By©Muhammad Haque
2258 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday 2 July 2008
We are daily showing, on the AADHIKARonline web pages, blogs and al,lied publications centring around the campaign against the London Crossrail hole plot just how alienated the controlling clique is from the community.
We are about to show that they are no longer just alienated. they are downright hostile.
They are hostile to the local community.
In this commentary, we show some of the current items of evidence that confirm that in betraying the community for the Big Business agenda of bankrupt economics identifiable with the corrupt City of London and whatever 'Canary Wharf' denotes, the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council has also committed a fundamental political self-destructive act...
One of the likely consequences of this will be seen between now and whenever the next elections take place for the Tower Hamlets Council...
How have they done so?
For a start, the numerical majority of the token, 'formal' decorations that are exhibited as being 'members' of the majority group on the Council are NOT in there making the decisions.
They are NOT even there to make any contributions. .
They are NOt capable of doing so.
This is not OPINION.
This is fact.
Secondly, those who do make the policy and then propel those through the formal 'members' are mostly NOT members.
They are NOT even employed, as such, in the Council. Or ‘by’ the Council.
Some of these are in fact agents of Big Business and their key role is to take over the agenda setting of the Council.
Thirdly, because the formal 'members' are NOt there to represent the community - they do not get to know the difference between representation and letting the constituency down.
Fourthly, we have a democratic vacuum. A deficit.
That void is being filled by the unaccountable, the unseen, the invisible elements that make the actual agenda, decide on what ‘needs to be done’ and what ‘needs to be avoided’.
A third component of their role is to also decide as to what ‘needs to be opposed’.
THEY have decided to apply the resources and the ‘powers’ of the Council in OPPOSING the people in the community. And in particular in opposing what is universally good, what is legitimate.
What is vital for the existence and the progress of the community. And the survival of the community.
This is the point at which the controlling clique decided to INVITE the Crossrail hole attacks upon the community.
Just like the decision to sabotage democracy by imposing an army of consultants who themselves form parts of the clique and aid and abet the clique in fomenting ever new sets and excuses for keeping the operation as corrupt and as unaccountable as they can manage to do --- the corrupt clique in control of Tower Hamlets Council has now ALMOST succeeded in making bit ‘the norm’ that the Council is a PRIVATE company unaccountable to the community.
This is why the clique has been so ferociously dishonest. There has been no .
It knows that ‘local ward councillors’ are not functioning as ward representatives
EVEN if, theoretically speaking, they WERE acting, for a length of a day, as ward councillors, they would not be able to sustain that intellectual position beyond a day. Why?
Because there is no constituency based, ward based political framework that is holding these ‘ward’ ‘councillors’ to account...
.
[To be continued]
Wednesday, July 2, 2008
Khoodeelaar! action against Crossrail hole AGENDA addresses ALL key aspects of life in inner city London and the EAST END of London...
We are daily showing, on the AADHIKARonline web pages, blogs and al,lied publications centring around the campaign against the London Crossrail hole plot just how alienated the controlling clique is from the community.
We are about to show that they are no longer just alienated. they are downright hostile.
They are hostile to the local community.
In this commentary, we show some of the current items of evidence that confirm that in betraying the community for the Big Business agenda of bankrupt economics identifiable with the corrupt City of London and whatever 'Canary Wharf' denotes, the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council has also committed a fundamental political self-destructive act...
One of the likely consequences of this will be seen between now and whenever the next elections take place for the Tower Hamlets Council...
How have they done so?
For a start, the numerical majority of the token, 'formal' decorations that are exhibited as being 'members' of the majority group on the Council are NOT in there making the decisions.
They are NOT even there to make any contributions. .
They are NOt capable of doing so.
This is not OPINION.
This is fact.
Secondly, those who do make the policy and then propel those through the formal 'members' are mostly NOT members.
They are NOT even employed, as such, in the Council. Or ‘by’ the Council.
Some of these are in fact agents of Big Business and their key role is to take over the agenda setting of the Council.
Thirdly, because the formal 'members' are NOt there to represent the community - they do not get to know the difference between representation and letting the constituency down.
Fourthly, we have a democratic vacuum. A deficit.
By©Muhammad Haque
2258 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday 2 July 2008
That void is being filled by the unaccountable, the unseen, the invisible elements that make the actual agenda, decide on what ‘needs to be done’ and what ‘needs to be avoided’.
A third component of their role is to also decide as to what ‘needs to be opposed’.
THEY have decided to apply the resources and the ‘powers’ of the Council in OPPOSING the people in the community. And in particular in opposing what is universally good, what is legitimate.
What is vital for the existence and the progress of the community. And the survival of the community.
