Monday, July 14, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! electoral challenges in Tower Hamlets seats - next update due here at 0001 GMT Tuesday 15 July 2008
KHOODEELAAR! electoral challenges in Tower Hamlets seats - next update due here at 0001 GMT Tuesday 15 July 2008
Crossrail hole plot agenda-promoting decision by Brown was wrong. As is his latest utterance
Crossrail hole plot agenda-promoting decision by Brown was wrong. As is his latest utterance... Before examining Brown’s utterances on the widespread incidents of mainly young people killing other young people across Britain and London, let us take another updated look at how wrong Gordon Brown can be... And then I shall detail,. why Brown should stop taking part in spin and lies.... And why he should start looking at the evidence of those in publicly paid for positions....posts and platforms
By©Muhammad Haque
1810 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 July 2008
When KHOODEELAAR! advised Gordon Brown in early 2004 that he should have nothing whatever to do with the then [yet to be a hybrid Bill-ed] Crassrail scam, we had done so on accurate information we had gathered about the UK Finance ministry's attitude towards the scheme. We had found out that Brown was not supportive of Crossrail because it was not economically justified.
We ourselves have said - and demonstrated the evidence supporting what we have said - all along that the uneconomic nature of the CRASSrail scam is one of its major minus points.
So when we learnt that Brown too was thinking the same way as we had been doing, we treated Brown with a different approach. we did not call him a crass chancellor. Far less an imprudent one. For the evidence available to us in 2004 was that Brown was doing what we would have wanted him to do: say No to CRASSrail.
That line from the UK’s Ministry of Finance [the ‘Treasury’] in effect continued upto even this time last year.
A year ago, in July 2007, the second ‘most influential treasury man’ [in effect the UK’s then deputy Finance minister] as they promoted Ed Balls, was giving out hints and noises that Crossrail would have to be supported otherwise than by public funding,...
That showed that Brown was still not backing Crossrail.
For Ed Balls was nothing if not an echo of Gordon Brown at the Treasury then.
On that evidence, we were logically and evidentially totally opposed to Brown’s NEXT act. That of making utterances just like those ignorant, dishonest and corrupt touts for Big Business had sounded for the years between say February 2004 and June 2007.
Brown was coming across as a fanatical believer in a cult of CROSSRAIL!
He was saying things that the corrupt lobby and City of London elements alone had been saying for the previous 18 months or so.
There was no prudence. No evidence for the new imprudence that Brown was uttering....
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1810 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 July 2008
When KHOODEELAAR! advised Gordon Brown in early 2004 that he should have nothing whatever to do with the then [yet to be a hybrid Bill-ed] Crassrail scam, we had done so on accurate information we had gathered about the UK Finance ministry's attitude towards the scheme. We had found out that Brown was not supportive of Crossrail because it was not economically justified.
We ourselves have said - and demonstrated the evidence supporting what we have said - all along that the uneconomic nature of the CRASSrail scam is one of its major minus points.
So when we learnt that Brown too was thinking the same way as we had been doing, we treated Brown with a different approach. we did not call him a crass chancellor. Far less an imprudent one. For the evidence available to us in 2004 was that Brown was doing what we would have wanted him to do: say No to CRASSrail.
That line from the UK’s Ministry of Finance [the ‘Treasury’] in effect continued upto even this time last year.
A year ago, in July 2007, the second ‘most influential treasury man’ [in effect the UK’s then deputy Finance minister] as they promoted Ed Balls, was giving out hints and noises that Crossrail would have to be supported otherwise than by public funding,...
That showed that Brown was still not backing Crossrail.
For Ed Balls was nothing if not an echo of Gordon Brown at the Treasury then.
On that evidence, we were logically and evidentially totally opposed to Brown’s NEXT act. That of making utterances just like those ignorant, dishonest and corrupt touts for Big Business had sounded for the years between say February 2004 and June 2007.
Brown was coming across as a fanatical believer in a cult of CROSSRAIL!
He was saying things that the corrupt lobby and City of London elements alone had been saying for the previous 18 months or so.
There was no prudence. No evidence for the new imprudence that Brown was uttering....
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! accurately and correctly told Brown to say NO to Crossrail hole plot... We tell him now to say NO to all spin, hype and lies...
Crossrail hole plot agenda-promoting decision by Brown was wrong. As is his latest utterance... Before examining Brown’s utterances on the widespread incidents of mainly young people killing other young people across Britain and London, let us take another updated look at how wrong Gordon Brown can be... And then I shall detail,. why Brown should stop taking part in spin and lies.... And why he should start looking at the evidence of those in publicly paid for positions....posts and platforms
By©Muhammad Haque
1810 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 July 2008
When KHOODEELAAR! advised Gordon Brown in early 2004 that he should have nothing whatever to do with the then [yet to be a hybrid Bill-ed] Crassrail scam, we had done so on accurate information we had gathered about the UK Finance ministry's attitude towards the scheme. We had found out that Brown was not supportive of Crossrail because it was not economically justified.
