0615 GMT 0715 UKTime London Sunday 13 July 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole plot agenda …..” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO!
That the Blairing cliques on the London local councils controlled in the name of the former Labour Party by operatives impersonating ‘local councils’ are doing damage to the very local communities in whose name they abuse their positions.What does that abuse mean? For the communities, for individuals, for families in the boroughs affected? And a great deal of disservice, it means bad service. Or no service. How do they do so? How do these get away with misleading the ‘local’ communities?
One of the persistent ways that they do it is by ‘taking advantage’ of the absence of active councillors on the same councils.
As KHOODEELAAR! has reported for the past 55 months since our campaign against Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London began [on 31 January 2004], the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council has been IN A STATE OF POLITICAL AND DEMOCRATIC MORASS in terms of an ‘elected collection of councillors speaking out for and representing the local community’. That morass is getting even worse by the week…
Things are so bad that there is now no ‘official opposition’ on Tower Hamlets Council. Why? Is it because the existing ‘elected councillors’ who belong to allegedly [indeed as alleged!!!] opposition parties all set to ‘defect’ to the controlling ‘grouping’? Not as such. NOT Yet. But there is no opposition. No political opposition… Was that foreseen before the last ‘election’ held in May 2006? KHOODEELAAR! had foreseen that. But the ‘politically active opposition parties who were fielding candidates allegedly against the controlling grouping’ did not want to see the truth. They were also culturally hostile to the idea of a real campaign. They preferred to pretend to be radical, opposition and so on while in fact CRAVING to be in ‘position’…. And the result is that there is no NO POSITION… Politically speaking, democratically speaking, even aesthetically, linguistically, conceptually speaking, there is no POSITION on anything from any alleged opposition… on the Tower Hopeless Council…..Which is why the KHOODEELAAR! campaign is now considering one strategy, that of supporting named candidates at the scheduled council election due next in 2010 …[To be continued]
Saturday, July 12, 2008
NETWORK RAIL has been caught acting as CHEAT WORK rail! As CHEAT WORK Rail is close to 'Crossrail' pluggers, we say: SCRAP CRASSRAIL!
By©Muhammad Haque
0530 GMT
London Sunday 13 July 2008
NETWORK RAIL is involved with ‘Crossrail'. How has it been behaving? Has it been found to have been as callous and unreliable? INDEED.
As the evidence represented in one scandal that has been found in Islington:
NETWORK is CHEATWORK rail. As NETWORK RAIL AND Islington council ‘planning’ staff have been caught [see the full text of the report from an Islington based publication, we reproduced below] CHEATING the community in Islington, we ask again: how much more evidence of corruption should be found before the failing, wasteful outfits are either disposed of or their ‘contracts’ seriously reviewed and then rescinded and done away with? How much more evidence of Council ‘planners’ behaving against transparency and community rights and good finance before they are given the overdue SACK that they deserve? How much more losses must be allowed to be caused to the local environment, the local economy before CHEATWORK RAIL are given the marching orders and stopped from looting the public while the needs of the community are neglected?
[To be continued]
Islington Tribune - by PETER GRUNER
Published: 11 July 2008
Footbridge study was ‘duplicitous’
A CONTROVERSIAL £60,000 feasibility study into a footbridge that could unite communities on either side of King’s Cross station was already “weighted against the scheme” before it was launched, according to claims this week.
Network Rail ruled out the £5million footbridge last month – promised originally in plans for the railway land redevelopment – on the grounds of costs and security complications.
But campaigners argued this week that the original brief for the study was “unneces sarily complicated”.
Islington Labour councillor Paul Convery, chairman of the west area planning committee, accused Network Rail and Camden planners, who provided the brief for the feasibility study, of being “duplicitous”.
He added: “The planners didn’t look at a simple bridge which would have stretched across the station from one side to another and which is what the residents wanted.
“Instead they looked at a complicated version with access to several platforms. Obviously that would have created a security nightmare and be costly. So the whole scheme was dropped.”
* The scheme will be discussed at a meeting by the King’s Cross Rail Group on Thursday at the Blessed Sacrament Church in Copenhagen Street, Barnsbury, at 7pm.
Comment on this article.
