Crossrail hole plot agenda-promoting decision by Brown was wrong. As is his latest utterance

Crossrail hole plot agenda-promoting decision by Brown was wrong. As is his latest utterance... Before examining Brown’s utterances on the widespread incidents of mainly young people killing other young people across Britain and London, let us take another updated look at how wrong Gordon Brown can be... And then I shall detail,. why Brown should stop taking part in spin and lies.... And why he should start looking at the evidence of those in publicly paid for positions....posts and platforms


By©Muhammad Haque
1810 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 July 2008


When KHOODEELAAR! advised Gordon Brown in early 2004 that he should have nothing whatever to do with the then [yet to be a hybrid Bill-ed] Crassrail scam, we had done so on accurate information we had gathered about the UK Finance ministry's attitude towards the scheme. We had found out that Brown was not supportive of Crossrail because it was not economically justified.

We ourselves have said - and demonstrated the evidence supporting what we have said - all along that the uneconomic nature of the CRASSrail scam is one of its major minus points.

So when we learnt that Brown too was thinking the same way as we had been doing, we treated Brown with a different approach. we did not call him a crass chancellor. Far less an imprudent one. For the evidence available to us in 2004 was that Brown was doing what we would have wanted him to do: say No to CRASSrail.

That line from the UK’s Ministry of Finance [the ‘Treasury’] in effect continued upto even this time last year.

A year ago, in July 2007, the second ‘most influential treasury man’ [in effect the UK’s then deputy Finance minister] as they promoted Ed Balls, was giving out hints and noises that Crossrail would have to be supported otherwise than by public funding,...

That showed that Brown was still not backing Crossrail.


For Ed Balls was nothing if not an echo of Gordon Brown at the Treasury then.


On that evidence, we were logically and evidentially totally opposed to Brown’s NEXT act. That of making utterances just like those ignorant, dishonest and corrupt touts for Big Business had sounded for the years between say February 2004 and June 2007.

Brown was coming across as a fanatical believer in a cult of CROSSRAIL!

He was saying things that the corrupt lobby and City of London elements alone had been saying for the previous 18 months or so.

There was no prudence. No evidence for the new imprudence that Brown was uttering....

[To be continued]