Crossrail hole Bill 'draft'-'writer' Tony McNulty now 'writes' to do away with civil liberties in Britain....

How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties 'minister' Tony McNulty?

the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....

By©Muhammad Haque
2045 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008

How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?

Why is this question being asked?

The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.

First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.

McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.

Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]

By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.

Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.

Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.

Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.

And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.

What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?

Because that was what he was saying!

Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.

Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.



Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.

No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.

In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.

Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].

No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.

McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.

I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….

Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.

It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.

He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.

The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’

McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.

And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.

Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.

It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.

This is worrying.

How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies belief…

[To be continued]

Crossrail hole Bill 'draft'-'writer' Tony McNulty now 'writes' to do away with civil liberties in Britain....

How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties 'minister' Tony McNulty?

the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....

By©Muhammad Haque
2045 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008

How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?

Why is this question being asked?

The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.

First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.

McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.

Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]

By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.

Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.

Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.

Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.

And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.

What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?

Because that was what he was saying!

Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.

Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.



Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.

No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.

In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.

Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].

No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.

McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.

I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….

Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.

It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.

He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.

The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’

McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.

And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.

Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.

It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.

This is worrying.

How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies believe…

[To be continued]

Boris Johnson has got to know what his Party Chair Francis Maude said AGAINST the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London

Boris Johnson has got to know what his Party Chair Francis Maude said AGAINST the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London

1320 GMT 1420 UK London Friday 11 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! action archive of the MUHAMMAD HAQUE interview of the then Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude [still an MP in the UK House fo Commons].on what he and his Part would say and o against the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End fo London The interview was conducted in Brick Lane London E1 and published in transcript in the same afternoon on Monday 24 April 2006....In the two years and two months since then, we have observed the behaviour of the Conservative Party in the UK Parliament,.. An updater commentary on that will appear here soon. First the interview with Francis Maude [see below] [To be continued]



AADHIKARonline transcript of the question and answer between Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque and Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude, in Brick Lane London E1 at 1210 Hrs appx GMT on Monday 24 April 2006

Transcript posted on aadhikaronline web pages at 1345 Hrs GMT Monday 24 April 2006

1. Muhammad Haque [Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 area No to Crossrail hole Bill] : Hello can I ask you a Question from Khoodeelaar?
Francis Maude: Yes. Do.
2. Muhammad Haque: [Khoodeelaar is] the Campaign against Crossrail hole [in the Brick Lane London E1 area]
3. Muhammad Haque What would you say is your Party’s position?
Francis Maude: Well, we’re very much in favour of CrossRail… which we think can deliver very serious benefits to the area but we’re concerned that there shouldn’t be [slight stammer] all of the digging up of [slight stammer] the [Brick Lane London E1 ] area to make it happen, We don’t see that it’s necessary.
4. Muhammad Haque: Do you believe Alistair Darling's
Francis Maude: No
5. Muhammad Haque: [UK Transport Secretary – the Crossrail hole Minister] Alistair Darling’s statement, said in a written statement on 30 March [2006] what do you say to that?
Francis Maude: No. You see that’s simply pre-election [hesitation]] manoeuvring. I wouldn't trust anything he [Alistair Darling] says.
6. .Muhammad Haque: Are you going to take it up as a formal motion against his
Francis Maude: my colleagues are. My colleagues will be. Thank you very much.
7 Muhammad Haque: When do you expect to do that?
Francis Maude: Well, very soon.
”

KHOODEELAAR! exposé of the emptiness of Crossrail lobby-man Francis Salway also shows way out for Gordon Brown....

This page of AADHIKARonline was last edited at 1212GMT Fri 11.07.2008

You quote Francis salway as saying about Crossrail:
"The key bit was about London’s contribution to GDP, its share in the growth of exports and how a strong London leads to growth outside the capital. We were able to show how many businesses that had set up in London went on to open offices outside the city. It was an example of how getting facts can help with lobbying.’ "

It is to be noted that there is no reference to the transport needs of London people. There is no reference to the severe income disparity that exists between every two parts of central London. There is no reference to the severely persistent jobless rates in ALL London boroughs. There is no mention of the English regions in the context of the economic performance of the UK as a whole. No comparative or even basic recognition of the human resources that are wasted by bad management and poor maintenance of existing transport infrastructure in London, in the suburbs and in the regions... So what Francis Salway did was to LOBBY. Pure and simple. No evidence needed to justify the allocation of £Billions of public money to a scam that was NOT recommended in the report authored in the name of Rod Eddington. The two ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committees’ in the two Houses of the UK parliament were either barred from receiving evidence showing up the shallowness and overwhelming irrelevance and wastefulness of Crossrail or were too callously constituted and stooged themselves to seek such evidence from interested parties and objectors. If Gordon Brown is going to be liable for wasting £Billions on Crossrail then at least on this one, he will know who conned him and tricked him into doing so. We say even at this stage, Gordon Brown and the UK economy will be better off scrapping the crassly conceived London Crossrail scam.

KHOODEELAAR! expose of the emptiness of Crossrail lobby-man Francis Salway also shows way out for Gordon Brown....