0530 GMT
London Sunday 13 July 2008
NETWORK RAIL is involved with ‘Crossrail'. How has it been behaving? Has it been found to have been as callous and unreliable? INDEED.
As the evidence represented in one scandal that has been found in Islington:
NETWORK is CHEATWORK rail. As NETWORK RAIL AND Islington council ‘planning’ staff have been caught [see the full text of the report from an Islington based publication, we reproduced below] CHEATING the community in Islington, we ask again: how much more evidence of corruption should be found before the failing, wasteful outfits are either disposed of or their ‘contracts’ seriously reviewed and then rescinded and done away with? How much more evidence of Council ‘planners’ behaving against transparency and community rights and good finance before they are given the overdue SACK that they deserve? How much more losses must be allowed to be caused to the local environment, the local economy before CHEATWORK RAIL are given the marching orders and stopped from looting the public while the needs of the community are neglected?
[To be continued]
Islington Tribune - by PETER GRUNER
Published: 11 July 2008
Footbridge study was ‘duplicitous’
A CONTROVERSIAL £60,000 feasibility study into a footbridge that could unite communities on either side of King’s Cross station was already “weighted against the scheme” before it was launched, according to claims this week.
Network Rail ruled out the £5million footbridge last month – promised originally in plans for the railway land redevelopment – on the grounds of costs and security complications.
But campaigners argued this week that the original brief for the study was “unneces sarily complicated”.
Islington Labour councillor Paul Convery, chairman of the west area planning committee, accused Network Rail and Camden planners, who provided the brief for the feasibility study, of being “duplicitous”.
He added: “The planners didn’t look at a simple bridge which would have stretched across the station from one side to another and which is what the residents wanted.
“Instead they looked at a complicated version with access to several platforms. Obviously that would have created a security nightmare and be costly. So the whole scheme was dropped.”
* The scheme will be discussed at a meeting by the King’s Cross Rail Group on Thursday at the Blessed Sacrament Church in Copenhagen Street, Barnsbury, at 7pm.
Comment on this article.
NETWORK RAIL has been caught acting as CHEAT WORK rail! As CHEAT WORK Rail is close to 'Crossrail' pluggers, we say: SCRAP CRASSRAIL!
Depriving inner cities, or worse, ADDING to poverty in the inner cities, like Crossrail hole/s, is not the way forward, Gordon!
By©Muhammad Haque
2235 Hrs GMT
London Saturday
12 July 2008
Gordon Brown is defying all reasonable, lawful and constitutional advice, evidence e and warnings to him about his ill-advised ‘commitment to the Crossrail hole plot.
Why is he doing so?
There is no answer in what he has said so far on Crossrail.
As we have been publishing daily, there CAN BE NO EVIDENCE in support of Brown’s commitment to the London Crossrail.
It is a poverty-creating project.
It is at variance with his stated opposition to poverty.
Why then is Brown sticking by Crossrail?
We have to look at other possible causes.
Including his state of mind. We shall go to a psychological site in the next parts.
For this part,w e refer to Zimbabwe and the Sino-Russian veto on sanctions move that the USA and Brown had tabled.
Will Gordon Brown be ‘vindicated’ over the Russian veto ‘freeze’ [as Brown claimed in the House of Commons speech in effect] over the USA-UK move at the Security Council to vote for sanctions against Robert Mugabe-fronted regime? This is a question that has arisen because the Russians used their veto and opposed the USA-UK move to have the sanctions imposed against Zimbabwe.
What the final ‘evidence’ published may show about Gordon Brown’s ‘deal ‘ with Moscow’s Dmitry Medvedev before the security council vote, is not known. Yet. But nobody is waiting for the final evidence to be published before making comments on Gordon Brown’s judgement!.
Despite his ‘diplomatic’ words, alleging unanimity across ‘British politics’ [Hague’s phrase!!!] on the issue of Zimbabwe, the Tory spokesperson on world affairs William Hague has already [during today Saturday 12 July 2008] fuelled speculation into the truth of what actually happened at the G8 summit where Brown allegedly bagged the Russians' support against Mugabe.
Whatever the actual facts, the comments mill is at full spin. So much so that the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been aware of it. Thus asking: how is it that Gordon Brown can be subjected to such intense analysis on everything else but not on CROSSRAIL?
