This page was last edited at 1840 Hrs GMT London Saturday 11 October 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! has long showed how corrupt and how totally in the pockets of Big Business the London Financial Times [=’FT’] is... Yet the BBC decides to wheel in and flaunt a succession of 'experts' on the 'crisis' , from the FT... This female face is the latest in a line up of ‘FT’-linked propagandists for the corrupt baks and the looters of the public via other vehicles...She was on display in the BBC News channel segment fronted by Tim Wilcox today Saturday 11 October 2008... She was as vacuous and empty and untruthful as her co-propagandists from the FT... Even when she referred to the role of the media in not seeing the crisis that ‘was coming’, [as if SHE had done the telling! She had NOT done it...] she was still suppressing the truth herself .... She appeared on the BBC news Channel... not long after Tim Wilcox played host to another of the strange ‘experts’ with an apparent link with an ‘emerging’ ‘partner’ [‘partner’ in what!!!!] ‘economy’! India!...... The India-linked ‘expert’ too was vacuous, empty and full of propaganda bytes that he had been watching as they are issued from the USA...In all the ‘news’; the BBC is piling up lies on mountains of lies The BBC is NOT telling the truth and nor is Robert Peston, ‘Business Editor; who has been accused by the Daily Mail of exerting too much power on the current phase of the Zombification programme..... But then the Daily mail is itself guilty of lying in its own way....Not least via its own over-hyped financial expert Alex Brummer..... the entire imperialist capitalist globalising robbery- and looting-enabling and looting-aiding media is servile to the looters, in collusion with the looting bankers and assorted conglomerates of crooks that have been looting the public across the continents ... and reducing the rest of the world to barrenness .... But the BBC will not tell the truth on any of THAT...[To be continued]
Saturday, October 11, 2008
Friday, October 10, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to crass, idiotic, unconstitutional, uneconomic role played by Tom Harris the just sacked Crossrail hole scam 'minister' [ 173]
This AADHIKARonline page was last edited at 2340 Hrs GMT London Friday 10 October 2008
As published a year ago on the web site of the HARROW Times
"
Muhammad Haque, London says...
10:55pm Thu 25 Oct 07
By©Muhammad Haque
2150 Hrs GMT
Thursday 25 October 2005
Khoodeelaar! The East End of London campaign against the CrossRail hole Bill notes the unconstitutional attitude as expressed by the transport minister Tom Harris in your report.
Mr Harris is showing undemocratic contempt for the principles and the practice of the sovereignty of parliament by expressing the presumption that he does not believe “that anyone wants the bill to be infinitely delayed or, worse still, cancelled”
Where, in any of the recorded contributions from any MP was there any suggestion of infinite delay?
Mr Harris is using stock phrases so typical of machine placemen in regimes that abhor democratic scrutiny of executive plots.
The particular Crossrail hole plot is linked with Big Business lobby of regional and UK central executive careerists and time-servers typified by the likes of the ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone.
Livingstone has hogged most of the limelight around Gordon Brown’s recent and unconvincing subscription to the mysterious merits of this scheme as the answer to the pressing transport needs of the people of London.
The various promotional utterances by the Gordon Brown entourage during the first week of October 2007 around the CrossRail hole plot were all staged as part of the now-thwarted snap election that Brown was almost ready to call.
That snap poll alone was Brown’s reason for staging the stunt about ‘CrossRail’. Fur the best part of the previous decade, as the UK Finance Minister, Gordon Brown and Ken Livingstone had not agreed on any of the substantive issues especially about matters to d with the public finance of private infrastructure projects.
How significant therefore that these very two adversaries suddenly found themselves behaving - for rather pretending en stages that had been specially set up in and metaphorically] around Bournemouth in September 2007- as if they had been inseparable twins for as long as memory served!
And just days before Brown was poised to call a snap election!
It is already emerging that Livingstone was 'perhaps' a tad too hasty to celebrate the ‘deal’ by claiming that he had ‘delivered’ CrossRail, thus showing up any tangible opponent to his ambition to remain the occupant of the ego-boosting office of ‘Undone mayor’ forever!
A democratic debate and scrutiny in any legitimate forum, far from being a tendency towards delaying an appropriate and sound plan, can ensure that any serious drawbacks that are found in or that remain in any plan that is supposed to be backed by several £Billions of public cash are dealt with thus sparing the public and the public purse avoidable wastes and losses in the future.
However, even if there were evidence to support the demand for a thorough review and examination of the transport needs in London in the context of the Uk economy including the central factor of the choice of the optimum mode of transport to meet the present and the mid term needs, such as Khoodeelaar! has been making for nearly 4 years of opposition to the current CrossRail hole plot, the likes of Tom Harris do not seem disposed to tolerate the emergence of such a rational answer to the transport problems.
Instead, they have gone for the fanatical short cut: they utter the mantra of Crossrail rather than talk about addressing the huge transport needs that the UK economy must see met and the capacity of the economy.
They have been behaving like a cult that has been recruited to the secret Crossrail plan which they insist must be supported by £Billions of public money but without parliamentary or democratic scrutiny!
Those who have been placed as the current UK Govt front men and women to tout for the CrossRail plot – as distinctly different from arguing for the democratically arrived at solution/s to the transport needs such as a mode that best suits the given regional and strategic needs, the demands and the sustainable capacity of the UK public purse have been discrediting their own claims to be respecters of the democratic process of decision-making by undermining even the most tokenistic of debates, the most pliant of scrutinies by exaggerating the adverse effects of upholding democracy!
During the Second Reading held in the House of Commons in July 2005, the then CrossRail hole plot Bill minister Alistair Darling led the insertion into the terms of reference for the ‘CrossRail Bill select committee of MPs’ of a BARRIER, a ban
Thus preventing that select committee from scrutiny the ‘Crossrail Bill’!
So the utterances by Tom Harris must be to do with the fact that even he knows that when the same Bill goes to the currently constituted Upper Chamber and is subjected to the corresponding select committee procedures, it may actually be scrutinised in an unpredictable way, so unpredictably that the truth about the fundamentally flawed nature of the plot may come out!
Is that what Tom Harris is aware of and is ‘career wise’ ‘worried’ about?
If it is, he is right to be worried!
Because no honest, informed and responsible scrutiny of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as it is, can support it in the context of the economy, the society, the environment and the finance."
As published a year ago on the web site of the HARROW Times
"
Muhammad Haque, London says...
10:55pm Thu 25 Oct 07
By©Muhammad Haque
2150 Hrs GMT
Thursday 25 October 2005
Khoodeelaar! The East End of London campaign against the CrossRail hole Bill notes the unconstitutional attitude as expressed by the transport minister Tom Harris in your report.
Mr Harris is showing undemocratic contempt for the principles and the practice of the sovereignty of parliament by expressing the presumption that he does not believe “that anyone wants the bill to be infinitely delayed or, worse still, cancelled”
Where, in any of the recorded contributions from any MP was there any suggestion of infinite delay?
Mr Harris is using stock phrases so typical of machine placemen in regimes that abhor democratic scrutiny of executive plots.
The particular Crossrail hole plot is linked with Big Business lobby of regional and UK central executive careerists and time-servers typified by the likes of the ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone.
Livingstone has hogged most of the limelight around Gordon Brown’s recent and unconvincing subscription to the mysterious merits of this scheme as the answer to the pressing transport needs of the people of London.
The various promotional utterances by the Gordon Brown entourage during the first week of October 2007 around the CrossRail hole plot were all staged as part of the now-thwarted snap election that Brown was almost ready to call.
That snap poll alone was Brown’s reason for staging the stunt about ‘CrossRail’. Fur the best part of the previous decade, as the UK Finance Minister, Gordon Brown and Ken Livingstone had not agreed on any of the substantive issues especially about matters to d with the public finance of private infrastructure projects.
How significant therefore that these very two adversaries suddenly found themselves behaving - for rather pretending en stages that had been specially set up in and metaphorically] around Bournemouth in September 2007- as if they had been inseparable twins for as long as memory served!
And just days before Brown was poised to call a snap election!
It is already emerging that Livingstone was 'perhaps' a tad too hasty to celebrate the ‘deal’ by claiming that he had ‘delivered’ CrossRail, thus showing up any tangible opponent to his ambition to remain the occupant of the ego-boosting office of ‘Undone mayor’ forever!
A democratic debate and scrutiny in any legitimate forum, far from being a tendency towards delaying an appropriate and sound plan, can ensure that any serious drawbacks that are found in or that remain in any plan that is supposed to be backed by several £Billions of public cash are dealt with thus sparing the public and the public purse avoidable wastes and losses in the future.
However, even if there were evidence to support the demand for a thorough review and examination of the transport needs in London in the context of the Uk economy including the central factor of the choice of the optimum mode of transport to meet the present and the mid term needs, such as Khoodeelaar! has been making for nearly 4 years of opposition to the current CrossRail hole plot, the likes of Tom Harris do not seem disposed to tolerate the emergence of such a rational answer to the transport problems.
Instead, they have gone for the fanatical short cut: they utter the mantra of Crossrail rather than talk about addressing the huge transport needs that the UK economy must see met and the capacity of the economy.
They have been behaving like a cult that has been recruited to the secret Crossrail plan which they insist must be supported by £Billions of public money but without parliamentary or democratic scrutiny!
Those who have been placed as the current UK Govt front men and women to tout for the CrossRail plot – as distinctly different from arguing for the democratically arrived at solution/s to the transport needs such as a mode that best suits the given regional and strategic needs, the demands and the sustainable capacity of the UK public purse have been discrediting their own claims to be respecters of the democratic process of decision-making by undermining even the most tokenistic of debates, the most pliant of scrutinies by exaggerating the adverse effects of upholding democracy!
