1240 Hrs GMT 1340 Hrs UKTime London Monday 2 June 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot' CAMPAIGN is also against the ADDING of poverty, deprivation to the community of ordinary people in the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets...
The KHOODEELAAR! campaign has said that the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council has been and remains guilt of a seriously antisocial and corrupting lie in that it equates poverty with 'regeneration'.. Khoodeelaar! has therefor described Tower Hamlets Council as a degenerating Council... Over decades, Tower Hamlets Council has let the community down, by institutionally, organisationally, managerially and wrongly and wrongfully 'praising' the causers and the perpetrators of underachievement, dis-education and mis-edcucaton....
Monday, June 2, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot' CAMPAIGN is also against the ADDING of poverty, deprivation to the community of ordinary East End..
1240 Hrs GMT 1340 Hrs UKTime London Monday 2 June 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot' CAMPAIGN is also against the ADDING of poverty, deprivation to the community of ordinary people in the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets...
The KHOODEELAAR! campaign has said that the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council has been and remains guilt of a seriously antisocial and corrupting lie in that it equates poverty with 'regeneration'.. Khoodeelaar! has therefor described Tower Hamlets Council as a degenerating Council... Over decades, Tower Hamlets Council has let the community down, by institutionally, organsiatonally, mangerially and wrongly and wrongfully 'praising' the causers and the perpetrators of underachievement, dis-education and mis-edcucaton....
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot' CAMPAIGN is also against the ADDING of poverty, deprivation to the community of ordinary people in the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets...
The KHOODEELAAR! campaign has said that the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council has been and remains guilt of a seriously antisocial and corrupting lie in that it equates poverty with 'regeneration'.. Khoodeelaar! has therefor described Tower Hamlets Council as a degenerating Council... Over decades, Tower Hamlets Council has let the community down, by institutionally, organsiatonally, mangerially and wrongly and wrongfully 'praising' the causers and the perpetrators of underachievement, dis-education and mis-edcucaton....
Khoodeelaar! says No to Crossrail hole AGENDA because that agenda is to make East End people poorer.....
By©Muhammad Haque
1220 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 2 June 2008
The poverty that dominates the evidence about the East End of London has been in the main CREATED poverty. As all poverty is. But in the case of inner city East End of London, POVERTY HAS BEEN CREATED.
As poverty is about human beings, the human beings that make up the community in ordinary East End have been treated by the controlling forces in the economy with contempt.
The result has been that in the 'schools' and other 'institutions of education', there has been DEFICIT EDUCATION. Rather than positive education, the schools in Tower Hamlets have been the sources of DEFICIT education. In other words, they have ADDED to the negative human p[profiles of the vast majority of their 'students' across DECADES.
This has created the mainly underachieving, under-schooled, non-educated parts in the population that has been also denied the access to activities that would provide decent sustained incomes...
Like the man, a Bangladeshi one, who has been seen to be asking for money from passers-by on the Whitechapel Road... Those who know him also know his age and his history... He is known to spend the money on alcohol...
A more stark reality would be hard to imagine in the East End...
Why?
Because everyone knows that alcoholism is a road to self destruction... And the destruction of all around the person......
And everyone also knows that 'culturally, Bangladeshis are a million miles away from anything to do with alcohol'.
Or are they ?
And how could Bangladeshis get to be alcoholics in the East End of London? Or in any other part of London or the UK!!!
This is the question that is linked with our examination of the many ';benefits' that the pluggers of Crossrail hoe,attacks peddle....
They say that 'Crossrail would bring benefits to the East End'.
They don't mean benefits that are rationally described...
They mean distorted benefits. In fact they mean deficits that destroy the person. The community...
[To be continued]
1220 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 2 June 2008
The poverty that dominates the evidence about the East End of London has been in the main CREATED poverty. As all poverty is. But in the case of inner city East End of London, POVERTY HAS BEEN CREATED.
