0615 GMT 0715 UKTime London Sunday 13 July 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole plot agenda …..” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO!
That the Blairing cliques on the London local councils controlled in the name of the former Labour Party by operatives impersonating ‘local councils’ are doing damage to the very local communities in whose name they abuse their positions.What does that abuse mean? For the communities, for individuals, for families in the boroughs affected? And a great deal of disservice, it means bad service. Or no service. How do they do so? How do these get away with misleading the ‘local’ communities?
One of the persistent ways that they do it is by ‘taking advantage’ of the absence of active councillors on the same councils.
As KHOODEELAAR! has reported for the past 55 months since our campaign against Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London began [on 31 January 2004], the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council has been IN A STATE OF POLITICAL AND DEMOCRATIC MORASS in terms of an ‘elected collection of councillors speaking out for and representing the local community’. That morass is getting even worse by the week…
Things are so bad that there is now no ‘official opposition’ on Tower Hamlets Council. Why? Is it because the existing ‘elected councillors’ who belong to allegedly [indeed as alleged!!!] opposition parties all set to ‘defect’ to the controlling ‘grouping’? Not as such. NOT Yet. But there is no opposition. No political opposition… Was that foreseen before the last ‘election’ held in May 2006? KHOODEELAAR! had foreseen that. But the ‘politically active opposition parties who were fielding candidates allegedly against the controlling grouping’ did not want to see the truth. They were also culturally hostile to the idea of a real campaign. They preferred to pretend to be radical, opposition and so on while in fact CRAVING to be in ‘position’…. And the result is that there is no NO POSITION… Politically speaking, democratically speaking, even aesthetically, linguistically, conceptually speaking, there is no POSITION on anything from any alleged opposition… on the Tower Hopeless Council…..Which is why the KHOODEELAAR! campaign is now considering one strategy, that of supporting named candidates at the scheduled council election due next in 2010 …[To be continued]
Saturday, July 12, 2008
NETWORK RAIL has been caught acting as CHEAT WORK rail! As CHEAT WORK Rail is close to 'Crossrail' pluggers, we say: SCRAP CRASSRAIL!
By©Muhammad Haque
0530 GMT
London Sunday 13 July 2008
NETWORK RAIL is involved with ‘Crossrail'. How has it been behaving? Has it been found to have been as callous and unreliable? INDEED.
As the evidence represented in one scandal that has been found in Islington:
NETWORK is CHEATWORK rail. As NETWORK RAIL AND Islington council ‘planning’ staff have been caught [see the full text of the report from an Islington based publication, we reproduced below] CHEATING the community in Islington, we ask again: how much more evidence of corruption should be found before the failing, wasteful outfits are either disposed of or their ‘contracts’ seriously reviewed and then rescinded and done away with? How much more evidence of Council ‘planners’ behaving against transparency and community rights and good finance before they are given the overdue SACK that they deserve? How much more losses must be allowed to be caused to the local environment, the local economy before CHEATWORK RAIL are given the marching orders and stopped from looting the public while the needs of the community are neglected?
[To be continued]
Islington Tribune - by PETER GRUNER
Published: 11 July 2008
Footbridge study was ‘duplicitous’
A CONTROVERSIAL £60,000 feasibility study into a footbridge that could unite communities on either side of King’s Cross station was already “weighted against the scheme” before it was launched, according to claims this week.
Network Rail ruled out the £5million footbridge last month – promised originally in plans for the railway land redevelopment – on the grounds of costs and security complications.
But campaigners argued this week that the original brief for the study was “unneces sarily complicated”.
Islington Labour councillor Paul Convery, chairman of the west area planning committee, accused Network Rail and Camden planners, who provided the brief for the feasibility study, of being “duplicitous”.
He added: “The planners didn’t look at a simple bridge which would have stretched across the station from one side to another and which is what the residents wanted.
“Instead they looked at a complicated version with access to several platforms. Obviously that would have created a security nightmare and be costly. So the whole scheme was dropped.”
* The scheme will be discussed at a meeting by the King’s Cross Rail Group on Thursday at the Blessed Sacrament Church in Copenhagen Street, Barnsbury, at 7pm.
Comment on this article.
0530 GMT
London Sunday 13 July 2008
NETWORK RAIL is involved with ‘Crossrail'. How has it been behaving? Has it been found to have been as callous and unreliable? INDEED.
As the evidence represented in one scandal that has been found in Islington:
NETWORK is CHEATWORK rail. As NETWORK RAIL AND Islington council ‘planning’ staff have been caught [see the full text of the report from an Islington based publication, we reproduced below] CHEATING the community in Islington, we ask again: how much more evidence of corruption should be found before the failing, wasteful outfits are either disposed of or their ‘contracts’ seriously reviewed and then rescinded and done away with? How much more evidence of Council ‘planners’ behaving against transparency and community rights and good finance before they are given the overdue SACK that they deserve? How much more losses must be allowed to be caused to the local environment, the local economy before CHEATWORK RAIL are given the marching orders and stopped from looting the public while the needs of the community are neglected?
[To be continued]
Islington Tribune - by PETER GRUNER
Published: 11 July 2008
Footbridge study was ‘duplicitous’
A CONTROVERSIAL £60,000 feasibility study into a footbridge that could unite communities on either side of King’s Cross station was already “weighted against the scheme” before it was launched, according to claims this week.
Network Rail ruled out the £5million footbridge last month – promised originally in plans for the railway land redevelopment – on the grounds of costs and security complications.
But campaigners argued this week that the original brief for the study was “unneces sarily complicated”.
Islington Labour councillor Paul Convery, chairman of the west area planning committee, accused Network Rail and Camden planners, who provided the brief for the feasibility study, of being “duplicitous”.
He added: “The planners didn’t look at a simple bridge which would have stretched across the station from one side to another and which is what the residents wanted.
“Instead they looked at a complicated version with access to several platforms. Obviously that would have created a security nightmare and be costly. So the whole scheme was dropped.”
* The scheme will be discussed at a meeting by the King’s Cross Rail Group on Thursday at the Blessed Sacrament Church in Copenhagen Street, Barnsbury, at 7pm.
Comment on this article.
NETWORK RAIL has been caught acting as CHEAT WORK rail! As CHEAT WORK Rail is close to 'Crossrail' pluggers, we say: SCRAP CRASSRAIL!
Depriving inner cities, or worse, ADDING to poverty in the inner cities, like Crossrail hole/s, is not the way forward, Gordon!
By©Muhammad Haque
2235 Hrs GMT
London Saturday
12 July 2008
Gordon Brown is defying all reasonable, lawful and constitutional advice, evidence e and warnings to him about his ill-advised ‘commitment to the Crossrail hole plot.
Why is he doing so?
There is no answer in what he has said so far on Crossrail.
As we have been publishing daily, there CAN BE NO EVIDENCE in support of Brown’s commitment to the London Crossrail.
It is a poverty-creating project.
It is at variance with his stated opposition to poverty.
Why then is Brown sticking by Crossrail?
We have to look at other possible causes.
Including his state of mind. We shall go to a psychological site in the next parts.
For this part,w e refer to Zimbabwe and the Sino-Russian veto on sanctions move that the USA and Brown had tabled.
Will Gordon Brown be ‘vindicated’ over the Russian veto ‘freeze’ [as Brown claimed in the House of Commons speech in effect] over the USA-UK move at the Security Council to vote for sanctions against Robert Mugabe-fronted regime? This is a question that has arisen because the Russians used their veto and opposed the USA-UK move to have the sanctions imposed against Zimbabwe.
What the final ‘evidence’ published may show about Gordon Brown’s ‘deal ‘ with Moscow’s Dmitry Medvedev before the security council vote, is not known. Yet. But nobody is waiting for the final evidence to be published before making comments on Gordon Brown’s judgement!.
