By©Muhammad Haque
1605 Hrs GMT
London Sunday 27 July 2008
It was Harriet Harman, none other than the Heartless one herself, who boasted less than a fortnight ago that the 'House', the Commons that is, would not 'rise' [that is, would not sit down=would not go on the two month long holiday!] until the speaker had confirmed that 'Royal Assent' had been given to the 'Crossrail Bill'!
And why was Harriet wrong to make that statement?
Answer: Because she was behaving there like an insensitive, irresponsive, uncaring, unheeding, unaccountable, irresponsible member of a legislature.... and that she was taking part in the breaking of the constitution........ because she knew that the Crossrail Bill was being allowed through without complying with the due procedures and the processes of constitutionality that the Crossrail Bill was a pack of lies... that it was a product of and linked closely with undemocratic, unaccountable and identified by name forces of greed that in fact plotted to pocket £billions of public money under the cover of Crossrail.....that her pretentious pronouncements in paraded protestations all day throughout the day today Sunday 27 July 2008 are untrue. Untruthful. And unfounded on fact. She voted for the Crossrail Bill all the way. She never even paused to ask if the people in the East End of London or indeed in the centre of the Mayfair area in west London had had our objections heard by Parliament. Harriet Harman is a known failure as a minister. She lost the job as Blair’s first cabinet minister in control of the Social Security Department [=DSS] [=now = DWP] . She did not get to grips with the subject. She in fact allowed the starving of hundreds of thousands of people..... She knew that she was responsible for the people being forced into starvation for no reason.... Was that economic? What economics does Harriet Harman understand? What evidence has she ever shown of the legality, the ECONOMIC justification for casting hundreds of thousands of people into poverty in Britain? That was in 1997-1998... Ten years on , she has the gall to utter today, ten years on from her terrible role at the DSS in 1997-1998 about ‘an economic problem’! Does she mean ONE economic problem? Or does she mean a problem that is economic? With harriet harman, there is no telling whether she is speaking with knowledge or whether she is appearing with a scripted utterance just to put a gloss on a devastating state of affairs...... Is that state anything to do with lack of respect fro people? With Harriet, definitely not. Harriet Harman’s achievement is that as a token, she has achieved herself a corner in the book of records. But she has done so at the expense of the rights of hundreds of thousands of families. She has sacrificed the human rights and violated the dignity of millions of individuals. at And shed has neglected the needs of similar numbers of children... Today, Sunday 27 July 2008, Harriet Harman has been speaking about her awareness of peoples’ struggle;e in making ends meet! She is in fact being sued by Gordon Brown as his voice today...How dare Harriet Harman talk about peoples’ hardship and refer to peoples’ struggles with making ends meet? She is the problem. She is the symbolic problem and she is also the constitutional problem... shall expose Harriet Harman’s hollowness in detail in this series of comments... One key problem that has forced so many people into the struggling position is the lack of honour in the actions and the utterances of the Govt to which Harriet belongs and off which Harriet takes the obvious 'satisfaction'....Personally, she is doing well in her career But she is doing so by sinking so many peoples’ hopes and rights..... She is the one that has been now plugging for the Big Business agenda Govt...She is the one that said that the House will ‘not rise’ until the Crossrail hoe plot was given the status of law on the last day of the current session....She showed contempt when she toured Tower Hamlets DURING THE RUN up to the 1 May 2008 ‘by-elections’ and the GLA , ‘mayor, ‘in the name of London’ elections, making photo appearances in the East Lon don Borough with suitably stooged ‘Blaired machine zombie faces and assorted tokens’ programmed to promote the agenda that she has been backing... That agenda is one of backing Big Business and of riding roughshod over communities like the people affected by the Crossrail hole plot in the area.... She has shown nothing but contempt for the people who have stated so many serious objections and have pointed out so many errors, mistakes and wrongs in the Crossrail package.... She has chosen, instead, to be pals with Oona King, who had insulted people in the community and from the East End of London in 2004-2005 when they tried to talk some sense into Oona King [still ‘MP’ in the name of the people in the parliamentary constituency of Bethnal Green and Bow] and who tried to get her [‘Oona King’ ] to speak against Crossrail hole plot... Oona King did not speak against the Crossrail hole plot. Politically, democratically and electorally she was given due and clear and unmistakable warning that her refusals to show respect to the people of the East End and her refusal and failure to represent the community’s opposition to the Crossrail hole scam, Crossrail hole plot would not be forgotten. People remembered Oona King’s behaviour when the time came in may 2005... By her failures to tell the truth against Crossrail, by her refusal to tell the truth about the campaign in the community against the Crossrail, hole Big Business agenda, Oona King showed that she was not suited to being an MP. Not especially to being an MP that showed respect to the constituency. Especially not in a constituency like the Bethnal Green and Bow .... To this day, Oona King has not stated any opposition to Crossrail hole agenda She has made money by referring to the campaign. That alleged confirmation by Tony McNulty, Crossrail hole plot minister at the time, that Oona king had been STUPID by letting him walk into a meeting where anti-Crossrail hole plot people were present, is still full of questions... It RAISES questions. Much more than it answers.... Why? Because Oona King herself AGREED with the things that McNulty was up to at that time in his de facto role as the plugger of the Big Business scam that was later to become known as the “Crossrail Bill’.... So if Oona King had herself DISAGREED with McNulty on Crossrail and if she had disagreed with Crossrail scam itself then she would have stated that opposition somewhere after referring to McNulty calling her STUPID...........Without acknowledging the campaign against Crossrail hole plot in any honest ethical dignified or democratic way, Oona King has maintained her own alienation from the truth. And from the reality of the community........
Sunday, July 27, 2008
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! legal questions to Boris Johnson ALSO expose the sham Crossrail legislation process at Westminster just ‘stooged through the motion’!
KHOODEELAAR! LAW UNIT to Boris Johnson by E-MAIL at 1230 Hrs UK 22 July 2008
These [in two parts] [This is part 2 of 2] are the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole questions that Boris Johnson must answer today about Crossrail
What is the evidence for saying that Crossrail is crucial to the London economy?
What is the evidence for saying that Crossrail will bring benefits to the East End of Lon don?
What does ‘benefits’ in this context refer to in ordinary language? Does it relate to human, economic social, societal productive capacities that are not obtainable or available in any other way in London’s East End or via or from or through the existing transport facilities, links and infrastructure except by there being a rail line called [or like the one devised as] Crossrail?
If so what is that evidence?
Where is that evidence?
And if that evidence exists, how long has that existed?
And who created the analytical identify of that evidence?
Who did any research, investigation and where and over what time and in what field and with what materials and subjects and under what criteria and parameters and commission and authority?
What is any evidence that says that Crossrail is vital for London’s world class status? What exactly foes that phrase refer to and on what basis in terms of the day to day experience in London today and in the recent past?
What legal, evidential, constitutional and democratic reason is there, if any, for there being no answer to the hundreds of KHOODEELAAR! questions concerning and covering all the main aspects of the whole CROSSRAIL scam and as put in the past years to the office you now hold?
Ends part 2 of the updated Question to Boris Johnson
1200 GMT
1300 UKTime
London
Tuesday 22 July 2008
2nd part follows in a few minutes
These [in two parts] [This is part 2 of 2] are the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole questions that Boris Johnson must answer today about Crossrail
What is the evidence for saying that Crossrail is crucial to the London economy?
What is the evidence for saying that Crossrail will bring benefits to the East End of Lon don?
What does ‘benefits’ in this context refer to in ordinary language? Does it relate to human, economic social, societal productive capacities that are not obtainable or available in any other way in London’s East End or via or from or through the existing transport facilities, links and infrastructure except by there being a rail line called [or like the one devised as] Crossrail?
If so what is that evidence?
Where is that evidence?
And if that evidence exists, how long has that existed?
And who created the analytical identify of that evidence?
Who did any research, investigation and where and over what time and in what field and with what materials and subjects and under what criteria and parameters and commission and authority?
What is any evidence that says that Crossrail is vital for London’s world class status? What exactly foes that phrase refer to and on what basis in terms of the day to day experience in London today and in the recent past?
What legal, evidential, constitutional and democratic reason is there, if any, for there being no answer to the hundreds of KHOODEELAAR! questions concerning and covering all the main aspects of the whole CROSSRAIL scam and as put in the past years to the office you now hold?
Ends part 2 of the updated Question to Boris Johnson
1200 GMT
1300 UKTime
London
Tuesday 22 July 2008
2nd part follows in a few minutes
KHOODEELAAR! demands Boris Johnson must fully face up to on Crossrail hole plot waste
KHOODEELAAR! LAW UNIT to Boris Johnson by E-MAIL at 1230 Hrs UK 22 July 2008
These [in two parts] are the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole questions that Boris Johnson must answer today about Crossrail
1. What admissible and accessible and publicly available as at today Tuesday 22 July 2008 evidence is there that shows that the transport needs of London are primarily about there being a Crossrail?
2. What reasonable ground is there for Gordon Brown's ignoring the advice of Rod Eddington [see Channel 4 news, October 2007] and making that transparently election-linked stunt announcement of the commitment of £Billions of public money to Crossrail?
3. What correlative evidence is there for the promotion of the Crossrail scam as ‘bringing benefits’ to ANY ordinary part of London communities as OPPOSED to Crossrail being used as a propaganda, and a marketing hype and reference tool to enhance the unsubstantiated i image of what the promoters consider to be Britain?
4. What is the evidence in any reasonable sense that shows that the lies which Ken Livingstone admitted as having perpetrated to get the 2012 Olympic Games hosting to London on the BBC TV Question Time programme [in which Boris Johnson himself took part in the last week of April 2008] were acceptable?
5. What ground is there for any lies to be accepted ?
6. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the low income groups of people in London have the demand, expressed the demand or have agreed to the demand by their economic conduct or the capacity to support the extra costs of funding Crossrail?
7. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the ordinary people who use or need to use transport in London have given any preference to the public money and the council tax payers'’ money being wasted in the way that Crossrail entails?
8. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of Lon d’ conducted that shows the full range in accessible way of the existing transport infrastructure in London as compared to the full implications and ramifications of the Crossrail hole scam?
Ends part 1 of the updated Question to Boris Johnson
1130 GMT
1230 UKTime
London
Tuesday 22 July 2008
2nd part follows in a few minutes
These [in two parts] are the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole questions that Boris Johnson must answer today about Crossrail
1. What admissible and accessible and publicly available as at today Tuesday 22 July 2008 evidence is there that shows that the transport needs of London are primarily about there being a Crossrail?
2. What reasonable ground is there for Gordon Brown's ignoring the advice of Rod Eddington [see Channel 4 news, October 2007] and making that transparently election-linked stunt announcement of the commitment of £Billions of public money to Crossrail?
3. What correlative evidence is there for the promotion of the Crossrail scam as ‘bringing benefits’ to ANY ordinary part of London communities as OPPOSED to Crossrail being used as a propaganda, and a marketing hype and reference tool to enhance the unsubstantiated i image of what the promoters consider to be Britain?
4. What is the evidence in any reasonable sense that shows that the lies which Ken Livingstone admitted as having perpetrated to get the 2012 Olympic Games hosting to London on the BBC TV Question Time programme [in which Boris Johnson himself took part in the last week of April 2008] were acceptable?
5. What ground is there for any lies to be accepted ?
6. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the low income groups of people in London have the demand, expressed the demand or have agreed to the demand by their economic conduct or the capacity to support the extra costs of funding Crossrail?
7. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the ordinary people who use or need to use transport in London have given any preference to the public money and the council tax payers'’ money being wasted in the way that Crossrail entails?
8. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of Lon d’ conducted that shows the full range in accessible way of the existing transport infrastructure in London as compared to the full implications and ramifications of the Crossrail hole scam?
Ends part 1 of the updated Question to Boris Johnson
1130 GMT
1230 UKTime
London
Tuesday 22 July 2008
2nd part follows in a few minutes
KHOODEELAAR! demands Boris Johnson must fully face up to on Crossrail hole plot waste
KHOODEELAAR! LAW UNIT to Boris Johnson by E-MAIL at 1230 Hrs UK 22 July 2008
These [in two parts] are the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole questions that Boris Johnson must answer today about Crossrail
1. What admissible and accessible and publicly available as at today Tuesday 22 July 2008 evidence is there that shows that the transport needs of London are primarily about there being a Crossrail?
2. What reasonable ground is there for Gordon Brown's ignoring the advice of Rod Eddington [see Channel 4 news, October 2007] and making that transparently election-linked stunt announcement of the commitment of £Billions of public money to Crossrail?
3. What correlative evidence is there for the promotion of the Crossrail scam as ‘bringing benefits’ to ANY ordinary part of London communities as OPPOSED to Crossrail being used as a propaganda, and a marketing hype and reference tool to enhance the unsubstantiated i image of what the promoters consider to be Britain?
4. What is the evidence in any reasonable sense that shows that the lies which Ken Livingstone admitted as having perpetrated to get the 2012 Olympic Games hosting to London on the BBC TV Question Time programme [in which Boris Johnson himself took part in the last week of April 2008] were acceptable?
5. What ground is there for any lies to be accepted ?
6. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the low income groups of people in London have the demand, expressed the demand or have agreed to the demand by their economic conduct or the capacity to support the extra costs of funding Crossrail?
7. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the ordinary people who use or need to use transport in London have given any preference to the public money and the council tax payers'’ money being wasted in the way that Crossrail entails?
8. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of Lon d’ conducted that shows the full range in accessible way of the existing transport infrastructure in London as compared to the full implications and ramifications of the Crossrail hole scam?
Ends part 1 of the updated Question to Boris Johnson
1130 GMT
1230 UKTime
London
Tuesday 22 July 2008
2nd part follows in a few minutes
These [in two parts] are the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole questions that Boris Johnson must answer today about Crossrail
1. What admissible and accessible and publicly available as at today Tuesday 22 July 2008 evidence is there that shows that the transport needs of London are primarily about there being a Crossrail?
2. What reasonable ground is there for Gordon Brown's ignoring the advice of Rod Eddington [see Channel 4 news, October 2007] and making that transparently election-linked stunt announcement of the commitment of £Billions of public money to Crossrail?
3. What correlative evidence is there for the promotion of the Crossrail scam as ‘bringing benefits’ to ANY ordinary part of London communities as OPPOSED to Crossrail being used as a propaganda, and a marketing hype and reference tool to enhance the unsubstantiated i image of what the promoters consider to be Britain?
4. What is the evidence in any reasonable sense that shows that the lies which Ken Livingstone admitted as having perpetrated to get the 2012 Olympic Games hosting to London on the BBC TV Question Time programme [in which Boris Johnson himself took part in the last week of April 2008] were acceptable?
5. What ground is there for any lies to be accepted ?
6. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the low income groups of people in London have the demand, expressed the demand or have agreed to the demand by their economic conduct or the capacity to support the extra costs of funding Crossrail?
7. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of London’ conducted that shows that the ordinary people who use or need to use transport in London have given any preference to the public money and the council tax payers'’ money being wasted in the way that Crossrail entails?
8. What study or studies has the GLA or the ‘mayor in the name of Lon d’ conducted that shows the full range in accessible way of the existing transport infrastructure in London as compared to the full implications and ramifications of the Crossrail hole scam?
Ends part 1 of the updated Question to Boris Johnson
1130 GMT
1230 UKTime
London
Tuesday 22 July 2008
2nd part follows in a few minutes
Khoodeelaar! final notice before court proceedings, sent to Boris Johnson: DON"T Endorse Crossrail scam!
Dear Mr Johnson
This is further to our previous memos, questions, notices as served on the holder of the post of mayor of London on the matter of the 'Crossrail hole scam' as contained in and represented by the 'Crossrail Bill' which Harriet Harman has said would be conveyed as having been given the Royal assent today.
We are sending this to confirm that as soon as the existing UK domestic court procedures permit, we shall be filing applications to the High court against ALL those who have been in power to promote the Crossrail Bill and the scam. That includes the holder of the office of mayor in the name of London.
That means yourself.
We are therefore asking you to delay any repeat by ‘the mayor’ in the name of London of any fanatical, enthusiastic [including and implying exaggerated, unsubstantiated...] endorsement OF THE CROSSRAIL BILL [or ‘Crossrail Act’] UNTIL AFTER YOU HAVE READ AND RESPONDED TO OUR LATEST LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW QUESTIONS. Those questions are being prepared now and will be sent to you by 1400 Hrs UK time today.
Should you decide to ignore this and go ahead anyway in making the endorsing comment etc. we shall treat such action as being conclusive confirmation of your position. That position will warrant our treating you as the SECOND defendant in any court action.