During the Second Reading held in the House of Commons in July 2005, the then CrossRail hole plot Bill minister Alistair Darling led the insertion into the terms of reference for the ‘CrossRail Bill select committee of MPs’ of a BARRIER, a ban
Thus preventing that select committee from scrutiny the ‘Crossrail Bill’!
So the utterances by Tom Harris must be to do with the fact that even he knows that when the same Bill goes to the currently constituted Upper Chamber and is subjected to the corresponding select committee procedures, it may actually be scrutinised in an unpredictable way, so unpredictably that the truth about the fundamentally flawed nature of the plot may come out!
Is that what Tom Harris is aware of and is ‘career wise’ ‘worried’ about?
If it is, he is right to be worried!
Because no honest, informed and responsible scrutiny of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as it is, can support it in the context of the economy, the society, the environment and the finance."
East End community campaign against Crossrail hole scam denounces the 'legacy' of idiocy by Crossrail hole scam-backing MP! [171]
This page was last edited at 1200 Hrs GMT London Friday 10 October 2008
East End community campaign against Crossrail hole scam denounces the 'legacy' of idiocy by Crossrail hole scam-backing MP!
Campaigning members of the community in the East End of London last night told employees of the outfit linked with the ‘Crossrail’ scam that the House of Commons ‘Crossrail Bill’ ‘select committee’ [2006] had been a disgrace and that the roil played by the MP who blocked the presentation of evidence against Crossrail was a scandal and a crime against democracy.
The community boycotted a CRASSrail promoting manipulation event last night and instead held a campaigning meeting in the Greatorex Street. It was the 4th anniversary of the first demonstration [held on 22 October 2004] against the Crossrail hole role of the local Tower Hamlets Council .
The meeting decided to invite the ward councillors to a campaign question and answer session to be held on 27 October 2008. ALL wards that are affected by the Crossrail holes assaults in the E1 area have been invited to attend the meeting. The invitation has been sent this morning [Friday 10 October 2008] to Martin Smith and Isabella Freeman to pass on to the relevant councillors.
[To be continued]
East End community campaign against Crossrail hole scam denounces the 'legacy' of idiocy by Crossrail hole scam-backing MP!
Campaigning members of the community in the East End of London last night told employees of the outfit linked with the ‘Crossrail’ scam that the House of Commons ‘Crossrail Bill’ ‘select committee’ [2006] had been a disgrace and that the roil played by the MP who blocked the presentation of evidence against Crossrail was a scandal and a crime against democracy.
The community boycotted a CRASSrail promoting manipulation event last night and instead held a campaigning meeting in the Greatorex Street. It was the 4th anniversary of the first demonstration [held on 22 October 2004] against the Crossrail hole role of the local Tower Hamlets Council .
The meeting decided to invite the ward councillors to a campaign question and answer session to be held on 27 October 2008. ALL wards that are affected by the Crossrail holes assaults in the E1 area have been invited to attend the meeting. The invitation has been sent this morning [Friday 10 October 2008] to Martin Smith and Isabella Freeman to pass on to the relevant councillors.
[To be continued]
Friday, August 29, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to CRASSrail hole Big Business-prompted unconstitutionality by Alistair Darling:UPDATE
This page was last edited at 2328 Hrs GMT London Friday 29 August 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to CRASSrail hole Big Business-prompted unconstitutionality by Alistair Darling: UPDATE
By©Muhammad Haque
2215 Hrs GMTLondon Friday 29 August 2008
The BBC has reported in its 2100 GMT news bulletin on the NEWS Channel thatAlistair Darling has confessed to being surprised that people are 'pissedoff' with the Blaired party....'Part of the blame lies with the cabinetitself', says Karin Giannone, the presenter who took over at 2130 GMT fromthe previous one in the evening who had fronted the 2100 GMT news.... This 'candid' confession by Alistair Darling has been described by theBBC to be 'usual' and uncharacteristic and as a possible'fightback' by darling facing a likely demotion in a touted aboutreshuffle by Gordon Brown in his cabinet. Whatever the full truth, it is clear from Darling's dressed up'diatribe' issued by the pernicious, the poisonous Guardian, that theDarling cabinet man is involved in a tussle with one or more than one
of hiscolleagues inside the Brown-fronted Blaired 'team'. The intervention is likely to be 'chewed over' by all sorts of mediatalking heads over the weekend. As far as Khoodeelaar! is concerned. we can say without any speculation being necessary, that WE TOLD YOU SO!that Alistair darling is not to be trusted. Especial; when he makes bold claims for which there is no substance in fact. Like when he stated on 22 February 2005 that he was 'satisfied' thatthe 'Crossrail Bill' which he was on that date formally presenting inthe UK House of Commons [the so-called lower, the only elected chamber of theUK parliament] was 'compatible with the Convention'.
On the day after that utterance, KHOODEELAAR! Told Darling to withdraw thatfalse statement. And on almost a hundred separate occasions since 22 February2005, Khoodeelaar! has told Alistair Darling that the statement he made aboutthe Crossrail Bill being compatible with the Convention was
untrue and untenableand unjustified.
We have asked him to withdraw that statement and to scrap the Bill. Darling did not listen to us.For years. From February 2005 to February 2006 to February 2007 to February 2008. He took part in the parade of lies dressed up as 'harmless spin' forBig Business in the promotion of the lie that CRASSrail was a vital MAKER OFMONEY FOR THE UK ECONOMY... That Lie has now been caught out by Darling's own involvement in thedesperate, career-linked web of lies..... Darling will pay more dearly for lying for Big Business CRASSrail than he hasappeared to realise so far. And the Guardian's own poisonous promotion of CRASSrail hole plot is alsoexposed in this latest sneaky job that that pernicious 'newspaper'has done for the second time involving a Brown-cabinet-careerist. The lies will be referred to and cited by KHOODEELAAR! in the constitutional lawaction against the CRASSrail hole legislation... And instead of
listening to reason, to the truth and to the impeccably arguedcase which has been frequently vindicated by all events and by all objectivelyverifiable; criteria he has allowed two of his successors in the post as the UKcabinet minister for transport affairs,. to repeat that untruth about theCrossrail hole Bill being compatible with the European Convention for theProtection of Human rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! No to CRASSrail hole Big Business-prompted unconstitutionality by Alistair Darling: UPDATE
By©Muhammad Haque
2215 Hrs GMTLondon Friday 29 August 2008
The BBC has reported in its 2100 GMT news bulletin on the NEWS Channel thatAlistair Darling has confessed to being surprised that people are 'pissedoff' with the Blaired party....'Part of the blame lies with the cabinetitself', says Karin Giannone, the presenter who took over at 2130 GMT fromthe previous one in the evening who had fronted the 2100 GMT news.... This 'candid' confession by Alistair Darling has been described by theBBC to be 'usual' and uncharacteristic and as a possible'fightback' by darling facing a likely demotion in a touted aboutreshuffle by Gordon Brown in his cabinet. Whatever the full truth, it is clear from Darling's dressed up'diatribe' issued by the pernicious, the poisonous Guardian, that theDarling cabinet man is involved in a tussle with one or more than one
of hiscolleagues inside the Brown-fronted Blaired 'team'. The intervention is likely to be 'chewed over' by all sorts of mediatalking heads over the weekend. As far as Khoodeelaar! is concerned. we can say without any speculation being necessary, that WE TOLD YOU SO!that Alistair darling is not to be trusted. Especial; when he makes bold claims for which there is no substance in fact. Like when he stated on 22 February 2005 that he was 'satisfied' thatthe 'Crossrail Bill' which he was on that date formally presenting inthe UK House of Commons [the so-called lower, the only elected chamber of theUK parliament] was 'compatible with the Convention'.
On the day after that utterance, KHOODEELAAR! Told Darling to withdraw thatfalse statement. And on almost a hundred separate occasions since 22 February2005, Khoodeelaar! has told Alistair Darling that the statement he made aboutthe Crossrail Bill being compatible with the Convention was
untrue and untenableand unjustified.
We have asked him to withdraw that statement and to scrap the Bill. Darling did not listen to us.For years. From February 2005 to February 2006 to February 2007 to February 2008. He took part in the parade of lies dressed up as 'harmless spin' forBig Business in the promotion of the lie that CRASSrail was a vital MAKER OFMONEY FOR THE UK ECONOMY... That Lie has now been caught out by Darling's own involvement in thedesperate, career-linked web of lies..... Darling will pay more dearly for lying for Big Business CRASSrail than he hasappeared to realise so far. And the Guardian's own poisonous promotion of CRASSrail hole plot is alsoexposed in this latest sneaky job that that pernicious 'newspaper'has done for the second time involving a Brown-cabinet-careerist. The lies will be referred to and cited by KHOODEELAAR! in the constitutional lawaction against the CRASSrail hole legislation... And instead of
listening to reason, to the truth and to the impeccably arguedcase which has been frequently vindicated by all events and by all objectivelyverifiable; criteria he has allowed two of his successors in the post as the UKcabinet minister for transport affairs,. to repeat that untruth about theCrossrail hole Bill being compatible with the European Convention for theProtection of Human rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business agenda of looting public money: how London CRASSrail is DRIVEN by Big Business, NOT by PUBLIC demand!
KHOODEELAAR! comment on this [below] will follow in the next few hours:
"
Reduced workloads spread to civil engineering sector
Published: 26 August 2008 14:53 Author: Andrea Klettner More by this AuthorLast Updated: 27 August 2008 10:48Reader Responses
Ceca says water work is tapering off at the moment
Increase image
View all images
Civil engineering contractors are reporting a slide in workloads compared to earlier this year.
The sector had largely escaped the woes that have beset the housing market and the commercial and office sectors.