Despite his ‘diplomatic’ words, alleging unanimity across ‘British politics’ [Hague’s phrase!!!] on the issue of Zimbabwe, the Tory spokesperson on world affairs William Hague has already [during today Saturday 12 July 2008] fuelled speculation into the truth of what actually happened at the G8 summit where Brown allegedly bagged the Russians' support against Mugabe.
Whatever the actual facts, the comments mill is at full spin. So much so that the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been aware of it. Thus asking: how is it that Gordon Brown can be subjected to such intense analysis on everything else but not on CROSSRAIL?
[To be continued]
What exactly is the secret of this ‘eternal unanimity’ [my words] across ‘British politics’ [my, Muhammad HAQUE;s, as different from William Hague’s, phrase!]
"
Islington Tribune - by PETER GRUNER
Published: 11 July 2008
Footbridge study was ‘duplicitous’
A CONTROVERSIAL £60,000 feasibility study into a footbridge that could unite communities on either side of King’s Cross station was already “weighted against the scheme” before it was launched, according to claims this week.
Network Rail ruled out the £5million footbridge last month – promised originally in plans for the railway land redevelopment – on the grounds of costs and security complications.
But campaigners argued this week that the original brief for the study was “unneces sarily complicated”.
Islington Labour councillor Paul Convery, chairman of the west area planning committee, accused Network Rail and Camden planners, who provided the brief for the feasibility study, of being “duplicitous”.
He added: “The planners didn’t look at a simple bridge which would have stretched across the station from one side to another and which is what the residents wanted.
“Instead they looked at a complicated version with access to several platforms. Obviously that would have created a security nightmare and be costly. So the whole scheme was dropped.”
* The scheme will be discussed at a meeting by the King’s Cross Rail Group on Thursday at the Blessed Sacrament Church in Copenhagen Street, Barnsbury, at 7pm.
Comment on this article.
"
By©Muhammad Haque
2235 Hrs GMT
London Saturday
12 July 2008
Gordon Brown is defying all reasonable, lawful and constitutional advice, evidence e and warnings to him about his ill-advised ‘commitment to the Crossrail hole plot.
Why is he doing so?
There is no answer in what he has said so far on Crossrail.
As we have been publishing daily, there CAN BE NO EVIDENCE in support of Brown’s commitment to the London Crossrail.
It is a poverty-creating project.
It is at variance with his stated opposition to poverty.
Why then is Brown sticking by Crossrail?
We have to look at other possible causes.
Including his state of mind. We shall go to a psychological site in the next parts.
For this part,w e refer to Zimbabwe and the Sino-Russian veto on sanctions move that the USA and Brown had tabled.
Will Gordon Brown be ‘vindicated’ over the Russian veto ‘freeze’ [as Brown claimed in the House of Commons speech in effect] over the USA-UK move at the Security Council to vote for sanctions against Robert Mugabe-fronted regime? This is a question that has arisen because the Russians used their veto and opposed the USA-UK move to have the sanctions imposed against Zimbabwe.
What the final ‘evidence’ published may show about Gordon Brown’s ‘deal ‘ with Moscow’s Dmitry Medvedev before the security council vote, is not known. Yet. But nobody is waiting for the final evidence to be published before making comments on Gordon Brown’s judgement!.
Despite his ‘diplomatic’ words, alleging unanimity across ‘British politics’ [Hague’s phrase!!!] on the issue of Zimbabwe, the Tory spokesperson on world affairs William Hague has already [during today Saturday 12 July 2008] fuelled speculation into the truth of what actually happened at the G8 summit where Brown allegedly bagged the Russians' support against Mugabe.
Whatever the actual facts, the comments mill is at full spin. So much so that the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been aware of it. Thus asking: how is it that Gordon Brown can be subjected to such intense analysis on everything else but not on CROSSRAIL?
[To be continued]
What exactly is the secret of this ‘eternal unanimity’ [my words] across ‘British politics’ [my, Muhammad HAQUE;s, as different from William Hague’s, phrase!]
"
Islington Tribune - by PETER GRUNER
Published: 11 July 2008
Footbridge study was ‘duplicitous’
A CONTROVERSIAL £60,000 feasibility study into a footbridge that could unite communities on either side of King’s Cross station was already “weighted against the scheme” before it was launched, according to claims this week.
Network Rail ruled out the £5million footbridge last month – promised originally in plans for the railway land redevelopment – on the grounds of costs and security complications.
But campaigners argued this week that the original brief for the study was “unneces sarily complicated”.
Islington Labour councillor Paul Convery, chairman of the west area planning committee, accused Network Rail and Camden planners, who provided the brief for the feasibility study, of being “duplicitous”.
He added: “The planners didn’t look at a simple bridge which would have stretched across the station from one side to another and which is what the residents wanted.
“Instead they looked at a complicated version with access to several platforms. Obviously that would have created a security nightmare and be costly. So the whole scheme was dropped.”
* The scheme will be discussed at a meeting by the King’s Cross Rail Group on Thursday at the Blessed Sacrament Church in Copenhagen Street, Barnsbury, at 7pm.
Comment on this article.
"
Is Gordon Brown miraculously immune from all charges, so long as he sticks by his backing for the CRASS Crossrail hole plot, London?
Depriving inner cities, or worse, ADDING to poverty in the inner cities, like Crossrail hole/s, is not the way forward, Gordon!
By©Muhammad Haque
2235 Hrs GMT
London Saturday
12 July 2008
Gordon Brown is defying all reasonable, lawful and constitutional advice, evidence e and warnings to him about his ill-advised ‘commitment to the Crossrail hole plot.
Why is he doing so?
There is no answer in what he has said so far on Crossrail.
As we have been publishing daily, there CAN BE NO EVIDENCE in support of Brown’s commitment to the London Crossrail.
It is a poverty-creating project.
It is at variance with his stated opposition to poverty.
Why then is Brown sticking by Crossrail?
We have to look at other possible causes.
Including his state of mind. We shall go to a psychological site in the next parts.
For this part,w e refer to Zimbabwe and the Sino-Russian veto on sanctions move that the USA and Brown had tabled.
Will Gordon Brown be ‘vindicated’ over the Russian veto ‘freeze’ [as Brown claimed in the House of Commons speech in effect] over the USA-UK move at the Security Council to vote for sanctions against Robert Mugabe-fronted regime? This is a question that has arisen because the Russians used their veto and opposed the USA-UK move to have the sanctions imposed against Zimbabwe.
What the final ‘evidence’ published may show about Gordon Brown’s ‘deal ‘ with Moscow’s Dmitry Medvedev before the security council vote, is not known. Yet. But nobody is waiting for the final evidence to be published before making comments on Gordon Brown’s judgement!.
Despite his ‘diplomatic’ words, alleging unanimity across ‘British politics’ [Hague’s phrase!!!] on the issue of Zimbabwe, the Tory spokesperson on world affairs William Hague has already [during today Saturday 12 July 2008] fuelled speculation into the truth of what actually happened at the G8 summit where Brown allegedly bagged the Russians' support against Mugabe.
Whatever the actual facts, the comments mill is at full spin. So much so that the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been aware of it. Thus asking: how is it that Gordon Brown can be subjected to such intense analysis on everything else but not on CROSSRAIL?
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
2235 Hrs GMT
London Saturday
12 July 2008
Gordon Brown is defying all reasonable, lawful and constitutional advice, evidence e and warnings to him about his ill-advised ‘commitment to the Crossrail hole plot.
Why is he doing so?
There is no answer in what he has said so far on Crossrail.
As we have been publishing daily, there CAN BE NO EVIDENCE in support of Brown’s commitment to the London Crossrail.
It is a poverty-creating project.
It is at variance with his stated opposition to poverty.
Why then is Brown sticking by Crossrail?
We have to look at other possible causes.
Including his state of mind. We shall go to a psychological site in the next parts.
For this part,w e refer to Zimbabwe and the Sino-Russian veto on sanctions move that the USA and Brown had tabled.