This is the point at which the controlling clique decided to INVITE the Crossrail hole attacks upon the community.
Just like the decision to sabotage democracy by imposing an army of consultants who themselves form parts of the clique and aid and abet the clique in fomenting ever new sets and excuses for keeping the operation as corrupt and as unaccountable as they can manage to do --- the corrupt clique in control of Tower Hamlets Council has now ALMOST succeeded in making bit ‘the norm’ that the Council is a PRIVATE company unaccountable to the community.
This is why the clique has been so ferociously dishonest. There has been no .
It knows that ‘local ward councillors’ are not functioning as ward representatives
EVEN if, theoretically speaking, they WERE acting, for a length of a day, as ward councillors, they would not be able to sustain that intellectual position beyond a day. Why>? Because their is no constituency based, ward based political framework that is holding these ‘ward’ ‘councillors’ to account...
.
[To be continued]
We are about to show that they are no longer just alienated. they are downright hostile.
They are hostile to the local community.
In this commentary, we show some of the current items of evidence that confirm that in betraying the community for the Big Business agenda of bankrupt economics identifiable with the corrupt City of London and whatever 'Canary Wharf' denotes, the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council has also committed a fundamental political self-destructive act...
One of the likely consequences of this will be seen between now and whenever the next elections take place for the Tower Hamlets Council...
How have they done so?
For a start, the numerical majority of the token, 'formal' decorations that are exhibited as being 'members' of the majority group on the Council are NOT in there making the decisions.
They are NOT even there to make any contributions. .
They are NOt capable of doing so.
This is not OPINION.
This is fact.
Secondly, those who do make the policy and then propel those through the formal 'members' are mostly NOT members.
They are NOT even employed, as such, in the Council. Or ‘by’ the Council.
Some of these are in fact agents of Big Business and their key role is to take over the agenda setting of the Council.
Thirdly, because the formal 'members' are NOt there to represent the community - they do not get to know the difference between representation and letting the constituency down.
Fourthly, we have a democratic vacuum. A deficit.
By©Muhammad Haque
2258 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday 2 July 2008
That void is being filled by the unaccountable, the unseen, the invisible elements that make the actual agenda, decide on what ‘needs to be done’ and what ‘needs to be avoided’.
A third component of their role is to also decide as to what ‘needs to be opposed’.
THEY have decided to apply the resources and the ‘powers’ of the Council in OPPOSING the people in the community. And in particular in opposing what is universally good, what is legitimate.
What is vital for the existence and the progress of the community. And the survival of the community.
This is the point at which the controlling clique decided to INVITE the Crossrail hole attacks upon the community.
Just like the decision to sabotage democracy by imposing an army of consultants who themselves form parts of the clique and aid and abet the clique in fomenting ever new sets and excuses for keeping the operation as corrupt and as unaccountable as they can manage to do --- the corrupt clique in control of Tower Hamlets Council has now ALMOST succeeded in making bit ‘the norm’ that the Council is a PRIVATE company unaccountable to the community.
This is why the clique has been so ferociously dishonest. There has been no .
It knows that ‘local ward councillors’ are not functioning as ward representatives
EVEN if, theoretically speaking, they WERE acting, for a length of a day, as ward councillors, they would not be able to sustain that intellectual position beyond a day. Why>? Because their is no constituency based, ward based political framework that is holding these ‘ward’ ‘councillors’ to account...
.
[To be continued]
As London tribunal finds Tower Hamlets Council guilty, how many other cases DO exist of the Council's callousness?
CRASS act by Crossrail hole plot-inviting clique on Tower Hamlets Council, EXPOSED in a tribunal case verdict today...
The crassness of the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council is a theme that the Khoodeelaar! campaign against Crossrail hole plot has pointed out right from the start of our campaign in January 2004.
We have said that Tower Hamlets Council is controlled by a clique that is corrupt. That the Council has been in the corrupt clique's control for most of the time. That decisions made by the corrupt clique are by definition corrupt and or inappropriate and or wasteful;.
This we have said all along and despite the fact that the so-called ‘local’ newspaper, the East London IDIOTISER keeps claiming to be publishing accurate reports about the behaviour of the council when the truth is that the Idiotiser is suppressing the true behaviour of the clique. And of the totally plaint ‘opposition’.
The Conservatives are NOt being treated here as ‘Opposition’. More on the Tower Hamlets Council 'Conservatives' shortly.