We are asking you to DELAY ANY agreement with the DfT or any other party peddling the Crassrail scam until you have fully considered our objections and responded to us in full on our evidence and have fully responded to us within the law and within the constitution. By ‘the constitution’ we mean and also include the UK’s treaty obligations and draw your attention, as a brief pointer in this short updater communication, to the Factortame cases and THEIR relevance to the UK’s law-making conduct and the implications thereof. Other cases and precedents shall be cited in due course. BOTH the EU and the ECHR shall be invoked. Domestically [in domestic UK judicial contexts] , we shall be invoking all the anti-discriminatory legislation as well.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely
KHOODEELAAR! LAW Unit
Postal service address:
1120 Hrs UK
1020 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 22 July 2008
This is further to our previous memos, questions, notices as served on the holder of the post of mayor of London on the matter of the 'Crossrail hole scam' as contained in and represented by the 'Crossrail Bill' which Harriet Harman has said would be conveyed as having been given the Royal assent today.
We are sending this to confirm that as soon as the existing UK domestic court procedures permit, we shall be filing applications to the High court against ALL those who have been in power to promote the Crossrail Bill and the scam. That includes the holder of the office of mayor in the name of London.
That means yourself.
We are therefore asking you to delay any repeat by ‘the mayor’ in the name of London of any fanatical, enthusiastic [including and implying exaggerated, unsubstantiated...] endorsement OF THE CROSSRAIL BILL [or ‘Crossrail Act’] UNTIL AFTER YOU HAVE READ AND RESPONDED TO OUR LATEST LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW QUESTIONS. Those questions are being prepared now and will be sent to you by 1400 Hrs UK time today.
Should you decide to ignore this and go ahead anyway in making the endorsing comment etc. we shall treat such action as being conclusive confirmation of your position. That position will warrant our treating you as the SECOND defendant in any court action.
We are asking you to DELAY ANY agreement with the DfT or any other party peddling the Crassrail scam until you have fully considered our objections and responded to us in full on our evidence and have fully responded to us within the law and within the constitution. By ‘the constitution’ we mean and also include the UK’s treaty obligations and draw your attention, as a brief pointer in this short updater communication, to the Factortame cases and THEIR relevance to the UK’s law-making conduct and the implications thereof. Other cases and precedents shall be cited in due course. BOTH the EU and the ECHR shall be invoked. Domestically [in domestic UK judicial contexts] , we shall be invoking all the anti-discriminatory legislation as well.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely
KHOODEELAAR! LAW Unit
Postal service address:
1120 Hrs UK
1020 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 22 July 2008
Khoodeelaar! final notice before court proceedings, sent to Boris Johnson: DON"T Endorse Crossrail scam!
Dear Mr Johnson
This is further to our previous memos, questions, notices as served on the holder of the post of mayor of London on the matter of the 'Crossrail hole scam' as contained in and represented by the 'Crossrail Bill' which Harriet Harman has said would be conveyed as having been given the Royal assent today.
We are sending this to confirm that as soon as the existing UK domestic court procedures permit, we shall be filing applications to the High court against ALL those who have been in power to promote the Crossrail Bill and the scam. That includes the holder of the office of mayor in the name of London.
That means yourself.
We are therefore asking you to delay any repeat by ‘the mayor’ in the name of London of any fanatical, enthusiastic [including and implying exaggerated, unsubstantiated...] endorsement OF THE CROSSRAIL BILL [or ‘Crossrail Act’] UNTIL AFTER YOU HAVE READ AND RESPONDED TO OUR LATEST LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW QUESTIONS. Those questions are being prepared now and will be sent to you by 1400 Hrs UK time today.
Should you decide to ignore this and go ahead anyway in making the endorsing comment etc. we shall treat such action as being conclusive confirmation of your position. That position will warrant our treating you as the SECOND defendant in any court action.
We are asking you to DELAY ANY agreement with the DfT or any other party peddling the Crassrail scam until you have fully considered our objections and responded to us in full on our evidence and have fully responded to us within the law and within the constitution. By ‘the constitution’ we mean and also include the UK’s treaty obligations and draw your attention, as a brief pointer in this short updater communication, to the Factortame cases and THEIR relevance to the UK’s law-making conduct and the implications thereof. Other cases and precedents shall be cited in due course. BOTH the EU and the ECHR shall be invoked. Domestically [in domestic UK judicial contexts] , we shall be invoking all the anti-discriminatory legislation as well.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely
KHOODEELAAR! LAW Unit
Postal service address:
1120 Hrs UK
1020 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 22 July 2008
This is further to our previous memos, questions, notices as served on the holder of the post of mayor of London on the matter of the 'Crossrail hole scam' as contained in and represented by the 'Crossrail Bill' which Harriet Harman has said would be conveyed as having been given the Royal assent today.
We are sending this to confirm that as soon as the existing UK domestic court procedures permit, we shall be filing applications to the High court against ALL those who have been in power to promote the Crossrail Bill and the scam. That includes the holder of the office of mayor in the name of London.
That means yourself.
We are therefore asking you to delay any repeat by ‘the mayor’ in the name of London of any fanatical, enthusiastic [including and implying exaggerated, unsubstantiated...] endorsement OF THE CROSSRAIL BILL [or ‘Crossrail Act’] UNTIL AFTER YOU HAVE READ AND RESPONDED TO OUR LATEST LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW QUESTIONS. Those questions are being prepared now and will be sent to you by 1400 Hrs UK time today.
Should you decide to ignore this and go ahead anyway in making the endorsing comment etc. we shall treat such action as being conclusive confirmation of your position. That position will warrant our treating you as the SECOND defendant in any court action.
We are asking you to DELAY ANY agreement with the DfT or any other party peddling the Crassrail scam until you have fully considered our objections and responded to us in full on our evidence and have fully responded to us within the law and within the constitution. By ‘the constitution’ we mean and also include the UK’s treaty obligations and draw your attention, as a brief pointer in this short updater communication, to the Factortame cases and THEIR relevance to the UK’s law-making conduct and the implications thereof. Other cases and precedents shall be cited in due course. BOTH the EU and the ECHR shall be invoked. Domestically [in domestic UK judicial contexts] , we shall be invoking all the anti-discriminatory legislation as well.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely
KHOODEELAAR! LAW Unit
Postal service address:
1120 Hrs UK
1020 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 22 July 2008
Sunday, July 20, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law claims against Alistair Darling over poverty-creating London Crossrail hole scam
This page of AADHIKARonline was last edited at 0815 GMT Sunday 20 july 2008
Constitutional law commentary and update by©Muhammad Haque
0815 Hrs GMT
LOndon Sunday 20 July 2008
COMING HERE in the next hours, including the following:-
1. How Tower Hamlets Council CROSSRAIL hole plot and agenda -inviting clique makes the East End borough poor and keeps poverty going AS POLICY as well as CULTURE
2. The full list of claims against Alistair Darling [who will be co-defendant with amongst other Ruth kelly and Douglas Alexander] as the claims are being filed in court after next Tuesday's Crossrail hole plot 'Royal Assent'
3. The list of allegations against the London Assembly and the Tfl [Transport for London] and DFT ][Department for Transport] on Crossrail hole plot
4. The list of allegations against the bureaucracies involved in the Crossrail Bill select committees in the UK House of Commons and the UK "legislative' House of Lords
5. Other legal, evidential items
[To be continued]
Constitutional law commentary and update by©Muhammad Haque
0815 Hrs GMT
LOndon Sunday 20 July 2008
COMING HERE in the next hours, including the following:-
1. How Tower Hamlets Council CROSSRAIL hole plot and agenda -inviting clique makes the East End borough poor and keeps poverty going AS POLICY as well as CULTURE
2. The full list of claims against Alistair Darling [who will be co-defendant with amongst other Ruth kelly and Douglas Alexander] as the claims are being filed in court after next Tuesday's Crossrail hole plot 'Royal Assent'
3. The list of allegations against the London Assembly and the Tfl [Transport for London] and DFT ][Department for Transport] on Crossrail hole plot
4. The list of allegations against the bureaucracies involved in the Crossrail Bill select committees in the UK House of Commons and the UK "legislative' House of Lords
5. Other legal, evidential items
[To be continued]
Saturday, July 19, 2008
As the degenerating, poverty-creating, Big Business Crossrail hole agenda gets MPs rubber stamp on Tuesday, how the media have lied, hidden the truth
By©Muhammad Haque 0435 Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 July 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘Corral hole Big Business agenda’ CAMPAIGN has pointed out for years that the so-called ‘prudent financial journal’ the FT was a platform of corrupt journalism, often misleading the ‘readers’ on the actual economic conditions, trends and the correlated facts, events and plots In the context of the Big Business Crassrail hole plot, the FT has published lies.
Just like the London EVENING Nostandards STANDARD, the FT has published fabricated accounts on the cots, the need and the relevance of the Crassrail hole project. The FT is frequently promoted as having been written by ‘professional journalist’ who are socially aware , in fact even ‘conventionally left wing’. This is another lie. The FT is corrupt. And the record of the FT’s corruption is to be found on its pages [as well as in its so-called special reports published] throughout its existence. The FT and the Guardian have been parts of the so-called mainstream British media triumvirate along with the BBC which has afforded space to the other falsely painted left wing time serving agent of Big Business capitalism, Ken Livingstone. The FT, the Guardian and the BBC have failed to tell the truth on the domestic economic and asocial conditions... Just as Saturday’s ‘journalism’ showed, even the Rupert Murdoch Times did a better piece of financial journalism than the FT did. Or the BBC. Or the Guardian. That interview with the UK Finance minister - and the bringer of the CRASSrail Bill Alistair Darling, would have been the sort of reporting that the FT should have been able to do. The agenda on the FT has never been clear. It is coloured pink but it is also morally very very dubious. The result is that the FT misspeaks ... By peddling the wasteful obsolete and bogus Crossrail scam, the FT is serving the secret ‘constituency’;, the Big Business while failing to report on the transport needs, the economic needs and the capacities. If Gordon Brown or Alistair Darling [whichever is the ‘face’] fails to make the right decisions, then the ‘ atmosphere of public opinion’ in which they do so will have been as much their fault as it will be the fault of the FT, the Guardian and the BBC... The fault being to tell the truth about the economic facts.... and the social and democratic adverse effects of making the wrong economic decisions...
The FT, the Guardian and the BBC have all been pretence-’sympathiser’ with the ‘socially excluded’ but they are as corrupt and as much on the side of the economic and the social degenerators as their more obvious ‘rival’ publications and media are and have been...
The BBC, the FT and the Guardian NEED there to be social disparities... So that they can then practise [as claiming, falsely, to be concerned for social justice which they NEVER are about] their corrupt craft of playing at being ‘sympathetic. Their corruption of society stinks Because they collude with the creators of social deprivation by making the economic disparity.... As they are showing by their wring and unjustified and unjust promotion of Crossrail which will be another big vehicle to apply to widen the social and economic discrimination, bias and disparities in and AGAINST communities and people in inner city areas like in the East End of London... [To be continued]
THIS EDITION was last updated at 0435 GMT London SUNDAY 20 July 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘Corral hole Big Business agenda’ CAMPAIGN has pointed out for years that the so-called ‘prudent financial journal’ the FT was a platform of corrupt journalism, often misleading the ‘readers’ on the actual economic conditions, trends and the correlated facts, events and plots In the context of the Big Business Crassrail hole plot, the FT has published lies.
Just like the London EVENING Nostandards STANDARD, the FT has published fabricated accounts on the cots, the need and the relevance of the Crassrail hole project. The FT is frequently promoted as having been written by ‘professional journalist’ who are socially aware , in fact even ‘conventionally left wing’. This is another lie. The FT is corrupt. And the record of the FT’s corruption is to be found on its pages [as well as in its so-called special reports published] throughout its existence. The FT and the Guardian have been parts of the so-called mainstream British media triumvirate along with the BBC which has afforded space to the other falsely painted left wing time serving agent of Big Business capitalism, Ken Livingstone. The FT, the Guardian and the BBC have failed to tell the truth on the domestic economic and asocial conditions... Just as Saturday’s ‘journalism’ showed, even the Rupert Murdoch Times did a better piece of financial journalism than the FT did. Or the BBC. Or the Guardian. That interview with the UK Finance minister - and the bringer of the CRASSrail Bill Alistair Darling, would have been the sort of reporting that the FT should have been able to do. The agenda on the FT has never been clear. It is coloured pink but it is also morally very very dubious. The result is that the FT misspeaks ... By peddling the wasteful obsolete and bogus Crossrail scam, the FT is serving the secret ‘constituency’;, the Big Business while failing to report on the transport needs, the economic needs and the capacities. If Gordon Brown or Alistair Darling [whichever is the ‘face’] fails to make the right decisions, then the ‘ atmosphere of public opinion’ in which they do so will have been as much their fault as it will be the fault of the FT, the Guardian and the BBC... The fault being to tell the truth about the economic facts.... and the social and democratic adverse effects of making the wrong economic decisions...
The FT, the Guardian and the BBC have all been pretence-’sympathiser’ with the ‘socially excluded’ but they are as corrupt and as much on the side of the economic and the social degenerators as their more obvious ‘rival’ publications and media are and have been...
The BBC, the FT and the Guardian NEED there to be social disparities... So that they can then practise [as claiming, falsely, to be concerned for social justice which they NEVER are about] their corrupt craft of playing at being ‘sympathetic. Their corruption of society stinks Because they collude with the creators of social deprivation by making the economic disparity.... As they are showing by their wring and unjustified and unjust promotion of Crossrail which will be another big vehicle to apply to widen the social and economic discrimination, bias and disparities in and AGAINST communities and people in inner city areas like in the East End of London... [To be continued]
THIS EDITION was last updated at 0435 GMT London SUNDAY 20 July 2008
BBC Radio 4 PM programme has just confessed to the fact that there is an economic mess: Why t won’t the BBC tell the truth on the wasteful Crossrail
THis AADHIKARonline page was last edited at 1635 GMT Saturday 19 July 2008
By©Muhammd Haque
1635 GMT
London saturday 19 July 2008
The Crossrail hole scam-backing BBC Radio 4 PM programme has just confessed the economy is in a mess because of borrowing....
Question is: Why, then, won’t the BBC tell the truth about the AVOIDABLE public sector BORROWING to the tunes of £Billions that the wasteful Crossrail will IMPOSE on the economy and the public?
[To be continued]
By©Muhammd Haque
1635 GMT
London saturday 19 July 2008
The Crossrail hole scam-backing BBC Radio 4 PM programme has just confessed the economy is in a mess because of borrowing....
Question is: Why, then, won’t the BBC tell the truth about the AVOIDABLE public sector BORROWING to the tunes of £Billions that the wasteful Crossrail will IMPOSE on the economy and the public?
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN gives Boris Johnson another timely advice : DO NOT follow Ken Livingstone in squandering £BIllions
THIS AADHIKARonline page was last edited at 1435 GMT Saturday 19 July 2008
By©©Muhammad Haque
1400 Hrs GMT 1500 Hrs UK Time London Saturday 19 July 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! analysis of crassly conceived Crossrail London BIG BUSINESS City o London SCAM is echoed by the Glasgow Herald and their analysts...By©Muhammad Haque 1400 GMT London Saturday 19 July 2008::A [Glasgow] Herald item from 2007 is as relevant in July 2008 about one of the lies that Crossrail hole plot- Big Business agenda-touts uttered as their argument for £Billions of UK public money to be given to BiG Business...
That lie was given especially frenzied coverage by the cRASSLy edited [!!!!] London EVENING NOSTANDARDS Standard when Ken Livingstone added his lying skills and joined the sub-racist campaign against Scotland as a whole. Livingstone the chameleon posed as a fanatic English nationalist, verging on the peripheries of the Dagenham people with whom he picked fights too in his desperate bid to a appear keen to be all pc [‘politically correct’] in all sorts of contradictory ways. Livingstone came unstuck on the Scottish prejudice issue...
But he did cause damage to anti-racist thinking... And why would Livingstone back any racist lie to ‘justify’ a Big Business London Crossrail hole ploy to loot the UK public? Why else than to get ‘votes’ of course !!!!???
But Livingstone reckoned without the Tories... Even by Livingstone's own sub-racist record, the Tories could out-racist Livingstone any time. Or at any election...!!! As he has found out.... For the first time in his really parasitic career of 40 years in de facto public-paid positions in the name of London, Ken Livingstone was actually comprehensively defeated for the first significant time at an election held under ‘normal British conditions’. That is my way of summing up what constitutes the norm for a British election.