Will Gordon Brown be ‘vindicated’ over the Russian veto ‘freeze’ [as Brown claimed in the House of Commons speech in effect] over the USA-UK move at the Security Council to vote for sanctions against Robert Mugabe-fronted regime? This is a question that has arisen because the Russians used their veto and opposed the USA-UK move to have the sanctions imposed against Zimbabwe.
What the final ‘evidence’ published may show about Gordon Brown’s ‘deal ‘ with Moscow’s Dmitry Medvedev before the security council vote, is not known. Yet. But nobody is waiting for the final evidence to be published before making comments on Gordon Brown’s judgement!.
Despite his ‘diplomatic’ words, alleging unanimity across ‘British politics’ [Hague’s phrase!!!] on the issue of Zimbabwe, the Tory spokesperson on world affairs William Hague has already [during today Saturday 12 July 2008] fuelled speculation into the truth of what actually happened at the G8 summit where Brown allegedly bagged the Russians' support against Mugabe.
Whatever the actual facts, the comments mill is at full spin. So much so that the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been aware of it. Thus asking: how is it that Gordon Brown can be subjected to such intense analysis on everything else but not on CROSSRAIL?
[To be continued]
As Gordon Brown's judgement AGAIN comes under attack, how can it be that he is infallible on Crossrail hole plot alone?
As Gordon Brown's judgement AGAIN comes under attack, how can it be that he is infallible on Crossrail hole plot alone?
More, here, shortly
More, here, shortly
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
Saturday, 12 July 2008
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
2000 GMT 2100 UK Time London Saturday 12 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! is the reasonable, ordinary, common sense, lawful, legal, constitutional, ethical, moral environmental CAMPAIGN against waste of public resource by the UK Government that is being operated by elements inside the Govt bureaucracies who are in fact representative of Big Business the Big businesses have bought the soul and the minds and the attention of the decision -makers within the Govt...
KHOODEELAAR! is the antidote to all of that and above all, KHOODEELAAR! is the unique audit of the holders of 'elected office' in the name of inner city East End of London...
What KHOODEELAAR! says today on the facts, on the evidence and on the empirical studies and the factual updates of the situation concerning the ongoing imposition of poverty-creating activities via the local Tower Hamlets Council and via the other ‘power’-linked ‘holders’ of elected posts and the recipients of profitable [personally to them and at the expense of the community across the East End of London ] unelected but sub-legitimate and QUANGO-ed linked posts and connections, will be vindicated tomorrow.
The Khoodeelaar! movement is part of the same empirical foundation whence Tony McNulty, the 'minister' currently being used to front the assault on civil liberties and fundamental rights in Britain under the pretext of protecting the UK from 'greater threats to society' [=’Counter-Terrorism Bill 2008’] , had been questioned YEARS earlier about the Blairing SQUANDERING of the peoples’ mandate. The mandate as it had been expressed in May 1997....
. Khoodeelaar! has pointed out in the course of the 55 months of the campaign against Crossrail hole plot and agenda so far, the various personal and equally unpublicised other links that McNulty has with the controlling clique on and in Tower Hamlets Council.... It is via those links that McNulty would have been acquainted with the realties on the grounds of poverty and the role in creating poverty that the Council and its allied bureaucracies played...McNulty was also present at an otherwise innocent location [the Altab Ali Park] almost 3 years ago when he posed for publicity photographs near the site of one of the underground explosions that cost the innocent peoples’ lives... So McNulty has been in ‘touch’ with elements in Tower Hamlets IN THE NAME of Government as well....
Some of those who appeared with him in the series of promotional photos and related ‘facilities’ events, would be included among McNulty’s links... It was not just his own reported wife, Christine Gilbert who was still employed in the Tower Hamlets Council [as ‘chief executive’ - she was given that job despite not being the best candidate, because some key controlling clique members who appointed her, found her to be willing to overlook the conduct of the key controlling cliqusters] that McNulty would have ‘consulted’ about the 'situation'... Khoodeelaar! has evidence showing that McNulty knows quite a few individuals that are close to or are at the centre of the clique in control of Tower Hamlets CROSSRAIL hole plot-INVITING Council.... And he would therefore know that the area is not going to welcome another deprivation programme which is what the Crossrail, hole plot is... So what role has McNulty played in the actual drafting of what is now known as the hole-imposing ‘Crossrail Bill’? He was in the Crossrail hole plot-peddling DfT [=UK ‘Department for Transport’, then fronted by the current UK Finance Minister Alistair Darling] in 2004-2005... We shall examine further McNulty’s crucial role in the planned further creation of poverty in the East End of London via the implementation - and the imposition - of the Crossrail hole plot and programme. We shall look at McNulty’s linked role in the erosion of fundamental civil liberties that McNulty is now being used to front in the fanatical way that he has been. We shall show in context the serious and far reaching adverse and disproportionate effect on the community in the East End of London that BOTH pieces of McNulty-linked and over-hyped Blairing legislation will have:...... [To be continued]
Posted by AADHIKARonline London UK April 2007 at 13:08 0 com
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
2000 GMT 2100 UK Time London Saturday 12 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! is the reasonable, ordinary, common sense, lawful, legal, constitutional, ethical, moral environmental CAMPAIGN against waste of public resource by the UK Government that is being operated by elements inside the Govt bureaucracies who are in fact representative of Big Business the Big businesses have bought the soul and the minds and the attention of the decision -makers within the Govt...
KHOODEELAAR! is the antidote to all of that and above all, KHOODEELAAR! is the unique audit of the holders of 'elected office' in the name of inner city East End of London...
What KHOODEELAAR! says today on the facts, on the evidence and on the empirical studies and the factual updates of the situation concerning the ongoing imposition of poverty-creating activities via the local Tower Hamlets Council and via the other ‘power’-linked ‘holders’ of elected posts and the recipients of profitable [personally to them and at the expense of the community across the East End of London ] unelected but sub-legitimate and QUANGO-ed linked posts and connections, will be vindicated tomorrow.
The Khoodeelaar! movement is part of the same empirical foundation whence Tony McNulty, the 'minister' currently being used to front the assault on civil liberties and fundamental rights in Britain under the pretext of protecting the UK from 'greater threats to society' [=’Counter-Terrorism Bill 2008’] , had been questioned YEARS earlier about the Blairing SQUANDERING of the peoples’ mandate. The mandate as it had been expressed in May 1997....
. Khoodeelaar! has pointed out in the course of the 55 months of the campaign against Crossrail hole plot and agenda so far, the various personal and equally unpublicised other links that McNulty has with the controlling clique on and in Tower Hamlets Council.... It is via those links that McNulty would have been acquainted with the realties on the grounds of poverty and the role in creating poverty that the Council and its allied bureaucracies played...McNulty was also present at an otherwise innocent location [the Altab Ali Park] almost 3 years ago when he posed for publicity photographs near the site of one of the underground explosions that cost the innocent peoples’ lives... So McNulty has been in ‘touch’ with elements in Tower Hamlets IN THE NAME of Government as well....
Some of those who appeared with him in the series of promotional photos and related ‘facilities’ events, would be included among McNulty’s links... It was not just his own reported wife, Christine Gilbert who was still employed in the Tower Hamlets Council [as ‘chief executive’ - she was given that job despite not being the best candidate, because some key controlling clique members who appointed her, found her to be willing to overlook the conduct of the key controlling cliqusters] that McNulty would have ‘consulted’ about the 'situation'... Khoodeelaar! has evidence showing that McNulty knows quite a few individuals that are close to or are at the centre of the clique in control of Tower Hamlets CROSSRAIL hole plot-INVITING Council.... And he would therefore know that the area is not going to welcome another deprivation programme which is what the Crossrail, hole plot is... So what role has McNulty played in the actual drafting of what is now known as the hole-imposing ‘Crossrail Bill’? He was in the Crossrail hole plot-peddling DfT [=UK ‘Department for Transport’, then fronted by the current UK Finance Minister Alistair Darling] in 2004-2005... We shall examine further McNulty’s crucial role in the planned further creation of poverty in the East End of London via the implementation - and the imposition - of the Crossrail hole plot and programme. We shall look at McNulty’s linked role in the erosion of fundamental civil liberties that McNulty is now being used to front in the fanatical way that he has been. We shall show in context the serious and far reaching adverse and disproportionate effect on the community in the East End of London that BOTH pieces of McNulty-linked and over-hyped Blairing legislation will have:...... [To be continued]
Posted by AADHIKARonline London UK April 2007 at 13:08 0 com
Friday, July 11, 2008
Crossrail hole Bill 'draft'-'writer' Tony McNulty now 'writes' to do away with civil liberties in Britain....