As poverty is about human beings, the human beings that make up the community in ordinary East End have been treated by the controlling forces in the economy with contempt.
The result has been that in the 'schools' and other 'institutions of education', there has been DEFICIT EDUCATION. Rather than positive education, the schools in Tower Hamlets have been the sources of DEFICIT education. In other words, they have ADDED to the negative human p[profiles of the vast majority of their 'students' across DECADES.
This has created the mainly underachieving, under-schooled, non-educated parts in the population that has been also denied the access to activities that would provide decent sustained incomes...
Like the man, a Bangladeshi one, who has been seen to be asking for money from passers-by on the Whitechapel Road... Those who know him also know his age and his history... He is known to spend the money on alcohol...
A more stark reality would be hard to imagine in the East End...
Why?
Because everyone knows that alcoholism is a road to self destruction... And the destruction of all around the person......
And everyone also knows that 'culturally, Bangladeshis are a million miles away from anything to do with alcohol'.
Or are they ?
And how could Bangladeshis get to be alcoholics in the East End of London? Or in any other part of London or the UK!!!
This is the question that is linked with our examination of the many ';benefits' that the pluggers of Crossrail hoe,attacks peddle....
They say that 'Crossrail would bring benefits to the East End'.
They don't mean benefits that are rationally described...
They mean distorted benefits. In fact they mean deficits that destroy the person. The community...
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole plot is also NO to ADDING NEW poverty to the East End of London....
AADHIKARonline is published 24/7 by the AADHIKAR Media Foundation in association with and in support of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail hole plot [as contained din ‘hybrid’ ‘Crossrail Bill’, a draft piece of legislation which has been crassly promoted by the Blair administration under the influence fo Big Business... That ‘Bill’ is now in the legislative UK House of Lords, where it is being allowed to pass the stages of scrutiny without scrutiny!][the plot, as contained in and typified by the ‘hybrid’ ‘Crossrail Bill’ now in the UK ‘legislative’ ‘House of Lords’ as the crassly conceived ‘Crossrail Bill’]
Editor©Muhammad Haque
1155 GMT Monday 2 June 2008
The 4th edition of the day 1155 MT Monday 2 June 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill; Khoodeelaar! the campaign in defence of the economic, social, human rights of the people in the East End of London and the campaign against the abuse of the public positions and the public resources by the seekers of or the occupants in the publicly paid for posts and positions in the name of the people of the East End of Lon don... Khoodeelaar! the No to 'Crossrail hole Bill' CAMPAIGN from the Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area
The KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business Crossrail hole agenda is also the campaign against creation of new poverty in the inner city East End of London.... More HERE shortly
LINES OF HUNGER FROM INNER CITY Blaired Britain - updating the 'Lines of Hunger from bangladesh' first written and published by Muhammad Haque in May 1991...... Updates have been rescheduled and will appear here in the week starting on Monday 2 June 2008
On Sunday 22 January 2006, at a Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN meeting held at the 'Brady Centre', 192 Hanbury Street, London E1, the KHOODEELAAR! campaign organiser gave the key note speech about the campaign. In the speech, he also stated, extempore, the core of a motion that the meeting unanimously supported DEMANDING that the local Tower Hamlets Council passed a full Council motion saying ‘No to the Crossrail hole Bill’.
Two years 4 months have passed since that time and the Khoodeelaar! campaign has been renewing the same demand to the Council. The Tower Hamlets Council has not passed that motion. The community has not been respected by Tower Hamlets Council on this issue. Yet the 'councillors' who attended that meeting have remained on the same Council claiming to represent the community that is affected by the Crossrail hole plot..... So what is the secret? Is it in any way to do with any ambiguity about what was said in the Khoodeelaar! campaign demand as passed by the meeting held on 22 january 2006? There could be no ambiguity. Just for the records, we again publish the main text of the KHOODEELAAR! legal action process service communication about the demand that was sent to the then 'chief executive' in the Tower Hamlets Borough COUNCIL , Christine Gilbert on 25 january 2006.