Although the perennially perniciously lying Guardian and some of its den of liars’ more s paraders of the cult of Livingstone have refused to accept the result of the 1 May 2008 London Assembly and ‘mayor’ election. Almost reminiscent of the cheer-leading propaganda outfits in regions of the world where democracy even by the normal British conditions, is not allowed, the Guardian newspaper group in London has refused to recognise the 1 May 2008 election results because the voters were seen to have voted for someone other than the incumbent that the lying Guardian preferred....
Livingstone’s resort to sub-racist anti-Scottish desperation was unmistakable in 2007. We have shown at every stage that Crossrail is crass because it is essentially NOT about solving the transport needs of London.... We have said and SHOWN this since 31 January 2004 when the KHOODEELAAR! campaign actually began in the Brick Lane....Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 area....
.In the 55 months since January 2004, we have referred to and shown the evidence of hundreds of other intervening items to substantiate our thesis that Crossrail was CRASSrail. So when Livingstone took refuse in the sub-racist tent and berated the Scots collectively for what he suggested was the Scots’ greed at the expense of the English, any reasonable, honest and competent student of the reality of the UK could see that Livingstone was wrong on every level... and that Livingstone could only have been motivated in his sub-racist attack on the Scots by petty personal careerism and greed for the perils and the ‘power’ of office..... For the purpose of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail hole plot in London, Livingstone's dire sub-racisim too showed that CROSSRAIL, London was crassly conceived. That it had to be 'justified' by inciting sub-racist prejudice against people hundreds of miles away from London, PROVED, AGAIN, that the London Crossrail scam was NOT FOUNDED PRIMARILY on the urgent transport needs of the people of and in London. ........
[To be continued]
By©©Muhammad Haque
1400 Hrs GMT 1500 Hrs UK Time London Saturday 19 July 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! analysis of crassly conceived Crossrail London BIG BUSINESS City o London SCAM is echoed by the Glasgow Herald and their analysts...By©Muhammad Haque 1400 GMT London Saturday 19 July 2008::A [Glasgow] Herald item from 2007 is as relevant in July 2008 about one of the lies that Crossrail hole plot- Big Business agenda-touts uttered as their argument for £Billions of UK public money to be given to BiG Business...
That lie was given especially frenzied coverage by the cRASSLy edited [!!!!] London EVENING NOSTANDARDS Standard when Ken Livingstone added his lying skills and joined the sub-racist campaign against Scotland as a whole. Livingstone the chameleon posed as a fanatic English nationalist, verging on the peripheries of the Dagenham people with whom he picked fights too in his desperate bid to a appear keen to be all pc [‘politically correct’] in all sorts of contradictory ways. Livingstone came unstuck on the Scottish prejudice issue...
But he did cause damage to anti-racist thinking... And why would Livingstone back any racist lie to ‘justify’ a Big Business London Crossrail hole ploy to loot the UK public? Why else than to get ‘votes’ of course !!!!???
But Livingstone reckoned without the Tories... Even by Livingstone's own sub-racist record, the Tories could out-racist Livingstone any time. Or at any election...!!! As he has found out.... For the first time in his really parasitic career of 40 years in de facto public-paid positions in the name of London, Ken Livingstone was actually comprehensively defeated for the first significant time at an election held under ‘normal British conditions’. That is my way of summing up what constitutes the norm for a British election.
Although the perennially perniciously lying Guardian and some of its den of liars’ more s paraders of the cult of Livingstone have refused to accept the result of the 1 May 2008 London Assembly and ‘mayor’ election. Almost reminiscent of the cheer-leading propaganda outfits in regions of the world where democracy even by the normal British conditions, is not allowed, the Guardian newspaper group in London has refused to recognise the 1 May 2008 election results because the voters were seen to have voted for someone other than the incumbent that the lying Guardian preferred....
Livingstone’s resort to sub-racist anti-Scottish desperation was unmistakable in 2007. We have shown at every stage that Crossrail is crass because it is essentially NOT about solving the transport needs of London.... We have said and SHOWN this since 31 January 2004 when the KHOODEELAAR! campaign actually began in the Brick Lane....Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 area....
.In the 55 months since January 2004, we have referred to and shown the evidence of hundreds of other intervening items to substantiate our thesis that Crossrail was CRASSrail. So when Livingstone took refuse in the sub-racist tent and berated the Scots collectively for what he suggested was the Scots’ greed at the expense of the English, any reasonable, honest and competent student of the reality of the UK could see that Livingstone was wrong on every level... and that Livingstone could only have been motivated in his sub-racist attack on the Scots by petty personal careerism and greed for the perils and the ‘power’ of office..... For the purpose of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail hole plot in London, Livingstone's dire sub-racisim too showed that CROSSRAIL, London was crassly conceived. That it had to be 'justified' by inciting sub-racist prejudice against people hundreds of miles away from London, PROVED, AGAIN, that the London Crossrail scam was NOT FOUNDED PRIMARILY on the urgent transport needs of the people of and in London. ........
[To be continued]
Friday, July 18, 2008
his AADHIKARonline page was last edited at 0510 GMT Sat 19.07.2008
This AADHIKARonline Page last edited at 0510 GMT Sat 19.07.2008
KHOODEELAAR! has said for over 55 months now that 'Crossrail' scam was a crassly conceived one.. Do OTHERS agree? Like some STOOGED MPs?
THIS page of AADHIKARonline was last edited at 0430 Hrs GMT Saturday 19 July 2008
YES, they do! Yes! They DO agree that THEY TOO HAVE BEEN CRASS and stupid!
Really?
Answer: Really!
Says who?
Says the BBC!
What BBC?
The 'Parliamentary unit' of the BBC!
What is that?
That is the part of the Brothellising Broadcasting Corruption that carries the proceedings of the stooged Houses of Parliament.
Q: When did the Brothellising Broadcasting Corruption say that some of the stooged MPs themselves admit that they were stooged, crass and stupid?
In an edition of the so-called RECORD that they broadcast in then past 90 minutes. That is, in the early hours of today Saturday 19 July 2008. The BBC have confessed to their own lying and have facilitated two of the CRASSrail hole Bill committee’s members to exhibit their own banality, their stupidity, their ignorance and their crass, crass lack of dignity, self respect as ‘parliamentarians’.
Q: What did they say?
We quote them in the next parts of this commentary here and on associated KHOODEELAAR! web sites and pages in the next few hours, at any rate before 1000 Hrs GMT today Saturday 19 July 2008
[To be continued]
YES, they do! Yes! They DO agree that THEY TOO HAVE BEEN CRASS and stupid!
Really?
Answer: Really!
Says who?
Says the BBC!
What BBC?
The 'Parliamentary unit' of the BBC!
What is that?
That is the part of the Brothellising Broadcasting Corruption that carries the proceedings of the stooged Houses of Parliament.
Q: When did the Brothellising Broadcasting Corruption say that some of the stooged MPs themselves admit that they were stooged, crass and stupid?
In an edition of the so-called RECORD that they broadcast in then past 90 minutes. That is, in the early hours of today Saturday 19 July 2008. The BBC have confessed to their own lying and have facilitated two of the CRASSrail hole Bill committee’s members to exhibit their own banality, their stupidity, their ignorance and their crass, crass lack of dignity, self respect as ‘parliamentarians’.
Q: What did they say?
We quote them in the next parts of this commentary here and on associated KHOODEELAAR! web sites and pages in the next few hours, at any rate before 1000 Hrs GMT today Saturday 19 July 2008
[To be continued]
Crossrail hole assault on the inner city, 'most deprived borough in the country' : NEW updates, next here
This page was last edited at 1830 GMT Friday 18 July 2008
Thursday, July 17, 2008
Crossrail hole plot-peddler Harriet Harman 'greets' the East End of London!
Ths AADHIKAROnline page was last edited at 0530 GMT Friday 18 July 2008
This is the text from the printed version of KHOODEELAAR! published this morning.
A script for Harriet Harman
as written on the evidence of her conduct
By©Muhammad Haque
Friday 18 July 2008
Evening all! It’s Harriet here with the Police guard! I am the country’s soon-to-
be-occupant at No 10 Downing Street. As I sneak and crawl my way... I am
here in a spot very similar to Brick Lane London E1. I am behind the Police
shields, as I prepare to celebrate the Crossrail hole digging Bill, being passed
.. I am here to assure the East End of London that all Crossrail holes, all
digging, all the removals, losses of jobs, losses of shops, streets places, the
noise, the illnesses the disparity be treated as ‘benefits’ to the people who
will be the losers. I am able to show how wonderful it was to hear that your
recent ‘leader’ Denise Jones was playing so many games on poverty in your
wonderfully deprived area. Denise is thrilled whenever she has the chance to
tell people about how fully fledged the poverty-generation in her borough has
been. ‘The most deprived borough in the country’, she has said only last week!
I could almost hear the tangible purr of satisfaction [as the local ‘East London
Advertiser’ enchanted by Denise's’ apparent charms!, would record in their
newly-launched ‘gossip-for-our-friends’ ‘in the local council’ column] that
Denise had in her voice as she made that satisfying utterance! It had a rich mix
of career in the most poor borough ring to it as Denise confirmed her
achievements as a ‘leadership’ councillor!.....
I note that Tower Hamlets Council ‘officers’ too have been in agreement with my Govt. Like me they see
the Crossrail poverty-holes as ‘benefits’ to you poor people....
The poorer you get, the better it is for Denise Jones!
And for the Council officers. I am so
pleased that they are all so well-received [and well-receptioned!] by the
construction company people and the property speculators...
I am so glad that I had this opportunity to communicate to you from where I am... Cheer up now
as you face the holes that my Govt will be digging all over the East One
area....All Together Now : Harriet brings us the Crossrail hole ! the Diversity
hole, the Equality hole, the Liberty hole....
All thanks to Harriet Harman’s
Crossrail hole role!!!!
[To be continued]
This is the text from the printed version of KHOODEELAAR! published this morning.
A script for Harriet Harman
as written on the evidence of her conduct
By©Muhammad Haque
Friday 18 July 2008
Evening all! It’s Harriet here with the Police guard! I am the country’s soon-to-
be-occupant at No 10 Downing Street. As I sneak and crawl my way... I am
here in a spot very similar to Brick Lane London E1. I am behind the Police
shields, as I prepare to celebrate the Crossrail hole digging Bill, being passed
.. I am here to assure the East End of London that all Crossrail holes, all
digging, all the removals, losses of jobs, losses of shops, streets places, the
noise, the illnesses the disparity be treated as ‘benefits’ to the people who
will be the losers. I am able to show how wonderful it was to hear that your
recent ‘leader’ Denise Jones was playing so many games on poverty in your
wonderfully deprived area. Denise is thrilled whenever she has the chance to
tell people about how fully fledged the poverty-generation in her borough has
been. ‘The most deprived borough in the country’, she has said only last week!
I could almost hear the tangible purr of satisfaction [as the local ‘East London
Advertiser’ enchanted by Denise's’ apparent charms!, would record in their
newly-launched ‘gossip-for-our-friends’ ‘in the local council’ column] that
Denise had in her voice as she made that satisfying utterance! It had a rich mix
of career in the most poor borough ring to it as Denise confirmed her
achievements as a ‘leadership’ councillor!.....
I note that Tower Hamlets Council ‘officers’ too have been in agreement with my Govt. Like me they see
the Crossrail poverty-holes as ‘benefits’ to you poor people....
The poorer you get, the better it is for Denise Jones!
And for the Council officers. I am so
pleased that they are all so well-received [and well-receptioned!] by the
construction company people and the property speculators...
I am so glad that I had this opportunity to communicate to you from where I am... Cheer up now
as you face the holes that my Govt will be digging all over the East One
area....All Together Now : Harriet brings us the Crossrail hole ! the Diversity
hole, the Equality hole, the Liberty hole....
All thanks to Harriet Harman’s
Crossrail hole role!!!!
[To be continued]
Crossrail hole plot and agenda-backer Harriet Harman is betraying all the values she relied on to get a career in Govt....[1]
More, here, during Friday 18 July 2008
Muhammad Haque spots a wholly inconsistent hole on Vince Cable's Lib Dems MPs side
Muhammad Haque spots a wholly inconsistent hole on Vince Cable's Lib Dems MPs side ....they are getting into the Crossrail hole of their own making or possibly of temptation under the spell of Big Business lobby active in the Houses of parliament...
[To be continued]
[To be continued]
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! electoral details LATEST ! MP seats in BOTH constituencies will be contested to stop Crossrail hole....
WHAT the KHOODEELAAR! leaflet is saying TODAY Tuesday 15 July 2008:
"
KHOODEELAAR! campaign with the community in the East End of London are going to CHANGE the local Tower Hamlets Council and STOP the ‘re-election’ or election [if new candidates] to the Council of those who support the Crossrail hole attacks agenda against the community in the East End of London....
We are going to do all we lawfully can do to make sure that no-one gets elected to the Council from the affected E1 area who supports the Crossrail hole Big Business agenda. How are we going to do that? One of the ways we are going to do that is by putting forward candidates directly for election to the council on the KHOODEELAAR! manifesto!The other way is by making John Biggs account for his role on the London Assembly. The other way is to make such an intervention in the election in the two Parliamentary seats that no candidate can get elected without a total Opposition to the Crossrail hole agenda of attacks on the East End of London.
We are looking for suitably dedicated, honest and truthful candidates to stand for Parliamentary election from Bethnal Green and Bow and from the Poplar and Limehouse constituencies. And we are preparing for a long haul constitutional law challenges THROUGH the COURTS [the High Court, the House of Lords and the European Courts: note the plural, many courts],challenges against the bureaucracies in BOTH Houses of Parliament..... To seek election as a KHOODEELAAR! candidate or to join the KHOODEELAAR! Electoral Campaign, send your details in an e-mail by 28 July 2008 to
auditpolitics@yahoo.co.uk
"
KHOODEELAAR! campaign with the community in the East End of London are going to CHANGE the local Tower Hamlets Council and STOP the ‘re-election’ or election [if new candidates] to the Council of those who support the Crossrail hole attacks agenda against the community in the East End of London....
We are going to do all we lawfully can do to make sure that no-one gets elected to the Council from the affected E1 area who supports the Crossrail hole Big Business agenda. How are we going to do that? One of the ways we are going to do that is by putting forward candidates directly for election to the council on the KHOODEELAAR! manifesto!The other way is by making John Biggs account for his role on the London Assembly. The other way is to make such an intervention in the election in the two Parliamentary seats that no candidate can get elected without a total Opposition to the Crossrail hole agenda of attacks on the East End of London.
We are looking for suitably dedicated, honest and truthful candidates to stand for Parliamentary election from Bethnal Green and Bow and from the Poplar and Limehouse constituencies. And we are preparing for a long haul constitutional law challenges THROUGH the COURTS [the High Court, the House of Lords and the European Courts: note the plural, many courts],challenges against the bureaucracies in BOTH Houses of Parliament..... To seek election as a KHOODEELAAR! candidate or to join the KHOODEELAAR! Electoral Campaign, send your details in an e-mail by 28 July 2008 to
auditpolitics@yahoo.co.uk
KHOODEELAAR! electoral details LATEST ! How to stop CROSSRAIL hole attacks on the East End of London...
WHAT the KHOODEELAAR! leaflet is saying TODAY Tuesday 15 July 2008:
"
KHOODEELAAR! campaign with the community in the East End of London are going to CHANGE the local Tower Hamlets Council and STOP the ‘re-election’ or election [if new candidates] to the Council of those who support the Crossrail hole attacks agenda against the community in the East End of London....
We are going to do all we lawfully can do to make sure that no-one gets elected to the Council from the affected E1 area who supports the Crossrail hole Big Business agenda. How are we going to do that? One of the ways we are going to do that is by putting forward candidates directly for election to the council on the KHOODEELAAR! manifesto!The other way is by making John Biggs account for his role on the London Assembly. The other way is to make such an intervention in the election in the two Parliamentary seats that no candidate can get elected without a total Opposition to the Crossrail hole agenda of attacks on the East End of London.
We are looking for suitably dedicated, honest and truthful candidates to stand for Parliamentary election from bethnal green and Bow and from the Poplar and Limehouse constituencies. And we are preparing for a long haul constitutional law challenges THROUGH the COURTS [the High Court, the House of Lords and the European Courts: note the plural, many courts],challenges against the bureaucracies in BOTH Houses of Parliament..... To seek election as a KHOODEELAAR! candidate or to join the KHOODEELAAR! Electoral Campaign, send your details in an e-mail by 28 July 2008 to
auditpolitics@yahoo.co.uk
"
KHOODEELAAR! campaign with the community in the East End of London are going to CHANGE the local Tower Hamlets Council and STOP the ‘re-election’ or election [if new candidates] to the Council of those who support the Crossrail hole attacks agenda against the community in the East End of London....