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties 'minister' Tony McNulty?
the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....
By©Muhammad Haque
2045 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?
Why is this question being asked?
The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.
First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.
McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.
Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]
By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.
Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.
Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.
Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.
And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.
What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?
Because that was what he was saying!
Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.
Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.
Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.
No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.
In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.
Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].
No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.
McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.
I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….
Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.
It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.
He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.
The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’
McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.
And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.
Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.
It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.
This is worrying.
How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies belief…
[To be continued]
the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....
By©Muhammad Haque
2045 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?
Why is this question being asked?
The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.
First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.
McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.
Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]
By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.
Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.
Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.
Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.
And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.
What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?
Because that was what he was saying!
Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.
Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.
Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.
No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.
In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.
Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].
No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.
McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.
I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….
Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.
It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.
He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.
The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’
McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.
And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.
Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.
It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.
This is worrying.
How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies belief…
[To be continued]
Crossrail hole Bill 'draft'-'writer' Tony McNulty now 'writes' to do away with civil liberties in Britain....
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties 'minister' Tony McNulty?
the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....
By©Muhammad Haque
2045 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?
Why is this question being asked?
The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.
First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.
McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.
Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]
By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.
Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.
Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.
Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.
And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.
What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?
Because that was what he was saying!
Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.
Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.
Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.
No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.
In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.
Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].
No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.
McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.
I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….
Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.
It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.
He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.
The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’
McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.
And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.
Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.
It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.
This is worrying.
How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies believe…
[To be continued]
the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....
By©Muhammad Haque
2045 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?
Why is this question being asked?
The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.
First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.
McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.
Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]
By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.
Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.
Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.
Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.
And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.
What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?
Because that was what he was saying!
Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.
Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.
Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.
No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.
In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.
Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].
No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.
McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.
I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….
Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.
It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.
He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.
The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’
McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.
And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.
Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.
It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.
This is worrying.
How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies believe…
[To be continued]
Boris Johnson has got to know what his Party Chair Francis Maude said AGAINST the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London
Boris Johnson has got to know what his Party Chair Francis Maude said AGAINST the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London
1320 GMT 1420 UK London Friday 11 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! action archive of the MUHAMMAD HAQUE interview of the then Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude [still an MP in the UK House fo Commons].on what he and his Part would say and o against the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End fo London The interview was conducted in Brick Lane London E1 and published in transcript in the same afternoon on Monday 24 April 2006....In the two years and two months since then, we have observed the behaviour of the Conservative Party in the UK Parliament,.. An updater commentary on that will appear here soon. First the interview with Francis Maude [see below] [To be continued]
AADHIKARonline transcript of the question and answer between Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque and Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude, in Brick Lane London E1 at 1210 Hrs appx GMT on Monday 24 April 2006
Transcript posted on aadhikaronline web pages at 1345 Hrs GMT Monday 24 April 2006
1. Muhammad Haque [Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 area No to Crossrail hole Bill] : Hello can I ask you a Question from Khoodeelaar?
Francis Maude: Yes. Do.
2. Muhammad Haque: [Khoodeelaar is] the Campaign against Crossrail hole [in the Brick Lane London E1 area]
3. Muhammad Haque What would you say is your Party’s position?
Francis Maude: Well, we’re very much in favour of CrossRail… which we think can deliver very serious benefits to the area but we’re concerned that there shouldn’t be [slight stammer] all of the digging up of [slight stammer] the [Brick Lane London E1 ] area to make it happen, We don’t see that it’s necessary.
4. Muhammad Haque: Do you believe Alistair Darling's
Francis Maude: No
5. Muhammad Haque: [UK Transport Secretary – the Crossrail hole Minister] Alistair Darling’s statement, said in a written statement on 30 March [2006] what do you say to that?
Francis Maude: No. You see that’s simply pre-election [hesitation]] manoeuvring. I wouldn't trust anything he [Alistair Darling] says.
6. .Muhammad Haque: Are you going to take it up as a formal motion against his
Francis Maude: my colleagues are. My colleagues will be. Thank you very much.
7 Muhammad Haque: When do you expect to do that?
Francis Maude: Well, very soon.
”
1320 GMT 1420 UK London Friday 11 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! action archive of the MUHAMMAD HAQUE interview of the then Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude [still an MP in the UK House fo Commons].on what he and his Part would say and o against the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End fo London The interview was conducted in Brick Lane London E1 and published in transcript in the same afternoon on Monday 24 April 2006....In the two years and two months since then, we have observed the behaviour of the Conservative Party in the UK Parliament,.. An updater commentary on that will appear here soon. First the interview with Francis Maude [see below] [To be continued]
AADHIKARonline transcript of the question and answer between Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque and Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude, in Brick Lane London E1 at 1210 Hrs appx GMT on Monday 24 April 2006
Transcript posted on aadhikaronline web pages at 1345 Hrs GMT Monday 24 April 2006
1. Muhammad Haque [Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 area No to Crossrail hole Bill] : Hello can I ask you a Question from Khoodeelaar?
Francis Maude: Yes. Do.
2. Muhammad Haque: [Khoodeelaar is] the Campaign against Crossrail hole [in the Brick Lane London E1 area]
3. Muhammad Haque What would you say is your Party’s position?
Francis Maude: Well, we’re very much in favour of CrossRail… which we think can deliver very serious benefits to the area but we’re concerned that there shouldn’t be [slight stammer] all of the digging up of [slight stammer] the [Brick Lane London E1 ] area to make it happen, We don’t see that it’s necessary.
4. Muhammad Haque: Do you believe Alistair Darling's
Francis Maude: No
5. Muhammad Haque: [UK Transport Secretary – the Crossrail hole Minister] Alistair Darling’s statement, said in a written statement on 30 March [2006] what do you say to that?
Francis Maude: No. You see that’s simply pre-election [hesitation]] manoeuvring. I wouldn't trust anything he [Alistair Darling] says.
6. .Muhammad Haque: Are you going to take it up as a formal motion against his
Francis Maude: my colleagues are. My colleagues will be. Thank you very much.
7 Muhammad Haque: When do you expect to do that?
Francis Maude: Well, very soon.
”
KHOODEELAAR! exposé of the emptiness of Crossrail lobby-man Francis Salway also shows way out for Gordon Brown....
This page of AADHIKARonline was last edited at 1212GMT Fri 11.07.2008
You quote Francis salway as saying about Crossrail:
"The key bit was about London’s contribution to GDP, its share in the growth of exports and how a strong London leads to growth outside the capital. We were able to show how many businesses that had set up in London went on to open offices outside the city. It was an example of how getting facts can help with lobbying.’ "
It is to be noted that there is no reference to the transport needs of London people. There is no reference to the severe income disparity that exists between every two parts of central London. There is no reference to the severely persistent jobless rates in ALL London boroughs. There is no mention of the English regions in the context of the economic performance of the UK as a whole. No comparative or even basic recognition of the human resources that are wasted by bad management and poor maintenance of existing transport infrastructure in London, in the suburbs and in the regions... So what Francis Salway did was to LOBBY. Pure and simple. No evidence needed to justify the allocation of £Billions of public money to a scam that was NOT recommended in the report authored in the name of Rod Eddington. The two ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committees’ in the two Houses of the UK parliament were either barred from receiving evidence showing up the shallowness and overwhelming irrelevance and wastefulness of Crossrail or were too callously constituted and stooged themselves to seek such evidence from interested parties and objectors. If Gordon Brown is going to be liable for wasting £Billions on Crossrail then at least on this one, he will know who conned him and tricked him into doing so. We say even at this stage, Gordon Brown and the UK economy will be better off scrapping the crassly conceived London Crossrail scam.
