By©Muhammad Haque
1312 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday 13 May 2008
Remember this: Frank Field is claiming all the credits for the pressure on Gordon Brown on behalf of the poor.
Then think again: does Frank Field really side with the poor.
If Gordon Brown and Alistair darling are guilty of attacking the poor then Frank Field too should be held responsible.
Ever since Field got fired as a so-called welfare reform minister [he blames Brown for the sacking] Field has tried to make a side career as an expert.
But what is the man’s expertise?
True that he is an expert at getting the media platforms.
But what does he actually know about the British welfare system?
I would say that Frank Field is a fraud.
in fact Frank Field is a benefit fraud.
Frank Field does not know about welfare and he most certainly is no friend of the poor.
It is about time that the fraudulent Frank Field were exposed.
The first thing that needs to be understood about welfare in Britain is this: what does it amount to ?
Does welfare exist ?
Yes, people are on benefits. There are benefits.
But what do these benefits mean in real terms?
And how do people get into this state?
What has Frank Field to say about this?
When did he say anything about the cause of poverty and the link between poverty and the state?
And what was his solution to poverty?
Does the state create poverty?
If it does then shouldn't we be addressing the state creation of poverty rather than the people who are pushed into poverty?
And what exactly is wealth?
Where does wealth come from?
Is there a secret tunnel through which wealth travels?
These questions ought to be asked and the answers to them sought from Frank Field.
But the media platforms that are given to him are not fronted - or set - by those who want to ask the questions far less to demand the answers.
In fact BOTH Brown and Field are on the side of the state dominating the level of peoples’ rights, if there are any left.
Because if they asked the questions, they would find that like the NHS, the principles underlying the setting up of the welfare side to the state, have never been respected by the state.
Or by Big Business that dies set the agenda of the behaviour of the state.
And with the passage of time and with the revival of the very greed and the very capitalistic corruption at the centre of the state, the institutions that did tend to make society civilised, have been undermined by the holders of power in the state.
And that is why Frank Field was a failure as a welfare reform minister. Because he is a servant of the status quo.
And the status quo is the same among all the three parties in the so-called democratic parliament.
The result is that when Brown disposed of the so-called 10p rate, they did not mount any opposition to it.
Only by accident did the 10p change become a topic of temporary political moment.
[To be continued]
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Frank Field is a backer of Big Business, a causer of state-controlled poverty and hardship. Frank Field is a key Benefit Fraudster...
By©Muhammad Haque
1312 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday 13 May 2008
Remember this: Frank Field is claiming all the credits for the pressure on Gordon Brown on behalf of the poor.
Then think again: does Frank Field really side with the poor.
If Gordon Brown and Alistair darling are guilty of attacking the poor then Frank Field too should be held responsible.
Ever since Field got fired as a so-called welfare reform minister [he blames Brown for the sacking] Field has tried to make a side career as an expert.
But what is the man’s expertise?
True that he is an expert at getting the media platforms.
But what does he actually know about the British welfare system?
I would say that Frank Field is a fraud.
in fact Frank Field is a benefit fraud.
Frank Field does not know about welfare and he most certainly is no friend of the poor.
It is about time that the fraudulent Frank Field were exposed.
The first thing that needs to be understood about welfare in Britain is this: what does it amount to ?
Does welfare exist ?
Yes, people are on benefits. There are benefits.
But what do these benefits mean in real terms?
And how do people get into this state?
What has Frank Field to say about this?
When did he say anything about the cause of poverty and the link between poverty and the state?
And what was his solution to poverty?
Does the state create poverty?
If it dies then shouldn't we be addressing the state creation of poverty rather than the people who are pushed into poverty?
And what exactly is wealth?
Where does wealth come from?
Is there a secret tunnel through which wealth travels?
These questions ought to be asked and the answers to them sought from Frank Field.
But the media platforms that are given to him are not fronted - or set - by those who want to ask the questions far less to demand the answers.
In fact BOTH Brown and Field are on the side of the state dominating the level of peoples’ rights, if there are any left.
Because if they asked the questions, they would find that like the NHS, the principles underlying the setting up of the welfare side to the state, have never been respected by the state.
Or by Big Business that dies set the agenda of the behaviour of the state.
And with the passage of time and with the revival of the very greed and the very capitalistic corruption at the centre of the state, the institutions that did tend to make society civilised, have been undermined by the holders of power in the state.
And that is why Frank Field was a failure as a welfare reform minister. Because he is a servant of the status quo.
And the status quo is the same among all the three parties in the so-called democratic parliament.
The result is that when Brown disposed of the so-called 10p rate, they did not mount any opposition to it.
Only by accident did the 10p change become a topic of temporary political moment.
[To be continued]
1312 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday 13 May 2008
Remember this: Frank Field is claiming all the credits for the pressure on Gordon Brown on behalf of the poor.
