As the degenerating, poverty-creating, Big Business Crossrail hole agenda gets MPs rubber stamp on Tuesday, how the media have lied, hidden the truth

By©Muhammad Haque 0435 Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 July 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘Corral hole Big Business agenda’ CAMPAIGN has pointed out for years that the so-called ‘prudent financial journal’ the FT was a platform of corrupt journalism, often misleading the ‘readers’ on the actual economic conditions, trends and the correlated facts, events and plots In the context of the Big Business Crassrail hole plot, the FT has published lies.

Just like the London EVENING Nostandards STANDARD, the FT has published fabricated accounts on the cots, the need and the relevance of the Crassrail hole project. The FT is frequently promoted as having been written by ‘professional journalist’ who are socially aware , in fact even ‘conventionally left wing’. This is another lie. The FT is corrupt. And the record of the FT’s corruption is to be found on its pages [as well as in its so-called special reports published] throughout its existence. The FT and the Guardian have been parts of the so-called mainstream British media triumvirate along with the BBC which has afforded space to the other falsely painted left wing time serving agent of Big Business capitalism, Ken Livingstone. The FT, the Guardian and the BBC have failed to tell the truth on the domestic economic and asocial conditions... Just as Saturday’s ‘journalism’ showed, even the Rupert Murdoch Times did a better piece of financial journalism than the FT did. Or the BBC. Or the Guardian. That interview with the UK Finance minister - and the bringer of the CRASSrail Bill Alistair Darling, would have been the sort of reporting that the FT should have been able to do. The agenda on the FT has never been clear. It is coloured pink but it is also morally very very dubious. The result is that the FT misspeaks ... By peddling the wasteful obsolete and bogus Crossrail scam, the FT is serving the secret ‘constituency’;, the Big Business while failing to report on the transport needs, the economic needs and the capacities. If Gordon Brown or Alistair Darling [whichever is the ‘face’] fails to make the right decisions, then the ‘ atmosphere of public opinion’ in which they do so will have been as much their fault as it will be the fault of the FT, the Guardian and the BBC... The fault being to tell the truth about the economic facts.... and the social and democratic adverse effects of making the wrong economic decisions...


The FT, the Guardian and the BBC have all been pretence-’sympathiser’ with the ‘socially excluded’ but they are as corrupt and as much on the side of the economic and the social degenerators as their more obvious ‘rival’ publications and media are and have been...

The BBC, the FT and the Guardian NEED there to be social disparities... So that they can then practise [as claiming, falsely, to be concerned for social justice which they NEVER are about] their corrupt craft of playing at being ‘sympathetic. Their corruption of society stinks Because they collude with the creators of social deprivation by making the economic disparity.... As they are showing by their wring and unjustified and unjust promotion of Crossrail which will be another big vehicle to apply to widen the social and economic discrimination, bias and disparities in and AGAINST communities and people in inner city areas like in the East End of London... [To be continued]


THIS EDITION was last updated at 0435 GMT London SUNDAY 20 July 2008

BBC Radio 4 PM programme has just confessed to the fact that there is an economic mess: Why t won’t the BBC tell the truth on the wasteful Crossrail

THis AADHIKARonline page was last edited at 1635 GMT Saturday 19 July 2008


By©Muhammd Haque
1635 GMT
London saturday 19 July 2008
The Crossrail hole scam-backing BBC Radio 4 PM programme has just confessed the economy is in a mess because of borrowing....

Question is: Why, then, won’t the BBC tell the truth about the AVOIDABLE public sector BORROWING to the tunes of £Billions that the wasteful Crossrail will IMPOSE on the economy and the public?

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN gives Boris Johnson another timely advice : DO NOT follow Ken Livingstone in squandering £BIllions

THIS AADHIKARonline page was last edited at 1435 GMT Saturday 19 July 2008



By©©Muhammad Haque
1400 Hrs GMT 1500 Hrs UK Time London Saturday 19 July 2008:


KHOODEELAAR! analysis of crassly conceived Crossrail London BIG BUSINESS City o London SCAM is echoed by the Glasgow Herald and their analysts...By©Muhammad Haque 1400 GMT London Saturday 19 July 2008::A [Glasgow] Herald item from 2007 is as relevant in July 2008 about one of the lies that Crossrail hole plot- Big Business agenda-touts uttered as their argument for £Billions of UK public money to be given to BiG Business...


That lie was given especially frenzied coverage by the cRASSLy edited [!!!!] London EVENING NOSTANDARDS Standard when Ken Livingstone added his lying skills and joined the sub-racist campaign against Scotland as a whole. Livingstone the chameleon posed as a fanatic English nationalist, verging on the peripheries of the Dagenham people with whom he picked fights too in his desperate bid to a appear keen to be all pc [‘politically correct’] in all sorts of contradictory ways. Livingstone came unstuck on the Scottish prejudice issue...

But he did cause damage to anti-racist thinking... And why would Livingstone back any racist lie to ‘justify’ a Big Business London Crossrail hole ploy to loot the UK public? Why else than to get ‘votes’ of course !!!!???


But Livingstone reckoned without the Tories... Even by Livingstone's own sub-racist record, the Tories could out-racist Livingstone any time. Or at any election...!!! As he has found out.... For the first time in his really parasitic career of 40 years in de facto public-paid positions in the name of London, Ken Livingstone was actually comprehensively defeated for the first significant time at an election held under ‘normal British conditions’. That is my way of summing up what constitutes the norm for a British election.

Although the perennially perniciously lying Guardian and some of its den of liars’ more s paraders of the cult of Livingstone have refused to accept the result of the 1 May 2008 London Assembly and ‘mayor’ election. Almost reminiscent of the cheer-leading propaganda outfits in regions of the world where democracy even by the normal British conditions, is not allowed, the Guardian newspaper group in London has refused to recognise the 1 May 2008 election results because the voters were seen to have voted for someone other than the incumbent that the lying Guardian preferred....

Livingstone’s resort to sub-racist anti-Scottish desperation was unmistakable in 2007. We have shown at every stage that Crossrail is crass because it is essentially NOT about solving the transport needs of London.... We have said and SHOWN this since 31 January 2004 when the KHOODEELAAR! campaign actually began in the Brick Lane....Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 area....

.In the 55 months since January 2004, we have referred to and shown the evidence of hundreds of other intervening items to substantiate our thesis that Crossrail was CRASSrail. So when Livingstone took refuse in the sub-racist tent and berated the Scots collectively for what he suggested was the Scots’ greed at the expense of the English, any reasonable, honest and competent student of the reality of the UK could see that Livingstone was wrong on every level... and that Livingstone could only have been motivated in his sub-racist attack on the Scots by petty personal careerism and greed for the perils and the ‘power’ of office..... For the purpose of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail hole plot in London, Livingstone's dire sub-racisim too showed that CROSSRAIL, London was crassly conceived. That it had to be 'justified' by inciting sub-racist prejudice against people hundreds of miles away from London, PROVED, AGAIN, that the London Crossrail scam was NOT FOUNDED PRIMARILY on the urgent transport needs of the people of and in London. ........
[To be continued]