You quote Francis salway as saying about Crossrail:
"The key bit was about London’s contribution to GDP, its share in the growth of exports and how a strong London leads to growth outside the capital. We were able to show how many businesses that had set up in London went on to open offices outside the city. It was an example of how getting facts can help with lobbying.’ "
It is to be noted that there is no reference to the transport needs of London people. There is no reference to the severe income disparity that exists between every two parts of central London. There is no reference to the severely persistent jobless rates in ALL London boroughs. There is no mention of the English regions in the context of the economic performance of the UK as a whole. No comparative or even basic recognition of the human resources that are wasted by bad management and poor maintenance of existing transport infrastructure in London, in the suburbs and in the regions... So what Francis Salway did was to LOBBY. Pure and simple. No evidence needed to justify the allocation of £Billions of public money to a scam that was NOT recommended in the report authored in the name of Rod Eddington. The two ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committees’ in the two Houses of the UK parliament were either barred from receiving evidence showing up the shallowness and overwhelming irrelevance and wastefulness of Crossrail or were too callously constituted and stooged themselves to seek such evidence from interested parties and objectors. If Gordon Brown is going to be liable for wasting £Billions on Crossrail then at least on this one, he will know who conned him and tricked him into doing so. We say even at this stage, Gordon Brown and the UK economy will be better off scrapping the crassly conceived London Crossrail scam.
KHOODEELAAR! expose of the emptiness of Crossrail lobby-man Francis Salway also shows way out for Gordon Brown....
You quote Francis salway as saying about Crossrail:
"The key bit was about London’s contribution to GDP, its share in the growth of exports and how a strong London leads to growth outside the capital. We were able to show how many businesses that had set up in London went on to open offices outside the city. It was an example of how getting facts can help with lobbying.’ "
It is to be noted that there is no reference to the transport needs of London people.
There is no reference to the severe income disparity that exists between every two parts of central London.
There is no reference to the severely persistent jobless rates in ALL London boroughs.
There is no mention of the English regions in the context of the economic performance of the UK as a whole.
No comparative or even basic recognition of the human resources that are wasted by bad management and poor maintenance of existing transport infrastructure in London, in the suburbs and in the regions...
So what Francis Salway did was to LOBBY. Pure and simple.
No evidence needed to justify the allocation of £Billions of public money to a scam that was NOT recommended in the report authored in the name of Rod Eddington.
The two ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committees’ in the two Houses of the UK parliament were either barred from receiving evidence showing up the shallowness and overwhelming irrelevance and wastefulness of Crossrail or were too callously constituted and stooged themselves to seek such evidence from interested parties and objectors. If Gordon Brown is going to be liable for wasting £Billions on Crossrail then at least on this one, he will know who conned him and tricked him into doing so. We say even at this stage, Gordon Brown and the UK economy will be better off scrapping the crassly conceived London Crossrail scam.
KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business CRASSrail hole scam
"The key bit was about London’s contribution to GDP, its share in the growth of exports and how a strong London leads to growth outside the capital. We were able to show how many businesses that had set up in London went on to open offices outside the city. It was an example of how getting facts can help with lobbying.’ "
It is to be noted that there is no reference to the transport needs of London people.
There is no reference to the severe income disparity that exists between every two parts of central London.
There is no reference to the severely persistent jobless rates in ALL London boroughs.
There is no mention of the English regions in the context of the economic performance of the UK as a whole.
No comparative or even basic recognition of the human resources that are wasted by bad management and poor maintenance of existing transport infrastructure in London, in the suburbs and in the regions...
So what Francis Salway did was to LOBBY. Pure and simple.
No evidence needed to justify the allocation of £Billions of public money to a scam that was NOT recommended in the report authored in the name of Rod Eddington.
The two ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committees’ in the two Houses of the UK parliament were either barred from receiving evidence showing up the shallowness and overwhelming irrelevance and wastefulness of Crossrail or were too callously constituted and stooged themselves to seek such evidence from interested parties and objectors. If Gordon Brown is going to be liable for wasting £Billions on Crossrail then at least on this one, he will know who conned him and tricked him into doing so. We say even at this stage, Gordon Brown and the UK economy will be better off scrapping the crassly conceived London Crossrail scam.
KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business CRASSrail hole scam
Boris Johnson has got to know what his Party Chair Francis Maude said AGAINST the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London
This AADHIKARonline page was last edited at 1320 Hrs GMT London Friday 11 July 2008
1320 GMT 1420 UK London Friday 11 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! action archive of the MUHAMMAD HAQUE interview of the then Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude [still an MP in the UK House fo Commons].on what he and his Part would say and o against the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End fo London The interview was conducted in Brick Lane London E1 and published in transcript in the same afternoon on Monday 24 April 2006....In the two years and two months since then, we have observed the behaviour of the Conservative Party in the UK Parliament,.. An updater commentary on that will appear here soon. First the interview with Francis Maude [see below] [To be continued]
AADHIKARonline transcript of the question and answer between Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque and Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude, in Brick Lane London E1 at 1210 Hrs appx GMT on Monday 24 April 2006
Transcript posted on aadhikaronline web pages at 1345 Hrs GMT Monday 24 April 2006
1. Muhammad Haque [Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 area No to Crossrail hole Bill] : Hello can I ask you a Question from Khoodeelaar?
Francis Maude: Yes. Do.
2. Muhammad Haque: [Khoodeelaar is] the Campaign against Crossrail hole [in the Brick Lane London E1 area]
3. Muhammad Haque What would you say is your Party’s position?
Francis Maude: Well, we’re very much in favour of CrossRail… which we think can deliver very serious benefits to the area but we’re concerned that there shouldn’t be [slight stammer] all of the digging up of [slight stammer] the [Brick Lane London E1 ] area to make it happen, We don’t see that it’s necessary.
4. Muhammad Haque: Do you believe Alistair Darling's
Francis Maude: No
5. Muhammad Haque: [UK Transport Secretary – the Crossrail hole Minister] Alistair Darling’s statement, said in a written statement on 30 March [2006] what do you say to that?
Francis Maude: No. You see that’s simply pre-election [hesitation]] manoeuvring. I wouldn't trust anything he [Alistair Darling] says.
6. .Muhammad Haque: Are you going to take it up as a formal motion against his
Francis Maude: my colleagues are. My colleagues will be. Thank you very much.
7 Muhammad Haque: When do you expect to do that?
Francis Maude: Well, very soon.
”
1320 GMT 1420 UK London Friday 11 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! action archive of the MUHAMMAD HAQUE interview of the then Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude [still an MP in the UK House fo Commons].on what he and his Part would say and o against the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End fo London The interview was conducted in Brick Lane London E1 and published in transcript in the same afternoon on Monday 24 April 2006....In the two years and two months since then, we have observed the behaviour of the Conservative Party in the UK Parliament,.. An updater commentary on that will appear here soon. First the interview with Francis Maude [see below] [To be continued]
AADHIKARonline transcript of the question and answer between Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque and Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude, in Brick Lane London E1 at 1210 Hrs appx GMT on Monday 24 April 2006
Transcript posted on aadhikaronline web pages at 1345 Hrs GMT Monday 24 April 2006
1. Muhammad Haque [Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 area No to Crossrail hole Bill] : Hello can I ask you a Question from Khoodeelaar?
Francis Maude: Yes. Do.
