1240 Hrs GMT 1340 Hrs UKTime London Monday 2 June 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot' CAMPAIGN is also against the ADDING of poverty, deprivation to the community of ordinary people in the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets...
The KHOODEELAAR! campaign has said that the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council has been and remains guilt of a seriously antisocial and corrupting lie in that it equates poverty with 'regeneration'.. Khoodeelaar! has therefor described Tower Hamlets Council as a degenerating Council... Over decades, Tower Hamlets Council has let the community down, by institutionally, organisationally, managerially and wrongly and wrongfully 'praising' the causers and the perpetrators of underachievement, dis-education and mis-edcucaton....
Monday, June 2, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot' CAMPAIGN is also against the ADDING of poverty, deprivation to the community of ordinary East End..
1240 Hrs GMT 1340 Hrs UKTime London Monday 2 June 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot' CAMPAIGN is also against the ADDING of poverty, deprivation to the community of ordinary people in the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets...
The KHOODEELAAR! campaign has said that the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council has been and remains guilt of a seriously antisocial and corrupting lie in that it equates poverty with 'regeneration'.. Khoodeelaar! has therefor described Tower Hamlets Council as a degenerating Council... Over decades, Tower Hamlets Council has let the community down, by institutionally, organsiatonally, mangerially and wrongly and wrongfully 'praising' the causers and the perpetrators of underachievement, dis-education and mis-edcucaton....
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot' CAMPAIGN is also against the ADDING of poverty, deprivation to the community of ordinary people in the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets...
The KHOODEELAAR! campaign has said that the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council has been and remains guilt of a seriously antisocial and corrupting lie in that it equates poverty with 'regeneration'.. Khoodeelaar! has therefor described Tower Hamlets Council as a degenerating Council... Over decades, Tower Hamlets Council has let the community down, by institutionally, organsiatonally, mangerially and wrongly and wrongfully 'praising' the causers and the perpetrators of underachievement, dis-education and mis-edcucaton....
Khoodeelaar! says No to Crossrail hole AGENDA because that agenda is to make East End people poorer.....
By©Muhammad Haque
1220 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 2 June 2008
The poverty that dominates the evidence about the East End of London has been in the main CREATED poverty. As all poverty is. But in the case of inner city East End of London, POVERTY HAS BEEN CREATED.
As poverty is about human beings, the human beings that make up the community in ordinary East End have been treated by the controlling forces in the economy with contempt.
The result has been that in the 'schools' and other 'institutions of education', there has been DEFICIT EDUCATION. Rather than positive education, the schools in Tower Hamlets have been the sources of DEFICIT education. In other words, they have ADDED to the negative human p[profiles of the vast majority of their 'students' across DECADES.
This has created the mainly underachieving, under-schooled, non-educated parts in the population that has been also denied the access to activities that would provide decent sustained incomes...
Like the man, a Bangladeshi one, who has been seen to be asking for money from passers-by on the Whitechapel Road... Those who know him also know his age and his history... He is known to spend the money on alcohol...
A more stark reality would be hard to imagine in the East End...
Why?
Because everyone knows that alcoholism is a road to self destruction... And the destruction of all around the person......
And everyone also knows that 'culturally, Bangladeshis are a million miles away from anything to do with alcohol'.
Or are they ?
And how could Bangladeshis get to be alcoholics in the East End of London? Or in any other part of London or the UK!!!
This is the question that is linked with our examination of the many ';benefits' that the pluggers of Crossrail hoe,attacks peddle....
They say that 'Crossrail would bring benefits to the East End'.
They don't mean benefits that are rationally described...
They mean distorted benefits. In fact they mean deficits that destroy the person. The community...
[To be continued]
1220 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 2 June 2008
The poverty that dominates the evidence about the East End of London has been in the main CREATED poverty. As all poverty is. But in the case of inner city East End of London, POVERTY HAS BEEN CREATED.
As poverty is about human beings, the human beings that make up the community in ordinary East End have been treated by the controlling forces in the economy with contempt.
The result has been that in the 'schools' and other 'institutions of education', there has been DEFICIT EDUCATION. Rather than positive education, the schools in Tower Hamlets have been the sources of DEFICIT education. In other words, they have ADDED to the negative human p[profiles of the vast majority of their 'students' across DECADES.
This has created the mainly underachieving, under-schooled, non-educated parts in the population that has been also denied the access to activities that would provide decent sustained incomes...
Like the man, a Bangladeshi one, who has been seen to be asking for money from passers-by on the Whitechapel Road... Those who know him also know his age and his history... He is known to spend the money on alcohol...
A more stark reality would be hard to imagine in the East End...
Why?
Because everyone knows that alcoholism is a road to self destruction... And the destruction of all around the person......
And everyone also knows that 'culturally, Bangladeshis are a million miles away from anything to do with alcohol'.
Or are they ?
And how could Bangladeshis get to be alcoholics in the East End of London? Or in any other part of London or the UK!!!
This is the question that is linked with our examination of the many ';benefits' that the pluggers of Crossrail hoe,attacks peddle....
They say that 'Crossrail would bring benefits to the East End'.
They don't mean benefits that are rationally described...
They mean distorted benefits. In fact they mean deficits that destroy the person. The community...
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole plot is also NO to ADDING NEW poverty to the East End of London....
AADHIKARonline is published 24/7 by the AADHIKAR Media Foundation in association with and in support of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail hole plot [as contained din ‘hybrid’ ‘Crossrail Bill’, a draft piece of legislation which has been crassly promoted by the Blair administration under the influence fo Big Business... That ‘Bill’ is now in the legislative UK House of Lords, where it is being allowed to pass the stages of scrutiny without scrutiny!][the plot, as contained in and typified by the ‘hybrid’ ‘Crossrail Bill’ now in the UK ‘legislative’ ‘House of Lords’ as the crassly conceived ‘Crossrail Bill’]
Editor©Muhammad Haque
1155 GMT Monday 2 June 2008
The 4th edition of the day 1155 MT Monday 2 June 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill; Khoodeelaar! the campaign in defence of the economic, social, human rights of the people in the East End of London and the campaign against the abuse of the public positions and the public resources by the seekers of or the occupants in the publicly paid for posts and positions in the name of the people of the East End of Lon don... Khoodeelaar! the No to 'Crossrail hole Bill' CAMPAIGN from the Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area
The KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business Crossrail hole agenda is also the campaign against creation of new poverty in the inner city East End of London.... More HERE shortly
LINES OF HUNGER FROM INNER CITY Blaired Britain - updating the 'Lines of Hunger from bangladesh' first written and published by Muhammad Haque in May 1991...... Updates have been rescheduled and will appear here in the week starting on Monday 2 June 2008
On Sunday 22 January 2006, at a Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN meeting held at the 'Brady Centre', 192 Hanbury Street, London E1, the KHOODEELAAR! campaign organiser gave the key note speech about the campaign. In the speech, he also stated, extempore, the core of a motion that the meeting unanimously supported DEMANDING that the local Tower Hamlets Council passed a full Council motion saying ‘No to the Crossrail hole Bill’.
Two years 4 months have passed since that time and the Khoodeelaar! campaign has been renewing the same demand to the Council. The Tower Hamlets Council has not passed that motion. The community has not been respected by Tower Hamlets Council on this issue. Yet the 'councillors' who attended that meeting have remained on the same Council claiming to represent the community that is affected by the Crossrail hole plot..... So what is the secret? Is it in any way to do with any ambiguity about what was said in the Khoodeelaar! campaign demand as passed by the meeting held on 22 january 2006? There could be no ambiguity. Just for the records, we again publish the main text of the KHOODEELAAR! legal action process service communication about the demand that was sent to the then 'chief executive' in the Tower Hamlets Borough COUNCIL , Christine Gilbert on 25 january 2006.
By©Muhammad Haque .....
Wednesday 25 January 2006
To
Christine Gilbert
Chief Executive
And
Owen Whalley
Head of Major Project Development
London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council
Mulberry Place
5 Clove Crescent
London E14 2BG
Dear Ms Gilbert and Mr Whalley
Subject Khoodeelaar campaign meeting –
Demand 22 January 2006 –
The texts [2] sent by fax 25 Jan 2006
1. You both have been sent this morning the main texts of the KHOODEELAAR!
campaign resolution as delivered and agreed at the meeting on 22 January 2006 held [at the Brady centre, 192 Hanbury street London E1] in the evening of Sunday 22 January 2006 demanding that the London borough of tower hamlets council pass a single motion as their resolution against the Crossrail hole plan/bill as it is in the uk house of commons now and that they do so in the next 11 days and that the resolution be put to the uk parliament and to the uk secretary of state transport department [Department for Transport= ‘DfT’] and that the resolution be phrased and drafted in an unambiguous unequivocal way accurately truthfully reflecting and representing the demand of the community.
2. Mr Owen Whalley has been sent the copy – and is being sent this further amplifier and clarifier – because of the central role he has been playing (as the published documents of the LBTH council suggest) in the promotion of the Crossrail hole scheme/project/bill as far as the ‘development’ of the Crossrail ‘project’ for the LBTH council goes. He has been sent the material also in order for him to be in receipt of what the community has demanded and what he as the designated employee on ‘Crossrail’ in the LBTH council has to do so that the community’s lawful and urgent demand is seen to be recognised and implemented by the relevant employees in the council on every relevant occasion.
3. As the same campaign meeting [22 January 2006] also agreed the taking of legal action in the event that tower hamlets council fail to implement the demand, you both are most certainly going to be included as parties in any such action and so you are being sent this in our voluntary compliance with the requirements of natural justice, due process [and other related concepts] and the civil procedure rules.
4. The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in defence of the BRICK LANE London E1 AREA and against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project/bill is able to confirm to you both today Wednesday 25 January 2006 that we shall include additional demands for the very detailed legal and democratic and economic accountability from the council over any additional costs that tower hamlets council is caused to be embroiled in or involved in or engaged in - whether in any further attempt/s on the parts of those who have access to the finances and the ‘powers’ and the contacts of the London borough of tower hamlets council to justify their roles and their promotions of the Crossrail hole project or in any further unreasonable, irresponsible, improper, undemocratic, antisocial and or ill-conceived egotistic bid/s in defiance of the very clearly expressed demands of the local community and or in defiance of the campaigning organisations representing the fears, needs and demands of the local community against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project/bill and you both shall be included in any list of witnesses who will be asked to give evidence on their own roles and the origins of any orders or decisions that caused them to play the parts that you found yourselves playing in defiance of the local community’s clear demand against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project Bill. 5. Ms Christine Gilbert has been put on notice since the first quarter of 2004 when the chair of the CBRUK organisation (which politically organised the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign during that same period in 2004) initiated the first series of extensive questions which were drafted and put to her concerning the role she had played in advising and or working with or in carrying out the actual intentions of any controlling group member of the LBTH council on the Crossrail hole scheme/project/scheme. She has failed to date to deal with those questions and despite two recent [final] reminders has continued to fail or refuse to answer the outstanding questions. She has also failed to provide any lawful or reasonable explanation or lawful justification for her conduct and role concerned in the context of the KHOODEELAAR campaign demands, questions and representations.
6. The statements that have been published in the past two weeks in the name of or by the uses and abuses of the LBTH council as the corporate entity and about the Crossrail hole bill have contained more than one contradictory assertion and allusion to alleged facts thus creating new grounds for the community to be able to claim that ‘the TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL’ in general and the identifiable ‘controlling group’ councillors are carrying on conducting themselves in defiance of or in conflict with the wishes and the interests of the local community concerned.
7. The KHOODEELAAR campaign is able to confirm to both ms Christine Gilbert and Mr Owen Whalley that this communication dated and transmitted on Wednesday 25 January 2006 is being made to both of them as a very last attempt at helping the controlling persons involved in the LBTH council over the Crossrail hole scheme/project/ bill avoid placing or pushing the corporate entity of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council and its resources in a very costly confrontation with the community in the East End
8. Mr Owen Whalley’s circular ‘to all members’ of the TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL dated 19 September 2005 contains a misleading statement that is of crucial relevance to us and which statement as put to the meeting of 22 January 2006 and was loudly and clearly rejected by the meeting. That statement is in the last sentence in paragraph two of the circular (‘the petition also makes explicit the council’s opposition to an intervention shaft in Hanbury Street and preference for its relocation to Woodseer Street’.)
9. The meaning of the phrase ‘misleading statement’ in this context is any statement that contradicts the community’s opposition to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail hole, to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail shaft tunnel, to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail hole in THE BRICK LANE London E1 AREA and in any other part of THE London BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS. This is the position as expressed by the public meeting in support of the Khoodeelaar campaign held at the Brady centre on Sunday 22 January 2006. This takes into account the KHOODEELAAR CAMPAIGN'S remit which recognises the rights of the people in the Mile End area that is also affected by the known Crossrail plans.
10. The KHOODEELAAR campaign is able to confirm that it will treat this document and communication [25 January 2006] as being a reasonable final comprehensive advice, notice and representation to the two most relevant employees in the LBTH council of the community’s simple and straightforward demand and position on the role of the LBTH Council in the matter of the Crossrail hole project/scheme/ Bill and of the task that the community has asked the LBTH Council to carry out within the specified time by passing the resolution and then making the same resolution available to the MPs select committee currently sitting to formally consider the relevant aspects of the Crossrail hole Bill [‘the Crossrail Bill’ or the ‘Crossrail hybrid Bill’] in time so that there is no frustration of the community’s wish in the remainder of the process of legislation involved.
KHOODEELAAR campaign demand 22 January 2006 and follow-up legal notice to Christine Gilbert and Owen Whalley concluded at 1436 HRS GMT on Wednesday 25 January 2006
AADHIKARonline campaign news commentary against Crossrail hole agenda...1510 Hrs GMT 1610 Hrs UK Time London Friday 30 May 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot UPDATE on Friday 30 May 2008 shows up the charade that is the UK Houses of Parliament..... As seen in the willing servility to the executive as exhibited in the behaviour of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ ‘select committee ‘ fronted by the place man Alan Meale and his ‘opposition’ [what ‘opposition’] place men and place women .... As Khoodeelaar! had predicted in December 2005, within hours of the announcement being made that a ‘select committee’ had been set up, there was no chance in a million years that the ‘select committee’ would allow the evidence against Crossrail to be put on the record before the committee. As we also correctly predicted, the ‘ Crossrail Bill’ ‘select committee’ in the UK House of Commons that had just been announced [December 2005] would behave like a stooge committee. As it in fact did. And we then predicted, in November 2007 when we first became directly involved in communications wit the part of the ‘House of Lords’ concerned with the ‘Crossrail Bill’] that UNLESS some members of the ‘House of Lords’ [what an affront to all of us who do not consider any human being to be worthy of being called a lord!] showed by their conduct that they UNDERSTOOD what the duties of a constitutionally active legislative Upper chamber of a democratic and accountable Parliament had to do and UNLESS they did accordingly and constitutionally and unless they behaved in manifestly honest, intellectually competent, ethically transparent, objectively independent way,,, they would discredit the ‘case for the House of Lords’... We went on to give them support, encouragement and advice... We did so in our direct communications as addressed to the bureaucracy set up ‘ within the House of Lords’ for the purpose of ‘the formal treatment of the Crossrail Bill’. As we did in published comments including in those carried in particular on the Times newspaper web site.... And we did so for the simple purpose of backing the movement for democracy in the UK, the movement for accountability in and via Parliament to the people, and in the particular case on the CRASSLY conceived, Big Business-agenda Crossrail scam. And we called for an end to the wasteful plot via Crossrail that was just afoot.... in the ‘Upper House’, ‘ via’ the ‘Upper House’..... We also examined the history of the ‘House of Lords’.. and we referred to Oliver Cromwell... and said that so dire, so empty, so barren has been the field of formally instituted opposition in and via parliament in britain that we looked in vain over records of centuries to find any significant acton that was taken to bring the illegitimate elements that made up the ‘House of Lords’ to book.... as it were... We did all of this in order to tell the servile time servers that we were NOT impressed by their records generally and that unless they showed they were willing to tell the truth about the people’s serious objections against Crossrail they, the ‘House of Lords’ members concerned would go down as contributing yet more to discredit the already largely illegitimate and discredited ‘House’.. And so they have done..... [To be continued]
AADHIKARonline bringing the Muhammad Haque daily commentary on the poverty of Blaired Britain now fronted b y Gordon Brown; and focussing this weekend on the extravagant poverty of David Cameron and his colluders who are insulting the remaining intelligence of the people in the UK........Ca-monroin evidently is operating on the assumption that the Tory violence by poverty creation and poverty-perpetration is all acceptable now... and that with the likes of Frank the Benefit Fraudsters from Merseyside die [who is being given obscene accolades, in fact for his role in undermining Gordon Brown’s tottering reputation...] ... The facts must be separated daily from the lies that Thatcher’s revivalist gang led by Ca-Moron is going to make legitimate and acceptable..... The agenda that Crossrail hole plot is part of is the same agenda that Margaret Thatcher, Norman Tebbit, Tony Blair have supported and operated and the agenda that Gordon Brown was lured by Ken Livingstone into backing in a brazenly imprudent way in September/October 2007..... And the agenda that is being revived by Ca-Moron conservatives who are faking it... as they dress up as caring, concerned conservatives... They are nothing the sort... They care only for their opportunity to get into power and smash society to bits... society that Thatcher violated and society that Thatcher was smashing up when she was given the farewell........ That agenda is bad for the people in the inner cities... That agenda is bad for the people elsewhere in the uK..... Opposing the thinking behind that agenda is the first task.... Read more here daily
View HERE the latest Muhammad Haque daily commentary on the Gordon Brown-fronted Blaired regime in the UK ...
Also the latest KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘Crossrail hole plot’ CAMPAIGN news and constitutional law analyses are accessible via this web site. This site carries the updates and summaries on the Khoodeelaar! Constitutional Law Opposition to the Î hybrid and the Big Business-prompted "Crossrail Bill" which is now [at 25 May 2008] being given the formal and the illegitimate and the unconstitutional seal of approval by the stooged and the staged and the undemocratic, the unaccountable, the unethically-controlled and the illegitimate agenda-seeking ‘Select Committee’ set up in UK legislative House of Lords under the actual influence and for the benefit [=profit to the tunes of £Billions of money that would be forced out of the UK public] of Big Business influences, elements, agencies, lobbys represented by the front-line Military Industrial Complex operations as typified by the USA conglomerate Bechtel....
KHOODEELAAR! commentary on Crossrail hole plot-peddling Chris Grayling’s latest pack of lies against the people pushed into poverty in the UK - we show up the crassness of Crossrail hole-plot-backer Chris Grayling in a series of comments due to start today Tuesday 27 May 2008
By©Muhammad Haque
1454 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 28 May 2008
What is the evidence that justifies the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council DESCRIBING the controlling clique as corrupt?
There is not just one piece of evidence. There are countless items of evidence. The sum of the evidence both shows that the clique is engaged in wrong conduct about Crossrail. And that it is also engaged in wrong conduct about the overall, the general duties it has towards the people in the Borough of Tower Hamlets about other aspects of life that relate to the duties of a local council.
