KHOODEELAAR! LAW UNIT to Boris Johnson by E-MAIL at 1230 Hrs UK 22 July 2008
These [in two parts] [This is part 2 of 2] are the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole questions that Boris Johnson must answer today about Crossrail
What is the evidence for saying that Crossrail is crucial to the London economy?
What is the evidence for saying that Crossrail will bring benefits to the East End of Lon don?
What does ‘benefits’ in this context refer to in ordinary language? Does it relate to human, economic social, societal productive capacities that are not obtainable or available in any other way in London’s East End or via or from or through the existing transport facilities, links and infrastructure except by there being a rail line called [or like the one devised as] Crossrail?
If so what is that evidence?
Where is that evidence?
And if that evidence exists, how long has that existed?
And who created the analytical identify of that evidence?
Who did any research, investigation and where and over what time and in what field and with what materials and subjects and under what criteria and parameters and commission and authority?
What is any evidence that says that Crossrail is vital for London’s world class status? What exactly foes that phrase refer to and on what basis in terms of the day to day experience in London today and in the recent past?
What legal, evidential, constitutional and democratic reason is there, if any, for there being no answer to the hundreds of KHOODEELAAR! questions concerning and covering all the main aspects of the whole CROSSRAIL scam and as put in the past years to the office you now hold?
Ends part 2 of the updated Question to Boris Johnson
1200 GMT
1300 UKTime
London
Tuesday 22 July 2008
2nd part follows in a few minutes
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! demands Boris Johnson must fully face up to on Crossrail hole plot waste
KHOODEELAAR! LAW UNIT to Boris Johnson by E-MAIL at 1230 Hrs UK 22 July 2008
These [in two parts] are the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole questions that Boris Johnson must answer today about Crossrail
1. What admissible and accessible and publicly available as at today Tuesday 22 July 2008 evidence is there that shows that the transport needs of London are primarily about there being a Crossrail?
2. What reasonable ground is there for Gordon Brown's ignoring the advice of Rod Eddington [see Channel 4 news, October 2007] and making that transparently election-linked stunt announcement of the commitment of £Billions of public money to Crossrail?
3. What correlative evidence is there for the promotion of the Crossrail scam as ‘bringing benefits’ to ANY ordinary part of London communities as OPPOSED to Crossrail being used as a propaganda, and a marketing hype and reference tool to enhance the unsubstantiated i image of what the promoters consider to be Britain?
4. What is the evidence in any reasonable sense that shows that the lies which Ken Livingstone admitted as having perpetrated to get the 2012 Olympic Games hosting to London on the BBC TV Question Time programme [in which Boris Johnson himself took part in the last week of April 2008] were acceptable?
5. What ground is there for any lies to be accepted ?
6. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the low income groups of people in London have the demand, expressed the demand or have agreed to the demand by their economic conduct or the capacity to support the extra costs of funding Crossrail?
7. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the ordinary people who use or need to use transport in London have given any preference to the public money and the council tax payers'’ money being wasted in the way that Crossrail entails?
8. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of Lon d’ conducted that shows the full range in accessible way of the existing transport infrastructure in London as compared to the full implications and ramifications of the Crossrail hole scam?
Ends part 1 of the updated Question to Boris Johnson
1130 GMT
1230 UKTime
London
Tuesday 22 July 2008
2nd part follows in a few minutes
These [in two parts] are the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole questions that Boris Johnson must answer today about Crossrail
1. What admissible and accessible and publicly available as at today Tuesday 22 July 2008 evidence is there that shows that the transport needs of London are primarily about there being a Crossrail?
2. What reasonable ground is there for Gordon Brown's ignoring the advice of Rod Eddington [see Channel 4 news, October 2007] and making that transparently election-linked stunt announcement of the commitment of £Billions of public money to Crossrail?
3. What correlative evidence is there for the promotion of the Crossrail scam as ‘bringing benefits’ to ANY ordinary part of London communities as OPPOSED to Crossrail being used as a propaganda, and a marketing hype and reference tool to enhance the unsubstantiated i image of what the promoters consider to be Britain?