We are going to do all we lawfully can do to make sure that no-one gets elected to the Council from the affected E1 area who supports the Crossrail hole Big Business agenda. How are we going to do that? One of the ways we are going to do that is by putting forward candidates directly for election to the council on the KHOODEELAAR! manifesto!The other way is by making John Biggs account for his role on the London Assembly. The other way is to make such an intervention in the election in the two Parliamentary seats that no candidate can get elected without a total Opposition to the Crossrail hole agenda of attacks on the East End of London.
We are looking for suitably dedicated, honest and truthful candidates to stand for Parliamentary election from bethnal green and Bow and from the Poplar and Limehouse constituencies. And we are preparing for a long haul constitutional law challenges THROUGH the COURTS [the High Court, the House of Lords and the European Courts: note the plural, many courts],challenges against the bureaucracies in BOTH Houses of Parliament..... To seek election as a KHOODEELAAR! candidate or to join the KHOODEELAAR! Electoral Campaign, send your details in an e-mail by 28 July 2008 to
auditpolitics@yahoo.co.uk
Monday, July 14, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! electoral challenges in Tower Hamlets seats - next update due here at 0001 GMT Tuesday 15 July 2008
KHOODEELAAR! electoral challenges in Tower Hamlets seats - next update due here at 0001 GMT Tuesday 15 July 2008
Crossrail hole plot agenda-promoting decision by Brown was wrong. As is his latest utterance
Crossrail hole plot agenda-promoting decision by Brown was wrong. As is his latest utterance... Before examining Brown’s utterances on the widespread incidents of mainly young people killing other young people across Britain and London, let us take another updated look at how wrong Gordon Brown can be... And then I shall detail,. why Brown should stop taking part in spin and lies.... And why he should start looking at the evidence of those in publicly paid for positions....posts and platforms
By©Muhammad Haque
1810 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 July 2008
When KHOODEELAAR! advised Gordon Brown in early 2004 that he should have nothing whatever to do with the then [yet to be a hybrid Bill-ed] Crassrail scam, we had done so on accurate information we had gathered about the UK Finance ministry's attitude towards the scheme. We had found out that Brown was not supportive of Crossrail because it was not economically justified.
We ourselves have said - and demonstrated the evidence supporting what we have said - all along that the uneconomic nature of the CRASSrail scam is one of its major minus points.
So when we learnt that Brown too was thinking the same way as we had been doing, we treated Brown with a different approach. we did not call him a crass chancellor. Far less an imprudent one. For the evidence available to us in 2004 was that Brown was doing what we would have wanted him to do: say No to CRASSrail.
That line from the UK’s Ministry of Finance [the ‘Treasury’] in effect continued upto even this time last year.
A year ago, in July 2007, the second ‘most influential treasury man’ [in effect the UK’s then deputy Finance minister] as they promoted Ed Balls, was giving out hints and noises that Crossrail would have to be supported otherwise than by public funding,...
That showed that Brown was still not backing Crossrail.
For Ed Balls was nothing if not an echo of Gordon Brown at the Treasury then.
On that evidence, we were logically and evidentially totally opposed to Brown’s NEXT act. That of making utterances just like those ignorant, dishonest and corrupt touts for Big Business had sounded for the years between say February 2004 and June 2007.
Brown was coming across as a fanatical believer in a cult of CROSSRAIL!
He was saying things that the corrupt lobby and City of London elements alone had been saying for the previous 18 months or so.
There was no prudence. No evidence for the new imprudence that Brown was uttering....
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1810 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 July 2008
When KHOODEELAAR! advised Gordon Brown in early 2004 that he should have nothing whatever to do with the then [yet to be a hybrid Bill-ed] Crassrail scam, we had done so on accurate information we had gathered about the UK Finance ministry's attitude towards the scheme. We had found out that Brown was not supportive of Crossrail because it was not economically justified.
We ourselves have said - and demonstrated the evidence supporting what we have said - all along that the uneconomic nature of the CRASSrail scam is one of its major minus points.
So when we learnt that Brown too was thinking the same way as we had been doing, we treated Brown with a different approach. we did not call him a crass chancellor. Far less an imprudent one. For the evidence available to us in 2004 was that Brown was doing what we would have wanted him to do: say No to CRASSrail.
That line from the UK’s Ministry of Finance [the ‘Treasury’] in effect continued upto even this time last year.
A year ago, in July 2007, the second ‘most influential treasury man’ [in effect the UK’s then deputy Finance minister] as they promoted Ed Balls, was giving out hints and noises that Crossrail would have to be supported otherwise than by public funding,...
That showed that Brown was still not backing Crossrail.
For Ed Balls was nothing if not an echo of Gordon Brown at the Treasury then.
On that evidence, we were logically and evidentially totally opposed to Brown’s NEXT act. That of making utterances just like those ignorant, dishonest and corrupt touts for Big Business had sounded for the years between say February 2004 and June 2007.
Brown was coming across as a fanatical believer in a cult of CROSSRAIL!
He was saying things that the corrupt lobby and City of London elements alone had been saying for the previous 18 months or so.
There was no prudence. No evidence for the new imprudence that Brown was uttering....
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! accurately and correctly told Brown to say NO to Crossrail hole plot... We tell him now to say NO to all spin, hype and lies...
Crossrail hole plot agenda-promoting decision by Brown was wrong. As is his latest utterance... Before examining Brown’s utterances on the widespread incidents of mainly young people killing other young people across Britain and London, let us take another updated look at how wrong Gordon Brown can be... And then I shall detail,. why Brown should stop taking part in spin and lies.... And why he should start looking at the evidence of those in publicly paid for positions....posts and platforms
By©Muhammad Haque
1810 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 July 2008
When KHOODEELAAR! advised Gordon Brown in early 2004 that he should have nothing whatever to do with the then [yet to be a hybrid Bill-ed] Crassrail scam, we had done so on accurate information we had gathered about the UK Finance ministry's attitude towards the scheme. We had found out that Brown was not supportive of Crossrail because it was not economically justified.
We ourselves have said - and demonstrated the evidence supporting what we have said - all along that the uneconomic nature of the CRASSrail scam is one of its major minus points.
So when we learnt that Brown too was thinking the same way as we had been doing, we treated Brown with a different approach. we did not call him a crass chancellor. Far less an imprudent one. For the evidence available to us in 2004 was that Brown was doing what we would have wanted him to do: say No to CRASSrail.
That line from the UK’s Ministry of Finance [the ‘Treasury’] in effect continued upto even this time last year.
A year ago, in July 2007, the second ‘most influential treasury man’ [in effect the UK’s then deputy Finance minister] as they promoted Ed Balls, was giving out hints and noises that Crossrail would have to be supported otherwise than by public funding,...
That showed that Brown was still not backing Crossrail.
For Ed Balls was nothing if not an echo of Gordon Brown at the Treasury then.
On that evidence, we were logically and evidentially totally opposed to Brown’s NEXT act. That of making utterances just like those ignorant, dishonest and corrupt touts for Big Business had sounded for the years between say February 2004 and June 2007.
Brown was coming across as a fanatical believer in a cult of CROSSRAIL!
He was saying things that the corrupt lobby and City of London elements alone had been saying for the previous 18 months or so.
There was no prudence. No evidence for the new imprudence that Brown was uttering....
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1810 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 July 2008
When KHOODEELAAR! advised Gordon Brown in early 2004 that he should have nothing whatever to do with the then [yet to be a hybrid Bill-ed] Crassrail scam, we had done so on accurate information we had gathered about the UK Finance ministry's attitude towards the scheme. We had found out that Brown was not supportive of Crossrail because it was not economically justified.
We ourselves have said - and demonstrated the evidence supporting what we have said - all along that the uneconomic nature of the CRASSrail scam is one of its major minus points.
So when we learnt that Brown too was thinking the same way as we had been doing, we treated Brown with a different approach. we did not call him a crass chancellor. Far less an imprudent one. For the evidence available to us in 2004 was that Brown was doing what we would have wanted him to do: say No to CRASSrail.
That line from the UK’s Ministry of Finance [the ‘Treasury’] in effect continued upto even this time last year.
A year ago, in July 2007, the second ‘most influential treasury man’ [in effect the UK’s then deputy Finance minister] as they promoted Ed Balls, was giving out hints and noises that Crossrail would have to be supported otherwise than by public funding,...
That showed that Brown was still not backing Crossrail.
For Ed Balls was nothing if not an echo of Gordon Brown at the Treasury then.
On that evidence, we were logically and evidentially totally opposed to Brown’s NEXT act. That of making utterances just like those ignorant, dishonest and corrupt touts for Big Business had sounded for the years between say February 2004 and June 2007.
Brown was coming across as a fanatical believer in a cult of CROSSRAIL!
He was saying things that the corrupt lobby and City of London elements alone had been saying for the previous 18 months or so.
There was no prudence. No evidence for the new imprudence that Brown was uttering....
[To be continued]
Tribunal finds Tower Hamlets Council guilty of bias against 'older' people..IN EFFECT just as crass as in inviting CROSSRAIL hole attacks...
1630 Hrs GMT London Monday 14 July 2008:KHOODEELAAR! NO to Crassly controlled Crossrail hole-plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council clique: The latest publication by the journal PERSONNEL TODAY points out that Tower Hamlets Council has already gone into denial about the Employment tribunal's finding in the JOHN WOOSTER case... That denial is contained in a report today [Monday 14 July 2008] we have here linked to [see the column next to this] .. KHOODEELAAR! analysis covers aspects that are not confined to just age discrimination We look at the outfit, EastEnd Homes. In context... Eastend Homes is one of the outfits that the corrupt clique on Tower hamlets Council has allowed to be set up. This has been in order to carry out in effect the Margaret Thatcher agenda of dismantling society. Those safeguards and securities and rights that are associated with social or public ownership of services. By attacking those services, those safeties, those rights and legal protection, society-on-the-ground has been weakened in Tower Hamlets. The result, the consequences have been seen in the steady and the mounting deterioration in the quality of life in the Borough... We look at those wider implications... Not confined to the particular case of John Wooster [To be continued]
Sunday, July 13, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! to contest East London parliamentary seats at the next elections, to stop Crossrail hole agenda
KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘Crossrail hole plot-attacks on the East End of London..’ CAMPAIGN to get active in contesting elections in Tower Hamlets MP seats!
Details on the KHOODEELAAR! web site this Sunday lunchtime! at 1200 Hrs GMT today 13 July 2008:
[To be continued]
Details on the KHOODEELAAR! web site this Sunday lunchtime! at 1200 Hrs GMT today 13 July 2008:
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! is set to get active in elections in East London seats, next! To stop Crossrail hole plot against the East End...
0615 GMT 0715 UKTime London Sunday 13 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole plot agenda …..” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! That the Blairing cliques on the London local councils controlled in the name of the former Labour Party by operatives impersonating ‘local councils’ are doing damage to the very local communities in whose name they abuse their positions.What does that abuse mean? For the communities, for individuals, for families in the boroughs affected? And a great deal of disservice, it means bad service. Or no service. How do they do so? How do these get away with misleading the ‘local’ communities? One of the persistent ways that they do it is by ‘taking advantage’ of the absence of active councillors on the same councils. As KHOODEELAAR! has reported for the past 55 months since our campaign against Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London began [on 31 January 2004], the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council has been IN A STATE OF POLITICAL AND DEMOCRATIC MORASS in terms of an ‘elected collection of councillors speaking out for and representing the local community’. That morass is getting even worse by the week… Things are so bad that there is now no ‘official opposition’ on Tower Hamlets Council. Why? Is it because the existing ‘elected councillors’ who belong to allegedly [indeed as alleged!!!] opposition parties all set to ‘defect’ to the controlling ‘grouping’? Not as such. NOT Yet. But there is no opposition. No political opposition… Was that foreseen before the last ‘election’ held in May 2006? KHOODEELAAR! had foreseen that. But the ‘politically active opposition parties who were fielding candidates allegedly against the controlling grouping’ did not want to see the truth. They were also culturally hostile to the idea of a real campaign. They preferred to pretend to be radical, opposition and so on while in fact CRAVING to be in ‘position’…. And the result is that there is no NO POSITION… Politically speaking, democratically speaking, even aesthetically, linguistically, conceptually speaking, there is no POSITION on anything from any alleged opposition… on the Tower Hopeless Council…..Which is why the KHOODEELAAR! campaign is now considering one strategy, that of supporting named candidates at the scheduled council election due next in 2010 …[To be continued]
Saturday, July 12, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! is set to get active in Tower Hamlets Council elections, next! To stop Crossrail hole plot against the East End...
0615 GMT 0715 UKTime London Sunday 13 July 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole plot agenda …..” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO!
That the Blairing cliques on the London local councils controlled in the name of the former Labour Party by operatives impersonating ‘local councils’ are doing damage to the very local communities in whose name they abuse their positions.What does that abuse mean? For the communities, for individuals, for families in the boroughs affected? And a great deal of disservice, it means bad service. Or no service. How do they do so? How do these get away with misleading the ‘local’ communities?
One of the persistent ways that they do it is by ‘taking advantage’ of the absence of active councillors on the same councils.
As KHOODEELAAR! has reported for the past 55 months since our campaign against Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London began [on 31 January 2004], the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council has been IN A STATE OF POLITICAL AND DEMOCRATIC MORASS in terms of an ‘elected collection of councillors speaking out for and representing the local community’. That morass is getting even worse by the week…
Things are so bad that there is now no ‘official opposition’ on Tower Hamlets Council. Why? Is it because the existing ‘elected councillors’ who belong to allegedly [indeed as alleged!!!] opposition parties all set to ‘defect’ to the controlling ‘grouping’? Not as such. NOT Yet. But there is no opposition. No political opposition… Was that foreseen before the last ‘election’ held in May 2006? KHOODEELAAR! had foreseen that. But the ‘politically active opposition parties who were fielding candidates allegedly against the controlling grouping’ did not want to see the truth. They were also culturally hostile to the idea of a real campaign. They preferred to pretend to be radical, opposition and so on while in fact CRAVING to be in ‘position’…. And the result is that there is no NO POSITION… Politically speaking, democratically speaking, even aesthetically, linguistically, conceptually speaking, there is no POSITION on anything from any alleged opposition… on the Tower Hopeless Council…..Which is why the KHOODEELAAR! campaign is now considering one strategy, that of supporting named candidates at the scheduled council election due next in 2010 …[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole plot agenda …..” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO!
That the Blairing cliques on the London local councils controlled in the name of the former Labour Party by operatives impersonating ‘local councils’ are doing damage to the very local communities in whose name they abuse their positions.What does that abuse mean? For the communities, for individuals, for families in the boroughs affected? And a great deal of disservice, it means bad service. Or no service. How do they do so? How do these get away with misleading the ‘local’ communities?
One of the persistent ways that they do it is by ‘taking advantage’ of the absence of active councillors on the same councils.
As KHOODEELAAR! has reported for the past 55 months since our campaign against Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London began [on 31 January 2004], the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council has been IN A STATE OF POLITICAL AND DEMOCRATIC MORASS in terms of an ‘elected collection of councillors speaking out for and representing the local community’. That morass is getting even worse by the week…
Things are so bad that there is now no ‘official opposition’ on Tower Hamlets Council. Why? Is it because the existing ‘elected councillors’ who belong to allegedly [indeed as alleged!!!] opposition parties all set to ‘defect’ to the controlling ‘grouping’? Not as such. NOT Yet. But there is no opposition. No political opposition… Was that foreseen before the last ‘election’ held in May 2006? KHOODEELAAR! had foreseen that. But the ‘politically active opposition parties who were fielding candidates allegedly against the controlling grouping’ did not want to see the truth. They were also culturally hostile to the idea of a real campaign. They preferred to pretend to be radical, opposition and so on while in fact CRAVING to be in ‘position’…. And the result is that there is no NO POSITION… Politically speaking, democratically speaking, even aesthetically, linguistically, conceptually speaking, there is no POSITION on anything from any alleged opposition… on the Tower Hopeless Council…..Which is why the KHOODEELAAR! campaign is now considering one strategy, that of supporting named candidates at the scheduled council election due next in 2010 …[To be continued]
NETWORK RAIL has been caught acting as CHEAT WORK rail! As CHEAT WORK Rail is close to 'Crossrail' pluggers, we say: SCRAP CRASSRAIL!
