Ths AADHIKAROnline page was last edited at 0530 GMT Friday 18 July 2008
This is the text from the printed version of KHOODEELAAR! published this morning.
A script for Harriet Harman
as written on the evidence of her conduct
By©Muhammad Haque
Friday 18 July 2008
Evening all! It’s Harriet here with the Police guard! I am the country’s soon-to-
be-occupant at No 10 Downing Street. As I sneak and crawl my way... I am
here in a spot very similar to Brick Lane London E1. I am behind the Police
shields, as I prepare to celebrate the Crossrail hole digging Bill, being passed
.. I am here to assure the East End of London that all Crossrail holes, all
digging, all the removals, losses of jobs, losses of shops, streets places, the
noise, the illnesses the disparity be treated as ‘benefits’ to the people who
will be the losers. I am able to show how wonderful it was to hear that your
recent ‘leader’ Denise Jones was playing so many games on poverty in your
wonderfully deprived area. Denise is thrilled whenever she has the chance to
tell people about how fully fledged the poverty-generation in her borough has
been. ‘The most deprived borough in the country’, she has said only last week!
I could almost hear the tangible purr of satisfaction [as the local ‘East London
Advertiser’ enchanted by Denise's’ apparent charms!, would record in their
newly-launched ‘gossip-for-our-friends’ ‘in the local council’ column] that
Denise had in her voice as she made that satisfying utterance! It had a rich mix
of career in the most poor borough ring to it as Denise confirmed her
achievements as a ‘leadership’ councillor!.....
I note that Tower Hamlets Council ‘officers’ too have been in agreement with my Govt. Like me they see
the Crossrail poverty-holes as ‘benefits’ to you poor people....
The poorer you get, the better it is for Denise Jones!
And for the Council officers. I am so
pleased that they are all so well-received [and well-receptioned!] by the
construction company people and the property speculators...
I am so glad that I had this opportunity to communicate to you from where I am... Cheer up now
as you face the holes that my Govt will be digging all over the East One
area....All Together Now : Harriet brings us the Crossrail hole ! the Diversity
hole, the Equality hole, the Liberty hole....
All thanks to Harriet Harman’s
Crossrail hole role!!!!
[To be continued]
Thursday, July 17, 2008
Crossrail hole plot and agenda-backer Harriet Harman is betraying all the values she relied on to get a career in Govt....[1]
More, here, during Friday 18 July 2008
Muhammad Haque spots a wholly inconsistent hole on Vince Cable's Lib Dems MPs side
Muhammad Haque spots a wholly inconsistent hole on Vince Cable's Lib Dems MPs side ....they are getting into the Crossrail hole of their own making or possibly of temptation under the spell of Big Business lobby active in the Houses of parliament...
[To be continued]
[To be continued]
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! electoral details LATEST ! MP seats in BOTH constituencies will be contested to stop Crossrail hole....
WHAT the KHOODEELAAR! leaflet is saying TODAY Tuesday 15 July 2008:
"
KHOODEELAAR! campaign with the community in the East End of London are going to CHANGE the local Tower Hamlets Council and STOP the ‘re-election’ or election [if new candidates] to the Council of those who support the Crossrail hole attacks agenda against the community in the East End of London....
We are going to do all we lawfully can do to make sure that no-one gets elected to the Council from the affected E1 area who supports the Crossrail hole Big Business agenda. How are we going to do that? One of the ways we are going to do that is by putting forward candidates directly for election to the council on the KHOODEELAAR! manifesto!The other way is by making John Biggs account for his role on the London Assembly. The other way is to make such an intervention in the election in the two Parliamentary seats that no candidate can get elected without a total Opposition to the Crossrail hole agenda of attacks on the East End of London.
We are looking for suitably dedicated, honest and truthful candidates to stand for Parliamentary election from Bethnal Green and Bow and from the Poplar and Limehouse constituencies. And we are preparing for a long haul constitutional law challenges THROUGH the COURTS [the High Court, the House of Lords and the European Courts: note the plural, many courts],challenges against the bureaucracies in BOTH Houses of Parliament..... To seek election as a KHOODEELAAR! candidate or to join the KHOODEELAAR! Electoral Campaign, send your details in an e-mail by 28 July 2008 to
auditpolitics@yahoo.co.uk
"
KHOODEELAAR! campaign with the community in the East End of London are going to CHANGE the local Tower Hamlets Council and STOP the ‘re-election’ or election [if new candidates] to the Council of those who support the Crossrail hole attacks agenda against the community in the East End of London....
We are going to do all we lawfully can do to make sure that no-one gets elected to the Council from the affected E1 area who supports the Crossrail hole Big Business agenda. How are we going to do that? One of the ways we are going to do that is by putting forward candidates directly for election to the council on the KHOODEELAAR! manifesto!The other way is by making John Biggs account for his role on the London Assembly. The other way is to make such an intervention in the election in the two Parliamentary seats that no candidate can get elected without a total Opposition to the Crossrail hole agenda of attacks on the East End of London.
We are looking for suitably dedicated, honest and truthful candidates to stand for Parliamentary election from Bethnal Green and Bow and from the Poplar and Limehouse constituencies. And we are preparing for a long haul constitutional law challenges THROUGH the COURTS [the High Court, the House of Lords and the European Courts: note the plural, many courts],challenges against the bureaucracies in BOTH Houses of Parliament..... To seek election as a KHOODEELAAR! candidate or to join the KHOODEELAAR! Electoral Campaign, send your details in an e-mail by 28 July 2008 to
auditpolitics@yahoo.co.uk
KHOODEELAAR! electoral details LATEST ! How to stop CROSSRAIL hole attacks on the East End of London...
WHAT the KHOODEELAAR! leaflet is saying TODAY Tuesday 15 July 2008:
"
KHOODEELAAR! campaign with the community in the East End of London are going to CHANGE the local Tower Hamlets Council and STOP the ‘re-election’ or election [if new candidates] to the Council of those who support the Crossrail hole attacks agenda against the community in the East End of London....
We are going to do all we lawfully can do to make sure that no-one gets elected to the Council from the affected E1 area who supports the Crossrail hole Big Business agenda. How are we going to do that? One of the ways we are going to do that is by putting forward candidates directly for election to the council on the KHOODEELAAR! manifesto!The other way is by making John Biggs account for his role on the London Assembly. The other way is to make such an intervention in the election in the two Parliamentary seats that no candidate can get elected without a total Opposition to the Crossrail hole agenda of attacks on the East End of London.