2. Muhammad Haque: [Khoodeelaar is] the Campaign against Crossrail hole [in the Brick Lane London E1 area]
3. Muhammad Haque What would you say is your Party’s position?
Francis Maude: Well, we’re very much in favour of CrossRail… which we think can deliver very serious benefits to the area but we’re concerned that there shouldn’t be [slight stammer] all of the digging up of [slight stammer] the [Brick Lane London E1 ] area to make it happen, We don’t see that it’s necessary.
4. Muhammad Haque: Do you believe Alistair Darling's
Francis Maude: No
5. Muhammad Haque: [UK Transport Secretary – the Crossrail hole Minister] Alistair Darling’s statement, said in a written statement on 30 March [2006] what do you say to that?
Francis Maude: No. You see that’s simply pre-election [hesitation]] manoeuvring. I wouldn't trust anything he [Alistair Darling] says.
6. .Muhammad Haque: Are you going to take it up as a formal motion against his
Francis Maude: my colleagues are. My colleagues will be. Thank you very much.
7 Muhammad Haque: When do you expect to do that?
Francis Maude: Well, very soon.
”
Crossrail 'lobby' man confesses to in effect having conned Gordon Brown to commit £Billions of public money...
This page of AADHIKARonline was last edited at 0955 GMT 11 July 2008
0950 GMT 1050 UKTime London Friday 11 July 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘CRASSness, dishonesty, abuse of public funds for Big Business agenda crossrail hole Plot...” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! THAT just as Ken Livingstone has confessed to having LIED to get the diversionary, uneconomic, socially divisive and degenerating = deprivation-creating [contrary to his double-whammy lying confession] public funding for the 2012 Olympic Games hosting stunt [that has been spiralling out of all limits in cost overruns] so have they LIED to get Gordon Brown to commit £Billions to the Big Business Crossrail hole plot..... This is in effect admitted by Francis Salway, one of those involved in the elaborate fabrication of the ‘Crossrail lobby’ ...Salway’ admission again shows that CROSSRAIL is indeed CRASS... That it has lacked substance and merit from the start and that they have been faking, fabricating, making up to peddle it ,, and that the only main beneficiary will be the Big Business behind the construction scams.... Crossrail is NOT about addressing transport needs of Lon don at all... This is exposed in the banal admissions by Francis Salway as published today.
[To be continued]
0950 GMT 1050 UKTime London Friday 11 July 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘CRASSness, dishonesty, abuse of public funds for Big Business agenda crossrail hole Plot...” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! THAT just as Ken Livingstone has confessed to having LIED to get the diversionary, uneconomic, socially divisive and degenerating = deprivation-creating [contrary to his double-whammy lying confession] public funding for the 2012 Olympic Games hosting stunt [that has been spiralling out of all limits in cost overruns] so have they LIED to get Gordon Brown to commit £Billions to the Big Business Crossrail hole plot..... This is in effect admitted by Francis Salway, one of those involved in the elaborate fabrication of the ‘Crossrail lobby’ ...Salway’ admission again shows that CROSSRAIL is indeed CRASS... That it has lacked substance and merit from the start and that they have been faking, fabricating, making up to peddle it ,, and that the only main beneficiary will be the Big Business behind the construction scams.... Crossrail is NOT about addressing transport needs of Lon don at all... This is exposed in the banal admissions by Francis Salway as published today.
[To be continued]
Fact-based lies for CRASSrail lobby confession by Francis Salway confirms what we have said all along:
This page of AADHIKARonline last edited at 0930 GMT Fri 11.07.2008
That they lied and fabricated to 'make the case for Crossrail' and to get Gordon Brown to make the public money to the tune of £Billions, is in effect admitted in a propaganda item published today.
More, here, shortly
That they lied and fabricated to 'make the case for Crossrail' and to get Gordon Brown to make the public money to the tune of £Billions, is in effect admitted in a propaganda item published today.
More, here, shortly
Thursday, July 10, 2008
BBC kept up its agenda of sabotaging the campaign against 42 day detention, at Haltemprice by-election results
This version of AADHIKARonline last edited at 0330 GMT Fri 11.07.2008
Tim Wilcox, fronting the News Channel suppression, made incoherent excuses for the entire proceedings of the announcement of the results being effectively sabotaged by the BBC...
They managed, significantly, to keep broadcasting their biased and lies-filled 'comments' by Ian Watson, their so-called political reporter...
See also the AADHIKARonline review of the behaviour of Michael Crick, the BBC's allegedly expert by-election specialist... [The disgraceful careerism of the late Vincent Hannah will be revisited]
[To be continued]
[
Tim Wilcox, fronting the News Channel suppression, made incoherent excuses for the entire proceedings of the announcement of the results being effectively sabotaged by the BBC...
They managed, significantly, to keep broadcasting their biased and lies-filled 'comments' by Ian Watson, their so-called political reporter...
See also the AADHIKARonline review of the behaviour of Michael Crick, the BBC's allegedly expert by-election specialist... [The disgraceful careerism of the late Vincent Hannah will be revisited]
[To be continued]
[
BBC Question Time exposes Mark Thompson's bragging utterances to an MPs group: He has to drop Saira Khan ...and the ignorance that she personifies
This edition of AADHIKARonline was edited at 2250 GMT Thursday 10.07.2008
BBC Question Time exposes Mark Thompson's bragging utterances to an MPs group: He has to drop Saira Khan ...and the ignorance that she personifies
More, here, shortly
BBC Question Time exposes Mark Thompson's bragging utterances to an MPs group: He has to drop Saira Khan ...and the ignorance that she personifies
More, here, shortly
What cost and what price Haltemprice & Howden? How CLOSE is the issue to who might have drafted the Crossrail Bill plot?
Part 3 of today's commentary on the goings on 'in and around' the British parliament., due here. soon
Crossrail hole plot-backer Alistair Darling's excuses in the Commons today are as untrue as his claims for CRASSrail...
By©Muhammad Haque
1615 Hrs GMT
London Thursday
10 July 2008
This action commentary is about Alistair Darling and Ken Livingstone, two of the peddlers of the CRASSrail hole plot. This commentary is in four parts:
PART 1
Ken Livingstone's self-promoting, ego-linked, careeristic opportunism was displayed again this week when he was able to sneak into the focal lenses of the various licensed broadcast media as he paraded his need for attention via one of the UK House of Commons committees... The excuse for the broadcast media peddling the pathetic appearances was that Livingstone was the former mayor' in the name of London. There was no truth in what he said about various UK Govt departments. For it was one of those Departments, the DfT that he had used to the limits to push for the Crassrail hole plot. Did he make any comp,aunt against that? Did he tell how he LIED to various Govt Departments over the stunt around the London bid to host the 2012 Olympic games? Did he tell how he lied to get Gordon Brown to make that commitment of £Billions of UK public cash to CRASSrail? Not a bit of it. And not surprisingly, either. Because the 'Select Committee' is not made up of morally courageous, let alone constitutionally conscientious and informed people. Most of these Select Committees are STOOGED. And most of these who get on them are there because they have no better role to perform. Had there been real true and truthful scrutiny of the UK Executive then the society would have been spared so many malaise, so many misrepresentations There is a serious central lie at work in the excuses that Gordon Brown has been making for instance to explain the current economic problems. He is blaming the rest of the world. Just as Alistair Darling did Darling the ‘Treasury Questions’ this morning [Thursday 10 July 2008]... Instead of addressing the deficit of democracy and attacking dishonesty, Ken Livingstone was revelling in the defect has been Livingstone;s career.... He NEEDS lack of democracy He craves lack of accountability....As he did in February 2008 when he lost his pretence and told off a meeting of the usually tokenistic London Assembly for behaving unusually in that they [on that exceptional occasion actually] asked him Questions about how and why he was allowing abuse of funds and misusing the public's resources...while he was occupying the post in the name of the people of London
[To be continued]
London mayor Livingstone obstructs Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole
By©Muhammad Haque
1000 Hrs GMT London
Wednesday 26 April 2006
Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of aadhikaronline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude's backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
1. Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of aadhikaronline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude's backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
2. That communication from the head of Ken Livingstone’s transport department, effectively says that the Khoodeelaar! demands for Ken Livingstone to make full disclosure of all his communications with the clique of corrupt controllers of Tower Hamlets Council are too expensive for the London Mayor to comply with !
