Thursday, August 7, 2008

AADHIKARonline: This page was last edited at 0620 GMT Fri 08.08.2008

KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law action against "CROSSRAIL hole plot-couriers" programme update: [5] 7 August 2008

This page was last edited at 2010 GMT London Thursday 7 August 2008

KHOODEELAAR! evidence of representation TO CROSSRAIL company CLRL of the community opposition to the Crossrail hole plot - on behalf of the tenants, residents and occupiers of the premises and homes in the Whitechapel area streets concerned:

In the TEN months that have passed, no acknowledgement from Crossrail has been received. No reply has either been received. It is to be noted for the purpose of evidence that the -e-mail was sent to the GENERAL Crossrail e-mail address. Which means that ANY responsible employee would have had access to the inbox and they should have dealt with the e-mail. Except that Crossrail company DECIDED against acknowledging the communication.

By failing to BOTH acknowledge RECEIPT AND REPLY TO THE COMMUNICATION< the CLRL company again showed their defiance to the constitutional and legal duty to answer questions about the effects of the CRASSrail hole plan on the community.

This instance shows that the CLRL company behaved crassly. As it has been on the overwhelming number of occasions in the context.

THIS IS INCLUDED IN THE KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law acton evidence:




"TO Tom Mantey re 'Wodeham Gardens, Castlemain Street, Lomas St and Trahorn Close'- 1
Monday, September 17, 2007 1:56 PM
From:
"ConstitutionalandLegal Auditcommunication"
To:
helpdesk@crossrail.co.uk
Cc:
lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk, bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk

FAO Tom Mantey re 'Wodeham Gardens, Castlemain Street,
Lomas St and Trahorn Close'- 1

This is a communication being conducted on behalf of
KHOODEELAAR! and in relation to the above streets.

We are authorised by the residents - as confirmed at
the two public meetings held of residents and ca,campaigners
against Crossrail hole plan -  to ask you the
relevant questions.

What legal authority do you have to propose to do what
your letter says you are going to do in the area?

Please send your response by return as this is very
urgent .
Yours faithfully
Law unit
Khoodeelaar!
1355 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 17 September 2007

KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law action against "CROSSRAIL hole plot-couriers" programme update: [5] 7 August 2008

This page was last edited at 2005 Hrs GMT London Thursday 7 August 2008

KHOODEELAAR! evidence of representation TO CROSSRAIL company CLRL of the community opposition to the Crossrail hole plot - on behalf of the tenants, residents and occupiers of the premises and homes in the Whitechapel area streets concerned:

In the TEN months that have passed, no acknowledgement from Crossrail has been received. No reply has either been received. It is to be noted for the purpose of evidence that the -e-mail was sent to the GENERAL Crossrail e-mail address. Which means that ANY responsible employee would have had access to the inbox and they should have dealt with the e-mail. Except that Crossrail company DECIDED against acknowledging the communication.

By failing to BOTH acknowledge RECEIPT AND REPLY TO THE COMMUNICATION< the CLRL company again showed their defiance to the constitutional and legal duty to answer questions about the effects of the CRASSrail hole pan on the community.

This instance shows that the CLRL company behaved crassly. As it has been on the overwhelming number of occasions in the context.

THIS IS INCLUDED IN THE KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law acton evidence:




"TO Tom Mantey re 'Wodeham Gardens, Castlemain Street, Lomas St and Trahorn Close'- 1
Monday, September 17, 2007 1:56 PM
From:
"ConstitutionalandLegal Auditcommunication"
To:
helpdesk@crossrail.co.uk
Cc:
lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk, bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk

FAO Tom Mantey re 'Wodeham Gardens, Castlemain Street,
Lomas St and Trahorn Close'- 1

This is a communication being conducted on behalf of
KHOODEELAAR! and in relation to the above streets.

We are authorised by the residents - as confirmed at
the two public meetings held of residents and ca,campaigners
against Crossrail hole plan -  to ask you the
relevant questions.

What legal authority do you have to propose to do what
your letter says you are going to do in the area?

Please send your response by return as this is very
urgent .
Yours faithfully
Law unit
Khoodeelaar!
1355 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 17 September 2007