We are looking for suitably dedicated, honest and truthful candidates to stand for Parliamentary election from bethnal green and Bow and from the Poplar and Limehouse constituencies. And we are preparing for a long haul constitutional law challenges THROUGH the COURTS [the High Court, the House of Lords and the European Courts: note the plural, many courts],challenges against the bureaucracies in BOTH Houses of Parliament..... To seek election as a KHOODEELAAR! candidate or to join the KHOODEELAAR! Electoral Campaign, send your details in an e-mail by 28 July 2008 to
auditpolitics@yahoo.co.uk
"
KHOODEELAAR! campaign with the community in the East End of London are going to CHANGE the local Tower Hamlets Council and STOP the ‘re-election’ or election [if new candidates] to the Council of those who support the Crossrail hole attacks agenda against the community in the East End of London....
We are going to do all we lawfully can do to make sure that no-one gets elected to the Council from the affected E1 area who supports the Crossrail hole Big Business agenda. How are we going to do that? One of the ways we are going to do that is by putting forward candidates directly for election to the council on the KHOODEELAAR! manifesto!The other way is by making John Biggs account for his role on the London Assembly. The other way is to make such an intervention in the election in the two Parliamentary seats that no candidate can get elected without a total Opposition to the Crossrail hole agenda of attacks on the East End of London.
We are looking for suitably dedicated, honest and truthful candidates to stand for Parliamentary election from bethnal green and Bow and from the Poplar and Limehouse constituencies. And we are preparing for a long haul constitutional law challenges THROUGH the COURTS [the High Court, the House of Lords and the European Courts: note the plural, many courts],challenges against the bureaucracies in BOTH Houses of Parliament..... To seek election as a KHOODEELAAR! candidate or to join the KHOODEELAAR! Electoral Campaign, send your details in an e-mail by 28 July 2008 to
auditpolitics@yahoo.co.uk
Monday, July 14, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! electoral challenges in Tower Hamlets seats - next update due here at 0001 GMT Tuesday 15 July 2008
KHOODEELAAR! electoral challenges in Tower Hamlets seats - next update due here at 0001 GMT Tuesday 15 July 2008
Crossrail hole plot agenda-promoting decision by Brown was wrong. As is his latest utterance
Crossrail hole plot agenda-promoting decision by Brown was wrong. As is his latest utterance... Before examining Brown’s utterances on the widespread incidents of mainly young people killing other young people across Britain and London, let us take another updated look at how wrong Gordon Brown can be... And then I shall detail,. why Brown should stop taking part in spin and lies.... And why he should start looking at the evidence of those in publicly paid for positions....posts and platforms
By©Muhammad Haque
1810 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 July 2008
When KHOODEELAAR! advised Gordon Brown in early 2004 that he should have nothing whatever to do with the then [yet to be a hybrid Bill-ed] Crassrail scam, we had done so on accurate information we had gathered about the UK Finance ministry's attitude towards the scheme. We had found out that Brown was not supportive of Crossrail because it was not economically justified.
We ourselves have said - and demonstrated the evidence supporting what we have said - all along that the uneconomic nature of the CRASSrail scam is one of its major minus points.
So when we learnt that Brown too was thinking the same way as we had been doing, we treated Brown with a different approach. we did not call him a crass chancellor. Far less an imprudent one. For the evidence available to us in 2004 was that Brown was doing what we would have wanted him to do: say No to CRASSrail.
That line from the UK’s Ministry of Finance [the ‘Treasury’] in effect continued upto even this time last year.
A year ago, in July 2007, the second ‘most influential treasury man’ [in effect the UK’s then deputy Finance minister] as they promoted Ed Balls, was giving out hints and noises that Crossrail would have to be supported otherwise than by public funding,...
That showed that Brown was still not backing Crossrail.
For Ed Balls was nothing if not an echo of Gordon Brown at the Treasury then.
On that evidence, we were logically and evidentially totally opposed to Brown’s NEXT act. That of making utterances just like those ignorant, dishonest and corrupt touts for Big Business had sounded for the years between say February 2004 and June 2007.
Brown was coming across as a fanatical believer in a cult of CROSSRAIL!
He was saying things that the corrupt lobby and City of London elements alone had been saying for the previous 18 months or so.
There was no prudence. No evidence for the new imprudence that Brown was uttering....
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1810 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 July 2008
When KHOODEELAAR! advised Gordon Brown in early 2004 that he should have nothing whatever to do with the then [yet to be a hybrid Bill-ed] Crassrail scam, we had done so on accurate information we had gathered about the UK Finance ministry's attitude towards the scheme. We had found out that Brown was not supportive of Crossrail because it was not economically justified.
We ourselves have said - and demonstrated the evidence supporting what we have said - all along that the uneconomic nature of the CRASSrail scam is one of its major minus points.
So when we learnt that Brown too was thinking the same way as we had been doing, we treated Brown with a different approach. we did not call him a crass chancellor. Far less an imprudent one. For the evidence available to us in 2004 was that Brown was doing what we would have wanted him to do: say No to CRASSrail.
That line from the UK’s Ministry of Finance [the ‘Treasury’] in effect continued upto even this time last year.
A year ago, in July 2007, the second ‘most influential treasury man’ [in effect the UK’s then deputy Finance minister] as they promoted Ed Balls, was giving out hints and noises that Crossrail would have to be supported otherwise than by public funding,...
That showed that Brown was still not backing Crossrail.
For Ed Balls was nothing if not an echo of Gordon Brown at the Treasury then.
On that evidence, we were logically and evidentially totally opposed to Brown’s NEXT act. That of making utterances just like those ignorant, dishonest and corrupt touts for Big Business had sounded for the years between say February 2004 and June 2007.
Brown was coming across as a fanatical believer in a cult of CROSSRAIL!
He was saying things that the corrupt lobby and City of London elements alone had been saying for the previous 18 months or so.
There was no prudence. No evidence for the new imprudence that Brown was uttering....
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! accurately and correctly told Brown to say NO to Crossrail hole plot... We tell him now to say NO to all spin, hype and lies...
Crossrail hole plot agenda-promoting decision by Brown was wrong. As is his latest utterance... Before examining Brown’s utterances on the widespread incidents of mainly young people killing other young people across Britain and London, let us take another updated look at how wrong Gordon Brown can be... And then I shall detail,. why Brown should stop taking part in spin and lies.... And why he should start looking at the evidence of those in publicly paid for positions....posts and platforms
By©Muhammad Haque
1810 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 July 2008
When KHOODEELAAR! advised Gordon Brown in early 2004 that he should have nothing whatever to do with the then [yet to be a hybrid Bill-ed] Crassrail scam, we had done so on accurate information we had gathered about the UK Finance ministry's attitude towards the scheme. We had found out that Brown was not supportive of Crossrail because it was not economically justified.