Here we publish an item from 24.dash web site which is self explanatory:-
"
Council worker in line for £1 million pay out in pension claim battle
Published by Jon Land for 24dash.com
in Local Government
Wednesday 2nd July 2008 - 3:54pm
Email This Item
Email Address
ARTICLE TOOLS
Print
Email article
Comment
RSS
Atom
Share
TODAY IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Lambeth Council's mobile phone technology wins national award
Councils to get new powers to tackle tax rebels
Horrors of the Holocaust recalled on visit to Auschwitz
'Invest in under-fives' to reduce crime rates
Thousands of ballots 'miscounted' in London Mayoral election
Advertisement
Council worker in line for £1 million pay out in pension claim battle
A council worker made redundant six months before qualifying for a pension payout could receive £1 million compensation after victory at an employment tribunal today.
John Wooster, 50, from Chigwell, Essex, worked for Tower Hamlets council in east London for 33 years from the age of 16.
He was made redundant months before becoming eligible for a lump sum and pension payments.
Today Stratford Employment Tribunal found that he was unfairly dismissed and a victim of age discrimination.
Mr Wooster said: "This is a great victory. I really hope that this will stop the council from treating anyone else in the appalling way that it has treated me.
"I devoted 33 years of my working life to the council and it repaid me by dismissing me so that it would save money by not paying me my pension entitlements."
The council had claimed that Mr Wooster was a temporary employee while he worked as a senior consultation officer on secondment at East End Homes, a registered social landlord.
The firm offered to pay his salary until he reached the age of 50, but Tower Hamlets refused and he was dismissed on December 29 2006.
Solicitor Helen Murphie said: "Mr Wooster started work with the council when he was 16 and continued to work his way up the ladder until he was 49 and a half. Knowing that he would be entitled to his pension and a lump sum if he were made redundant upon reaching the age of 50, the council deliberately refused to redeploy him and dismissed him immediately."
Judge Pritchard-Witts said the tribunal had "no doubt" that it was Mr Wooster's age that had caused his dismissal.
Mr Wooster followed in the footsteps of his father, Tom, and grandfather, also John, in working for the council.
Wooster Gardens in Poplar, east London, are named after Mr Wooster's grandfather, who was once mayor of Poplar.
The 50-year-old is now claiming £1 million in compensation for loss of employment until his age of retirement at 65, loss of pension, and injury to feelings.
The amount he will be awarded will be decided at a later hearing.
"
The crassness of the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council is a theme that the Khoodeelaar! campaign against Crossrail hole plot has pointed out right from the start of our campaign in January 2004.
We have said that Tower Hamlets Council is controlled by a clique that is corrupt. That the Council has been in the corrupt clique's control for most of the time. That decisions made by the corrupt clique are by definition corrupt and or inappropriate and or wasteful;.
This we have said all along and despite the fact that the so-called ‘local’ newspaper, the East London IDIOTISER keeps claiming to be publishing accurate reports about the behaviour of the council when the truth is that the Idiotiser is suppressing the true behaviour of the clique. And of the totally plaint ‘opposition’.
The Conservatives are NOt being treated here as ‘Opposition’. More on the Tower Hamlets Council 'Conservatives' shortly.
Here we publish an item from 24.dash web site which is self explanatory:-
"
Council worker in line for £1 million pay out in pension claim battle
Published by Jon Land for 24dash.com
in Local Government
Wednesday 2nd July 2008 - 3:54pm
Email This Item
Email Address
ARTICLE TOOLS
Email article
Comment
RSS
Atom
Share
TODAY IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Lambeth Council's mobile phone technology wins national award
Councils to get new powers to tackle tax rebels
Horrors of the Holocaust recalled on visit to Auschwitz
'Invest in under-fives' to reduce crime rates
Thousands of ballots 'miscounted' in London Mayoral election
Advertisement
Council worker in line for £1 million pay out in pension claim battle
A council worker made redundant six months before qualifying for a pension payout could receive £1 million compensation after victory at an employment tribunal today.
John Wooster, 50, from Chigwell, Essex, worked for Tower Hamlets council in east London for 33 years from the age of 16.
He was made redundant months before becoming eligible for a lump sum and pension payments.
Today Stratford Employment Tribunal found that he was unfairly dismissed and a victim of age discrimination.
Mr Wooster said: "This is a great victory. I really hope that this will stop the council from treating anyone else in the appalling way that it has treated me.
"I devoted 33 years of my working life to the council and it repaid me by dismissing me so that it would save money by not paying me my pension entitlements."
The council had claimed that Mr Wooster was a temporary employee while he worked as a senior consultation officer on secondment at East End Homes, a registered social landlord.
The firm offered to pay his salary until he reached the age of 50, but Tower Hamlets refused and he was dismissed on December 29 2006.
Solicitor Helen Murphie said: "Mr Wooster started work with the council when he was 16 and continued to work his way up the ladder until he was 49 and a half. Knowing that he would be entitled to his pension and a lump sum if he were made redundant upon reaching the age of 50, the council deliberately refused to redeploy him and dismissed him immediately."