You quote Francis salway as saying about Crossrail:

"The key bit was about London’s contribution to GDP, its share in the growth of exports and how a strong London leads to growth outside the capital. We were able to show how many businesses that had set up in London went on to open offices outside the city. It was an example of how getting facts can help with lobbying.’ "


It is to be noted that there is no reference to the transport needs of London people.
There is no reference to the severe income disparity that exists between every two parts of central London.
There is no reference to the severely persistent jobless rates in ALL London boroughs.
There is no mention of the English regions in the context of the economic performance of the UK as a whole.
No comparative or even basic recognition of the human resources that are wasted by bad management and poor maintenance of existing transport infrastructure in London, in the suburbs and in the regions...
So what Francis Salway did was to LOBBY. Pure and simple.
No evidence needed to justify the allocation of £Billions of public money to a scam that was NOT recommended in the report authored in the name of Rod Eddington.
The two ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committees’ in the two Houses of the UK parliament were either barred from receiving evidence showing up the shallowness and overwhelming irrelevance and wastefulness of Crossrail or were too callously constituted and stooged themselves to seek such evidence from interested parties and objectors. If Gordon Brown is going to be liable for wasting £Billions on Crossrail then at least on this one, he will know who conned him and tricked him into doing so. We say even at this stage, Gordon Brown and the UK economy will be better off scrapping the crassly conceived London Crossrail scam.
KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business CRASSrail hole scam

Boris Johnson has got to know what his Party Chair Francis Maude said AGAINST the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London

This AADHIKARonline page was last edited at 1320 Hrs GMT London Friday 11 July 2008

1320 GMT 1420 UK London Friday 11 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! action archive of the MUHAMMAD HAQUE interview of the then Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude [still an MP in the UK House fo Commons].on what he and his Part would say and o against the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End fo London The interview was conducted in Brick Lane London E1 and published in transcript in the same afternoon on Monday 24 April 2006....In the two years and two months since then, we have observed the behaviour of the Conservative Party in the UK Parliament,.. An updater commentary on that will appear here soon. First the interview with Francis Maude [see below] [To be continued]



AADHIKARonline transcript of the question and answer between Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque and Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude, in Brick Lane London E1 at 1210 Hrs appx GMT on Monday 24 April 2006

Transcript posted on aadhikaronline web pages at 1345 Hrs GMT Monday 24 April 2006

1. Muhammad Haque [Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 area No to Crossrail hole Bill] : Hello can I ask you a Question from Khoodeelaar?
Francis Maude: Yes. Do.
2. Muhammad Haque: [Khoodeelaar is] the Campaign against Crossrail hole [in the Brick Lane London E1 area]
3. Muhammad Haque What would you say is your Party’s position?
Francis Maude: Well, we’re very much in favour of CrossRail… which we think can deliver very serious benefits to the area but we’re concerned that there shouldn’t be [slight stammer] all of the digging up of [slight stammer] the [Brick Lane London E1 ] area to make it happen, We don’t see that it’s necessary.
4. Muhammad Haque: Do you believe Alistair Darling's
Francis Maude: No
5. Muhammad Haque: [UK Transport Secretary – the Crossrail hole Minister] Alistair Darling’s statement, said in a written statement on 30 March [2006] what do you say to that?
Francis Maude: No. You see that’s simply pre-election [hesitation]] manoeuvring. I wouldn't trust anything he [Alistair Darling] says.
6. .Muhammad Haque: Are you going to take it up as a formal motion against his
Francis Maude: my colleagues are. My colleagues will be. Thank you very much.
7 Muhammad Haque: When do you expect to do that?
Francis Maude: Well, very soon.
”

Crossrail 'lobby' man confesses to in effect having conned Gordon Brown to commit £Billions of public money...

This page of AADHIKARonline was last edited at 0955 GMT 11 July 2008


0950 GMT 1050 UKTime London Friday 11 July 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘CRASSness, dishonesty, abuse of public funds for Big Business agenda crossrail hole Plot...” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! THAT just as Ken Livingstone has confessed to having LIED to get the diversionary, uneconomic, socially divisive and degenerating = deprivation-creating [contrary to his double-whammy lying confession] public funding for the 2012 Olympic Games hosting stunt [that has been spiralling out of all limits in cost overruns] so have they LIED to get Gordon Brown to commit £Billions to the Big Business Crossrail hole plot..... This is in effect admitted by Francis Salway, one of those involved in the elaborate fabrication of the ‘Crossrail lobby’ ...Salway’ admission again shows that CROSSRAIL is indeed CRASS... That it has lacked substance and merit from the start and that they have been faking, fabricating, making up to peddle it ,, and that the only main beneficiary will be the Big Business behind the construction scams.... Crossrail is NOT about addressing transport needs of Lon don at all... This is exposed in the banal admissions by Francis Salway as published today.


[To be continued]

Fact-based lies for CRASSrail lobby confession by Francis Salway confirms what we have said all along:

This page of AADHIKARonline last edited at 0930 GMT Fri 11.07.2008

That they lied and fabricated to 'make the case for Crossrail' and to get Gordon Brown to make the public money to the tune of £Billions, is in effect admitted in a propaganda item published today.

More, here, shortly