4. What is the evidence in any reasonable sense that shows that the lies which Ken Livingstone admitted as having perpetrated to get the 2012 Olympic Games hosting to London on the BBC TV Question Time programme [in which Boris Johnson himself took part in the last week of April 2008] were acceptable?
5. What ground is there for any lies to be accepted ?
6. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the low income groups of people in London have the demand, expressed the demand or have agreed to the demand by their economic conduct or the capacity to support the extra costs of funding Crossrail?
7. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the ordinary people who use or need to use transport in London have given any preference to the public money and the council tax payers'’ money being wasted in the way that Crossrail entails?
8. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of Lon d’ conducted that shows the full range in accessible way of the existing transport infrastructure in London as compared to the full implications and ramifications of the Crossrail hole scam?
Ends part 1 of the updated Question to Boris Johnson
1130 GMT
1230 UKTime
London
Tuesday 22 July 2008
2nd part follows in a few minutes
KHOODEELAAR! demands Boris Johnson must fully face up to on Crossrail hole plot waste
KHOODEELAAR! LAW UNIT to Boris Johnson by E-MAIL at 1230 Hrs UK 22 July 2008
These [in two parts] are the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole questions that Boris Johnson must answer today about Crossrail
1. What admissible and accessible and publicly available as at today Tuesday 22 July 2008 evidence is there that shows that the transport needs of London are primarily about there being a Crossrail?
2. What reasonable ground is there for Gordon Brown's ignoring the advice of Rod Eddington [see Channel 4 news, October 2007] and making that transparently election-linked stunt announcement of the commitment of £Billions of public money to Crossrail?
3. What correlative evidence is there for the promotion of the Crossrail scam as ‘bringing benefits’ to ANY ordinary part of London communities as OPPOSED to Crossrail being used as a propaganda, and a marketing hype and reference tool to enhance the unsubstantiated i image of what the promoters consider to be Britain?
4. What is the evidence in any reasonable sense that shows that the lies which Ken Livingstone admitted as having perpetrated to get the 2012 Olympic Games hosting to London on the BBC TV Question Time programme [in which Boris Johnson himself took part in the last week of April 2008] were acceptable?
5. What ground is there for any lies to be accepted ?
6. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the low income groups of people in London have the demand, expressed the demand or have agreed to the demand by their economic conduct or the capacity to support the extra costs of funding Crossrail?
7. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the ordinary people who use or need to use transport in London have given any preference to the public money and the council tax payers'’ money being wasted in the way that Crossrail entails?
8. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of Lon d’ conducted that shows the full range in accessible way of the existing transport infrastructure in London as compared to the full implications and ramifications of the Crossrail hole scam?
Ends part 1 of the updated Question to Boris Johnson
1130 GMT
1230 UKTime
London
Tuesday 22 July 2008
2nd part follows in a few minutes
These [in two parts] are the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole questions that Boris Johnson must answer today about Crossrail
1. What admissible and accessible and publicly available as at today Tuesday 22 July 2008 evidence is there that shows that the transport needs of London are primarily about there being a Crossrail?
2. What reasonable ground is there for Gordon Brown's ignoring the advice of Rod Eddington [see Channel 4 news, October 2007] and making that transparently election-linked stunt announcement of the commitment of £Billions of public money to Crossrail?
3. What correlative evidence is there for the promotion of the Crossrail scam as ‘bringing benefits’ to ANY ordinary part of London communities as OPPOSED to Crossrail being used as a propaganda, and a marketing hype and reference tool to enhance the unsubstantiated i image of what the promoters consider to be Britain?
4. What is the evidence in any reasonable sense that shows that the lies which Ken Livingstone admitted as having perpetrated to get the 2012 Olympic Games hosting to London on the BBC TV Question Time programme [in which Boris Johnson himself took part in the last week of April 2008] were acceptable?
5. What ground is there for any lies to be accepted ?
6. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the low income groups of people in London have the demand, expressed the demand or have agreed to the demand by their economic conduct or the capacity to support the extra costs of funding Crossrail?
7. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the ordinary people who use or need to use transport in London have given any preference to the public money and the council tax payers'’ money being wasted in the way that Crossrail entails?
8. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of Lon d’ conducted that shows the full range in accessible way of the existing transport infrastructure in London as compared to the full implications and ramifications of the Crossrail hole scam?
Ends part 1 of the updated Question to Boris Johnson
1130 GMT
1230 UKTime
London
Tuesday 22 July 2008
2nd part follows in a few minutes
Khoodeelaar! final notice before court proceedings, sent to Boris Johnson: DON"T Endorse Crossrail scam!
Dear Mr Johnson
This is further to our previous memos, questions, notices as served on the holder of the post of mayor of London on the matter of the 'Crossrail hole scam' as contained in and represented by the 'Crossrail Bill' which Harriet Harman has said would be conveyed as having been given the Royal assent today.
We are sending this to confirm that as soon as the existing UK domestic court procedures permit, we shall be filing applications to the High court against ALL those who have been in power to promote the Crossrail Bill and the scam. That includes the holder of the office of mayor in the name of London.
That means yourself.
We are therefore asking you to delay any repeat by ‘the mayor’ in the name of London of any fanatical, enthusiastic [including and implying exaggerated, unsubstantiated...] endorsement OF THE CROSSRAIL BILL [or ‘Crossrail Act’] UNTIL AFTER YOU HAVE READ AND RESPONDED TO OUR LATEST LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW QUESTIONS. Those questions are being prepared now and will be sent to you by 1400 Hrs UK time today.
Should you decide to ignore this and go ahead anyway in making the endorsing comment etc. we shall treat such action as being conclusive confirmation of your position. That position will warrant our treating you as the SECOND defendant in any court action.
We are asking you to DELAY ANY agreement with the DfT or any other party peddling the Crassrail scam until you have fully considered our objections and responded to us in full on our evidence and have fully responded to us within the law and within the constitution. By ‘the constitution’ we mean and also include the UK’s treaty obligations and draw your attention, as a brief pointer in this short updater communication, to the Factortame cases and THEIR relevance to the UK’s law-making conduct and the implications thereof. Other cases and precedents shall be cited in due course. BOTH the EU and the ECHR shall be invoked. Domestically [in domestic UK judicial contexts] , we shall be invoking all the anti-discriminatory legislation as well.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely
KHOODEELAAR! LAW Unit
Postal service address:
1120 Hrs UK
1020 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 22 July 2008
This is further to our previous memos, questions, notices as served on the holder of the post of mayor of London on the matter of the 'Crossrail hole scam' as contained in and represented by the 'Crossrail Bill' which Harriet Harman has said would be conveyed as having been given the Royal assent today.
We are sending this to confirm that as soon as the existing UK domestic court procedures permit, we shall be filing applications to the High court against ALL those who have been in power to promote the Crossrail Bill and the scam. That includes the holder of the office of mayor in the name of London.
That means yourself.
We are therefore asking you to delay any repeat by ‘the mayor’ in the name of London of any fanatical, enthusiastic [including and implying exaggerated, unsubstantiated...] endorsement OF THE CROSSRAIL BILL [or ‘Crossrail Act’] UNTIL AFTER YOU HAVE READ AND RESPONDED TO OUR LATEST LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW QUESTIONS. Those questions are being prepared now and will be sent to you by 1400 Hrs UK time today.
Should you decide to ignore this and go ahead anyway in making the endorsing comment etc. we shall treat such action as being conclusive confirmation of your position. That position will warrant our treating you as the SECOND defendant in any court action.
We are asking you to DELAY ANY agreement with the DfT or any other party peddling the Crassrail scam until you have fully considered our objections and responded to us in full on our evidence and have fully responded to us within the law and within the constitution. By ‘the constitution’ we mean and also include the UK’s treaty obligations and draw your attention, as a brief pointer in this short updater communication, to the Factortame cases and THEIR relevance to the UK’s law-making conduct and the implications thereof. Other cases and precedents shall be cited in due course. BOTH the EU and the ECHR shall be invoked. Domestically [in domestic UK judicial contexts] , we shall be invoking all the anti-discriminatory legislation as well.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely
KHOODEELAAR! LAW Unit
Postal service address:
1120 Hrs UK
1020 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 22 July 2008
Khoodeelaar! final notice before court proceedings, sent to Boris Johnson: DON"T Endorse Crossrail scam!