One of the persistent patterns of the lying behaviour by the corrupt clique on the Tower Hamlets 'locally elected' [!!!!!!!] Council has been their refusal to observe basic standards of ethics and behaviour. Ethics and standards of behaviour that on paper any 'locally elected council' 'administration' would be expected to practise and respect.
And how deep, complete, has been the evidence of the Tower Hamlets Council’s wrong and wrongful behaviour?
As deep as the numbers of years over which the clique has been in control. As deep as the particulars and as extensive as the details of the claque’s collusion with Big Business proponents who have got in league with the Tower ~Hamlets Council with the aim of taking over the land and the spaces in the East End of London under covers of plausible projects but in reality for the benefit of Big Business And to benefit the City of London-linked exploiters at the expense of the people of the East End of London the ordinary population in the borough in the end.
This is seen in the dishonest behaviour of the clique that was fronted by Christine Gilbert at the time.
Gilbert as chief executive in the Council made a most untrue assertion about the actual policy of the clique on Crossrail.
This concerned the so-called cabinet meeting of 6 October 2004.
The Khoodeelaar! campaign observed the meeting and it was clear that the community’s serious opposition to the Council’s collusion with the Crossrail scam [it was not a Bill in Parliament yet - that took place nearly 4 months later] was being sidelined by the clique.
So the Khoodeelaar! campaign organised for the relevant aspect of the community's questions to be put to Christine Gilbert in the context of the clique's conduct.
It was never expected that Gilbert would come out with an admission that her clique was in the wrong. Or that the clique had let the community down.
But it was essential for the purpose of extensive evidential processing of her conduct that she was given the opportunity to come clean and admit that her clique had indeed been in the wrong.
Regardless of the actual final position Gilbert would take on the subject under reference, it was expected that she should show normal courtesy and behave in accordance with the rules that require the ‘chief officer’ of the local council to properly and timely acknowledge communications she received.
What did Gilbert do?
Did she behave in accordance with the standards expected of the town clerk?
She behaved with undue delay.
She pretended that she had not received the communications containing the questions.
Was that exceptional?
The answer, on the facts, is that NO.
CHRISTINE Gilbert behaved with the same prejudice and with the same lack of accountability towards the whole population in Tower Hamlets that had been the feature of the Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique for decades.
That is why the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has had to establish new criteria so that the history of neglect as shown by the ‘elected’ local council to the people in whose name the council is ‘elected’ is not repeated. That the people are offered accountable representation by the ‘elected’ council.
That was the only way in which the community’s interests could be defended.
That was the only way that the Crossrail hole attacks could be stopped.
Christine Gilbert behaved with no regard for the constitutional duties of the local Council. She behaved opportunistically and on the assumption that there would no ‘issue made on the floor of the council’ by any of the ‘elected members on the 'Tower Hamlets Council'’.
She showed no recognition of the fact that her conduct, her role and the implications of her conduct and of her role could indeed be challenged in court.
Or did she think that the Khoodeelaar! campaign notes to her and to her clique saying that a time would come when their abuse of power and their collusion with the agenda of the Big Business would be challenged in court was not part of the real programme of action ?
How similar was Christine Gilbert’s disrespect to the ordinary codes of ethical, unaccountable behaviour to the disrespect shown to ethics, morality and the norms of constitutionality by the bureaucracy set up in the name of the ‘House of Lords’ that has been in fact peddling the Crossrail hole plotting agenda desired by Big Business, a la Bechtel of USA ? [To be continued]
AADHIKAR Media Foundation, a wholly non-profit, non-commercial media service that is publishing the KHOODEELAAR! campaign and information materials on the internet for the advancement of understanding in the cause eo f establishing human rights by economic and social justice in the UK inner city areas and for the dissemination of the lessons learnt in the struggles against Big Business and their stooged regimes that Blairing typifies.... The apparent dissemination of the Gordon Brown fronted Blaired regime in the UK is not to be confused with the overdue disintegration of the corrupt and the undemocratic 'system'... By the looks of things at 0830 "system" GMT in London on [Bank holiday] 26 May 2008, David "Ca-Moron" has NOT been given the actual go-ahead to proclaim that he is already 'home and dry' [Electorally speaking] as the next manager of the Capitalist Imperialist enterprise in and via the UK ... Ca-Moron is being understandably reserved in showing any discernible signs of confidence[in public at any rate] . The real Powers that be are yet to see show reliable they find Ca-Moron to carry on the BUSINESS of running the undemocratic enterprise that denies, deprives and destitute groups and sections of the population in the UK and via the UK in many parts of the world not least in Asia and Africa .... are giving Gordon Brown a mere few weeks in which to stage yet another stunt....so they can decide whether to let him carry on or be asked to give way to their 'more suitable nominee to replace him in the fronting of the remainder of the brand Blaired....... Then they will open the way for the propaganda onslaught making BRAND Ca-MORON LOOK as the 'new' [!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!] project......to continue with the corrupt status quo... then they will stage the various bogus challenges to Gordon Brown or they will unleash the various reserved slip-ups in his administration that will draw undue attention to Gordon Brown's, by then, heightened level of incompetence... Heightened in the propaganda that is WATCH THIS AADHIKARonline SPACE.....
Editor©Muhammad Haque
1155 GMT Monday 2 June 2008
The 4th edition of the day 1155 MT Monday 2 June 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill; Khoodeelaar! the campaign in defence of the economic, social, human rights of the people in the East End of London and the campaign against the abuse of the public positions and the public resources by the seekers of or the occupants in the publicly paid for posts and positions in the name of the people of the East End of Lon don... Khoodeelaar! the No to 'Crossrail hole Bill' CAMPAIGN from the Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area
The KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business Crossrail hole agenda is also the campaign against creation of new poverty in the inner city East End of London.... More HERE shortly
LINES OF HUNGER FROM INNER CITY Blaired Britain - updating the 'Lines of Hunger from bangladesh' first written and published by Muhammad Haque in May 1991...... Updates have been rescheduled and will appear here in the week starting on Monday 2 June 2008
On Sunday 22 January 2006, at a Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN meeting held at the 'Brady Centre', 192 Hanbury Street, London E1, the KHOODEELAAR! campaign organiser gave the key note speech about the campaign. In the speech, he also stated, extempore, the core of a motion that the meeting unanimously supported DEMANDING that the local Tower Hamlets Council passed a full Council motion saying ‘No to the Crossrail hole Bill’.
Two years 4 months have passed since that time and the Khoodeelaar! campaign has been renewing the same demand to the Council. The Tower Hamlets Council has not passed that motion. The community has not been respected by Tower Hamlets Council on this issue. Yet the 'councillors' who attended that meeting have remained on the same Council claiming to represent the community that is affected by the Crossrail hole plot..... So what is the secret? Is it in any way to do with any ambiguity about what was said in the Khoodeelaar! campaign demand as passed by the meeting held on 22 january 2006? There could be no ambiguity. Just for the records, we again publish the main text of the KHOODEELAAR! legal action process service communication about the demand that was sent to the then 'chief executive' in the Tower Hamlets Borough COUNCIL , Christine Gilbert on 25 january 2006.
By©Muhammad Haque .....
Wednesday 25 January 2006
To
Christine Gilbert
Chief Executive
And
Owen Whalley
Head of Major Project Development
London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council
Mulberry Place
5 Clove Crescent
London E14 2BG
Dear Ms Gilbert and Mr Whalley
Subject Khoodeelaar campaign meeting –
Demand 22 January 2006 –
The texts [2] sent by fax 25 Jan 2006
1. You both have been sent this morning the main texts of the KHOODEELAAR!
campaign resolution as delivered and agreed at the meeting on 22 January 2006 held [at the Brady centre, 192 Hanbury street London E1] in the evening of Sunday 22 January 2006 demanding that the London borough of tower hamlets council pass a single motion as their resolution against the Crossrail hole plan/bill as it is in the uk house of commons now and that they do so in the next 11 days and that the resolution be put to the uk parliament and to the uk secretary of state transport department [Department for Transport= ‘DfT’] and that the resolution be phrased and drafted in an unambiguous unequivocal way accurately truthfully reflecting and representing the demand of the community.
2. Mr Owen Whalley has been sent the copy – and is being sent this further amplifier and clarifier – because of the central role he has been playing (as the published documents of the LBTH council suggest) in the promotion of the Crossrail hole scheme/project/bill as far as the ‘development’ of the Crossrail ‘project’ for the LBTH council goes. He has been sent the material also in order for him to be in receipt of what the community has demanded and what he as the designated employee on ‘Crossrail’ in the LBTH council has to do so that the community’s lawful and urgent demand is seen to be recognised and implemented by the relevant employees in the council on every relevant occasion.
3. As the same campaign meeting [22 January 2006] also agreed the taking of legal action in the event that tower hamlets council fail to implement the demand, you both are most certainly going to be included as parties in any such action and so you are being sent this in our voluntary compliance with the requirements of natural justice, due process [and other related concepts] and the civil procedure rules.
4. The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in defence of the BRICK LANE London E1 AREA and against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project/bill is able to confirm to you both today Wednesday 25 January 2006 that we shall include additional demands for the very detailed legal and democratic and economic accountability from the council over any additional costs that tower hamlets council is caused to be embroiled in or involved in or engaged in - whether in any further attempt/s on the parts of those who have access to the finances and the ‘powers’ and the contacts of the London borough of tower hamlets council to justify their roles and their promotions of the Crossrail hole project or in any further unreasonable, irresponsible, improper, undemocratic, antisocial and or ill-conceived egotistic bid/s in defiance of the very clearly expressed demands of the local community and or in defiance of the campaigning organisations representing the fears, needs and demands of the local community against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project/bill and you both shall be included in any list of witnesses who will be asked to give evidence on their own roles and the origins of any orders or decisions that caused them to play the parts that you found yourselves playing in defiance of the local community’s clear demand against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project Bill. 5. Ms Christine Gilbert has been put on notice since the first quarter of 2004 when the chair of the CBRUK organisation (which politically organised the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign during that same period in 2004) initiated the first series of extensive questions which were drafted and put to her concerning the role she had played in advising and or working with or in carrying out the actual intentions of any controlling group member of the LBTH council on the Crossrail hole scheme/project/scheme. She has failed to date to deal with those questions and despite two recent [final] reminders has continued to fail or refuse to answer the outstanding questions. She has also failed to provide any lawful or reasonable explanation or lawful justification for her conduct and role concerned in the context of the KHOODEELAAR campaign demands, questions and representations.
6. The statements that have been published in the past two weeks in the name of or by the uses and abuses of the LBTH council as the corporate entity and about the Crossrail hole bill have contained more than one contradictory assertion and allusion to alleged facts thus creating new grounds for the community to be able to claim that ‘the TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL’ in general and the identifiable ‘controlling group’ councillors are carrying on conducting themselves in defiance of or in conflict with the wishes and the interests of the local community concerned.
7. The KHOODEELAAR campaign is able to confirm to both ms Christine Gilbert and Mr Owen Whalley that this communication dated and transmitted on Wednesday 25 January 2006 is being made to both of them as a very last attempt at helping the controlling persons involved in the LBTH council over the Crossrail hole scheme/project/ bill avoid placing or pushing the corporate entity of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council and its resources in a very costly confrontation with the community in the East End
8. Mr Owen Whalley’s circular ‘to all members’ of the TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL dated 19 September 2005 contains a misleading statement that is of crucial relevance to us and which statement as put to the meeting of 22 January 2006 and was loudly and clearly rejected by the meeting. That statement is in the last sentence in paragraph two of the circular (‘the petition also makes explicit the council’s opposition to an intervention shaft in Hanbury Street and preference for its relocation to Woodseer Street’.)
9. The meaning of the phrase ‘misleading statement’ in this context is any statement that contradicts the community’s opposition to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail hole, to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail shaft tunnel, to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail hole in THE BRICK LANE London E1 AREA and in any other part of THE London BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS. This is the position as expressed by the public meeting in support of the Khoodeelaar campaign held at the Brady centre on Sunday 22 January 2006. This takes into account the KHOODEELAAR CAMPAIGN'S remit which recognises the rights of the people in the Mile End area that is also affected by the known Crossrail plans.
10. The KHOODEELAAR campaign is able to confirm that it will treat this document and communication [25 January 2006] as being a reasonable final comprehensive advice, notice and representation to the two most relevant employees in the LBTH council of the community’s simple and straightforward demand and position on the role of the LBTH Council in the matter of the Crossrail hole project/scheme/ Bill and of the task that the community has asked the LBTH Council to carry out within the specified time by passing the resolution and then making the same resolution available to the MPs select committee currently sitting to formally consider the relevant aspects of the Crossrail hole Bill [‘the Crossrail Bill’ or the ‘Crossrail hybrid Bill’] in time so that there is no frustration of the community’s wish in the remainder of the process of legislation involved.
KHOODEELAAR campaign demand 22 January 2006 and follow-up legal notice to Christine Gilbert and Owen Whalley concluded at 1436 HRS GMT on Wednesday 25 January 2006
AADHIKARonline campaign news commentary against Crossrail hole agenda...1510 Hrs GMT 1610 Hrs UK Time London Friday 30 May 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot UPDATE on Friday 30 May 2008 shows up the charade that is the UK Houses of Parliament..... As seen in the willing servility to the executive as exhibited in the behaviour of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ ‘select committee ‘ fronted by the place man Alan Meale and his ‘opposition’ [what ‘opposition’] place men and place women .... As Khoodeelaar! had predicted in December 2005, within hours of the announcement being made that a ‘select committee’ had been set up, there was no chance in a million years that the ‘select committee’ would allow the evidence against Crossrail to be put on the record before the committee. As we also correctly predicted, the ‘ Crossrail Bill’ ‘select committee’ in the UK House of Commons that had just been announced [December 2005] would behave like a stooge committee. As it in fact did. And we then predicted, in November 2007 when we first became directly involved in communications wit the part of the ‘House of Lords’ concerned with the ‘Crossrail Bill’] that UNLESS some members of the ‘House of Lords’ [what an affront to all of us who do not consider any human being to be worthy of being called a lord!] showed by their conduct that they UNDERSTOOD what the duties of a constitutionally active legislative Upper chamber of a democratic and accountable Parliament had to do and UNLESS they did accordingly and constitutionally and unless they behaved in manifestly honest, intellectually competent, ethically transparent, objectively independent way,,, they would discredit the ‘case for the House of Lords’... We went on to give them support, encouragement and advice... We did so in our direct communications as addressed to the bureaucracy set up ‘ within the House of Lords’ for the purpose of ‘the formal treatment of the Crossrail Bill’. As we did in published comments including in those carried in particular on the Times newspaper web site.... And we did so for the simple purpose of backing the movement for democracy in the UK, the movement for accountability in and via Parliament to the people, and in the particular case on the CRASSLY conceived, Big Business-agenda Crossrail scam. And we called for an end to the wasteful plot via Crossrail that was just afoot.... in the ‘Upper House’, ‘ via’ the ‘Upper House’..... We also examined the history of the ‘House of Lords’.. and we referred to Oliver Cromwell... and said that so dire, so empty, so barren has been the field of formally instituted opposition in and via parliament in britain that we looked in vain over records of centuries to find any significant acton that was taken to bring the illegitimate elements that made up the ‘House of Lords’ to book.... as it were... We did all of this in order to tell the servile time servers that we were NOT impressed by their records generally and that unless they showed they were willing to tell the truth about the people’s serious objections against Crossrail they, the ‘House of Lords’ members concerned would go down as contributing yet more to discredit the already largely illegitimate and discredited ‘House’.. And so they have done..... [To be continued]
AADHIKARonline bringing the Muhammad Haque daily commentary on the poverty of Blaired Britain now fronted b y Gordon Brown; and focussing this weekend on the extravagant poverty of David Cameron and his colluders who are insulting the remaining intelligence of the people in the UK........Ca-monroin evidently is operating on the assumption that the Tory violence by poverty creation and poverty-perpetration is all acceptable now... and that with the likes of Frank the Benefit Fraudsters from Merseyside die [who is being given obscene accolades, in fact for his role in undermining Gordon Brown’s tottering reputation...] ... The facts must be separated daily from the lies that Thatcher’s revivalist gang led by Ca-Moron is going to make legitimate and acceptable..... The agenda that Crossrail hole plot is part of is the same agenda that Margaret Thatcher, Norman Tebbit, Tony Blair have supported and operated and the agenda that Gordon Brown was lured by Ken Livingstone into backing in a brazenly imprudent way in September/October 2007..... And the agenda that is being revived by Ca-Moron conservatives who are faking it... as they dress up as caring, concerned conservatives... They are nothing the sort... They care only for their opportunity to get into power and smash society to bits... society that Thatcher violated and society that Thatcher was smashing up when she was given the farewell........ That agenda is bad for the people in the inner cities... That agenda is bad for the people elsewhere in the uK..... Opposing the thinking behind that agenda is the first task.... Read more here daily
View HERE the latest Muhammad Haque daily commentary on the Gordon Brown-fronted Blaired regime in the UK ...
Also the latest KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘Crossrail hole plot’ CAMPAIGN news and constitutional law analyses are accessible via this web site. This site carries the updates and summaries on the Khoodeelaar! Constitutional Law Opposition to the Î hybrid and the Big Business-prompted "Crossrail Bill" which is now [at 25 May 2008] being given the formal and the illegitimate and the unconstitutional seal of approval by the stooged and the staged and the undemocratic, the unaccountable, the unethically-controlled and the illegitimate agenda-seeking ‘Select Committee’ set up in UK legislative House of Lords under the actual influence and for the benefit [=profit to the tunes of £Billions of money that would be forced out of the UK public] of Big Business influences, elements, agencies, lobbys represented by the front-line Military Industrial Complex operations as typified by the USA conglomerate Bechtel....
KHOODEELAAR! commentary on Crossrail hole plot-peddling Chris Grayling’s latest pack of lies against the people pushed into poverty in the UK - we show up the crassness of Crossrail hole-plot-backer Chris Grayling in a series of comments due to start today Tuesday 27 May 2008
By©Muhammad Haque
1454 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 28 May 2008
What is the evidence that justifies the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council DESCRIBING the controlling clique as corrupt?
There is not just one piece of evidence. There are countless items of evidence. The sum of the evidence both shows that the clique is engaged in wrong conduct about Crossrail. And that it is also engaged in wrong conduct about the overall, the general duties it has towards the people in the Borough of Tower Hamlets about other aspects of life that relate to the duties of a local council.
One of the persistent patterns of the lying behaviour by the corrupt clique on the Tower Hamlets 'locally elected' [!!!!!!!] Council has been their refusal to observe basic standards of ethics and behaviour. Ethics and standards of behaviour that on paper any 'locally elected council' 'administration' would be expected to practise and respect.
And how deep, complete, has been the evidence of the Tower Hamlets Council’s wrong and wrongful behaviour?
