Is Brown going to be 'economical with the truth' at the 'economy talks' Or is he going to own up to one error and scrap Crossrail thus freeing £10Bn

Muhammad Haque economic, and ethical commentary about CRASS role [=’Crossrail’ hole plot] player [at the newt’s luring!!!] Gordon Brown 0955 Hrs GMT 15.04.2008:

The BBC TV is showing on its screen these three words, 'BROWN ECONOMY TALKS'. This raises the inevitable and the essential Khoodeelaar! Question -

Does it mean Brown is going to be economical with the truth? Or is he going to tell the truth and start by scrapping the Crossrail hole scam?

That act alone could make bvadly needed ‘liquidity’ available in the ‘planned’ period to the value of almost £10 Billion to be put to better [='prudent'!] use than being pilfered into the pockets of Bechtel, Cliff Mumm et al...! ????


[To be continued]

Is Brown going to be 'economical with the truth' at the 'economy talks' Or is he going to own up to one error and scrap Crossrail thus freeing £5Bn

Muhammad Haque economic, and ethical commentary about CRASS role [=’Crossrail’ hole plot] player Gordon Brown
0955 Hrs GMT 15.04.2008:

The BBC TV is showing on its screen these three words, 'BROWN ECONOMY TALKS'.

This raises the inevitable and the essential Khoodeelaar!V Queston - Does it mean Brown is going to be economical with the truth? Or is he going to tell the truth and start by scrapping the Crossrail scam. That act alone will make ‘liquidity’ available in the ‘planned’ period to the value of of almost £10 Billion to be put to better [='prudent'!] use than being pilfered into the pockets of Bechtel, Cliff Mumm et al...! [To be continued]

Khoodeelaar! RESPONDS to UK Conservative Party 'leader' David Cameron MP, as based on the 'phone -in ' slot on 'BBC 5 Lies'-

Editor©Muhammad Haque

0938 Hrs GMT 1038 hrs UK time London Tuesday 15 April 2008: Khoodeelaar! RESPONDS to UK Conservative Party 'leader' David Cameron MP, as based on the 'phone -in ' programme he appeared on this morning [BBC radio 5 Lies]...


Khoodeelaar! challenges David Cameron to explain his contradictory and therefore misleading and therefore dishonest and or incompetent - statements and positions on Council Tax bill/bills and his support for Crossrail which will definitely DEPEND on ordinary London people and families being forced to pay huge extra Council tax.....


No to Crossrail hole agenda, the Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the ‘Crossrail Bill’ [now in the UK ‘legislative’ “House of Lords’] tells the official ‘Opposition’ ‘leader’ in the UK “House of Commons’ David Cameron that he will be known as David Ca-Moron unless he comes out and tells the country why he is so duplicitous and why he says, [as he has just in the past hour done on the BBC radio 5 Lies] that ‘Council tax is one of the most painful taxes’ that people have to pay and that therefore he has been [as he claimed on Radio 5 Lies] saying to his ‘party’ candidates at the scheduled 1 May 2008 local council elections that they must keep the Council tax bills low...


If he is telling the truth there then how is it that Ca-Moron has not OPPOSED the very Council tax-raising CRASSrail scam....


Khoodeelaar! challenges to David ca-Moron today include th and other gems... gems of truth about the lying politics....

Ca-Moron has also backed the Blair corruption scam over the BAE SFO corruption and bribery....

So what if ANY moral and ethical point is there of being the ‘Opposition’? Khoodeelaar! again challenges Ca-Moron to explain why he has not followed up the promise that Francis Maude gave to Khoodeelaar! two years ago! In April 2006 Francis Maude old Khoodeelaar! that their Party MPs were soon going to speak in the House of Commons against the Crossrail hole scam.... The hole was NOT necessary .. Maude had said in his exclusive interview with Khoodeelaar! [which has been published on the world wide web on many site since that very day]... Why is Ca-Moron being coy over Crossrail? Or is ‘ RAISING Council tax bill is ok for Crossrail, because the USA Bechtel Big Business says so? Is Ca-Moron party to the latest Military industrial Com;ex deals os that they will facilitate the UK public funds to be challenged into the MIC pockets......[To be continued]Editor©Muhammad Haque

0938 Hrs GMT 1038 hrs UK time London Tuesday 15 April 2008: Khoodeelaar! RESPONDS to UK Conservative Party 'leader' David Cameron MP, as based on the 'phone -in ' programme he appeared on this morning [BBC radio 5 Lies]...