We ourselves have said - and demonstrated the evidence supporting what we have said - all along that the uneconomic nature of the CRASSrail scam is one of its major minus points.
So when we learnt that Brown too was thinking the same way as we had been doing, we treated Brown with a different approach. we did not call him a crass chancellor. Far less an imprudent one. For the evidence available to us in 2004 was that Brown was doing what we would have wanted him to do: say No to CRASSrail.
That line from the UK’s Ministry of Finance [the ‘Treasury’] in effect continued upto even this time last year.
A year ago, in July 2007, the second ‘most influential treasury man’ [in effect the UK’s then deputy Finance minister] as they promoted Ed Balls, was giving out hints and noises that Crossrail would have to be supported otherwise than by public funding,...
That showed that Brown was still not backing Crossrail.
For Ed Balls was nothing if not an echo of Gordon Brown at the Treasury then.
On that evidence, we were logically and evidentially totally opposed to Brown’s NEXT act. That of making utterances just like those ignorant, dishonest and corrupt touts for Big Business had sounded for the years between say February 2004 and June 2007.
Brown was coming across as a fanatical believer in a cult of CROSSRAIL!
He was saying things that the corrupt lobby and City of London elements alone had been saying for the previous 18 months or so.
There was no prudence. No evidence for the new imprudence that Brown was uttering....
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1810 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 July 2008
When KHOODEELAAR! advised Gordon Brown in early 2004 that he should have nothing whatever to do with the then [yet to be a hybrid Bill-ed] Crassrail scam, we had done so on accurate information we had gathered about the UK Finance ministry's attitude towards the scheme. We had found out that Brown was not supportive of Crossrail because it was not economically justified.
We ourselves have said - and demonstrated the evidence supporting what we have said - all along that the uneconomic nature of the CRASSrail scam is one of its major minus points.
So when we learnt that Brown too was thinking the same way as we had been doing, we treated Brown with a different approach. we did not call him a crass chancellor. Far less an imprudent one. For the evidence available to us in 2004 was that Brown was doing what we would have wanted him to do: say No to CRASSrail.
That line from the UK’s Ministry of Finance [the ‘Treasury’] in effect continued upto even this time last year.
A year ago, in July 2007, the second ‘most influential treasury man’ [in effect the UK’s then deputy Finance minister] as they promoted Ed Balls, was giving out hints and noises that Crossrail would have to be supported otherwise than by public funding,...
That showed that Brown was still not backing Crossrail.
For Ed Balls was nothing if not an echo of Gordon Brown at the Treasury then.
On that evidence, we were logically and evidentially totally opposed to Brown’s NEXT act. That of making utterances just like those ignorant, dishonest and corrupt touts for Big Business had sounded for the years between say February 2004 and June 2007.
Brown was coming across as a fanatical believer in a cult of CROSSRAIL!
He was saying things that the corrupt lobby and City of London elements alone had been saying for the previous 18 months or so.
There was no prudence. No evidence for the new imprudence that Brown was uttering....
[To be continued]
Tribunal finds Tower Hamlets Council guilty of bias against 'older' people..IN EFFECT just as crass as in inviting CROSSRAIL hole attacks...
1630 Hrs GMT London Monday 14 July 2008:KHOODEELAAR! NO to Crassly controlled Crossrail hole-plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council clique: The latest publication by the journal PERSONNEL TODAY points out that Tower Hamlets Council has already gone into denial about the Employment tribunal's finding in the JOHN WOOSTER case... That denial is contained in a report today [Monday 14 July 2008] we have here linked to [see the column next to this] .. KHOODEELAAR! analysis covers aspects that are not confined to just age discrimination We look at the outfit, EastEnd Homes. In context... Eastend Homes is one of the outfits that the corrupt clique on Tower hamlets Council has allowed to be set up. This has been in order to carry out in effect the Margaret Thatcher agenda of dismantling society. Those safeguards and securities and rights that are associated with social or public ownership of services. By attacking those services, those safeties, those rights and legal protection, society-on-the-ground has been weakened in Tower Hamlets. The result, the consequences have been seen in the steady and the mounting deterioration in the quality of life in the Borough... We look at those wider implications... Not confined to the particular case of John Wooster [To be continued]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the 'Crossrail Bill' [a Bill in UK Parliament]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SGqe5VQwLHI/AAAAAAAABfc/MEjjMWby2dc/S226/Khoodeelaar!+try+this+logo.gif)
![London [Rupert Murdoched] Times, Wed. 7 May 2008](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitiFRN6uO_MOdYMby0s7ow2zcBaewOKfl3k4QdCPcahu1IKXx6sl7Gs4aO9VrAhN8gQJvYb1a2JnODsTUsMks_LtoZVuqc64whMkMitNKVz1bijPST853uNwRNG8x2PVFl1kqRez8M3b-j/s226/1676149.jpg)
