By©Muhammad Haque
1310 GMT 1410 Hrs UK Time London Saturday 17 May 2008:
Khoodeelaar! No to “Crossrail hole plot ...” CAMPAIGN has taken the lead in auditing and in publishing the findings of the audit of all the public and the publicly paid for agencies, bodies and outfits that are operated or funded or kept in place IN THE NAME of the people of the ordinary East End of London....
As an integral part of this acton programme, Khoodeelaar! has adopted the analysis of the longer standing movement in defence of human rights in context in the East End of London that movement on evidence found that the sole ‘local’ commrcially run ‘newspaper’ in the name of the East End of London, has indeed been the East London Apartheider. The East London Idiotiser.
The East London A********r is not a responsible newspaper if the criteria of responsibility is in any way linked with the attention given to the behaviour of the bodies, groups, personnel that are publicly paid for in order to provide service to the people of the East End of London.
As we have pointed out in the past four years in the context of the Khoodeelaar! campaign against ‘the Big Business Crossrail hole plot against the East End’, the East London Apartheider has lied persistently in favour of the lying and the Crossrail hole plot-inviting clique on Tower Hamlets Council.
It lied in March 2006 and untruthfully, prejudicially, outrageously offensively carried a lying piece giving credit to the then typifier of the Council for the then just announced retreat by the then Crossrail hole plot Minister [‘Secretary of State for Transport’] Alistair Darling on the planned Crossrail dirt hole in the Hanbury Street [off Brick Lane], London E1.
Later in the year, the East London Idiotiser carried another series of plugs praising Christine Gilbert and Michael Keith. There was no ground, no basis, no fact for their doing so. Not on the conduct of either GILBERT or Keith in terms of what their parts had been in the polices that so aggravated against the overall interests and the specific interests,m needs and rights of the people of and in the ordinary East and of London.
Why did the East London Idiotiser do that?
Did it do it out of ignorance?
Did it do it because it did;t know better?
No. The Khoodeelaar! campaign had made available EXCLUSIVELY researched , original evidence ti the ‘editorial staff’ of the 'East London Idiotiser' over the previous YEARS showing the breath, the extents of the part played by both Christine Gi,bert and Michael Keith in INVITING the Crossrail hole plot upon and against the East End of London.
The evidence, the analysis, the finding that Khoodeelaar! provided cannot be denied or evidentially challenged,. This is so because all our findings and our conclusions have been adequately and transparently and comprehensively sourced. And those sources are themselves parts of the UK Government operation. Including of the other Big Business affiliates and colluder institutions, agencies, outfits, outlets such as and including the entirety of the UK Big Business mainstream media. As typified by the Financial Times and the BBC. Besides those, the others are equally of such undeniably pro-Big Business, CRASSrail hole plot-peddling affiliation that no-one, least of all Michael Keith or Christine Gilbert [both of whom have been extensively associated with the Big Business propaganda operation misconducted via the ‘Tower Hamlets Council’] would credibly make even a suggestion that those sources were open to question.
For if they did, they themselves [Gilbert and Keith] would be condemning themselves by such evidentially untenable audacity.
So the ‘East London Idiotiser’ failed on purpose. It failed to tell the truth out of prejudice and out of deeply corrupted mentality on the parts of its key decision-making ‘personnel’.
But they made the decision, on each and every occasion that they devoted promotional space and words to the Crossrail hole plot-inviting clique on Tower Hamlets ‘local’ Council, knowing that they [The Idiotiser] were adding to the lies and that they were doing so despite also claiming that their commercial title - [the Idiotiser] was in business allegedly to serve the community in the East End of London.
A more brazen contradiction would be hard to come across in context.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
On the facts of the persistent misconduct, misreporting, mispromotion of the corrupt Council clique by the Arch-lying ‘East London Idiotiser’, going all out to pocket as much of the Council’s ‘advertising’ revenue as they could contrive to justify they ‘deserved’..... ......
[To be continued]
Saturday, May 17, 2008
Muhammad Haque ethical commentary on the Brown fronted Blaired state in the ‘United Kingdom’ of degeneration, immorality and greed...by the haves as
The Muhammad Haque ethical commentary on the Brown fronted Blaired state in the ‘United Kingdom’ of degeneration, immorality and greed...by the haves as agsinst the havenots....