[To be continued]
What exactly is the secret of this ‘eternal unanimity’ [my words] across ‘British politics’ [my, Muhammad HAQUE;s, as different from William Hague’s, phrase!]
"
Islington Tribune - by PETER GRUNER
Published: 11 July 2008
Footbridge study was ‘duplicitous’
A CONTROVERSIAL £60,000 feasibility study into a footbridge that could unite communities on either side of King’s Cross station was already “weighted against the scheme” before it was launched, according to claims this week.
Network Rail ruled out the £5million footbridge last month – promised originally in plans for the railway land redevelopment – on the grounds of costs and security complications.
But campaigners argued this week that the original brief for the study was “unneces sarily complicated”.
Islington Labour councillor Paul Convery, chairman of the west area planning committee, accused Network Rail and Camden planners, who provided the brief for the feasibility study, of being “duplicitous”.
He added: “The planners didn’t look at a simple bridge which would have stretched across the station from one side to another and which is what the residents wanted.
“Instead they looked at a complicated version with access to several platforms. Obviously that would have created a security nightmare and be costly. So the whole scheme was dropped.”
* The scheme will be discussed at a meeting by the King’s Cross Rail Group on Thursday at the Blessed Sacrament Church in Copenhagen Street, Barnsbury, at 7pm.
Comment on this article.
"
By©Muhammad Haque
2235 Hrs GMT
London Saturday
12 July 2008
Gordon Brown is defying all reasonable, lawful and constitutional advice, evidence e and warnings to him about his ill-advised ‘commitment to the Crossrail hole plot.
Why is he doing so?
There is no answer in what he has said so far on Crossrail.
As we have been publishing daily, there CAN BE NO EVIDENCE in support of Brown’s commitment to the London Crossrail.
It is a poverty-creating project.
It is at variance with his stated opposition to poverty.
Why then is Brown sticking by Crossrail?
We have to look at other possible causes.
Including his state of mind. We shall go to a psychological site in the next parts.
For this part,w e refer to Zimbabwe and the Sino-Russian veto on sanctions move that the USA and Brown had tabled.
Will Gordon Brown be ‘vindicated’ over the Russian veto ‘freeze’ [as Brown claimed in the House of Commons speech in effect] over the USA-UK move at the Security Council to vote for sanctions against Robert Mugabe-fronted regime? This is a question that has arisen because the Russians used their veto and opposed the USA-UK move to have the sanctions imposed against Zimbabwe.
What the final ‘evidence’ published may show about Gordon Brown’s ‘deal ‘ with Moscow’s Dmitry Medvedev before the security council vote, is not known. Yet. But nobody is waiting for the final evidence to be published before making comments on Gordon Brown’s judgement!.
Despite his ‘diplomatic’ words, alleging unanimity across ‘British politics’ [Hague’s phrase!!!] on the issue of Zimbabwe, the Tory spokesperson on world affairs William Hague has already [during today Saturday 12 July 2008] fuelled speculation into the truth of what actually happened at the G8 summit where Brown allegedly bagged the Russians' support against Mugabe.
Whatever the actual facts, the comments mill is at full spin. So much so that the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been aware of it. Thus asking: how is it that Gordon Brown can be subjected to such intense analysis on everything else but not on CROSSRAIL?
[To be continued]
What exactly is the secret of this ‘eternal unanimity’ [my words] across ‘British politics’ [my, Muhammad HAQUE;s, as different from William Hague’s, phrase!]
"
Islington Tribune - by PETER GRUNER
Published: 11 July 2008
Footbridge study was ‘duplicitous’
A CONTROVERSIAL £60,000 feasibility study into a footbridge that could unite communities on either side of King’s Cross station was already “weighted against the scheme” before it was launched, according to claims this week.
Network Rail ruled out the £5million footbridge last month – promised originally in plans for the railway land redevelopment – on the grounds of costs and security complications.
But campaigners argued this week that the original brief for the study was “unneces sarily complicated”.
Islington Labour councillor Paul Convery, chairman of the west area planning committee, accused Network Rail and Camden planners, who provided the brief for the feasibility study, of being “duplicitous”.