By©Muhammad Haque
0530 GMT
London Sunday 13 July 2008
NETWORK RAIL is involved with ‘Crossrail'. How has it been behaving? Has it been found to have been as callous and unreliable? INDEED.
As the evidence represented in one scandal that has been found in Islington:
NETWORK is CHEATWORK rail. As NETWORK RAIL AND Islington council ‘planning’ staff have been caught [see the full text of the report from an Islington based publication, we reproduced below] CHEATING the community in Islington, we ask again: how much more evidence of corruption should be found before the failing, wasteful outfits are either disposed of or their ‘contracts’ seriously reviewed and then rescinded and done away with? How much more evidence of Council ‘planners’ behaving against transparency and community rights and good finance before they are given the overdue SACK that they deserve? How much more losses must be allowed to be caused to the local environment, the local economy before CHEATWORK RAIL are given the marching orders and stopped from looting the public while the needs of the community are neglected?
[To be continued]
Islington Tribune - by PETER GRUNER
Published: 11 July 2008
Footbridge study was ‘duplicitous’
A CONTROVERSIAL £60,000 feasibility study into a footbridge that could unite communities on either side of King’s Cross station was already “weighted against the scheme” before it was launched, according to claims this week.
Network Rail ruled out the £5million footbridge last month – promised originally in plans for the railway land redevelopment – on the grounds of costs and security complications.
But campaigners argued this week that the original brief for the study was “unneces sarily complicated”.
Islington Labour councillor Paul Convery, chairman of the west area planning committee, accused Network Rail and Camden planners, who provided the brief for the feasibility study, of being “duplicitous”.
He added: “The planners didn’t look at a simple bridge which would have stretched across the station from one side to another and which is what the residents wanted.
“Instead they looked at a complicated version with access to several platforms. Obviously that would have created a security nightmare and be costly. So the whole scheme was dropped.”
* The scheme will be discussed at a meeting by the King’s Cross Rail Group on Thursday at the Blessed Sacrament Church in Copenhagen Street, Barnsbury, at 7pm.
Comment on this article.
0530 GMT
London Sunday 13 July 2008
NETWORK RAIL is involved with ‘Crossrail'. How has it been behaving? Has it been found to have been as callous and unreliable? INDEED.
As the evidence represented in one scandal that has been found in Islington:
NETWORK is CHEATWORK rail. As NETWORK RAIL AND Islington council ‘planning’ staff have been caught [see the full text of the report from an Islington based publication, we reproduced below] CHEATING the community in Islington, we ask again: how much more evidence of corruption should be found before the failing, wasteful outfits are either disposed of or their ‘contracts’ seriously reviewed and then rescinded and done away with? How much more evidence of Council ‘planners’ behaving against transparency and community rights and good finance before they are given the overdue SACK that they deserve? How much more losses must be allowed to be caused to the local environment, the local economy before CHEATWORK RAIL are given the marching orders and stopped from looting the public while the needs of the community are neglected?
[To be continued]
Islington Tribune - by PETER GRUNER
Published: 11 July 2008
Footbridge study was ‘duplicitous’
A CONTROVERSIAL £60,000 feasibility study into a footbridge that could unite communities on either side of King’s Cross station was already “weighted against the scheme” before it was launched, according to claims this week.
Network Rail ruled out the £5million footbridge last month – promised originally in plans for the railway land redevelopment – on the grounds of costs and security complications.
But campaigners argued this week that the original brief for the study was “unneces sarily complicated”.
Islington Labour councillor Paul Convery, chairman of the west area planning committee, accused Network Rail and Camden planners, who provided the brief for the feasibility study, of being “duplicitous”.
He added: “The planners didn’t look at a simple bridge which would have stretched across the station from one side to another and which is what the residents wanted.
“Instead they looked at a complicated version with access to several platforms. Obviously that would have created a security nightmare and be costly. So the whole scheme was dropped.”
* The scheme will be discussed at a meeting by the King’s Cross Rail Group on Thursday at the Blessed Sacrament Church in Copenhagen Street, Barnsbury, at 7pm.
Comment on this article.
NETWORK RAIL has been caught acting as CHEAT WORK rail! As CHEAT WORK Rail is close to 'Crossrail' pluggers, we say: SCRAP CRASSRAIL!
Depriving inner cities, or worse, ADDING to poverty in the inner cities, like Crossrail hole/s, is not the way forward, Gordon!
By©Muhammad Haque
2235 Hrs GMT
London Saturday
12 July 2008
Gordon Brown is defying all reasonable, lawful and constitutional advice, evidence e and warnings to him about his ill-advised ‘commitment to the Crossrail hole plot.
Why is he doing so?
There is no answer in what he has said so far on Crossrail.
As we have been publishing daily, there CAN BE NO EVIDENCE in support of Brown’s commitment to the London Crossrail.
It is a poverty-creating project.
It is at variance with his stated opposition to poverty.
Why then is Brown sticking by Crossrail?
We have to look at other possible causes.
Including his state of mind. We shall go to a psychological site in the next parts.
For this part,w e refer to Zimbabwe and the Sino-Russian veto on sanctions move that the USA and Brown had tabled.
Will Gordon Brown be ‘vindicated’ over the Russian veto ‘freeze’ [as Brown claimed in the House of Commons speech in effect] over the USA-UK move at the Security Council to vote for sanctions against Robert Mugabe-fronted regime? This is a question that has arisen because the Russians used their veto and opposed the USA-UK move to have the sanctions imposed against Zimbabwe.
What the final ‘evidence’ published may show about Gordon Brown’s ‘deal ‘ with Moscow’s Dmitry Medvedev before the security council vote, is not known. Yet. But nobody is waiting for the final evidence to be published before making comments on Gordon Brown’s judgement!.
Despite his ‘diplomatic’ words, alleging unanimity across ‘British politics’ [Hague’s phrase!!!] on the issue of Zimbabwe, the Tory spokesperson on world affairs William Hague has already [during today Saturday 12 July 2008] fuelled speculation into the truth of what actually happened at the G8 summit where Brown allegedly bagged the Russians' support against Mugabe.
Whatever the actual facts, the comments mill is at full spin. So much so that the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been aware of it. Thus asking: how is it that Gordon Brown can be subjected to such intense analysis on everything else but not on CROSSRAIL?
[To be continued]
What exactly is the secret of this ‘eternal unanimity’ [my words] across ‘British politics’ [my, Muhammad HAQUE;s, as different from William Hague’s, phrase!]
"
Islington Tribune - by PETER GRUNER
Published: 11 July 2008
Footbridge study was ‘duplicitous’
A CONTROVERSIAL £60,000 feasibility study into a footbridge that could unite communities on either side of King’s Cross station was already “weighted against the scheme” before it was launched, according to claims this week.
Network Rail ruled out the £5million footbridge last month – promised originally in plans for the railway land redevelopment – on the grounds of costs and security complications.
But campaigners argued this week that the original brief for the study was “unneces sarily complicated”.
Islington Labour councillor Paul Convery, chairman of the west area planning committee, accused Network Rail and Camden planners, who provided the brief for the feasibility study, of being “duplicitous”.
He added: “The planners didn’t look at a simple bridge which would have stretched across the station from one side to another and which is what the residents wanted.
“Instead they looked at a complicated version with access to several platforms. Obviously that would have created a security nightmare and be costly. So the whole scheme was dropped.”
* The scheme will be discussed at a meeting by the King’s Cross Rail Group on Thursday at the Blessed Sacrament Church in Copenhagen Street, Barnsbury, at 7pm.
Comment on this article.
"
By©Muhammad Haque
2235 Hrs GMT
London Saturday
12 July 2008
Gordon Brown is defying all reasonable, lawful and constitutional advice, evidence e and warnings to him about his ill-advised ‘commitment to the Crossrail hole plot.
Why is he doing so?
There is no answer in what he has said so far on Crossrail.
As we have been publishing daily, there CAN BE NO EVIDENCE in support of Brown’s commitment to the London Crossrail.
It is a poverty-creating project.
It is at variance with his stated opposition to poverty.
Why then is Brown sticking by Crossrail?
We have to look at other possible causes.
Including his state of mind. We shall go to a psychological site in the next parts.
For this part,w e refer to Zimbabwe and the Sino-Russian veto on sanctions move that the USA and Brown had tabled.
Will Gordon Brown be ‘vindicated’ over the Russian veto ‘freeze’ [as Brown claimed in the House of Commons speech in effect] over the USA-UK move at the Security Council to vote for sanctions against Robert Mugabe-fronted regime? This is a question that has arisen because the Russians used their veto and opposed the USA-UK move to have the sanctions imposed against Zimbabwe.
What the final ‘evidence’ published may show about Gordon Brown’s ‘deal ‘ with Moscow’s Dmitry Medvedev before the security council vote, is not known. Yet. But nobody is waiting for the final evidence to be published before making comments on Gordon Brown’s judgement!.
Despite his ‘diplomatic’ words, alleging unanimity across ‘British politics’ [Hague’s phrase!!!] on the issue of Zimbabwe, the Tory spokesperson on world affairs William Hague has already [during today Saturday 12 July 2008] fuelled speculation into the truth of what actually happened at the G8 summit where Brown allegedly bagged the Russians' support against Mugabe.
Whatever the actual facts, the comments mill is at full spin. So much so that the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been aware of it. Thus asking: how is it that Gordon Brown can be subjected to such intense analysis on everything else but not on CROSSRAIL?
[To be continued]
What exactly is the secret of this ‘eternal unanimity’ [my words] across ‘British politics’ [my, Muhammad HAQUE;s, as different from William Hague’s, phrase!]
"
Islington Tribune - by PETER GRUNER
Published: 11 July 2008
Footbridge study was ‘duplicitous’
A CONTROVERSIAL £60,000 feasibility study into a footbridge that could unite communities on either side of King’s Cross station was already “weighted against the scheme” before it was launched, according to claims this week.
Network Rail ruled out the £5million footbridge last month – promised originally in plans for the railway land redevelopment – on the grounds of costs and security complications.
But campaigners argued this week that the original brief for the study was “unneces sarily complicated”.
Islington Labour councillor Paul Convery, chairman of the west area planning committee, accused Network Rail and Camden planners, who provided the brief for the feasibility study, of being “duplicitous”.
He added: “The planners didn’t look at a simple bridge which would have stretched across the station from one side to another and which is what the residents wanted.
“Instead they looked at a complicated version with access to several platforms. Obviously that would have created a security nightmare and be costly. So the whole scheme was dropped.”
* The scheme will be discussed at a meeting by the King’s Cross Rail Group on Thursday at the Blessed Sacrament Church in Copenhagen Street, Barnsbury, at 7pm.
Comment on this article.
"
Is Gordon Brown miraculously immune from all charges, so long as he sticks by his backing for the CRASS Crossrail hole plot, London?
Depriving inner cities, or worse, ADDING to poverty in the inner cities, like Crossrail hole/s, is not the way forward, Gordon!
By©Muhammad Haque
2235 Hrs GMT
London Saturday
12 July 2008
Gordon Brown is defying all reasonable, lawful and constitutional advice, evidence e and warnings to him about his ill-advised ‘commitment to the Crossrail hole plot.
Why is he doing so?
There is no answer in what he has said so far on Crossrail.
As we have been publishing daily, there CAN BE NO EVIDENCE in support of Brown’s commitment to the London Crossrail.
It is a poverty-creating project.
It is at variance with his stated opposition to poverty.
Why then is Brown sticking by Crossrail?
We have to look at other possible causes.
Including his state of mind. We shall go to a psychological site in the next parts.
For this part,w e refer to Zimbabwe and the Sino-Russian veto on sanctions move that the USA and Brown had tabled.
Will Gordon Brown be ‘vindicated’ over the Russian veto ‘freeze’ [as Brown claimed in the House of Commons speech in effect] over the USA-UK move at the Security Council to vote for sanctions against Robert Mugabe-fronted regime? This is a question that has arisen because the Russians used their veto and opposed the USA-UK move to have the sanctions imposed against Zimbabwe.
What the final ‘evidence’ published may show about Gordon Brown’s ‘deal ‘ with Moscow’s Dmitry Medvedev before the security council vote, is not known. Yet. But nobody is waiting for the final evidence to be published before making comments on Gordon Brown’s judgement!.
Despite his ‘diplomatic’ words, alleging unanimity across ‘British politics’ [Hague’s phrase!!!] on the issue of Zimbabwe, the Tory spokesperson on world affairs William Hague has already [during today Saturday 12 July 2008] fuelled speculation into the truth of what actually happened at the G8 summit where Brown allegedly bagged the Russians' support against Mugabe.
Whatever the actual facts, the comments mill is at full spin. So much so that the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been aware of it. Thus asking: how is it that Gordon Brown can be subjected to such intense analysis on everything else but not on CROSSRAIL?
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
2235 Hrs GMT
London Saturday
12 July 2008
Gordon Brown is defying all reasonable, lawful and constitutional advice, evidence e and warnings to him about his ill-advised ‘commitment to the Crossrail hole plot.
Why is he doing so?
There is no answer in what he has said so far on Crossrail.
As we have been publishing daily, there CAN BE NO EVIDENCE in support of Brown’s commitment to the London Crossrail.
It is a poverty-creating project.
It is at variance with his stated opposition to poverty.
Why then is Brown sticking by Crossrail?
We have to look at other possible causes.
Including his state of mind. We shall go to a psychological site in the next parts.
For this part,w e refer to Zimbabwe and the Sino-Russian veto on sanctions move that the USA and Brown had tabled.
Will Gordon Brown be ‘vindicated’ over the Russian veto ‘freeze’ [as Brown claimed in the House of Commons speech in effect] over the USA-UK move at the Security Council to vote for sanctions against Robert Mugabe-fronted regime? This is a question that has arisen because the Russians used their veto and opposed the USA-UK move to have the sanctions imposed against Zimbabwe.
What the final ‘evidence’ published may show about Gordon Brown’s ‘deal ‘ with Moscow’s Dmitry Medvedev before the security council vote, is not known. Yet. But nobody is waiting for the final evidence to be published before making comments on Gordon Brown’s judgement!.
Despite his ‘diplomatic’ words, alleging unanimity across ‘British politics’ [Hague’s phrase!!!] on the issue of Zimbabwe, the Tory spokesperson on world affairs William Hague has already [during today Saturday 12 July 2008] fuelled speculation into the truth of what actually happened at the G8 summit where Brown allegedly bagged the Russians' support against Mugabe.
Whatever the actual facts, the comments mill is at full spin. So much so that the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been aware of it. Thus asking: how is it that Gordon Brown can be subjected to such intense analysis on everything else but not on CROSSRAIL?
[To be continued]
As Gordon Brown's judgement AGAIN comes under attack, how can it be that he is infallible on Crossrail hole plot alone?
As Gordon Brown's judgement AGAIN comes under attack, how can it be that he is infallible on Crossrail hole plot alone?
More, here, shortly
More, here, shortly
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
Saturday, 12 July 2008
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
2000 GMT 2100 UK Time London Saturday 12 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! is the reasonable, ordinary, common sense, lawful, legal, constitutional, ethical, moral environmental CAMPAIGN against waste of public resource by the UK Government that is being operated by elements inside the Govt bureaucracies who are in fact representative of Big Business the Big businesses have bought the soul and the minds and the attention of the decision -makers within the Govt...
KHOODEELAAR! is the antidote to all of that and above all, KHOODEELAAR! is the unique audit of the holders of 'elected office' in the name of inner city East End of London...
What KHOODEELAAR! says today on the facts, on the evidence and on the empirical studies and the factual updates of the situation concerning the ongoing imposition of poverty-creating activities via the local Tower Hamlets Council and via the other ‘power’-linked ‘holders’ of elected posts and the recipients of profitable [personally to them and at the expense of the community across the East End of London ] unelected but sub-legitimate and QUANGO-ed linked posts and connections, will be vindicated tomorrow.
The Khoodeelaar! movement is part of the same empirical foundation whence Tony McNulty, the 'minister' currently being used to front the assault on civil liberties and fundamental rights in Britain under the pretext of protecting the UK from 'greater threats to society' [=’Counter-Terrorism Bill 2008’] , had been questioned YEARS earlier about the Blairing SQUANDERING of the peoples’ mandate. The mandate as it had been expressed in May 1997....