0840 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday 17 May 2008
If the contents and the thrust of the really timeserving, careerist and media-peddling Raymond Shoddy, currently fronting the BBC's self-justificatory and immoral 'newswatch' slot, are any guide, then the BBC is INDEED as shoddy as Raymond and should be scrapped...
This is another call for a thorough review of publicly paid for broadcasting outfit that serves in all intents and purposes as the state controlled broadcasting and media = meaning PROPAGANDA for the state and the status quo equivalent that would be found in what even the BBC immorally derides a totalitarian state.
For the second time in three days, the BBC mounted ‘Lauren Booth’ ‘as linked to Tony Blair’ as a ‘worthy’ commentator on the affairs of state! On Thursday, they had her do a morally ambivalent promotion job for the side business that Cherie ‘Booth’ ‘Blair’ had embarked on via Rupert Murdoch’s SUN and the Times.
It seems that the BBC is getting shoddier by ‘the event’.
The ‘event’ here is intended to imply and convey what Harold Macmillan meant by ‘events’ when he had reportedly said, ‘Events, dear boy, events’ [that made the difference....].
Whenever an ‘event’ is in the news of the day or of the week, the BBC agenda setters hastily add another example of their breach of the universal code of evidence and factual accuracy.
They rush in with a token that links - so they assume - the BBC to the ‘hear of’ the particular events!
So we suffered the spectacle of a barely articulate and barely significant ‘panellist’ Rachel Johnson, ‘sister’ of Boris Johnson, being flaunted on the David Dimbleby fronted Question Time on Thursday following the announcement of the result of the London elections for a ‘mayor in the name of the people of London’ and this last Thursday, self-respecting ‘viewers’ of the BBC TV slot had to pout up with the latest display of Lauren Booth, inappropriately described as ‘Writer and Broadcaster’, giving her own commercial in support of Cherie Booth ‘Blair’ as the ‘author’ and as the Liverpool working class girl who made it [to No 10 Downing Street] !
Lauren Booth should have been described as the ‘half-sister’ to Cherie Booth WHO HAD launched herself almost within days of the May 1997 UK generally election when Cherie Blair was able to arrive at No 10 Downing Street.
Lauren Booth might have existed as a ‘writer’ or as a ‘broadcaster’ Moore 2 May 1997 but she had not been noticed until the BBC and other broadcast and 'mainstream' media', later including [and in particular] the Mail on sunday decided to go into a subcontract with her ina miniature joint venture....
They were capitalising on the very tenuous and threadbare [in the context of society, politics, democracy and accountability] links that Lauren had with the Tony Blair regime just installed.
For ALL the past 11 years since Lauren Booth was mounted on the mainstream media abased on the alleged ‘half’ sibling relations with Cherie Blair,. lauren Booth had not made any contribution that objective commentators or observers of the ‘pair in power’ had not made.
In fact Lauren’s surfacing on the media has been measurable by the height or the level of media presence that has been attached to Cherie Booth ‘Blair’ over the years....
All the while, Lauren Booth has been allowed the media spots - and the not insignificant cash that has been placed into her direction including in the direction of her ‘place’ in ‘France’ on the most tenuous of evidential grounds.
This latest appearance today [Saturday 17 May 2008] when she talked to the BBC News Breakfast programme, was the most embarrassing. And inappropriate. She is evidently of the wrong view that Cherie Blair is ‘working class’, that she had not had much material possessions as a could etc....
And so she feels that on 17 May 2008, almost a year after Cherie had left the ‘official address’ of ‘Britain’s Prime Minister’ and two days after she was told [by another, sitting, ‘judge’] to resign as a ‘judge’ because she was bringing the ‘legal profession’ into disrepute by her ‘vulgar, obscene indulgences’ in publishing the most private of details about herself [so disgusting the spread of the public that even someone so lowly-esteemed in public as Graham Norton, was able to claim a ‘higher’ ground [in ‘taste’ if not in morality necessarily] as compared to Cherie Blair, as Norton showed on BBC TV on Friday night 16 May 2008].
[To be continued]
0840 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday 17 May 2008
If the contents and the thrust of the really timeserving, careerist and media-peddling Raymond Shoddy, currently fronting the BBC's self-justificatory and immoral 'newswatch' slot, are any guide, then the BBC is INDEED as shoddy as Raymond and should be scrapped...