As deep as the numbers of years over which the clique has been in control. As deep as the particulars and as extensive as the details of the claque’s collusion with Big Business proponents who have got in league with the Tower ~Hamlets Council with the aim of taking over the land and the spaces in the East End of London under covers of plausible projects but in reality for the benefit of Big Business And to benefit the City of London-linked exploiters at the expense of the people of the East End of London the ordinary population in the borough in the end.
This is seen in the dishonest behaviour of the clique that was fronted by Christine Gilbert at the time.
Gilbert as chief executive in the Council made a most untrue assertion about the actual policy of the clique on Crossrail.
This concerned the so-called cabinet meeting of 6 October 2004.
The Khoodeelaar! campaign observed the meeting and it was clear that the community’s serious opposition to the Council’s collusion with the Crossrail scam [it was not a Bill in Parliament yet - that took place nearly 4 months later] was being sidelined by the clique.
So the Khoodeelaar! campaign organised for the relevant aspect of the community's questions to be put to Christine Gilbert in the context of the clique's conduct.
It was never expected that Gilbert would come out with an admission that her clique was in the wrong. Or that the clique had let the community down.
But it was essential for the purpose of extensive evidential processing of her conduct that she was given the opportunity to come clean and admit that her clique had indeed been in the wrong.
Regardless of the actual final position Gilbert would take on the subject under reference, it was expected that she should show normal courtesy and behave in accordance with the rules that require the ‘chief officer’ of the local council to properly and timely acknowledge communications she received.
What did Gilbert do?
Did she behave in accordance with the standards expected of the town clerk?
She behaved with undue delay.
She pretended that she had not received the communications containing the questions.
Was that exceptional?
The answer, on the facts, is that NO.
CHRISTINE Gilbert behaved with the same prejudice and with the same lack of accountability towards the whole population in Tower Hamlets that had been the feature of the Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique for decades.
That is why the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has had to establish new criteria so that the history of neglect as shown by the ‘elected’ local council to the people in whose name the council is ‘elected’ is not repeated. That the people are offered accountable representation by the ‘elected’ council.
That was the only way in which the community’s interests could be defended.
That was the only way that the Crossrail hole attacks could be stopped.
Christine Gilbert behaved with no regard for the constitutional duties of the local Council. She behaved opportunistically and on the assumption that there would no ‘issue made on the floor of the council’ by any of the ‘elected members on the 'Tower Hamlets Council'’.
She showed no recognition of the fact that her conduct, her role and the implications of her conduct and of her role could indeed be challenged in court.
Or did she think that the Khoodeelaar! campaign notes to her and to her clique saying that a time would come when their abuse of power and their collusion with the agenda of the Big Business would be challenged in court was not part of the real programme of action ?
How similar was Christine Gilbert’s disrespect to the ordinary codes of ethical, unaccountable behaviour to the disrespect shown to ethics, morality and the norms of constitutionality by the bureaucracy set up in the name of the ‘House of Lords’ that has been in fact peddling the Crossrail hole plotting agenda desired by Big Business, a la Bechtel of USA ? [To be continued]
AADHIKAR Media Foundation, a wholly non-profit, non-commercial media service that is publishing the KHOODEELAAR! campaign and information materials on the internet for the advancement of understanding in the cause eo f establishing human rights by economic and social justice in the UK inner city areas and for the dissemination of the lessons learnt in the struggles against Big Business and their stooged regimes that Blairing typifies.... The apparent dissemination of the Gordon Brown fronted Blaired regime in the UK is not to be confused with the overdue disintegration of the corrupt and the undemocratic 'system'... By the looks of things at 0830 "system" GMT in London on [Bank holiday] 26 May 2008, David "Ca-Moron" has NOT been given the actual go-ahead to proclaim that he is already 'home and dry' [Electorally speaking] as the next manager of the Capitalist Imperialist enterprise in and via the UK ... Ca-Moron is being understandably reserved in showing any discernible signs of confidence[in public at any rate] . The real Powers that be are yet to see show reliable they find Ca-Moron to carry on the BUSINESS of running the undemocratic enterprise that denies, deprives and destitute groups and sections of the population in the UK and via the UK in many parts of the world not least in Asia and Africa .... are giving Gordon Brown a mere few weeks in which to stage yet another stunt....so they can decide whether to let him carry on or be asked to give way to their 'more suitable nominee to replace him in the fronting of the remainder of the brand Blaired....... Then they will open the way for the propaganda onslaught making BRAND Ca-MORON LOOK as the 'new' [!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!] project......to continue with the corrupt status quo... then they will stage the various bogus challenges to Gordon Brown or they will unleash the various reserved slip-ups in his administration that will draw undue attention to Gordon Brown's, by then, heightened level of incompetence... Heightened in the propaganda that is WATCH THIS AADHIKARonline SPACE.....
Sunday, June 1, 2008
The KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law campaign against Crossrail hole plot EVIDENCE shows that the UK Tories are untrustworthy, dishonest ..Worse
1940 Hrs GMT
2040 Hrs UK Time
London Sunday 1 June 2008
Khoodeelaar! no to Crossrail hole campaign ACTION UPDATE on the official Opposition over CROSSRAIL hole in the UK House of Commons...
This ACTION UPDATE is focussing on the role of the official opposition party in the UK House of Commons. The Conservative Party.
The party is known as the Tory party.
This refers to the interview cum exchange that took place between the then Tory party Chair Francis Maude and the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against Crossrail hole Bill organiser Muhammad Haque.
The date was 24 April 2006.
The Place Brick Lane. London E1 UK
This update will set out the basic facts first and then raise the questions about the Tories’ claim that they are more reliable than the Blaired party. or that they are more competent than the battered Blaired image of Gordon Brown, the incumbent tenant at No 10 Downing Street Lon don SW1 UK.
The Khoodeelaar! examination of the Tories record shows that the Tories are NOT any more trustworthy than the Blaired Party [the former Labour Party].
In fact, we shall show the Tories’ main spokesman Chris Grayling to be unreliable, shallow, dishonest and on the subject of his brief a lethally ignorant man.
The fact that Ca-Moron has appointed Grayling to be his Party’s frontman in the UK House of commons about the so-called state welfare ‘reform’ [!!!!] shows the fundamental stupidity of the Ca-Moron party. Or of ‘Team ca-Moron’ , to use a contemporary formulation
[To be continued]
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! reminding Francis Maude of the promise he had made in Brick Lane in April 2006 to oppose Crossrail hole Bill...
Francis Maude, then Tory Party Chair, made a statement to KHOODEELAAR! in Brick Lane on 24 April 2006.
The statement was that the Tory MP colleagues of Maude’s would arise the question of the Crossrail hole in the UK House of Commons soon after that date.
Although Maude did not name him, Chris Grayling was the Tory MP that was fronting the Tories’ brief on Crossrail at the time.
Despite waiting for Grating to make the promised anti-'Crossrail hole Bill move in Parliament, Khoodeelaar! observes that the Tories have not done any comment about the Crossrail hole.
Yet Maude’s own comment to Khoodeelaar! was quite unambiguous and critical of Alistair darling, the Blair Crossrail hole Bill Minister at the time. Maude clearly implied that Alistair Darling could not be trusted on anything he said.
So prepared was Maude to make critical remarks about Alistair darling that he did jot even wait for Khoodeelaar! organiser Muhammad Haque to finish HIS [Muhammad Haque] own statements or questions before he {Maude] jumped on the name of Alistair darling.....
May be that apparent speed had something to do with the fact that Maude had been given at least a full hour’s advance notice by Khoodeelaar! of what the question would be... the one hour before Maude actually came faced to face with the Khoodeelaar! organiser asking him the questions ...... That hour had been spent by the Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser speaking to one of the then Tory candidates for election to Tower Hamlets Council.
That candidate did not get elected [in the May 2006 election that followed]. But he was very much communicative on that occasion ands came across as being quite genuinely interested to learn from Khoodeelaar! what the pressing issues were that the community was execsied about ....
[To be continued]
2040 Hrs UK Time
London Sunday 1 June 2008
Khoodeelaar! no to Crossrail hole campaign ACTION UPDATE on the official Opposition over CROSSRAIL hole in the UK House of Commons...
This ACTION UPDATE is focussing on the role of the official opposition party in the UK House of Commons. The Conservative Party.
The party is known as the Tory party.
This refers to the interview cum exchange that took place between the then Tory party Chair Francis Maude and the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against Crossrail hole Bill organiser Muhammad Haque.
The date was 24 April 2006.
The Place Brick Lane. London E1 UK
This update will set out the basic facts first and then raise the questions about the Tories’ claim that they are more reliable than the Blaired party. or that they are more competent than the battered Blaired image of Gordon Brown, the incumbent tenant at No 10 Downing Street Lon don SW1 UK.
The Khoodeelaar! examination of the Tories record shows that the Tories are NOT any more trustworthy than the Blaired Party [the former Labour Party].
In fact, we shall show the Tories’ main spokesman Chris Grayling to be unreliable, shallow, dishonest and on the subject of his brief a lethally ignorant man.
The fact that Ca-Moron has appointed Grayling to be his Party’s frontman in the UK House of commons about the so-called state welfare ‘reform’ [!!!!] shows the fundamental stupidity of the Ca-Moron party. Or of ‘Team ca-Moron’ , to use a contemporary formulation
[To be continued]
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! reminding Francis Maude of the promise he had made in Brick Lane in April 2006 to oppose Crossrail hole Bill...
Francis Maude, then Tory Party Chair, made a statement to KHOODEELAAR! in Brick Lane on 24 April 2006.
The statement was that the Tory MP colleagues of Maude’s would arise the question of the Crossrail hole in the UK House of Commons soon after that date.
Although Maude did not name him, Chris Grayling was the Tory MP that was fronting the Tories’ brief on Crossrail at the time.
Despite waiting for Grating to make the promised anti-'Crossrail hole Bill move in Parliament, Khoodeelaar! observes that the Tories have not done any comment about the Crossrail hole.
Yet Maude’s own comment to Khoodeelaar! was quite unambiguous and critical of Alistair darling, the Blair Crossrail hole Bill Minister at the time. Maude clearly implied that Alistair Darling could not be trusted on anything he said.
So prepared was Maude to make critical remarks about Alistair darling that he did jot even wait for Khoodeelaar! organiser Muhammad Haque to finish HIS [Muhammad Haque] own statements or questions before he {Maude] jumped on the name of Alistair darling.....
May be that apparent speed had something to do with the fact that Maude had been given at least a full hour’s advance notice by Khoodeelaar! of what the question would be... the one hour before Maude actually came faced to face with the Khoodeelaar! organiser asking him the questions ...... That hour had been spent by the Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser speaking to one of the then Tory candidates for election to Tower Hamlets Council.
That candidate did not get elected [in the May 2006 election that followed]. But he was very much communicative on that occasion ands came across as being quite genuinely interested to learn from Khoodeelaar! what the pressing issues were that the community was execsied about ....
[To be continued]
Evidence of impeccable constitutionality in the Khoodeelaar! campaign of opposition to Big Business Crossrail hole plot stooges in UK 'House of Lords’
By©Muhammad Haque
1325 Hrs GMT
1425 Hrs UKTime
London Sunday 1 June 2008
We have been commenting for the past five days on and exposing the packaged lies for CROSSRAIL as contained in and represented by the ‘First Report’ published allegedly on 27 May 2008 in the name of the UK legislative House of Lords ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’.
the lies are for making the ‘proceedings’ referred to as being legitimate, genuine and truthful. the fact and the evidence are that the proceedings were a sham. Just as the equivalent proceedings as performed via the ‘House of Commons’ ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ during the two years [2005-2007] had been.
So why is KHOODEELAAR! bothering to pay so much attention to the lies as told via the ‘House of Lords’ by the Big Business Crossrail hole agenda promoters?
The answer is that because the lies are going to remain on the record and the record must be put right. Our publishing the particular expose will put on the public domain the actual facts and the truth can thereby be accessed.
Also the length of time that Khoodeelaar! has been spending in addressing every relevant aspect of the behaviour of the ‘legislative’ ‘UK House of Lords’ ‘Crossrail Bill’ ‘Select Committee’ in the context of our campaign to oppose the Crossrail hole plot has been significant. Our time, our resources and our specialist knowledge are being continued to be given to further the caused of the community’s rights. the community’s collective defence against the unconstitutional, immoral, unwanted attack on our community.
In particular, we are showing that we had ANTICIPATED that Parliament would be used as a barrier to our representation. We evidentially expected to find that democracy would be thwarted in and via Parliament. That democracy would be defied in Parliament. We anticipated correctly. We had done that as far back as December 2005. We had concluded even before that date that ANY bureaucracy that was set up in the UK either by the UK Government or by the UK parliamentary majority in the UK parliament acting under the de facto influences of the lobbys that had been installed in the various parts of the bureaucracies in Parliament would violate the rights of the people. We said that that would be the case because of the corrupt way that the ‘business’ of parliament was carried out in the UK.
We have been vindicated on each and every count since December 2005.
When we were contacted by the agents of the bureaucracy in the UK House of Lords in November 2007 about the possibility of our putting forward our objections to the contents of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as it was due to be processed in the legislative UK House of Lords, we knew that that approach was not genuine. that it was a sham acton. Intended to create a pretext for the bureaucracy to be able to claim that they did ‘everyone the chance to say what they wanted to s ay about Crossrail’.
As we knew that the UK House of Lords bureaucracy is as corrupt, as unconstitutional as its counterpart set up that existed in relation to the UK House of Commons.
We also knew that the House of Commons bureaucracy had given the Big Business agenda for Crossrail a clear run and had in effect approved of the contents of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ already The sham debate that was stage din the House of Commons on 19 July 2005 was a sham. With a very small - and unstained exception in terms of contribution in that ‘debate - the 19 July 2005 ‘debate’ was a disgrace and a scandal because the overwhelming majority of MPs
So when we got a communication or a circular ‘invite’ to contact the House of Lords bureaucracy,
we made clear our objections to the House of Lords itself being used as a stooge.
So from November 2007 to March 2008, we maintain that opposition.
Thus making our opposition manifold fold.
This multifaceted, multilayered opposition addressed the wrongs that are contained both in the particular piece of legislation that we were addressing As well as to parliament itself which was in control of the legislation. Or in apparent control of the legislation.
In drafting our analysis, or representation, we addressed all the key parts of the UK state and of the Uk Parliament.
In our e-mail sent on 14 and 15 January 2008, for instance, we addressed the key problems that stood in the way of our properly representing our opposition to the Crossrail hole Bill and the agenda that created that Bill. That agenda:: was and remains that of Big Business. And that of their stooges and touts. And that agenda was and remains hostile to the needs of the community. The Khoodeelaar! campaign having been founded for the community, founded in the community is the voice of opposition to that agenda and for the continuing defence of the community.
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law campaign; against Crossrail hole Plot - evidence dated 14 and 15 january 2008
“Date:
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:09:49 -0800 (PST)
From:
"Khoodeelaar NotoCrossrailholeBillUK" View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert
Subject:
Pre-formal communication to the House of Lords from KHOODEELAAR! Khoodeelaar! Objections to Crossrail Bill - as at 1255 Hrs Monday 15.01.2008
To:
[emailaddress1]@parliament.uk, [emailaddress{2}]@parliament.uk
CC:
bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk, lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk
Khoodeelaar! needs answers to the factual questions as
put to you on 14.01.2008
All rights reserved and IPRs asserted by© MUHAMMAD HAQUE and
KHOODEELAAR! And AADHIKAR Media Foundation and CBRUK 2008. This
publication and communication is from the Brick Lane and Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill [the draft - and HYBRID- piece of legislation awaiting formal enactment s now in the UK House of Lords as at Thursday 3 January 2008] Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign information, comments, position statements and news are published on a number of web sites including:
www.khoodeelaar.com
www.aadhikar.com
www.cbruk.com
http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnews/today.html
________________________________________________________
Message [ Download File ]
Date:
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:57:22 -0800 (PST)
From:
"Khoodeelaar NotoCrossrailholeBillUK"
Subject:
Pre-formal communication to the House of Lords from KHOODEELAAR! Khoodeelaar! Objections to Crossrail Bill - as at 1255 Hrs Monday 15.01.2008
To:
[email address.{3}]@parliament.uk
CC:
[email address.{3}]@parliament.uk, bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk, lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk
Dear [[email address.{3}] A and Ms B and Ms C]
the Objections to the CROSSRAIL BILL
Khoodeelaar! Questions as put to the House of Lords
office concerned on Monday 14 January 2008, about the
Procedural 'decision' by [=including on the ASSUMED
behalf of] the 'House of Lords' about the scope of the
objections to the ‘Crossrail Bill’
the Context:
the contents of the ‘guidance’ notes so far received,
show that there are limitations to the
Objections. Those limitations are described in the
notes. So there is no need to repeat them here.
the Question [in parts marked by alphabets]:
a. Did the House of Lords [as defined here, above]
make the decision by actively considering the
constitutional duties, obligations and implications of
the UK Houses of Parliament [=UK Parliament] as those
arise from the UK’s Treaty obligations [ECHR]
[=’Treaty of Rome’ and the relevant subsequent forms,
formulations and agreements, as those stood on the
date/s of the relevant ‘decision/s’]?
b. If they did, what part of the ‘guidance notes’
contain categorical, unambiguous, straightforward and
clear reference/s to and evidence of such
consideration [=‘actively considering the
constitutional duties.’]?
c. If they did not, why?
d. Where – and what - are the, or any, [of the] sources in
constitutional and legally valid ‘justification’ and
or ‘support’ of the decision/s by ignoring and or overlooking the UK’s ECHR Treaty obligations concerned [as described and defined above]
[if any such is citable and or applicable]?
Yours sincerely
Muhammad Haque
1255 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 January 2008
All rights reserved and IPRs asserted by© MUHAMMAD HAQUE and
KHOODEELAAR! And AADHIKAR Media Foundation and CBRUK 2008. This publication and
communication is from the Brick Lane and Whitechapel and Stepney
London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill [the draft - and
HYBRID- piece of legislation awaiting formal enactment s now in the UK
House of Lords as at Thursday 3 January 2008]
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign information, comments,
position statements and news are published on a number of web sites
including:
www.khoodeelaar.com
www.aadhikar.com
www.cbruk.com
http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnews/today.html
Posted by AADHIKARonline London UK April 2007 at 06:24 0
1325 Hrs GMT
1425 Hrs UKTime
London Sunday 1 June 2008
We have been commenting for the past five days on and exposing the packaged lies for CROSSRAIL as contained in and represented by the ‘First Report’ published allegedly on 27 May 2008 in the name of the UK legislative House of Lords ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’.
the lies are for making the ‘proceedings’ referred to as being legitimate, genuine and truthful. the fact and the evidence are that the proceedings were a sham. Just as the equivalent proceedings as performed via the ‘House of Commons’ ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ during the two years [2005-2007] had been.
So why is KHOODEELAAR! bothering to pay so much attention to the lies as told via the ‘House of Lords’ by the Big Business Crossrail hole agenda promoters?