But the latest quarterly report by the Civil Engineering Contractors Association reveals that there are now more firms carrying out less work than in the previous quarter.
Ceca's quarterly workload trends survey – which measures the difference between the number of contractors reporting higher workloads compared to the number reporting reduced workloads – shows the overall balance for the country is now down to – 17 per cent, compared to a rise of 39 per cent in April.
Contractors surveyed said all roads, water and sewage works had decreased over May, June and July, as had work in the utilities and communications sectors.
Ceca director Rosemary Beales said big-ticket civils jobs needed to come on stream quickly.
She added: "Major projects such as Crossrail and nuclear need to move forward at a steady pace if the Government is to combat this loss of confidence."
Rail and airports showed positive balances, while harbours and water ways remained neutral.
In terms of regions, England has experienced the biggest decrease in work – going from 45 per cent in January to –22 per cent last month. Wales also reported a downturn, while Scotland is the only positive region – where confidence remains at 16 per cent.
But Ceca Scotland chief executive Alan Watt admitted contractors could still come under pressure due to decreasing workloads.
He added: "Although we are still pretty confident that the Scottish Government's major public sector infrastructure programme is secure we're becoming increasingly concerned that the housing market slump could get worse."
Mr Watt also called on the Scottish Government to confirm the details of the Scottish Futures Trust so that work can continue on schools, hospitals and infrastructure projects.
Author: Andrea Klettner. Reporter
"
"
Reduced workloads spread to civil engineering sector
Published: 26 August 2008 14:53 Author: Andrea Klettner More by this AuthorLast Updated: 27 August 2008 10:48Reader Responses
Ceca says water work is tapering off at the moment
Increase image
View all images
Civil engineering contractors are reporting a slide in workloads compared to earlier this year.
The sector had largely escaped the woes that have beset the housing market and the commercial and office sectors.
But the latest quarterly report by the Civil Engineering Contractors Association reveals that there are now more firms carrying out less work than in the previous quarter.
Ceca's quarterly workload trends survey – which measures the difference between the number of contractors reporting higher workloads compared to the number reporting reduced workloads – shows the overall balance for the country is now down to – 17 per cent, compared to a rise of 39 per cent in April.
Contractors surveyed said all roads, water and sewage works had decreased over May, June and July, as had work in the utilities and communications sectors.
Ceca director Rosemary Beales said big-ticket civils jobs needed to come on stream quickly.
She added: "Major projects such as Crossrail and nuclear need to move forward at a steady pace if the Government is to combat this loss of confidence."
Rail and airports showed positive balances, while harbours and water ways remained neutral.
In terms of regions, England has experienced the biggest decrease in work – going from 45 per cent in January to –22 per cent last month. Wales also reported a downturn, while Scotland is the only positive region – where confidence remains at 16 per cent.
But Ceca Scotland chief executive Alan Watt admitted contractors could still come under pressure due to decreasing workloads.
He added: "Although we are still pretty confident that the Scottish Government's major public sector infrastructure programme is secure we're becoming increasingly concerned that the housing market slump could get worse."
Mr Watt also called on the Scottish Government to confirm the details of the Scottish Futures Trust so that work can continue on schools, hospitals and infrastructure projects.
Author: Andrea Klettner. Reporter
"
Friday, August 8, 2008
CRASSness of Crossrail is AGAIN acknowledged by another admission of delay...
This page was last edited at 0945 GMT London friday 8 August 2008
0940 GMT London Friday 8 August 2008: KHOODEELAAR! The CRASSness of Crossrail is AGAIN acknowledged by another admission of delay.... In this admission, they also admit that 'everything with Crossrail takes six months longer'. But with no evidence of irony or concern. In a rational context, we would expect the interminable contradictions of Crassrail to be the cause for a very serious review of the whole scam. But with Crassrail, we are observing a cult event in progress. Fanatics are in charge and lunatics are making £Billions of public money available for Big Business looters who have bought the 'decision-making' bureaucrats' souls! [To be continued]
0940 GMT London Friday 8 August 2008: KHOODEELAAR! The CRASSness of Crossrail is AGAIN acknowledged by another admission of delay.... In this admission, they also admit that 'everything with Crossrail takes six months longer'. But with no evidence of irony or concern. In a rational context, we would expect the interminable contradictions of Crassrail to be the cause for a very serious review of the whole scam. But with Crassrail, we are observing a cult event in progress. Fanatics are in charge and lunatics are making £Billions of public money available for Big Business looters who have bought the 'decision-making' bureaucrats' souls! [To be continued]
The CRASSrail hole plot-backing ARCHANT-owned 'East London Idiotiser' is a corrupting agency....[2]
This page was last edited at 0920 GMT London Friday 8 August 2008
The evidence that we would include in the series of KHOODEELAAR! court actions to show the corrupt agenda operated via the Crossrail hole plot-backing 'East London Idiotiser'.. would include the contents of the 'news' reports carried in the 'newspaper'. Their web site has not existed for any really significant period. It has come into operation because of ARCHANT and only VERY recently. ..... Even so, their web site has become in effect another web of lies.... They lie by suppression . They lie by concealment. They lie by fabrication... And they have been backing the agenda of Crossrail hole plot......Not only that, they have been doing so brazenly racistly.. We investigate whether this is down to only one racist operating in the Idiotiser. Or whether it also includes Malcolm Starbrook as well..
[To be continued]
The evidence that we would include in the series of KHOODEELAAR! court actions to show the corrupt agenda operated via the Crossrail hole plot-backing 'East London Idiotiser'.. would include the contents of the 'news' reports carried in the 'newspaper'. Their web site has not existed for any really significant period. It has come into operation because of ARCHANT and only VERY recently. ..... Even so, their web site has become in effect another web of lies.... They lie by suppression . They lie by concealment. They lie by fabrication... And they have been backing the agenda of Crossrail hole plot......Not only that, they have been doing so brazenly racistly.. We investigate whether this is down to only one racist operating in the Idiotiser. Or whether it also includes Malcolm Starbrook as well..
[To be continued]
Thursday, August 7, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law action against "CROSSRAIL hole plot-couriers" programme update: [5] 7 August 2008
This page was last edited at 2010 GMT London Thursday 7 August 2008
KHOODEELAAR! evidence of representation TO CROSSRAIL company CLRL of the community opposition to the Crossrail hole plot - on behalf of the tenants, residents and occupiers of the premises and homes in the Whitechapel area streets concerned:
In the TEN months that have passed, no acknowledgement from Crossrail has been received. No reply has either been received. It is to be noted for the purpose of evidence that the -e-mail was sent to the GENERAL Crossrail e-mail address. Which means that ANY responsible employee would have had access to the inbox and they should have dealt with the e-mail. Except that Crossrail company DECIDED against acknowledging the communication.
By failing to BOTH acknowledge RECEIPT AND REPLY TO THE COMMUNICATION< the CLRL company again showed their defiance to the constitutional and legal duty to answer questions about the effects of the CRASSrail hole plan on the community.
This instance shows that the CLRL company behaved crassly. As it has been on the overwhelming number of occasions in the context.
THIS IS INCLUDED IN THE KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law acton evidence:
"TO Tom Mantey re 'Wodeham Gardens, Castlemain Street, Lomas St and Trahorn Close'- 1
Monday, September 17, 2007 1:56 PM
From:
"ConstitutionalandLegal Auditcommunication"
To:
helpdesk@crossrail.co.uk
Cc:
lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk, bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk
FAO Tom Mantey re 'Wodeham Gardens, Castlemain Street,
Lomas St and Trahorn Close'- 1
This is a communication being conducted on behalf of
KHOODEELAAR! and in relation to the above streets.
We are authorised by the residents - as confirmed at
the two public meetings held of residents and ca,campaigners
against Crossrail hole plan - to ask you the
relevant questions.
What legal authority do you have to propose to do what
your letter says you are going to do in the area?
Please send your response by return as this is very
urgent .
Yours faithfully
Law unit
Khoodeelaar!
1355 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 17 September 2007
KHOODEELAAR! evidence of representation TO CROSSRAIL company CLRL of the community opposition to the Crossrail hole plot - on behalf of the tenants, residents and occupiers of the premises and homes in the Whitechapel area streets concerned:
In the TEN months that have passed, no acknowledgement from Crossrail has been received. No reply has either been received. It is to be noted for the purpose of evidence that the -e-mail was sent to the GENERAL Crossrail e-mail address. Which means that ANY responsible employee would have had access to the inbox and they should have dealt with the e-mail. Except that Crossrail company DECIDED against acknowledging the communication.
By failing to BOTH acknowledge RECEIPT AND REPLY TO THE COMMUNICATION< the CLRL company again showed their defiance to the constitutional and legal duty to answer questions about the effects of the CRASSrail hole plan on the community.
This instance shows that the CLRL company behaved crassly. As it has been on the overwhelming number of occasions in the context.
THIS IS INCLUDED IN THE KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law acton evidence:
"TO Tom Mantey re 'Wodeham Gardens, Castlemain Street, Lomas St and Trahorn Close'- 1
Monday, September 17, 2007 1:56 PM
From:
"ConstitutionalandLegal Auditcommunication"
To:
helpdesk@crossrail.co.uk
Cc:
lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk, bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk
FAO Tom Mantey re 'Wodeham Gardens, Castlemain Street,
Lomas St and Trahorn Close'- 1
This is a communication being conducted on behalf of
KHOODEELAAR! and in relation to the above streets.
We are authorised by the residents - as confirmed at
the two public meetings held of residents and ca,campaigners
against Crossrail hole plan - to ask you the
relevant questions.
What legal authority do you have to propose to do what
your letter says you are going to do in the area?
Please send your response by return as this is very
urgent .