3. There is no specific item that the London Mayor has identified in his mayor communication to Khoodeelaar on Monday 24 April 2006 as constituting an allegedly over-the-permitted limit of administration cost request under the Freed of Information Act.
4. The key point is that Khoodeelaar! the campaign against the CrossRail hole Bill attacks plan on the Brick Lane London E1 area, has been issuing ken Livingstone with a series of pre-action [letter before claim] communications and the London mayor has now run out of excuses.
5. At the centre of the Khoodeelaar legal action claims against Ken Livingstone lies in the fact that the mayor has persistently misled Londoners generally and the UK Parliament through his undisclosed deals with the Transport Department and in particular the people of the East End community affected by the CrossRail hole plan.
6. Khoodeelaar! delivered the first demand to ken Livingstone for confirming a number of facts that were linked with the mayor’s release of a news item on 24 March 2006.
7. That was followed within a day or two by other calls on Livingstone to disclose the facts of his dealing with the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council.
8. It was again repeated by Khoodeelaar! no to Crossrail hole campaign updating their calls on Livingstone to deal with the factual questions that arose about the stunt from the written statement about the CrossRail hole Bill that was issued in the UK House of Commons by CrossRail hole Minister Alistair Darling on 30 March 2006.
9. The mayor is on record as having touted for the enlisting of the ‘leaders’ and ‘lead members’ of a number of local councils, including the then leader of Tower Hamlets Council [Helal Uddin Abbas] in February 2004 as part of the Livingstone lobby for CrossRail plan.
10. In a Crossrail-hole-plan promotional ‘letter’ published in 2004 under the name of Ken Livingstone together with the names of Helal Uddin Abbas and others from other local Councils, the promotion of CrossRail was made without a single qualification let alone reservation.
11. Khoodeelaar! immediately wrote to both Livingstone and demanded that the Evening Standard publish the truth about the CrossRail hole plan. Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque told the Editor of the London EVENING STANDARD that their failure to publish the truth about the CrossRail plan [as it still was - because the CrossRail hole Bill was not put before the House of Commons until 22 February 2005, almost a year after Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque was having the series of demands put on Ken Livingstone and Christine Gilbert to tell the truth of their then role in promoting the CrossRail plan. The EVENING STANDARD failed to publish the truth. As did Ken Livingstone.
12.
That was in February 2004.
13. Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque also wrote to Tower Hamlets Council chief Executive Christine Gilbert in February 2004 and in March 2004 asking for a series of detailed answers to questions about her own role in promoting the CrossRail hole plan including the question as to what advice, if any, had she, Christine Gilbert, given to the ruling clique or group on the Tower Hamlets Council. There was no reply. There has been no reply.
14. When Khoodeelaar! issued the latest then updated series of legal claims against Alistair Darling, ken Livingstone, Christine Gilbert and a few others and said that the application to the High Court in London against them would be filed on Monday 27 March 2006, a number of things immediately happened.
15. Ken Livingstone suddenly issued a news release on 24 March 2006 saying that the CrossRail Dirt hole in the Brick Lane London E1 had been scrapped!
16. And that Ken Livingstone Crossrail-Dirt-hole plan against Brick Lane London E1 area scrapping stunt announcement was then used as the peg for the evening TV news which featured the entire cabal of self-seeking politicos doing their fame slots and assorted other fantasies. They were given more time than khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque who did say on the record [BBC London News, Friday 24 April 2006] that as far as Khoodeelaar! was concerned, they had immediately asked Livingstone to substantiate the claims of the scrapping of the Crossrail Dirty hole plan and demanded that Livingstone to answer the outstanding detailed KHOODEELAAR! no to CrossRail hole questions that had been put to him as based on his unqualified plugs for the CrossRail plan over the previous years
17. Accordingly, Muhammad Haque and Khoodeelaar! campaign sent the detailed further questions immediately and also went to City hall on Monday 3 April 2006 and delivered a series of questions for Livingstone to deal with.
18. On the same occasion [3 April 2006] Khoodeelaar demonstrated the campaign’s opposition to Ken Livingstone's role so far and demanded that Livingstone come out with the overdue answers to the extensive and the very comprehensive KHOODEELAAR! No to the Crossrail hole questions which had arisen from Livingstone’s stunt staged on Friday 24 March 2006 about the alleged scrapping of the CrossRail Dirt hole.
19. Livingstone remained silent
20. Until the aadhikaronline news carried the first detailed transcripts of the Khoodeelaar! Organiser’s Questions and answers encounter with Conservative party chair Francis Maude in Brick Lane in the mid afternoon of Monday 24 April 2006.
21. Ken Livingstone’s head of Transports sent an e-mail which is full of typical Ken Livingstone's dissembling. The concept of dissembling as associated with ken Livingstone on 24 April 2006 had already been spotted and identified a month previously [on Friday 24 March 2006] out by Khoodeelaar organiser Muhammad Haque in his news interview with the BBC London political editor Tim Donovan on that date [Friday 24 March 2006].
1615 Hrs GMT
London Thursday
10 July 2008
This action commentary is about Alistair Darling and Ken Livingstone, two of the peddlers of the CRASSrail hole plot. This commentary is in four parts:
PART 1
Ken Livingstone's self-promoting, ego-linked, careeristic opportunism was displayed again this week when he was able to sneak into the focal lenses of the various licensed broadcast media as he paraded his need for attention via one of the UK House of Commons committees... The excuse for the broadcast media peddling the pathetic appearances was that Livingstone was the former mayor' in the name of London. There was no truth in what he said about various UK Govt departments. For it was one of those Departments, the DfT that he had used to the limits to push for the Crassrail hole plot. Did he make any comp,aunt against that? Did he tell how he LIED to various Govt Departments over the stunt around the London bid to host the 2012 Olympic games? Did he tell how he lied to get Gordon Brown to make that commitment of £Billions of UK public cash to CRASSrail? Not a bit of it. And not surprisingly, either. Because the 'Select Committee' is not made up of morally courageous, let alone constitutionally conscientious and informed people. Most of these Select Committees are STOOGED. And most of these who get on them are there because they have no better role to perform. Had there been real true and truthful scrutiny of the UK Executive then the society would have been spared so many malaise, so many misrepresentations There is a serious central lie at work in the excuses that Gordon Brown has been making for instance to explain the current economic problems. He is blaming the rest of the world. Just as Alistair Darling did Darling the ‘Treasury Questions’ this morning [Thursday 10 July 2008]... Instead of addressing the deficit of democracy and attacking dishonesty, Ken Livingstone was revelling in the defect has been Livingstone;s career.... He NEEDS lack of democracy He craves lack of accountability....As he did in February 2008 when he lost his pretence and told off a meeting of the usually tokenistic London Assembly for behaving unusually in that they [on that exceptional occasion actually] asked him Questions about how and why he was allowing abuse of funds and misusing the public's resources...while he was occupying the post in the name of the people of London
[To be continued]
London mayor Livingstone obstructs Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole
By©Muhammad Haque
1000 Hrs GMT London
Wednesday 26 April 2006
Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of aadhikaronline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude's backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
1. Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of aadhikaronline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude's backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
2. That communication from the head of Ken Livingstone’s transport department, effectively says that the Khoodeelaar! demands for Ken Livingstone to make full disclosure of all his communications with the clique of corrupt controllers of Tower Hamlets Council are too expensive for the London Mayor to comply with !
3. There is no specific item that the London Mayor has identified in his mayor communication to Khoodeelaar on Monday 24 April 2006 as constituting an allegedly over-the-permitted limit of administration cost request under the Freed of Information Act.