The answer is that because the lies are going to remain on the record and the record must be put right. Our publishing the particular expose will put on the public domain the actual facts and the truth can thereby be accessed.
Also the length of time that Khoodeelaar! has been spending in addressing every relevant aspect of the behaviour of the ‘legislative’ ‘UK House of Lords’ ‘Crossrail Bill’ ‘Select Committee’ in the context of our campaign to oppose the Crossrail hole plot has been significant. Our time, our resources and our specialist knowledge are being continued to be given to further the caused of the community’s rights. the community’s collective defence against the unconstitutional, immoral, unwanted attack on our community.
In particular, we are showing that we had ANTICIPATED that Parliament would be used as a barrier to our representation. We evidentially expected to find that democracy would be thwarted in and via Parliament. That democracy would be defied in Parliament. We anticipated correctly. We had done that as far back as December 2005. We had concluded even before that date that ANY bureaucracy that was set up in the UK either by the UK Government or by the UK parliamentary majority in the UK parliament acting under the de facto influences of the lobbys that had been installed in the various parts of the bureaucracies in Parliament would violate the rights of the people. We said that that would be the case because of the corrupt way that the ‘business’ of parliament was carried out in the UK.
We have been vindicated on each and every count since December 2005.
When we were contacted by the agents of the bureaucracy in the UK House of Lords in November 2007 about the possibility of our putting forward our objections to the contents of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as it was due to be processed in the legislative UK House of Lords, we knew that that approach was not genuine. that it was a sham acton. Intended to create a pretext for the bureaucracy to be able to claim that they did ‘everyone the chance to say what they wanted to s ay about Crossrail’.
As we knew that the UK House of Lords bureaucracy is as corrupt, as unconstitutional as its counterpart set up that existed in relation to the UK House of Commons.
We also knew that the House of Commons bureaucracy had given the Big Business agenda for Crossrail a clear run and had in effect approved of the contents of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ already The sham debate that was stage din the House of Commons on 19 July 2005 was a sham. With a very small - and unstained exception in terms of contribution in that ‘debate - the 19 July 2005 ‘debate’ was a disgrace and a scandal because the overwhelming majority of MPs
So when we got a communication or a circular ‘invite’ to contact the House of Lords bureaucracy,
we made clear our objections to the House of Lords itself being used as a stooge.
So from November 2007 to March 2008, we maintain that opposition.
Thus making our opposition manifold fold.
This multifaceted, multilayered opposition addressed the wrongs that are contained both in the particular piece of legislation that we were addressing As well as to parliament itself which was in control of the legislation. Or in apparent control of the legislation.
In drafting our analysis, or representation, we addressed all the key parts of the UK state and of the Uk Parliament.
In our e-mail sent on 14 and 15 January 2008, for instance, we addressed the key problems that stood in the way of our properly representing our opposition to the Crossrail hole Bill and the agenda that created that Bill. That agenda:: was and remains that of Big Business. And that of their stooges and touts. And that agenda was and remains hostile to the needs of the community. The Khoodeelaar! campaign having been founded for the community, founded in the community is the voice of opposition to that agenda and for the continuing defence of the community.
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law campaign; against Crossrail hole Plot - evidence dated 14 and 15 january 2008
“Date:
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:09:49 -0800 (PST)
From:
"Khoodeelaar NotoCrossrailholeBillUK" View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert
Subject:
Pre-formal communication to the House of Lords from KHOODEELAAR! Khoodeelaar! Objections to Crossrail Bill - as at 1255 Hrs Monday 15.01.2008
To:
[emailaddress1]@parliament.uk, [emailaddress{2}]@parliament.uk
CC:
bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk, lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk
Khoodeelaar! needs answers to the factual questions as
put to you on 14.01.2008
All rights reserved and IPRs asserted by© MUHAMMAD HAQUE and
KHOODEELAAR! And AADHIKAR Media Foundation and CBRUK 2008. This
publication and communication is from the Brick Lane and Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill [the draft - and HYBRID- piece of legislation awaiting formal enactment s now in the UK House of Lords as at Thursday 3 January 2008] Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign information, comments, position statements and news are published on a number of web sites including:
www.khoodeelaar.com
www.aadhikar.com
www.cbruk.com
http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnews/today.html
________________________________________________________
Message [ Download File ]
Date:
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:57:22 -0800 (PST)
From:
"Khoodeelaar NotoCrossrailholeBillUK"
Subject:
Pre-formal communication to the House of Lords from KHOODEELAAR! Khoodeelaar! Objections to Crossrail Bill - as at 1255 Hrs Monday 15.01.2008
To:
[email address.{3}]@parliament.uk
CC:
[email address.{3}]@parliament.uk, bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk, lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk
Dear [[email address.{3}] A and Ms B and Ms C]
the Objections to the CROSSRAIL BILL
Khoodeelaar! Questions as put to the House of Lords
office concerned on Monday 14 January 2008, about the
Procedural 'decision' by [=including on the ASSUMED
behalf of] the 'House of Lords' about the scope of the
objections to the ‘Crossrail Bill’
the Context:
the contents of the ‘guidance’ notes so far received,
show that there are limitations to the
Objections. Those limitations are described in the
notes. So there is no need to repeat them here.
the Question [in parts marked by alphabets]:
a. Did the House of Lords [as defined here, above]
make the decision by actively considering the
constitutional duties, obligations and implications of
the UK Houses of Parliament [=UK Parliament] as those
arise from the UK’s Treaty obligations [ECHR]
[=’Treaty of Rome’ and the relevant subsequent forms,
formulations and agreements, as those stood on the
date/s of the relevant ‘decision/s’]?
b. If they did, what part of the ‘guidance notes’
contain categorical, unambiguous, straightforward and
clear reference/s to and evidence of such
consideration [=‘actively considering the
constitutional duties.’]?
c. If they did not, why?
d. Where – and what - are the, or any, [of the] sources in
constitutional and legally valid ‘justification’ and
or ‘support’ of the decision/s by ignoring and or overlooking the UK’s ECHR Treaty obligations concerned [as described and defined above]
[if any such is citable and or applicable]?
Yours sincerely
Muhammad Haque
1255 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 January 2008
All rights reserved and IPRs asserted by© MUHAMMAD HAQUE and
KHOODEELAAR! And AADHIKAR Media Foundation and CBRUK 2008. This publication and
communication is from the Brick Lane and Whitechapel and Stepney
London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill [the draft - and
HYBRID- piece of legislation awaiting formal enactment s now in the UK
House of Lords as at Thursday 3 January 2008]
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign information, comments,
position statements and news are published on a number of web sites
including:
www.khoodeelaar.com
www.aadhikar.com
www.cbruk.com
http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnews/today.html
Posted by AADHIKARonline London UK April 2007 at 06:24 0
Evidence of impeccable constitutionality in the Khoodeelaar! campaign of opposition to Big Business Crossrail hole plot stooges in the 'House of Lords
By©Muhammad Haque
1325 Hrs GMT
1425 Hrs UKTime
London Sunday 1 June 2008
We have been commenting for the past five days on and exposing the packaged lies for CROSSRAIL as contained in and represented by the ‘First Report’ published allegedly on 27 May 2008 in the name of the UK legislative House of Lords ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’.
the lies are for making the ‘proceedings’ referred to as being legitimate, genuine and truthful. the fact and the evidence are that the proceedings were a sham. Just as the equivalent proceedings as performed via the ‘House of Commons’ ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ during the two years [2005-2007] had been.
So why is KHOODEELAAR! bothering to pay so much attention to the lies as told via the ‘House of Lords’ by the Big Business Crossrail hole agenda promoters?
The answer is that because the lies are going to remain on the record and the record must be put right. Our publishing the particular expose will put on the public domain the actual facts and the truth can thereby be accessed.
Also the length of time that Khoodeelaar! has been spending in addressing every relevant aspect of the behaviour of the ‘legislative’ ‘UK House of Lords’ ‘Crossrail Bill’ ‘Select Committee’ in the context of our campaign to oppose the Crossrail hole plot has been significant. Our time, our resources and our specialist knowledge are being continued to be given to further the caused of the community’s rights. the community’s collective defence against the unconstitutional, immoral, unwanted attack on our community.
In particular, we are showing that we had ANTICIPATED that Parliament would be used as a barrier to our representation. We evidentially expected to find that democracy would be thwarted in and via Parliament. That democracy would be defied in Parliamentary. We anticipated correctly. We had done that as far back as December 2005 that ANY bureaucracy that was set up in the UK either by the UK Government or by the UK parliamentary majority in the UK parliament acting under the de facto influences of the lobbys that had been installed in the various parts of the bureaucracies in Parliament would violate the rights of the people. We said that that would be the case because of the corrupt way that the ‘business’ of parliament was carried out in the UK.
We have been vindicated on each and every count since December 2005.
When we were contacted by the agents of the bureaucracy in the UK House of Lords in November 2007 about the possibility of our putting forward our objections to the contents of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as it was due to be processed in the legislative UK House of Lords, we knew that that approach was not genuine. that it was a sham acton. Intended to create a pretext for the bureaucracy to be able to claim that they did ‘everyone the chance to say what they wanted to s ay about Crossrail’.
As we knew that the UK House of Lords bureaucracy is as corrupt, as unconstitutional as its counterpart set up that existed in relation to the UK House of Commons.
We also knew that the House of Commons bureaucracy had given the Big Business agenda for Crossrail a clear run and had in effect approved of the contents of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ already The sham debate that was stage din the House of Commons on 19 July 2005 was a sham. With a very small - and unstained exception in terms of contribution in that ‘debate - the 19 July 2005 ‘debate’ was a disgrace and a scandal because the overwhelming majority of MPs
So when we got a communication or a circular ‘invite’ to contact the House of Lords bureaucracy,
we made clear our objections to the House of Lords itself being used as a stooge.
So from November 2007 to March 2008, we maintain that opposition.
Thus making our opposition manifold fold.
This multifaceted, multilayered opposition addressed the wrongs that are contained both in the particular piece of legislation that we were addressing As well as to parliament itself which was in control of the legislation. Or in apparent control of the legislation.
In drafting our analysis, or representation, we addressed all the key parts of the UK state and of the Uk Parliament.
In our e-mail sent on 14 and 15 January 2008, for instance, we addressed the key problems that stood in the way of our properly representing our opposition to the Crossrail hole Bill and the agenda that created that Bill. That agenda:: was and remains that of Big Business. And that of their stooges and touts. And that agenda was and remains hostile to the needs of the community. The Khoodeelaar! campaign having been founded for the community, foudned in the community is the voice of opposition to that agenda and for the continuing defence of the community.
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law campaign; against Crossrail hole Plot - evidence dated 14 and 15 january 2008
“Date:
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:09:49 -0800 (PST)
From:
"Khoodeelaar NotoCrossrailholeBillUK" View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert
Subject:
Pre-formal communication to the House of Lords from KHOODEELAAR! Khoodeelaar! Objections to Crossrail Bill - as at 1255 Hrs Monday 15.01.2008
To:
[emailaddress1]@parliament.uk, [emailaddress{2}]@parliament.uk
CC:
bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk, lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk
Khoodeelaar! needs answers to the factual questions as
put to you on 14.01.2008
All rights reserved and IPRs asserted by© MUHAMMAD HAQUE and
KHOODEELAAR! And AADHIKAR Media Foundation and CBRUK 2008. This
publication and communication is from the Brick Lane and Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill [the draft - and HYBRID- piece of legislation awaiting formal enactment s now in the UK House of Lords as at Thursday 3 January 2008] Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign information, comments, position statements and news are published on a number of web sites including:
www.khoodeelaar.com
www.aadhikar.com
www.cbruk.com
http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnews/today.html
________________________________________________________
Message [ Download File ]
Date:
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:57:22 -0800 (PST)
From:
"Khoodeelaar NotoCrossrailholeBillUK"
Subject:
Pre-formal communication to the House of Lords from KHOODEELAAR! Khoodeelaar! Objections to Crossrail Bill - as at 1255 Hrs Monday 15.01.2008
To:
[email address.{3}]@parliament.uk
CC:
[email address.{3}]@parliament.uk, bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk, lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk
Dear [[email address.{3}] A and Ms B and Ms C]
the Objections to the CROSSRAIL BILL
Khoodeelaar! Questions as put to the House of Lords
office concerned on Monday 14 January 2008, about the
Procedural 'decision' by [=including on the ASSUMED
behalf of] the 'House of Lords' about the scope of the
objections to the ‘Crossrail Bill’
the Context:
the contents of the ‘guidance’ notes so far received,
show that there are limitations to the
Objections. Those limitations are described in the
notes. So there is no need to repeat them here.
the Question [in parts marked by alphabets]:
a. Did the House of Lords [as defined here, above]
make the decision by actively considering the
constitutional duties, obligations and implications of
the UK Houses of Parliament [=UK Parliament] as those
arise from the UK’s Treaty obligations [ECHR]
[=’Treaty of Rome’ and the relevant subsequent forms,
formulations and agreements, as those stood on the
date/s of the relevant ‘decision/s’]?
b. If they did, what part of the ‘guidance notes’
contain categorical, unambiguous, straightforward and
clear reference/s to and evidence of such
consideration [=‘actively considering the
constitutional duties.’]?
c. If they did not, why?
d. Where – and what - are the, or any, [of the] sources in
constitutional and legally valid ‘justification’ and
or ‘support’ of the decision/s by ignoring and or overlooking the UK’s ECHR Treaty obligations concerned [as described and defined above]
[if any such is citable and or applicable]?
Yours sincerely
Muhammad Haque
1255 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 January 2008
All rights reserved and IPRs asserted by© MUHAMMAD HAQUE and
KHOODEELAAR! And AADHIKAR Media Foundation and CBRUK 2008. This publication and
communication is from the Brick Lane and Whitechapel and Stepney
London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill [the draft - and
HYBRID- piece of legislation awaiting formal enactment s now in the UK
House of Lords as at Thursday 3 January 2008]
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign information, comments,
position statements and news are published on a number of web sites
including:
www.khoodeelaar.com
www.aadhikar.com
www.cbruk.com
http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnews/today.html
1325 Hrs GMT
1425 Hrs UKTime
London Sunday 1 June 2008
We have been commenting for the past five days on and exposing the packaged lies for CROSSRAIL as contained in and represented by the ‘First Report’ published allegedly on 27 May 2008 in the name of the UK legislative House of Lords ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’.
the lies are for making the ‘proceedings’ referred to as being legitimate, genuine and truthful. the fact and the evidence are that the proceedings were a sham. Just as the equivalent proceedings as performed via the ‘House of Commons’ ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ during the two years [2005-2007] had been.
So why is KHOODEELAAR! bothering to pay so much attention to the lies as told via the ‘House of Lords’ by the Big Business Crossrail hole agenda promoters?
The answer is that because the lies are going to remain on the record and the record must be put right. Our publishing the particular expose will put on the public domain the actual facts and the truth can thereby be accessed.
Also the length of time that Khoodeelaar! has been spending in addressing every relevant aspect of the behaviour of the ‘legislative’ ‘UK House of Lords’ ‘Crossrail Bill’ ‘Select Committee’ in the context of our campaign to oppose the Crossrail hole plot has been significant. Our time, our resources and our specialist knowledge are being continued to be given to further the caused of the community’s rights. the community’s collective defence against the unconstitutional, immoral, unwanted attack on our community.
In particular, we are showing that we had ANTICIPATED that Parliament would be used as a barrier to our representation. We evidentially expected to find that democracy would be thwarted in and via Parliament. That democracy would be defied in Parliamentary. We anticipated correctly. We had done that as far back as December 2005 that ANY bureaucracy that was set up in the UK either by the UK Government or by the UK parliamentary majority in the UK parliament acting under the de facto influences of the lobbys that had been installed in the various parts of the bureaucracies in Parliament would violate the rights of the people. We said that that would be the case because of the corrupt way that the ‘business’ of parliament was carried out in the UK.
We have been vindicated on each and every count since December 2005.
When we were contacted by the agents of the bureaucracy in the UK House of Lords in November 2007 about the possibility of our putting forward our objections to the contents of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as it was due to be processed in the legislative UK House of Lords, we knew that that approach was not genuine. that it was a sham acton. Intended to create a pretext for the bureaucracy to be able to claim that they did ‘everyone the chance to say what they wanted to s ay about Crossrail’.
As we knew that the UK House of Lords bureaucracy is as corrupt, as unconstitutional as its counterpart set up that existed in relation to the UK House of Commons.
We also knew that the House of Commons bureaucracy had given the Big Business agenda for Crossrail a clear run and had in effect approved of the contents of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ already The sham debate that was stage din the House of Commons on 19 July 2005 was a sham. With a very small - and unstained exception in terms of contribution in that ‘debate - the 19 July 2005 ‘debate’ was a disgrace and a scandal because the overwhelming majority of MPs
So when we got a communication or a circular ‘invite’ to contact the House of Lords bureaucracy,
we made clear our objections to the House of Lords itself being used as a stooge.
So from November 2007 to March 2008, we maintain that opposition.
Thus making our opposition manifold fold.
This multifaceted, multilayered opposition addressed the wrongs that are contained both in the particular piece of legislation that we were addressing As well as to parliament itself which was in control of the legislation. Or in apparent control of the legislation.
In drafting our analysis, or representation, we addressed all the key parts of the UK state and of the Uk Parliament.
In our e-mail sent on 14 and 15 January 2008, for instance, we addressed the key problems that stood in the way of our properly representing our opposition to the Crossrail hole Bill and the agenda that created that Bill. That agenda:: was and remains that of Big Business. And that of their stooges and touts. And that agenda was and remains hostile to the needs of the community. The Khoodeelaar! campaign having been founded for the community, foudned in the community is the voice of opposition to that agenda and for the continuing defence of the community.
