UK Lib Dumbs fail to live with Brian Paddick telling truth against CRASSrail! They shut him up on that !

0735 Hrs GMT O835 Hrs UK London Saturday 5 April 2008:
Khoodeelaar! No to CRASSrailing, unconstitutional, sleazy, corrupting 'mainstream' and SIDEstream' British political parties' 'groupings' CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! About the Lib Dems' 'position' on CRASSrail On January 12 2008 Khoodeelaar! published the comment saying that it was astonishing to note [via Croydon Guardian] that Brian Paddick had made a comment critical of Crossrail....! Now, less than three months on, the Lib Dumbs have returned to their Crossrail-inviting hole of political irrelevance and collusion with Big business and the assortments of sleazeballs that parade as political representatives in the UK 'democracy. UK DUMMOCRACY, more like... .....As the Lib Dumbs keep showing themselves to be part of and party [in both senses] to....

[To be continued]









By©Muhammad Haque
0655 GMT
London Saturday 5 April 2008



On another Saturday, in january 2008, I had reason to refer to the UK 'mainstream' 'political party' the Lib Dems in the context of our campaign against the Crossrail hole.

I was not convinced, as I wrote then, that their 'party' candidate Brian Paddick, had quite understood how corrupt the Lib Dumbs' party machine was.

Here I am reproducing the main ‘Croydon Guardian’ web site piece on which I commented and the comment itself.

Why today?


Because the Lib Dumbs HAVE made sure to shut Paddick up on Crossrail. As far as Crassrail was concerned, they have belatedly realised, [after counting the numbers of sexual partners that Calamity Clegg has had or rechecking on the moral compass of Sarah T who has displayed such allegedly accurate knowledge despite her mother ‘watching’ Sarah T’s focus] about the frequency of sexual contacts between Tony Blair and Cherie Booth!] Paddick must only tell lies, thus making Paddick eat the bit of truth about Crossrail that he had said and the bit that I had found out about.


"
I am writing to put on the record my sense of utter astonishment at coming across a quotation in your item apparently reporting the position on Crossrail as taken by Brian Paddock, one of the candidates at the scheduled 1 May 2008 election for the ‘post of mayor of London’.

You quote him as follows:-

“There's a bias against commuters in south west London. Money going into projects like Crossrail don't benefit them at all," he said.

Did he actually say those words?

I am only asking this because in the period since he has been the declared candidate for the post for the Liberal Democrats, Mr Paddick has not come across as making any similar statement about Crossrail. This is very serious.

Also, when he appeared on the ITV programme ' packaged as a ‘debate’ between the three candidates including Mr Paddick and Boris Johnson and the incumbent Ken Livingstone, Mr Paddick was the one that opted OUT of that segment of the broadcast programme which was dedicated to the issue of CROSSRAIL.

In fact Crossrail was the subject that was shown on the ITV programme to have caused one of the main ‘forceful’ exchanges between Johnson and Livingstone, with Brian Paddick fading out of focus!

So what is the point that he is making in the statement you attribute to him?

Also, he has NOT made any comment similar to the one you report him as having made apparently questioning the cost of Crossrail, about the Crossrail scheme in relation to the main role played by all the ‘ Lib Dem spokespersons’ on transport in London as evident on their records .

Nor did Mr Paddick question the promotion of Crossrail that was sung by Lib Deems MP Susan Kramer at the ‘Third Reading’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as held in the House of Commons on 13 December 2007.

Equally, Mr Paddick has not disowned, on the record and in public the position on Crossrail as exhibited by any of the others in the Lib Dems party who have been part of the parade of the pro-Crossrail lobby over the past four years.

That parade has included the Lib Dem MP Lynne Featherstone who in 2005-2006 was one of the very few MPs that went to the verge of hysteria in denouncing both Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling for their alleged reluctance to provide the public funding for the Crossrail scheme.

Muhammad Haque
Organiser
KHOODEELAAR!
The East London Campaign Against the Crossrail ‘hole plot’ Bill
1545 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 12 January 2008




Quote | Report this post

The CROYDON GUARDIAN web site had carried the piece as follows:

Paddick and Blair make up ahead of election
Exclusive By Dan Menhinnitt
Comment | Read Comments (8)

Lib Dems mayoral candidate Brian Paddick
Mayoral hopeful Brian Paddick says he has buried the hatchet with his old boss Met Commissioner Sir Ian Blair.

Mr Paddick, a former Lambeth borough commander who went to Sutton Manor High School, retired after clashing with Ian Blair over the handling of the Jean Charles de Menezes shooting in July, 2005.

In an exclusive interview with yourlocalguardian.co.uk the 49-year-old says he met with Commissioner Blair recently and the pair are now on good terms.

"I think we are both adult enough that if I was mayor and he Commissioner we could work together," he said.

He added that the meeting went so well Sir Ian dismissed his notetaker.

Speaking at yourlocalguardian.co.uk's Sutton offices he also said south west Londoners can expect an improved and safer transport system if he wins the May election.

advertisement




The Lib Dem candidate said he would end transport policies which only favoured central London and draft in police to tackle teen crime on buses.

"There's a bias against commuters in south west London. Money going into projects like Crossrail don't benefit them at all," he said.

