discussion’ flaunted by a giggling John Humphrys who was sounding as if he was enjoying the excuse to aim his ‘sexual’ ‘arousal’ references at co-presenter Sara[h] Montague under the guises of ‘information’ pieces. But they did not want the ‘middle English’ listeners to be ‘frightened’ by being told the truth about the costs of collusion with criminal excesses of latent capitalist imperialism..._How many letters are there in the ‘English’ language word ‘crisis’? Let’s count them: six letters. There is only one letter that makes ‘crisis’ ‘different’ from ‘crass’. In all other relevant details, both words, ‘crisis’ and ‘crass’ signify the same thing in effect. And they do the SAME thing in this context. Crisis and crass are the same! Crass. rail. Crass. role. The BBC has been playing a crass role in peddling the crassly conceived ‘Crossrail’ scam for years. And the ‘Today’ programme, which this morning [Monday 17 March 2008] contained another pro-racist, parasitic and corrupting lie-piece in support of the ideology and the spin and propaganda for the occupation of Iraq by G W Bush, his Neo-Cons and assortments of parasites from all over the ‘developed’ regions of the world, failed to include any statement that would remotely suggest that in Iraq there are human beings who have been under a terrifying occupation for as long as they have been. The gloss put over the racist occupation of Iraq by the BBC was too much. There was no reference on the Radio 4 Today programme this morning to the correlation between capitalism, profit, greed, 'development' occupation and the banking crisis that has now begun to hit so many of the apparently unassailable ones in the USA. _May be the discussion would not be arousing enough for John Humphrys and Sarah Montague! So they minimised the truth on the banking crisis and were gagging to do an extended one on aspects of bonking, in the morning, on ‘radio four’ !_With such rampant propensity being exhibited by none other than John Humphrys – who has been elevated by the 'Daily Mail' Group at least, to a status of being the morality champion of ‘middle England’ – what chance is there of middle England being told the truth by any outlet on domestic BBC?_[To be continued]
?
[?
[?
[
Crossrail hole in Whitechapel - how Ken Livingstone is linked by donation with Gerald Ronson, one of the ‘Guinness Four’, a fraudster who served jail for six months, gave Ken Livingstone cash donation in 2004 and a theatre ticket worth more than £150.00 in 2006
the full story - on this site later today. The story has been published by Rupert Murdoch's London Sunday Times today Sunday 16 March 2008
_AADHIKARonline quoting the London Independent on Sunday [16 March 2008] web site describing the role of the TEXAS, USA, man Cliff Mumm in the multi-Billion £ Iraq, UK contracts, including Sellafield and Crossrail. And also stating, as if there is no ‘House of Lords Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill’ being involved far less the ‘House of Lords as a whole being entitled to any say or relevant to having any say on the contents, the purpose and the implications of the ‘Crossrail Bill’!
_AADHIKARonline quoting the London Independent on Sunday [16 March 2008] web site describing the role of the TEXAS, USA, man Cliff Mumm in the multi-Billion £ Iraq, UK contracts, including Sellafield and Crossrail. And also stating, as if there is no ‘House of Lords Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill’ being involved far less the ‘House of Lords as a whole being entitled to any say or relevant to having any say on the contents, the purpose and the implications of the ‘CrossRail Bill’!
_Iraq to UK: a Texan tale
Having rebuilt Iraq, it seems Cliff Mumm (right), a senior vice-president at US giant Bechtel, is set on doing the same for the UK. _The Texan, who led Bechtel's $2.3bn (£1.1bn) contract to repair Iraq's infrastructure, is back in the UK having received a CBE for rescuing the £4.5bn Jubilee Line extension on London's Underground. Mumm is leading Bechtel's bid, due next month, for the £20bn contract to decommission Sellafield and he is advising on the construction of the £16bn Crossrail scheme, which is expected to get Royal Assent in the summer. _
By©Muhammad Haque
1044 Hrs GMT London Saturday 15 March 2008
The Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the ‘Crossrail hole Bill’ has been ‘in contact’ with the bureaucracy in the UK ‘legislative’ ‘House of Lords’ in Westminster since the first half of November 2007.
The contacts have been solely to do with the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the ‘hybrid’ piece of ‘draft’ legislation, called the ‘Crossrail Bill’ that is now [15 March 2008] in that ‘House’. The facts and the evidence of the attitude of the < bureaucracy, the agenda of the bureaucracy and the antics of the bureaucracy [to date] have been so telling about just how total has been – is- the morass in the ‘Mother of Parliaments’ that it is absolutely important and necessary to examine the condition in some detail. Before starting the ‘reporting' of the ‘proceedings’ so far of the 'House of Lords Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill'__In the NECESSARY detail._Before anything can be said about the formal ‘proceedings’ that will make sense_In context. I therefore begin with a brief look at the conduct of Oliver Cromwell___’Good old Oliver Cromwell’! Why had Oliver Cromwell scrapped the ‘House of Lords’? __Was THAT an act of irrationality and insanity for which Cromwell could be denounced? Or did he do it because the ‘House of Lords’ was indeed a ‘House’ that was in the grip of parasites? __Parliamentary parasites! _Parasites holding 'parliament to ransom’? Parasites impersonating the personnel in place allegedly to make parliament the peoples' platform?????? _
[To be continued]
_Khoodeelaar! set to challenge the unconstitutional conduct in the UK ‘House of lords’ ‘CROSSRAIL Hole Bill ‘Select Committee’ – more here starting 1100 Hrs GMT Saturday 15 MARCH 2008
The following report will now be published at the weekend.
Today [13 March 2008] in the UK Parliament: Khoodeelaar campaigners Say NO to Crossrail hole Bill ...... Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area CAMPAIGN against the CROSSRAIL HOLE plot [‘formally’ known as] the ‘Crossrail Bill’ the ‘hybrid’ piece of draft [‘daft’!] legislation contrived and peddled at the prompting of Big Business/capitalist City of London Interests and now in the UK legislative ‘HOUSE OF LORDS’ where 113 objections to it put from across London including from the East End of London are being ‘considered’ …_
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Does Nick Clegg have the guts to challenge Crossrail agenda? Does Clegg have the sense to back Alan Beith who has just created a record?!
By Muhammad Haque
1830 GMT
19 march 2008
Does Nick Clegg have the guts to challenge Crossrail agenda? Does Clegg have the sense to back Alan Beith who has just created a record! by being the only Lib Dem MP to speak against the Big Business Crossrall scam?
More here shortly
Below is how Beith's local news outlet BERWICK ADVERTISER has been reporting his comments against CROSSRAIL scam:
Budget offers no help to the poorest, says Berwick MP
By ADAM DRUMMOND
BERWICK'S Lib Dem MP Alan Beith has slammed the Chancellor's first Budget, saying it offers nothing to help our poorest families in the north east.
Alan Beith said: "The Chancellor's Budget Box is nearly empty and he has offered nothing to help families or the elderly with increasing energy and food costs. This is the budget when the Government gave up on its 2010 child poverty target. By their own calculations it will be putting only an additional £1bn into combating child poverty around the UK, £2.5bn less than is needed to meet its target.
"This was also a golden opportunity for the Brown-Darling team to tackle persistent inequality caused by the Barnett formula, which means that more money is available in Scotland for public services than here in the north east.
"The only big winner from this budget is the Government; by 2010 they will be keeping an extra £1.86bn for themselves."
Mr Beith also condemned the Government's lack of commitment to improving transport links in the north east.
He added: "The effect of London's Crossrail arrangement is to give Scotland another half a billion pounds to spend as it chooses, but nothing comes to the north east. The Chancellor is crowing about Crossrail and other transport projects but singularly fails to give a single case of better transport here .
"The Crossrail example clearly shows how we are missing out yet again because of the Barnett formula, which even Professor Barnett has said should be scrapped."
Anne-Marie Trevelyan, parliamentary spokesman for the Conservatives, delivered her verdict on the Budget.