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law campaign; against Crossrail hole Plot - evidence dated 14 and 15 january 2008
“Date:
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:09:49 -0800 (PST)
From:
"Khoodeelaar NotoCrossrailholeBillUK"
Subject:
Pre-formal communication to the House of Lords from KHOODEELAAR! Khoodeelaar! Objections to Crossrail Bill - as at 1255 Hrs Monday 15.01.2008
To:
[emailaddress1]@parliament.uk, [emailaddress{2}]@parliament.uk
CC:
bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk, lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk
Khoodeelaar! needs answers to the factual questions as
put to you on 14.01.2008
All rights reserved and IPRs asserted by© MUHAMMAD HAQUE and
KHOODEELAAR! And AADHIKAR Media Foundation and CBRUK 2008. This
publication and communication is from the Brick Lane and Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill [the draft - and HYBRID- piece of legislation awaiting formal enactment s now in the UK House of Lords as at Thursday 3 January 2008] Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign information, comments, position statements and news are published on a number of web sites including:
www.khoodeelaar.com
www.aadhikar.com
www.cbruk.com
http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnews/today.html
________________________________________________________
Message [ Download File ]
Date:
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:57:22 -0800 (PST)
From:
"Khoodeelaar NotoCrossrailholeBillUK"
Subject:
Pre-formal communication to the House of Lords from KHOODEELAAR! Khoodeelaar! Objections to Crossrail Bill - as at 1255 Hrs Monday 15.01.2008
To:
[email address.{3}]@parliament.uk
CC:
[email address.{3}]@parliament.uk, bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk, lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk
Dear [[email address.{3}] A and Ms B and Ms C]
the Objections to the CROSSRAIL BILL
Khoodeelaar! Questions as put to the House of Lords
office concerned on Monday 14 January 2008, about the
Procedural 'decision' by [=including on the ASSUMED
behalf of] the 'House of Lords' about the scope of the
objections to the ‘Crossrail Bill’
the Context:
the contents of the ‘guidance’ notes so far received,
show that there are limitations to the
Objections. Those limitations are described in the
notes. So there is no need to repeat them here.
the Question [in parts marked by alphabets]:
a. Did the House of Lords [as defined here, above]
make the decision by actively considering the
constitutional duties, obligations and implications of
the UK Houses of Parliament [=UK Parliament] as those
arise from the UK’s Treaty obligations [ECHR]
[=’Treaty of Rome’ and the relevant subsequent forms,
formulations and agreements, as those stood on the
date/s of the relevant ‘decision/s’]?
b. If they did, what part of the ‘guidance notes’
contain categorical, unambiguous, straightforward and
clear reference/s to and evidence of such
consideration [=‘actively considering the
constitutional duties.’]?
c. If they did not, why?
d. Where – and what - are the, or any, [of the] sources in
constitutional and legally valid ‘justification’ and
or ‘support’ of the decision/s by ignoring and or overlooking the UK’s ECHR Treaty obligations concerned [as described and defined above]
[if any such is citable and or applicable]?
Yours sincerely
Muhammad Haque
1255 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 January 2008
All rights reserved and IPRs asserted by© MUHAMMAD HAQUE and
KHOODEELAAR! And AADHIKAR Media Foundation and CBRUK 2008. This publication and
communication is from the Brick Lane and Whitechapel and Stepney
London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill [the draft - and
HYBRID- piece of legislation awaiting formal enactment s now in the UK
House of Lords as at Thursday 3 January 2008]
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign information, comments,
position statements and news are published on a number of web sites
including:
www.khoodeelaar.com
www.aadhikar.com
www.cbruk.com
http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnews/today.html
Gordon Brown can still establish parliamentary ethics and democratic 'values' by scrapping the Big Business interests’ ploy Crossrail....
0655 Hrs GMT 0755 Hrs UK Time London Sunday 1 June 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill is the campaign against the agenda of greed, the agenda of selfishness perpetrated on a big scale by big business at the expense of ordinary people... Khoodeelaar! is carrying out the exposure of the greed by daily examining the latest evidence of the perpetrators wrongs...
The impoverishment of sense that has been on display in the wrongful, callous conduct via the bureaucracy of the ‘House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ is the sort of wrong that must be condemned on universally recognisable basis of morality...
The behaviour of the stooged parliamentarians propelled by the interest that are promoting the agenda of Big Business like the USA Bechtel corporation is contrary to the principles of good economics and runs counter to the basic requirements of accountability, democracy and representation.... The Big Business agenda of greed is an agenda against common sense against ‘prudence....This debasing of the ‘British parliament’ is the debasing of all things decent... all values worth defending.... The opposite of what Gordon Brown so boastfully called ‘British vahloos’.... Now Brown has been put in the prison of collusion with the very forces that defy the same ‘British vahloos’... It is time to free Gordon Brown from that prison... Does Brown have the courage to make a bid to liberate the country from the stranglehold of Big Business corruption and their agents in parliament? Is Brown really capable of listening to the truth. In time and on time? If he has then this is the time to set an example and to set himself politically and constitutionally free - by scrapping the London Crossrail hole plot....
By©Muhammad Haque
0550 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday 1 June 2008
The physical poverty, deprivation that the Crossrail hole agenda would ADD to the East End of London is linked with the poverty of sense as seen in Parliament
The poverty, the unsettlement and the deprivation are typical of the consequences that result from all Big Business scams.
No prudent Prime Minister would sanction such activities. yet Gordon Brown was corralled by Ken Livingstone into doing exactly that. THere is still time for Gordon Brown to avoid this particular package of follies. By scrapping the Crossrail hoe plot NOW.
Khoodeelaar! is campaigning against ADDITIONAL deprivation that Crossrail hole plot will bring to the East End, as we are against the poverty of sense and rationality that has been on rampant display in the UK Parliament. In the two exhibitions of stooged ‘Select Committee’ that have performed in accordance with the greedy, corrupting purpose of Big Business that has set its agenda on grabbing as much of the UK Public cash as it can under the latest pretext of ‘big infrastructure project’ called a London Crossrail...If the poverty of audit, the emptiness of accountability, the desertion of scrutiny in and by ‘Parliament’ that we have witnessed so far in the corrupt conduct of the two stooged select committees in the ‘House of commons and in the ‘House of Lords’ is really how the ‘Mother of all Parliaments’ actually does its business then the ‘people’ of the UK have a lot of strife coming .....
.For when Parliament perpetrates the agenda of lies and liars, there cannot be any resort to any other forum except to despair.... Is this what Gordon Brown wants the people of inner city East End of London to share with the people in the rest of the UK and to tell the others beyond the boundaries of the UK, as our experience of trying to tell the truth to ‘the democratic UK Parliament’ before it [the UK Parliament] makes one particular piece of ‘law’...? Is this why Brown has continued Blair’s legacy of evil? Of signalling to the whips - the de facto storm troopers within parliament to keep democracy in check - to exert their mala fide ‘powers’ and silence the voices of truth... against a seriously flawed measure success the CRASSLY conceived, wasteful, diversionary, Big Business scam called Crossrail? That the UK parliament is deaf to the truth? That UK Parliament is hostile to the evidence that contains the truth? That the UK parliament is a hindrance to peoples’; reasonable, rational and considered representation of the truth about the use and the abuse of public resource?
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill is the campaign against the agenda of greed, the agenda of selfishness perpetrated on a big scale by big business at the expense of ordinary people... Khoodeelaar! is carrying out the exposure of the greed by daily examining the latest evidence of the perpetrators wrongs...
The impoverishment of sense that has been on display in the wrongful, callous conduct via the bureaucracy of the ‘House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ is the sort of wrong that must be condemned on universally recognisable basis of morality...
The behaviour of the stooged parliamentarians propelled by the interest that are promoting the agenda of Big Business like the USA Bechtel corporation is contrary to the principles of good economics and runs counter to the basic requirements of accountability, democracy and representation.... The Big Business agenda of greed is an agenda against common sense against ‘prudence....This debasing of the ‘British parliament’ is the debasing of all things decent... all values worth defending.... The opposite of what Gordon Brown so boastfully called ‘British vahloos’.... Now Brown has been put in the prison of collusion with the very forces that defy the same ‘British vahloos’... It is time to free Gordon Brown from that prison... Does Brown have the courage to make a bid to liberate the country from the stranglehold of Big Business corruption and their agents in parliament? Is Brown really capable of listening to the truth. In time and on time? If he has then this is the time to set an example and to set himself politically and constitutionally free - by scrapping the London Crossrail hole plot....
By©Muhammad Haque
0550 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday 1 June 2008
The physical poverty, deprivation that the Crossrail hole agenda would ADD to the East End of London is linked with the poverty of sense as seen in Parliament
The poverty, the unsettlement and the deprivation are typical of the consequences that result from all Big Business scams.
No prudent Prime Minister would sanction such activities. yet Gordon Brown was corralled by Ken Livingstone into doing exactly that. THere is still time for Gordon Brown to avoid this particular package of follies. By scrapping the Crossrail hoe plot NOW.
Khoodeelaar! is campaigning against ADDITIONAL deprivation that Crossrail hole plot will bring to the East End, as we are against the poverty of sense and rationality that has been on rampant display in the UK Parliament. In the two exhibitions of stooged ‘Select Committee’ that have performed in accordance with the greedy, corrupting purpose of Big Business that has set its agenda on grabbing as much of the UK Public cash as it can under the latest pretext of ‘big infrastructure project’ called a London Crossrail...If the poverty of audit, the emptiness of accountability, the desertion of scrutiny in and by ‘Parliament’ that we have witnessed so far in the corrupt conduct of the two stooged select committees in the ‘House of commons and in the ‘House of Lords’ is really how the ‘Mother of all Parliaments’ actually does its business then the ‘people’ of the UK have a lot of strife coming .....
.For when Parliament perpetrates the agenda of lies and liars, there cannot be any resort to any other forum except to despair.... Is this what Gordon Brown wants the people of inner city East End of London to share with the people in the rest of the UK and to tell the others beyond the boundaries of the UK, as our experience of trying to tell the truth to ‘the democratic UK Parliament’ before it [the UK Parliament] makes one particular piece of ‘law’...? Is this why Brown has continued Blair’s legacy of evil? Of signalling to the whips - the de facto storm troopers within parliament to keep democracy in check - to exert their mala fide ‘powers’ and silence the voices of truth... against a seriously flawed measure success the CRASSLY conceived, wasteful, diversionary, Big Business scam called Crossrail? That the UK parliament is deaf to the truth? That UK Parliament is hostile to the evidence that contains the truth? That the UK parliament is a hindrance to peoples’; reasonable, rational and considered representation of the truth about the use and the abuse of public resource?
[To be continued]
Saturday, May 31, 2008
Khoodeelaar! tells Gordon Brown to end the poverty of sense in the UK parliament.. It is the only way Brown can get the credibility he seeks...
Khoodeelaar! is campaigning against ADDITIONAL deprivation that Crossrail hole plot will bring to the East End, as we are against the poverty of sense and rationality that has been on rampant display in the UK Parliament. In the two exhibitions of stooged ‘Select Committee’ that have performed in accordance with the greedy, corrupting purpose of Big Business that has set its agenda on grabbing as much of the UK Public cash as it can under the latest pretext of ‘big infrastructure project’ called a London Crossrail...If the poverty of audit, the emptiness of accountability, the desertion of scrutiny in and by ‘Parliament’ that we have witnessed so far in the corrupt conduct of the two stooged select committees in the ‘House of commons and in the ‘House of Lords’ is really how the ‘Mother of all Parliaments’ actually doe sits business then the ‘people’ of the UK have a lot of strife coming .....
.For when Parliament perpetrates the agenda of lies and liars, there cannot be any resort to any other forum except to despair....
Is this what Gordon Brown wants the people of inner city East End of London to share with the people in the rest of the UK and to tell the others beyond the boundaries of the UK, as our experience of trying to tell the truth to ‘the democratic UK Parliament’ before it [the UK Parliament] makes one particular piece of ‘law’...? Is this why Brown has continued Blair’s legacy of evil? Of signalling to the whips - the de facto storm troopers within parliament to keep democracy in check - to exert their mala fide ‘powers’ and silence the voices of truth... against a seriously flawed measure success the CRASSLY conceived, wasteful, diversionary, Big Business scam called Crossrail? That the UK parliament is deaf to the truth? That UK Parliament is hostile to the evidence that contains the truth? That the UK parliament is a hindrance to peoples’; reasonable, rational and considered representation of the truth about the use and the abuse of public resource?
[To be continued]
.For when Parliament perpetrates the agenda of lies and liars, there cannot be any resort to any other forum except to despair....
Is this what Gordon Brown wants the people of inner city East End of London to share with the people in the rest of the UK and to tell the others beyond the boundaries of the UK, as our experience of trying to tell the truth to ‘the democratic UK Parliament’ before it [the UK Parliament] makes one particular piece of ‘law’...? Is this why Brown has continued Blair’s legacy of evil? Of signalling to the whips - the de facto storm troopers within parliament to keep democracy in check - to exert their mala fide ‘powers’ and silence the voices of truth... against a seriously flawed measure success the CRASSLY conceived, wasteful, diversionary, Big Business scam called Crossrail? That the UK parliament is deaf to the truth? That UK Parliament is hostile to the evidence that contains the truth? That the UK parliament is a hindrance to peoples’; reasonable, rational and considered representation of the truth about the use and the abuse of public resource?
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! the inner city, East End of London CAMPAIGN against Big Business Crossrail is leading on constitutionality too...
On Sunday 22 January 2006, at a Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN meeting held at the 'Brady Centre', 192 Hanbury Street, London E1, the KHOODEELAAR! campaign organiser gave the key note speech about the campaign. In the speech, he also stated, extempore, the core of a motion that the meeting unanimously supported DEMANDING that the local Tower Hamlets Council passed a full Council motion saying ‘No to the Crossrail hole Bill’.
Two years 4 months have passed since that time and the Khoodeelaar! campaign has been renewing the same demand to the Council. The Tower Hamlets Council has not passed that motion. The community has not been respected by Tower Hamlets Council on this issue. Yet the 'councillors' who attended that meeting have remained on the same Council claiming to represent the community that is affected by the Crossrail hole plot.....
So what is the secret? Is it in any way to do with any ambiguity about what was said in the Khoodeelaar! campaign demand as passed by the meeting held on 22 January 2006?
There could be no ambiguity.
Just for the records, we again publish the main text of the KHOODEELAAR! legal action process service communication about the demand that was sent to the then 'chief executive' in the Tower Hamlets Borough COUNCIL , Christine Gilbert on 25 January 2006.
By©Muhammad Haque .....
Wednesday 25 January 2006
To
Christine Gilbert
Chief Executive
And
Owen Whalley
Head of Major Project Development
London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council
Mulberry Place
5 Clove Crescent
London E14 2BG
Dear Ms Gilbert and Mr Whalley
Subject Khoodeelaar campaign meeting –
Demand 22 January 2006 –
The texts [2] sent by fax 25 Jan 2006
1. You both have been sent this morning the main texts of the KHOODEELAAR!
campaign resolution as delivered and agreed at the meeting on 22 January 2006 held [at the Brady centre, 192 Hanbury street London E1] in the evening of Sunday 22 January 2006 demanding that the London borough of tower hamlets council pass a single motion as their resolution against the Crossrail hole plan/bill as it is in the uk house of commons now and that they do so in the next 11 days and that the resolution be put to the uk parliament and to the uk secretary of state transport department [Department for Transport= ‘DfT’] and that the resolution be phrased and drafted in an unambiguous unequivocal way accurately truthfully reflecting and representing the demand of the community.
2. Mr Owen Whalley has been sent the copy – and is being sent this further amplifier and clarifier – because of the central role he has been playing (as the published documents of the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council suggest) in the promotion of the Crossrail hole scheme/project/bill as far as the ‘development’ of the Crossrail ‘project’ for the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council goes. He has been sent the material also in order for him to be in receipt of what the community has demanded and what he as the designated employee on ‘Crossrail’ in the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council has to do so that the community’s lawful and urgent demand is seen to be recognised and implemented by the relevant employees in the council on every relevant occasion.
3. As the same campaign meeting [22 January 2006] also agreed the taking of legal action in the event that tower hamlets council fail to implement the demand, you both are most certainly going to be included as parties in any such action and so you are being sent this in our voluntary compliance with the requirements of natural justice, due process [and other related concepts] and the civil procedure rules.
4. The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in defence of the BRICK LANE London E1 AREA and against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project/bill is able to confirm to you both today Wednesday 25 January 2006 that we shall include additional demands for the very detailed legal and democratic and economic accountability from the council over any additional costs that tower hamlets council is caused to be embroiled in or involved in or engaged in - whether in any further attempt/s on the parts of those who have access to the finances and the ‘powers’ and the contacts of the London borough of tower hamlets council to justify their roles and their promotions of the Crossrail hole project or in any further unreasonable, irresponsible, improper, undemocratic, antisocial and or ill-conceived egotistic bid/s in defiance of the very clearly expressed demands of the local community and or in defiance of the campaigning organisations representing the fears, needs and demands of the local community against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project/bill and you both shall be included in any list of witnesses who will be asked to give evidence on their own roles and the origins of any orders or decisions that caused them to play the parts that you found yourselves playing in defiance of the local community’s clear demand against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project Bill. 5. Ms Christine Gilbert has been put on notice since the first quarter of 2004 when the chair of the CBRUK organisation (which politically organised the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign during that same period in 2004) initiated the first series of extensive questions which were drafted and put to her concerning the role she had played in advising and or working with or in carrying out the actual intentions of any controlling group member of the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council on the Crossrail hole scheme/project/scheme. She has failed to date to deal with those questions and despite two recent [final] reminders has continued to fail or refuse to answer the outstanding questions. She has also failed to provide any lawful or reasonable explanation or lawful justification for her conduct and role concerned in the context of the KHOODEELAAR campaign demands, questions and representations.
6. The statements that have been published in the past two weeks in the name of or by the uses and abuses of the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council as the corporate entity and about the Crossrail hole bill have contained more than one contradictory assertion and allusion to alleged facts thus creating new grounds for the community to be able to claim that ‘the TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL’ in general and the identifiable ‘controlling group’ councillors are carrying on conducting themselves in defiance of or in conflict with the wishes and the interests of the local community concerned.
7. The KHOODEELAAR campaign is able to confirm to both ms Christine Gilbert and Mr Owen Whalley that this communication dated and transmitted on Wednesday 25 January 2006 is being made to both of them as a very last attempt at helping the controlling persons involved in the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council over the Crossrail hole scheme/project/ bill avoid placing or pushing the corporate entity of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council and its resources in a very costly confrontation with the community in the East End
8. Mr Owen Whalley’s circular ‘to all members’ of the TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL dated 19 September 2005 contains a misleading statement that is of crucial relevance to us and which statement as put to the meeting of 22 January 2006 and was loudly and clearly rejected by the meeting. That statement is in the last sentence in paragraph two of the circular (‘the petition also makes explicit the council’s opposition to an intervention shaft in Hanbury Street and preference for its relocation to Woodseer Street’.)
9. The meaning of the phrase ‘misleading statement’ in this context is any statement that contradicts the community’s opposition to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail hole, to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail shaft tunnel, to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail hole in THE BRICK LANE London E1 AREA and in any other part of THE London BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS. This is the position as expressed by the public meeting in support of the KHOODEELAAR campaign held at the Brady centre on Sunday 22 January 2006.
This takes into account the KHOODEELAAR CAMPAIGN'S remit which recognises the rights of the people in the Mile End area that is also affected by the known Crossrail plans.
10. The KHOODEELAAR campaign is able to confirm that it will treat this document and communication [25 January 2006] as being a reasonable final comprehensive advice, notice and representation to the two most relevant employees in the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council of the community’s simple and straightforward demand and position on the role of the LBTH Council in the matter of the Crossrail hole project/scheme/ Bill and of the task that the community has asked the LBTH Council to carry out within the specified time by passing the resolution and then making the same resolution available to the MPs select committee currently sitting to formally consider the relevant aspects of the Crossrail hole Bill [‘the Crossrail Bill’ or the ‘Crossrail hybrid Bill’] in time so that there is no frustration of the community’s wish in the remainder of the process of legislation involved.