By©Muhammad Haque .....
Wednesday 25 January 2006
To
Christine Gilbert
Chief Executive
And
Owen Whalley
Head of Major Project Development
London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council
Mulberry Place
5 Clove Crescent
London E14 2BG
Dear Ms Gilbert and Mr Whalley
Subject Khoodeelaar campaign meeting –
Demand 22 January 2006 –
The texts [2] sent by fax 25 Jan 2006
1. You both have been sent this morning the main texts of the KHOODEELAAR!
campaign resolution as delivered and agreed at the meeting on 22 January 2006 held [at the Brady centre, 192 Hanbury street London E1] in the evening of Sunday 22 January 2006 demanding that the London borough of tower hamlets council pass a single motion as their resolution against the Crossrail hole plan/bill as it is in the uk house of commons now and that they do so in the next 11 days and that the resolution be put to the uk parliament and to the uk secretary of state transport department [Department for Transport= ‘DfT’] and that the resolution be phrased and drafted in an unambiguous unequivocal way accurately truthfully reflecting and representing the demand of the community.
2. Mr Owen Whalley has been sent the copy – and is being sent this further amplifier and clarifier – because of the central role he has been playing (as the published documents of the LBTH council suggest) in the promotion of the Crossrail hole scheme/project/bill as far as the ‘development’ of the Crossrail ‘project’ for the LBTH council goes. He has been sent the material also in order for him to be in receipt of what the community has demanded and what he as the designated employee on ‘Crossrail’ in the LBTH council has to do so that the community’s lawful and urgent demand is seen to be recognised and implemented by the relevant employees in the council on every relevant occasion.
3. As the same campaign meeting [22 January 2006] also agreed the taking of legal action in the event that tower hamlets council fail to implement the demand, you both are most certainly going to be included as parties in any such action and so you are being sent this in our voluntary compliance with the requirements of natural justice, due process [and other related concepts] and the civil procedure rules.
4. The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in defence of the BRICK LANE London E1 AREA and against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project/bill is able to confirm to you both today Wednesday 25 January 2006 that we shall include additional demands for the very detailed legal and democratic and economic accountability from the council over any additional costs that tower hamlets council is caused to be embroiled in or involved in or engaged in - whether in any further attempt/s on the parts of those who have access to the finances and the ‘powers’ and the contacts of the London borough of tower hamlets council to justify their roles and their promotions of the Crossrail hole project or in any further unreasonable, irresponsible, improper, undemocratic, antisocial and or ill-conceived egotistic bid/s in defiance of the very clearly expressed demands of the local community and or in defiance of the campaigning organisations representing the fears, needs and demands of the local community against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project/bill and you both shall be included in any list of witnesses who will be asked to give evidence on their own roles and the origins of any orders or decisions that caused them to play the parts that you found yourselves playing in defiance of the local community’s clear demand against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project Bill. 5. Ms Christine Gilbert has been put on notice since the first quarter of 2004 when the chair of the CBRUK organisation (which politically organised the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign during that same period in 2004) initiated the first series of extensive questions which were drafted and put to her concerning the role she had played in advising and or working with or in carrying out the actual intentions of any controlling group member of the LBTH council on the Crossrail hole scheme/project/scheme. She has failed to date to deal with those questions and despite two recent [final] reminders has continued to fail or refuse to answer the outstanding questions. She has also failed to provide any lawful or reasonable explanation or lawful justification for her conduct and role concerned in the context of the KHOODEELAAR campaign demands, questions and representations.
6. The statements that have been published in the past two weeks in the name of or by the uses and abuses of the LBTH council as the corporate entity and about the Crossrail hole bill have contained more than one contradictory assertion and allusion to alleged facts thus creating new grounds for the community to be able to claim that ‘the TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL’ in general and the identifiable ‘controlling group’ councillors are carrying on conducting themselves in defiance of or in conflict with the wishes and the interests of the local community concerned.