Anne-Marie said: "The cost of living is rising fast, but Gordon Brown's Government has added to it with a barrage of new stealth taxes. This is a bad news Budget that adds £110 a year to the tax bill for families across Northumberland.
"Any extra taxes on alcohol or cars should be offset by tax cuts elsewhere, but Labour has just used them as an excuse to raise more money for Gordon Brown's coffers. Taxes and borrowing are up because the Government failed to use the good years to prepare for the bad years."
The North East Chamber of Commerce (NECC), which represents 4,500 members that collectively employ a third of the regional workforce, said the move to freeze fuel duty was important in the face of rapidly rising prices at the pumps.
Andrew Sugden, NECC director of membership and policy said: "This was a Budget that was both unspectacular and unsurprisingly thin on substance when it came to improving the environment for business growth.
"However, the Chancellor's decision to delay the planned fuel duty rise was vitally important as the impact on industry would have been significant at a time when the economy is facing turbulent times. With no expectations of a price drop in oil prices in the short term, we would anticipate that Alistair Darling has only delayed a difficult decision that should be scrapped.
"Small and medium sized firms were handed tax relief aimed at boosting SME investment which will be beneficial. Again, though, it comes in the wake of a tax hit when Mr Darling tinkered to disastrous effect with Capital Gains Tax.
"Unfortunately, what we are seeing is continued confusion for the business community at a time when greater stability is needed. What firms are gaining on the swings, they are losing or have already lost on the roundabouts."
Last Updated: 19 March 2008 1:21 PM
Access to external web pages may not be established from these AADHIKARonline pages. Try to access sites that are listed by description or by URL
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
0010 Hrs GMT London Sunday 23 march 2008: Khoodeelaar! no to ‘‘Crossrail’ hole plotter’ ‘undone mayor’ ken Livingstone, tells the times online that their critical report [by-line Martin Ivens] on Gordon Brown’s Crossrall hole-con-ken burden vindicates the Khoodeelaar! analysis and advice to Gordon Brown:
Brown should drop both ‘Crossrail’ and Ken Livingstone right now!
Mr Ivens has got the predicament and the foolishness of Gordon brown about right.
Mostly so about the over-hyped, over-sold and overdue for the scrapheap ‘‘Crossrail’’ scam.
Khoodeelaar! the campaign in defence of the east end of london and against the ‘‘Crossrail’’ hole bill [now in the uk legislative ‘house of lords’ as the ‘‘‘Crossrail’’ bill’], has been saying since January 2004 that the main criteria on which the validly of any public sector scheme of the cost-intensive nature and size of the plotted ‘‘Crossrail’’ was to be sought in the economic sphere.
Khoodeelaar! has been saying since January 2004 that there is objectively verifiable economic case made for ‘‘Crossrail’’….
Incredibly, even rod Eddington, the ‘expert’ whom chancellor Gordon brown had appointed to do a rep[ort on the future of the railways in the UK advised against ‘‘Crossrail’’ [as reported in October 2007 by channel 4 news].
‘‘Crossrail’’ will waste a lot of money that the badly off public and social sectors in the UK c could put to very good and beneficial use…
Besides, the ‘‘‘Crossrail’ Bill’ is being pushed through parliament in a most unconstitutional way. if our planned constitutional law challenge succeeds then who will account for the hundreds of £millions of public money that has already been given to unaccountable ‘‘Crossrail’’ company [CLRL] already?
A really prudent Gordon brown would drop ‘‘Crossrail’’ and the liability of a Livingstone right now
__________________________________________________
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article3602855.ece
Khoodeelaar! No to Crassrail plugging Lyingstill Ken Livingstone quoting the full texts of the online piece by Martin Ivens as published on the Timesonline at 2310 Hrs GMT on Saturday 22 March 2008.
The piece is consistent with the main comments that Khoodeelaar! Has made from the start of the campaign against the Crossrall hole plotting propaganda of Ken Livingstone.
Khoodeelaar! Said in January 2004 that the main criteria on which the validly of any public sector scheme of the cost-intensive nature and size of the plotted Crossrail was to be sought in the economic sphere.
Khoodeelaar! Has said since January 2004 that there was NO objectively verifiable ECONOMIC case made for Crossrail….
[To be continued]
Gordon Brown’s fate is to find his future tied to Ken Livingstone
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article3602855.ece
“From The Sunday Times
March 23, 2008
Gordon Brown’s fate is to find his future tied to Ken Livingstone
Martin Ivens
Paris was well worth a mass, said a future king of France, the Protestant Henry of Navarre. Gordon Brown is prepared to give up a lot more to hang on to London. Why, he’ll even convert to Ken Livingstone’s cause.
It was a sign of desperate times last week that the prime minister ended one of the most bitter feuds in Labour history by sharing a platform with his old enemy. He is “an inspirational figure in London, a crusading mayor and one who has made a difference”, said Brown. This reconciliation brings to mind the Low cartoon of Hitler’s 1939 pact with Stalin. The Nazi dictator hails his new friend: “The scum of the earth, I believe?” The Soviet tyrant returns the greeting: “The bloody assassin of the workers, I presume?”
Until recently Brown wouldn’t speak Livingstone’s name in the Commons, simply referring to him as “the mayor”. Ten years ago Ken wrote an article accusing Brown of creating a mini-recession in London. The two scrapped like dogs over the-then chancellor’s bungled private-public administration of the Tube. The puritanical Scotsman and the newt-loving friend of Sinn Fein were always polar opposites.
If the Tories take the capital in May then Brown’s bad run will become a rout. London, with all its juicy marginals seats, is a prize indeed. The mayor’s job also provides a platform for an assault on the government’s national policies. A Sunday Times/ YouGov poll last week put the Conservatives 16 points ahead of Labour.
Further midweek polling confirmed an ominous trend that could no longer be dismissed by No 10 spinners as “rogue”. In London, the Tory candidate, Boris Johnson, has also opened up a 12-point lead over Livingstone. The vagaries of second preference votes mean a Conservative victory is by no means assured, but Gordon and Ken know they have to hang together for fear of hanging separately.
South of a line running from the Avon to the Wash, the party controls only two councils outside wobbly London. Labour is back to the bad old days of “southern discomfort”. New Labour was born in 1992 after a fourth successive defeat convinced the young team of Brown/Blair that the party would stay out in the cold forever if it had nothing to say to the aspirant middle classes in the south. Has Gordon lost them once again?
A small swing at the next election against Labour could destroy the southern and metropolitan gains first made in 1997. “We have to win in seats across the southeast . . . as well as Sunderland,” pleaded Hazel Blears, the Blairite communities secretary, at a forum hosted by the pressure groups Progress and Compass last week. Our front-page story reveals that another Blairite, Charles Clarke, the former home secretary, is e-mailing a “doomsday scenario” to southern Labour MPs. The movement of just 7,500 votes in 24 southern marginals, he says, could wipe out a swathe of small Labour majorities that will be cut by boundary changes. As Corporal Jones of Dad’s Army would say: “Don’t panic!”
The polls and a badly received budget have made gloomy reading for the government. Cold winds from America have blown in economic uncertainty. The prime minister has told us that Britain is “better placed to withstand global instability than any other country in Europe”. He may be right. But meanwhile the headlines are awful. Inflationary rises in energy and council taxes, and a sudden rise in remortgaging charges have soured middle England.
Alistair Darling pleaded that the credit crunch is all the fault of foreigners. Perhaps he needs to sound a bit more Franklin Roosevelt – “the only thing we have to fear is fear itself”– and a bit less Herbert Hoover, who ushered in the great depression. The trouble with citing international comparisons is that they are not wholly flattering to Britain. “Compare the do-nothing budget here with what is going on in the US,” charge the Tories. “Look at the speedy rescue of Bear Stearns by JP Morgan. Bear Stearns had far more complicated global transactions than Northern Rock’s.”