Dear Mr Johnson
This is further to our previous memos, questions, notices as served on the holder of the post of mayor of London on the matter of the 'Crossrail hole scam' as contained in and represented by the 'Crossrail Bill' which Harriet Harman has said would be conveyed as having been given the Royal assent today.
We are sending this to confirm that as soon as the existing UK domestic court procedures permit, we shall be filing applications to the High court against ALL those who have been in power to promote the Crossrail Bill and the scam. That includes the holder of the office of mayor in the name of London.
That means yourself.
We are therefore asking you to delay any repeat by ‘the mayor’ in the name of London of any fanatical, enthusiastic [including and implying exaggerated, unsubstantiated...] endorsement OF THE CROSSRAIL BILL [or ‘Crossrail Act’] UNTIL AFTER YOU HAVE READ AND RESPONDED TO OUR LATEST LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW QUESTIONS. Those questions are being prepared now and will be sent to you by 1400 Hrs UK time today.
Should you decide to ignore this and go ahead anyway in making the endorsing comment etc. we shall treat such action as being conclusive confirmation of your position. That position will warrant our treating you as the SECOND defendant in any court action.
We are asking you to DELAY ANY agreement with the DfT or any other party peddling the Crassrail scam until you have fully considered our objections and responded to us in full on our evidence and have fully responded to us within the law and within the constitution. By ‘the constitution’ we mean and also include the UK’s treaty obligations and draw your attention, as a brief pointer in this short updater communication, to the Factortame cases and THEIR relevance to the UK’s law-making conduct and the implications thereof. Other cases and precedents shall be cited in due course. BOTH the EU and the ECHR shall be invoked. Domestically [in domestic UK judicial contexts] , we shall be invoking all the anti-discriminatory legislation as well.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely
KHOODEELAAR! LAW Unit
Postal service address:
1120 Hrs UK
1020 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 22 July 2008
This is further to our previous memos, questions, notices as served on the holder of the post of mayor of London on the matter of the 'Crossrail hole scam' as contained in and represented by the 'Crossrail Bill' which Harriet Harman has said would be conveyed as having been given the Royal assent today.
We are sending this to confirm that as soon as the existing UK domestic court procedures permit, we shall be filing applications to the High court against ALL those who have been in power to promote the Crossrail Bill and the scam. That includes the holder of the office of mayor in the name of London.
That means yourself.
We are therefore asking you to delay any repeat by ‘the mayor’ in the name of London of any fanatical, enthusiastic [including and implying exaggerated, unsubstantiated...] endorsement OF THE CROSSRAIL BILL [or ‘Crossrail Act’] UNTIL AFTER YOU HAVE READ AND RESPONDED TO OUR LATEST LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW QUESTIONS. Those questions are being prepared now and will be sent to you by 1400 Hrs UK time today.
Should you decide to ignore this and go ahead anyway in making the endorsing comment etc. we shall treat such action as being conclusive confirmation of your position. That position will warrant our treating you as the SECOND defendant in any court action.
We are asking you to DELAY ANY agreement with the DfT or any other party peddling the Crassrail scam until you have fully considered our objections and responded to us in full on our evidence and have fully responded to us within the law and within the constitution. By ‘the constitution’ we mean and also include the UK’s treaty obligations and draw your attention, as a brief pointer in this short updater communication, to the Factortame cases and THEIR relevance to the UK’s law-making conduct and the implications thereof. Other cases and precedents shall be cited in due course. BOTH the EU and the ECHR shall be invoked. Domestically [in domestic UK judicial contexts] , we shall be invoking all the anti-discriminatory legislation as well.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely
KHOODEELAAR! LAW Unit
Postal service address:
1120 Hrs UK
1020 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 22 July 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the 'Crossrail Bill' [a Bill in UK Parliament]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SGqe5VQwLHI/AAAAAAAABfc/MEjjMWby2dc/S226/Khoodeelaar!+try+this+logo.gif)
![London [Rupert Murdoched] Times, Wed. 7 May 2008](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SCIVsQ1wX-I/AAAAAAAAAs8/u1j4VZpbH0Y/S226/1676149.jpg)