7. The KHOODEELAAR campaign is able to confirm to both ms Christine Gilbert and Mr Owen Whalley that this communication dated and transmitted on Wednesday 25 January 2006 is being made to both of them as a very last attempt at helping the controlling persons involved in the LBTH council over the Crossrail hole scheme/project/ bill avoid placing or pushing the corporate entity of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council and its resources in a very costly confrontation with the community in the East End
8. Mr Owen Whalley’s circular ‘to all members’ of the TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL dated 19 September 2005 contains a misleading statement that is of crucial relevance to us and which statement as put to the meeting of 22 January 2006 and was loudly and clearly rejected by the meeting. That statement is in the last sentence in paragraph two of the circular (‘the petition also makes explicit the council’s opposition to an intervention shaft in Hanbury Street and preference for its relocation to Woodseer Street’.)
9. The meaning of the phrase ‘misleading statement’ in this context is any statement that contradicts the community’s opposition to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail hole, to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail shaft tunnel, to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail hole in THE BRICK LANE London E1 AREA and in any other part of THE London BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS. This is the position as expressed by the public meeting in support of the Khoodeelaar campaign held at the Brady centre on Sunday 22 January 2006. This takes into account the KHOODEELAAR CAMPAIGN'S remit which recognises the rights of the people in the Mile End area that is also affected by the known Crossrail plans.
10. The KHOODEELAAR campaign is able to confirm that it will treat this document and communication [25 January 2006] as being a reasonable final comprehensive advice, notice and representation to the two most relevant employees in the LBTH council of the community’s simple and straightforward demand and position on the role of the LBTH Council in the matter of the Crossrail hole project/scheme/ Bill and of the task that the community has asked the LBTH Council to carry out within the specified time by passing the resolution and then making the same resolution available to the MPs select committee currently sitting to formally consider the relevant aspects of the Crossrail hole Bill [‘the Crossrail Bill’ or the ‘Crossrail hybrid Bill’] in time so that there is no frustration of the community’s wish in the remainder of the process of legislation involved.
KHOODEELAAR campaign demand 22 January 2006 and follow-up legal notice to Christine Gilbert and Owen Whalley concluded at 1436 HRS GMT on Wednesday 25 January 2006
AADHIKARonline campaign news commentary against Crossrail hole agenda...1510 Hrs GMT 1610 Hrs UK Time London Friday 30 May 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot UPDATE on Friday 30 May 2008 shows up the charade that is the UK Houses of Parliament..... As seen in the willing servility to the executive as exhibited in the behaviour of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ ‘select committee ‘ fronted by the place man Alan Meale and his ‘opposition’ [what ‘opposition’] place men and place women .... As Khoodeelaar! had predicted in December 2005, within hours of the announcement being made that a ‘select committee’ had been set up, there was no chance in a million years that the ‘select committee’ would allow the evidence against Crossrail to be put on the record before the committee. As we also correctly predicted, the ‘ Crossrail Bill’ ‘select committee’ in the UK House of Commons that had just been announced [December 2005] would behave like a stooge committee. As it in fact did. And we then predicted, in November 2007 when we first became directly involved in communications wit the part of the ‘House of Lords’ concerned with the ‘Crossrail Bill’] that UNLESS some members of the ‘House of Lords’ [what an affront to all of us who do not consider any human being to be worthy of being called a lord!] showed by their conduct that they UNDERSTOOD what the duties of a constitutionally active legislative Upper chamber of a democratic and accountable Parliament had to do and UNLESS they did accordingly and constitutionally and unless they behaved in manifestly honest, intellectually competent, ethically transparent, objectively independent way,,, they would discredit the ‘case for the House of Lords’... We went on to give them support, encouragement and advice... We did so in our direct