Then think again: does Frank Field really side with the poor.
If Gordon Brown and Alistair darling are guilty of attacking the poor then Frank Field too should be held responsible.
Ever since Field got fired as a so-called welfare reform minister [he blames Brown for the sacking] Field has tried to make a side career as an expert.
But what is the man’s expertise?
True that he is an expert at getting the media platforms.
But what does he actually know about the British welfare system?
I would say that Frank Field is a fraud.
in fact Frank Field is a benefit fraud.
Frank Field does not know about welfare and he most certainly is no friend of the poor.
It is about time that the fraudulent Frank Field were exposed.
The first thing that needs to be understood about welfare in Britain is this: what does it amount to ?
Does welfare exist ?
Yes, people are on benefits. There are benefits.
But what do these benefits mean in real terms?
And how do people get into this state?
What has Frank Field to say about this?
When did he say anything about the cause of poverty and the link between poverty and the state?
And what was his solution to poverty?
Does the state create poverty?
If it dies then shouldn't we be addressing the state creation of poverty rather than the people who are pushed into poverty?
And what exactly is wealth?
Where does wealth come from?
Is there a secret tunnel through which wealth travels?
These questions ought to be asked and the answers to them sought from Frank Field.
But the media platforms that are given to him are not fronted - or set - by those who want to ask the questions far less to demand the answers.
In fact BOTH Brown and Field are on the side of the state dominating the level of peoples’ rights, if there are any left.
Because if they asked the questions, they would find that like the NHS, the principles underlying the setting up of the welfare side to the state, have never been respected by the state.
Or by Big Business that dies set the agenda of the behaviour of the state.
And with the passage of time and with the revival of the very greed and the very capitalistic corruption at the centre of the state, the institutions that did tend to make society civilised, have been undermined by the holders of power in the state.
And that is why Frank Field was a failure as a welfare reform minister. Because he is a servant of the status quo.
And the status quo is the same among all the three parties in the so-called democratic parliament.
The result is that when Brown disposed of the so-called 10p rate, they did not mount any opposition to it.
Only by accident did the 10p change become a topic of temporary political moment.
[To be continued]
Why Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole-inviter Council has had no 'opposition leadership' on the Council -
By©Muhammad Haque
1055 Hrs GMT
London Tuesday
13 May 2008
[Continuing from the previous item about Tower Hamlets Council published here this morning]
Just how solid is that ‘belief’? Or, rather. how sound is that ground for that ‘belief’ by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council that there is no ‘alternative’ to the current clique, that may take over the Council at the next coun cil election?
The ‘candidates’ have not spoken yet.
But by looking at the behaviour of the ‘candidates’ it is reasonable to say that they feel that they are not vincible. That they will, remain in the ‘majority’ group and they will ‘reign’ in the Tower Hamlets Borough!
And why should they feel so confident?
Part of the reason is to be found in what janet did!
Janet Ludlow!
Ludlow was allegedly the ‘leader of the group that was known as the ‘official opposition’ on Tower Hamlets Council upto the May 2006 council election.
She had anything upto 16 councillors including herself, that belonged, on paper, to the same group. They were treated as the official opposition on Tower Hamlets Coun cil...
But did they oppose?
And if they did, did the voters notice their opposition?
This could not be tested more comprehensively than on the matter of the Janet Ludlow role on Crossrail hole plot....
Khoodeelaar! campaign has published quite a significant number of pieces about Janet Ludlow’s role.
In fact, not even the ‘local’ ‘East London Idiotiser’ has written so much about Janet Ludlow.
We examine her role in context, next
[To be continued]
1055 Hrs GMT
London Tuesday
13 May 2008
[Continuing from the previous item about Tower Hamlets Council published here this morning]
Just how solid is that ‘belief’? Or, rather. how sound is that ground for that ‘belief’ by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council that there is no ‘alternative’ to the current clique, that may take over the Council at the next coun cil election?
The ‘candidates’ have not spoken yet.
But by looking at the behaviour of the ‘candidates’ it is reasonable to say that they feel that they are not vincible. That they will, remain in the ‘majority’ group and they will ‘reign’ in the Tower Hamlets Borough!
And why should they feel so confident?
Part of the reason is to be found in what janet did!
Janet Ludlow!
Ludlow was allegedly the ‘leader of the group that was known as the ‘official opposition’ on Tower Hamlets Council upto the May 2006 council election.
She had anything upto 16 councillors including herself, that belonged, on paper, to the same group. They were treated as the official opposition on Tower Hamlets Coun cil...
But did they oppose?
And if they did, did the voters notice their opposition?
This could not be tested more comprehensively than on the matter of the Janet Ludlow role on Crossrail hole plot....