This is another call for a thorough review of publicly paid for broadcasting outfit that serves in all intents and purposes as the state controlled broadcasting and media = meaning PROPAGANDA for the state and the status quo equivalent that would be found in what even the BBC immorally derides a totalitarian state.
For the second time in three days, the BBC mounted ‘Lauren Booth’ ‘as linked to Tony Blair’ as a ‘worthy’ commentator on the affairs of state! On Thursday, they had her do a morally ambivalent promotion job for the side business that Cherie ‘Booth’ ‘Blair’ had embarked on via Rupert Murdoch’s SUN and the Times.
It seems that the BBC is getting shoddier by ‘the event’.
The ‘event’ here is intended to imply and convey what Harold Macmillan meant by ‘events’ when he had reportedly said, ‘Events, dear boy, events’ [that made the difference....].
Whenever an ‘event’ is in the news of the day or of the week, the BBC agenda setters hastily add another example of their breach of the universal code of evidence and factual accuracy.
They rush in with a token that links - so they assume - the BBC to the ‘hear of’ the particular events!
So we suffered the spectacle of a barely articulate and barely significant ‘panellist’ Rachel Johnson, ‘sister’ of Boris Johnson, being flaunted on the David Dimbleby fronted Question Time on Thursday following the announcement of the result of the London elections for a ‘mayor in the name of the people of London’ and this last Thursday, self-respecting ‘viewers’ of the BBC TV slot had to pout up with the latest display of Lauren Booth, inappropriately described as ‘Writer and Broadcaster’, giving her own commercial in support of Cherie Booth ‘Blair’ as the ‘author’ and as the Liverpool working class girl who made it [to No 10 Downing Street] !
Lauren Booth should have been described as the ‘half-sister’ to Cherie Booth WHO HAD launched herself almost within days of the May 1997 UK generally election when Cherie Blair was able to arrive at No 10 Downing Street.
Lauren Booth might have existed as a ‘writer’ or as a ‘broadcaster’ Moore 2 May 1997 but she had not been noticed until the BBC and other broadcast and 'mainstream' media', later including [and in particular] the Mail on sunday decided to go into a subcontract with her ina miniature joint venture....
They were capitalising on the very tenuous and threadbare [in the context of society, politics, democracy and accountability] links that Lauren had with the Tony Blair regime just installed.
For ALL the past 11 years since Lauren Booth was mounted on the mainstream media abased on the alleged ‘half’ sibling relations with Cherie Blair,. lauren Booth had not made any contribution that objective commentators or observers of the ‘pair in power’ had not made.
In fact Lauren’s surfacing on the media has been measurable by the height or the level of media presence that has been attached to Cherie Booth ‘Blair’ over the years....
All the while, Lauren Booth has been allowed the media spots - and the not insignificant cash that has been placed into her direction including in the direction of her ‘place’ in ‘France’ on the most tenuous of evidential grounds.
This latest appearance today [Saturday 17 May 2008] when she talked to the BBC News Breakfast programme, was the most embarrassing. And inappropriate. She is evidently of the wrong view that Cherie Blair is ‘working class’, that she had not had much material possessions as a could etc....
And so she feels that on 17 May 2008, almost a year after Cherie had left the ‘official address’ of ‘Britain’s Prime Minister’ and two days after she was told [by another, sitting, ‘judge’] to resign as a ‘judge’ because she was bringing the ‘legal profession’ into disrepute by her ‘vulgar, obscene indulgences’ in publishing the most private of details about herself [so disgusting the spread of the public that even someone so lowly-esteemed in public as Graham Norton, was able to claim a ‘higher’ ground [in ‘taste’ if not in morality necessarily] as compared to Cherie Blair, as Norton showed on BBC TV on Friday night 16 May 2008].
[To be continued]
Cherie Blair's widely derided lack of taste and dignity, as exhibited via her peddled memoirs, is to be also found in the BBC's lack of ethics....
The Muhammad Haque ethical commentary in the Brown fronted Blaired state of degeneration, immorality and greed...
0840 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday 17 May 2008
If the confronts and the thrust of the really timeserving Raymond Shoddy fronting the BBC's self-justificatory and immoral 'newswatch' slot is any guide, the BBC is as shoddy as Raymond and should be scrapped...