Khoodeelaar! challenges David Cameron to explain his contradictory and therefore misleading and therefore dishonest and or incompetent - statements and positions on Council Tax bill/bills and his support for Crossrail which will definitely DEPEND on ordinary London people and families being forced to pay huge extra Council tax.....


No to Crossrail hole agenda, the Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the ‘Crossrail Bill’ [now in the UK ‘legislative’ “House of Lords’] tells the official ‘Opposition’ ‘leader’ in the UK “House of Commons’ David Cameron that he will be known as David Ca-Moron unless he comes out and tells the country why he is so duplicitous and why he says, [as he has just in the past hour done on the BBC radio 5 Lies] that ‘Council tax is one of the most painful taxes’ that people have to pay and that therefore he has been [as he claimed on Radio 5 Lies] saying to his ‘party’ candidates at the scheduled 1 May 2008 local council elections that they must keep the Council tax bills low...


If he is telling the truth there then how is it that Ca-Moron has not OPPOSED the very Council tax-raising CRASSrail scam....


Khoodeelaar! challenges to David ca-Moron today include th and other gems... gems of truth about the lying politics....

Ca-Moron has also backed the Blair corruption scam over the BAE SFO corruption and bribery....

So what if ANY moral and ethical point is there of being the ‘Opposition’? Khoodeelaar! again challenges Ca-Moron to explain why he has not followed up the promise that Francis Maude gave to Khoodeelaar! two years ago! In April 2006 Francis Maude old Khoodeelaar! that their Party MPs were soon going to speak in the House of Commons against the Crossrail hole scam.... The hole was NOT necessary .. Maude had said in his exclusive interview with Khoodeelaar! [which has been published on the world wide web on many site since that very day]... Why is Ca-Moron being coy over Crossrail? Or is ‘ RAISING Council tax bill is ok for Crossrail, because the USA Bechtel Big Business says so? Is Ca-Moron party to the latest Military industrial Comlex deals so that they will facilitate the UK public funds to be challenged into the MIC pockets......[To be continued]

World class rise in food prices in UK will not deter Gordon Brown from carrying on with the charade that Big Business is 'good' ..........

Muhammad Haque 0500 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 15 April 2008:

World class rise in food prices in UK will not deter Gordon Brown from carrying on with the charade that Big Business is 'good' and that Big Business is 'compatible' with 'British vah-loos'...As Gordon Brown's competence rating [for he and his own entourage take serious note of such things] continues to go down.. Gordon Brown clings on to the slimy image of Crossrail Ken Livingstone and the two of them are heading for a world class crash as they defy the laws of ethics, morality and ordinary gravity.....


..[To be continued]

Channel 4 News fronter Jon Slow in the UK is plugged furiously as almost having integrity.. His reputation is in tatters, as is Gordon Brown's

By©Muhammad Haque
1840 Hrs GMT
1940 Hrs UK Time
London
Monday

14 April 2008

Channel 4 News fronter Jon Slow AGAIN showed his backwardness when he failed to take his own questioning of Tory George Oborne to its logical point...

When Oborne said that unlike Gordon Brown the Tories would have spent the money BETTER, SLOW should have asked Osborne to name at least some representative [as examples, as evidence of Gordon Brown’s incompetence and bad management of the resource] projects on which Gordon Brown had spent the money BADLY...

Had Jon SLOW been honest and had he even known his own news programme [which in October 2007 published a list of criticisms of the Crossrail plot] he would have asked Osborne whether Osborne would scrap Crossrail to save money......But Slow is not honest. Nor is he as knowledgeable about the ‘subject matters of his own news programmes’ ....