. Khoodeelaar! has pointed out in the course of the 55 months of the campaign against Crossrail hole plot and agenda so far, the various personal and equally unpublicised other links that McNulty has with the controlling clique on and in Tower Hamlets Council.... It is via those links that McNulty would have been acquainted with the realties on the grounds of poverty and the role in creating poverty that the Council and its allied bureaucracies played...McNulty was also present at an otherwise innocent location [the Altab Ali Park] almost 3 years ago when he posed for publicity photographs near the site of one of the underground explosions that cost the innocent peoples’ lives... So McNulty has been in ‘touch’ with elements in Tower Hamlets IN THE NAME of Government as well....
Some of those who appeared with him in the series of promotional photos and related ‘facilities’ events, would be included among McNulty’s links... It was not just his own reported wife, Christine Gilbert who was still employed in the Tower Hamlets Council [as ‘chief executive’ - she was given that job despite not being the best candidate, because some key controlling clique members who appointed her, found her to be willing to overlook the conduct of the key controlling cliqusters] that McNulty would have ‘consulted’ about the 'situation'... Khoodeelaar! has evidence showing that McNulty knows quite a few individuals that are close to or are at the centre of the clique in control of Tower Hamlets CROSSRAIL hole plot-INVITING Council.... And he would therefore know that the area is not going to welcome another deprivation programme which is what the Crossrail, hole plot is... So what role has McNulty played in the actual drafting of what is now known as the hole-imposing ‘Crossrail Bill’? He was in the Crossrail hole plot-peddling DfT [=UK ‘Department for Transport’, then fronted by the current UK Finance Minister Alistair Darling] in 2004-2005... We shall examine further McNulty’s crucial role in the planned further creation of poverty in the East End of London via the implementation - and the imposition - of the Crossrail hole plot and programme. We shall look at McNulty’s linked role in the erosion of fundamental civil liberties that McNulty is now being used to front in the fanatical way that he has been. We shall show in context the serious and far reaching adverse and disproportionate effect on the community in the East End of London that BOTH pieces of McNulty-linked and over-hyped Blairing legislation will have:...... [To be continued]
Posted by AADHIKARonline London UK April 2007 at 13:08 0 com
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
Crossrail is linked with Tony McNulty. As are the attacks on fundamental constitutional liberties and freedoms in the UK
2000 GMT 2100 UK Time London Saturday 12 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! is the reasonable, ordinary, common sense, lawful, legal, constitutional, ethical, moral environmental CAMPAIGN against waste of public resource by the UK Government that is being operated by elements inside the Govt bureaucracies who are in fact representative of Big Business the Big businesses have bought the soul and the minds and the attention of the decision -makers within the Govt...
KHOODEELAAR! is the antidote to all of that and above all, KHOODEELAAR! is the unique audit of the holders of 'elected office' in the name of inner city East End of London...
What KHOODEELAAR! says today on the facts, on the evidence and on the empirical studies and the factual updates of the situation concerning the ongoing imposition of poverty-creating activities via the local Tower Hamlets Council and via the other ‘power’-linked ‘holders’ of elected posts and the recipients of profitable [personally to them and at the expense of the community across the East End of London ] unelected but sub-legitimate and QUANGO-ed linked posts and connections, will be vindicated tomorrow.
The Khoodeelaar! movement is part of the same empirical foundation whence Tony McNulty, the 'minister' currently being used to front the assault on civil liberties and fundamental rights in Britain under the pretext of protecting the UK from 'greater threats to society' [=’Counter-Terrorism Bill 2008’] , had been questioned YEARS earlier about the Blairing SQUANDERING of the peoples’ mandate. The mandate as it had been expressed in May 1997....
. Khoodeelaar! has pointed out in the course of the 55 months of the campaign against Crossrail hole plot and agenda so far, the various personal and equally unpublicised other links that McNulty has with the controlling clique on and in Tower Hamlets Council.... It is via those links that McNulty would have been acquainted with the realties on the grounds of poverty and the role in creating poverty that the Council and its allied bureaucracies played...McNulty was also present at an otherwise innocent location [the Altab Ali Park] almost 3 years ago when he posed for publicity photographs near the site of one of the underground explosions that cost the innocent peoples’ lives... So McNulty has been in ‘touch’ with elements in Tower Hamlets IN THE NAME of Government as well....
Some of those who appeared with him in the series of promotional photos and related ‘facilities’ events, would be included among McNulty’s links... It was not just his own reported wife, Christine Gilbert who was still employed in the Tower Hamlets Council [as ‘chief executive’ - she was given that job despite not being the best candidate, because some key controlling clique members who appointed her, found her to be willing to overlook the conduct of the key controlling cliqusters] that McNulty would have ‘consulted’ about the 'situation'... Khoodeelaar! has evidence showing that McNulty knows quite a few individuals that are close to or are at the centre of the clique in control of Tower Hamlets CROSSRAIL hole plot-INVITING Council.... And he would therefore know that the area is not going to welcome another deprivation programme which is what the Crossrail, hole plot is... So what role has McNulty played in the actual drafting of what is now known as the hole-imposing ‘Crossrail Bill’? He was in the Crossrail hole plot-peddling DfT [=UK ‘Department for Transport’, then fronted by the current UK Finance Minister Alistair Darling] in 2004-2005... We shall examine further McNulty’s crucial role in the planned further creation of poverty in the East End of London via the implementation - and the imposition - of the Crossrail hole plot and programme. We shall look at McNulty’s linked role in the erosion of fundamental civil liberties that McNulty is now being used to front in the fanatical way that he has been. We shall show in context the serious and far reaching adverse and disproportionate effect on the community in the East End of London that BOTH pieces of McNulty-linked and over-hyped Blairing legislation will have:...... [To be continued]
Posted by AADHIKARonline London UK April 2007 at 13:08 0 com
Friday, July 11, 2008
Crossrail hole Bill 'draft'-'writer' Tony McNulty now 'writes' to do away with civil liberties in Britain....
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties 'minister' Tony McNulty?
the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....
By©Muhammad Haque
2045 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?
Why is this question being asked?
The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.
First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.
McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.
Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]
By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.
Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.
Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.
Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.
And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.
What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?
Because that was what he was saying!
Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.
Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.
Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.
No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.
In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.
Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].
No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.
McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.
I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….
Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.
It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.
He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.
The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’
McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.
And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.
Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.
It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.
This is worrying.
How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies belief…
[To be continued]
the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....
By©Muhammad Haque
2045 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?
Why is this question being asked?
The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.
First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.
McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.
Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]
By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.
Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.
Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.
Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.
And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.
What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?
Because that was what he was saying!
Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.
Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.
Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.
No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.
In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.
Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].
No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.
McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.
I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….
Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.
It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.
He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.
The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’
McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.
And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.
Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.
It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.
This is worrying.
How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies belief…
[To be continued]
Crossrail hole Bill 'draft'-'writer' Tony McNulty now 'writes' to do away with civil liberties in Britain....
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties 'minister' Tony McNulty?
the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....
By©Muhammad Haque
2045 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?
Why is this question being asked?
The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.
First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.
McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.
Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]
By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.
Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.
Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.
Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.
And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.
What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?
Because that was what he was saying!
Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.
Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.
Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.
No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.
In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.
Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].
No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.
McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.
I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….
Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.
It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.
He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.
The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’
McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.
And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.
Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.
It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.
This is worrying.
How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies believe…
[To be continued]
the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....
By©Muhammad Haque
2045 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?
Why is this question being asked?
The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.
First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.
McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.
Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]
By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.
Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.
Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.
Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.
And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.
What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?
Because that was what he was saying!
Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.
Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.
Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.
No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.
In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.
Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].
No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.
McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.
I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….
Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.
It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.
He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.
The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’
McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.
And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.
Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.
It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.
This is worrying.
How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies believe…
[To be continued]
Boris Johnson has got to know what his Party Chair Francis Maude said AGAINST the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London
Boris Johnson has got to know what his Party Chair Francis Maude said AGAINST the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London
1320 GMT 1420 UK London Friday 11 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! action archive of the MUHAMMAD HAQUE interview of the then Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude [still an MP in the UK House fo Commons].on what he and his Part would say and o against the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End fo London The interview was conducted in Brick Lane London E1 and published in transcript in the same afternoon on Monday 24 April 2006....In the two years and two months since then, we have observed the behaviour of the Conservative Party in the UK Parliament,.. An updater commentary on that will appear here soon. First the interview with Francis Maude [see below] [To be continued]
AADHIKARonline transcript of the question and answer between Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque and Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude, in Brick Lane London E1 at 1210 Hrs appx GMT on Monday 24 April 2006
Transcript posted on aadhikaronline web pages at 1345 Hrs GMT Monday 24 April 2006
1. Muhammad Haque [Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 area No to Crossrail hole Bill] : Hello can I ask you a Question from Khoodeelaar?
Francis Maude: Yes. Do.
2. Muhammad Haque: [Khoodeelaar is] the Campaign against Crossrail hole [in the Brick Lane London E1 area]
3. Muhammad Haque What would you say is your Party’s position?
Francis Maude: Well, we’re very much in favour of CrossRail… which we think can deliver very serious benefits to the area but we’re concerned that there shouldn’t be [slight stammer] all of the digging up of [slight stammer] the [Brick Lane London E1 ] area to make it happen, We don’t see that it’s necessary.
4. Muhammad Haque: Do you believe Alistair Darling's
Francis Maude: No
5. Muhammad Haque: [UK Transport Secretary – the Crossrail hole Minister] Alistair Darling’s statement, said in a written statement on 30 March [2006] what do you say to that?
Francis Maude: No. You see that’s simply pre-election [hesitation]] manoeuvring. I wouldn't trust anything he [Alistair Darling] says.
6. .Muhammad Haque: Are you going to take it up as a formal motion against his
Francis Maude: my colleagues are. My colleagues will be. Thank you very much.
7 Muhammad Haque: When do you expect to do that?
Francis Maude: Well, very soon.
”
1320 GMT 1420 UK London Friday 11 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! action archive of the MUHAMMAD HAQUE interview of the then Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude [still an MP in the UK House fo Commons].on what he and his Part would say and o against the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End fo London The interview was conducted in Brick Lane London E1 and published in transcript in the same afternoon on Monday 24 April 2006....In the two years and two months since then, we have observed the behaviour of the Conservative Party in the UK Parliament,.. An updater commentary on that will appear here soon. First the interview with Francis Maude [see below] [To be continued]
AADHIKARonline transcript of the question and answer between Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque and Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude, in Brick Lane London E1 at 1210 Hrs appx GMT on Monday 24 April 2006
Transcript posted on aadhikaronline web pages at 1345 Hrs GMT Monday 24 April 2006
1. Muhammad Haque [Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 area No to Crossrail hole Bill] : Hello can I ask you a Question from Khoodeelaar?
Francis Maude: Yes. Do.
2. Muhammad Haque: [Khoodeelaar is] the Campaign against Crossrail hole [in the Brick Lane London E1 area]
3. Muhammad Haque What would you say is your Party’s position?
Francis Maude: Well, we’re very much in favour of CrossRail… which we think can deliver very serious benefits to the area but we’re concerned that there shouldn’t be [slight stammer] all of the digging up of [slight stammer] the [Brick Lane London E1 ] area to make it happen, We don’t see that it’s necessary.
4. Muhammad Haque: Do you believe Alistair Darling's
Francis Maude: No
5. Muhammad Haque: [UK Transport Secretary – the Crossrail hole Minister] Alistair Darling’s statement, said in a written statement on 30 March [2006] what do you say to that?
Francis Maude: No. You see that’s simply pre-election [hesitation]] manoeuvring. I wouldn't trust anything he [Alistair Darling] says.
6. .Muhammad Haque: Are you going to take it up as a formal motion against his
Francis Maude: my colleagues are. My colleagues will be. Thank you very much.
7 Muhammad Haque: When do you expect to do that?
Francis Maude: Well, very soon.
”
KHOODEELAAR! exposé of the emptiness of Crossrail lobby-man Francis Salway also shows way out for Gordon Brown....
This page of AADHIKARonline was last edited at 1212GMT Fri 11.07.2008
You quote Francis salway as saying about Crossrail:
"The key bit was about London’s contribution to GDP, its share in the growth of exports and how a strong London leads to growth outside the capital. We were able to show how many businesses that had set up in London went on to open offices outside the city. It was an example of how getting facts can help with lobbying.’ "
It is to be noted that there is no reference to the transport needs of London people. There is no reference to the severe income disparity that exists between every two parts of central London. There is no reference to the severely persistent jobless rates in ALL London boroughs. There is no mention of the English regions in the context of the economic performance of the UK as a whole. No comparative or even basic recognition of the human resources that are wasted by bad management and poor maintenance of existing transport infrastructure in London, in the suburbs and in the regions... So what Francis Salway did was to LOBBY. Pure and simple. No evidence needed to justify the allocation of £Billions of public money to a scam that was NOT recommended in the report authored in the name of Rod Eddington. The two ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committees’ in the two Houses of the UK parliament were either barred from receiving evidence showing up the shallowness and overwhelming irrelevance and wastefulness of Crossrail or were too callously constituted and stooged themselves to seek such evidence from interested parties and objectors. If Gordon Brown is going to be liable for wasting £Billions on Crossrail then at least on this one, he will know who conned him and tricked him into doing so. We say even at this stage, Gordon Brown and the UK economy will be better off scrapping the crassly conceived London Crossrail scam.
You quote Francis salway as saying about Crossrail:
"The key bit was about London’s contribution to GDP, its share in the growth of exports and how a strong London leads to growth outside the capital. We were able to show how many businesses that had set up in London went on to open offices outside the city. It was an example of how getting facts can help with lobbying.’ "
It is to be noted that there is no reference to the transport needs of London people. There is no reference to the severe income disparity that exists between every two parts of central London. There is no reference to the severely persistent jobless rates in ALL London boroughs. There is no mention of the English regions in the context of the economic performance of the UK as a whole. No comparative or even basic recognition of the human resources that are wasted by bad management and poor maintenance of existing transport infrastructure in London, in the suburbs and in the regions... So what Francis Salway did was to LOBBY. Pure and simple. No evidence needed to justify the allocation of £Billions of public money to a scam that was NOT recommended in the report authored in the name of Rod Eddington. The two ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committees’ in the two Houses of the UK parliament were either barred from receiving evidence showing up the shallowness and overwhelming irrelevance and wastefulness of Crossrail or were too callously constituted and stooged themselves to seek such evidence from interested parties and objectors. If Gordon Brown is going to be liable for wasting £Billions on Crossrail then at least on this one, he will know who conned him and tricked him into doing so. We say even at this stage, Gordon Brown and the UK economy will be better off scrapping the crassly conceived London Crossrail scam.
KHOODEELAAR! expose of the emptiness of Crossrail lobby-man Francis Salway also shows way out for Gordon Brown....
You quote Francis salway as saying about Crossrail:
"The key bit was about London’s contribution to GDP, its share in the growth of exports and how a strong London leads to growth outside the capital. We were able to show how many businesses that had set up in London went on to open offices outside the city. It was an example of how getting facts can help with lobbying.’ "
It is to be noted that there is no reference to the transport needs of London people.
There is no reference to the severe income disparity that exists between every two parts of central London.
There is no reference to the severely persistent jobless rates in ALL London boroughs.
There is no mention of the English regions in the context of the economic performance of the UK as a whole.
No comparative or even basic recognition of the human resources that are wasted by bad management and poor maintenance of existing transport infrastructure in London, in the suburbs and in the regions...
So what Francis Salway did was to LOBBY. Pure and simple.
No evidence needed to justify the allocation of £Billions of public money to a scam that was NOT recommended in the report authored in the name of Rod Eddington.
The two ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committees’ in the two Houses of the UK parliament were either barred from receiving evidence showing up the shallowness and overwhelming irrelevance and wastefulness of Crossrail or were too callously constituted and stooged themselves to seek such evidence from interested parties and objectors. If Gordon Brown is going to be liable for wasting £Billions on Crossrail then at least on this one, he will know who conned him and tricked him into doing so. We say even at this stage, Gordon Brown and the UK economy will be better off scrapping the crassly conceived London Crossrail scam.
KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business CRASSrail hole scam
"The key bit was about London’s contribution to GDP, its share in the growth of exports and how a strong London leads to growth outside the capital. We were able to show how many businesses that had set up in London went on to open offices outside the city. It was an example of how getting facts can help with lobbying.’ "
It is to be noted that there is no reference to the transport needs of London people.
There is no reference to the severe income disparity that exists between every two parts of central London.
There is no reference to the severely persistent jobless rates in ALL London boroughs.
There is no mention of the English regions in the context of the economic performance of the UK as a whole.
