Muhammad Haque comments at 1420 Hrs GMT Saturday 5 April 2008:
The Khoodeelaar! campaign is 4 years and 3 months now. Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole agenda is in defence of the ordinary people in the East End of London. The campaign is against the Crossrail hole plot and against the Crossrail hole agenda.
How hard is it to spot the Big Business Crossrail hole plot agenda in action?
Quite easy.
By looking at the agenda of the ‘local Tower Hamlets Council.
By looking at the bias for Big business and for the Council as carried by the ‘local’ ‘newspaper’ ‘east London Idiotiser’. By looking at the dishonesty, incompetence, ignorance and opportunistic careerism of the ‘relvant’ 'councillors’. Flaunted as belonging to the 'dominant' of the alleged opposition packs on the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets council. These packs are even more enthusiastic for the agenda than may be possible to find in the formal statements attributable to the controlling clique on the local council.
Also the Crossrail hole agenda is easy to spot in the behaviour of the Big Business touts and agents and supporters of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ [now in the UK legislative ‘House of Lords’] who operate almost all of the ‘UK state-funded’ ‘community and outreach’ ‘projects’ in and across the ‘East End’. many of the fronters in and via those UK state-funded projects are ‘ethnicity-enabled’, ‘ethnicity-linked’, so that there is the appearance that in the ‘local decision making’ and the ‘local partnership’, there is ‘visible’ ‘ethnicity linked’ ‘input’ and ‘delivery’.
What in fact has been taking place is the exactly opposite of that.
No independent input. No needed delivery.
There has been input of servitude. And the delivery of brainwashing. And servile partnership with the destruction of the community.
Saturday, April 5, 2008
Poor Brian Paddick! He had dared to tell the truth on the crass Crossrail scam! Now the Lib Dumbs have padlocked Paddick's mouth. They will rue it...
By©Muhammad Haque
1055 Hrs GMT
1155 Hrs UK
London Saturday 5 April 2008
What AADHIKARonline said at 0655 GMT, is only echoed four hours later and uttered on the BBC Radio 4 in a rare moment of truthfulness.
That the Lib Dumbs in the UK are not being led by a competent let alone coherent leader. It is being led by Clueless Clegg. Clueless is the ‘title’ AADHIKARonline is conferring on confused Clegg for now and now onwards.
Ironically, it had to be the Daily Mail man, Peter Oborne who made the substantive comment about Nick Clegg’s ‘memorable moment with Morgan’, rather than the Daily Mirror place-man, which is what the formerly almost truthful Kevin McGuire must now be known as....
Peter Oborne got it right when he said that the Lib Dems’ Nick Clegg was coming across as being a BAD imitation of David Cameron..............
And even Kevin McGuire said that Clegg's willingness to answer that [Piers Morgan] queston [about the number of Clegg's sexual partners ‘so far’] was reinforcing the view that Clegg was indeed a calamity Leader [of the Lib Dumbs!].
Clegg was equally BAD at posturing in parliament when he exhibited that very immature propensity to dramatics...
He could not carry it off and had to spend the following 48 hours recovering from the damage he had inflicted on himself...
The vast majority of his minority opposition party MPs showed two fingers to him... For them, that was the height of THEIR ‘independence’. Which in itself was a con. THEY were responding to their own ‘needs’ come the next elections in their constituencies...
They could only do that because they got it right, so far as it went, while he looked and acted clueless on the matter of the say on the UK constitution.... in the framework as defined by the European union...
He was pretending to be for democratic say in [and by extension of that implied logic, BY] Parliament when in fact he had no faith [or not sufficiently clear and credible faith] in democracy... His contradictions came instantly back and bit him all over his ‘fresh’ [!] image as ‘the new leader’.
No amount of professed proficiency in languages could hide the message that was getting across and reaching Brussels [a former locale of his alleged achievements] that Clegg was not upto it. Not when it came to leading coherently and constitutionally on and about Europe while serving the cause of much needed democracy in a member country’s ‘sovereign’ [!] Parliament.
That, VERY briefly, is the context in which to look at the disgraceful act of immorality that the Lib Dumbs have perpetrated at the behest of the Blairing Browning agency of Big Business.
The Lib Dumbs were unprepared in january this year when I caught them at it... letting Brian Paddick tell the truth!
Only a bit. But the truth nonetheless.
It was such a rare act that I said I found it astonishing....
And how accurate I was to say that finding a Lib Dumb party candidate telling the truth.. astonishing!
They have now, 3 months it has taken them. ‘corrected’ the situation and have in effect ordered paddick to join the lying machine that the Lib Dumbs have operated on almost all ‘mainstream’ issues.