So he did not ask Osborne about scrapping Crossrail....Slow thus failed to follow up any other aspect of Osborne’s assertions... Had SLOW had the knowledge and or had SLOW been honest, SLOW would have asked Osborne about the ‘ECONOMIST ‘ magazine article and quizzed Osborne on the UK constitution... and the role of the UK parliament in holding the incumbent Prime Minister to account on such a level that the ‘UK's’ resources would have been only applied and or used when there was genuine evidence and transparent case made fro such uses....Unlike the UK Parliament being used as a stooge place which is not holding the Government to account and is in fact allowing wrong and unaccounted measures being pushed through parliament at the behest fo secret forces that are mainly Big Business and the military industrial complex ...........................[To be continued]

Gordon Brown's prudential reputation is in tatters - as is the reputation of Channel 4 News fronter Jon Slow. Slow was too slow ... 14.04.2008

By©Muhammad Haque
1840 Hrs GMT
LONDON
MONDAY
14 April 2008

Channel 4 News fronter Jon Slow AGAIN showed his backwardness when he failed to take his own questioning of Tory George Oborne to its logical point... When Oborne said that unlike Gordon Brown the Tories would have spent the money BETTER, SLOW should have asked Osborne to name at least some representative [as examples, as evidence of Gordon Brown’s incompetence and bad management of the resource] projects on which Gordon Brown had spent the money BADLY... Had Jon SLOW been honest and had he even known his own news programme [which in October 2007 published a list of criticisms of the Crossrail plot] he would have asked Osborne whether Osborne would scrap Crossrail to save money......But Slow is not honest. Nor is he as knowledgeable about the ‘subject matters of his own news programmes’ ....So he did not ask Osborne about scrapping Crossrail....Slow thus failed to follow up any other aspect of Osborne’s assertions... Had SLOW had the knowledge and or had SLOW been honest, SLOW would have asked Osborne about the ‘ECONOMIST ‘ magazine article and quizzed Osborne on the UK constitution... and the role of the UK parliament in holding the incumbent Prime Minister to account on such a level that the ‘UK's’ resources would have been only applied and or sued when there was genuine evidence and transparent case made fro such uses....Unlike the UK Parliament being used as a stooge place which is not holding the Government to account and is in fact allowing wrong and unaccounted measures being pushed through parliament at the behest fo secret forces that are mainly Big Business and the military industrial complex ...........................[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN response to Gordon Brown's unwise repetition of endorsement Ken Livingstone today - here, soon

KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN response to Gordon Brown's unwise repetition of endorsement of Ken Livingstone today - here, soon

For over four years, Khoodeelaar! the East London community campaign has been going on against Big Business using the UK central Govt ...

Right now [as at Sunday 13 April 2008], this campaign is formally before the UK legislative House of Lords!

That is the last leg of the 'Crossrail Bill' within the UK domestic ‘constitutional framework’.. and the Khoodeelaar! campaign has been as vigourous and as ahead of the Big Business lobbys as it could be imagined possible... So, do the people of the East End of London know about that by reading their 'local' paper?

The ‘East London Advertiser' ?

Certainly not....

How come?

Isn't the 'East London Advertiser' the SAME ‘local paper ‘that has itself made 'news' in the ‘newspaper trade press’ about its ‘newsworthy’ ''journalism'' ?

Indeed it is...

For over four years, Khoodeelaar! the East London community campaign has been going on against Big Business using the UK central Govt to pocket £Billions under Crossrail that has been floated as a ‘public transport ’ measure.

For over four years, the ‘local’ ‘East London IDIOTISER’ has been printing lies about the area... At one point, Khoodeelaar! took appropriate steps which resulted in the personnel and 'ownership' change at the 'Idiotiser'.

The full account of the Khoodeelaar! action against the Idiotiser will be told soon.

For now, the issue is the lying East `London Idiotiser corrupt denial of the fact that the campaign against Crossrail has been taking place ‘cia and in the legislative House of Lords’.