No comparative or even basic recognition of the human resources that are wasted by bad management and poor maintenance of existing transport infrastructure in London, in the suburbs and in the regions...
So what Francis Salway did was to LOBBY. Pure and simple.
No evidence needed to justify the allocation of £Billions of public money to a scam that was NOT recommended in the report authored in the name of Rod Eddington.
The two ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committees’ in the two Houses of the UK parliament were either barred from receiving evidence showing up the shallowness and overwhelming irrelevance and wastefulness of Crossrail or were too callously constituted and stooged themselves to seek such evidence from interested parties and objectors. If Gordon Brown is going to be liable for wasting £Billions on Crossrail then at least on this one, he will know who conned him and tricked him into doing so. We say even at this stage, Gordon Brown and the UK economy will be better off scrapping the crassly conceived London Crossrail scam.
KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business CRASSrail hole scam
Boris Johnson has got to know what his Party Chair Francis Maude said AGAINST the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London
This AADHIKARonline page was last edited at 1320 Hrs GMT London Friday 11 July 2008
1320 GMT 1420 UK London Friday 11 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! action archive of the MUHAMMAD HAQUE interview of the then Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude [still an MP in the UK House fo Commons].on what he and his Part would say and o against the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End fo London The interview was conducted in Brick Lane London E1 and published in transcript in the same afternoon on Monday 24 April 2006....In the two years and two months since then, we have observed the behaviour of the Conservative Party in the UK Parliament,.. An updater commentary on that will appear here soon. First the interview with Francis Maude [see below] [To be continued]
AADHIKARonline transcript of the question and answer between Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque and Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude, in Brick Lane London E1 at 1210 Hrs appx GMT on Monday 24 April 2006
Transcript posted on aadhikaronline web pages at 1345 Hrs GMT Monday 24 April 2006
1. Muhammad Haque [Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 area No to Crossrail hole Bill] : Hello can I ask you a Question from Khoodeelaar?
Francis Maude: Yes. Do.
2. Muhammad Haque: [Khoodeelaar is] the Campaign against Crossrail hole [in the Brick Lane London E1 area]
3. Muhammad Haque What would you say is your Party’s position?
Francis Maude: Well, we’re very much in favour of CrossRail… which we think can deliver very serious benefits to the area but we’re concerned that there shouldn’t be [slight stammer] all of the digging up of [slight stammer] the [Brick Lane London E1 ] area to make it happen, We don’t see that it’s necessary.
4. Muhammad Haque: Do you believe Alistair Darling's
Francis Maude: No
5. Muhammad Haque: [UK Transport Secretary – the Crossrail hole Minister] Alistair Darling’s statement, said in a written statement on 30 March [2006] what do you say to that?
Francis Maude: No. You see that’s simply pre-election [hesitation]] manoeuvring. I wouldn't trust anything he [Alistair Darling] says.
6. .Muhammad Haque: Are you going to take it up as a formal motion against his
Francis Maude: my colleagues are. My colleagues will be. Thank you very much.
7 Muhammad Haque: When do you expect to do that?
Francis Maude: Well, very soon.
”
1320 GMT 1420 UK London Friday 11 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! action archive of the MUHAMMAD HAQUE interview of the then Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude [still an MP in the UK House fo Commons].on what he and his Part would say and o against the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End fo London The interview was conducted in Brick Lane London E1 and published in transcript in the same afternoon on Monday 24 April 2006....In the two years and two months since then, we have observed the behaviour of the Conservative Party in the UK Parliament,.. An updater commentary on that will appear here soon. First the interview with Francis Maude [see below] [To be continued]
AADHIKARonline transcript of the question and answer between Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque and Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude, in Brick Lane London E1 at 1210 Hrs appx GMT on Monday 24 April 2006
Transcript posted on aadhikaronline web pages at 1345 Hrs GMT Monday 24 April 2006
1. Muhammad Haque [Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 area No to Crossrail hole Bill] : Hello can I ask you a Question from Khoodeelaar?
Francis Maude: Yes. Do.
2. Muhammad Haque: [Khoodeelaar is] the Campaign against Crossrail hole [in the Brick Lane London E1 area]
3. Muhammad Haque What would you say is your Party’s position?
Francis Maude: Well, we’re very much in favour of CrossRail… which we think can deliver very serious benefits to the area but we’re concerned that there shouldn’t be [slight stammer] all of the digging up of [slight stammer] the [Brick Lane London E1 ] area to make it happen, We don’t see that it’s necessary.
4. Muhammad Haque: Do you believe Alistair Darling's
Francis Maude: No
5. Muhammad Haque: [UK Transport Secretary – the Crossrail hole Minister] Alistair Darling’s statement, said in a written statement on 30 March [2006] what do you say to that?
Francis Maude: No. You see that’s simply pre-election [hesitation]] manoeuvring. I wouldn't trust anything he [Alistair Darling] says.
6. .Muhammad Haque: Are you going to take it up as a formal motion against his
Francis Maude: my colleagues are. My colleagues will be. Thank you very much.
7 Muhammad Haque: When do you expect to do that?
Francis Maude: Well, very soon.
”
Crossrail 'lobby' man confesses to in effect having conned Gordon Brown to commit £Billions of public money...
This page of AADHIKARonline was last edited at 0955 GMT 11 July 2008
0950 GMT 1050 UKTime London Friday 11 July 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘CRASSness, dishonesty, abuse of public funds for Big Business agenda crossrail hole Plot...” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! THAT just as Ken Livingstone has confessed to having LIED to get the diversionary, uneconomic, socially divisive and degenerating = deprivation-creating [contrary to his double-whammy lying confession] public funding for the 2012 Olympic Games hosting stunt [that has been spiralling out of all limits in cost overruns] so have they LIED to get Gordon Brown to commit £Billions to the Big Business Crossrail hole plot..... This is in effect admitted by Francis Salway, one of those involved in the elaborate fabrication of the ‘Crossrail lobby’ ...Salway’ admission again shows that CROSSRAIL is indeed CRASS... That it has lacked substance and merit from the start and that they have been faking, fabricating, making up to peddle it ,, and that the only main beneficiary will be the Big Business behind the construction scams.... Crossrail is NOT about addressing transport needs of Lon don at all... This is exposed in the banal admissions by Francis Salway as published today.
[To be continued]
0950 GMT 1050 UKTime London Friday 11 July 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘CRASSness, dishonesty, abuse of public funds for Big Business agenda crossrail hole Plot...” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! THAT just as Ken Livingstone has confessed to having LIED to get the diversionary, uneconomic, socially divisive and degenerating = deprivation-creating [contrary to his double-whammy lying confession] public funding for the 2012 Olympic Games hosting stunt [that has been spiralling out of all limits in cost overruns] so have they LIED to get Gordon Brown to commit £Billions to the Big Business Crossrail hole plot..... This is in effect admitted by Francis Salway, one of those involved in the elaborate fabrication of the ‘Crossrail lobby’ ...Salway’ admission again shows that CROSSRAIL is indeed CRASS... That it has lacked substance and merit from the start and that they have been faking, fabricating, making up to peddle it ,, and that the only main beneficiary will be the Big Business behind the construction scams.... Crossrail is NOT about addressing transport needs of Lon don at all... This is exposed in the banal admissions by Francis Salway as published today.
[To be continued]
Fact-based lies for CRASSrail lobby confession by Francis Salway confirms what we have said all along:
This page of AADHIKARonline last edited at 0930 GMT Fri 11.07.2008
That they lied and fabricated to 'make the case for Crossrail' and to get Gordon Brown to make the public money to the tune of £Billions, is in effect admitted in a propaganda item published today.
More, here, shortly
That they lied and fabricated to 'make the case for Crossrail' and to get Gordon Brown to make the public money to the tune of £Billions, is in effect admitted in a propaganda item published today.
More, here, shortly
Thursday, July 10, 2008
BBC kept up its agenda of sabotaging the campaign against 42 day detention, at Haltemprice by-election results
This version of AADHIKARonline last edited at 0330 GMT Fri 11.07.2008
Tim Wilcox, fronting the News Channel suppression, made incoherent excuses for the entire proceedings of the announcement of the results being effectively sabotaged by the BBC...
They managed, significantly, to keep broadcasting their biased and lies-filled 'comments' by Ian Watson, their so-called political reporter...
See also the AADHIKARonline review of the behaviour of Michael Crick, the BBC's allegedly expert by-election specialist... [The disgraceful careerism of the late Vincent Hannah will be revisited]
[To be continued]
[
Tim Wilcox, fronting the News Channel suppression, made incoherent excuses for the entire proceedings of the announcement of the results being effectively sabotaged by the BBC...
They managed, significantly, to keep broadcasting their biased and lies-filled 'comments' by Ian Watson, their so-called political reporter...
See also the AADHIKARonline review of the behaviour of Michael Crick, the BBC's allegedly expert by-election specialist... [The disgraceful careerism of the late Vincent Hannah will be revisited]
[To be continued]
[
BBC Question Time exposes Mark Thompson's bragging utterances to an MPs group: He has to drop Saira Khan ...and the ignorance that she personifies
This edition of AADHIKARonline was edited at 2250 GMT Thursday 10.07.2008
BBC Question Time exposes Mark Thompson's bragging utterances to an MPs group: He has to drop Saira Khan ...and the ignorance that she personifies
More, here, shortly
BBC Question Time exposes Mark Thompson's bragging utterances to an MPs group: He has to drop Saira Khan ...and the ignorance that she personifies
More, here, shortly
What cost and what price Haltemprice & Howden? How CLOSE is the issue to who might have drafted the Crossrail Bill plot?
Part 3 of today's commentary on the goings on 'in and around' the British parliament., due here. soon
Crossrail hole plot-backer Alistair Darling's excuses in the Commons today are as untrue as his claims for CRASSrail...
By©Muhammad Haque
1615 Hrs GMT
London Thursday
10 July 2008
This action commentary is about Alistair Darling and Ken Livingstone, two of the peddlers of the CRASSrail hole plot. This commentary is in four parts:
PART 1
Ken Livingstone's self-promoting, ego-linked, careeristic opportunism was displayed again this week when he was able to sneak into the focal lenses of the various licensed broadcast media as he paraded his need for attention via one of the UK House of Commons committees... The excuse for the broadcast media peddling the pathetic appearances was that Livingstone was the former mayor' in the name of London. There was no truth in what he said about various UK Govt departments. For it was one of those Departments, the DfT that he had used to the limits to push for the Crassrail hole plot. Did he make any comp,aunt against that? Did he tell how he LIED to various Govt Departments over the stunt around the London bid to host the 2012 Olympic games? Did he tell how he lied to get Gordon Brown to make that commitment of £Billions of UK public cash to CRASSrail? Not a bit of it. And not surprisingly, either. Because the 'Select Committee' is not made up of morally courageous, let alone constitutionally conscientious and informed people. Most of these Select Committees are STOOGED. And most of these who get on them are there because they have no better role to perform. Had there been real true and truthful scrutiny of the UK Executive then the society would have been spared so many malaise, so many misrepresentations There is a serious central lie at work in the excuses that Gordon Brown has been making for instance to explain the current economic problems. He is blaming the rest of the world. Just as Alistair Darling did Darling the ‘Treasury Questions’ this morning [Thursday 10 July 2008]... Instead of addressing the deficit of democracy and attacking dishonesty, Ken Livingstone was revelling in the defect has been Livingstone;s career.... He NEEDS lack of democracy He craves lack of accountability....As he did in February 2008 when he lost his pretence and told off a meeting of the usually tokenistic London Assembly for behaving unusually in that they [on that exceptional occasion actually] asked him Questions about how and why he was allowing abuse of funds and misusing the public's resources...while he was occupying the post in the name of the people of London
[To be continued]
London mayor Livingstone obstructs Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole
By©Muhammad Haque
1000 Hrs GMT London
Wednesday 26 April 2006
Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of aadhikaronline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude's backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
1. Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of aadhikaronline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude's backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
2. That communication from the head of Ken Livingstone’s transport department, effectively says that the Khoodeelaar! demands for Ken Livingstone to make full disclosure of all his communications with the clique of corrupt controllers of Tower Hamlets Council are too expensive for the London Mayor to comply with !
3. There is no specific item that the London Mayor has identified in his mayor communication to Khoodeelaar on Monday 24 April 2006 as constituting an allegedly over-the-permitted limit of administration cost request under the Freed of Information Act.
4. The key point is that Khoodeelaar! the campaign against the CrossRail hole Bill attacks plan on the Brick Lane London E1 area, has been issuing ken Livingstone with a series of pre-action [letter before claim] communications and the London mayor has now run out of excuses.
5. At the centre of the Khoodeelaar legal action claims against Ken Livingstone lies in the fact that the mayor has persistently misled Londoners generally and the UK Parliament through his undisclosed deals with the Transport Department and in particular the people of the East End community affected by the CrossRail hole plan.
6. Khoodeelaar! delivered the first demand to ken Livingstone for confirming a number of facts that were linked with the mayor’s release of a news item on 24 March 2006.
7. That was followed within a day or two by other calls on Livingstone to disclose the facts of his dealing with the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council.
8. It was again repeated by Khoodeelaar! no to Crossrail hole campaign updating their calls on Livingstone to deal with the factual questions that arose about the stunt from the written statement about the CrossRail hole Bill that was issued in the UK House of Commons by CrossRail hole Minister Alistair Darling on 30 March 2006.
9. The mayor is on record as having touted for the enlisting of the ‘leaders’ and ‘lead members’ of a number of local councils, including the then leader of Tower Hamlets Council [Helal Uddin Abbas] in February 2004 as part of the Livingstone lobby for CrossRail plan.
10. In a Crossrail-hole-plan promotional ‘letter’ published in 2004 under the name of Ken Livingstone together with the names of Helal Uddin Abbas and others from other local Councils, the promotion of CrossRail was made without a single qualification let alone reservation.
11. Khoodeelaar! immediately wrote to both Livingstone and demanded that the Evening Standard publish the truth about the CrossRail hole plan. Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque told the Editor of the London EVENING STANDARD that their failure to publish the truth about the CrossRail plan [as it still was - because the CrossRail hole Bill was not put before the House of Commons until 22 February 2005, almost a year after Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque was having the series of demands put on Ken Livingstone and Christine Gilbert to tell the truth of their then role in promoting the CrossRail plan. The EVENING STANDARD failed to publish the truth. As did Ken Livingstone.
12.
That was in February 2004.
13. Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque also wrote to Tower Hamlets Council chief Executive Christine Gilbert in February 2004 and in March 2004 asking for a series of detailed answers to questions about her own role in promoting the CrossRail hole plan including the question as to what advice, if any, had she, Christine Gilbert, given to the ruling clique or group on the Tower Hamlets Council. There was no reply. There has been no reply.
14. When Khoodeelaar! issued the latest then updated series of legal claims against Alistair Darling, ken Livingstone, Christine Gilbert and a few others and said that the application to the High Court in London against them would be filed on Monday 27 March 2006, a number of things immediately happened.
15. Ken Livingstone suddenly issued a news release on 24 March 2006 saying that the CrossRail Dirt hole in the Brick Lane London E1 had been scrapped!
16. And that Ken Livingstone Crossrail-Dirt-hole plan against Brick Lane London E1 area scrapping stunt announcement was then used as the peg for the evening TV news which featured the entire cabal of self-seeking politicos doing their fame slots and assorted other fantasies. They were given more time than khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque who did say on the record [BBC London News, Friday 24 April 2006] that as far as Khoodeelaar! was concerned, they had immediately asked Livingstone to substantiate the claims of the scrapping of the Crossrail Dirty hole plan and demanded that Livingstone to answer the outstanding detailed KHOODEELAAR! no to CrossRail hole questions that had been put to him as based on his unqualified plugs for the CrossRail plan over the previous years
17. Accordingly, Muhammad Haque and Khoodeelaar! campaign sent the detailed further questions immediately and also went to City hall on Monday 3 April 2006 and delivered a series of questions for Livingstone to deal with.
18. On the same occasion [3 April 2006] Khoodeelaar demonstrated the campaign’s opposition to Ken Livingstone's role so far and demanded that Livingstone come out with the overdue answers to the extensive and the very comprehensive KHOODEELAAR! No to the Crossrail hole questions which had arisen from Livingstone’s stunt staged on Friday 24 March 2006 about the alleged scrapping of the CrossRail Dirt hole.
19. Livingstone remained silent
20. Until the aadhikaronline news carried the first detailed transcripts of the Khoodeelaar! Organiser’s Questions and answers encounter with Conservative party chair Francis Maude in Brick Lane in the mid afternoon of Monday 24 April 2006.