Judge Pritchard-Witts said the tribunal had "no doubt" that it was Mr Wooster's age that had caused his dismissal.
Mr Wooster followed in the footsteps of his father, Tom, and grandfather, also John, in working for the council.
Wooster Gardens in Poplar, east London, are named after Mr Wooster's grandfather, who was once mayor of Poplar.
The 50-year-old is now claiming £1 million in compensation for loss of employment until his age of retirement at 65, loss of pension, and injury to feelings.
The amount he will be awarded will be decided at a later hearing.
"
CRASS talk by Crossrail hole plot-tout Ken Livingstone must be ended with Brown SCRAPPING Crassrail NOW...
Crass talking, Crossrail hole plot-peddling 'Undone mayor' Ken Livingstone has not any basis to utter 'world class' before facing the crises now...!
By©Muhammad Haque
1750 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday 2 July 2008
If anyone was disposed to feel ‘sorry’ for Ken Livingstone at his defat on 1 May 2008, they must have now found out that any compassionate feeling of such solidarity would be highly inappropriate...
The man, as KHOODEELAAR! typically exclusive ely diagnosed and published his condition, was, had been, and remains highly egotistically challenged and psychologically destabilised...
It was Livingstone’;s psychological imbalance that had caused him to be so inappropriately closely and unaccountably involved in so many acts of abuse of public funds under the then over-hyped scams at the GLC.
Almost every day now, we are heating of incidents, acts, decisions, arrangements about the 2012 costs overruns... The escalating costs overruns and other faults including design faults and questions are going to get out of reasonable comprehensibility soon...
Just as Livingstone's ego is threatening to burst out of control....
So we say again, anyone who took any decision as based on ken Livingstone's ‘economic wisdom’ [ a more fundamental contradiction is not easy to imagine] especially Anyone near or even 'in' near No 10 Downing Street who might have allowed themselves to be tricked into Canary Wharf and make any announcements about Crossrail.. especially about FUNDING Crossrail to the tune f£ Billions with public money...... please revise such actions IMMEDIATELY....
[To be Continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1750 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday 2 July 2008
If anyone was disposed to feel ‘sorry’ for Ken Livingstone at his defat on 1 May 2008, they must have now found out that any compassionate feeling of such solidarity would be highly inappropriate...
The man, as KHOODEELAAR! typically exclusive ely diagnosed and published his condition, was, had been, and remains highly egotistically challenged and psychologically destabilised...
It was Livingstone’;s psychological imbalance that had caused him to be so inappropriately closely and unaccountably involved in so many acts of abuse of public funds under the then over-hyped scams at the GLC.
Almost every day now, we are heating of incidents, acts, decisions, arrangements about the 2012 costs overruns... The escalating costs overruns and other faults including design faults and questions are going to get out of reasonable comprehensibility soon...
Just as Livingstone's ego is threatening to burst out of control....
So we say again, anyone who took any decision as based on ken Livingstone's ‘economic wisdom’ [ a more fundamental contradiction is not easy to imagine] especially Anyone near or even 'in' near No 10 Downing Street who might have allowed themselves to be tricked into Canary Wharf and make any announcements about Crossrail.. especially about FUNDING Crossrail to the tune f£ Billions with public money...... please revise such actions IMMEDIATELY....
[To be Continued]
Does 'Supermum' Nicola Horlick have the courage to join Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crossrail hole plot to ADD to the poverty in the East End?
1140 Hrs GMT 1240 Hrs UK Time London Wednesday 2 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot' CAMPAIGN told you so! That the 'City of London' HAS KNOWINGLY devised successions of take-over and occupation scams so that it could remove the 'community' that exists in the area targeted by Crossrail hole attacks That some of the most high-profiled career-makers in the same 'City of London' KNOW of the dire, desperate destitution that exists in 'Tower Hamlets'.. This last part is what we are addressing in this edition, which we are starting with a quotation from Nicola Horlick...’the Supermum’...Who is quoted today by a City of London propaganda sheet as saying in an interview, ““Around the City are some of the poorest areas in London, and that juxtaposition just makes you think. If you live in Tower Hamlets your life expectancy is seven years shorter than if you live in Richmond – it drives you to want to do something.” ..
[To be continued]
[To be continued]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the 'Crossrail Bill' [a Bill in UK Parliament]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SGqe5VQwLHI/AAAAAAAABfc/MEjjMWby2dc/S226/Khoodeelaar!+try+this+logo.gif)
![London [Rupert Murdoched] Times, Wed. 7 May 2008](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SCIVsQ1wX-I/AAAAAAAAAs8/u1j4VZpbH0Y/S226/1676149.jpg)