In London the financial authorities failed to encourage Lloyds TSB to take over Northern Rock and later, when they actively sought a buyer, found no takers. Billions of dollars in tax breaks are being given to American consumers to lift their spirits while there are talks between Congress and the US president about propping up the housing market. Our efforts here look positively lethargic.
Many Labour MPs look for a silver lining. The polls do not show a stampede from Labour to the Tories but only a falling off in bedrock support. “It’s still ours to lose,” says another backbencher, “and we are proving quite good at losing it.”
When asked by the priest on his deathbed to renounce Satan, Voltaire rejoined: “This is no time to be making enemies.” Brown has picked an odd moment to pick a quarrel with God’s representatives in Britain. Easter will ring to denunciations from pulpits across the country of his “monstrous” plans to whip his MPs behind a bill to allow hybrid human-animal embryos. It is a row that could lose him three Roman Catholic members of his cabinet. His response to these problems is a corporate makeover and a change of personnel, though the critics demand something more radical.
Chancellor Brown’s operation at No 11 was famously tight and clannish. Now there is unease at No 10 as the new company systems man, chief of staff Stephen Carter, flexes his muscles. Out go old retainers such as Gordon’s pollster, Spencer Livermore. In come new suits like David Muir, the advertising guru.
Most Labour figures I speak to discount No 10 reshuffles as so much froth, but the Conservatives are jubilant. “You get great headlines when you bring in new people to the heart of a political operation, but it can be very destabilising,” says one. A top Tory gloats: “For 14 to 15 years I have been on the receiving end of advice telling us we need an Alastair Campbell figure. Now I read that Gordon Brown needs a Steve Hilton [Cameron’s strategy boss] or an Andy Coulson [his press chief].”
Brown is in a hole. A deluge of activity between Christmas and Easter has petered out with the polls back to nowhere. Dependability during times of trouble was his trump card. Now Cameron and George Osborne, the shadow chancellor, have overtaken Brown and Darling on stewardship of the economy. One of Brown’s Labour critics argues that the economy itself is not the problem: “He’s broadly in the right place. The message: ‘I’ve been chancellor for 10 years, I’m the guy with the experience and we’ve been through these things before, I can get you through them again,’ is fine.” Nor are the process and organisation of No 10 the problem. “It’s the mission.”
Brown thinks he’s got a long time. but although the election is likely to be in 2010 an economic downturn means political recovery lags a long way behind. “Say what you like about Tony but even his enemies knew what he stood for. What do we stand for now?” One Cabinet minister apparently worried about it to Brown’s face.
And what if Labour’s southern discomfort turns into northern exposure? There is still little enthusiasm for the Tories above the Avon-Wash line. The Conservative spring conference in Gateshead a week ago was a muted affair without wider resonance in the region. But nowadays there is little of the rancid hostility to the party that attached to it in the days of Margaret Thatcher and John Major. My friends in the north tell me fears of a recession have brought gloom, restaurants half empty at weekends and worries of worse to come.
In this climate Labour’s loyal core support won’t defect to the other side. It might not turn out at all. No wonder last week the Tories were crowing that Brown has reached a turning point.
London’s election day, May 1, is his opportunity to stop the rot. But the prime minister can help his new friend Livingstone only so much. Ken is Ken, a maverick whose fortunes go up or down according to his erratic behaviour and the antics of his wild friends. He is only semidetached Labour at best. It’s an odd twist of fate that puts Gordon’s future in his hands.”
___________________________________________________
AADHIKARonline
Editor©Muhammad Haque
The 8th edition of the day of the AADHIKAROnline london uk was updated at 2220 Hrs GMT on Friday 21 March 2008
Even Gordon Brown must know that he cannot go on uttering Blairing lies now that he, Gordon Brown, is in actual occupation of the office that the Bliar did occupy for a good 10 years!!! So why did Gordon Brown make the desperate packaged performances to Ken Livingstone’s career-prompted tunes?
[To be continued]
Click here for the latest contents of the Khoodeelaar! manifesto 2008 against ken Livingstone and against Livingstone’s egotistic wasteful adventure and CRoSSRAIL hole plot - continuing the Khoodeelaar! response to Gordon Brown who was again touted into the Crassrail hole plot propaganda manipulation by the crafty, confidence-trickster ken Lyingstill Livingstone..._the embarrassing display of Gordon Brown almost looking like Mr bean as he held his left arm aloft to give support to the over-zealous right arm of the insecure and the conniving ken Livingstone…. _the moment of Gordon Brown looking Mr bean as he played the part o Mr bean was witnessed ‘on location’ in ‘canary wharf’ where a few more such ‘moments’ of crassness were on view. witnesses have confirmed that Gordon Brown did not succeed in selling the career plan and agenda of ken Livingstone even to those ‘invited’ collection of time-serving career minded ‘faithfuls’ along side the choice selection of simplified sleepwalkers programmed to serve the zombie-master who promised to bribe them to their greed contents_one allegedly ‘proper’ university-awarded ‘graduate’ moaned that she could not get a job. due to the discrimination that was enveloping the corrupted canary wharf and its socially and otherwise ‘gated’ island sited on the image of the former isle of dogs _before the dirty dancing promotion of ken Livingstone’s ego and career day ended, the ‘complaining’ female ‘graduate’ was approached with suitable preferment and opportunity!!!!! _AADHIKAROnline will complete this weekend the report on Gordon Brown’s embarrassing day at canary wharf __returning to Brown’s endorsement of the ego of the very insecure ken Livingstone as confessed to the london evening standard [as published on Thursday 20 March 2008], we shall take that recorded item of immorality and irresponsibility apart, seam by every lying seam. We started our response to Gordon Brown at 1700 hrs GMT yesterday Thursday 20 march 2008. _On this link will also appear, later on this weekend the next sets of the Khoodeelaar! No to 'Crossrail hole Bill’ CAMPAIGN breaking news, this weekend continuing with the key reports on the conduct of the ‘legislative’ ‘ upper chamber’ [query this!!!!!!!!] [‘House of Lords’ at ‘Westminster’, London SW1] ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’, Khoodeelaar! Campaign news updates against the Crassrail hole Bill draft legislation, Khoodeelaar! Campaign against ‘Crossrail hole Bill agenda’ statements and Khoodeelaar! No to ‘Crossrail hole Bill Big Business agenda’ CAMPAIGN action announcements…..
_And a new AADHIKARonline feature examining the festering lobby-touts for Big Business that are finishing off all remaining pretences of a ‘democratic’ ‘parliament’ ‘of’ the UK as is ‘housed’ in the ‘Palace of Westminster’!!!!!!