He added: "Some people in the south west are paying much more for journeys under the current zone structure. I want a fair fare for commuters in south west London."

According to Mr Paddick transport priorities would be decided in consultation with local councils and elected officials.

He also said he wanted to see more police officers on bus routes known to suffer from antisocial behaviour, and advocated removing free travel from teen troublemakers.

"I want to take away the right to free travel from those who abuse it rather than a blanket ban on free travel for teens."

And despite the pressures of getting ready to launch his mayoral campaign on Monday he still had time to pop in and visit his 87-year-old mum.

"She lives just round the corner in Sutton. She'd never forgive me if I came to here and didn't pop in and see her," he joked.


Quote | Report this post


Posted by: Muhammad Haque, London UK on 3:47pm Sat 12 Jan 08
quote
I am writing to put on the record my sense of utter astonishment at coming across a quotation in your item apparently reporting the position on Crossrail as taken by Brian Paddock, one of the candidates at the scheduled 1 May 2008 election for the ‘post of mayor of London’.

You quote him as follows:-

“There's a bias against commuters in south west London. Money going into projects like Crossrail don't benefit them at all," he said.

Did he actually say those words?

I am only asking this because in the period since he has been the declared candidate for the post for the Liberal Democrats, Mr Paddick has not come across as making any similar statement about Crossrail. This is very serious.

Also, when he appeared on the ITV programme ' packaged as a ‘debate’ between the three candidates including Mr Paddick and Boris Johnson and the incumbent Ken Livingstone, Mr Paddick was the one that opted OUT of that segment of the broadcast programme which was dedicated to the issue of CROSSRAIL.

In fact Crossrail was the subject that was shown on the ITV programme to have caused one of the main ‘forceful’ exchanges between Johnson and Livingstone, with Brian Paddick fading out of focus!

So what is the point that he is making in the statement you attribute to him?

Also, he has NOT made any comment similar to the one you report him as having made apparently questioning the cost of Crossrail, about the Crossrail scheme in relation to the main role played by all the ‘ Lib Dem spokespersons’ on transport in London as evident on their records .

Nor did Mr Paddick question the promotion of Crossrail that was sung by Lib Deems MP Susan Kramer at the ‘Third Reading’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as held in the House of Commons on 13 December 2007.

Equally, Mr Paddick has not disowned, on the record and in public the position on Crossrail as exhibited by any of the others in the Lib Dems party who have been part of the parade of the pro-Crossrail lobby over the past four years.

That parade has included the Lib Dem MP Lynne Featherstone who in 2005-2006 was one of the very few MPs that went to the verge of hysteria in denouncing both Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling for their alleged reluctance to provide the public funding for the Crossrail scheme.

Muhammad Haque
Organiser
KHOODEELAAR!
The East London Campaign Against the Crossrail ‘hole plot’ Bill
1545 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 12 January 2008


"

Slipperal Democrats can't stand it when 'their' 'London mayor' candidate Paddick told the truth about Calamity Crossrail!

0210 Hrs GMT 0310 Hrs UK London Saturday 5 April 2008:KHOODEELAAR! Told you so!


The Lib Dumbs! have confirmed the accurate doubt Khoodeelaar! had expressed about Brian Paddick’s flash of truthfulness on calamity CRASSrail…

It seems that after TWO occasions of telling the truth about Crossrail, Paddick has been reined in by the calamitous Clegg regime… to be consigned to the role of being yet another sleaze-ball candidate to serve the interest of Big Business and assortments of sleazy politicians…

Paddick no longer can make even a small note to history in the representation of the people of and in London….

On with the campaign against ALL the touts posing as candidate for the trust of the people of and in London….

[To be continued]

The crassly conceived, seriously flawed CROSSRAIl scam is intellectually stalled....Yet Ken Livingstone hyped it wildly..Why??

Editor©Muhammad Haque

Crossrail crassness shown in con Livingstone's crafty silence on world class crash closing in on the capitalist market square mile misleadingly and corruptingly called the City of London...[it is not the London Town or the Metropolitan city of London, which is the bigger picture of London.

The ‘city of London’ is a small part situated within one square mile as they saying goes, sandwiched between the bigger borough called the City of Westminster to the west south, by the borough of Islington to the north, and the boroughs of Hackney and Tower Hamlets to the north east and to the east.

It is this tiny bit of London called the ‘City of London’ where the main practices of capitalist corruption and offences and plots against democracy take place under covers of financial trade and services]

Ken Livingstone has been colluding with the City of London interests for his own career.

It has been one of the key reasons why Livingstone has served as the chief propaganda tout for CRASSrail.

Because the City of London is made up of Big business agencies who want to get their hands on £Billions of public cash... That is why they have been parading Livingstone as, in their cynical language, the ‘lefty they could do business with’. And what a successful track record of business dealings they have created by employing Livingstone s their mouthpiece.


And Gerald Ronson is not by any means the only property speculating user of Ken Livingstone's ‘socialist loyalty’ in gaining planning consents for multi-£1MILLION scams located in the City of London ....

AND in the CRASS role player con Livingstone's silence on persistent failures by ALL the inner city ‘state’ schools where the majority of the failed, let down and dis-schooled youngsters are to be found in parts that Big Business have targeted for takeover under Crossrail agenda and similar pretexts.

[To be continued]