In the first response sent to the Timesonline, Muhammad Haque has said [at 2215 Hrs GMT] the following to Simon Jenkins' propaganda [which, as usual, reads like an extension of the scripted agenda of Big Business interests] piece for the wasteful post of mayor in the name of London:-
"
Every city needs a Ken v Boris show – it brings local politics back to life
"
Really?
What life?
Charade! Charade! and wasteful, costly and irrelevant charade!
On all counts flaunted by Simon Jenkins, the bureaucracy of a ‘mayor of London’ has been a denial of democracy.
To say the least!
Unless of course Mr Jenkins means “for career courtesans and assorted plastic promoters and propagandists” in “the media”.
The coverage Mr Jenkins boastfully promotes has been to cover up the truth. To conceal the disgraceful abuse of access to public cash and the propensity to waste it in cultivating a corrupt career and entourage.
Neither the 2012 Olympics nor Crossrail is an achievement Neither has been a response to ordinary peoples’ demand or needs.
Neither the 2012 Olympics nor Crossrail is a reality. BOTH are doomed to discredit their peddlers.
Neither ‘project’ [in fact SCAM] has been causally or democratically linked with there being a mayor in the name of London.
Both are products of lobbys ['lobbies']. Big Business, antidemocratic . lobbys [='lobbies'] and vested interests.
Neither can be afforded by any British city in the ordinary sense of economic capacity. Neither deserves to be peddled to any urban centre
"
Saturday, April 19, 2008
After Brown was compared extensively to having been obscured by the Pope’s visit of the USA, can Brown salvage his sunken reputation..?
After Brown was compared extensively to having been obscured by the Pope’s visit to the USA, has Gordon Brown the ethics, the morality to live down being ridiculed by a 'peer' who has no morality of his own? immoral 'peer'?
By©Muhammad Haque
1650 GMT
London Saturday 19 April 2008
Gordon Brown suffers from the same [what is the term I am in fact meaning to use here?] ignorance that destroyed the objectively tested credibility of all the predecessors in occupation at No 10 Downing Street. ...
The fact that I am again pointing this out does not mean that Brown will get out of his ignorance.
Let alone that he will apologise for being so ignorant about the world and about the society in Britain....
As I have said many times already since Brown ignorantly and very embarrassingly boasted in Africa that he had nothing to apologise for when it came to the British Empire, that showed that Brown really was no different from Blair.
In fact, Brown may typify a worse political backwardness than even the perennially delusional and lying Blair ever did.....
Now that is indeed very worrying.
For Britain and for the world.
For Britain because it still is the tail that the Military Industrial Complex and the Pentagon use to test the state of their reality-linking with the rest of the world.
It is not just in relation to their dealings with ‘Europe’ that the MIC-Pentagon [= MICP] use ‘Britain’ and their White House-'cooked [cf: GW Bush and his sick-makingly cynical ‘joke’ about him and ‘Laura’ cooking ‘up a meal’ for Brown] ‘relationship’ for...
Entire continents of Australia, Africa and Asia are contaminated with the active, the living legacies of [what is the term I am in fact meaning to use here?] grand plans and strategies that were devised by Gordon Brown’s predecessors in power in Britain over the past 500 years....
Perhaps a truthful and an honest student of the world of the past 2000 years would have used a totally different phrase than what Brown used in his boastful utterances as made in Africa...
Of course humility would not pass Brown’s lips [whether they existed in reality or metaphorically] when he would address the peoples’ of Africa and Asia and in particular the peoples of what is now called Australia....
Not to begin with the peoples that were genocided out of existence in what is now the North American region...
If Brown HAD that wisdom and that knowledge and that ethics then he could begin to say that he deserved to be referred to with at least a semblance of moral recognition.
Especially by the likes of what was astonishingly referred to this past week by the Daily Mail, the EVENING standardless STANDARD, the ITV news as a ‘senior’ ‘Labour’ [=presumably they mean what used to be knows the Labour Party ] ‘peer’ in the shape of the immoral and the corrupting petty-careerist linked with the Lousy Scandalising site at the expense of Education [=LSE], a time-server call Meghnad Desai!
Now to be compared unfavourably with Meghnad Desai, as Brown has been this past week during Brown’s much needed diversionary trip abroad in the USA, is to be extremely seriously condemned....
Meghnad Desai is no source of morality. Nor is he a political scientist of any integrity whatever. And he most certainly is no economist. But he has been transformed into these morally ‘higher’ levels and locations by the ‘media’ in the course of a few seconds when he was utilised by particular elements who needed a ‘Labour’-linked entity, however discreditable, to pour scorn at Brown’s integrity, ability, competence and vision.... [not to even b begin to dissect Brown's decade long claim to 'prudence']....
And they were spot on...
And the blame lies with Brown himself...
For Brown has made his own career by aligning himself with the mainstream brigades of [what is the generic term I am in fact meaning to use here?] in what used to be the Labour Party and also the ‘Labour movement’...
Those [what is the generic term I am in fact meaning to use here?] were responsible for the prominence that has been accorded to the phenomenally ignorant likes of Epoch Powell...