He added: “The planners didn’t look at a simple bridge which would have stretched across the station from one side to another and which is what the residents wanted.
“Instead they looked at a complicated version with access to several platforms. Obviously that would have created a security nightmare and be costly. So the whole scheme was dropped.”
* The scheme will be discussed at a meeting by the King’s Cross Rail Group on Thursday at the Blessed Sacrament Church in Copenhagen Street, Barnsbury, at 7pm.
Comment on this article.
"
Is Gordon Brown miraculously immune from all charges, so long as he sticks by his backing for the CRASS Crossrail hole plot, London?
Depriving inner cities, or worse, ADDING to poverty in the inner cities, like Crossrail hole/s, is not the way forward, Gordon!
By©Muhammad Haque
2235 Hrs GMT
London Saturday
12 July 2008
Gordon Brown is defying all reasonable, lawful and constitutional advice, evidence e and warnings to him about his ill-advised ‘commitment to the Crossrail hole plot.
Why is he doing so?
There is no answer in what he has said so far on Crossrail.
As we have been publishing daily, there CAN BE NO EVIDENCE in support of Brown’s commitment to the London Crossrail.
It is a poverty-creating project.
It is at variance with his stated opposition to poverty.
Why then is Brown sticking by Crossrail?
We have to look at other possible causes.
Including his state of mind. We shall go to a psychological site in the next parts.
For this part,w e refer to Zimbabwe and the Sino-Russian veto on sanctions move that the USA and Brown had tabled.
Will Gordon Brown be ‘vindicated’ over the Russian veto ‘freeze’ [as Brown claimed in the House of Commons speech in effect] over the USA-UK move at the Security Council to vote for sanctions against Robert Mugabe-fronted regime? This is a question that has arisen because the Russians used their veto and opposed the USA-UK move to have the sanctions imposed against Zimbabwe.
What the final ‘evidence’ published may show about Gordon Brown’s ‘deal ‘ with Moscow’s Dmitry Medvedev before the security council vote, is not known. Yet. But nobody is waiting for the final evidence to be published before making comments on Gordon Brown’s judgement!.
Despite his ‘diplomatic’ words, alleging unanimity across ‘British politics’ [Hague’s phrase!!!] on the issue of Zimbabwe, the Tory spokesperson on world affairs William Hague has already [during today Saturday 12 July 2008] fuelled speculation into the truth of what actually happened at the G8 summit where Brown allegedly bagged the Russians' support against Mugabe.
Whatever the actual facts, the comments mill is at full spin. So much so that the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been aware of it. Thus asking: how is it that Gordon Brown can be subjected to such intense analysis on everything else but not on CROSSRAIL?
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
2235 Hrs GMT
London Saturday
12 July 2008
Gordon Brown is defying all reasonable, lawful and constitutional advice, evidence e and warnings to him about his ill-advised ‘commitment to the Crossrail hole plot.
Why is he doing so?
There is no answer in what he has said so far on Crossrail.
As we have been publishing daily, there CAN BE NO EVIDENCE in support of Brown’s commitment to the London Crossrail.
It is a poverty-creating project.
It is at variance with his stated opposition to poverty.
Why then is Brown sticking by Crossrail?
We have to look at other possible causes.
Including his state of mind. We shall go to a psychological site in the next parts.
For this part,w e refer to Zimbabwe and the Sino-Russian veto on sanctions move that the USA and Brown had tabled.
Will Gordon Brown be ‘vindicated’ over the Russian veto ‘freeze’ [as Brown claimed in the House of Commons speech in effect] over the USA-UK move at the Security Council to vote for sanctions against Robert Mugabe-fronted regime? This is a question that has arisen because the Russians used their veto and opposed the USA-UK move to have the sanctions imposed against Zimbabwe.
What the final ‘evidence’ published may show about Gordon Brown’s ‘deal ‘ with Moscow’s Dmitry Medvedev before the security council vote, is not known. Yet. But nobody is waiting for the final evidence to be published before making comments on Gordon Brown’s judgement!.
Despite his ‘diplomatic’ words, alleging unanimity across ‘British politics’ [Hague’s phrase!!!] on the issue of Zimbabwe, the Tory spokesperson on world affairs William Hague has already [during today Saturday 12 July 2008] fuelled speculation into the truth of what actually happened at the G8 summit where Brown allegedly bagged the Russians' support against Mugabe.