AADHIKARonline in association with Khoodeelaar! CAMPAIGN against the Crossrail hole plot, is today [Thursday 20 march 2008] introducing another phrase we have devised in context to accurately describe the crass role being played for Big Business by the Uk ‘Houses of parliament’. It was described until the AADHIKARonline editions as published on 19 March 2008 as a ‘draft’ piece of legislation. From this morning [Thursday 20 March 2008] onwards, the ‘draft’ piece of [Crassrail hole Bill] legislation shall be also described as a ‘daft’ piece of legislation. And appropriate elaborative words, phrases and citations will be included as we continue to dissect the daft piece of legislation. The opposition to that crass, the daft piece of legislation is being organised by Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area CAMPAIGN against the CROSSRAIL HOLE plot [‘formally’ known as] the ‘Crossrail Bill’ the ‘hybrid’ piece of draft [‘daft’!] legislation contrived and peddled at the prompting of Big Business/capitalist City of London Interests and now in the UK legislative ‘HOUSE OF LORDS’ where 113 objections to it put from across London including from the East End of London are being ‘considered’ …And AADHIKAROnline along with the associated web sites, logs and other campaigning media, have been publishing the key evidence of the institutionalised misconduct to which the ‘Houses of Parliament’ have been lobby-ed into… by the elements of institutionalised and institutionalising corruption, sleaze, greed, profit , callousness, opportunism, careerism, deception and racism… We shall be focussing on the central flaws that make a mockery of the boast ‘Mother of Parliaments’. It is an offence against common sense to call that building ‘the mother’ of anything, if the word ‘mother’ means what it universally is associated with and is perceived to mean…._[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! This week in the UK “Houses of Parliament’ Saying No to Big Business Crossrail hole plot –___full reports and Khoodeelaar! Constitutional law commentaries due here and on the associated Khoodeelaar web sites throughout today Thursday 20 March 2008
Muhammad Haque ethical and economic commentary
1025 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 19 March 2008_
On the lies that are retailed via the BBC. Those lies are given the gloss of state-sponsored legitimacy for Big Business agenda as they are mouthed by John Humphrys on the BBC Radio 4 ‘Today’ programme – the man that has been installed as the BBC's marketing gimmick along side Jeremy Paxman. Between the two of them, it is said, there is no area of ethics, morality and integrity left unvoiced and unrepresented!……_That is the BBC’s marketing line for Paxman and Humphrys. _And that is a pack of lies. Lies that are linked directly with the peddling of ‘Canary Wharf’ for Crassrail. And all that that peddling entails at the expense of the ordinary people in the East End of London.
Just under two years ago, Canary Wharf Crossrail hole plotters lies were presented as ‘respectable fact’ on the BBC TV. _In the edition of ‘the Politics Show’ as broadcast on Sunday 26 March 2006, Bernard Gambrill was allowed to utter unchallenged and unexamined another grotesque lie. About thousands of jobs being created by Crassrail... But he neither showed the correlation nor could he show the correlation between job creation mouthing and the people in and of the East end of `London .…. That detached utterance and assertion was allowed to go unchallenged. _In the context of the events and the reality in March 2008, I shall be updating the Khoodeelaar! dissection of Bernard Gambrill's Crassrail lies. That examination will appear here later this week.
The BBC Radio 4 Today programme ‘stalwart’ John Humphrys lied for Crassrail hole plotting agenda couriers and peddlers. _So detached from reality was John Humphrys as he giggled like a hero-worshipper zombie uttering his servile ‘many thanks’ to his ‘American guest’, he left the clear impression that he, Humphrys is, must have been and was part of the Big Business lying Brigade pushing for the Crassrail hole scam. _Crassrail has been peddled as ‘crucial’ for the linking of ‘Canary Wharf’ with Heathrow [via the capitalist enclave called the City of London] . The Brigade that was actively engaged in the takeover of the land across what used to be the Isle of Dogs in the inner city London borough of Tower Hamlets…. _It is now subliminally packaged as ‘Canary Wharf’, to make the opportunity available for looters that instantly recognise ‘Canary Wharf’ as one of their very own class and capitalist signals….`_From Michael Heseltine [who was a faker as an alleged ‘nearly-liberal’ Conservative alternative to the vile Conservative ideology of Margaret Thatcher] who took the decisive steps and fronted the symbolic and structural assaults against the economic, social and environmental rights of the people [of ordinary East London neighbourhoods] for Big business when he was in the Thatchered UK administration and he [Hezza] degenerated the former Isle of Dogs and took the 'zone' out of the reach of the local people in the ordinary neighbourhoods of the East End of London. _Local, East End people were unable to afford the land around what is now 'Canary Wharf' [as a generic concept and a euphemism to denote the wider land on the Isle of Dogs] so it would be grabbed by the likes of the Reich Man ! What a name! _All the way from Canada ?! Reich Man !! Reich!!! Of course the Reichmann that fronted the takeover of the area would furiously deny any link with the notorious Third Reichers in the Germany of the past European century. He would join the opponents and critics of the Third Reich. _But he still would side with and be identified with the capitalist and takeover forces that are and will be as hostile to the needs of the people of the East End as many of the adherents of the Third Reich would have been. If the electoral programmes seen o the Isle of Dogs during the first half of the 1990s was anything to go by. _When the Third Reichists deployed on the 'Isle of Dogs' [1990-1994] were unable to make any sustained attack on the ‘democratic’ front, their real managers, the ‘capitalists’ Reich man, Reich MEN and Reich WOMEN moved in. and what has taken place on the `Isle of Dogs since the 1994 ‘local Tower Hamlets council election’ has been very much along the lines of social and economic apartheid in the East End of London___[To be continued]_Back to the BBC Radio 4 Today programme Wednesday 19 March 2008___Was that voice on the Radio 4 ‘Today’ programme that of Bechtel Cliff Mumm we suffered just a while ago this morning in the packaged propaganda piece for Big Business creepy confidence trick plugger with an almost Texan voice and accent ? __It was played at the expense of the truth [and by concealing the truth from the licence-paying members of the public in Britain] during the last few minutes of the BBC Radio 4 ‘Today’ programme this morning Wednesday 19 March 2008? _The vile, untruthful voice of lies uttered that he could not make a booking for lunch at Canary Wharf yesterday. Yesterday, Tuesday 18 March 2008. Whatever could he have wanted to refer to Canary Wharf for? The short answer is that he was comparing canary Wharf with a list of locations in the USA - where too he said there had been no sign of economic crisis, where people were spending their dosh as per usual, where the pace and the texture of consumption and indulgence was just as visible and discernible yesterday [Tuesday 18 March 2008] as it had been for the years that had gone by. _Humphrys had earlier ‘tackled’ a minor diplomat from the Chinese embassy in London over Tibet.__[To be continued]
. Khoodeelaar! No to the Crossrail hole plot campaign ‘in the legislative UK House of Lords’ [where the ‘hybrid’ ‘Crossrail Bill’ is being given the formal, bureaucratic effect of approval under the influence of Big Business which has taken over the ‘parliamentary bureaucracy’. AADHIKARonline is. Reporting on ‘the week of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against unconstitutionality in parliament – how the Bechtel-influenced UK department for transport [DfT] has sabotaged whatever there might have been of ‘independence’ in the ‘legislative’ ‘house of lords’’
. how there is the eerie similarity between the lies as recorded in the proceedings, starting at paragraph 3382 of the ‘house of lords Crossrail bill’ ‘select committee’ and the lies in the crass corridors of Crossrail hole plotter Ken Livingstone’s ‘ Xxxxxy Hall’
. we publish the key Khoodeelaar! Constitutional, legal and evidential communications as sent to the ‘house of lords’
. we publish the key e-mails sent to the ‘committee clerk’
. we publish the key e-mails sent by Khoodeelaar! To the pre-formal stage of the ‘Crossrail bill select committee’
. we publish the key e-mails sent to Ruth Kelly
. and the Khoodeelaar! Complaint to the ‘house of lords’ ‘management’
. and the Khoodeelaar! Grounds in constitutional law for the challenge in the European Human rights forum against the very thing, the entirety of the uk parliament which has been on the facts so far, in the grip of big business and not functioning at all as a sovereign parliament,- more like the parasitic banana republican stooge place…
.
‘Crassrail hole plotter Ken Con Lyingstill contaminates the process of democracy
_
’House of Lords’ is being treated as the ‘House of Lureds’!