Incredibly, Brown is not in the minority as a [what is the term I am in fact meaning to use here?] in the Labour Movement [that includes the MorninG Scar]
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1650 GMT
London Saturday 19 April 2008
Gordon Brown suffers from the same [what is the term I am in fact meaning to use here?] ignorance that destroyed the objectively tested credibility of all the predecessors in occupation at No 10 Downing Street. ...
The fact that I am again pointing this out does not mean that Brown will get out of his ignorance.
Let alone that he will apologise for being so ignorant about the world and about the society in Britain....
As I have said many times already since Brown ignorantly and very embarrassingly boasted in Africa that he had nothing to apologise for when it came to the British Empire, that showed that Brown really was no different from Blair.
In fact, Brown may typify a worse political backwardness than even the perennially delusional and lying Blair ever did.....
Now that is indeed very worrying.
For Britain and for the world.
For Britain because it still is the tail that the Military Industrial Complex and the Pentagon use to test the state of their reality-linking with the rest of the world.
It is not just in relation to their dealings with ‘Europe’ that the MIC-Pentagon [= MICP] use ‘Britain’ and their White House-'cooked [cf: GW Bush and his sick-makingly cynical ‘joke’ about him and ‘Laura’ cooking ‘up a meal’ for Brown] ‘relationship’ for...
Entire continents of Australia, Africa and Asia are contaminated with the active, the living legacies of [what is the term I am in fact meaning to use here?] grand plans and strategies that were devised by Gordon Brown’s predecessors in power in Britain over the past 500 years....
Perhaps a truthful and an honest student of the world of the past 2000 years would have used a totally different phrase than what Brown used in his boastful utterances as made in Africa...
Of course humility would not pass Brown’s lips [whether they existed in reality or metaphorically] when he would address the peoples’ of Africa and Asia and in particular the peoples of what is now called Australia....
Not to begin with the peoples that were genocided out of existence in what is now the North American region...
If Brown HAD that wisdom and that knowledge and that ethics then he could begin to say that he deserved to be referred to with at least a semblance of moral recognition.
Especially by the likes of what was astonishingly referred to this past week by the Daily Mail, the EVENING standardless STANDARD, the ITV news as a ‘senior’ ‘Labour’ [=presumably they mean what used to be knows the Labour Party ] ‘peer’ in the shape of the immoral and the corrupting petty-careerist linked with the Lousy Scandalising site at the expense of Education [=LSE], a time-server call Meghnad Desai!
Now to be compared unfavourably with Meghnad Desai, as Brown has been this past week during Brown’s much needed diversionary trip abroad in the USA, is to be extremely seriously condemned....
Meghnad Desai is no source of morality. Nor is he a political scientist of any integrity whatever. And he most certainly is no economist. But he has been transformed into these morally ‘higher’ levels and locations by the ‘media’ in the course of a few seconds when he was utilised by particular elements who needed a ‘Labour’-linked entity, however discreditable, to pour scorn at Brown’s integrity, ability, competence and vision.... [not to even b begin to dissect Brown's decade long claim to 'prudence']....
And they were spot on...
And the blame lies with Brown himself...
For Brown has made his own career by aligning himself with the mainstream brigades of [what is the generic term I am in fact meaning to use here?] in what used to be the Labour Party and also the ‘Labour movement’...
Those [what is the generic term I am in fact meaning to use here?] were responsible for the prominence that has been accorded to the phenomenally ignorant likes of Epoch Powell...
Incredibly, Brown is not in the minority as a [what is the term I am in fact meaning to use here?] in the Labour Movement [that includes the MorninG Scar]
[To be continued]
Muhammad Haque reminding Gordon Brown of the prudent advice Khoodeelaar! gave to Brown 4 years ago...
And that advice was that Gordon Brown should continue to reject Ken Livingstone's lies in the name of London.
As Brown returns to the UK to face the latest chorus against his Blairing policy, KHOODEELAAR! updates Brown on what the campaign against the crassly conceived Crossrail hole cam [='the Crossrail Bill' in the UK House of Lords as at 19 April 2008] has been saying about the very core of Brown's problems - the UK economy... This update comes from the heart of inner cities Britain.,..
And the Khoodeelaar! constitutional law and economic updates are stuffed full of Brown's 'British vahloos'...
So Brown had better pay full and active attention to what is coming his way and from the Khoodeelaar! movement
[To be continued]
As Brown returns to the UK to face the latest chorus against his Blairing policy, KHOODEELAAR! updates Brown on what the campaign against the crassly conceived Crossrail hole cam [='the Crossrail Bill' in the UK House of Lords as at 19 April 2008] has been saying about the very core of Brown's problems - the UK economy... This update comes from the heart of inner cities Britain.,..
And the Khoodeelaar! constitutional law and economic updates are stuffed full of Brown's 'British vahloos'...
So Brown had better pay full and active attention to what is coming his way and from the Khoodeelaar! movement
[To be continued]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the 'Crossrail Bill' [a Bill in UK Parliament]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SGqe5VQwLHI/AAAAAAAABfc/MEjjMWby2dc/S226/Khoodeelaar!+try+this+logo.gif)
![London [Rupert Murdoched] Times, Wed. 7 May 2008](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SCIVsQ1wX-I/AAAAAAAAAs8/u1j4VZpbH0Y/S226/1676149.jpg)