21. Ken Livingstone’s head of Transports sent an e-mail which is full of typical Ken Livingstone's dissembling. The concept of dissembling as associated with ken Livingstone on 24 April 2006 had already been spotted and identified a month previously [on Friday 24 March 2006] out by Khoodeelaar organiser Muhammad Haque in his news interview with the BBC London political editor Tim Donovan on that date [Friday 24 March 2006].
1615 Hrs GMT
London Thursday
10 July 2008
This action commentary is about Alistair Darling and Ken Livingstone, two of the peddlers of the CRASSrail hole plot. This commentary is in four parts:
PART 1
Ken Livingstone's self-promoting, ego-linked, careeristic opportunism was displayed again this week when he was able to sneak into the focal lenses of the various licensed broadcast media as he paraded his need for attention via one of the UK House of Commons committees... The excuse for the broadcast media peddling the pathetic appearances was that Livingstone was the former mayor' in the name of London. There was no truth in what he said about various UK Govt departments. For it was one of those Departments, the DfT that he had used to the limits to push for the Crassrail hole plot. Did he make any comp,aunt against that? Did he tell how he LIED to various Govt Departments over the stunt around the London bid to host the 2012 Olympic games? Did he tell how he lied to get Gordon Brown to make that commitment of £Billions of UK public cash to CRASSrail? Not a bit of it. And not surprisingly, either. Because the 'Select Committee' is not made up of morally courageous, let alone constitutionally conscientious and informed people. Most of these Select Committees are STOOGED. And most of these who get on them are there because they have no better role to perform. Had there been real true and truthful scrutiny of the UK Executive then the society would have been spared so many malaise, so many misrepresentations There is a serious central lie at work in the excuses that Gordon Brown has been making for instance to explain the current economic problems. He is blaming the rest of the world. Just as Alistair Darling did Darling the ‘Treasury Questions’ this morning [Thursday 10 July 2008]... Instead of addressing the deficit of democracy and attacking dishonesty, Ken Livingstone was revelling in the defect has been Livingstone;s career.... He NEEDS lack of democracy He craves lack of accountability....As he did in February 2008 when he lost his pretence and told off a meeting of the usually tokenistic London Assembly for behaving unusually in that they [on that exceptional occasion actually] asked him Questions about how and why he was allowing abuse of funds and misusing the public's resources...while he was occupying the post in the name of the people of London
[To be continued]
London mayor Livingstone obstructs Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole
By©Muhammad Haque
1000 Hrs GMT London
Wednesday 26 April 2006
Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of aadhikaronline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude's backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
1. Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of aadhikaronline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude's backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
2. That communication from the head of Ken Livingstone’s transport department, effectively says that the Khoodeelaar! demands for Ken Livingstone to make full disclosure of all his communications with the clique of corrupt controllers of Tower Hamlets Council are too expensive for the London Mayor to comply with !
3. There is no specific item that the London Mayor has identified in his mayor communication to Khoodeelaar on Monday 24 April 2006 as constituting an allegedly over-the-permitted limit of administration cost request under the Freed of Information Act.
4. The key point is that Khoodeelaar! the campaign against the CrossRail hole Bill attacks plan on the Brick Lane London E1 area, has been issuing ken Livingstone with a series of pre-action [letter before claim] communications and the London mayor has now run out of excuses.
5. At the centre of the Khoodeelaar legal action claims against Ken Livingstone lies in the fact that the mayor has persistently misled Londoners generally and the UK Parliament through his undisclosed deals with the Transport Department and in particular the people of the East End community affected by the CrossRail hole plan.
6. Khoodeelaar! delivered the first demand to ken Livingstone for confirming a number of facts that were linked with the mayor’s release of a news item on 24 March 2006.
7. That was followed within a day or two by other calls on Livingstone to disclose the facts of his dealing with the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council.
8. It was again repeated by Khoodeelaar! no to Crossrail hole campaign updating their calls on Livingstone to deal with the factual questions that arose about the stunt from the written statement about the CrossRail hole Bill that was issued in the UK House of Commons by CrossRail hole Minister Alistair Darling on 30 March 2006.
9. The mayor is on record as having touted for the enlisting of the ‘leaders’ and ‘lead members’ of a number of local councils, including the then leader of Tower Hamlets Council [Helal Uddin Abbas] in February 2004 as part of the Livingstone lobby for CrossRail plan.
10. In a Crossrail-hole-plan promotional ‘letter’ published in 2004 under the name of Ken Livingstone together with the names of Helal Uddin Abbas and others from other local Councils, the promotion of CrossRail was made without a single qualification let alone reservation.
11. Khoodeelaar! immediately wrote to both Livingstone and demanded that the Evening Standard publish the truth about the CrossRail hole plan. Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque told the Editor of the London EVENING STANDARD that their failure to publish the truth about the CrossRail plan [as it still was - because the CrossRail hole Bill was not put before the House of Commons until 22 February 2005, almost a year after Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque was having the series of demands put on Ken Livingstone and Christine Gilbert to tell the truth of their then role in promoting the CrossRail plan. The EVENING STANDARD failed to publish the truth. As did Ken Livingstone.
12.
That was in February 2004.
13. Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque also wrote to Tower Hamlets Council chief Executive Christine Gilbert in February 2004 and in March 2004 asking for a series of detailed answers to questions about her own role in promoting the CrossRail hole plan including the question as to what advice, if any, had she, Christine Gilbert, given to the ruling clique or group on the Tower Hamlets Council. There was no reply. There has been no reply.
14. When Khoodeelaar! issued the latest then updated series of legal claims against Alistair Darling, ken Livingstone, Christine Gilbert and a few others and said that the application to the High Court in London against them would be filed on Monday 27 March 2006, a number of things immediately happened.
15. Ken Livingstone suddenly issued a news release on 24 March 2006 saying that the CrossRail Dirt hole in the Brick Lane London E1 had been scrapped!
16. And that Ken Livingstone Crossrail-Dirt-hole plan against Brick Lane London E1 area scrapping stunt announcement was then used as the peg for the evening TV news which featured the entire cabal of self-seeking politicos doing their fame slots and assorted other fantasies. They were given more time than khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque who did say on the record [BBC London News, Friday 24 April 2006] that as far as Khoodeelaar! was concerned, they had immediately asked Livingstone to substantiate the claims of the scrapping of the Crossrail Dirty hole plan and demanded that Livingstone to answer the outstanding detailed KHOODEELAAR! no to CrossRail hole questions that had been put to him as based on his unqualified plugs for the CrossRail plan over the previous years
17. Accordingly, Muhammad Haque and Khoodeelaar! campaign sent the detailed further questions immediately and also went to City hall on Monday 3 April 2006 and delivered a series of questions for Livingstone to deal with.
18. On the same occasion [3 April 2006] Khoodeelaar demonstrated the campaign’s opposition to Ken Livingstone's role so far and demanded that Livingstone come out with the overdue answers to the extensive and the very comprehensive KHOODEELAAR! No to the Crossrail hole questions which had arisen from Livingstone’s stunt staged on Friday 24 March 2006 about the alleged scrapping of the CrossRail Dirt hole.
19. Livingstone remained silent
20. Until the aadhikaronline news carried the first detailed transcripts of the Khoodeelaar! Organiser’s Questions and answers encounter with Conservative party chair Francis Maude in Brick Lane in the mid afternoon of Monday 24 April 2006.
21. Ken Livingstone’s head of Transports sent an e-mail which is full of typical Ken Livingstone's dissembling. The concept of dissembling as associated with ken Livingstone on 24 April 2006 had already been spotted and identified a month previously [on Friday 24 March 2006] out by Khoodeelaar organiser Muhammad Haque in his news interview with the BBC London political editor Tim Donovan on that date [Friday 24 March 2006].
What they said in Parliament on Wednesday 9 July 2008: How it all exposed the poverty of 'democratically elected' Parliament
THIS PAGE last edited at 0925 Hrs GMT London Thursday 10 july 2008
What they said in Parliament on Wednesday 9 July 2008: How it all exposed the poverty of 'democratically elected' Parliament
Coming here, Shortly.
What they said in Parliament on Wednesday 9 July 2008: How it all exposed the poverty of 'democratically elected' Parliament
Coming here, Shortly.
Tuesday, July 8, 2008
A source [see details in main post] 'discloses' that Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique has ABOLISHED the concept of 'official Opposition'...
By©Muhammad Haque
0212 Hrs GMT
London Wednesday 9 July 2008
The following has been obtained by AADHIKARonline research unit at appx 0200 Hrs GMT today Wednesday 9 July 2008 from a blog published by a former Conservative councillor who is based in Kent England UK. The reference to Tower Hamlets, Council is the reason for this being published by AADHIKARonline. The blogger is called Dan Hassett. We are publishing the following just for the record. AADHIKARonline will comment on the situation in Tower Hamlets as part of the continuing, ongoing, daily commentary.
"
The London Borough of Tower Hamlets has apparently
taken the bizarre step of abolishing the Official Opposition status,
because they were unhappy that the Conservatives were the opposition
after Respect collapsed on itself. They have now given the chief
scrutiny roles to their own councillors, and even have a Cabinet
member on the scrutiny committee. The Conservatives there rightly
refuse to take their seats on the committee in protest, but attend in an
individual role to oversee the committee.
"
[To be continued]
0212 Hrs GMT
London Wednesday 9 July 2008
The following has been obtained by AADHIKARonline research unit at appx 0200 Hrs GMT today Wednesday 9 July 2008 from a blog published by a former Conservative councillor who is based in Kent England UK. The reference to Tower Hamlets, Council is the reason for this being published by AADHIKARonline. The blogger is called Dan Hassett. We are publishing the following just for the record. AADHIKARonline will comment on the situation in Tower Hamlets as part of the continuing, ongoing, daily commentary.
"
The London Borough of Tower Hamlets has apparently
taken the bizarre step of abolishing the Official Opposition status,
because they were unhappy that the Conservatives were the opposition
after Respect collapsed on itself. They have now given the chief
scrutiny roles to their own councillors, and even have a Cabinet
member on the scrutiny committee. The Conservatives there rightly
refuse to take their seats on the committee in protest, but attend in an
individual role to oversee the committee.
"
[To be continued]
Monday, July 7, 2008
Crossrail hole plot Big Business agenda-peddling FT's relegation of Crossrail is followed up by a third construction propaganda outlet!
"
Plea for 'crucial' Thames Gateway Bridge
11:01 07 Jul 2008
By Roxanne Millar
Construction of the Thames Gateway Bridge is crucial for improving business around east London, according to firms in the area.
Almost half of companies polled say the bridge is the one scheme that would most benefit their trade and would be better for the bottom line than Crossrail.
The survey, by investment agency Gateway to London, found 48% enthusiastically backed the controversial scheme, which may never be built.
Only around 30% thought Crossrail would help them and 12% said the Channel Tunnel Rail Link would make a difference to their trade.
According to the Financial Times, transport is the biggest issue faced by respondents in the east end, who complain of difficulties with connectivity.
Mayor Boris Johnson has shown opposition to the Thames Gateway Bridge scheme, which he says has significant infrastructure issues.
There are currently no plans to proceed with it.'
"
Plea for 'crucial' Thames Gateway Bridge
11:01 07 Jul 2008
By Roxanne Millar
Construction of the Thames Gateway Bridge is crucial for improving business around east London, according to firms in the area.
Almost half of companies polled say the bridge is the one scheme that would most benefit their trade and would be better for the bottom line than Crossrail.
The survey, by investment agency Gateway to London, found 48% enthusiastically backed the controversial scheme, which may never be built.
Only around 30% thought Crossrail would help them and 12% said the Channel Tunnel Rail Link would make a difference to their trade.
According to the Financial Times, transport is the biggest issue faced by respondents in the east end, who complain of difficulties with connectivity.
Mayor Boris Johnson has shown opposition to the Thames Gateway Bridge scheme, which he says has significant infrastructure issues.
There are currently no plans to proceed with it.'
"
Sunday, July 6, 2008
'Team Boris' has just a few moments before he may find it too late- Boris has got to show higher morality than Livingstone ever had...
[Most of the following part is in fact written in response to the reported comments on the Ray Lewis events as attributed to former Conservative party leader and still serving MP in the UK House of Commons, Ian Duncan Smith. The MUHAMMAD HAQUE ethical commentary will continue after this part below. The initial comment in response to IDS has already appeared on the web site of the Walthamstow Guardian, dated 1215 Hrs UK Time today Sunday 6 July 2008. The version has been edited in relation to 3 words and one sentence]
By©Muhammad Haque
1130 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
6 July 2008
'Team Boris' has just a few moments before he may find it too late- Boris has got to show higher morality than Livingstone ever had...
By morality I mean higher probity. Higher ethics. Higher accountability. Higher standard all over. Now!
I would add to what Ian Duncan Smith says and say that the problem that the two resignations from Boris Johnson's’ entourage confirm is the absence of autonomous effective and serious thinking inside whoever constitute the ‘Team Boris’ now!
Secondly, IDS is correct to make the particular criticism of the mass propaganda media.
I entirely agree that none of those who have been damning ray Lewis would do anything really significant to save the kids and other young people.
I have been very aware of this.
And I knew, almost a year ago when Boris was being still rumoured to be the Conservative candidate, that he, Boris, would have to show a higher standard of morality and ethics than Ken Livingstone was showing. I
t was not a pleasant spectacle to see the BBC NEWSNIGHT programme wheel in Ken Livingstone to allegedly give the authoritative comment on the then unfolding ‘story’ around Ray Lewis.
What Living stone said was as insignificant, as irrelevant and as untrue on Thursday night as what Livingstone had said a few weeks before the 1 May 2008 London Assembly and mayor elections.
Livingstone has been allowed an irrationally unrigorously flaunted and allocated promotion and platform by the BBC. And what the BBC does is in effect aped and replicated by the rest of ‘Fleet Street’.
Yet the problems remain.
The BBC has not done one single investigative report on the institutions in London and in the rest of the UK that are fully funded, fully staffed and fully failing. No wonder that there is no solution in sight. Except sound bytes and media appearances.
We have in Britain a thoroughly corrupted set of institutions.
And after the devastating, corrupting of the institutions by Tony Blair in and across the UK, the tragedy for London people - and those youngsters and their families and loved ones is that London is left bereft of political representation.
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1130 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
6 July 2008
'Team Boris' has just a few moments before he may find it too late- Boris has got to show higher morality than Livingstone ever had...
By morality I mean higher probity. Higher ethics. Higher accountability. Higher standard all over. Now!
I would add to what Ian Duncan Smith says and say that the problem that the two resignations from Boris Johnson's’ entourage confirm is the absence of autonomous effective and serious thinking inside whoever constitute the ‘Team Boris’ now!
Secondly, IDS is correct to make the particular criticism of the mass propaganda media.
I entirely agree that none of those who have been damning ray Lewis would do anything really significant to save the kids and other young people.
I have been very aware of this.
And I knew, almost a year ago when Boris was being still rumoured to be the Conservative candidate, that he, Boris, would have to show a higher standard of morality and ethics than Ken Livingstone was showing. I
t was not a pleasant spectacle to see the BBC NEWSNIGHT programme wheel in Ken Livingstone to allegedly give the authoritative comment on the then unfolding ‘story’ around Ray Lewis.
What Living stone said was as insignificant, as irrelevant and as untrue on Thursday night as what Livingstone had said a few weeks before the 1 May 2008 London Assembly and mayor elections.
Livingstone has been allowed an irrationally unrigorously flaunted and allocated promotion and platform by the BBC. And what the BBC does is in effect aped and replicated by the rest of ‘Fleet Street’.
Yet the problems remain.
The BBC has not done one single investigative report on the institutions in London and in the rest of the UK that are fully funded, fully staffed and fully failing. No wonder that there is no solution in sight. Except sound bytes and media appearances.
We have in Britain a thoroughly corrupted set of institutions.
And after the devastating, corrupting of the institutions by Tony Blair in and across the UK, the tragedy for London people - and those youngsters and their families and loved ones is that London is left bereft of political representation.
[To be continued]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the 'Crossrail Bill' [a Bill in UK Parliament]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SGqe5VQwLHI/AAAAAAAABfc/MEjjMWby2dc/S226/Khoodeelaar!+try+this+logo.gif)
![London [Rupert Murdoched] Times, Wed. 7 May 2008](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SCIVsQ1wX-I/AAAAAAAAAs8/u1j4VZpbH0Y/S226/1676149.jpg)