Khoodeelaar! campaign has published quite a significant number of pieces about Janet Ludlow’s role.
In fact, not even the ‘local’ ‘East London Idiotiser’ has written so much about Janet Ludlow.
We examine her role in context, next
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! updating the democratic warning to Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole-inviter Council: you are heading for that hole....!
By©Muhammad Haque
1030 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 13 May 2008
One of the key reasons for the creation in january 2004 of the Khoodeelaar! campaign in defence of the Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area and against the “Crossrail hole plot-imposing Big Business agenda has been the prevalence of poverty-creation in the policies of the Blairing administration....
In the course of the four years and four months of the Khoodeelaar! campaign, we have done the research and we have done the information gathering...
And we have done the constitution-examining...
In doing all these, we have been actively involved with the people directly affected by the plans and we have kept a daily watch on the behaviour of the ‘elected’ ‘local’ councillors...
Councillors who DEPEND on the votes of these people for their being councillors...
We have found that one after another, the councillors have lied.....
Why have they lied?
They have lied because they have been told to lie. Told by who?
Told to lie by the corrupt clique that controls the real agenda of the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council...
And who are these councillors?
These are councillors that are in the ‘controlling’ group and they are quite blasé because they ‘believe’ that there is no party or group that is principled, competent, efficient and or honest enough to replace them at the next council election.
[To be continued]
1030 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 13 May 2008
One of the key reasons for the creation in january 2004 of the Khoodeelaar! campaign in defence of the Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area and against the “Crossrail hole plot-imposing Big Business agenda has been the prevalence of poverty-creation in the policies of the Blairing administration....
In the course of the four years and four months of the Khoodeelaar! campaign, we have done the research and we have done the information gathering...
And we have done the constitution-examining...
In doing all these, we have been actively involved with the people directly affected by the plans and we have kept a daily watch on the behaviour of the ‘elected’ ‘local’ councillors...
Councillors who DEPEND on the votes of these people for their being councillors...
We have found that one after another, the councillors have lied.....
Why have they lied?
They have lied because they have been told to lie. Told by who?
Told to lie by the corrupt clique that controls the real agenda of the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council...
And who are these councillors?
These are councillors that are in the ‘controlling’ group and they are quite blasé because they ‘believe’ that there is no party or group that is principled, competent, efficient and or honest enough to replace them at the next council election.
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! constitutional law action against the Big Business-colluding, Crossrail hole-peddler bureaucracy in the UK House of Lords
0840 Hrs GMT 0940 Hrs UK Time London Tuesday 13 May 2008:
Khoodeelaar! constitutional law action against the "Crossrail Bill" [now in the UK legislative 'House of Lords' ]
ACTION ARCHIVE and update about the clear, consistent, constitutional law advice that we have been giving to the 'local' East London borough of Tower Hamlets COUNCIl on how it, 'Tower Hamlets Council' could save 'face' and stop colluding with the Crossrail hole plotters..... This week [starting on Monday 12 May 2008] Khoodeelaar! is serving the final and the updated 'letters before claim' procedures and demands on the 'Tower Hamlets Council' and on the bureaucracies at Transport for London, at the Cross London Rail Links [= CLRL] company and at the Department for Transport .... These letters before claim are the last stages before we start the applications to the London High court......
And then take the matter through all the stages of the 'UK domestic court system' before the matter being referred to the European courts.....
Khoodeelaar! constitutional law action against the "Crossrail Bill" [now in the UK legislative 'House of Lords' ]
ACTION ARCHIVE and update about the clear, consistent, constitutional law advice that we have been giving to the 'local' East London borough of Tower Hamlets COUNCIl on how it, 'Tower Hamlets Council' could save 'face' and stop colluding with the Crossrail hole plotters..... This week [starting on Monday 12 May 2008] Khoodeelaar! is serving the final and the updated 'letters before claim' procedures and demands on the 'Tower Hamlets Council' and on the bureaucracies at Transport for London, at the Cross London Rail Links [= CLRL] company and at the Department for Transport .... These letters before claim are the last stages before we start the applications to the London High court......
And then take the matter through all the stages of the 'UK domestic court system' before the matter being referred to the European courts.....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the 'Crossrail Bill' [a Bill in UK Parliament]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SGqe5VQwLHI/AAAAAAAABfc/MEjjMWby2dc/S226/Khoodeelaar!+try+this+logo.gif)
![London [Rupert Murdoched] Times, Wed. 7 May 2008](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitiFRN6uO_MOdYMby0s7ow2zcBaewOKfl3k4QdCPcahu1IKXx6sl7Gs4aO9VrAhN8gQJvYb1a2JnODsTUsMks_LtoZVuqc64whMkMitNKVz1bijPST853uNwRNG8x2PVFl1kqRez8M3b-j/s226/1676149.jpg)