This is another call for a thorough review of publicly paid for broadcasting outfit that serves in all intents and purposes as the state controlled broadcasting and media = meaning PROPAGANDA for the state and the status quo equivalent that would be found in what even the BBC immorally derides a totalitarian state.
For the second time in three days, the BBC mounted ‘Lauren Booth’ ‘as linked to Tony Blair’ as a ‘worthy’ commentator on the affairs of state! On Thursday, they had her do a morally ambivalent promotion job for the side business that Cherie ‘Booth’ ‘Blair’ had embarked on via Rupert Murdoch’s SUN and the Times.
It seems that the BBC is getting shoddier by ‘the event’.
The ‘event’ here is intended to imply and convey what Harold Macmillan meant by ‘events’ when he had reportedly said, ‘Events, dear boy, events’ [that made the difference....].
Whenever an ‘event’ is in the news of the day or of the week, the BBC agenda setters hastily add another example of their breach of the universal code of evidence and factual accuracy.
They rush in with a token that links - so they assume - the BBC to the ‘hear of’ the particular events!
So we suffered the spectacle of a barely articulate and barely significant ‘panellist’ Rachel Johnson, ‘sister’ of Boris Johnson, being flaunted on the David Dimbleby fronted Question Time on Thursday following the announcement of the result of the London elections for a ‘mayor in the name of the people of London’ and this last Thursday, self-respecting ‘viewers’ of the BBC TV slot had to pout up with the latest display of Lauren Booth, inappropriately described as ‘Writer and Broadcaster’, giving her own commercial in support of Cherie Booth ‘Blair’ as the ‘author’ and as the Liverpool working class girl who made it [to No 10 Downing Street] !
Lauren Booth should have been described as the ‘half-sister’ to Cherie Booth WHO HAD launched herself almost within days of the May 1997 UK generally election when Cherie Blair was able to arrive at No 10 Downing Street.
Lauren Booth might have existed as a ‘writer’ or as a ‘broadcaster’ Moore 2 May 1997 but she had not been noticed until the BBC and other broadcast and 'mainstream' media', later including [and in particular] the Mail on sunday decided to go into a subcontract with her ina miniature joint venture....
They were capitalising on the very tenuous and threadbare [in the context of society, politics, democracy and accountability] links that Lauren had with the Tony Blair regime just installed.
For ALL the past 11 years since Lauren Booth was mounted on the mainstream media abased on the alleged ‘half’ sibling relations with Cherie Blair,. lauren Booth had not made any contribution that objective commentators or observers of the ‘pair in power’ had not made.
In fact Lauren’s surfacing on the media has been measurable by the height or the level of media presence that has been attached to Cherie Booth ‘Blair’ over the years....
All the while, Lauren Booth has been allowed the media spots - and the not insignificant cash that has been placed into her direction including in the direction of her ‘place’ in ‘France’ on the most tenuous of evidential grounds.
This latest appearance today [Saturday 17 May 2008] when she talked to the BBC News Breakfast programme, was the most embarrassing. And inappropriate. She is evidently of the wrong view that Cherie Blair is ‘working class’, that she had not had much material possessions as a could etc....
And so she feels that on 17 May 2008, almost a year after Cherie had left the ‘official address’ of ‘Britain’s Prime Minister’ and two days after she was told [by another, sitting, ‘judge’] to resign as a ‘judge’ because she was bringing the ‘legal profession’ into disrepute by her ‘vulgar, obscene indulgences’ in publishing the most private of details about herself [so disgusting the spread of the public that even someone so lowly-esteemed in public as Graham Norton, was able to claim a ‘higher’ ground [in ‘taste’ if not in morality necessarily] as compared to Cherie Blair, as Norton showed on BBC TV on Friday night 16 May 2008].
[To be continued]
0840 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday 17 May 2008
If the confronts and the thrust of the really timeserving Raymond Shoddy fronting the BBC's self-justificatory and immoral 'newswatch' slot is any guide, the BBC is as shoddy as Raymond and should be scrapped...
This is another call for a thorough review of publicly paid for broadcasting outfit that serves in all intents and purposes as the state controlled broadcasting and media = meaning PROPAGANDA for the state and the status quo equivalent that would be found in what even the BBC immorally derides a totalitarian state.