We ourselves have said - and demonstrated the evidence supporting what we have said - all along that the uneconomic nature of the CRASSrail scam is one of its major minus points.
So when we learnt that Brown too was thinking the same way as we had been doing, we treated Brown with a different approach. we did not call him a crass chancellor. Far less an imprudent one. For the evidence available to us in 2004 was that Brown was doing what we would have wanted him to do: say No to CRASSrail.
That line from the UK’s Ministry of Finance [the ‘Treasury’] in effect continued upto even this time last year.
A year ago, in July 2007, the second ‘most influential treasury man’ [in effect the UK’s then deputy Finance minister] as they promoted Ed Balls, was giving out hints and noises that Crossrail would have to be supported otherwise than by public funding,...
That showed that Brown was still not backing Crossrail.
For Ed Balls was nothing if not an echo of Gordon Brown at the Treasury then.
On that evidence, we were logically and evidentially totally opposed to Brown’s NEXT act. That of making utterances just like those ignorant, dishonest and corrupt touts for Big Business had sounded for the years between say February 2004 and June 2007.
Brown was coming across as a fanatical believer in a cult of CROSSRAIL!
He was saying things that the corrupt lobby and City of London elements alone had been saying for the previous 18 months or so.
There was no prudence. No evidence for the new imprudence that Brown was uttering....
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1810 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 July 2008
When KHOODEELAAR! advised Gordon Brown in early 2004 that he should have nothing whatever to do with the then [yet to be a hybrid Bill-ed] Crassrail scam, we had done so on accurate information we had gathered about the UK Finance ministry's attitude towards the scheme. We had found out that Brown was not supportive of Crossrail because it was not economically justified.
We ourselves have said - and demonstrated the evidence supporting what we have said - all along that the uneconomic nature of the CRASSrail scam is one of its major minus points.
So when we learnt that Brown too was thinking the same way as we had been doing, we treated Brown with a different approach. we did not call him a crass chancellor. Far less an imprudent one. For the evidence available to us in 2004 was that Brown was doing what we would have wanted him to do: say No to CRASSrail.
That line from the UK’s Ministry of Finance [the ‘Treasury’] in effect continued upto even this time last year.
A year ago, in July 2007, the second ‘most influential treasury man’ [in effect the UK’s then deputy Finance minister] as they promoted Ed Balls, was giving out hints and noises that Crossrail would have to be supported otherwise than by public funding,...
That showed that Brown was still not backing Crossrail.
For Ed Balls was nothing if not an echo of Gordon Brown at the Treasury then.
On that evidence, we were logically and evidentially totally opposed to Brown’s NEXT act. That of making utterances just like those ignorant, dishonest and corrupt touts for Big Business had sounded for the years between say February 2004 and June 2007.
Brown was coming across as a fanatical believer in a cult of CROSSRAIL!
He was saying things that the corrupt lobby and City of London elements alone had been saying for the previous 18 months or so.
There was no prudence. No evidence for the new imprudence that Brown was uttering....
[To be continued]
Tribunal finds Tower Hamlets Council guilty of bias against 'older' people..IN EFFECT just as crass as in inviting CROSSRAIL hole attacks...
1630 Hrs GMT London Monday 14 July 2008:KHOODEELAAR! NO to Crassly controlled Crossrail hole-plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council clique: The latest publication by the journal PERSONNEL TODAY points out that Tower Hamlets Council has already gone into denial about the Employment tribunal's finding in the JOHN WOOSTER case... That denial is contained in a report today [Monday 14 July 2008] we have here linked to [see the column next to this] .. KHOODEELAAR! analysis covers aspects that are not confined to just age discrimination We look at the outfit, EastEnd Homes. In context... Eastend Homes is one of the outfits that the corrupt clique on Tower hamlets Council has allowed to be set up. This has been in order to carry out in effect the Margaret Thatcher agenda of dismantling society. Those safeguards and securities and rights that are associated with social or public ownership of services. By attacking those services, those safeties, those rights and legal protection, society-on-the-ground has been weakened in Tower Hamlets. The result, the consequences have been seen in the steady and the mounting deterioration in the quality of life in the Borough... We look at those wider implications... Not confined to the particular case of John Wooster [To be continued]
Sunday, July 13, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! to contest East London parliamentary seats at the next elections, to stop Crossrail hole agenda
KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘Crossrail hole plot-attacks on the East End of London..’ CAMPAIGN to get active in contesting elections in Tower Hamlets MP seats!
Details on the KHOODEELAAR! web site this Sunday lunchtime! at 1200 Hrs GMT today 13 July 2008:
[To be continued]
Details on the KHOODEELAAR! web site this Sunday lunchtime! at 1200 Hrs GMT today 13 July 2008:
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! is set to get active in elections in East London seats, next! To stop Crossrail hole plot against the East End...
0615 GMT 0715 UKTime London Sunday 13 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole plot agenda …..” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! That the Blairing cliques on the London local councils controlled in the name of the former Labour Party by operatives impersonating ‘local councils’ are doing damage to the very local communities in whose name they abuse their positions.What does that abuse mean? For the communities, for individuals, for families in the boroughs affected? And a great deal of disservice, it means bad service. Or no service. How do they do so? How do these get away with misleading the ‘local’ communities? One of the persistent ways that they do it is by ‘taking advantage’ of the absence of active councillors on the same councils. As KHOODEELAAR! has reported for the past 55 months since our campaign against Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London began [on 31 January 2004], the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council has been IN A STATE OF POLITICAL AND DEMOCRATIC MORASS in terms of an ‘elected collection of councillors speaking out for and representing the local community’. That morass is getting even worse by the week… Things are so bad that there is now no ‘official opposition’ on Tower Hamlets Council. Why? Is it because the existing ‘elected councillors’ who belong to allegedly [indeed as alleged!!!] opposition parties all set to ‘defect’ to the controlling ‘grouping’? Not as such. NOT Yet. But there is no opposition. No political opposition… Was that foreseen before the last ‘election’ held in May 2006? KHOODEELAAR! had foreseen that. But the ‘politically active opposition parties who were fielding candidates allegedly against the controlling grouping’ did not want to see the truth. They were also culturally hostile to the idea of a real campaign. They preferred to pretend to be radical, opposition and so on while in fact CRAVING to be in ‘position’…. And the result is that there is no NO POSITION… Politically speaking, democratically speaking, even aesthetically, linguistically, conceptually speaking, there is no POSITION on anything from any alleged opposition… on the Tower Hopeless Council…..Which is why the KHOODEELAAR! campaign is now considering one strategy, that of supporting named candidates at the scheduled council election due next in 2010 …[To be continued]
Saturday, July 12, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! is set to get active in Tower Hamlets Council elections, next! To stop Crossrail hole plot against the East End...