Yours faithfully
Law unit
Khoodeelaar!
1355 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 17 September 2007
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law action against "CROSSRAIL hole plot-couriers" programme update: [5] 7 August 2008
This page was last edited at 2005 Hrs GMT London Thursday 7 August 2008
KHOODEELAAR! evidence of representation TO CROSSRAIL company CLRL of the community opposition to the Crossrail hole plot - on behalf of the tenants, residents and occupiers of the premises and homes in the Whitechapel area streets concerned:
In the TEN months that have passed, no acknowledgement from Crossrail has been received. No reply has either been received. It is to be noted for the purpose of evidence that the -e-mail was sent to the GENERAL Crossrail e-mail address. Which means that ANY responsible employee would have had access to the inbox and they should have dealt with the e-mail. Except that Crossrail company DECIDED against acknowledging the communication.
By failing to BOTH acknowledge RECEIPT AND REPLY TO THE COMMUNICATION< the CLRL company again showed their defiance to the constitutional and legal duty to answer questions about the effects of the CRASSrail hole pan on the community.
This instance shows that the CLRL company behaved crassly. As it has been on the overwhelming number of occasions in the context.
THIS IS INCLUDED IN THE KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law acton evidence:
"TO Tom Mantey re 'Wodeham Gardens, Castlemain Street, Lomas St and Trahorn Close'- 1
Monday, September 17, 2007 1:56 PM
From:
"ConstitutionalandLegal Auditcommunication"
To:
helpdesk@crossrail.co.uk
Cc:
lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk, bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk
FAO Tom Mantey re 'Wodeham Gardens, Castlemain Street,
Lomas St and Trahorn Close'- 1
This is a communication being conducted on behalf of
KHOODEELAAR! and in relation to the above streets.
We are authorised by the residents - as confirmed at
the two public meetings held of residents and ca,campaigners
against Crossrail hole plan - to ask you the
relevant questions.
What legal authority do you have to propose to do what
your letter says you are going to do in the area?
Please send your response by return as this is very
urgent .
Yours faithfully
Law unit
Khoodeelaar!
1355 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 17 September 2007
KHOODEELAAR! evidence of representation TO CROSSRAIL company CLRL of the community opposition to the Crossrail hole plot - on behalf of the tenants, residents and occupiers of the premises and homes in the Whitechapel area streets concerned:
In the TEN months that have passed, no acknowledgement from Crossrail has been received. No reply has either been received. It is to be noted for the purpose of evidence that the -e-mail was sent to the GENERAL Crossrail e-mail address. Which means that ANY responsible employee would have had access to the inbox and they should have dealt with the e-mail. Except that Crossrail company DECIDED against acknowledging the communication.
By failing to BOTH acknowledge RECEIPT AND REPLY TO THE COMMUNICATION< the CLRL company again showed their defiance to the constitutional and legal duty to answer questions about the effects of the CRASSrail hole pan on the community.
This instance shows that the CLRL company behaved crassly. As it has been on the overwhelming number of occasions in the context.
THIS IS INCLUDED IN THE KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law acton evidence:
"TO Tom Mantey re 'Wodeham Gardens, Castlemain Street, Lomas St and Trahorn Close'- 1
Monday, September 17, 2007 1:56 PM
From:
"ConstitutionalandLegal Auditcommunication"
To:
helpdesk@crossrail.co.uk
Cc:
lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk, bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk
FAO Tom Mantey re 'Wodeham Gardens, Castlemain Street,
Lomas St and Trahorn Close'- 1
This is a communication being conducted on behalf of
KHOODEELAAR! and in relation to the above streets.
We are authorised by the residents - as confirmed at
the two public meetings held of residents and ca,campaigners
against Crossrail hole plan - to ask you the
relevant questions.
What legal authority do you have to propose to do what
your letter says you are going to do in the area?
Please send your response by return as this is very
urgent .
Yours faithfully
Law unit
Khoodeelaar!
1355 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 17 September 2007
Sunday, July 27, 2008
Crossrail hole plot-promoting, clueless Harriet Harman is not doing Brown any favours by her banal, scripted utterances...
By©Muhammad Haque
1605 Hrs GMT
London Sunday 27 July 2008
It was Harriet Harman, none other than the Heartless one herself, who boasted less than a fortnight ago that the 'House', the Commons that is, would not 'rise' [that is, would not sit down=would not go on the two month long holiday!] until the speaker had confirmed that 'Royal Assent' had been given to the 'Crossrail Bill'!
And why was Harriet wrong to make that statement?
Answer: Because she was behaving there like an insensitive, irresponsive, uncaring, unheeding, unaccountable, irresponsible member of a legislature.... and that she was taking part in the breaking of the constitution........ because she knew that the Crossrail Bill was being allowed through without complying with the due procedures and the processes of constitutionality that the Crossrail Bill was a pack of lies... that it was a product of and linked closely with undemocratic, unaccountable and identified by name forces of greed that in fact plotted to pocket £billions of public money under the cover of Crossrail.....that her pretentious pronouncements in paraded protestations all day throughout the day today Sunday 27 July 2008 are untrue. Untruthful. And unfounded on fact. She voted for the Crossrail Bill all the way. She never even paused to ask if the people in the East End of London or indeed in the centre of the Mayfair area in west London had had our objections heard by Parliament. Harriet Harman is a known failure as a minister. She lost the job as Blair’s first cabinet minister in control of the Social Security Department [=DSS] [=now = DWP] . She did not get to grips with the subject. She in fact allowed the starving of hundreds of thousands of people..... She knew that she was responsible for the people being forced into starvation for no reason.... Was that economic? What economics does Harriet Harman understand? What evidence has she ever shown of the legality, the ECONOMIC justification for casting hundreds of thousands of people into poverty in Britain? That was in 1997-1998... Ten years on , she has the gall to utter today, ten years on from her terrible role at the DSS in 1997-1998 about ‘an economic problem’! Does she mean ONE economic problem? Or does she mean a problem that is economic? With harriet harman, there is no telling whether she is speaking with knowledge or whether she is appearing with a scripted utterance just to put a gloss on a devastating state of affairs...... Is that state anything to do with lack of respect fro people? With Harriet, definitely not. Harriet Harman’s achievement is that as a token, she has achieved herself a corner in the book of records. But she has done so at the expense of the rights of hundreds of thousands of families. She has sacrificed the human rights and violated the dignity of millions of individuals. at And shed has neglected the needs of similar numbers of children... Today, Sunday 27 July 2008, Harriet Harman has been speaking about her awareness of peoples’ struggle;e in making ends meet! She is in fact being sued by Gordon Brown as his voice today...How dare Harriet Harman talk about peoples’ hardship and refer to peoples’ struggles with making ends meet? She is the problem. She is the symbolic problem and she is also the constitutional problem... shall expose Harriet Harman’s hollowness in detail in this series of comments... One key problem that has forced so many people into the struggling position is the lack of honour in the actions and the utterances of the Govt to which Harriet belongs and off which Harriet takes the obvious 'satisfaction'....Personally, she is doing well in her career But she is doing so by sinking so many peoples’ hopes and rights..... She is the one that has been now plugging for the Big Business agenda Govt...She is the one that said that the House will ‘not rise’ until the Crossrail hoe plot was given the status of law on the last day of the current session....She showed contempt when she toured Tower Hamlets DURING THE RUN up to the 1 May 2008 ‘by-elections’ and the GLA , ‘mayor, ‘in the name of London’ elections, making photo appearances in the East Lon don Borough with suitably stooged ‘Blaired machine zombie faces and assorted tokens’ programmed to promote the agenda that she has been backing... That agenda is one of backing Big Business and of riding roughshod over communities like the people affected by the Crossrail hole plot in the area.... She has shown nothing but contempt for the people who have stated so many serious objections and have pointed out so many errors, mistakes and wrongs in the Crossrail package.... She has chosen, instead, to be pals with Oona King, who had insulted people in the community and from the East End of London in 2004-2005 when they tried to talk some sense into Oona King [still ‘MP’ in the name of the people in the parliamentary constituency of Bethnal Green and Bow] and who tried to get her [‘Oona King’ ] to speak against Crossrail hole plot... Oona King did not speak against the Crossrail hole plot. Politically, democratically and electorally she was given due and clear and unmistakable warning that her refusals to show respect to the people of the East End and her refusal and failure to represent the community’s opposition to the Crossrail hole scam, Crossrail hole plot would not be forgotten. People remembered Oona King’s behaviour when the time came in may 2005... By her failures to tell the truth against Crossrail, by her refusal to tell the truth about the campaign in the community against the Crossrail, hole Big Business agenda, Oona King showed that she was not suited to being an MP. Not especially to being an MP that showed respect to the constituency. Especially not in a constituency like the Bethnal Green and Bow .... To this day, Oona King has not stated any opposition to Crossrail hole agenda She has made money by referring to the campaign. That alleged confirmation by Tony McNulty, Crossrail hole plot minister at the time, that Oona king had been STUPID by letting him walk into a meeting where anti-Crossrail hole plot people were present, is still full of questions... It RAISES questions. Much more than it answers.... Why? Because Oona King herself AGREED with the things that McNulty was up to at that time in his de facto role as the plugger of the Big Business scam that was later to become known as the “Crossrail Bill’.... So if Oona King had herself DISAGREED with McNulty on Crossrail and if she had disagreed with Crossrail scam itself then she would have stated that opposition somewhere after referring to McNulty calling her STUPID...........Without acknowledging the campaign against Crossrail hole plot in any honest ethical dignified or democratic way, Oona King has maintained her own alienation from the truth. And from the reality of the community........