KHOODEELAAR campaign demand 22 January 2006 and follow-up legal notice to Christine Gilbert and Owen Whalley concluded at 1436 Hrs GMT on Wednesday 25 January 2006”
Two years 4 months have passed since that time and the Khoodeelaar! campaign has been renewing the same demand to the Council. The Tower Hamlets Council has not passed that motion. The community has not been respected by Tower Hamlets Council on this issue. Yet the 'councillors' who attended that meeting have remained on the same Council claiming to represent the community that is affected by the Crossrail hole plot.....
So what is the secret? Is it in any way to do with any ambiguity about what was said in the Khoodeelaar! campaign demand as passed by the meeting held on 22 January 2006?
There could be no ambiguity.
Just for the records, we again publish the main text of the KHOODEELAAR! legal action process service communication about the demand that was sent to the then 'chief executive' in the Tower Hamlets Borough COUNCIL , Christine Gilbert on 25 January 2006.
By©Muhammad Haque .....
Wednesday 25 January 2006
To
Christine Gilbert
Chief Executive
And
Owen Whalley
Head of Major Project Development
London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council
Mulberry Place
5 Clove Crescent
London E14 2BG
Dear Ms Gilbert and Mr Whalley
Subject Khoodeelaar campaign meeting –
Demand 22 January 2006 –
The texts [2] sent by fax 25 Jan 2006
1. You both have been sent this morning the main texts of the KHOODEELAAR!
campaign resolution as delivered and agreed at the meeting on 22 January 2006 held [at the Brady centre, 192 Hanbury street London E1] in the evening of Sunday 22 January 2006 demanding that the London borough of tower hamlets council pass a single motion as their resolution against the Crossrail hole plan/bill as it is in the uk house of commons now and that they do so in the next 11 days and that the resolution be put to the uk parliament and to the uk secretary of state transport department [Department for Transport= ‘DfT’] and that the resolution be phrased and drafted in an unambiguous unequivocal way accurately truthfully reflecting and representing the demand of the community.
2. Mr Owen Whalley has been sent the copy – and is being sent this further amplifier and clarifier – because of the central role he has been playing (as the published documents of the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council suggest) in the promotion of the Crossrail hole scheme/project/bill as far as the ‘development’ of the Crossrail ‘project’ for the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council goes. He has been sent the material also in order for him to be in receipt of what the community has demanded and what he as the designated employee on ‘Crossrail’ in the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council has to do so that the community’s lawful and urgent demand is seen to be recognised and implemented by the relevant employees in the council on every relevant occasion.
3. As the same campaign meeting [22 January 2006] also agreed the taking of legal action in the event that tower hamlets council fail to implement the demand, you both are most certainly going to be included as parties in any such action and so you are being sent this in our voluntary compliance with the requirements of natural justice, due process [and other related concepts] and the civil procedure rules.
4. The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in defence of the BRICK LANE London E1 AREA and against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project/bill is able to confirm to you both today Wednesday 25 January 2006 that we shall include additional demands for the very detailed legal and democratic and economic accountability from the council over any additional costs that tower hamlets council is caused to be embroiled in or involved in or engaged in - whether in any further attempt/s on the parts of those who have access to the finances and the ‘powers’ and the contacts of the London borough of tower hamlets council to justify their roles and their promotions of the Crossrail hole project or in any further unreasonable, irresponsible, improper, undemocratic, antisocial and or ill-conceived egotistic bid/s in defiance of the very clearly expressed demands of the local community and or in defiance of the campaigning organisations representing the fears, needs and demands of the local community against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project/bill and you both shall be included in any list of witnesses who will be asked to give evidence on their own roles and the origins of any orders or decisions that caused them to play the parts that you found yourselves playing in defiance of the local community’s clear demand against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project Bill. 5. Ms Christine Gilbert has been put on notice since the first quarter of 2004 when the chair of the CBRUK organisation (which politically organised the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign during that same period in 2004) initiated the first series of extensive questions which were drafted and put to her concerning the role she had played in advising and or working with or in carrying out the actual intentions of any controlling group member of the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council on the Crossrail hole scheme/project/scheme. She has failed to date to deal with those questions and despite two recent [final] reminders has continued to fail or refuse to answer the outstanding questions. She has also failed to provide any lawful or reasonable explanation or lawful justification for her conduct and role concerned in the context of the KHOODEELAAR campaign demands, questions and representations.
6. The statements that have been published in the past two weeks in the name of or by the uses and abuses of the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council as the corporate entity and about the Crossrail hole bill have contained more than one contradictory assertion and allusion to alleged facts thus creating new grounds for the community to be able to claim that ‘the TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL’ in general and the identifiable ‘controlling group’ councillors are carrying on conducting themselves in defiance of or in conflict with the wishes and the interests of the local community concerned.
7. The KHOODEELAAR campaign is able to confirm to both ms Christine Gilbert and Mr Owen Whalley that this communication dated and transmitted on Wednesday 25 January 2006 is being made to both of them as a very last attempt at helping the controlling persons involved in the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council over the Crossrail hole scheme/project/ bill avoid placing or pushing the corporate entity of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council and its resources in a very costly confrontation with the community in the East End
8. Mr Owen Whalley’s circular ‘to all members’ of the TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL dated 19 September 2005 contains a misleading statement that is of crucial relevance to us and which statement as put to the meeting of 22 January 2006 and was loudly and clearly rejected by the meeting. That statement is in the last sentence in paragraph two of the circular (‘the petition also makes explicit the council’s opposition to an intervention shaft in Hanbury Street and preference for its relocation to Woodseer Street’.)
9. The meaning of the phrase ‘misleading statement’ in this context is any statement that contradicts the community’s opposition to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail hole, to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail shaft tunnel, to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail hole in THE BRICK LANE London E1 AREA and in any other part of THE London BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS. This is the position as expressed by the public meeting in support of the KHOODEELAAR campaign held at the Brady centre on Sunday 22 January 2006.
This takes into account the KHOODEELAAR CAMPAIGN'S remit which recognises the rights of the people in the Mile End area that is also affected by the known Crossrail plans.
10. The KHOODEELAAR campaign is able to confirm that it will treat this document and communication [25 January 2006] as being a reasonable final comprehensive advice, notice and representation to the two most relevant employees in the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council of the community’s simple and straightforward demand and position on the role of the LBTH Council in the matter of the Crossrail hole project/scheme/ Bill and of the task that the community has asked the LBTH Council to carry out within the specified time by passing the resolution and then making the same resolution available to the MPs select committee currently sitting to formally consider the relevant aspects of the Crossrail hole Bill [‘the Crossrail Bill’ or the ‘Crossrail hybrid Bill’] in time so that there is no frustration of the community’s wish in the remainder of the process of legislation involved.
KHOODEELAAR campaign demand 22 January 2006 and follow-up legal notice to Christine Gilbert and Owen Whalley concluded at 1436 Hrs GMT on Wednesday 25 January 2006”
KHOODEELAAR! the inner city, East End of London CAMPAIGN against Big Business Crossrail is leading on constitutionality too...
On Sunday 22 January 2006, at a Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN meeting held at the 'Brady Centre', 192 Hanbury Street, London E1, the KHOODEELAAR! campaign organiser gave the key note speech about the campaign. In the speech, he also stated, extempore, the core of a motion that the meeting unanimously supported DEMANDING that the local Tower Hamlets Council passed a full Council motion saying ‘No to the Crossrail hole Bill’.
Two years 4 months have passed since that time and the Khoodeelaar! campaign has been renewing the same demand to the Council. The Tower Hamlets Council has not passed that motion. The community has not been respected by Tower Hamlets Council on this issue. Yet the 'councillors' who attended that meeting have remained on the same Council claiming to represent the community that is affected by the Crossrail hole plot.....
So what is the secret? Is it in any way to do with any ambiguity about what was said in the Khoodeelaar! campaign demand as passed by the meeting held on 22 January 2006?
There could be no ambiguity.
Just for the records, we again publish the main text of the KHOODEELAAR! legal action process service communication about the demand that was sent to the then 'chief executive' in the Tower Hamlets Borough COUNCIL , Christine Gilbert on 25 January 2006.
By©Muhammad Haque .....
Wednesday 25 January 2006
To
Christine Gilbert
Chief Executive
And
Owen Whalley
Head of Major Project Development
London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council
Mulberry Place
5 Clove Crescent
London E14 2BG
Dear Ms Gilbert and Mr Whalley
Subject Khoodeelaar campaign meeting –
Demand 22 January 2006 –
The texts [2] sent by fax 25 Jan 2006
1. You both have been sent this morning the main texts of the KHOODEELAAR!
campaign resolution as delivered and agreed at the meeting on 22 January 2006 held [at the Brady centre, 192 Hanbury street London E1] in the evening of Sunday 22 January 2006 demanding that the London borough of tower hamlets council pass a single motion as their resolution against the Crossrail hole plan/bill as it is in the uk house of commons now and that they do so in the next 11 days and that the resolution be put to the uk parliament and to the uk secretary of state transport department [Department for Transport= ‘DfT’] and that the resolution be phrased and drafted in an unambiguous unequivocal way accurately truthfully reflecting and representing the demand of the community.
2. Mr Owen Whalley has been sent the copy – and is being sent this further amplifier and clarifier – because of the central role he has been playing (as the published documents of the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council suggest) in the promotion of the Crossrail hole scheme/project/bill as far as the ‘development’ of the Crossrail ‘project’ for the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council goes. He has been sent the material also in order for him to be in receipt of what the community has demanded and what he as the designated employee on ‘Crossrail’ in the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council has to do so that the community’s lawful and urgent demand is seen to be recognised and implemented by the relevant employees in the council on every relevant occasion.
3. As the same campaign meeting [22 January 2006] also agreed the taking of legal action in the event that tower hamlets council fail to implement the demand, you both are most certainly going to be included as parties in any such action and so you are being sent this in our voluntary compliance with the requirements of natural justice, due process [and other related concepts] and the civil procedure rules.
4. The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in defence of the BRICK LANE London E1 AREA and against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project/bill is able to confirm to you both today Wednesday 25 January 2006 that we shall include additional demands for the very detailed legal and democratic and economic accountability from the council over any additional costs that tower hamlets council is caused to be embroiled in or involved in or engaged in - whether in any further attempt/s on the parts of those who have access to the finances and the ‘powers’ and the contacts of the London borough of tower hamlets council to justify their roles and their promotions of the Crossrail hole project or in any further unreasonable, irresponsible, improper, undemocratic, antisocial and or ill-conceived egotistic bid/s in defiance of the very clearly expressed demands of the local community and or in defiance of the campaigning organisations representing the fears, needs and demands of the local community against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project/bill and you both shall be included in any list of witnesses who will be asked to give evidence on their own roles and the origins of any orders or decisions that caused them to play the parts that you found yourselves playing in defiance of the local community’s clear demand against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project Bill. 5. Ms Christine Gilbert has been put on notice since the first quarter of 2004 when the chair of the CBRUK organisation (which politically organised the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign during that same period in 2004) initiated the first series of extensive questions which were drafted and put to her concerning the role she had played in advising and or working with or in carrying out the actual intentions of any controlling group member of the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council on the Crossrail hole scheme/project/scheme. She has failed to date to deal with those questions and despite two recent [final] reminders has continued to fail or refuse to answer the outstanding questions. She has also failed to provide any lawful or reasonable explanation or lawful justification for her conduct and role concerned in the context of the KHOODEELAAR campaign demands, questions and representations.
6. The statements that have been published in the past two weeks in the name of or by the uses and abuses of the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council as the corporate entity and about the Crossrail hole bill have contained more than one contradictory assertion and allusion to alleged facts thus creating new grounds for the community to be able to claim that ‘the TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL’ in general and the identifiable ‘controlling group’ councillors are carrying on conducting themselves in defiance of or in conflict with the wishes and the interests of the local community concerned.
7. The KHOODEELAAR campaign is able to confirm to both ms Christine Gilbert and Mr Owen Whalley that this communication dated and transmitted on Wednesday 25 January 2006 is being made to both of them as a very last attempt at helping the controlling persons involved in the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council over the Crossrail hole scheme/project/ bill avoid placing or pushing the corporate entity of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council and its resources in a very costly confrontation with the community in the East End
8. Mr Owen Whalley’s circular ‘to all members’ of the TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL dated 19 September 2005 contains a misleading statement that is of crucial relevance to us and which statement as put to the meeting of 22 January 2006 and was loudly and clearly rejected by the meeting. That statement is in the last sentence in paragraph two of the circular (‘the petition also makes explicit the council’s opposition to an intervention shaft in Hanbury Street and preference for its relocation to Woodseer Street’.)
9. The meaning of the phrase ‘misleading statement’ in this context is any statement that contradicts the community’s opposition to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail hole, to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail shaft tunnel, to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail hole in THE BRICK LANE London E1 AREA and in any other part of THE London BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS. This is the position as expressed by the public meeting in support of the KHOODEELAAR campaign held at the Brady centre on Sunday 22 January 2006.
This takes into account the KHOODEELAAR CAMPAIGN'S remit which recognises the rights of the people in the Mile End area that is also affected by the known Crossrail plans.
10. The KHOODEELAAR campaign is able to confirm that it will treat this document and communication [25 January 2006] as being a reasonable final comprehensive advice, notice and representation to the two most relevant employees in the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council of the community’s simple and straightforward demand and position on the role of the LBTH Council in the matter of the Crossrail hole project/scheme/ Bill and of the task that the community has asked the LBTH Council to carry out within the specified time by passing the resolution and then making the same resolution available to the MPs select committee currently sitting to formally consider the relevant aspects of the Crossrail hole Bill [‘the Crossrail Bill’ or the ‘Crossrail hybrid Bill’] in time so that there is no frustration of the community’s wish in the remainder of the process of legislation involved.
KHOODEELAAR campaign demand 22 January 2006 and follow-up legal notice to Christine Gilbert and Owen Whalley concluded at 1436 Hrs GMT on Wednesday 25 January 2006”
Two years 4 months have passed since that time and the Khoodeelaar! campaign has been renewing the same demand to the Council. The Tower Hamlets Council has not passed that motion. The community has not been respected by Tower Hamlets Council on this issue. Yet the 'councillors' who attended that meeting have remained on the same Council claiming to represent the community that is affected by the Crossrail hole plot.....
So what is the secret? Is it in any way to do with any ambiguity about what was said in the Khoodeelaar! campaign demand as passed by the meeting held on 22 January 2006?
There could be no ambiguity.
Just for the records, we again publish the main text of the KHOODEELAAR! legal action process service communication about the demand that was sent to the then 'chief executive' in the Tower Hamlets Borough COUNCIL , Christine Gilbert on 25 January 2006.
By©Muhammad Haque .....
Wednesday 25 January 2006
To
Christine Gilbert
Chief Executive
And
Owen Whalley
Head of Major Project Development
London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council
Mulberry Place
5 Clove Crescent
London E14 2BG
Dear Ms Gilbert and Mr Whalley
Subject Khoodeelaar campaign meeting –
Demand 22 January 2006 –
The texts [2] sent by fax 25 Jan 2006
1. You both have been sent this morning the main texts of the KHOODEELAAR!
campaign resolution as delivered and agreed at the meeting on 22 January 2006 held [at the Brady centre, 192 Hanbury street London E1] in the evening of Sunday 22 January 2006 demanding that the London borough of tower hamlets council pass a single motion as their resolution against the Crossrail hole plan/bill as it is in the uk house of commons now and that they do so in the next 11 days and that the resolution be put to the uk parliament and to the uk secretary of state transport department [Department for Transport= ‘DfT’] and that the resolution be phrased and drafted in an unambiguous unequivocal way accurately truthfully reflecting and representing the demand of the community.
2. Mr Owen Whalley has been sent the copy – and is being sent this further amplifier and clarifier – because of the central role he has been playing (as the published documents of the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council suggest) in the promotion of the Crossrail hole scheme/project/bill as far as the ‘development’ of the Crossrail ‘project’ for the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council goes. He has been sent the material also in order for him to be in receipt of what the community has demanded and what he as the designated employee on ‘Crossrail’ in the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council has to do so that the community’s lawful and urgent demand is seen to be recognised and implemented by the relevant employees in the council on every relevant occasion.
3. As the same campaign meeting [22 January 2006] also agreed the taking of legal action in the event that tower hamlets council fail to implement the demand, you both are most certainly going to be included as parties in any such action and so you are being sent this in our voluntary compliance with the requirements of natural justice, due process [and other related concepts] and the civil procedure rules.
4. The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in defence of the BRICK LANE London E1 AREA and against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project/bill is able to confirm to you both today Wednesday 25 January 2006 that we shall include additional demands for the very detailed legal and democratic and economic accountability from the council over any additional costs that tower hamlets council is caused to be embroiled in or involved in or engaged in - whether in any further attempt/s on the parts of those who have access to the finances and the ‘powers’ and the contacts of the London borough of tower hamlets council to justify their roles and their promotions of the Crossrail hole project or in any further unreasonable, irresponsible, improper, undemocratic, antisocial and or ill-conceived egotistic bid/s in defiance of the very clearly expressed demands of the local community and or in defiance of the campaigning organisations representing the fears, needs and demands of the local community against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project/bill and you both shall be included in any list of witnesses who will be asked to give evidence on their own roles and the origins of any orders or decisions that caused them to play the parts that you found yourselves playing in defiance of the local community’s clear demand against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project Bill. 5. Ms Christine Gilbert has been put on notice since the first quarter of 2004 when the chair of the CBRUK organisation (which politically organised the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign during that same period in 2004) initiated the first series of extensive questions which were drafted and put to her concerning the role she had played in advising and or working with or in carrying out the actual intentions of any controlling group member of the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council on the Crossrail hole scheme/project/scheme. She has failed to date to deal with those questions and despite two recent [final] reminders has continued to fail or refuse to answer the outstanding questions. She has also failed to provide any lawful or reasonable explanation or lawful justification for her conduct and role concerned in the context of the KHOODEELAAR campaign demands, questions and representations.
6. The statements that have been published in the past two weeks in the name of or by the uses and abuses of the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council as the corporate entity and about the Crossrail hole bill have contained more than one contradictory assertion and allusion to alleged facts thus creating new grounds for the community to be able to claim that ‘the TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL’ in general and the identifiable ‘controlling group’ councillors are carrying on conducting themselves in defiance of or in conflict with the wishes and the interests of the local community concerned.
7. The KHOODEELAAR campaign is able to confirm to both ms Christine Gilbert and Mr Owen Whalley that this communication dated and transmitted on Wednesday 25 January 2006 is being made to both of them as a very last attempt at helping the controlling persons involved in the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council over the Crossrail hole scheme/project/ bill avoid placing or pushing the corporate entity of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council and its resources in a very costly confrontation with the community in the East End
8. Mr Owen Whalley’s circular ‘to all members’ of the TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL dated 19 September 2005 contains a misleading statement that is of crucial relevance to us and which statement as put to the meeting of 22 January 2006 and was loudly and clearly rejected by the meeting. That statement is in the last sentence in paragraph two of the circular (‘the petition also makes explicit the council’s opposition to an intervention shaft in Hanbury Street and preference for its relocation to Woodseer Street’.)