Poor Paddick! It is like they have rhetorically padlocked his otherwise candid mouth on the crassness of Crossrail!
Padlocking Paddick will not pay the Lib Dumbs at all...
[To be continued]
______________________
By©Muhammad Haque
0655 GMT
London Saturday 5 April 2008
On another Saturday, in january 2008, I had reason to refer to the UK 'mainstream' 'political party' the Lib Dems in the context of our campaign against the Crossrail hole.
I was not convinced, as I wrote then, that their 'party' candidate Brian Paddick, had quite understood how corrupt the Lib Dumbs' party machine was.
Here I am reproducing the main ‘Croydon Guardian’ web site piece on which I commented and the comment itself.
Why today?
Because the Lib Dumbs HAVE made sure to shut Paddick up on Crossrail. As far as Crassrail was concerned, they have belatedly realised, [after counting the numbers of sexual partners that Calamity Clegg has had or rechecking on the moral compass of Sarah T who has displayed such allegedly accurate knowledge despite her mother ‘watching’ Sarah T’s focus on the frequency of sexual contacts between Tony Blair and Cherie Booth!] Paddick must only tell lies, thus making Paddick eat the bit of truth about Crossrail that he had said and the bit that I had found out about.
"
I am writing to put on the record my sense of utter astonishment at coming across a quotation in your item apparently reporting the position on Crossrail as taken by Brian Paddock, one of the candidates at the scheduled 1 May 2008 election for the ‘post of mayor of London’.
You quote him as follows:-
“There's a bias against commuters in south west London. Money going into projects like Crossrail don't benefit them at all," he said.
Did he actually say those words?
I am only asking this because in the period since he has been the declared candidate for the post for the Liberal Democrats, Mr Paddick has not come across as making any similar statement about Crossrail. This is very serious.
Also, when he appeared on the ITV programme ' packaged as a ‘debate’ between the three candidates including Mr Paddick and Boris Johnson and the incumbent Ken Livingstone, Mr Paddick was the one that opted OUT of that segment of the broadcast programme which was dedicated to the issue of CROSSRAIL.
In fact Crossrail was the subject that was shown on the ITV programme to have caused one of the main ‘forceful’ exchanges between Johnson and Livingstone, with Brian Paddick fading out of focus!
So what is the point that he is making in the statement you attribute to him?
Also, he has NOT made any comment similar to the one you report him as having made apparently questioning the cost of Crossrail, about the Crossrail scheme in relation to the main role played by all the ‘ Lib Dem spokespersons’ on transport in London as evident on their records .
Nor did Mr Paddick question the promotion of Crossrail that was sung by Lib Deems MP Susan Kramer at the ‘Third Reading’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as held in the House of Commons on 13 December 2007.
Equally, Mr Paddick has not disowned, on the record and in public the position on Crossrail as exhibited by any of the others in the Lib Dems party who have been part of the parade of the pro-Crossrail lobby over the past four years.
That parade has included the Lib Dem MP Lynne Featherstone who in 2005-2006 was one of the very few MPs that went to the verge of hysteria in denouncing both Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling for their alleged reluctance to provide the public funding for the Crossrail scheme.
Muhammad Haque
Organiser
KHOODEELAAR!
The East London Campaign Against the Crossrail ‘hole plot’ Bill
1545 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 12 January 2008
Quote | Report this post
The CROYDON GUARDIAN web site had carried the piece as follows:
Paddick and Blair make up ahead of election
Exclusive By Dan Menhinnitt
Comment | Read Comments (8)
Lib Dems mayoral candidate Brian Paddick
Mayoral hopeful Brian Paddick says he has buried the hatchet with his old boss Met Commissioner Sir Ian Blair.
Mr Paddick, a former Lambeth borough commander who went to Sutton Manor High School, retired after clashing with Ian Blair over the handling of the Jean Charles de Menezes shooting in July, 2005.
In an exclusive interview with yourlocalguardian.co.uk the 49-year-old says he met with Commissioner Blair recently and the pair are now on good terms.
"I think we are both adult enough that if I was mayor and he Commissioner we could work together," he said.
He added that the meeting went so well Sir Ian dismissed his notetaker.
Speaking at yourlocalguardian.co.uk's Sutton offices he also said south west Londoners can expect an improved and safer transport system if he wins the May election.
advertisement
The Lib Dem candidate said he would end transport policies which only favoured central London and draft in police to tackle teen crime on buses.
"There's a bias against commuters in south west London. Money going into projects like Crossrail don't benefit them at all," he said.