1605 Hrs GMT
London Sunday 27 July 2008
It was Harriet Harman, none other than the Heartless one herself, who boasted less than a fortnight ago that the 'House', the Commons that is, would not 'rise' [that is, would not sit down=would not go on the two month long holiday!] until the speaker had confirmed that 'Royal Assent' had been given to the 'Crossrail Bill'!
And why was Harriet wrong to make that statement?
Answer: Because she was behaving there like an insensitive, irresponsive, uncaring, unheeding, unaccountable, irresponsible member of a legislature.... and that she was taking part in the breaking of the constitution........ because she knew that the Crossrail Bill was being allowed through without complying with the due procedures and the processes of constitutionality that the Crossrail Bill was a pack of lies... that it was a product of and linked closely with undemocratic, unaccountable and identified by name forces of greed that in fact plotted to pocket £billions of public money under the cover of Crossrail.....that her pretentious pronouncements in paraded protestations all day throughout the day today Sunday 27 July 2008 are untrue. Untruthful. And unfounded on fact. She voted for the Crossrail Bill all the way. She never even paused to ask if the people in the East End of London or indeed in the centre of the Mayfair area in west London had had our objections heard by Parliament. Harriet Harman is a known failure as a minister. She lost the job as Blair’s first cabinet minister in control of the Social Security Department [=DSS] [=now = DWP] . She did not get to grips with the subject. She in fact allowed the starving of hundreds of thousands of people..... She knew that she was responsible for the people being forced into starvation for no reason.... Was that economic? What economics does Harriet Harman understand? What evidence has she ever shown of the legality, the ECONOMIC justification for casting hundreds of thousands of people into poverty in Britain? That was in 1997-1998... Ten years on , she has the gall to utter today, ten years on from her terrible role at the DSS in 1997-1998 about ‘an economic problem’! Does she mean ONE economic problem? Or does she mean a problem that is economic? With harriet harman, there is no telling whether she is speaking with knowledge or whether she is appearing with a scripted utterance just to put a gloss on a devastating state of affairs...... Is that state anything to do with lack of respect fro people? With Harriet, definitely not. Harriet Harman’s achievement is that as a token, she has achieved herself a corner in the book of records. But she has done so at the expense of the rights of hundreds of thousands of families. She has sacrificed the human rights and violated the dignity of millions of individuals. at And shed has neglected the needs of similar numbers of children... Today, Sunday 27 July 2008, Harriet Harman has been speaking about her awareness of peoples’ struggle;e in making ends meet! She is in fact being sued by Gordon Brown as his voice today...How dare Harriet Harman talk about peoples’ hardship and refer to peoples’ struggles with making ends meet? She is the problem. She is the symbolic problem and she is also the constitutional problem... shall expose Harriet Harman’s hollowness in detail in this series of comments... One key problem that has forced so many people into the struggling position is the lack of honour in the actions and the utterances of the Govt to which Harriet belongs and off which Harriet takes the obvious 'satisfaction'....Personally, she is doing well in her career But she is doing so by sinking so many peoples’ hopes and rights..... She is the one that has been now plugging for the Big Business agenda Govt...She is the one that said that the House will ‘not rise’ until the Crossrail hoe plot was given the status of law on the last day of the current session....She showed contempt when she toured Tower Hamlets DURING THE RUN up to the 1 May 2008 ‘by-elections’ and the GLA , ‘mayor, ‘in the name of London’ elections, making photo appearances in the East Lon don Borough with suitably stooged ‘Blaired machine zombie faces and assorted tokens’ programmed to promote the agenda that she has been backing... That agenda is one of backing Big Business and of riding roughshod over communities like the people affected by the Crossrail hole plot in the area.... She has shown nothing but contempt for the people who have stated so many serious objections and have pointed out so many errors, mistakes and wrongs in the Crossrail package.... She has chosen, instead, to be pals with Oona King, who had insulted people in the community and from the East End of London in 2004-2005 when they tried to talk some sense into Oona King [still ‘MP’ in the name of the people in the parliamentary constituency of Bethnal Green and Bow] and who tried to get her [‘Oona King’ ] to speak against Crossrail hole plot... Oona King did not speak against the Crossrail hole plot. Politically, democratically and electorally she was given due and clear and unmistakable warning that her refusals to show respect to the people of the East End and her refusal and failure to represent the community’s opposition to the Crossrail hole scam, Crossrail hole plot would not be forgotten. People remembered Oona King’s behaviour when the time came in may 2005... By her failures to tell the truth against Crossrail, by her refusal to tell the truth about the campaign in the community against the Crossrail, hole Big Business agenda, Oona King showed that she was not suited to being an MP. Not especially to being an MP that showed respect to the constituency. Especially not in a constituency like the Bethnal Green and Bow .... To this day, Oona King has not stated any opposition to Crossrail hole agenda She has made money by referring to the campaign. That alleged confirmation by Tony McNulty, Crossrail hole plot minister at the time, that Oona king had been STUPID by letting him walk into a meeting where anti-Crossrail hole plot people were present, is still full of questions... It RAISES questions. Much more than it answers.... Why? Because Oona King herself AGREED with the things that McNulty was up to at that time in his de facto role as the plugger of the Big Business scam that was later to become known as the “Crossrail Bill’.... So if Oona King had herself DISAGREED with McNulty on Crossrail and if she had disagreed with Crossrail scam itself then she would have stated that opposition somewhere after referring to McNulty calling her STUPID...........Without acknowledging the campaign against Crossrail hole plot in any honest ethical dignified or democratic way, Oona King has maintained her own alienation from the truth. And from the reality of the community........
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! legal questions to Boris Johnson ALSO expose the sham Crossrail legislation process at Westminster just ‘stooged through the motion’!
KHOODEELAAR! LAW UNIT to Boris Johnson by E-MAIL at 1230 Hrs UK 22 July 2008
These [in two parts] [This is part 2 of 2] are the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole questions that Boris Johnson must answer today about Crossrail
What is the evidence for saying that Crossrail is crucial to the London economy?
What is the evidence for saying that Crossrail will bring benefits to the East End of Lon don?
What does ‘benefits’ in this context refer to in ordinary language? Does it relate to human, economic social, societal productive capacities that are not obtainable or available in any other way in London’s East End or via or from or through the existing transport facilities, links and infrastructure except by there being a rail line called [or like the one devised as] Crossrail?
If so what is that evidence?
Where is that evidence?
And if that evidence exists, how long has that existed?
And who created the analytical identify of that evidence?
Who did any research, investigation and where and over what time and in what field and with what materials and subjects and under what criteria and parameters and commission and authority?
What is any evidence that says that Crossrail is vital for London’s world class status? What exactly foes that phrase refer to and on what basis in terms of the day to day experience in London today and in the recent past?
What legal, evidential, constitutional and democratic reason is there, if any, for there being no answer to the hundreds of KHOODEELAAR! questions concerning and covering all the main aspects of the whole CROSSRAIL scam and as put in the past years to the office you now hold?
Ends part 2 of the updated Question to Boris Johnson
1200 GMT
1300 UKTime
London
Tuesday 22 July 2008
2nd part follows in a few minutes
These [in two parts] [This is part 2 of 2] are the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole questions that Boris Johnson must answer today about Crossrail
What is the evidence for saying that Crossrail is crucial to the London economy?
What is the evidence for saying that Crossrail will bring benefits to the East End of Lon don?
What does ‘benefits’ in this context refer to in ordinary language? Does it relate to human, economic social, societal productive capacities that are not obtainable or available in any other way in London’s East End or via or from or through the existing transport facilities, links and infrastructure except by there being a rail line called [or like the one devised as] Crossrail?
If so what is that evidence?
Where is that evidence?
And if that evidence exists, how long has that existed?
And who created the analytical identify of that evidence?
Who did any research, investigation and where and over what time and in what field and with what materials and subjects and under what criteria and parameters and commission and authority?
What is any evidence that says that Crossrail is vital for London’s world class status? What exactly foes that phrase refer to and on what basis in terms of the day to day experience in London today and in the recent past?
What legal, evidential, constitutional and democratic reason is there, if any, for there being no answer to the hundreds of KHOODEELAAR! questions concerning and covering all the main aspects of the whole CROSSRAIL scam and as put in the past years to the office you now hold?
Ends part 2 of the updated Question to Boris Johnson
1200 GMT
1300 UKTime
London
Tuesday 22 July 2008
2nd part follows in a few minutes
KHOODEELAAR! demands Boris Johnson must fully face up to on Crossrail hole plot waste
KHOODEELAAR! LAW UNIT to Boris Johnson by E-MAIL at 1230 Hrs UK 22 July 2008
These [in two parts] are the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole questions that Boris Johnson must answer today about Crossrail
1. What admissible and accessible and publicly available as at today Tuesday 22 July 2008 evidence is there that shows that the transport needs of London are primarily about there being a Crossrail?
2. What reasonable ground is there for Gordon Brown's ignoring the advice of Rod Eddington [see Channel 4 news, October 2007] and making that transparently election-linked stunt announcement of the commitment of £Billions of public money to Crossrail?
3. What correlative evidence is there for the promotion of the Crossrail scam as ‘bringing benefits’ to ANY ordinary part of London communities as OPPOSED to Crossrail being used as a propaganda, and a marketing hype and reference tool to enhance the unsubstantiated i image of what the promoters consider to be Britain?
4. What is the evidence in any reasonable sense that shows that the lies which Ken Livingstone admitted as having perpetrated to get the 2012 Olympic Games hosting to London on the BBC TV Question Time programme [in which Boris Johnson himself took part in the last week of April 2008] were acceptable?
5. What ground is there for any lies to be accepted ?
6. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the low income groups of people in London have the demand, expressed the demand or have agreed to the demand by their economic conduct or the capacity to support the extra costs of funding Crossrail?
7. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the ordinary people who use or need to use transport in London have given any preference to the public money and the council tax payers'’ money being wasted in the way that Crossrail entails?
8. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of Lon d’ conducted that shows the full range in accessible way of the existing transport infrastructure in London as compared to the full implications and ramifications of the Crossrail hole scam?
Ends part 1 of the updated Question to Boris Johnson
1130 GMT
1230 UKTime
London
Tuesday 22 July 2008
2nd part follows in a few minutes
These [in two parts] are the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole questions that Boris Johnson must answer today about Crossrail
1. What admissible and accessible and publicly available as at today Tuesday 22 July 2008 evidence is there that shows that the transport needs of London are primarily about there being a Crossrail?
2. What reasonable ground is there for Gordon Brown's ignoring the advice of Rod Eddington [see Channel 4 news, October 2007] and making that transparently election-linked stunt announcement of the commitment of £Billions of public money to Crossrail?
3. What correlative evidence is there for the promotion of the Crossrail scam as ‘bringing benefits’ to ANY ordinary part of London communities as OPPOSED to Crossrail being used as a propaganda, and a marketing hype and reference tool to enhance the unsubstantiated i image of what the promoters consider to be Britain?
4. What is the evidence in any reasonable sense that shows that the lies which Ken Livingstone admitted as having perpetrated to get the 2012 Olympic Games hosting to London on the BBC TV Question Time programme [in which Boris Johnson himself took part in the last week of April 2008] were acceptable?
5. What ground is there for any lies to be accepted ?
6. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the low income groups of people in London have the demand, expressed the demand or have agreed to the demand by their economic conduct or the capacity to support the extra costs of funding Crossrail?
7. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the ordinary people who use or need to use transport in London have given any preference to the public money and the council tax payers'’ money being wasted in the way that Crossrail entails?
8. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of Lon d’ conducted that shows the full range in accessible way of the existing transport infrastructure in London as compared to the full implications and ramifications of the Crossrail hole scam?
Ends part 1 of the updated Question to Boris Johnson
1130 GMT
1230 UKTime
London
Tuesday 22 July 2008
2nd part follows in a few minutes
KHOODEELAAR! demands Boris Johnson must fully face up to on Crossrail hole plot waste
KHOODEELAAR! LAW UNIT to Boris Johnson by E-MAIL at 1230 Hrs UK 22 July 2008
These [in two parts] are the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole questions that Boris Johnson must answer today about Crossrail
1. What admissible and accessible and publicly available as at today Tuesday 22 July 2008 evidence is there that shows that the transport needs of London are primarily about there being a Crossrail?
2. What reasonable ground is there for Gordon Brown's ignoring the advice of Rod Eddington [see Channel 4 news, October 2007] and making that transparently election-linked stunt announcement of the commitment of £Billions of public money to Crossrail?
3. What correlative evidence is there for the promotion of the Crossrail scam as ‘bringing benefits’ to ANY ordinary part of London communities as OPPOSED to Crossrail being used as a propaganda, and a marketing hype and reference tool to enhance the unsubstantiated i image of what the promoters consider to be Britain?
4. What is the evidence in any reasonable sense that shows that the lies which Ken Livingstone admitted as having perpetrated to get the 2012 Olympic Games hosting to London on the BBC TV Question Time programme [in which Boris Johnson himself took part in the last week of April 2008] were acceptable?
5. What ground is there for any lies to be accepted ?
6. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the low income groups of people in London have the demand, expressed the demand or have agreed to the demand by their economic conduct or the capacity to support the extra costs of funding Crossrail?
7. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the ordinary people who use or need to use transport in London have given any preference to the public money and the council tax payers'’ money being wasted in the way that Crossrail entails?
8. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of Lon d’ conducted that shows the full range in accessible way of the existing transport infrastructure in London as compared to the full implications and ramifications of the Crossrail hole scam?
Ends part 1 of the updated Question to Boris Johnson
1130 GMT
1230 UKTime
London
Tuesday 22 July 2008
2nd part follows in a few minutes
These [in two parts] are the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole questions that Boris Johnson must answer today about Crossrail
1. What admissible and accessible and publicly available as at today Tuesday 22 July 2008 evidence is there that shows that the transport needs of London are primarily about there being a Crossrail?
2. What reasonable ground is there for Gordon Brown's ignoring the advice of Rod Eddington [see Channel 4 news, October 2007] and making that transparently election-linked stunt announcement of the commitment of £Billions of public money to Crossrail?
3. What correlative evidence is there for the promotion of the Crossrail scam as ‘bringing benefits’ to ANY ordinary part of London communities as OPPOSED to Crossrail being used as a propaganda, and a marketing hype and reference tool to enhance the unsubstantiated i image of what the promoters consider to be Britain?
4. What is the evidence in any reasonable sense that shows that the lies which Ken Livingstone admitted as having perpetrated to get the 2012 Olympic Games hosting to London on the BBC TV Question Time programme [in which Boris Johnson himself took part in the last week of April 2008] were acceptable?
5. What ground is there for any lies to be accepted ?
6. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the low income groups of people in London have the demand, expressed the demand or have agreed to the demand by their economic conduct or the capacity to support the extra costs of funding Crossrail?
7. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the ordinary people who use or need to use transport in London have given any preference to the public money and the council tax payers'’ money being wasted in the way that Crossrail entails?
8. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of Lon d’ conducted that shows the full range in accessible way of the existing transport infrastructure in London as compared to the full implications and ramifications of the Crossrail hole scam?
Ends part 1 of the updated Question to Boris Johnson
1130 GMT
1230 UKTime
London
Tuesday 22 July 2008
2nd part follows in a few minutes
Khoodeelaar! final notice before court proceedings, sent to Boris Johnson: DON"T Endorse Crossrail scam!
Dear Mr Johnson
This is further to our previous memos, questions, notices as served on the holder of the post of mayor of London on the matter of the 'Crossrail hole scam' as contained in and represented by the 'Crossrail Bill' which Harriet Harman has said would be conveyed as having been given the Royal assent today.
We are sending this to confirm that as soon as the existing UK domestic court procedures permit, we shall be filing applications to the High court against ALL those who have been in power to promote the Crossrail Bill and the scam. That includes the holder of the office of mayor in the name of London.
That means yourself.
We are therefore asking you to delay any repeat by ‘the mayor’ in the name of London of any fanatical, enthusiastic [including and implying exaggerated, unsubstantiated...] endorsement OF THE CROSSRAIL BILL [or ‘Crossrail Act’] UNTIL AFTER YOU HAVE READ AND RESPONDED TO OUR LATEST LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW QUESTIONS. Those questions are being prepared now and will be sent to you by 1400 Hrs UK time today.
Should you decide to ignore this and go ahead anyway in making the endorsing comment etc. we shall treat such action as being conclusive confirmation of your position. That position will warrant our treating you as the SECOND defendant in any court action.
We are asking you to DELAY ANY agreement with the DfT or any other party peddling the Crassrail scam until you have fully considered our objections and responded to us in full on our evidence and have fully responded to us within the law and within the constitution. By ‘the constitution’ we mean and also include the UK’s treaty obligations and draw your attention, as a brief pointer in this short updater communication, to the Factortame cases and THEIR relevance to the UK’s law-making conduct and the implications thereof. Other cases and precedents shall be cited in due course. BOTH the EU and the ECHR shall be invoked. Domestically [in domestic UK judicial contexts] , we shall be invoking all the anti-discriminatory legislation as well.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely
KHOODEELAAR! LAW Unit
Postal service address:
1120 Hrs UK
1020 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 22 July 2008
This is further to our previous memos, questions, notices as served on the holder of the post of mayor of London on the matter of the 'Crossrail hole scam' as contained in and represented by the 'Crossrail Bill' which Harriet Harman has said would be conveyed as having been given the Royal assent today.
We are sending this to confirm that as soon as the existing UK domestic court procedures permit, we shall be filing applications to the High court against ALL those who have been in power to promote the Crossrail Bill and the scam. That includes the holder of the office of mayor in the name of London.
That means yourself.
We are therefore asking you to delay any repeat by ‘the mayor’ in the name of London of any fanatical, enthusiastic [including and implying exaggerated, unsubstantiated...] endorsement OF THE CROSSRAIL BILL [or ‘Crossrail Act’] UNTIL AFTER YOU HAVE READ AND RESPONDED TO OUR LATEST LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW QUESTIONS. Those questions are being prepared now and will be sent to you by 1400 Hrs UK time today.
Should you decide to ignore this and go ahead anyway in making the endorsing comment etc. we shall treat such action as being conclusive confirmation of your position. That position will warrant our treating you as the SECOND defendant in any court action.
We are asking you to DELAY ANY agreement with the DfT or any other party peddling the Crassrail scam until you have fully considered our objections and responded to us in full on our evidence and have fully responded to us within the law and within the constitution. By ‘the constitution’ we mean and also include the UK’s treaty obligations and draw your attention, as a brief pointer in this short updater communication, to the Factortame cases and THEIR relevance to the UK’s law-making conduct and the implications thereof. Other cases and precedents shall be cited in due course. BOTH the EU and the ECHR shall be invoked. Domestically [in domestic UK judicial contexts] , we shall be invoking all the anti-discriminatory legislation as well.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely
KHOODEELAAR! LAW Unit
Postal service address:
1120 Hrs UK
1020 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 22 July 2008
Khoodeelaar! final notice before court proceedings, sent to Boris Johnson: DON"T Endorse Crossrail scam!
Dear Mr Johnson
This is further to our previous memos, questions, notices as served on the holder of the post of mayor of London on the matter of the 'Crossrail hole scam' as contained in and represented by the 'Crossrail Bill' which Harriet Harman has said would be conveyed as having been given the Royal assent today.