For the second time in three days, the BBC mounted ‘Lauren Booth’ ‘as linked to Tony Blair’ as a ‘worthy’ commentator on the affairs of state! On Thursday, they had her do a morally ambivalent promotion job for the side business that Cherie ‘Booth’ ‘Blair’ had embarked on via Rupert Murdoch’s SUN and the Times.
It seems that the BBC is getting shoddier by ‘the event’.
The ‘event’ here is intended to imply and convey what Harold Macmillan meant by ‘events’ when he had reportedly said, ‘Events, dear boy, events’ [that made the difference....].
Whenever an ‘event’ is in the news of the day or of the week, the BBC agenda setters hastily add another example of their breach of the universal code of evidence and factual accuracy.
They rush in with a token that links - so they assume - the BBC to the ‘hear of’ the particular events!
So we suffered the spectacle of a barely articulate and barely significant ‘panellist’ Rachel Johnson, ‘sister’ of Boris Johnson, being flaunted on the David Dimbleby fronted Question Time on Thursday following the announcement of the result of the London elections for a ‘mayor in the name of the people of London’ and this last Thursday, self-respecting ‘viewers’ of the BBC TV slot had to pout up with the latest display of Lauren Booth, inappropriately described as ‘Writer and Broadcaster’, giving her own commercial in support of Cherie Booth ‘Blair’ as the ‘author’ and as the Liverpool working class girl who made it [to No 10 Downing Street] !
Lauren Booth should have been described as the ‘half-sister’ to Cherie Booth WHO HAD launched herself almost within days of the May 1997 UK generally election when Cherie Blair was able to arrive at No 10 Downing Street.
Lauren Booth might have existed as a ‘writer’ or as a ‘broadcaster’ Moore 2 May 1997 but she had not been noticed until the BBC and other broadcast and 'mainstream' media', later including [and in particular] the Mail on sunday decided to go into a subcontract with her ina miniature joint venture....
They were capitalising on the very tenuous and threadbare [in the context of society, politics, democracy and accountability] links that Lauren had with the Tony Blair regime just installed.
For ALL the past 11 years since Lauren Booth was mounted on the mainstream media abased on the alleged ‘half’ sibling relations with Cherie Blair,. lauren Booth had not made any contribution that objective commentators or observers of the ‘pair in power’ had not made.
In fact Lauren’s surfacing on the media has been measurable by the height or the level of media presence that has been attached to Cherie Booth ‘Blair’ over the years....
All the while, Lauren Booth has been allowed the media spots - and the not insignificant cash that has been placed into her direction including in the direction of her ‘place’ in ‘France’ on the most tenuous of evidential grounds.
This latest appearance today [Saturday 17 May 2008] when she talked to the BBC News Breakfast programme, was the most embarrassing. And inappropriate. She is evidently of the wrong view that Cherie Blair is ‘working class’, that she had not had much material possessions as a could etc....
And so she feels that on 17 May 2008, almost a year after Cherie had left the ‘official address’ of ‘Britain’s Prime Minister’ and two days after she was told [by another, sitting, ‘judge’] to resign as a ‘judge’ because she was bringing the ‘legal profession’ into disrepute by her ‘vulgar, obscene indulgences’ in publishing the most private of details about herself [so disgusting the spread of the public that even someone so lowly-esteemed in public as Graham Norton, was able to claim a ‘higher’ ground [in ‘taste’ if not in morality necessarily] as compared to Cherie Blair, as Norton showed on BBC TV on Friday night 16 May 2008].
[To be continued]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the 'Crossrail Bill' [a Bill in UK Parliament]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SGqe5VQwLHI/AAAAAAAABfc/MEjjMWby2dc/S226/Khoodeelaar!+try+this+logo.gif)
![London [Rupert Murdoched] Times, Wed. 7 May 2008](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitiFRN6uO_MOdYMby0s7ow2zcBaewOKfl3k4QdCPcahu1IKXx6sl7Gs4aO9VrAhN8gQJvYb1a2JnODsTUsMks_LtoZVuqc64whMkMitNKVz1bijPST853uNwRNG8x2PVFl1kqRez8M3b-j/s226/1676149.jpg)