He added: "Some people in the south west are paying much more for journeys under the current zone structure. I want a fair fare for commuters in south west London."
According to Mr Paddick transport priorities would be decided in consultation with local councils and elected officials.
He also said he wanted to see more police officers on bus routes known to suffer from antisocial behaviour, and advocated removing free travel from teen troublemakers.
"I want to take away the right to free travel from those who abuse it rather than a blanket ban on free travel for teens."
And despite the pressures of getting ready to launch his mayoral campaign on Monday he still had time to pop in and visit his 87-year-old mum.
"She lives just round the corner in Sutton. She'd never forgive me if I came to here and didn't pop in and see her," he joked.
Quote | Report this post
Posted by: Muhammad Haque, London UK on 3:47pm Sat 12 Jan 08
quote
I am writing to put on the record my sense of utter astonishment at coming across a quotation in your item apparently reporting the position on Crossrail as taken by Brian Paddock, one of the candidates at the scheduled 1 May 2008 election for the ‘post of mayor of London’.
You quote him as follows:-
“There's a bias against commuters in south west London. Money going into projects like Crossrail don't benefit them at all," he said.
Did he actually say those words?
I am only asking this because in the period since he has been the declared candidate for the post for the Liberal Democrats, Mr Paddick has not come across as making any similar statement about Crossrail. This is very serious.
Also, when he appeared on the ITV programme ' packaged as a ‘debate’ between the three candidates including Mr Paddick and Boris Johnson and the incumbent Ken Livingstone, Mr Paddick was the one that opted OUT of that segment of the broadcast programme which was dedicated to the issue of CROSSRAIL.
In fact Crossrail was the subject that was shown on the ITV programme to have caused one of the main ‘forceful’ exchanges between Johnson and Livingstone, with Brian Paddick fading out of focus!
So what is the point that he is making in the statement you attribute to him?
Also, he has NOT made any comment similar to the one you report him as having made apparently questioning the cost of Crossrail, about the Crossrail scheme in relation to the main role played by all the ‘ Lib Dem spokespersons’ on transport in London as evident on their records .
Nor did Mr Paddick question the promotion of Crossrail that was sung by Lib Deems MP Susan Kramer at the ‘Third Reading’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as held in the House of Commons on 13 December 2007.
Equally, Mr Paddick has not disowned, on the record and in public the position on Crossrail as exhibited by any of the others in the Lib Dems party who have been part of the parade of the pro-Crossrail lobby over the past four years.
That parade has included the Lib Dem MP Lynne Featherstone who in 2005-2006 was one of the very few MPs that went to the verge of hysteria in denouncing both Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling for their alleged reluctance to provide the public funding for the Crossrail scheme.
Muhammad Haque
Organiser
KHOODEELAAR!
The East London Campaign Against the Crossrail ‘hole plot’ Bill
1545 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 12 January 2008
"
1055 Hrs GMT
1155 Hrs UK
London Saturday 5 April 2008
What AADHIKARonline said at 0655 GMT, is only echoed four hours later and uttered on the BBC Radio 4 in a rare moment of truthfulness.
That the Lib Dumbs in the UK are not being led by a competent let alone coherent leader. It is being led by Clueless Clegg. Clueless is the ‘title’ AADHIKARonline is conferring on confused Clegg for now and now onwards.
Ironically, it had to be the Daily Mail man, Peter Oborne who made the substantive comment about Nick Clegg’s ‘memorable moment with Morgan’, rather than the Daily Mirror place-man, which is what the formerly almost truthful Kevin McGuire must now be known as....
Peter Oborne got it right when he said that the Lib Dems’ Nick Clegg was coming across as being a BAD imitation of David Cameron..............
And even Kevin McGuire said that Clegg's willingness to answer that [Piers Morgan] queston [about the number of Clegg's sexual partners ‘so far’] was reinforcing the view that Clegg was indeed a calamity Leader [of the Lib Dumbs!].
Clegg was equally BAD at posturing in parliament when he exhibited that very immature propensity to dramatics...
He could not carry it off and had to spend the following 48 hours recovering from the damage he had inflicted on himself...
The vast majority of his minority opposition party MPs showed two fingers to him... For them, that was the height of THEIR ‘independence’. Which in itself was a con. THEY were responding to their own ‘needs’ come the next elections in their constituencies...
They could only do that because they got it right, so far as it went, while he looked and acted clueless on the matter of the say on the UK constitution.... in the framework as defined by the European union...