More, here shortly
__View the latest Khoodeelaar! Report on ‘Today in Parliament’ focusing on the behaviour of the ‘House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee’, which is in formal session this month. These reports are being published by AADHIKAR Media Foundation and Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN, to show how the UK Parliament has been in paralysis under pressure from parasites purchased by Big Business and placed in the parliamentary bureaucracy to get the unconstitutional Crossrail hole Bill through_[To be continued]
BBC ‘flagship’ ‘news and current affairs’ programme ‘Today’ exceeds the limits of indecency and over hypes bonking instead of explaining the deep crisis in western capitalist banking
The Muhammad Haque ethical commentary
1105 Hrs GMT London Monday 17 March 2008
Shocking News! The BBC actually lets listeners to the ‘Today’ programme hear a bit of the truth about the capitalist banking system being in quite a serious crisis! _Being party to the imperialist occupation policies of the G W Bush and the Neo-Cons' enterprise, the BBC of course, failed to mention the full facts. And they most certainly did not refer to the ‘Texan Mumm!’ _. Of Bechtel! The same edition of the BBC Radio 4 ‘Today’ programme [Monday 17 March 2008] did make sub-pornographic references and even staged pornographic ‘discussion’ flaunted by a giggling John Humphrys who was sounding as if he was enjoying the excuse to aim his ‘sexual’ ‘arousal’ references at co-presenter Sara[h] Montague under the guises of ‘information’ pieces. But they did not want the ‘middle English’ listeners to be ‘frightened’ by being told the truth about the costs of collusion with criminal excesses of latent capitalist imperialism..._How many letters are there in the ‘English’ language word ‘crisis’? Let’s count them: six letters. There is only one letter that makes ‘crisis’ ‘different’ from ‘crass’. In all other relevant details, both words, ‘crisis’ and ‘crass’ signify the same thing in effect. And they do the SAME thing in this context. Crisis and crass are the same! Crass. rail. Crass. role. The BBC has been playing a crass role in peddling the crassly conceived ‘Crossrail’ scam for years. And the ‘Today’ programme, which this morning [Monday 17 March 2008] contained another pro-racist, parasitic and corrupting lie-piece in support of the ideology and the spin and propaganda for the occupation of Iraq by G W Bush, his Neo-Cons and assortments of parasites from all over the ‘developed’ regions of the world, failed to include any statement that would remotely suggest that in Iraq there are human beings who have been under a terrifying occupation for as long as they have been. The gloss put over the racist occupation of Iraq by the BBC was too much. There was no reference on the Radio 4 Today programme this morning to the correlation between capitalism, profit, greed, 'development' occupation and the banking crisis that has now begun to hit so many of the apparently unassailable ones in the USA. _May be the discussion would not be arousing enough for John Humphrys and Sarah Montague! So they minimised the truth on the banking crisis and were gagging to do an extended one on aspects of bonking, in the morning, on ‘radio four’ !_With such rampant propensity being exhibited by none other than John Humphrys – who has been elevated by the 'Daily Mail' Group at least, to a status of being the morality champion of ‘middle England’ – what chance is there of middle England being told the truth by any outlet on domestic BBC?_[To be continued]
?
[?
[?
[
Crossrail hole in Whitechapel - how Ken Livingstone is linked by donation with Gerald Ronson, one of the ‘Guinness Four’, a fraudster who served jail for six months, gave Ken Livingstone cash donation in 2004 and a theatre ticket worth more than £150.00 in 2006
the full story - on this site later today. The story has been published by Rupert Murdoch's London Sunday Times today Sunday 16 March 2008
_AADHIKARonline quoting the London Independent on Sunday [16 March 2008] web site describing the role of the TEXAS, USA, man Cliff Mumm in the multi-Billion £ Iraq, UK contracts, including Sellafield and Crossrail. And also stating, as if there is no ‘House of Lords Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill’ being involved far less the ‘House of Lords as a hole being entitled to any say or relevant to having any say on the contents, the purpose and the implications of the ‘Crossrail Bill’!
_AADHIKARonline quoting the London Independent on Sunday [16 March 2008] web site describing the role of the TEXAS, USA, man Cliff Mumm in the multi-Billion £ Iraq, UK contracts, including Sellafield and Crossrail. And also stating, as if there is no ‘House of Lords Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill’ being involved far less the ‘House of Lords as a hole being entitled to any say or relevant to having any say on the contents, the purpose and the implications of the ‘CrossRail Bill’!
_Iraq to UK: a Texan tale
Having rebuilt Iraq, it seems Cliff Mumm (right), a senior vice-president at US giant Bechtel, is set on doing the same for the UK. _The Texan, who led Bechtel's $2.3bn (£1.1bn) contract to repair Iraq's infrastructure, is back in the UK having received a CBE for rescuing the £4.5bn Jubilee Line extension on London's Underground. Mumm is leading Bechtel's bid, due next month, for the £20bn contract to decommission Sellafield and he is advising on the construction of the £16bn Crossrail scheme, which is expected to get Royal Assent in the summer. _
By©Muhammad Haque
1044 Hrs GMT London Saturday 15 March 2008
The Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the ‘Crossrail hole Bill’ has been ‘in contact’ with the bureaucracy in the UK ‘legislative’ ‘House of Lords’ in Westminster since the first half of November 2007.
The contacts have been solely to do with the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the ‘hybrid’ piece of ‘draft’ legislation, called the ‘Crossrail Bill’ that is now [15 March 2008] in that ‘House’. The facts and the evidence of the attitude of the < bureaucracy, the agenda of the bureaucracy and the antics of the bureaucracy [to date] have been so telling about just how total has been – is- the morass in the ‘Mother of Parliaments’ that it is absolutely important and necessary to examine the condition in some detail. Before starting the ‘reporting' of the ‘proceedings’ so far of the 'House of Lords Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill’ in the NECESSARY detail. Before anything can be said about the formal ‘proceedings’ that will make sense In context I therefore begin with a brief look at the conduct of Oliver Cromwell___’Good old Oliver’!_Why had Oliver Cromwell scrapped the ‘House of Lords’? __Was THAT an act of irrationality and insanity for which Cromwell could be denounced? Or did he do it because the ‘House of Lords’ was indeed a ‘House’ that was in the grip of parasites? __Parliamentary parasites! _Parasites holding 'parliament to ransom'?_Parasites impersonating the personnel in place allegedly to make parliament the peoples' platform?????? _
[To be continued]
_Khoodeelaar! set to challenge the unconstitutional conduct in the UK ‘House of lords’ ‘CROSSRAIL Hole Bill ‘Select Committee’ – more here starting 1100 Hrs GMT Saturday 15 MARCH 2008
The following report will now be published at the weekend.
Today [13 March 2008] in the UK Parliament: Khoodeelaar campaigners Say NO to Crossrail hole Bill. Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area CAMPAIGN against the CROSSRAIL HOLE plot [‘formally’ known as] the ‘Crossrail Bill’ the ‘hybrid’ piece of draft [‘daft’!] legislation contrived and peddled at the prompting of Big Business/capitalist City of London Interests and now in the UK legislative ‘HOUSE OF LORDS’ where 113 objections to it put from across London including from the East End of London are being ‘considered’ …
__________________________________________________
By©Muhammad Haque
Muhammad Haque daily ethical commentary on the state and society in Blaired Britain fronted by Gordon Brown: London [‘Good Friday’ of the Christian Easter religious week] 1545 Hrs GMT Friday 21 March 2008:
The daily express and the daily star owned by Richard Desmond [whom the Richard Ingrams-Paul Foot-founded ‘private eye’ calls ‘dirty desmond’], have carried two prominent items on their front pages this week. Their abject grovelling apology to the ‘Mccans’ and their really dirty attacks on Heather McCartney….
This conduct raises many questions….
Contrast the Dirty One’s confessions over the mccans with his continuing attacks on Heather McCartney. Notice how Desmond’s two tabloid titles have mounted a reinforced attack of violent denunciation of the woman even as they were pretending to be reporting the final stage of Heather’s divorce action with Paul McCartney.
Their willingness to unite against Heather in that same way and with such unconcealed words and display of hatred cannot, surely, be in keeping with the words of apology they record towards the legal team of the McCans…..
The ‘unprecedented publication of apology on their front pages to the mccans’ by the two titles, the Daily Express and the Daily Star, have been much discussed by the moronic ‘media experts’ typified by the slumberous Roy Greenslow. But most of those ‘analyses’ left out the subject titles’ venomous attacks on Heather McCartney on the same front pages on the same date in the same editions!