We are sending this to confirm that as soon as the existing UK domestic court procedures permit, we shall be filing applications to the High court against ALL those who have been in power to promote the Crossrail Bill and the scam. That includes the holder of the office of mayor in the name of London.
That means yourself.
We are therefore asking you to delay any repeat by ‘the mayor’ in the name of London of any fanatical, enthusiastic [including and implying exaggerated, unsubstantiated...] endorsement OF THE CROSSRAIL BILL [or ‘Crossrail Act’] UNTIL AFTER YOU HAVE READ AND RESPONDED TO OUR LATEST LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW QUESTIONS. Those questions are being prepared now and will be sent to you by 1400 Hrs UK time today.
Should you decide to ignore this and go ahead anyway in making the endorsing comment etc. we shall treat such action as being conclusive confirmation of your position. That position will warrant our treating you as the SECOND defendant in any court action.
We are asking you to DELAY ANY agreement with the DfT or any other party peddling the Crassrail scam until you have fully considered our objections and responded to us in full on our evidence and have fully responded to us within the law and within the constitution. By ‘the constitution’ we mean and also include the UK’s treaty obligations and draw your attention, as a brief pointer in this short updater communication, to the Factortame cases and THEIR relevance to the UK’s law-making conduct and the implications thereof. Other cases and precedents shall be cited in due course. BOTH the EU and the ECHR shall be invoked. Domestically [in domestic UK judicial contexts] , we shall be invoking all the anti-discriminatory legislation as well.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely
KHOODEELAAR! LAW Unit
Postal service address:
1120 Hrs UK
1020 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 22 July 2008
This is further to our previous memos, questions, notices as served on the holder of the post of mayor of London on the matter of the 'Crossrail hole scam' as contained in and represented by the 'Crossrail Bill' which Harriet Harman has said would be conveyed as having been given the Royal assent today.
We are sending this to confirm that as soon as the existing UK domestic court procedures permit, we shall be filing applications to the High court against ALL those who have been in power to promote the Crossrail Bill and the scam. That includes the holder of the office of mayor in the name of London.
That means yourself.
We are therefore asking you to delay any repeat by ‘the mayor’ in the name of London of any fanatical, enthusiastic [including and implying exaggerated, unsubstantiated...] endorsement OF THE CROSSRAIL BILL [or ‘Crossrail Act’] UNTIL AFTER YOU HAVE READ AND RESPONDED TO OUR LATEST LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW QUESTIONS. Those questions are being prepared now and will be sent to you by 1400 Hrs UK time today.
Should you decide to ignore this and go ahead anyway in making the endorsing comment etc. we shall treat such action as being conclusive confirmation of your position. That position will warrant our treating you as the SECOND defendant in any court action.
We are asking you to DELAY ANY agreement with the DfT or any other party peddling the Crassrail scam until you have fully considered our objections and responded to us in full on our evidence and have fully responded to us within the law and within the constitution. By ‘the constitution’ we mean and also include the UK’s treaty obligations and draw your attention, as a brief pointer in this short updater communication, to the Factortame cases and THEIR relevance to the UK’s law-making conduct and the implications thereof. Other cases and precedents shall be cited in due course. BOTH the EU and the ECHR shall be invoked. Domestically [in domestic UK judicial contexts] , we shall be invoking all the anti-discriminatory legislation as well.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely
KHOODEELAAR! LAW Unit
Postal service address:
1120 Hrs UK
1020 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 22 July 2008
Sunday, July 20, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law claims against Alistair Darling over poverty-creating London Crossrail hole scam
This page of AADHIKARonline was last edited at 0815 GMT Sunday 20 july 2008
Constitutional law commentary and update by©Muhammad Haque
0815 Hrs GMT
LOndon Sunday 20 July 2008
COMING HERE in the next hours, including the following:-
1. How Tower Hamlets Council CROSSRAIL hole plot and agenda -inviting clique makes the East End borough poor and keeps poverty going AS POLICY as well as CULTURE
2. The full list of claims against Alistair Darling [who will be co-defendant with amongst other Ruth kelly and Douglas Alexander] as the claims are being filed in court after next Tuesday's Crossrail hole plot 'Royal Assent'
3. The list of allegations against the London Assembly and the Tfl [Transport for London] and DFT ][Department for Transport] on Crossrail hole plot
4. The list of allegations against the bureaucracies involved in the Crossrail Bill select committees in the UK House of Commons and the UK "legislative' House of Lords
5. Other legal, evidential items
[To be continued]
Constitutional law commentary and update by©Muhammad Haque
0815 Hrs GMT
LOndon Sunday 20 July 2008
COMING HERE in the next hours, including the following:-
1. How Tower Hamlets Council CROSSRAIL hole plot and agenda -inviting clique makes the East End borough poor and keeps poverty going AS POLICY as well as CULTURE
2. The full list of claims against Alistair Darling [who will be co-defendant with amongst other Ruth kelly and Douglas Alexander] as the claims are being filed in court after next Tuesday's Crossrail hole plot 'Royal Assent'
3. The list of allegations against the London Assembly and the Tfl [Transport for London] and DFT ][Department for Transport] on Crossrail hole plot
4. The list of allegations against the bureaucracies involved in the Crossrail Bill select committees in the UK House of Commons and the UK "legislative' House of Lords
5. Other legal, evidential items
[To be continued]
Saturday, July 19, 2008
As the degenerating, poverty-creating, Big Business Crossrail hole agenda gets MPs rubber stamp on Tuesday, how the media have lied, hidden the truth
By©Muhammad Haque 0435 Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 July 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘Corral hole Big Business agenda’ CAMPAIGN has pointed out for years that the so-called ‘prudent financial journal’ the FT was a platform of corrupt journalism, often misleading the ‘readers’ on the actual economic conditions, trends and the correlated facts, events and plots In the context of the Big Business Crassrail hole plot, the FT has published lies.
Just like the London EVENING Nostandards STANDARD, the FT has published fabricated accounts on the cots, the need and the relevance of the Crassrail hole project. The FT is frequently promoted as having been written by ‘professional journalist’ who are socially aware , in fact even ‘conventionally left wing’. This is another lie. The FT is corrupt. And the record of the FT’s corruption is to be found on its pages [as well as in its so-called special reports published] throughout its existence. The FT and the Guardian have been parts of the so-called mainstream British media triumvirate along with the BBC which has afforded space to the other falsely painted left wing time serving agent of Big Business capitalism, Ken Livingstone. The FT, the Guardian and the BBC have failed to tell the truth on the domestic economic and asocial conditions... Just as Saturday’s ‘journalism’ showed, even the Rupert Murdoch Times did a better piece of financial journalism than the FT did. Or the BBC. Or the Guardian. That interview with the UK Finance minister - and the bringer of the CRASSrail Bill Alistair Darling, would have been the sort of reporting that the FT should have been able to do. The agenda on the FT has never been clear. It is coloured pink but it is also morally very very dubious. The result is that the FT misspeaks ... By peddling the wasteful obsolete and bogus Crossrail scam, the FT is serving the secret ‘constituency’;, the Big Business while failing to report on the transport needs, the economic needs and the capacities. If Gordon Brown or Alistair Darling [whichever is the ‘face’] fails to make the right decisions, then the ‘ atmosphere of public opinion’ in which they do so will have been as much their fault as it will be the fault of the FT, the Guardian and the BBC... The fault being to tell the truth about the economic facts.... and the social and democratic adverse effects of making the wrong economic decisions...
The FT, the Guardian and the BBC have all been pretence-’sympathiser’ with the ‘socially excluded’ but they are as corrupt and as much on the side of the economic and the social degenerators as their more obvious ‘rival’ publications and media are and have been...
The BBC, the FT and the Guardian NEED there to be social disparities... So that they can then practise [as claiming, falsely, to be concerned for social justice which they NEVER are about] their corrupt craft of playing at being ‘sympathetic. Their corruption of society stinks Because they collude with the creators of social deprivation by making the economic disparity.... As they are showing by their wring and unjustified and unjust promotion of Crossrail which will be another big vehicle to apply to widen the social and economic discrimination, bias and disparities in and AGAINST communities and people in inner city areas like in the East End of London... [To be continued]
THIS EDITION was last updated at 0435 GMT London SUNDAY 20 July 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘Corral hole Big Business agenda’ CAMPAIGN has pointed out for years that the so-called ‘prudent financial journal’ the FT was a platform of corrupt journalism, often misleading the ‘readers’ on the actual economic conditions, trends and the correlated facts, events and plots In the context of the Big Business Crassrail hole plot, the FT has published lies.
Just like the London EVENING Nostandards STANDARD, the FT has published fabricated accounts on the cots, the need and the relevance of the Crassrail hole project. The FT is frequently promoted as having been written by ‘professional journalist’ who are socially aware , in fact even ‘conventionally left wing’. This is another lie. The FT is corrupt. And the record of the FT’s corruption is to be found on its pages [as well as in its so-called special reports published] throughout its existence. The FT and the Guardian have been parts of the so-called mainstream British media triumvirate along with the BBC which has afforded space to the other falsely painted left wing time serving agent of Big Business capitalism, Ken Livingstone. The FT, the Guardian and the BBC have failed to tell the truth on the domestic economic and asocial conditions... Just as Saturday’s ‘journalism’ showed, even the Rupert Murdoch Times did a better piece of financial journalism than the FT did. Or the BBC. Or the Guardian. That interview with the UK Finance minister - and the bringer of the CRASSrail Bill Alistair Darling, would have been the sort of reporting that the FT should have been able to do. The agenda on the FT has never been clear. It is coloured pink but it is also morally very very dubious. The result is that the FT misspeaks ... By peddling the wasteful obsolete and bogus Crossrail scam, the FT is serving the secret ‘constituency’;, the Big Business while failing to report on the transport needs, the economic needs and the capacities. If Gordon Brown or Alistair Darling [whichever is the ‘face’] fails to make the right decisions, then the ‘ atmosphere of public opinion’ in which they do so will have been as much their fault as it will be the fault of the FT, the Guardian and the BBC... The fault being to tell the truth about the economic facts.... and the social and democratic adverse effects of making the wrong economic decisions...