0615 GMT 0715 UKTime London Sunday 13 July 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole plot agenda …..” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO!
That the Blairing cliques on the London local councils controlled in the name of the former Labour Party by operatives impersonating ‘local councils’ are doing damage to the very local communities in whose name they abuse their positions.What does that abuse mean? For the communities, for individuals, for families in the boroughs affected? And a great deal of disservice, it means bad service. Or no service. How do they do so? How do these get away with misleading the ‘local’ communities?
One of the persistent ways that they do it is by ‘taking advantage’ of the absence of active councillors on the same councils.
As KHOODEELAAR! has reported for the past 55 months since our campaign against Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London began [on 31 January 2004], the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council has been IN A STATE OF POLITICAL AND DEMOCRATIC MORASS in terms of an ‘elected collection of councillors speaking out for and representing the local community’. That morass is getting even worse by the week…
Things are so bad that there is now no ‘official opposition’ on Tower Hamlets Council. Why? Is it because the existing ‘elected councillors’ who belong to allegedly [indeed as alleged!!!] opposition parties all set to ‘defect’ to the controlling ‘grouping’? Not as such. NOT Yet. But there is no opposition. No political opposition… Was that foreseen before the last ‘election’ held in May 2006? KHOODEELAAR! had foreseen that. But the ‘politically active opposition parties who were fielding candidates allegedly against the controlling grouping’ did not want to see the truth. They were also culturally hostile to the idea of a real campaign. They preferred to pretend to be radical, opposition and so on while in fact CRAVING to be in ‘position’…. And the result is that there is no NO POSITION… Politically speaking, democratically speaking, even aesthetically, linguistically, conceptually speaking, there is no POSITION on anything from any alleged opposition… on the Tower Hopeless Council…..Which is why the KHOODEELAAR! campaign is now considering one strategy, that of supporting named candidates at the scheduled council election due next in 2010 …[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole plot agenda …..” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO!
That the Blairing cliques on the London local councils controlled in the name of the former Labour Party by operatives impersonating ‘local councils’ are doing damage to the very local communities in whose name they abuse their positions.What does that abuse mean? For the communities, for individuals, for families in the boroughs affected? And a great deal of disservice, it means bad service. Or no service. How do they do so? How do these get away with misleading the ‘local’ communities?
One of the persistent ways that they do it is by ‘taking advantage’ of the absence of active councillors on the same councils.
As KHOODEELAAR! has reported for the past 55 months since our campaign against Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London began [on 31 January 2004], the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council has been IN A STATE OF POLITICAL AND DEMOCRATIC MORASS in terms of an ‘elected collection of councillors speaking out for and representing the local community’. That morass is getting even worse by the week…
Things are so bad that there is now no ‘official opposition’ on Tower Hamlets Council. Why? Is it because the existing ‘elected councillors’ who belong to allegedly [indeed as alleged!!!] opposition parties all set to ‘defect’ to the controlling ‘grouping’? Not as such. NOT Yet. But there is no opposition. No political opposition… Was that foreseen before the last ‘election’ held in May 2006? KHOODEELAAR! had foreseen that. But the ‘politically active opposition parties who were fielding candidates allegedly against the controlling grouping’ did not want to see the truth. They were also culturally hostile to the idea of a real campaign. They preferred to pretend to be radical, opposition and so on while in fact CRAVING to be in ‘position’…. And the result is that there is no NO POSITION… Politically speaking, democratically speaking, even aesthetically, linguistically, conceptually speaking, there is no POSITION on anything from any alleged opposition… on the Tower Hopeless Council…..Which is why the KHOODEELAAR! campaign is now considering one strategy, that of supporting named candidates at the scheduled council election due next in 2010 …[To be continued]
NETWORK RAIL has been caught acting as CHEAT WORK rail! As CHEAT WORK Rail is close to 'Crossrail' pluggers, we say: SCRAP CRASSRAIL!
By©Muhammad Haque
0530 GMT
London Sunday 13 July 2008
NETWORK RAIL is involved with ‘Crossrail'. How has it been behaving? Has it been found to have been as callous and unreliable? INDEED.
As the evidence represented in one scandal that has been found in Islington:
NETWORK is CHEATWORK rail. As NETWORK RAIL AND Islington council ‘planning’ staff have been caught [see the full text of the report from an Islington based publication, we reproduced below] CHEATING the community in Islington, we ask again: how much more evidence of corruption should be found before the failing, wasteful outfits are either disposed of or their ‘contracts’ seriously reviewed and then rescinded and done away with? How much more evidence of Council ‘planners’ behaving against transparency and community rights and good finance before they are given the overdue SACK that they deserve? How much more losses must be allowed to be caused to the local environment, the local economy before CHEATWORK RAIL are given the marching orders and stopped from looting the public while the needs of the community are neglected?
[To be continued]
Islington Tribune - by PETER GRUNER
Published: 11 July 2008
Footbridge study was ‘duplicitous’
A CONTROVERSIAL £60,000 feasibility study into a footbridge that could unite communities on either side of King’s Cross station was already “weighted against the scheme” before it was launched, according to claims this week.
Network Rail ruled out the £5million footbridge last month – promised originally in plans for the railway land redevelopment – on the grounds of costs and security complications.
But campaigners argued this week that the original brief for the study was “unneces sarily complicated”.
Islington Labour councillor Paul Convery, chairman of the west area planning committee, accused Network Rail and Camden planners, who provided the brief for the feasibility study, of being “duplicitous”.
He added: “The planners didn’t look at a simple bridge which would have stretched across the station from one side to another and which is what the residents wanted.
“Instead they looked at a complicated version with access to several platforms. Obviously that would have created a security nightmare and be costly. So the whole scheme was dropped.”
* The scheme will be discussed at a meeting by the King’s Cross Rail Group on Thursday at the Blessed Sacrament Church in Copenhagen Street, Barnsbury, at 7pm.
Comment on this article.
0530 GMT
London Sunday 13 July 2008
NETWORK RAIL is involved with ‘Crossrail'. How has it been behaving? Has it been found to have been as callous and unreliable? INDEED.
As the evidence represented in one scandal that has been found in Islington:
NETWORK is CHEATWORK rail. As NETWORK RAIL AND Islington council ‘planning’ staff have been caught [see the full text of the report from an Islington based publication, we reproduced below] CHEATING the community in Islington, we ask again: how much more evidence of corruption should be found before the failing, wasteful outfits are either disposed of or their ‘contracts’ seriously reviewed and then rescinded and done away with? How much more evidence of Council ‘planners’ behaving against transparency and community rights and good finance before they are given the overdue SACK that they deserve? How much more losses must be allowed to be caused to the local environment, the local economy before CHEATWORK RAIL are given the marching orders and stopped from looting the public while the needs of the community are neglected?