[To be continued]

Muhammad Haque 2050 Hrs GMT London Sunday 13 April 2008:

Muhammad Haque 2050 Hrs GMT London Sunday 13 April 2008:

This Khoodeelaar! demonstration [on the right] photo shows a group of of Whitechapel, Bethnal Green 'south' residents who joined Khoodeelaar! demonstration against Tower Hamlets Council on 11 September 2007. This was outside Mulberry Place, minutes before the Khoodeelaar! “demand on Tower Hamlets Council to STOP colluding with Crossrail hole attacks plot against the East End of London” was renewed to a 'full council' meeting of the same Tower Hamlets Council that took place on that same evening [11 September 2008] [To be continued]

BBC's 'Politics Show', Brian Paddick left out all references to Crossrail.... A review, here soon

1910 GMT London Sunday 13 April 2008: Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Agenda notes the fact that at least on the BBC's 'Politics Show', Brian Paddick left out all references to Crossrail.... A review of the day's 'media references; to the 'London 1 May 2008 mayor elections' - here, shortly

Muhammad Haque commenting on the Times, London 'legal analysis' of the High Court ruling on the BAE SFO Blair corruption deal

"April 10, 2008
Analysis: what next after High Court ruling on BAE?

Frances Gibb, Legal Editor

When Tony Blair, as Prime Minister, approached the Attorney-General, Lord Goldsmith, QC, to argue the case for the dropping of the corruption investigation into the BAE arms deal, he insisted that it was a matter ultimately for the Government’s chief law officer. But — justifying his approach — Mr Blair said that this was the “clearest case for intervention in the public interest he had seen”.

Today, delivering one of the most damning criticisms of ministers seen in the courts, Lord Justice Moses turned those same words on their head, saying: “We agree.”

The case, he said, was a paramount instance of the need for the courts to intervene and uphold the rule of law; to stand firm in the face of a threat and say the threat should have been resisted.

In doing so, the judge, sitting with Mr Justice Sullilvan, did not mince his words. Ministers, including the Prime Minister, had advised the Attorney-General and the Director of the Serious Fraud Office — then Robert Wardle — that to continue the investigation would have grave consequences, both for the arms trade and the safety of British citizens and service personnel. In light of what he regarded as a grave risk to life, the SFO director halted the investigation.

RELATED LINKS
Dropping Saudi-BAE bribery probe 'unlawful'
His decision was challenged by the Corner House Research and Campaign Against the Arms Trade. Defending its position, the SFO argued that its director was entitled to surrender to the threat and said that the court should accept that, while a matter of “regret”, such threats were a “part of life”.

Today Lord Justice Moses and Mr Justice Sullivan unequivocally rejected that view: “so bleak a picture of the impotence of the law invites at least dismay, if not outrage”, Lord Justice Moses said. In a series of caustic comments he affirmed the importance of the courts in standing up for the law and savaged the SFO director for acting unlawfully in “buckling” to threats. Those threats, he said, had been aimed at this country’s legal system.

He said: “It is difficult to identify any integrity in the role of the courts to uphold the rule of law, if the courts are to abdicate in response to a threat from a foreign power.”

And: “We fear for the administration of justice if it can be perverted by a threat.”

He concluded: “No one, whether within this country or outside, is entitled to interfere with the course of justice.”

So what now? The SFO is considering the judgment, and could of course appeal. The Government is likely to fight tooth and nail to resist any pressure that it re-open an investigation that could damage Saudi relations — commercially, diplomatically and above all in terms of counter-terrorism intelligence.

As the judgment stands, it is likely that the SFO would have at least to revisit its decision to halt the inquiry. Whether that would mean that it came to another conclusion and reopened the whole investigation is another matter.

A fresh case would be made as to the likely damage to security and terrorism; and this time there could be no argument as to the loss of what the Government called “the largest export contract” in the past decade, the procurement of the next generation of attack aircraft — the Typhoon — because the deal is done.

As for the law officers: Lord Goldsmith has already gone from office, as has the SFO director, Robert Wardle, who will be gone in ten days' time. But the SFO’s reputation is severely damaged. Although it now has a new director, he will have a job on his hands to restore it.

As for relations between ministers and the Attorney-General, Lord Goldsmith’s legacy — not least because of BAE — was to prompt a review. His successor, Baroness Scotland of Asthal, QC, has succeeded in fighting of calls for the role to be reformed significantly. Some may now think that decision by ministers premature.

HAVE YOUR SAY

They're all guilty but what can anyone do about it?
paul, poole, gb
It is commendable that something like this involving bribery and threats from another country has been brought into the public domain. But how many times has it happened and we hear nothing of it?