The FT, the Guardian and the BBC have all been pretence-’sympathiser’ with the ‘socially excluded’ but they are as corrupt and as much on the side of the economic and the social degenerators as their more obvious ‘rival’ publications and media are and have been...
The BBC, the FT and the Guardian NEED there to be social disparities... So that they can then practise [as claiming, falsely, to be concerned for social justice which they NEVER are about] their corrupt craft of playing at being ‘sympathetic. Their corruption of society stinks Because they collude with the creators of social deprivation by making the economic disparity.... As they are showing by their wring and unjustified and unjust promotion of Crossrail which will be another big vehicle to apply to widen the social and economic discrimination, bias and disparities in and AGAINST communities and people in inner city areas like in the East End of London... [To be continued]
THIS EDITION was last updated at 0435 GMT London SUNDAY 20 July 2008
BBC Radio 4 PM programme has just confessed to the fact that there is an economic mess: Why t won’t the BBC tell the truth on the wasteful Crossrail
THis AADHIKARonline page was last edited at 1635 GMT Saturday 19 July 2008
By©Muhammd Haque
1635 GMT
London saturday 19 July 2008
The Crossrail hole scam-backing BBC Radio 4 PM programme has just confessed the economy is in a mess because of borrowing....
Question is: Why, then, won’t the BBC tell the truth about the AVOIDABLE public sector BORROWING to the tunes of £Billions that the wasteful Crossrail will IMPOSE on the economy and the public?
[To be continued]
By©Muhammd Haque
1635 GMT
London saturday 19 July 2008
The Crossrail hole scam-backing BBC Radio 4 PM programme has just confessed the economy is in a mess because of borrowing....
Question is: Why, then, won’t the BBC tell the truth about the AVOIDABLE public sector BORROWING to the tunes of £Billions that the wasteful Crossrail will IMPOSE on the economy and the public?
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN gives Boris Johnson another timely advice : DO NOT follow Ken Livingstone in squandering £BIllions
THIS AADHIKARonline page was last edited at 1435 GMT Saturday 19 July 2008
By©©Muhammad Haque
1400 Hrs GMT 1500 Hrs UK Time London Saturday 19 July 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! analysis of crassly conceived Crossrail London BIG BUSINESS City o London SCAM is echoed by the Glasgow Herald and their analysts...By©Muhammad Haque 1400 GMT London Saturday 19 July 2008::A [Glasgow] Herald item from 2007 is as relevant in July 2008 about one of the lies that Crossrail hole plot- Big Business agenda-touts uttered as their argument for £Billions of UK public money to be given to BiG Business...
That lie was given especially frenzied coverage by the cRASSLy edited [!!!!] London EVENING NOSTANDARDS Standard when Ken Livingstone added his lying skills and joined the sub-racist campaign against Scotland as a whole. Livingstone the chameleon posed as a fanatic English nationalist, verging on the peripheries of the Dagenham people with whom he picked fights too in his desperate bid to a appear keen to be all pc [‘politically correct’] in all sorts of contradictory ways. Livingstone came unstuck on the Scottish prejudice issue...
But he did cause damage to anti-racist thinking... And why would Livingstone back any racist lie to ‘justify’ a Big Business London Crossrail hole ploy to loot the UK public? Why else than to get ‘votes’ of course !!!!???
But Livingstone reckoned without the Tories... Even by Livingstone's own sub-racist record, the Tories could out-racist Livingstone any time. Or at any election...!!! As he has found out.... For the first time in his really parasitic career of 40 years in de facto public-paid positions in the name of London, Ken Livingstone was actually comprehensively defeated for the first significant time at an election held under ‘normal British conditions’. That is my way of summing up what constitutes the norm for a British election.
Although the perennially perniciously lying Guardian and some of its den of liars’ more s paraders of the cult of Livingstone have refused to accept the result of the 1 May 2008 London Assembly and ‘mayor’ election. Almost reminiscent of the cheer-leading propaganda outfits in regions of the world where democracy even by the normal British conditions, is not allowed, the Guardian newspaper group in London has refused to recognise the 1 May 2008 election results because the voters were seen to have voted for someone other than the incumbent that the lying Guardian preferred....
Livingstone’s resort to sub-racist anti-Scottish desperation was unmistakable in 2007. We have shown at every stage that Crossrail is crass because it is essentially NOT about solving the transport needs of London.... We have said and SHOWN this since 31 January 2004 when the KHOODEELAAR! campaign actually began in the Brick Lane....Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 area....
.In the 55 months since January 2004, we have referred to and shown the evidence of hundreds of other intervening items to substantiate our thesis that Crossrail was CRASSrail. So when Livingstone took refuse in the sub-racist tent and berated the Scots collectively for what he suggested was the Scots’ greed at the expense of the English, any reasonable, honest and competent student of the reality of the UK could see that Livingstone was wrong on every level... and that Livingstone could only have been motivated in his sub-racist attack on the Scots by petty personal careerism and greed for the perils and the ‘power’ of office..... For the purpose of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail hole plot in London, Livingstone's dire sub-racisim too showed that CROSSRAIL, London was crassly conceived. That it had to be 'justified' by inciting sub-racist prejudice against people hundreds of miles away from London, PROVED, AGAIN, that the London Crossrail scam was NOT FOUNDED PRIMARILY on the urgent transport needs of the people of and in London. ........
[To be continued]
By©©Muhammad Haque
1400 Hrs GMT 1500 Hrs UK Time London Saturday 19 July 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! analysis of crassly conceived Crossrail London BIG BUSINESS City o London SCAM is echoed by the Glasgow Herald and their analysts...By©Muhammad Haque 1400 GMT London Saturday 19 July 2008::A [Glasgow] Herald item from 2007 is as relevant in July 2008 about one of the lies that Crossrail hole plot- Big Business agenda-touts uttered as their argument for £Billions of UK public money to be given to BiG Business...
That lie was given especially frenzied coverage by the cRASSLy edited [!!!!] London EVENING NOSTANDARDS Standard when Ken Livingstone added his lying skills and joined the sub-racist campaign against Scotland as a whole. Livingstone the chameleon posed as a fanatic English nationalist, verging on the peripheries of the Dagenham people with whom he picked fights too in his desperate bid to a appear keen to be all pc [‘politically correct’] in all sorts of contradictory ways. Livingstone came unstuck on the Scottish prejudice issue...
But he did cause damage to anti-racist thinking... And why would Livingstone back any racist lie to ‘justify’ a Big Business London Crossrail hole ploy to loot the UK public? Why else than to get ‘votes’ of course !!!!???
But Livingstone reckoned without the Tories... Even by Livingstone's own sub-racist record, the Tories could out-racist Livingstone any time. Or at any election...!!! As he has found out.... For the first time in his really parasitic career of 40 years in de facto public-paid positions in the name of London, Ken Livingstone was actually comprehensively defeated for the first significant time at an election held under ‘normal British conditions’. That is my way of summing up what constitutes the norm for a British election.
Although the perennially perniciously lying Guardian and some of its den of liars’ more s paraders of the cult of Livingstone have refused to accept the result of the 1 May 2008 London Assembly and ‘mayor’ election. Almost reminiscent of the cheer-leading propaganda outfits in regions of the world where democracy even by the normal British conditions, is not allowed, the Guardian newspaper group in London has refused to recognise the 1 May 2008 election results because the voters were seen to have voted for someone other than the incumbent that the lying Guardian preferred....
Livingstone’s resort to sub-racist anti-Scottish desperation was unmistakable in 2007. We have shown at every stage that Crossrail is crass because it is essentially NOT about solving the transport needs of London.... We have said and SHOWN this since 31 January 2004 when the KHOODEELAAR! campaign actually began in the Brick Lane....Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 area....
.In the 55 months since January 2004, we have referred to and shown the evidence of hundreds of other intervening items to substantiate our thesis that Crossrail was CRASSrail. So when Livingstone took refuse in the sub-racist tent and berated the Scots collectively for what he suggested was the Scots’ greed at the expense of the English, any reasonable, honest and competent student of the reality of the UK could see that Livingstone was wrong on every level... and that Livingstone could only have been motivated in his sub-racist attack on the Scots by petty personal careerism and greed for the perils and the ‘power’ of office..... For the purpose of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail hole plot in London, Livingstone's dire sub-racisim too showed that CROSSRAIL, London was crassly conceived. That it had to be 'justified' by inciting sub-racist prejudice against people hundreds of miles away from London, PROVED, AGAIN, that the London Crossrail scam was NOT FOUNDED PRIMARILY on the urgent transport needs of the people of and in London. ........
[To be continued]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the 'Crossrail Bill' [a Bill in UK Parliament]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SGqe5VQwLHI/AAAAAAAABfc/MEjjMWby2dc/S226/Khoodeelaar!+try+this+logo.gif)
![London [Rupert Murdoched] Times, Wed. 7 May 2008](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitiFRN6uO_MOdYMby0s7ow2zcBaewOKfl3k4QdCPcahu1IKXx6sl7Gs4aO9VrAhN8gQJvYb1a2JnODsTUsMks_LtoZVuqc64whMkMitNKVz1bijPST853uNwRNG8x2PVFl1kqRez8M3b-j/s226/1676149.jpg)