Whatever the actual facts, the comments mill is at full spin. So much so that the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been aware of it. Thus asking: how is it that Gordon Brown can be subjected to such intense analysis on everything else but not on CROSSRAIL?
[To be continued]
As Gordon Brown's judgement AGAIN comes under attack, how can it be that he is infallible on Crossrail hole plot alone?
As Gordon Brown's judgement AGAIN comes under attack, how can it be that he is infallible on Crossrail hole plot alone?
More, here, shortly
More, here, shortly
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
Saturday, 12 July 2008
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
2000 GMT 2100 UK Time London Saturday 12 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! is the reasonable, ordinary, common sense, lawful, legal, constitutional, ethical, moral environmental CAMPAIGN against waste of public resource by the UK Government that is being operated by elements inside the Govt bureaucracies who are in fact representative of Big Business the Big businesses have bought the soul and the minds and the attention of the decision -makers within the Govt...
KHOODEELAAR! is the antidote to all of that and above all, KHOODEELAAR! is the unique audit of the holders of 'elected office' in the name of inner city East End of London...
What KHOODEELAAR! says today on the facts, on the evidence and on the empirical studies and the factual updates of the situation concerning the ongoing imposition of poverty-creating activities via the local Tower Hamlets Council and via the other ‘power’-linked ‘holders’ of elected posts and the recipients of profitable [personally to them and at the expense of the community across the East End of London ] unelected but sub-legitimate and QUANGO-ed linked posts and connections, will be vindicated tomorrow.
The Khoodeelaar! movement is part of the same empirical foundation whence Tony McNulty, the 'minister' currently being used to front the assault on civil liberties and fundamental rights in Britain under the pretext of protecting the UK from 'greater threats to society' [=’Counter-Terrorism Bill 2008’] , had been questioned YEARS earlier about the Blairing SQUANDERING of the peoples’ mandate. The mandate as it had been expressed in May 1997....
. Khoodeelaar! has pointed out in the course of the 55 months of the campaign against Crossrail hole plot and agenda so far, the various personal and equally unpublicised other links that McNulty has with the controlling clique on and in Tower Hamlets Council.... It is via those links that McNulty would have been acquainted with the realties on the grounds of poverty and the role in creating poverty that the Council and its allied bureaucracies played...McNulty was also present at an otherwise innocent location [the Altab Ali Park] almost 3 years ago when he posed for publicity photographs near the site of one of the underground explosions that cost the innocent peoples’ lives... So McNulty has been in ‘touch’ with elements in Tower Hamlets IN THE NAME of Government as well....
Some of those who appeared with him in the series of promotional photos and related ‘facilities’ events, would be included among McNulty’s links... It was not just his own reported wife, Christine Gilbert who was still employed in the Tower Hamlets Council [as ‘chief executive’ - she was given that job despite not being the best candidate, because some key controlling clique members who appointed her, found her to be willing to overlook the conduct of the key controlling cliqusters] that McNulty would have ‘consulted’ about the 'situation'... Khoodeelaar! has evidence showing that McNulty knows quite a few individuals that are close to or are at the centre of the clique in control of Tower Hamlets CROSSRAIL hole plot-INVITING Council.... And he would therefore know that the area is not going to welcome another deprivation programme which is what the Crossrail, hole plot is... So what role has McNulty played in the actual drafting of what is now known as the hole-imposing ‘Crossrail Bill’? He was in the Crossrail hole plot-peddling DfT [=UK ‘Department for Transport’, then fronted by the current UK Finance Minister Alistair Darling] in 2004-2005... We shall examine further McNulty’s crucial role in the planned further creation of poverty in the East End of London via the implementation - and the imposition - of the Crossrail hole plot and programme. We shall look at McNulty’s linked role in the erosion of fundamental civil liberties that McNulty is now being used to front in the fanatical way that he has been. We shall show in context the serious and far reaching adverse and disproportionate effect on the community in the East End of London that BOTH pieces of McNulty-linked and over-hyped Blairing legislation will have:...... [To be continued]
Posted by AADHIKARonline London UK April 2007 at 13:08 0 com
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
2000 GMT 2100 UK Time London Saturday 12 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! is the reasonable, ordinary, common sense, lawful, legal, constitutional, ethical, moral environmental CAMPAIGN against waste of public resource by the UK Government that is being operated by elements inside the Govt bureaucracies who are in fact representative of Big Business the Big businesses have bought the soul and the minds and the attention of the decision -makers within the Govt...