What now for UK/Saudi relations? Are they far from Iraq...
Brett Sinclair, monaco,
Perverting the course of justice. As clear a case as there can be, and no-one is denying it. Surely then, Tony Blair has committed a crime.
Loosehead, Basingstoke,


This is the latest confirmation of the NORM of the widespread abuse of Parliament and constitutionality by the executive in the UK. Either there is rule of law or there is not. Where have the opposition spokespeople been? Why hasn’t there been ANY move by the mainstream Opposition in the ‘elected’ House of Commons to force compliance with the rule of law by the Executive?

Why haven THEY been the applicants for this judicial review of the highly corrupt behaviour by the Blairing regime?

This one is in the news because of the High Court action. How many thousands of similarly corrupt deals and decisions are being suppressed as we all hear about this particular one?

You say that Goldsmith is no longer in office. You mean that therefore he is exempt from liability for such an outrageous and open defiance of the rule of law! Is that acceptable? What kind of immunity must be allowed from answering on two of the most damaging violations he has committed against ethics and against constitutionality ?

How is Goldsmith able to get away like this, time after time?

Who are his de facto partners in the grand violations of the constitution?
Muhammad Haque, London, UK"

Muhammad Haque commenting on the Times, London 'legal analysis' of the High Court ruling on the BAE SFO Blair corruption deal

This is the latest confirmation of the NORM of the widespread abuse of Parliament and constitutionality by the executive in the UK.

Either there is rule of law or there is not.

Where have the opposition spokespeople been?

Why hasn’t there been ANY move by the mainstream Opposition in the ‘elected’ House of Commons to force compliance with the rule of law by the Executive?

Why haven THEY been the applicants for this judicial review of the highly corrupt behaviour by the Blairing regime?

This one is in the news because of the High Court action. How many thousands of similarly corrupt deals and decisions are being suppressed as we all hear about this particular one?

You say that Goldsmith is no longer in office. You [Frances Gibb, timesonline, 10.04.2008] mean that therefore he is exempt from liability for such an outrageous and open defiance of the rule of law!

Is that acceptable?

What kind of immunity must be allowed from answering on two of the most damaging violations he has committed against ethics and against constitutionality ?

How is Goldsmith able to get away like this, time after time?

Who are his de facto partners in the grand violations of the constitution?

Shouldn't David Ca-Moron prove that he has moral courage and demand that the BAE SFO corruption be exposed by having a full Public Inquiry?

Muhammad Haque commenting in the piece by Frances Gibb as published on the Times online today:

"This is the latest confirmation of the widespread abuse of Parliament and constitutionality by the executive in the UK. Either there is rule of law or there is not. Where have the opposition spokespeople been ?

Why haven' THEY been the applicants for this judicial review of the highly corrupt behaviour by the Blairing regime?

This on is in the news because of the High Court action. How many thousands of similarly corrupt deals and decisions are being suppressed as we all hear about this particular one?

You say that Goldsmith is no longer in office. Is that acceptable? What kind of immunity must be allowed from answering on two of the most damaging violations he has committed against ethics and against constitutionality ?

How is Goldsmith able to get away like this, time after time?

Who are his de facto partners in the grand violations of the constitution?"

[To be continued]

Will the Official Opposition Leader in the Official Parliament show he has ‘any’ morality? Is 'Dave' more than a Ca-Moron..?

1330 Hrs GMT
1430 Hrs UK
London Thursday
10 April 2008

The Muhammad Haque ethical commentary on the wasteland of morality that is the British Parliament: first comments on the High court ruling on the Blair BAE SFO corruption

Will the Official Opposition Leader in Britain's Official Parliament show the [Oops! ‘any’] evidence that he has any morality? Does he deserve to be called Ca-Moron?
Is he really, truly no longer a thug?

If he is no longer a thug then how come that ‘Dave’ ends up backing the Blairing immorality at every crucial stage?

Why does ‘Dave’ back the Brown-fronted policies that Blair left behind?

[To be continued]

"Do not ignore constitutional law objections to the unconstitutional way that the Crossrail hoe plot is being pushed through parliament...."