9. The meaning of the phrase ‘misleading statement’ in this context is any statement that contradicts the community’s opposition to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail hole, to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail shaft tunnel, to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail hole in THE BRICK LANE London E1 AREA and in any other part of THE London BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS. This is the position as expressed by the public meeting in support of the KHOODEELAAR campaign held at the Brady centre on Sunday 22 January 2006.
This takes into account the KHOODEELAAR CAMPAIGN'S remit which recognises the rights of the people in the Mile End area that is also affected by the known Crossrail plans.
10. The KHOODEELAAR campaign is able to confirm that it will treat this document and communication [25 January 2006] as being a reasonable final comprehensive advice, notice and representation to the two most relevant employees in the LBTH =London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council - council of the community’s simple and straightforward demand and position on the role of the LBTH Council in the matter of the Crossrail hole project/scheme/ Bill and of the task that the community has asked the LBTH Council to carry out within the specified time by passing the resolution and then making the same resolution available to the MPs select committee currently sitting to formally consider the relevant aspects of the Crossrail hole Bill [‘the Crossrail Bill’ or the ‘Crossrail hybrid Bill’] in time so that there is no frustration of the community’s wish in the remainder of the process of legislation involved.
KHOODEELAAR campaign demand 22 January 2006 and follow-up legal notice to Christine Gilbert and Owen Whalley concluded at 1436 Hrs GMT on Wednesday 25 January 2006”
Friday, May 30, 2008
Gordon Brown can still avoid being sunk in unconstitutionality by letting Parliament actually SCRUTINISE the flawed, wasteful ‘Crossrail Bill’.
Gordon Brown can still avoid being sunk in unconstitutionality by letting Parliament actually SCRUTINISE the flawed, wasteful ‘Crossrail Bill’.
By©Muhammad Haque
2225 Hrs GMT
London
Friday 30 May 2008
Gordon Brown can still avoid being sunk in unconstitutionality by acting constitutionally and by letting Parliament actually SCRUTINISE the flawed, wasteful ‘Crossrail Bill’.
Even at this stage!
Has Gordon Brown got what it takes?
Instead of cold calling people at AM - or any other time - Brown should pay heed to the communities across the land and behave in accordance with the overwhelming cry for decent standards. Brown should scrap the superfluous, wasteful and plainly thieving hordes of time-servers, reduce the size of the quangos and actually attack the corruptocracy... that Tony Blair with Brown’s collusion, set up If Brown can do these things that most decent and genuine opinion wants to be done by the ‘Government’ then he can still turn things around and stay in office with credibility...
As the Khoodeelaar! campaign has shown time and again, the Crossrail hole scam is not the right answer to the transport needs of London.
Gordon Brown ha got to drop phrases like ‘big infrastructure projects’. He should start to think, talk about and act talk about the needs. And the standards, And the values...
Brown should also encourage something new. Something that I have been calling for ..... And something that most democratic opinion in this country - and beyond - will appreciate.
Can Brown show that he is for a genuinely vibrant season of accountability of the Executive by Parliament?
Will he show this by setting in motion an overdue scrutiny of the Crossrail Bill?
Below is one of the dozens of pieces that I have written and published in the past year showing the need to let Parliament, behave as a scrutinising.....
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
2225 Hrs GMT
London
Friday 30 May 2008
Gordon Brown can still avoid being sunk in unconstitutionality by acting constitutionally and by letting Parliament actually SCRUTINISE the flawed, wasteful ‘Crossrail Bill’.
Even at this stage!
Has Gordon Brown got what it takes?
Instead of cold calling people at AM - or any other time - Brown should pay heed to the communities across the land and behave in accordance with the overwhelming cry for decent standards. Brown should scrap the superfluous, wasteful and plainly thieving hordes of time-servers, reduce the size of the quangos and actually attack the corruptocracy... that Tony Blair with Brown’s collusion, set up If Brown can do these things that most decent and genuine opinion wants to be done by the ‘Government’ then he can still turn things around and stay in office with credibility...
As the Khoodeelaar! campaign has shown time and again, the Crossrail hole scam is not the right answer to the transport needs of London.
Gordon Brown ha got to drop phrases like ‘big infrastructure projects’. He should start to think, talk about and act talk about the needs. And the standards, And the values...
Brown should also encourage something new. Something that I have been calling for ..... And something that most democratic opinion in this country - and beyond - will appreciate.
Can Brown show that he is for a genuinely vibrant season of accountability of the Executive by Parliament?
Will he show this by setting in motion an overdue scrutiny of the Crossrail Bill?
Below is one of the dozens of pieces that I have written and published in the past year showing the need to let Parliament, behave as a scrutinising.....
[To be continued]
Gordon Brown can still avoid being sunk in unconstitutionality by acting constitutionally and by letting Parliament actually SCRUTINISE the flawed, wa
By©Muhammad Haque
2225 Hrs GMT
London
Friday 30 May 2008
Gordon Brown can still avoid being sunk in unconstitutionality by acting constitutionally and by letting Parliament actually SCRUTINISE the flawed, wasteful ‘Crossrail Bill’.
Even at this stage!
Has Gordon Brown got what it takes?
Instead of cold calling people at AM - or any other time - Brown should pay heed to the communities across the land and behave in accordance with the overwhelming cry for decent standards. Brown should scrap the superfluous, wasteful and plainly thieving hordes of time-servers, reduce the size of the quangos and actually attack the corruptocracy... that Tony Blair with Brown’s collusion, set up If Brown can do these things that most decent and genuine opinion wants to be done by the ‘Government’ then he can still turn things around and stay in office with credibility...
As the Khoodeelaar! campaign has shown time and again, the Crossrail hole scam is not the right answer to the transport needs of London.
Gordon Brown ha got to drop phrases like ‘big infrastructure projects’. He should start to think, talk about and act talk about the needs. And the standards, And the values...
Brown should also encourage something new. Something that I have been calling for ..... And something that most democratic opinion in this country - and beyond - will appreciate.
Can Brown show that he is for a genuinely vibrant season of accountability of the Executive by Parliament?
Will he show this by setting in motion an overdue scrutiny of the Crossrail Bill?
Below is one of the dozens of pieces that I have written and published in the past year showing the need to let Parliament, behave as a scrutinising.....
[To be continued]
2225 Hrs GMT
London
Friday 30 May 2008
Gordon Brown can still avoid being sunk in unconstitutionality by acting constitutionally and by letting Parliament actually SCRUTINISE the flawed, wasteful ‘Crossrail Bill’.
Even at this stage!
Has Gordon Brown got what it takes?
Instead of cold calling people at AM - or any other time - Brown should pay heed to the communities across the land and behave in accordance with the overwhelming cry for decent standards. Brown should scrap the superfluous, wasteful and plainly thieving hordes of time-servers, reduce the size of the quangos and actually attack the corruptocracy... that Tony Blair with Brown’s collusion, set up If Brown can do these things that most decent and genuine opinion wants to be done by the ‘Government’ then he can still turn things around and stay in office with credibility...
As the Khoodeelaar! campaign has shown time and again, the Crossrail hole scam is not the right answer to the transport needs of London.
Gordon Brown ha got to drop phrases like ‘big infrastructure projects’. He should start to think, talk about and act talk about the needs. And the standards, And the values...
Brown should also encourage something new. Something that I have been calling for ..... And something that most democratic opinion in this country - and beyond - will appreciate.
Can Brown show that he is for a genuinely vibrant season of accountability of the Executive by Parliament?
Will he show this by setting in motion an overdue scrutiny of the Crossrail Bill?
Below is one of the dozens of pieces that I have written and published in the past year showing the need to let Parliament, behave as a scrutinising.....
[To be continued]
Gordon Brown can still avoid being sunk in the sea of unconstitutionality by acting constitutionally and by letting Parliament actually SCRUTINISE the
By©Muhammad Haque
2225 Hrs GMT
London
Friday 30 May 2008
Gordon Brown can still avoid being sunk in the sea of unconstitutionality by acting constitutionally and by letting Parliament actually SCRUTINISE the seriously flawed, wasteful ‘Crossrail Bill’.
Even at this stage!
Has Gordon Brown got what it takes?
Instead of cold calling people at AM - or any other time - Brown should pay heed to the communities across the land and behave in accordance with the overwhelming cry for decent standards. Brown should scrap the superfluous, wasteful and plainly thieving hordes of time-servers, reduce the size of the quangos and actually attack the corruptocracy... that Tony Blair with Brown’s collusion, set up If Brown can do these things that most decent and genuine opinion wants to be done by the ‘Government’ then he can still turn things around and stay in office with credibility...
As the Khoodeelaar! campaign has shown time and again, the Crossrail hole scam is not the right answer to the transport needs of London.
Gordon Brown ha got to drop phrases like ‘big infrastructure projects’. He should start to think, talk about and act talk about the needs. And the standards, And the values...
Brown should also encourage something new. Something that I have been calling for ..... And something that most democratic opinion in this country - and beyond - will appreciate.
Can Brown show that he is for a genuinely vibrant season of accountability of the Executive by Parliament?
Will he show this by setting in motion an overdue scrutiny of the Crossrail Bill?
Below is one of the dozens of pieces that I have written and published in the past year showing the need to let Parliament, behave as a scrutinising.....
[To be continued]
[To be continued]
"
This is the latest confirmation of the NORM of the widespread abuse of Parliament and constitutionality by the executive in the UK. Either there is rule of law or there is not. Where have the opposition spokespeople been?
Why hasn't there been ANY move by the mainstream Opposition in the ˜elected' House of Commons to force compliance with the rule of law by the Executive?
Why haven THEY been the applicants for this judicial review of the highly corrupt behaviour by the Blairing regime?
This one is in the news because of the High Court action. How many thousands of similarly corrupt deals and decisions are being suppressed as we all hear about this particular one?
You say that Goldsmith is no longer in office. You mean that therefore he is exempt from liability for such an outrageous and open defiance of the rule of law! Is that acceptable? What kind of immunity must be allowed from answering on two of the most damaging violations he has committed against ethics and against constitutionality ?
How is Goldsmith able to get away like this, time after time?
Who are his de facto partners in the grand violations of the constitution?
Muhammad Haque, London, UK
"
"
From Times Online
April 10, 2008
Analysis: what next after High Court ruling on BAE?
Frances Gibb, Legal Editor
When Tony Blair, as Prime Minister, approached the Attorney-General, Lord Goldsmith, QC, to argue the case for the dropping of the corruption investigation into the BAE arms deal, he insisted that it was a matter ultimately for the Government’s chief law officer. But — justifying his approach — Mr Blair said that this was the “clearest case for intervention in the public interest he had seen”.
Today, delivering one of the most damning criticisms of ministers seen in the courts, Lord Justice Moses turned those same words on their head, saying: “We agree.”
The case, he said, was a paramount instance of the need for the courts to intervene and uphold the rule of law; to stand firm in the face of a threat and say the threat should have been resisted.
In doing so, the judge, sitting with Mr Justice Sullilvan, did not mince his words. Ministers, including the Prime Minister, had advised the Attorney-General and the Director of the Serious Fraud Office — then Robert Wardle — that to continue the investigation would have grave consequences, both for the arms trade and the safety of British citizens and service personnel. In light of what he regarded as a grave risk to life, the SFO director halted the investigation.
RELATED LINKS
Dropping Saudi-BAE bribery probe 'unlawful'
His decision was challenged by the Corner House Research and Campaign Against the Arms Trade. Defending its position, the SFO argued that its director was entitled to surrender to the threat and said that the court should accept that, while a matter of “regret”, such threats were a “part of life”.
Today Lord Justice Moses and Mr Justice Sullivan unequivocally rejected that view: “so bleak a picture of the impotence of the law invites at least dismay, if not outrage”, Lord Justice Moses said. In a series of caustic comments he affirmed the importance of the courts in standing up for the law and savaged the SFO director for acting unlawfully in “buckling” to threats. Those threats, he said, had been aimed at this country’s legal system.
He said: “It is difficult to identify any integrity in the role of the courts to uphold the rule of law, if the courts are to abdicate in response to a threat from a foreign power.”
And: “We fear for the administration of justice if it can be perverted by a threat.”
He concluded: “No one, whether within this country or outside, is entitled to interfere with the course of justice.”
So what now? The SFO is considering the judgment, and could of course appeal. The Government is likely to fight tooth and nail to resist any pressure that it re-open an investigation that could damage Saudi relations — commercially, diplomatically and above all in terms of counter-terrorism intelligence.
As the judgment stands, it is likely that the SFO would have at least to revisit its decision to halt the inquiry. Whether that would mean that it came to another conclusion and reopened the whole investigation is another matter.
A fresh case would be made as to the likely damage to security and terrorism; and this time there could be no argument as to the loss of what the Government called “the largest export contract” in the past decade, the procurement of the next generation of attack aircraft — the Typhoon — because the deal is done.
As for the law officers: Lord Goldsmith has already gone from office, as has the SFO director, Robert Wardle, who will be gone in ten days' time. But the SFO’s reputation is severely damaged. Although it now has a new director, he will have a job on his hands to restore it.
As for relations between ministers and the Attorney-General, Lord Goldsmith’s legacy — not least because of BAE — was to prompt a review. His successor, Baroness Scotland of Asthal, QC, has succeeded in fighting of calls for the role to be reformed significantly. Some may now think that decision by ministers premature.
HAVE YOUR SAY
Is it a crime to damage a good business releationship between Saudi Arabia and UK PLC?
Perhaps it is not good business etiquite but at least the UK leaders do not tell downright lies on the world stage as in some other "sort of" English speaking countries. Is this not just a simple case of sour grapes?
T mOORE, GOSPORT, UK
They're all guilty but what can anyone do about it?
paul, poole, gb
It is commendable that something like this involving bribery and threats from another country has been brought into the public domain. But how many times has it happened and we hear nothing of it?
What now for UK/Saudi relations? Are they far from Iraq...
Brett Sinclair, monaco,
Perverting the course of justice. As clear a case as there can be, and no-one is denying it. Surely then, Tony Blair has committed a crime.
Loosehead, Basingstoke,
This is the latest confirmation of the NORM of the widespread abuse of Parliament and constitutionality by the executive in the UK. Either there is rule of law or there is not. Where have the opposition spokespeople been? Why hasn’t there been ANY move by the mainstream Opposition in the ‘elected’ House of Commons to force compliance with the rule of law by the Executive?
Why haven THEY been the applicants for this judicial review of the highly corrupt behaviour by the Blairing regime?
This one is in the news because of the High Court action. How many thousands of similarly corrupt deals and decisions are being suppressed as we all hear about this particular one?
You say that Goldsmith is no longer in office. You mean that therefore he is exempt from liability for such an outrageous and open defiance of the rule of law! Is that acceptable? What kind of immunity must be allowed from answering on two of the most damaging violations he has committed against ethics and against constitutionality ?
How is Goldsmith able to get away like this, time after time?
Who are his de facto partners in the grand violations of the constitution?
Muhammad Haque, London, UK
"
2225 Hrs GMT
London
Friday 30 May 2008
Gordon Brown can still avoid being sunk in the sea of unconstitutionality by acting constitutionally and by letting Parliament actually SCRUTINISE the seriously flawed, wasteful ‘Crossrail Bill’.
Even at this stage!
Has Gordon Brown got what it takes?
Instead of cold calling people at AM - or any other time - Brown should pay heed to the communities across the land and behave in accordance with the overwhelming cry for decent standards. Brown should scrap the superfluous, wasteful and plainly thieving hordes of time-servers, reduce the size of the quangos and actually attack the corruptocracy... that Tony Blair with Brown’s collusion, set up If Brown can do these things that most decent and genuine opinion wants to be done by the ‘Government’ then he can still turn things around and stay in office with credibility...
As the Khoodeelaar! campaign has shown time and again, the Crossrail hole scam is not the right answer to the transport needs of London.
Gordon Brown ha got to drop phrases like ‘big infrastructure projects’. He should start to think, talk about and act talk about the needs. And the standards, And the values...
Brown should also encourage something new. Something that I have been calling for ..... And something that most democratic opinion in this country - and beyond - will appreciate.
Can Brown show that he is for a genuinely vibrant season of accountability of the Executive by Parliament?
Will he show this by setting in motion an overdue scrutiny of the Crossrail Bill?
Below is one of the dozens of pieces that I have written and published in the past year showing the need to let Parliament, behave as a scrutinising.....
[To be continued]
[To be continued]
"
This is the latest confirmation of the NORM of the widespread abuse of Parliament and constitutionality by the executive in the UK. Either there is rule of law or there is not. Where have the opposition spokespeople been?
Why hasn't there been ANY move by the mainstream Opposition in the ˜elected' House of Commons to force compliance with the rule of law by the Executive?
Why haven THEY been the applicants for this judicial review of the highly corrupt behaviour by the Blairing regime?
This one is in the news because of the High Court action. How many thousands of similarly corrupt deals and decisions are being suppressed as we all hear about this particular one?
You say that Goldsmith is no longer in office. You mean that therefore he is exempt from liability for such an outrageous and open defiance of the rule of law! Is that acceptable? What kind of immunity must be allowed from answering on two of the most damaging violations he has committed against ethics and against constitutionality ?
How is Goldsmith able to get away like this, time after time?
Who are his de facto partners in the grand violations of the constitution?
Muhammad Haque, London, UK
"
"
From Times Online
April 10, 2008
Analysis: what next after High Court ruling on BAE?
Frances Gibb, Legal Editor
When Tony Blair, as Prime Minister, approached the Attorney-General, Lord Goldsmith, QC, to argue the case for the dropping of the corruption investigation into the BAE arms deal, he insisted that it was a matter ultimately for the Government’s chief law officer. But — justifying his approach — Mr Blair said that this was the “clearest case for intervention in the public interest he had seen”.
Today, delivering one of the most damning criticisms of ministers seen in the courts, Lord Justice Moses turned those same words on their head, saying: “We agree.”
The case, he said, was a paramount instance of the need for the courts to intervene and uphold the rule of law; to stand firm in the face of a threat and say the threat should have been resisted.
In doing so, the judge, sitting with Mr Justice Sullilvan, did not mince his words. Ministers, including the Prime Minister, had advised the Attorney-General and the Director of the Serious Fraud Office — then Robert Wardle — that to continue the investigation would have grave consequences, both for the arms trade and the safety of British citizens and service personnel. In light of what he regarded as a grave risk to life, the SFO director halted the investigation.
RELATED LINKS
Dropping Saudi-BAE bribery probe 'unlawful'
His decision was challenged by the Corner House Research and Campaign Against the Arms Trade. Defending its position, the SFO argued that its director was entitled to surrender to the threat and said that the court should accept that, while a matter of “regret”, such threats were a “part of life”.