KHOODEELAAR! is the antidote to all of that and above all, KHOODEELAAR! is the unique audit of the holders of 'elected office' in the name of inner city East End of London...
What KHOODEELAAR! says today on the facts, on the evidence and on the empirical studies and the factual updates of the situation concerning the ongoing imposition of poverty-creating activities via the local Tower Hamlets Council and via the other ‘power’-linked ‘holders’ of elected posts and the recipients of profitable [personally to them and at the expense of the community across the East End of London ] unelected but sub-legitimate and QUANGO-ed linked posts and connections, will be vindicated tomorrow.
The Khoodeelaar! movement is part of the same empirical foundation whence Tony McNulty, the 'minister' currently being used to front the assault on civil liberties and fundamental rights in Britain under the pretext of protecting the UK from 'greater threats to society' [=’Counter-Terrorism Bill 2008’] , had been questioned YEARS earlier about the Blairing SQUANDERING of the peoples’ mandate. The mandate as it had been expressed in May 1997....
. Khoodeelaar! has pointed out in the course of the 55 months of the campaign against Crossrail hole plot and agenda so far, the various personal and equally unpublicised other links that McNulty has with the controlling clique on and in Tower Hamlets Council.... It is via those links that McNulty would have been acquainted with the realties on the grounds of poverty and the role in creating poverty that the Council and its allied bureaucracies played...McNulty was also present at an otherwise innocent location [the Altab Ali Park] almost 3 years ago when he posed for publicity photographs near the site of one of the underground explosions that cost the innocent peoples’ lives... So McNulty has been in ‘touch’ with elements in Tower Hamlets IN THE NAME of Government as well....
Some of those who appeared with him in the series of promotional photos and related ‘facilities’ events, would be included among McNulty’s links... It was not just his own reported wife, Christine Gilbert who was still employed in the Tower Hamlets Council [as ‘chief executive’ - she was given that job despite not being the best candidate, because some key controlling clique members who appointed her, found her to be willing to overlook the conduct of the key controlling cliqusters] that McNulty would have ‘consulted’ about the 'situation'... Khoodeelaar! has evidence showing that McNulty knows quite a few individuals that are close to or are at the centre of the clique in control of Tower Hamlets CROSSRAIL hole plot-INVITING Council.... And he would therefore know that the area is not going to welcome another deprivation programme which is what the Crossrail, hole plot is... So what role has McNulty played in the actual drafting of what is now known as the hole-imposing ‘Crossrail Bill’? He was in the Crossrail hole plot-peddling DfT [=UK ‘Department for Transport’, then fronted by the current UK Finance Minister Alistair Darling] in 2004-2005... We shall examine further McNulty’s crucial role in the planned further creation of poverty in the East End of London via the implementation - and the imposition - of the Crossrail hole plot and programme. We shall look at McNulty’s linked role in the erosion of fundamental civil liberties that McNulty is now being used to front in the fanatical way that he has been. We shall show in context the serious and far reaching adverse and disproportionate effect on the community in the East End of London that BOTH pieces of McNulty-linked and over-hyped Blairing legislation will have:...... [To be continued]
Posted by AADHIKARonline London UK April 2007 at 13:08 0 com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the 'Crossrail Bill' [a Bill in UK Parliament]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SGqe5VQwLHI/AAAAAAAABfc/MEjjMWby2dc/S226/Khoodeelaar!+try+this+logo.gif)
![London [Rupert Murdoched] Times, Wed. 7 May 2008](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitiFRN6uO_MOdYMby0s7ow2zcBaewOKfl3k4QdCPcahu1IKXx6sl7Gs4aO9VrAhN8gQJvYb1a2JnODsTUsMks_LtoZVuqc64whMkMitNKVz1bijPST853uNwRNG8x2PVFl1kqRez8M3b-j/s226/1676149.jpg)