1210 Hrs GMT
London
Thursday
10 April 2008

Khoodeelaar! No to Big Business Crossrail hole plotters within the Gordon Brown fronted, Blaired regime: "Do not ignore our constitutional law objections to the unconstitutional way that the Crossrail hoe plot is being pushed through parliament...."

The London High Court's ruling that the anti-corruption body the UK's SFO itself acted illegally, that is CORRUPTLY, proves case against Big Business!

1130 Hrs GMT 1230 Hrs UK time London Thursday 10 April 2008:Khoodeelaar! No to Big Business Crossrail hole plot and agenda.... The UK Government’s own ‘Serious Fraud Office’ acted illegally over the BAE corruption! That the SFA covered up Tony Blair’s corruption regime. A number of ‘anti-corruption and anti-militaristic’ groups including one called the “Corner House Research and the Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT)” has achieved this significant legal vindication today. This vindication of the principle in the High Court in London confirms the constitutional law points that Khoodeelaar! has made all along. Including the fact that Big Business interests have taken over the setting of the agenda in the DfT and elsewhere in the UK state....


Khoodeelaar! comment at 1140 Hrs GMT Thursday 10 April 2008: o
n the Big business liars who are bent on keeping the public in the dark about the economic crisis caused by capitalistic plunder, abuse and irresponsibility - and above all, greed....: So the Confederation [Big Business agency, the Conspiracy more like] of British Industry, the 'CBI' fronter Richard Lambert was way too upbeat when he appeared on the BBC this lunchtime, commenting on the interest rate cut as announced by the Bank of England.... at midday [exactly] London time [1100 Hrs GMT]

Impending gloom and the Poverty of Gordon Brown - the updater commentary on the emptiness and the immorality of Gordon Brown's regime -1

By©Muhammad Haque
1305 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday 9 April 2008



Poverty of Gordon Brown - subject that is key to the wider poverty he is set to spread across society and the world -

Gordon Brown is causing poverty in Britain by colluding with Big Business. And by in effect following the agenda set by Big Business.

This is seen in his backing for Bechtel-type looters

Brown’s so-called socialist ‘new best colluder’ Ken Livingstone has been having such a notoriously deeply mysterious and inexplicable relationship with those Bechtel-type looters.

Indeed, Livingstone has already even RECOMMENDED Bechtel as in effect the most suitable candidate for a multi£Million Crossrail -linked contract, ahead of formal tendering etc.

Livingstone's ‘socialist’ propagandists would not find anything wrong in the record of his payment of £Millions of public money to the [‘retired’] CIA man Bob Kiley who did not hide his contempt for democracy when he prescribed on the BBC that ‘elected’ [local councillors and MPs] should be locked up in a room and forced to agree to publicly fund the Big Business Crossrail scam...

Anyone with any even the most basic understanding of legitimacy, democracy, accountability and human rights, would not be able to allow that mentality to be treated as being acceptable in a ‘publicly employed’ decision-maker who was given such powers and so much public money by Livingstone as ‘the Transport Commissioner’ in the name of `London......

Yet Kiley was defended by Livingstone... Even as Livingstone was forced to let Kiley go... The ‘force’ was in the rare newspaper interview in which Kiley admitted, without any regret or remorse, to being an alcoholic. An alcoholic who had no idea why he was paid so much public money by Ken Livingstone... It wasn’t Livingstone who had found anything wrong at all in Kiley alcohol addiction.... Indeed, Livingstone boasted that one of the ‘qualities’ he admired in Kiley was the way that Kiley INTIMIDATED people during negotiations...!

Against this background, a look at Gordon Brown’s endorsement of Crossrail and Brown's backing for the Big Business Crossrail hole plot-backer Ken Livingstone is very timely and necessary.

And it is not just in Brown’s capitulation to and collusion with the Bechtel types....


He is even more deeply involved with some of the foulest practitioners of the corrupt craft of neo conservative capitalism... It is worth noting that during Brown’s official tenure at No 11 Downing Street over ten years, he, Gordon Brown, made it more easy for the world’s crassest capitalist neo-con looters to arrive in Britain and to set about exploiting all the imaginable loopholes they could find to rob the society of its resources.,...

Enter Goldman Sachs and all that they signify, imply, typify and represent about Gordon Brown's ‘prudent’ practices and policies....and records...