[To be continued]
Islington Tribune - by PETER GRUNER
Published: 11 July 2008
Footbridge study was ‘duplicitous’
A CONTROVERSIAL £60,000 feasibility study into a footbridge that could unite communities on either side of King’s Cross station was already “weighted against the scheme” before it was launched, according to claims this week.
Network Rail ruled out the £5million footbridge last month – promised originally in plans for the railway land redevelopment – on the grounds of costs and security complications.
But campaigners argued this week that the original brief for the study was “unneces sarily complicated”.
Islington Labour councillor Paul Convery, chairman of the west area planning committee, accused Network Rail and Camden planners, who provided the brief for the feasibility study, of being “duplicitous”.
He added: “The planners didn’t look at a simple bridge which would have stretched across the station from one side to another and which is what the residents wanted.
“Instead they looked at a complicated version with access to several platforms. Obviously that would have created a security nightmare and be costly. So the whole scheme was dropped.”
* The scheme will be discussed at a meeting by the King’s Cross Rail Group on Thursday at the Blessed Sacrament Church in Copenhagen Street, Barnsbury, at 7pm.
Comment on this article.
NETWORK RAIL has been caught acting as CHEAT WORK rail! As CHEAT WORK Rail is close to 'Crossrail' pluggers, we say: SCRAP CRASSRAIL!
Depriving inner cities, or worse, ADDING to poverty in the inner cities, like Crossrail hole/s, is not the way forward, Gordon!
By©Muhammad Haque
2235 Hrs GMT
London Saturday
12 July 2008
Gordon Brown is defying all reasonable, lawful and constitutional advice, evidence e and warnings to him about his ill-advised ‘commitment to the Crossrail hole plot.
Why is he doing so?
There is no answer in what he has said so far on Crossrail.
As we have been publishing daily, there CAN BE NO EVIDENCE in support of Brown’s commitment to the London Crossrail.
It is a poverty-creating project.
It is at variance with his stated opposition to poverty.
Why then is Brown sticking by Crossrail?
We have to look at other possible causes.
Including his state of mind. We shall go to a psychological site in the next parts.
For this part,w e refer to Zimbabwe and the Sino-Russian veto on sanctions move that the USA and Brown had tabled.
Will Gordon Brown be ‘vindicated’ over the Russian veto ‘freeze’ [as Brown claimed in the House of Commons speech in effect] over the USA-UK move at the Security Council to vote for sanctions against Robert Mugabe-fronted regime? This is a question that has arisen because the Russians used their veto and opposed the USA-UK move to have the sanctions imposed against Zimbabwe.
What the final ‘evidence’ published may show about Gordon Brown’s ‘deal ‘ with Moscow’s Dmitry Medvedev before the security council vote, is not known. Yet. But nobody is waiting for the final evidence to be published before making comments on Gordon Brown’s judgement!.
Despite his ‘diplomatic’ words, alleging unanimity across ‘British politics’ [Hague’s phrase!!!] on the issue of Zimbabwe, the Tory spokesperson on world affairs William Hague has already [during today Saturday 12 July 2008] fuelled speculation into the truth of what actually happened at the G8 summit where Brown allegedly bagged the Russians' support against Mugabe.
Whatever the actual facts, the comments mill is at full spin. So much so that the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been aware of it. Thus asking: how is it that Gordon Brown can be subjected to such intense analysis on everything else but not on CROSSRAIL?
[To be continued]
What exactly is the secret of this ‘eternal unanimity’ [my words] across ‘British politics’ [my, Muhammad HAQUE;s, as different from William Hague’s, phrase!]
"
Islington Tribune - by PETER GRUNER
Published: 11 July 2008
Footbridge study was ‘duplicitous’
A CONTROVERSIAL £60,000 feasibility study into a footbridge that could unite communities on either side of King’s Cross station was already “weighted against the scheme” before it was launched, according to claims this week.
Network Rail ruled out the £5million footbridge last month – promised originally in plans for the railway land redevelopment – on the grounds of costs and security complications.
But campaigners argued this week that the original brief for the study was “unneces sarily complicated”.
Islington Labour councillor Paul Convery, chairman of the west area planning committee, accused Network Rail and Camden planners, who provided the brief for the feasibility study, of being “duplicitous”.
He added: “The planners didn’t look at a simple bridge which would have stretched across the station from one side to another and which is what the residents wanted.
“Instead they looked at a complicated version with access to several platforms. Obviously that would have created a security nightmare and be costly. So the whole scheme was dropped.”
* The scheme will be discussed at a meeting by the King’s Cross Rail Group on Thursday at the Blessed Sacrament Church in Copenhagen Street, Barnsbury, at 7pm.
Comment on this article.
"
By©Muhammad Haque
2235 Hrs GMT
London Saturday
12 July 2008
Gordon Brown is defying all reasonable, lawful and constitutional advice, evidence e and warnings to him about his ill-advised ‘commitment to the Crossrail hole plot.
Why is he doing so?
There is no answer in what he has said so far on Crossrail.
As we have been publishing daily, there CAN BE NO EVIDENCE in support of Brown’s commitment to the London Crossrail.
It is a poverty-creating project.
It is at variance with his stated opposition to poverty.
Why then is Brown sticking by Crossrail?
We have to look at other possible causes.
Including his state of mind. We shall go to a psychological site in the next parts.
For this part,w e refer to Zimbabwe and the Sino-Russian veto on sanctions move that the USA and Brown had tabled.
Will Gordon Brown be ‘vindicated’ over the Russian veto ‘freeze’ [as Brown claimed in the House of Commons speech in effect] over the USA-UK move at the Security Council to vote for sanctions against Robert Mugabe-fronted regime? This is a question that has arisen because the Russians used their veto and opposed the USA-UK move to have the sanctions imposed against Zimbabwe.
What the final ‘evidence’ published may show about Gordon Brown’s ‘deal ‘ with Moscow’s Dmitry Medvedev before the security council vote, is not known. Yet. But nobody is waiting for the final evidence to be published before making comments on Gordon Brown’s judgement!.
Despite his ‘diplomatic’ words, alleging unanimity across ‘British politics’ [Hague’s phrase!!!] on the issue of Zimbabwe, the Tory spokesperson on world affairs William Hague has already [during today Saturday 12 July 2008] fuelled speculation into the truth of what actually happened at the G8 summit where Brown allegedly bagged the Russians' support against Mugabe.