Whatever must have given them the gall to run those headlines and those poisonous personal attacks on Heather McCartney, the message they are giving in those attacks is this: that the tabloid press RESERVE and ASSERT the right [!!!!] to “the freedom of the tabloid press which is the freedom from morality, ethics and accuracy... “.
Where is the ‘National Union of Journalists’ at a time such as this?
May be the NUJ doesn’t exist.
Com to think of it, the NUJ never does exist when groups of its alleged members behave like hordes of criminals let loose on people they perceive to be unable to defend themselves.
The NUJ is just as much to blame as the tabloid titles, which are written, edited and promoted by NUJ members – and by members of their sister trade unions.
Most of the time. On most occasions.
So what is it that causes the morass in the NUJ at tough and critical times?
[To be continued]
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Muhammad Haque asks at 1918 Hrs GMT Thursday 20 March 2008:
Is Gordon Brown putting on the fake smile because his aides are confirming in his earphone that Livingstone is looking decidedly glum and is wearing a more fake smile than Brown himself - thus signalling to Brown's 'well-wishers' [the shrinking group that is getting smaller by the second] that Brown has punctured Livingstone's careerist arrogance and vanity... What paragraph of Livingstone's condemnation of Brown in the London Independent [the London print newspaper] in the 1990s is Brown remembering as he is standing there as the 'big savior' of Livingstone's sinking electoral ship...?????.!!!!
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! No to Gordon Brown repeating discredited Ken Livingstone’s Crassrail hole plot lies - More, here, next
Coming here later today, Thursday 20 March 2008
Khoodeelaar! Item-by-item response to Gordon Brown's ill-advised and misleading promotion of Crassrail Ken Livingstone in the London 'EVERNING STANDARD'
_____________________________________________________
Muhammad Haque at 1400 hrs 20 March 2008 asks: Is Ken Livingstone rushing to re-hire Bob Kiley, with the 'USA perspective' on things, so Kiley can re-invigorate the housing 'boom' which will take place following the predicted crash and be promoted by Livingstone as yet another World CLASS CRASH that he will link to the wonders of Crossrail...?
COMING here during Thursday 20 March 2008 are the following:-
Coming here on AADHIKARonline: Latest Khoodeelaar! Report on the misconduct and the lies being told in the ‘House of Lords’ by Big Business stooges...
Latest Khoodeelaar! Report on the misconduct and the lies being told in the ‘House of Lords’ by the stooges of Big Business CRoSSRAIL hole Bill plot and agendas
Khoodeelaar! Exposing the latest pack of Ken Lyingstill Livingstone's crass lies on Transport at the expense of the people of London
And another AADHIKARonline insight into the lying unit at the Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole-inviting Council’s ‘major projects’ fabrication - we ask, what on earth was `Owen Whalley', the main man fronting the Tower Hamlets Council’s major disasters plots, dong in that little room in the ‘House of Lords’? Was he there to hear the list of allegations against him being read out or presented to the ‘House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee’? And who was going to read out the allegations against Owen Whalley ? And what, exactly, had he prepared for the ‘Lords’ to ‘read’ in that note that he shiftily passed to one of the bureaucrats?
[To be continued]
__________________________________________________
The 4th Edition of the day of the AADHIKAROnline London UK was updated at 0915 Hrs GMT on Thursday 20 March 2008
CLICK HERE for the latest Khoodeelaar! No to 'Crossrail hole Bill’ breaking campaign news, this week continuing with the key reports on the conduct of the ‘legislative’ ‘ upper chamber’ [query this!!!!!!!!] [‘House of Lords’ at ‘Westminster’, London SW1] ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’, Khoodeelaar! campaign news updates against the Crassrail hole Bill draft legislation, Khoodeelaar! campaign against ‘Crossrail hole Bill agenda’ statements and Khoodeelaar! No to ‘Crossrail hole Bill agenda’ action announcements….. And a new AADHIKARonline feature examining the festering lobby-touts for Big Business that are finishing off all remaining pretences of a ‘democratic’ ‘parliament’ ‘of’ the UK as is ‘housed’ in the ‘Palace of Westminster’!!!!!!
AADHIKARonline is today introducing in association with Khoodeelaar! another phrase to accurately describe the crass role being played fro Big Business by the Uk ‘Houses of parliament’. It was described until the AADHIKARonline editions as published on 19 March 2008 as a ‘draft’ piece of legislation. From this morning [Thursday 20 March 2008] onwards, the ‘draft’ piece of [Crassrail hole Bill] legislation shall be also described as a ‘daft’ piece of legislation. And appropriate elaborative words, phrases and citations will be included as we continue to dissect the daft piece of legislation. The opposition to that crass, the daft piece of legislation is being organised by Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area CAMPAIGN against the CROSSRAIL HOLE plot [‘formally’ known as] the ‘Crossrail Bill’ the ‘hybrid’ piece of draft [‘daft’!] legislation contrived and peddled at the prompting of Big Business/capitalist City of London Interests and now in the UK legislative ‘HOUSE OF LORDS’ where 113 objections to it put from across London including from the East End of London are being ‘considered’ …And AADHIKAROnline along with the associated web sites, logs and other campaigning media, have been publishing the key evidence of the institutionalized misconduct to which the ‘Houses of Parliament’ have been lobby-ed into… by the elements of institutionalised and institutionalising corruption, sleaze, greed, profit , callousness, opportunism, careerism, deception and racism… We shall be focussing on the central flaws that make a mockery of the boast ‘Mother of Parliaments’. It is an offence against common sense to call that building ‘the mother’ of anything, if the word ‘mother’ means what it universally is associated with and is perceived to mean….
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! This week in the UK “Houses of Parliament’ Saying No to Big Business Crossrail hole plot –___full reports and Khoodeelaar! constitutional law commentaries due here and on the associated Khoodeelaar web sites throughout today Thursday 20 March 2008
Muhammad Haque ethical and economic commentary
1025 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 19 March 2008_
on the lies that are retailed via the BBC. Those lies are given the gloss of state-sponsored legitimacy for Big Business agenda as they are mouthed by John Humphrys on the BBC Radio 4 ‘Today’ programme – the man that has been installed as the BBC's marketing gimmick along side Jeremy Paxman. Between the two of them, it is said, there is no area of ethics, morality and integrity left unvoiced and unrepresented!……_That is the BBC’s marketing line for Paxman and Humphrys. _And that is a pack of lies. Lies that are linked directly with the peddling of ‘Canary Wharf’ for Crassrail. And all that that peddling entails at the expense of the ordinary people in the East End of London.
Just under two years ago, Canary Wharf Crossrail hole plotters lies were presented as ‘respectable fact’ on the BBC TV. _In the edition of ‘the Politics Show’ as broadcast on Sunday 26 March 2006, Bernard Gambrill was allowed to utter unchallenged and unexamined another grotesque lie. About thousands of jobs being created by Crassrail... But he neither showed the correlation nor could he show the correlation between job creation mouthing and the people in and of the East end of `London .…. That detached utterance and assertion was allowed to go unchallenged. _In the context of the events and the reality in March 2008, I shall be updating the Khoodeelaar! dissection of Bernard Gambrill's Crassrail lies. That examination will appear here later this week.