The poverty of understanding that Gordon Brown suffers from comes across every time he spouts out the intellectually offensive, empty and and the very unsound phrases like 'child poverty’.

That two word phrase was devised in Britain by sub-thinking ‘thinkers’ who neither understood poverty nor human rights.

They were by a decade or so, forerunners to the likes of Jack Straw.

There their differences vanish.

Like Straw, they were liars. Like Straw, they are liars. And they are destined to stay liars.

How is Straw a liar?

Straw is a liar because when in formal opposition [before May 1997] he was posing as one of those Bliar-fronted Opposition party ‘high flyers’ who knew his ethics and his morality. Especially so about human rights and justice.

As a technically law-schooled careerist, Straw is one of those professional liars and cheats who are allowed a wide degree of ‘benefits of the doubt’ [=’deference’] by the ‘mainstream’ media.

Consequently, the idiot reporters [for idiots they mostly are] never ever expose the lying Straw. And they never queston him.

And the reason why they don’t do either is because they are so so deeply ignorant about things to do with the substance of policy and practice. And they are a million miles away from the world of scrutiny. Of evidence. Of ethics. Of legitimacy....

[To be continued]

Brown must stop behaving imprudently

Muhammad Haque
1025 GMT Weds 9 April 2008:

Brown must stop behaving imprudently
That stunt [on Tuesday 8 April 2008] about fiddling with 'key workers' 'equity' 'sharing' was a serious joke This is no time for indulging in lethal jokes..... He must address the main resource the people and find out why so many people in Britain are not being given the right economy and social rewards and returns He need not look far... Most of the abuse of Govt power [small, local, central and big: micro and macro] over public funds are abused... Correct that and Brown [and the country] will have a big release of much needed liquidity....He could start by scrapping CROSSRAIL and there will instantly be £Billions available by that scrapping alone.... [To be continued]

Gordon Brown must tell the truth about Big Business being bad for the country. He could do much worse than scrap the Crossrail Bill!

By©Muhammad Haque
1005 Hrs GMT

London
Wednesday 9 April 2008:


The amount involved in the crisis is well over £500 Billion... and the measure of it is not in pound sterling or in euro or in the us dollar...

It has got to be measured in credibility.. loss of credibility, not 'just credit'..

It is CREDIBILITY LOSS by Gordon Brown.. and his company.. they must stop THAT slide...

THERE is the point of critical mass If they keep lying, the thing will really expand out of all known control...

How long more must the people of London wait before the 'EVENING STANDARD' tells the truth about the CRASSly conceived, wasteful, obsolete Crossrail?

How long more must the people of London wait before the 'EVENING STANDARD' tells the truth - about the CRASSly conceived, wasteful, obsolete Crossrail?
_____________________________________________________________________

"Gordon Brown has got to stop lying for Big Business perpetrators, offenders and criminals..."

By©Muhammad Haque
1520 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday
8 April 2008

Gordon Brown may not know this but he is lying when he still boasts about allegedly reducing ‘child poverty’. He is lying because he is hiding the extent of poverty that ‘adults’ experience across the urban and the rural uk every day .... Brown must get off that lying Blairing horse... He must also stop lying by confecting miniature sound bites containing scattering of ‘business’....

There is NO ordinary, sustainable credible business going on in atmospheres of institutionalised social division, social exclusion, social underachievement, educational [albeit, in e effect' 'schooling'] apartheid persistent and pervasive prejudice, discrimination, lack of trust and emptiness caused by spiritual bankruptcy at the absence and loss of ethics....

One of the capitalistic ‘ethos’ that Brown himself is prone to dissemblingly peddling while wearing - or posing to wear- , as he ridiculously does, the guise of being somehow linked with a moral political heritage, is ‘confidence’. But how can there be confidence when mass fraud is being perpetrated in the Brown fronting the Blaired Britain by those who occupy publicly paid and publicly-’legitimised’ positions......Brown has got to stop lying for Big Business perpetrators, offenders and criminals,.... and he could start by telling the truth about how the corrupter of `London ken Loss Livingstone had dragged him into making that crass commitment of £Billions of UK public money for the obsolete, wasteful CRASSrail....

[To be continued]