Whatever the actual facts, the comments mill is at full spin. So much so that the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been aware of it. Thus asking: how is it that Gordon Brown can be subjected to such intense analysis on everything else but not on CROSSRAIL?
[To be continued]
What exactly is the secret of this ‘eternal unanimity’ [my words] across ‘British politics’ [my, Muhammad HAQUE;s, as different from William Hague’s, phrase!]
"
Islington Tribune - by PETER GRUNER
Published: 11 July 2008
Footbridge study was ‘duplicitous’
A CONTROVERSIAL £60,000 feasibility study into a footbridge that could unite communities on either side of King’s Cross station was already “weighted against the scheme” before it was launched, according to claims this week.
Network Rail ruled out the £5million footbridge last month – promised originally in plans for the railway land redevelopment – on the grounds of costs and security complications.
But campaigners argued this week that the original brief for the study was “unneces sarily complicated”.
Islington Labour councillor Paul Convery, chairman of the west area planning committee, accused Network Rail and Camden planners, who provided the brief for the feasibility study, of being “duplicitous”.
He added: “The planners didn’t look at a simple bridge which would have stretched across the station from one side to another and which is what the residents wanted.
“Instead they looked at a complicated version with access to several platforms. Obviously that would have created a security nightmare and be costly. So the whole scheme was dropped.”
* The scheme will be discussed at a meeting by the King’s Cross Rail Group on Thursday at the Blessed Sacrament Church in Copenhagen Street, Barnsbury, at 7pm.
Comment on this article.
"
Is Gordon Brown miraculously immune from all charges, so long as he sticks by his backing for the CRASS Crossrail hole plot, London?
Depriving inner cities, or worse, ADDING to poverty in the inner cities, like Crossrail hole/s, is not the way forward, Gordon!
By©Muhammad Haque
2235 Hrs GMT
London Saturday
12 July 2008
Gordon Brown is defying all reasonable, lawful and constitutional advice, evidence e and warnings to him about his ill-advised ‘commitment to the Crossrail hole plot.
Why is he doing so?
There is no answer in what he has said so far on Crossrail.
As we have been publishing daily, there CAN BE NO EVIDENCE in support of Brown’s commitment to the London Crossrail.
It is a poverty-creating project.
It is at variance with his stated opposition to poverty.
Why then is Brown sticking by Crossrail?
We have to look at other possible causes.
Including his state of mind. We shall go to a psychological site in the next parts.
For this part,w e refer to Zimbabwe and the Sino-Russian veto on sanctions move that the USA and Brown had tabled.
Will Gordon Brown be ‘vindicated’ over the Russian veto ‘freeze’ [as Brown claimed in the House of Commons speech in effect] over the USA-UK move at the Security Council to vote for sanctions against Robert Mugabe-fronted regime? This is a question that has arisen because the Russians used their veto and opposed the USA-UK move to have the sanctions imposed against Zimbabwe.
What the final ‘evidence’ published may show about Gordon Brown’s ‘deal ‘ with Moscow’s Dmitry Medvedev before the security council vote, is not known. Yet. But nobody is waiting for the final evidence to be published before making comments on Gordon Brown’s judgement!.
Despite his ‘diplomatic’ words, alleging unanimity across ‘British politics’ [Hague’s phrase!!!] on the issue of Zimbabwe, the Tory spokesperson on world affairs William Hague has already [during today Saturday 12 July 2008] fuelled speculation into the truth of what actually happened at the G8 summit where Brown allegedly bagged the Russians' support against Mugabe.
Whatever the actual facts, the comments mill is at full spin. So much so that the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been aware of it. Thus asking: how is it that Gordon Brown can be subjected to such intense analysis on everything else but not on CROSSRAIL?
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
2235 Hrs GMT
London Saturday
12 July 2008
Gordon Brown is defying all reasonable, lawful and constitutional advice, evidence e and warnings to him about his ill-advised ‘commitment to the Crossrail hole plot.
Why is he doing so?
There is no answer in what he has said so far on Crossrail.
As we have been publishing daily, there CAN BE NO EVIDENCE in support of Brown’s commitment to the London Crossrail.
It is a poverty-creating project.
It is at variance with his stated opposition to poverty.
Why then is Brown sticking by Crossrail?
We have to look at other possible causes.
Including his state of mind. We shall go to a psychological site in the next parts.
For this part,w e refer to Zimbabwe and the Sino-Russian veto on sanctions move that the USA and Brown had tabled.
Will Gordon Brown be ‘vindicated’ over the Russian veto ‘freeze’ [as Brown claimed in the House of Commons speech in effect] over the USA-UK move at the Security Council to vote for sanctions against Robert Mugabe-fronted regime? This is a question that has arisen because the Russians used their veto and opposed the USA-UK move to have the sanctions imposed against Zimbabwe.
What the final ‘evidence’ published may show about Gordon Brown’s ‘deal ‘ with Moscow’s Dmitry Medvedev before the security council vote, is not known. Yet. But nobody is waiting for the final evidence to be published before making comments on Gordon Brown’s judgement!.
Despite his ‘diplomatic’ words, alleging unanimity across ‘British politics’ [Hague’s phrase!!!] on the issue of Zimbabwe, the Tory spokesperson on world affairs William Hague has already [during today Saturday 12 July 2008] fuelled speculation into the truth of what actually happened at the G8 summit where Brown allegedly bagged the Russians' support against Mugabe.
Whatever the actual facts, the comments mill is at full spin. So much so that the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been aware of it. Thus asking: how is it that Gordon Brown can be subjected to such intense analysis on everything else but not on CROSSRAIL?
[To be continued]
As Gordon Brown's judgement AGAIN comes under attack, how can it be that he is infallible on Crossrail hole plot alone?
As Gordon Brown's judgement AGAIN comes under attack, how can it be that he is infallible on Crossrail hole plot alone?
More, here, shortly
More, here, shortly
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
Saturday, 12 July 2008
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
2000 GMT 2100 UK Time London Saturday 12 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! is the reasonable, ordinary, common sense, lawful, legal, constitutional, ethical, moral environmental CAMPAIGN against waste of public resource by the UK Government that is being operated by elements inside the Govt bureaucracies who are in fact representative of Big Business the Big businesses have bought the soul and the minds and the attention of the decision -makers within the Govt...
KHOODEELAAR! is the antidote to all of that and above all, KHOODEELAAR! is the unique audit of the holders of 'elected office' in the name of inner city East End of London...