The BBC Radio 4 Today programme ‘stalwart’ John Humphrys lied for Crassrail hole plotting agenda couriers and peddlers. _So detached from reality was John Humphrys as he giggled like a hero-worshipper zombie uttering his servile ‘many thanks’ to his ‘American guest’, he left the clear impression that he, Humphrys is, must have been and was part of the Big Business lying Brigade pushing for the Crassrail hole scam. _Crassrail has been peddled as ‘crucial’ for the linking of ‘Canary Wharf’ with Heathrow [via the capitalist enclave called the City of London] . The Brigade that was actively engaged in the takeover of the land across what used to be the Isle of Dogs in the inner city London borough of Tower Hamlets…. _It is now subliminally packaged as ‘Canary Wharf’, to make the opportunity available for looters that instantly recognise ‘Canary Wharf’ as one of their very own class and capitalist signals….`_From Michael Heseltine [who was a faker as an alleged ‘nearly-liberal’ Conservative alternative to the vile Conservative ideology of Margaret Thatcher] who took the decisive steps and fronted the symbolic and structural assaults against the economic, social and environmental rights of the people [of ordinary East London neighbourhoods] for Big business when he was in the Thatchered UK administration and he [Hezza] degenerated the former Isle of Dogs and took the 'zone' out of the reach of the local people in the ordinary neighbourhoods of the East End of London. _Local, East End people were unable to afford the land around what is now 'Canary Wharf' [as a generic concept and a euphemism to denote the wider land on the Isle of Dogs] so it would be grabbed by the likes of the Reich Man ! What a name! _All the way from Canada ?! Reich Man !! Reich!!! Of course the Reichmann that fronted the takeover of the area would furiously deny any link with the notorious Third Reichers in the Germany of the past European century. He would join the opponents and critics of the Third Reich. _But he still would side with and be identified with the capitalist and takeover forces that are and will be as hostile to the needs of the people of the East End as many of the adherents of the Third Reich would have been. If the electoral programmes seen o the Isle of Dogs during the first half of the 1990s was anything to go by. _When the Third Reichists deployed on the 'Isle of Dogs' [1990-1994] were unable to make any sustained attack on the ‘democratic’ front, their real managers, the ‘capitalists’ Reich man, Reich MEN and Reich WOMEN moved in.__And what has taken place on the `Isle of Dogs since the 1994 ‘local Tower Hamlets council election’ has been very much along the lines of social and economic apartheid in the East End of London___[To be continued]_Back to the BBC Radio 4 Today programme Wednesday 19 March 2008___Was that voice on the Radio 4 ‘Today’ programme that of Bechtel Cliff Mumm we suffered just a while ago this morning in the packaged propaganda piece for Big Business creepy confidence trick plugger with an almost Texan voice and accent ? __It was played at the expense of the truth [and by concealing the truth from the licence-paying members of the public in Britain] during the last few minutes of the BBC Radio 4 ‘Today’ programme this morning Wednesday 19 March 2008? _The vile, untruthful voice of lies uttered that he could not make a booking for lunch at Canary Wharf yesterday. Yesterday being Tuesday 18 March 2008. Whatever could he have wanted to refer to Canary Wharf for? The short answer is that he was comparing canary Wharf with a list of locations in the USA - where too he said there had been no sign of economic crisis, where people were spending their dosh as per usual, where the pace and the texture of consumption and indulgence was just as visible and discernible yesterday [Tuesday 18 March 2008] as it had been for the years that had gone by. _Humphrys had earlier ‘tackled’ a minor diplomat from the Chinese embassy in London over Tibet.__[To be continued]
. Khoodeelaar! No to the Crossrail hole plot campaign ‘in the legislative UK House of Lords’ [where the ‘hybrid’ ‘Crossrail Bill’ is being given the formal, bureaucratic effect of approval under the influence of Big Business which has taken over the ‘parliamentary bureaucracy’. AADHIKARonline is. Reporting on ‘the week of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against unconstitutionality in parliament – how the Bechtel-influenced UK department for transport [DfT] has sabotaged whatever there might have been of ‘independence’ in the ‘legislative’ ‘house of lords’’
. how there is the eerie similarity between the lies as recorded in the proceedings, starting at paragraph 3382 of the ‘house of lords Crossrail bill’ ‘select committee’ and the lies in the crass corridors of Crossrail hole plotter Ken Livingstone’s ‘ Xxxxxy Hall’
. we publish the key Khoodeelaar! Constitutional, legal and evidential communications as sent to the ‘house of lords’
. we publish the key e-mails sent to the ‘committee clerk’
. we publish the key e-mails sent by Khoodeelaar! To the pre-formal stage of the ‘Crossrail bill select committee’
. we publish the key e-mails sent to Ruth Kelly
. and the Khoodeelaar! Complaint to the ‘house of lords’ ‘management’
. and the Khoodeelaar! Grounds in constitutional law for the challenge in the European Human rights forum against the very thing, the entirety of the uk parliament which has been on the facts so far, in the grip of big business and not functioning at all as a sovereign parliament,- more like the parasitic banana republican stooge place…
.
‘Crassrail hole plotter Ken Con Lyingstill contaminates the process of democracy
_
’House of Lords’ is being treated as the ‘House of Lureds’!
More, here shortly
__View the latest Khoodeelaar! Report on ‘Today in Parliament’ focusing on the behaviour of the ‘House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee’, which is in formal session this month. These reports are being published by AADHIKAR Media Foundation and Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN, to show how the UK Parliament has been in paralysis under pressure from parasites purchased by Big Business and placed in the parliamentary bureaucracy to get the unconstitutional Crossrail hole Bill through_[
To be continued]
BBC ‘flagship’ ‘news and current affairs’ programme ‘Today’ exceeds the limits of indecency and over hypes bonking instead of explaining the deep crisis in western capitalist banking
The Muhammad Haque ethical commentary
1105 Hrs GMT London Monday 17 March 2008
Shocking News! The BBC actually lets listeners to the ‘Today’ programme hear a bit of the truth about the capitalist banking system being in quite a serious crisis! _Being party to the imperialist occupation policies of the G W Bush and the Neo-Cons' enterprise, the BBC of course, failed to mention the full facts. And they most certainly did not refer to the ‘Texan Mumm!’ _. Of Bechtel! The same edition of the BBC Radio 4 ‘Today’ programme [Monday 17 March 2008] did make sub-pornographic references and even staged pornographic ‘discussion’ flaunted by a giggling John Humphrys who was sounding as if he was enjoying the excuse to aim his ‘sexual’ ‘arousal’ references at co-presenter Sara[h] Montague under the guises of ‘information’ pieces. But they did not want the ‘middle English’ listeners to be ‘frightened’ by being told the truth about the costs of collusion with criminal excesses of latent capitalist imperialism..._How many letters are there in the ‘English’ language word ‘crisis’? Let’s count them: six letters. There is only one letter that makes ‘crisis’ ‘different’ from ‘crass’. In all other relevant details, both words, ‘crisis’ and ‘crass’ signify the same thing in effect. And they do the SAME thing in this context. Crisis and crass are the same! Crass. rail. Crass. role. The BBC has been playing a crass role in peddling the crassly conceived ‘Crossrail’ scam for years. And the ‘Today’ programme, which this morning [Monday 17 March 2008] contained another pro-racist, parasitic and corrupting lie-piece in support of the ideology and the spin and propaganda for the occupation of Iraq by G W Bush, his Neo-Cons and assortments of parasites from all over the ‘developed’ regions of the world, failed to include any statement that would remotely suggest that in Iraq there are human beings who have been under a terrifying occupation for as long as they have been. The gloss put over the racist occupation of Iraq by the BBC was too much. There was no reference on the Radio 4 Today programme this morning to the correlation between capitalism, profit, greed, 'development' occupation and the banking crisis that has now begun to hit so many of the apparently unassailable ones in the USA. _May be the discussion would not be arousing enough for John Humphrys and Sarah Montague! So they minimised the truth on the banking crisis and were gagging to do an extended one on aspects of bonking, in the morning, on ‘radio four’ !_With such rampant propensity being exhibited by none other than John Humphrys – who has been elevated by the 'Daily Mail' Group at least, to a status of being the morality champion of ‘middle England’ – what chance is there of middle England being told the truth by any outlet on domestic BBC?_[To be continued]
?
[?
[?