He was pretending to be for democratic say in [and by extension of that implied logic, BY] Parliament when in fact he had no faith [or not sufficiently clear and credible faith] in democracy... His contradictions came instantly back and bit him all over his ‘fresh’ [!] image as ‘the new leader’.
No amount of professed proficiency in languages could hide the message that was getting across and reaching Brussels [a former locale of his alleged achievements] that Clegg was not upto it. Not when it came to leading coherently and constitutionally on and about Europe while serving the cause of much needed democracy in a member country’s ‘sovereign’ [!] Parliament.
That, VERY briefly, is the context in which to look at the disgraceful act of immorality that the Lib Dumbs have perpetrated at the behest of the Blairing Browning agency of Big Business.
The Lib Dumbs were unprepared in january this year when I caught them at it... letting Brian Paddick tell the truth!
Only a bit. But the truth nonetheless.
It was such a rare act that I said I found it astonishing....
And how accurate I was to say that finding a Lib Dumb party candidate telling the truth.. astonishing!
They have now, 3 months it has taken them. ‘corrected’ the situation and have in effect ordered paddick to join the lying machine that the Lib Dumbs have operated on almost all ‘mainstream’ issues.
Poor Paddick! It is like they have rhetorically padlocked his otherwise candid mouth on the crassness of Crossrail!
Padlocking Paddick will not pay the Lib Dumbs at all...
[To be continued]
______________________
By©Muhammad Haque
0655 GMT
London Saturday 5 April 2008
On another Saturday, in january 2008, I had reason to refer to the UK 'mainstream' 'political party' the Lib Dems in the context of our campaign against the Crossrail hole.
I was not convinced, as I wrote then, that their 'party' candidate Brian Paddick, had quite understood how corrupt the Lib Dumbs' party machine was.
Here I am reproducing the main ‘Croydon Guardian’ web site piece on which I commented and the comment itself.
Why today?
Because the Lib Dumbs HAVE made sure to shut Paddick up on Crossrail. As far as Crassrail was concerned, they have belatedly realised, [after counting the numbers of sexual partners that Calamity Clegg has had or rechecking on the moral compass of Sarah T who has displayed such allegedly accurate knowledge despite her mother ‘watching’ Sarah T’s focus on the frequency of sexual contacts between Tony Blair and Cherie Booth!] Paddick must only tell lies, thus making Paddick eat the bit of truth about Crossrail that he had said and the bit that I had found out about.
"
I am writing to put on the record my sense of utter astonishment at coming across a quotation in your item apparently reporting the position on Crossrail as taken by Brian Paddock, one of the candidates at the scheduled 1 May 2008 election for the ‘post of mayor of London’.
You quote him as follows:-
“There's a bias against commuters in south west London. Money going into projects like Crossrail don't benefit them at all," he said.
Did he actually say those words?
I am only asking this because in the period since he has been the declared candidate for the post for the Liberal Democrats, Mr Paddick has not come across as making any similar statement about Crossrail. This is very serious.
Also, when he appeared on the ITV programme ' packaged as a ‘debate’ between the three candidates including Mr Paddick and Boris Johnson and the incumbent Ken Livingstone, Mr Paddick was the one that opted OUT of that segment of the broadcast programme which was dedicated to the issue of CROSSRAIL.
In fact Crossrail was the subject that was shown on the ITV programme to have caused one of the main ‘forceful’ exchanges between Johnson and Livingstone, with Brian Paddick fading out of focus!
So what is the point that he is making in the statement you attribute to him?
Also, he has NOT made any comment similar to the one you report him as having made apparently questioning the cost of Crossrail, about the Crossrail scheme in relation to the main role played by all the ‘ Lib Dem spokespersons’ on transport in London as evident on their records .
Nor did Mr Paddick question the promotion of Crossrail that was sung by Lib Deems MP Susan Kramer at the ‘Third Reading’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as held in the House of Commons on 13 December 2007.
Equally, Mr Paddick has not disowned, on the record and in public the position on Crossrail as exhibited by any of the others in the Lib Dems party who have been part of the parade of the pro-Crossrail lobby over the past four years.
That parade has included the Lib Dem MP Lynne Featherstone who in 2005-2006 was one of the very few MPs that went to the verge of hysteria in denouncing both Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling for their alleged reluctance to provide the public funding for the Crossrail scheme.
Muhammad Haque
Organiser
KHOODEELAAR!
The East London Campaign Against the Crossrail ‘hole plot’ Bill
1545 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 12 January 2008
Quote | Report this post
The CROYDON GUARDIAN web site had carried the piece as follows:
Paddick and Blair make up ahead of election
Exclusive By Dan Menhinnitt
Comment | Read Comments (8)
Lib Dems mayoral candidate Brian Paddick
Mayoral hopeful Brian Paddick says he has buried the hatchet with his old boss Met Commissioner Sir Ian Blair.