What KHOODEELAAR! says today on the facts, on the evidence and on the empirical studies and the factual updates of the situation concerning the ongoing imposition of poverty-creating activities via the local Tower Hamlets Council and via the other ‘power’-linked ‘holders’ of elected posts and the recipients of profitable [personally to them and at the expense of the community across the East End of London ] unelected but sub-legitimate and QUANGO-ed linked posts and connections, will be vindicated tomorrow.
The Khoodeelaar! movement is part of the same empirical foundation whence Tony McNulty, the 'minister' currently being used to front the assault on civil liberties and fundamental rights in Britain under the pretext of protecting the UK from 'greater threats to society' [=’Counter-Terrorism Bill 2008’] , had been questioned YEARS earlier about the Blairing SQUANDERING of the peoples’ mandate. The mandate as it had been expressed in May 1997....
. Khoodeelaar! has pointed out in the course of the 55 months of the campaign against Crossrail hole plot and agenda so far, the various personal and equally unpublicised other links that McNulty has with the controlling clique on and in Tower Hamlets Council.... It is via those links that McNulty would have been acquainted with the realties on the grounds of poverty and the role in creating poverty that the Council and its allied bureaucracies played...McNulty was also present at an otherwise innocent location [the Altab Ali Park] almost 3 years ago when he posed for publicity photographs near the site of one of the underground explosions that cost the innocent peoples’ lives... So McNulty has been in ‘touch’ with elements in Tower Hamlets IN THE NAME of Government as well....
Some of those who appeared with him in the series of promotional photos and related ‘facilities’ events, would be included among McNulty’s links... It was not just his own reported wife, Christine Gilbert who was still employed in the Tower Hamlets Council [as ‘chief executive’ - she was given that job despite not being the best candidate, because some key controlling clique members who appointed her, found her to be willing to overlook the conduct of the key controlling cliqusters] that McNulty would have ‘consulted’ about the 'situation'... Khoodeelaar! has evidence showing that McNulty knows quite a few individuals that are close to or are at the centre of the clique in control of Tower Hamlets CROSSRAIL hole plot-INVITING Council.... And he would therefore know that the area is not going to welcome another deprivation programme which is what the Crossrail, hole plot is... So what role has McNulty played in the actual drafting of what is now known as the hole-imposing ‘Crossrail Bill’? He was in the Crossrail hole plot-peddling DfT [=UK ‘Department for Transport’, then fronted by the current UK Finance Minister Alistair Darling] in 2004-2005... We shall examine further McNulty’s crucial role in the planned further creation of poverty in the East End of London via the implementation - and the imposition - of the Crossrail hole plot and programme. We shall look at McNulty’s linked role in the erosion of fundamental civil liberties that McNulty is now being used to front in the fanatical way that he has been. We shall show in context the serious and far reaching adverse and disproportionate effect on the community in the East End of London that BOTH pieces of McNulty-linked and over-hyped Blairing legislation will have:...... [To be continued]
Posted by AADHIKARonline London UK April 2007 at 13:08 0 com
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
2000 GMT 2100 UK Time London Saturday 12 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! is the reasonable, ordinary, common sense, lawful, legal, constitutional, ethical, moral environmental CAMPAIGN against waste of public resource by the UK Government that is being operated by elements inside the Govt bureaucracies who are in fact representative of Big Business the Big businesses have bought the soul and the minds and the attention of the decision -makers within the Govt...
KHOODEELAAR! is the antidote to all of that and above all, KHOODEELAAR! is the unique audit of the holders of 'elected office' in the name of inner city East End of London...
What KHOODEELAAR! says today on the facts, on the evidence and on the empirical studies and the factual updates of the situation concerning the ongoing imposition of poverty-creating activities via the local Tower Hamlets Council and via the other ‘power’-linked ‘holders’ of elected posts and the recipients of profitable [personally to them and at the expense of the community across the East End of London ] unelected but sub-legitimate and QUANGO-ed linked posts and connections, will be vindicated tomorrow.
The Khoodeelaar! movement is part of the same empirical foundation whence Tony McNulty, the 'minister' currently being used to front the assault on civil liberties and fundamental rights in Britain under the pretext of protecting the UK from 'greater threats to society' [=’Counter-Terrorism Bill 2008’] , had been questioned YEARS earlier about the Blairing SQUANDERING of the peoples’ mandate. The mandate as it had been expressed in May 1997....
. Khoodeelaar! has pointed out in the course of the 55 months of the campaign against Crossrail hole plot and agenda so far, the various personal and equally unpublicised other links that McNulty has with the controlling clique on and in Tower Hamlets Council.... It is via those links that McNulty would have been acquainted with the realties on the grounds of poverty and the role in creating poverty that the Council and its allied bureaucracies played...McNulty was also present at an otherwise innocent location [the Altab Ali Park] almost 3 years ago when he posed for publicity photographs near the site of one of the underground explosions that cost the innocent peoples’ lives... So McNulty has been in ‘touch’ with elements in Tower Hamlets IN THE NAME of Government as well....
Some of those who appeared with him in the series of promotional photos and related ‘facilities’ events, would be included among McNulty’s links... It was not just his own reported wife, Christine Gilbert who was still employed in the Tower Hamlets Council [as ‘chief executive’ - she was given that job despite not being the best candidate, because some key controlling clique members who appointed her, found her to be willing to overlook the conduct of the key controlling cliqusters] that McNulty would have ‘consulted’ about the 'situation'... Khoodeelaar! has evidence showing that McNulty knows quite a few individuals that are close to or are at the centre of the clique in control of Tower Hamlets CROSSRAIL hole plot-INVITING Council.... And he would therefore know that the area is not going to welcome another deprivation programme which is what the Crossrail, hole plot is... So what role has McNulty played in the actual drafting of what is now known as the hole-imposing ‘Crossrail Bill’? He was in the Crossrail hole plot-peddling DfT [=UK ‘Department for Transport’, then fronted by the current UK Finance Minister Alistair Darling] in 2004-2005... We shall examine further McNulty’s crucial role in the planned further creation of poverty in the East End of London via the implementation - and the imposition - of the Crossrail hole plot and programme. We shall look at McNulty’s linked role in the erosion of fundamental civil liberties that McNulty is now being used to front in the fanatical way that he has been. We shall show in context the serious and far reaching adverse and disproportionate effect on the community in the East End of London that BOTH pieces of McNulty-linked and over-hyped Blairing legislation will have:...... [To be continued]
Posted by AADHIKARonline London UK April 2007 at 13:08 0 com
Friday, July 11, 2008
Crossrail hole Bill 'draft'-'writer' Tony McNulty now 'writes' to do away with civil liberties in Britain....
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties 'minister' Tony McNulty?
the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....
By©Muhammad Haque
2045 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?