[
Crossrail hole in Whitechapel - how Ken Livingstone is linked by donation with Gerald Ronson, one of the ‘Guinness Four’, a fraudster who served jail for six months, gave Ken Livingstone cash donation in 2004 and a theatre ticket worth more than £150.00 in 2006
the full story - on this site later today. The story has been published by Rupert Murdoch's London Sunday Times today Sunday 16 March 2008
_AADHIKARonline quoting the London Independent on Sunday [16 March 2008] web site describing the role of the TEXAS, USA, man Cliff Mumm in the multi-Billion £ Iraq, UK contracts, including Sellafield and Crossrail. And also stating, as if there is no ‘House of Lords Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill’ being involved far less the ‘House of Lords as a whole being entitled to any say or relevant to having any say on the contents, the purpose and the implications of the ‘Crossrail Bill’!
_AADHIKARonline quoting the London Independent on Sunday [16 March 2008] web site describing the role of the TEXAS, USA, man Cliff Mumm in the multi-Billion £ Iraq, UK contracts, including Sellafield and Crossrail. And also stating, as if there is no ‘House of Lords Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill’ being involved far less the ‘House of Lords as a whole being entitled to any say or relevant to having any say on the contents, the purpose and the implications of the ‘CrossRail Bill’!
_Iraq to UK: a Texan tale
Having rebuilt Iraq, it seems Cliff Mumm (right), a senior vice-president at US giant Bechtel, is set on doing the same for the UK. _The Texan, who led Bechtel's $2.3bn (£1.1bn) contract to repair Iraq's infrastructure, is back in the UK having received a CBE for rescuing the £4.5bn Jubilee Line extension on London's Underground. Mumm is leading Bechtel's bid, due next month, for the £20bn contract to decommission Sellafield and he is advising on the construction of the £16bn Crossrail scheme, which is expected to get Royal Assent in the summer. _
By©Muhammad Haque
1044 Hrs GMT London Saturday 15 March 2008
The Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the ‘Crossrail hole Bill’ has been ‘in contact’ with the bureaucracy in the UK ‘legislative’ ‘House of Lords’ in Westminster since the first half of November 2007.
The contacts have been solely to do with the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the ‘hybrid’ piece of ‘draft’ legislation, called the ‘Crossrail Bill’ that is now [15 March 2008] in that ‘House’. The facts and the evidence of the attitude of the < bureaucracy, the agenda of the bureaucracy and the antics of the bureaucracy [to date] have been so telling about just how total has been – is- the morass in the ‘Mother of Parliaments’ that it is absolutely important and necessary to examine the condition in some detail. Before starting the ‘reporting' of the ‘proceedings’ so far of the 'House of Lords Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill'__In the NECESSARY detail._Before anything can be said about the formal ‘proceedings’ that will make sense_In context. I therefore begin with a brief look at the conduct of Oliver Cromwell___’Good old Oliver Cromwell’! Why had Oliver Cromwell scrapped the ‘House of Lords’? __Was THAT an act of irrationality and insanity for which Cromwell could be denounced? Or did he do it because the ‘House of Lords’ was indeed a ‘House’ that was in the grip of parasites? __Parliamentary parasites! _Parasites holding 'parliament to ransom’? Parasites impersonating the personnel in place allegedly to make parliament the peoples' platform?????? _
[To be continued]
_Khoodeelaar! set to challenge the unconstitutional conduct in the UK ‘House of lords’ ‘CROSSRAIL Hole Bill ‘Select Committee’ – more here starting 1100 Hrs GMT Saturday 15 MARCH 2008
The following report will now be published at the weekend.
Today [13 March 2008] in the UK Parliament: Khoodeelaar campaigners Say NO to Crossrail hole Bill ...... Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area CAMPAIGN against the CROSSRAIL HOLE plot [‘formally’ known as] the ‘Crossrail Bill’ the ‘hybrid’ piece of draft [‘daft’!] legislation contrived and peddled at the prompting of Big Business/capitalist City of London Interests and now in the UK legislative ‘HOUSE OF LORDS’ where 113 objections to it put from across London including from the East End of London are being ‘considered’ …_
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Does Nick Clegg have the guts to challenge Crossrail agenda? Does Clegg have the sense to back Alan Beith who has just created a record?!
By Muhammad Haque
1830 GMT
19 march 2008
Does Nick Clegg have the guts to challenge Crossrail agenda? Does Clegg have the sense to back Alan Beith who has just created a record! by being the only Lib Dem MP to speak against the Big Business Crossrall scam?
More here shortly
Below is how Beith's local news outlet BERWICK ADVERTISER has been reporting his comments against CROSSRAIL scam:
Budget offers no help to the poorest, says Berwick MP
By ADAM DRUMMOND
BERWICK'S Lib Dem MP Alan Beith has slammed the Chancellor's first Budget, saying it offers nothing to help our poorest families in the north east.
Alan Beith said: "The Chancellor's Budget Box is nearly empty and he has offered nothing to help families or the elderly with increasing energy and food costs. This is the budget when the Government gave up on its 2010 child poverty target. By their own calculations it will be putting only an additional £1bn into combating child poverty around the UK, £2.5bn less than is needed to meet its target.
"This was also a golden opportunity for the Brown-Darling team to tackle persistent inequality caused by the Barnett formula, which means that more money is available in Scotland for public services than here in the north east.
"The only big winner from this budget is the Government; by 2010 they will be keeping an extra £1.86bn for themselves."
Mr Beith also condemned the Government's lack of commitment to improving transport links in the north east.
He added: "The effect of London's Crossrail arrangement is to give Scotland another half a billion pounds to spend as it chooses, but nothing comes to the north east. The Chancellor is crowing about Crossrail and other transport projects but singularly fails to give a single case of better transport here .
"The Crossrail example clearly shows how we are missing out yet again because of the Barnett formula, which even Professor Barnett has said should be scrapped."
Anne-Marie Trevelyan, parliamentary spokesman for the Conservatives, delivered her verdict on the Budget.
Anne-Marie said: "The cost of living is rising fast, but Gordon Brown's Government has added to it with a barrage of new stealth taxes. This is a bad news Budget that adds £110 a year to the tax bill for families across Northumberland.
"Any extra taxes on alcohol or cars should be offset by tax cuts elsewhere, but Labour has just used them as an excuse to raise more money for Gordon Brown's coffers. Taxes and borrowing are up because the Government failed to use the good years to prepare for the bad years."
The North East Chamber of Commerce (NECC), which represents 4,500 members that collectively employ a third of the regional workforce, said the move to freeze fuel duty was important in the face of rapidly rising prices at the pumps.
Andrew Sugden, NECC director of membership and policy said: "This was a Budget that was both unspectacular and unsurprisingly thin on substance when it came to improving the environment for business growth.
"However, the Chancellor's decision to delay the planned fuel duty rise was vitally important as the impact on industry would have been significant at a time when the economy is facing turbulent times. With no expectations of a price drop in oil prices in the short term, we would anticipate that Alistair Darling has only delayed a difficult decision that should be scrapped.
"Small and medium sized firms were handed tax relief aimed at boosting SME investment which will be beneficial. Again, though, it comes in the wake of a tax hit when Mr Darling tinkered to disastrous effect with Capital Gains Tax.
"Unfortunately, what we are seeing is continued confusion for the business community at a time when greater stability is needed. What firms are gaining on the swings, they are losing or have already lost on the roundabouts."
Last Updated: 19 March 2008 1:21 PM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the 'Crossrail Bill' [a Bill in UK Parliament]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SGqe5VQwLHI/AAAAAAAABfc/MEjjMWby2dc/S226/Khoodeelaar!+try+this+logo.gif)
![London [Rupert Murdoched] Times, Wed. 7 May 2008](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitiFRN6uO_MOdYMby0s7ow2zcBaewOKfl3k4QdCPcahu1IKXx6sl7Gs4aO9VrAhN8gQJvYb1a2JnODsTUsMks_LtoZVuqc64whMkMitNKVz1bijPST853uNwRNG8x2PVFl1kqRez8M3b-j/s226/1676149.jpg)