Today Lord Justice Moses and Mr Justice Sullivan unequivocally rejected that view: “so bleak a picture of the impotence of the law invites at least dismay, if not outrage”, Lord Justice Moses said. In a series of caustic comments he affirmed the importance of the courts in standing up for the law and savaged the SFO director for acting unlawfully in “buckling” to threats. Those threats, he said, had been aimed at this country’s legal system.
He said: “It is difficult to identify any integrity in the role of the courts to uphold the rule of law, if the courts are to abdicate in response to a threat from a foreign power.”
And: “We fear for the administration of justice if it can be perverted by a threat.”
He concluded: “No one, whether within this country or outside, is entitled to interfere with the course of justice.”
So what now? The SFO is considering the judgment, and could of course appeal. The Government is likely to fight tooth and nail to resist any pressure that it re-open an investigation that could damage Saudi relations — commercially, diplomatically and above all in terms of counter-terrorism intelligence.
As the judgment stands, it is likely that the SFO would have at least to revisit its decision to halt the inquiry. Whether that would mean that it came to another conclusion and reopened the whole investigation is another matter.
A fresh case would be made as to the likely damage to security and terrorism; and this time there could be no argument as to the loss of what the Government called “the largest export contract” in the past decade, the procurement of the next generation of attack aircraft — the Typhoon — because the deal is done.
As for the law officers: Lord Goldsmith has already gone from office, as has the SFO director, Robert Wardle, who will be gone in ten days' time. But the SFO’s reputation is severely damaged. Although it now has a new director, he will have a job on his hands to restore it.
As for relations between ministers and the Attorney-General, Lord Goldsmith’s legacy — not least because of BAE — was to prompt a review. His successor, Baroness Scotland of Asthal, QC, has succeeded in fighting of calls for the role to be reformed significantly. Some may now think that decision by ministers premature.
HAVE YOUR SAY
Is it a crime to damage a good business releationship between Saudi Arabia and UK PLC?
Perhaps it is not good business etiquite but at least the UK leaders do not tell downright lies on the world stage as in some other "sort of" English speaking countries. Is this not just a simple case of sour grapes?
T mOORE, GOSPORT, UK
They're all guilty but what can anyone do about it?
paul, poole, gb
It is commendable that something like this involving bribery and threats from another country has been brought into the public domain. But how many times has it happened and we hear nothing of it?
What now for UK/Saudi relations? Are they far from Iraq...
Brett Sinclair, monaco,
Perverting the course of justice. As clear a case as there can be, and no-one is denying it. Surely then, Tony Blair has committed a crime.
Loosehead, Basingstoke,
This is the latest confirmation of the NORM of the widespread abuse of Parliament and constitutionality by the executive in the UK. Either there is rule of law or there is not. Where have the opposition spokespeople been? Why hasn’t there been ANY move by the mainstream Opposition in the ‘elected’ House of Commons to force compliance with the rule of law by the Executive?
Why haven THEY been the applicants for this judicial review of the highly corrupt behaviour by the Blairing regime?
This one is in the news because of the High Court action. How many thousands of similarly corrupt deals and decisions are being suppressed as we all hear about this particular one?
You say that Goldsmith is no longer in office. You mean that therefore he is exempt from liability for such an outrageous and open defiance of the rule of law! Is that acceptable? What kind of immunity must be allowed from answering on two of the most damaging violations he has committed against ethics and against constitutionality ?
How is Goldsmith able to get away like this, time after time?
Who are his de facto partners in the grand violations of the constitution?
Muhammad Haque, London, UK
"
Khoodeelaar! campaign against Crossrail hole QUESTIONS to Tower Hamlets Council...
Khoodeelaar! campaign against Crossrail hole QUESTIONS to Tower Hamlets Council...
Editor©Muhammad Haque
1635 GMT
London
Friday 30 may 2008
These began to be put to the Tower Hamlets Council in February 2004.
We have continued the interrogative communications for the 53 months that have followed.
There have been no answers to the questions.
There have been some utterances that have contained some references to aspects only of our questions. But there have been no answers.
How could that be?
the clique that has been in control of the Council - the clique about which there has been no 'news', 'comment' 'letter' in the ‘local’ ‘newspaper’ the EAST LONDON IDIOTISER except in the one off piece by KHOODEELAAR! published in the IDIOTISER during 2007 - has a lot to hide. It is not a legitimate grouping. It is an illegitimate grouping made up of un-elected personnel which dictates the policy to the formally and the actually elected personnel. The controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council not answerable to any legitimate, independent, objective forum or indeed to the people at large in the Borough
The ‘outside’ forum or the local newspaper’ as typified by the ‘East London Idiotiser’ do not raise any questions about that clique.
There is thus an agenda to keep Tower Hamlets corrupt. By all the ‘formal and the de facto agencies’ that make their trade in the name of the ordinary people of the area known as ‘the London Borough of Tower Hamlets’.
This then makes the cause and the case for accountability that much harder to make.
As we shall show in our next examination of the role that the ‘East London Idiotiser’ has been performing for the apparent benefit of ‘Denise Jones’ ‘as leader’...
[To be continued]
Editor©Muhammad Haque
1635 GMT
London
Friday 30 may 2008
These began to be put to the Tower Hamlets Council in February 2004.
We have continued the interrogative communications for the 53 months that have followed.
There have been no answers to the questions.
There have been some utterances that have contained some references to aspects only of our questions. But there have been no answers.
How could that be?
the clique that has been in control of the Council - the clique about which there has been no 'news', 'comment' 'letter' in the ‘local’ ‘newspaper’ the EAST LONDON IDIOTISER except in the one off piece by KHOODEELAAR! published in the IDIOTISER during 2007 - has a lot to hide. It is not a legitimate grouping. It is an illegitimate grouping made up of un-elected personnel which dictates the policy to the formally and the actually elected personnel. The controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council not answerable to any legitimate, independent, objective forum or indeed to the people at large in the Borough
The ‘outside’ forum or the local newspaper’ as typified by the ‘East London Idiotiser’ do not raise any questions about that clique.
There is thus an agenda to keep Tower Hamlets corrupt. By all the ‘formal and the de facto agencies’ that make their trade in the name of the ordinary people of the area known as ‘the London Borough of Tower Hamlets’.
This then makes the cause and the case for accountability that much harder to make.
As we shall show in our next examination of the role that the ‘East London Idiotiser’ has been performing for the apparent benefit of ‘Denise Jones’ ‘as leader’...
[To be continued]
When the inner city, 'most deprived' boro’ Tower Hamlets Council is controlled by agents of Big Business, the community can't afford to stand by..
When the inner city, 'most deprived' boro’ Tower Hamlets Council is controlled by agents of Big Business, the community can't afford to stand by..
That is one of the key reasons why the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the CRASSrail hole plot-inviting controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council has been putting so many questions to ‘the Council’.
It is a delicate difference. That between ‘the Council’ and the ‘controlling clique’ on the Council.
Khoodeelaar! ADVOCATES for there to be a legitimate, an honest, a competent, representative and accountable Council that looks after and looks out for the whole community.
That is why we make the distinction between what ought to be. And what in fact is.
That is why we have maintained all along the ethical practice of not naming employees of the Council. Except Owen Whalley and Christine Gilbert. So far.
If we referred to any other employe, that would be only a continuation of already published sources.
As an ethical rule of our own, Khoodeelaar! campaign does not want to see the distinction disappear.
That is our ethical record and position. And our ethical policy.
Does the controlling clique respect the ethics?
Or any ethics?
We shall be updating on the evidence of the controlling clique’s misconduct in promoting the Crassrail hole agenda.
And in the evidence, it will be seen just how lacking i ethics, morality and accountability the controlling clique is, has been. And continues to remain...
And why it is even more necessary now than before that the community campaign against the misrepresentation by Tower Hamlets Council il controlling clique is kept up...
[To be continued]
That is one of the key reasons why the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the CRASSrail hole plot-inviting controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council has been putting so many questions to ‘the Council’.
It is a delicate difference. That between ‘the Council’ and the ‘controlling clique’ on the Council.
Khoodeelaar! ADVOCATES for there to be a legitimate, an honest, a competent, representative and accountable Council that looks after and looks out for the whole community.
That is why we make the distinction between what ought to be. And what in fact is.
That is why we have maintained all along the ethical practice of not naming employees of the Council. Except Owen Whalley and Christine Gilbert. So far.
If we referred to any other employe, that would be only a continuation of already published sources.
As an ethical rule of our own, Khoodeelaar! campaign does not want to see the distinction disappear.
That is our ethical record and position. And our ethical policy.
Does the controlling clique respect the ethics?
Or any ethics?
We shall be updating on the evidence of the controlling clique’s misconduct in promoting the Crassrail hole agenda.
And in the evidence, it will be seen just how lacking i ethics, morality and accountability the controlling clique is, has been. And continues to remain...
And why it is even more necessary now than before that the community campaign against the misrepresentation by Tower Hamlets Council il controlling clique is kept up...
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! campaign against Crossrail searched in vain for evidence of opposition in UK Parliament....We had to cite Cromwell..!
1510 Hrs GMT 1610 Hrs UK Time London Friday 30 May 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot UPDATE on Friday 30 May 2008 shows up the charade that is the UK Houses of Parliament..... As seen in the willing servility to the executive as exhibited in the behaviour of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ ‘select committee ‘ fronted by the place man Alan Meale and his ‘opposition’ [what ‘opposition’] place men and place women ....
As Khoodeelaar! had predicted in December 2005, within hours of the announcement being made that a ‘select committee’ had been set up, there was no chance in a million years that the ‘select committee’ would allow the evidence against Crossrail to be put on the record before the committee. As we also correctly predicted, the ‘ Crossrail Bill’ ‘select committee’ in the UK House of Commons that had just been announced [December 2005] would behave like a stooge committee.
As it in fact did. And we then predicted, in November 2007 when we first became directly involved in communications wit the part of the ‘House of Lords’ concerned with the ‘Crossrail Bill’] that UNLESS some members of the ‘House of Lords’ [what an affront to all of us who do not consider any human being to be worthy of being called a lord!] showed by their conduct that they UNDERSTOOD what the duties of a constitutionally active legislative Upper chamber of a democratic and accountable Parliament had to do and UNLESS they did accordingly and constitutionally and unless they behaved in manifestly honest, intellectually competent, ethically transparent, objectively independent way,,, they would discredit the ‘case for the House of Lords’... We went on to give them support, encouragement and advice...
We did so in our direct communications as addressed to the bureaucracy set up ‘ within the House of Lords’ for the purpose of ‘the formal treatment of the Crossrail Bill’. As we did in published comments including in those carried in particular on the Times newspaper web site....
And we did so for the simple purpose of backing the movement for democracy in the UK, the movement for accountability in and via Parliament to the people, and in the particular case on the CRASSLY conceived, Big Business-agenda Crossrail scam. And we called for an end to the wasteful plot via Crossrail that was just afoot.... in the ‘Upper House’, ‘ via’ the ‘Upper House’..... We also examined the history of the ‘House of Lords’.. and we referred to Oliver Cromwell... and said that so dire, so empty, so barren has been the field of formally instituted opposition in and via parliament in britain that we looked in vain over records of centuries to find any significant acton that was taken to bring the illegitimate elements that made up the ‘House of Lords’ to book.... as it were... We did all of this in order to tell the servile time servers that we were NOT impressed by their records generally and that unless they showed they were willing to tell the truth about the people’s serious objections against Crossrail they, the ‘House of Lords’ members concerned would go down as contributing yet more to discredit the already largely illegitimate and discredited ‘House’.. And so they have done..... [To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot UPDATE on Friday 30 May 2008 shows up the charade that is the UK Houses of Parliament..... As seen in the willing servility to the executive as exhibited in the behaviour of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ ‘select committee ‘ fronted by the place man Alan Meale and his ‘opposition’ [what ‘opposition’] place men and place women ....
As Khoodeelaar! had predicted in December 2005, within hours of the announcement being made that a ‘select committee’ had been set up, there was no chance in a million years that the ‘select committee’ would allow the evidence against Crossrail to be put on the record before the committee. As we also correctly predicted, the ‘ Crossrail Bill’ ‘select committee’ in the UK House of Commons that had just been announced [December 2005] would behave like a stooge committee.
As it in fact did. And we then predicted, in November 2007 when we first became directly involved in communications wit the part of the ‘House of Lords’ concerned with the ‘Crossrail Bill’] that UNLESS some members of the ‘House of Lords’ [what an affront to all of us who do not consider any human being to be worthy of being called a lord!] showed by their conduct that they UNDERSTOOD what the duties of a constitutionally active legislative Upper chamber of a democratic and accountable Parliament had to do and UNLESS they did accordingly and constitutionally and unless they behaved in manifestly honest, intellectually competent, ethically transparent, objectively independent way,,, they would discredit the ‘case for the House of Lords’... We went on to give them support, encouragement and advice...
We did so in our direct communications as addressed to the bureaucracy set up ‘ within the House of Lords’ for the purpose of ‘the formal treatment of the Crossrail Bill’. As we did in published comments including in those carried in particular on the Times newspaper web site....
And we did so for the simple purpose of backing the movement for democracy in the UK, the movement for accountability in and via Parliament to the people, and in the particular case on the CRASSLY conceived, Big Business-agenda Crossrail scam. And we called for an end to the wasteful plot via Crossrail that was just afoot.... in the ‘Upper House’, ‘ via’ the ‘Upper House’..... We also examined the history of the ‘House of Lords’.. and we referred to Oliver Cromwell... and said that so dire, so empty, so barren has been the field of formally instituted opposition in and via parliament in britain that we looked in vain over records of centuries to find any significant acton that was taken to bring the illegitimate elements that made up the ‘House of Lords’ to book.... as it were... We did all of this in order to tell the servile time servers that we were NOT impressed by their records generally and that unless they showed they were willing to tell the truth about the people’s serious objections against Crossrail they, the ‘House of Lords’ members concerned would go down as contributing yet more to discredit the already largely illegitimate and discredited ‘House’.. And so they have done..... [To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! campaign against Crossrail hole Bill points out the absence in the UK of a line of accountability to the public by public decision makers
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail! Khoodeelaar! No to wasteful Crossrail!
Khoodeelaar! No to unaccountable Crossrail hole plot scam! Khoodeelaar! No to unconstitutionality in the UK Parliament! Khoodeelaar! No to unconstitutional conduct by the so-called quasi-judicial unjudicial sub-bureaucracy set up under the banner of parliament....
Khoodeelaar! the campaign against additional impoverishment to the inner city East End that as plotted to be perpetrated via Crossrail hole scam...
The exchange of blame that has been taking place over the past 30 hours between ‘Network Rail’ and the Transport for London bureaucracy over the Brick Lane bridge collapse - note that phrase, ‘Brick Lane bridge collapse’ , because ALL the ‘media’ are omitting the name ‘Brick Lane’ where the actual collapse happened on wednesday night - illustrates the ‘tradition’ of negligence and lack of accountability on the parts of those responsible for the work....
The ‘tradition’ is to do with the fact that overall, there no clear line of accountability for public service management... ‘Public’ is used here in the widest possible sense, whether wholly ‘owned’ by the state or partly owned by the state...
There is no direct port of call for the public, ordinary people, passengers, users and fees-and-tax-and-fare-payers holding those responsible for any mishap or accident or disaster to account....This lack of accountability institutionally is a feature of the UK which is allegedly to have had a continuous democratic parliament for the longest period .....
.What does that Parliament actually do? What does it deliver? When MPs are being only derided as thieves and crooks ... where TonY blair partly left office not because of Gordon Brown’s undermining him but because Blair in office had become discredited due to the fact that he was linked with sleaze... cash for honours... cash for access....When the ‘legislative’ [what a joke] ‘House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ ‘met’ to ‘hear objections’ [ooops! ‘petitions.]
Khoodeelaar! NO to corruption in Parliament... No to Corrupt conduct via Crossrail hole Bill 'Select Committee' in the 'House of Lords'... Exposing the open, brazen lies that they told for Big Business and for suppressing the basic right to put forward evidence of the crassness of Crossrail hole scam... How the 'legislative' 'House of Lords' 'select committee' was a stooge committee, how it was used as a stooge outfit to peddle the lies for Big Business... How the Big Business, Bechtel-craved, wasteful, obsolete, City of London-peddled Crossrail hole plot-backers took over the bureaucracy in the UK Parliament....
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! No to unaccountable Crossrail hole plot scam! Khoodeelaar! No to unconstitutionality in the UK Parliament! Khoodeelaar! No to unconstitutional conduct by the so-called quasi-judicial unjudicial sub-bureaucracy set up under the banner of parliament....
Khoodeelaar! the campaign against additional impoverishment to the inner city East End that as plotted to be perpetrated via Crossrail hole scam...
The exchange of blame that has been taking place over the past 30 hours between ‘Network Rail’ and the Transport for London bureaucracy over the Brick Lane bridge collapse - note that phrase, ‘Brick Lane bridge collapse’ , because ALL the ‘media’ are omitting the name ‘Brick Lane’ where the actual collapse happened on wednesday night - illustrates the ‘tradition’ of negligence and lack of accountability on the parts of those responsible for the work....
The ‘tradition’ is to do with the fact that overall, there no clear line of accountability for public service management... ‘Public’ is used here in the widest possible sense, whether wholly ‘owned’ by the state or partly owned by the state...
There is no direct port of call for the public, ordinary people, passengers, users and fees-and-tax-and-fare-payers holding those responsible for any mishap or accident or disaster to account....This lack of accountability institutionally is a feature of the UK which is allegedly to have had a continuous democratic parliament for the longest period .....
.What does that Parliament actually do? What does it deliver? When MPs are being only derided as thieves and crooks ... where TonY blair partly left office not because of Gordon Brown’s undermining him but because Blair in office had become discredited due to the fact that he was linked with sleaze... cash for honours... cash for access....When the ‘legislative’ [what a joke] ‘House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ ‘met’ to ‘hear objections’ [ooops! ‘petitions.]
Khoodeelaar! NO to corruption in Parliament... No to Corrupt conduct via Crossrail hole Bill 'Select Committee' in the 'House of Lords'... Exposing the open, brazen lies that they told for Big Business and for suppressing the basic right to put forward evidence of the crassness of Crossrail hole scam... How the 'legislative' 'House of Lords' 'select committee' was a stooge committee, how it was used as a stooge outfit to peddle the lies for Big Business... How the Big Business, Bechtel-craved, wasteful, obsolete, City of London-peddled Crossrail hole plot-backers took over the bureaucracy in the UK Parliament....
[To be continued]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the 'Crossrail Bill' [a Bill in UK Parliament]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SGqe5VQwLHI/AAAAAAAABfc/MEjjMWby2dc/S226/Khoodeelaar!+try+this+logo.gif)
![London [Rupert Murdoched] Times, Wed. 7 May 2008](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitiFRN6uO_MOdYMby0s7ow2zcBaewOKfl3k4QdCPcahu1IKXx6sl7Gs4aO9VrAhN8gQJvYb1a2JnODsTUsMks_LtoZVuqc64whMkMitNKVz1bijPST853uNwRNG8x2PVFl1kqRez8M3b-j/s226/1676149.jpg)