4. The key point is that Khoodeelaar! the campaign against the CrossRail hole Bill attacks plan on the Brick Lane London E1 area, has been issuing ken Livingstone with a series of pre-action [letter before claim] communications and the London mayor has now run out of excuses.
5. At the centre of the Khoodeelaar legal action claims against Ken Livingstone lies in the fact that the mayor has persistently misled Londoners generally and the UK Parliament through his undisclosed deals with the Transport Department and in particular the people of the East End community affected by the CrossRail hole plan.
6. Khoodeelaar! delivered the first demand to ken Livingstone for confirming a number of facts that were linked with the mayor’s release of a news item on 24 March 2006.
7. That was followed within a day or two by other calls on Livingstone to disclose the facts of his dealing with the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council.
8. It was again repeated by Khoodeelaar! no to Crossrail hole campaign updating their calls on Livingstone to deal with the factual questions that arose about the stunt from the written statement about the CrossRail hole Bill that was issued in the UK House of Commons by CrossRail hole Minister Alistair Darling on 30 March 2006.
9. The mayor is on record as having touted for the enlisting of the ‘leaders’ and ‘lead members’ of a number of local councils, including the then leader of Tower Hamlets Council [Helal Uddin Abbas] in February 2004 as part of the Livingstone lobby for CrossRail plan.
10. In a Crossrail-hole-plan promotional ‘letter’ published in 2004 under the name of Ken Livingstone together with the names of Helal Uddin Abbas and others from other local Councils, the promotion of CrossRail was made without a single qualification let alone reservation.
11. Khoodeelaar! immediately wrote to both Livingstone and demanded that the Evening Standard publish the truth about the CrossRail hole plan. Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque told the Editor of the London EVENING STANDARD that their failure to publish the truth about the CrossRail plan [as it still was - because the CrossRail hole Bill was not put before the House of Commons until 22 February 2005, almost a year after Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque was having the series of demands put on Ken Livingstone and Christine Gilbert to tell the truth of their then role in promoting the CrossRail plan. The EVENING STANDARD failed to publish the truth. As did Ken Livingstone.
12.
That was in February 2004.
13. Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque also wrote to Tower Hamlets Council chief Executive Christine Gilbert in February 2004 and in March 2004 asking for a series of detailed answers to questions about her own role in promoting the CrossRail hole plan including the question as to what advice, if any, had she, Christine Gilbert, given to the ruling clique or group on the Tower Hamlets Council. There was no reply. There has been no reply.
14. When Khoodeelaar! issued the latest then updated series of legal claims against Alistair Darling, ken Livingstone, Christine Gilbert and a few others and said that the application to the High Court in London against them would be filed on Monday 27 March 2006, a number of things immediately happened.
15. Ken Livingstone suddenly issued a news release on 24 March 2006 saying that the CrossRail Dirt hole in the Brick Lane London E1 had been scrapped!
16. And that Ken Livingstone Crossrail-Dirt-hole plan against Brick Lane London E1 area scrapping stunt announcement was then used as the peg for the evening TV news which featured the entire cabal of self-seeking politicos doing their fame slots and assorted other fantasies. They were given more time than khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque who did say on the record [BBC London News, Friday 24 April 2006] that as far as Khoodeelaar! was concerned, they had immediately asked Livingstone to substantiate the claims of the scrapping of the Crossrail Dirty hole plan and demanded that Livingstone to answer the outstanding detailed KHOODEELAAR! no to CrossRail hole questions that had been put to him as based on his unqualified plugs for the CrossRail plan over the previous years
17. Accordingly, Muhammad Haque and Khoodeelaar! campaign sent the detailed further questions immediately and also went to City hall on Monday 3 April 2006 and delivered a series of questions for Livingstone to deal with.
18. On the same occasion [3 April 2006] Khoodeelaar demonstrated the campaign’s opposition to Ken Livingstone's role so far and demanded that Livingstone come out with the overdue answers to the extensive and the very comprehensive KHOODEELAAR! No to the Crossrail hole questions which had arisen from Livingstone’s stunt staged on Friday 24 March 2006 about the alleged scrapping of the CrossRail Dirt hole.
19. Livingstone remained silent
20. Until the aadhikaronline news carried the first detailed transcripts of the Khoodeelaar! Organiser’s Questions and answers encounter with Conservative party chair Francis Maude in Brick Lane in the mid afternoon of Monday 24 April 2006.
21. Ken Livingstone’s head of Transports sent an e-mail which is full of typical Ken Livingstone's dissembling. The concept of dissembling as associated with ken Livingstone on 24 April 2006 had already been spotted and identified a month previously [on Friday 24 March 2006] out by Khoodeelaar organiser Muhammad Haque in his news interview with the BBC London political editor Tim Donovan on that date [Friday 24 March 2006].
What they said in Parliament on Wednesday 9 July 2008: How it all exposed the poverty of 'democratically elected' Parliament
THIS PAGE last edited at 0925 Hrs GMT London Thursday 10 july 2008
What they said in Parliament on Wednesday 9 July 2008: How it all exposed the poverty of 'democratically elected' Parliament
Coming here, Shortly.
What they said in Parliament on Wednesday 9 July 2008: How it all exposed the poverty of 'democratically elected' Parliament
Coming here, Shortly.
Tuesday, July 8, 2008
A source [see details in main post] 'discloses' that Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique has ABOLISHED the concept of 'official Opposition'...
By©Muhammad Haque
0212 Hrs GMT
London Wednesday 9 July 2008
The following has been obtained by AADHIKARonline research unit at appx 0200 Hrs GMT today Wednesday 9 July 2008 from a blog published by a former Conservative councillor who is based in Kent England UK. The reference to Tower Hamlets, Council is the reason for this being published by AADHIKARonline. The blogger is called Dan Hassett. We are publishing the following just for the record. AADHIKARonline will comment on the situation in Tower Hamlets as part of the continuing, ongoing, daily commentary.
"
The London Borough of Tower Hamlets has apparently
taken the bizarre step of abolishing the Official Opposition status,
because they were unhappy that the Conservatives were the opposition
after Respect collapsed on itself. They have now given the chief
scrutiny roles to their own councillors, and even have a Cabinet
member on the scrutiny committee. The Conservatives there rightly
refuse to take their seats on the committee in protest, but attend in an
individual role to oversee the committee.
"
[To be continued]
0212 Hrs GMT
London Wednesday 9 July 2008
The following has been obtained by AADHIKARonline research unit at appx 0200 Hrs GMT today Wednesday 9 July 2008 from a blog published by a former Conservative councillor who is based in Kent England UK. The reference to Tower Hamlets, Council is the reason for this being published by AADHIKARonline. The blogger is called Dan Hassett. We are publishing the following just for the record. AADHIKARonline will comment on the situation in Tower Hamlets as part of the continuing, ongoing, daily commentary.
"
The London Borough of Tower Hamlets has apparently
taken the bizarre step of abolishing the Official Opposition status,
because they were unhappy that the Conservatives were the opposition
after Respect collapsed on itself. They have now given the chief
scrutiny roles to their own councillors, and even have a Cabinet
member on the scrutiny committee. The Conservatives there rightly
refuse to take their seats on the committee in protest, but attend in an
individual role to oversee the committee.
"
[To be continued]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the 'Crossrail Bill' [a Bill in UK Parliament]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SGqe5VQwLHI/AAAAAAAABfc/MEjjMWby2dc/S226/Khoodeelaar!+try+this+logo.gif)
![London [Rupert Murdoched] Times, Wed. 7 May 2008](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitiFRN6uO_MOdYMby0s7ow2zcBaewOKfl3k4QdCPcahu1IKXx6sl7Gs4aO9VrAhN8gQJvYb1a2JnODsTUsMks_LtoZVuqc64whMkMitNKVz1bijPST853uNwRNG8x2PVFl1kqRez8M3b-j/s226/1676149.jpg)