Mr Paddick, a former Lambeth borough commander who went to Sutton Manor High School, retired after clashing with Ian Blair over the handling of the Jean Charles de Menezes shooting in July, 2005.
In an exclusive interview with yourlocalguardian.co.uk the 49-year-old says he met with Commissioner Blair recently and the pair are now on good terms.
"I think we are both adult enough that if I was mayor and he Commissioner we could work together," he said.
He added that the meeting went so well Sir Ian dismissed his notetaker.
Speaking at yourlocalguardian.co.uk's Sutton offices he also said south west Londoners can expect an improved and safer transport system if he wins the May election.
advertisement
The Lib Dem candidate said he would end transport policies which only favoured central London and draft in police to tackle teen crime on buses.
"There's a bias against commuters in south west London. Money going into projects like Crossrail don't benefit them at all," he said.
He added: "Some people in the south west are paying much more for journeys under the current zone structure. I want a fair fare for commuters in south west London."
According to Mr Paddick transport priorities would be decided in consultation with local councils and elected officials.
He also said he wanted to see more police officers on bus routes known to suffer from antisocial behaviour, and advocated removing free travel from teen troublemakers.
"I want to take away the right to free travel from those who abuse it rather than a blanket ban on free travel for teens."
And despite the pressures of getting ready to launch his mayoral campaign on Monday he still had time to pop in and visit his 87-year-old mum.
"She lives just round the corner in Sutton. She'd never forgive me if I came to here and didn't pop in and see her," he joked.
Quote | Report this post
Posted by: Muhammad Haque, London UK on 3:47pm Sat 12 Jan 08
quote
I am writing to put on the record my sense of utter astonishment at coming across a quotation in your item apparently reporting the position on Crossrail as taken by Brian Paddock, one of the candidates at the scheduled 1 May 2008 election for the ‘post of mayor of London’.
You quote him as follows:-
“There's a bias against commuters in south west London. Money going into projects like Crossrail don't benefit them at all," he said.
Did he actually say those words?
I am only asking this because in the period since he has been the declared candidate for the post for the Liberal Democrats, Mr Paddick has not come across as making any similar statement about Crossrail. This is very serious.
Also, when he appeared on the ITV programme ' packaged as a ‘debate’ between the three candidates including Mr Paddick and Boris Johnson and the incumbent Ken Livingstone, Mr Paddick was the one that opted OUT of that segment of the broadcast programme which was dedicated to the issue of CROSSRAIL.
In fact Crossrail was the subject that was shown on the ITV programme to have caused one of the main ‘forceful’ exchanges between Johnson and Livingstone, with Brian Paddick fading out of focus!
So what is the point that he is making in the statement you attribute to him?
Also, he has NOT made any comment similar to the one you report him as having made apparently questioning the cost of Crossrail, about the Crossrail scheme in relation to the main role played by all the ‘ Lib Dem spokespersons’ on transport in London as evident on their records .
Nor did Mr Paddick question the promotion of Crossrail that was sung by Lib Deems MP Susan Kramer at the ‘Third Reading’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as held in the House of Commons on 13 December 2007.
Equally, Mr Paddick has not disowned, on the record and in public the position on Crossrail as exhibited by any of the others in the Lib Dems party who have been part of the parade of the pro-Crossrail lobby over the past four years.
That parade has included the Lib Dem MP Lynne Featherstone who in 2005-2006 was one of the very few MPs that went to the verge of hysteria in denouncing both Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling for their alleged reluctance to provide the public funding for the Crossrail scheme.
Muhammad Haque
Organiser
KHOODEELAAR!
The East London Campaign Against the Crossrail ‘hole plot’ Bill
1545 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 12 January 2008
"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the 'Crossrail Bill' [a Bill in UK Parliament]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SGqe5VQwLHI/AAAAAAAABfc/MEjjMWby2dc/S226/Khoodeelaar!+try+this+logo.gif)
![London [Rupert Murdoched] Times, Wed. 7 May 2008](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitiFRN6uO_MOdYMby0s7ow2zcBaewOKfl3k4QdCPcahu1IKXx6sl7Gs4aO9VrAhN8gQJvYb1a2JnODsTUsMks_LtoZVuqc64whMkMitNKVz1bijPST853uNwRNG8x2PVFl1kqRez8M3b-j/s226/1676149.jpg)