Why is this question being asked?
The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.
First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.
McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.
Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]
By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.
Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.
Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.
Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.
And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.
What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?
Because that was what he was saying!
Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.
Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.
Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.
No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.
In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.
Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].
No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.
McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.
I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….
Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.
It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.
He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.
The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’
McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.
And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.
Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.
It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.
This is worrying.
How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies belief…
[To be continued]
the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....
By©Muhammad Haque
2045 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?
Why is this question being asked?
The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.
First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.
McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.
Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]
By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.
Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.
Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.
Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.
And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.
What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?
Because that was what he was saying!
Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.
Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.
Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.
No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.
In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.
Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].
No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.
McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.
I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….
Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.
It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.
He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.
The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’
McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.
And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.
Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.
It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.
This is worrying.
How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies belief…
[To be continued]
Crossrail hole Bill 'draft'-'writer' Tony McNulty now 'writes' to do away with civil liberties in Britain....
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties 'minister' Tony McNulty?
the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....
By©Muhammad Haque
2045 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?
Why is this question being asked?
The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.
First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.
McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.
Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]
By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.
Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.
Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.
Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.
And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.
What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?
Because that was what he was saying!
Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.
Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.
Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.
No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.
In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.
Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].
No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.
McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.
I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….
Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.
It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.
He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.
The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’
McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.
And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.
Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.
It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.
This is worrying.
How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies believe…
[To be continued]
the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....
By©Muhammad Haque
2045 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?
Why is this question being asked?
The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.
First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.
McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.
Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]
By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.
Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.
Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.
Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.
And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.
What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?
Because that was what he was saying!
Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.
Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.
Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.
No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.
In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.
Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].
No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.
McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.
I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….
Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.
It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.
He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.
The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’
McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.
And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.
Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.
It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.
This is worrying.
How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies believe…
[To be continued]
Boris Johnson has got to know what his Party Chair Francis Maude said AGAINST the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London
Boris Johnson has got to know what his Party Chair Francis Maude said AGAINST the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London
1320 GMT 1420 UK London Friday 11 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! action archive of the MUHAMMAD HAQUE interview of the then Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude [still an MP in the UK House fo Commons].on what he and his Part would say and o against the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End fo London The interview was conducted in Brick Lane London E1 and published in transcript in the same afternoon on Monday 24 April 2006....In the two years and two months since then, we have observed the behaviour of the Conservative Party in the UK Parliament,.. An updater commentary on that will appear here soon. First the interview with Francis Maude [see below] [To be continued]
AADHIKARonline transcript of the question and answer between Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque and Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude, in Brick Lane London E1 at 1210 Hrs appx GMT on Monday 24 April 2006
Transcript posted on aadhikaronline web pages at 1345 Hrs GMT Monday 24 April 2006
1. Muhammad Haque [Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 area No to Crossrail hole Bill] : Hello can I ask you a Question from Khoodeelaar?
Francis Maude: Yes. Do.
2. Muhammad Haque: [Khoodeelaar is] the Campaign against Crossrail hole [in the Brick Lane London E1 area]
3. Muhammad Haque What would you say is your Party’s position?
Francis Maude: Well, we’re very much in favour of CrossRail… which we think can deliver very serious benefits to the area but we’re concerned that there shouldn’t be [slight stammer] all of the digging up of [slight stammer] the [Brick Lane London E1 ] area to make it happen, We don’t see that it’s necessary.
4. Muhammad Haque: Do you believe Alistair Darling's
Francis Maude: No
5. Muhammad Haque: [UK Transport Secretary – the Crossrail hole Minister] Alistair Darling’s statement, said in a written statement on 30 March [2006] what do you say to that?
Francis Maude: No. You see that’s simply pre-election [hesitation]] manoeuvring. I wouldn't trust anything he [Alistair Darling] says.
6. .Muhammad Haque: Are you going to take it up as a formal motion against his
Francis Maude: my colleagues are. My colleagues will be. Thank you very much.
7 Muhammad Haque: When do you expect to do that?
Francis Maude: Well, very soon.
”
1320 GMT 1420 UK London Friday 11 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! action archive of the MUHAMMAD HAQUE interview of the then Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude [still an MP in the UK House fo Commons].on what he and his Part would say and o against the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End fo London The interview was conducted in Brick Lane London E1 and published in transcript in the same afternoon on Monday 24 April 2006....In the two years and two months since then, we have observed the behaviour of the Conservative Party in the UK Parliament,.. An updater commentary on that will appear here soon. First the interview with Francis Maude [see below] [To be continued]
AADHIKARonline transcript of the question and answer between Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque and Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude, in Brick Lane London E1 at 1210 Hrs appx GMT on Monday 24 April 2006
Transcript posted on aadhikaronline web pages at 1345 Hrs GMT Monday 24 April 2006
1. Muhammad Haque [Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 area No to Crossrail hole Bill] : Hello can I ask you a Question from Khoodeelaar?
Francis Maude: Yes. Do.
2. Muhammad Haque: [Khoodeelaar is] the Campaign against Crossrail hole [in the Brick Lane London E1 area]
3. Muhammad Haque What would you say is your Party’s position?
Francis Maude: Well, we’re very much in favour of CrossRail… which we think can deliver very serious benefits to the area but we’re concerned that there shouldn’t be [slight stammer] all of the digging up of [slight stammer] the [Brick Lane London E1 ] area to make it happen, We don’t see that it’s necessary.
4. Muhammad Haque: Do you believe Alistair Darling's
Francis Maude: No
5. Muhammad Haque: [UK Transport Secretary – the Crossrail hole Minister] Alistair Darling’s statement, said in a written statement on 30 March [2006] what do you say to that?
Francis Maude: No. You see that’s simply pre-election [hesitation]] manoeuvring. I wouldn't trust anything he [Alistair Darling] says.
6. .Muhammad Haque: Are you going to take it up as a formal motion against his
Francis Maude: my colleagues are. My colleagues will be. Thank you very much.
7 Muhammad Haque: When do you expect to do that?
Francis Maude: Well, very soon.
”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the 'Crossrail Bill' [a Bill in UK Parliament]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SGqe5VQwLHI/AAAAAAAABfc/MEjjMWby2dc/S226/Khoodeelaar!+try+this+logo.gif)
![London [Rupert Murdoched] Times, Wed. 7 May 2008](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitiFRN6uO_MOdYMby0s7ow2zcBaewOKfl3k4QdCPcahu1IKXx6sl7Gs4aO9VrAhN8gQJvYb1a2JnODsTUsMks_LtoZVuqc64whMkMitNKVz1bijPST853uNwRNG8x2PVFl1kqRez8M3b-j/s226/1676149.jpg)