communications as addressed to the bureaucracy set up ‘ within the House of Lords’ for the purpose of ‘the formal treatment of the Crossrail Bill’. As we did in published comments including in those carried in particular on the Times newspaper web site.... And we did so for the simple purpose of backing the movement for democracy in the UK, the movement for accountability in and via Parliament to the people, and in the particular case on the CRASSLY conceived, Big Business-agenda Crossrail scam. And we called for an end to the wasteful plot via Crossrail that was just afoot.... in the ‘Upper House’, ‘ via’ the ‘Upper House’..... We also examined the history of the ‘House of Lords’.. and we referred to Oliver Cromwell... and said that so dire, so empty, so barren has been the field of formally instituted opposition in and via parliament in britain that we looked in vain over records of centuries to find any significant acton that was taken to bring the illegitimate elements that made up the ‘House of Lords’ to book.... as it were... We did all of this in order to tell the servile time servers that we were NOT impressed by their records generally and that unless they showed they were willing to tell the truth about the people’s serious objections against Crossrail they, the ‘House of Lords’ members concerned would go down as contributing yet more to discredit the already largely illegitimate and discredited ‘House’.. And so they have done..... [To be continued]
AADHIKARonline bringing the Muhammad Haque daily commentary on the poverty of Blaired Britain now fronted b y Gordon Brown; and focussing this weekend on the extravagant poverty of David Cameron and his colluders who are insulting the remaining intelligence of the people in the UK........Ca-monroin evidently is operating on the assumption that the Tory violence by poverty creation and poverty-perpetration is all acceptable now... and that with the likes of Frank the Benefit Fraudsters from Merseyside die [who is being given obscene accolades, in fact for his role in undermining Gordon Brown’s tottering reputation...] ... The facts must be separated daily from the lies that Thatcher’s revivalist gang led by Ca-Moron is going to make legitimate and acceptable..... The agenda that Crossrail hole plot is part of is the same agenda that Margaret Thatcher, Norman Tebbit, Tony Blair have supported and operated and the agenda that Gordon Brown was lured by Ken Livingstone into backing in a brazenly imprudent way in September/October 2007..... And the agenda that is being revived by Ca-Moron conservatives who are faking it... as they dress up as caring, concerned conservatives... They are nothing the sort... They care only for their opportunity to get into power and smash society to bits... society that Thatcher violated and society that Thatcher was smashing up when she was given the farewell........ That agenda is bad for the people in the inner cities... That agenda is bad for the people elsewhere in the uK..... Opposing the thinking behind that agenda is the first task.... Read more here daily
View HERE the latest Muhammad Haque daily commentary on the Gordon Brown-fronted Blaired regime in the UK ...
Also the latest KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘Crossrail hole plot’ CAMPAIGN news and constitutional law analyses are accessible via this web site. This site carries the updates and summaries on the Khoodeelaar! Constitutional Law Opposition to the Î hybrid and the Big Business-prompted "Crossrail Bill" which is now [at 25 May 2008] being given the formal and the illegitimate and the unconstitutional seal of approval by the stooged and the staged and the undemocratic, the unaccountable, the unethically-controlled and the illegitimate agenda-seeking ‘Select Committee’ set up in UK legislative House of Lords under the actual influence and for the benefit [=profit to the tunes of £Billions of money that would be forced out of the UK public] of Big Business influences, elements, agencies, lobbys represented by the front-line Military Industrial Complex operations as typified by the USA conglomerate Bechtel....
KHOODEELAAR! commentary on Crossrail hole plot-peddling Chris Grayling’s latest pack of lies against the people pushed into poverty in the UK - we show up the crassness of Crossrail hole-plot-backer Chris Grayling in a series of comments due to start today Tuesday 27 May 2008
By©Muhammad Haque
1454 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 28 May 2008
What is the evidence that justifies the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council DESCRIBING the controlling clique as corrupt?
There is not just one piece of evidence. There are countless items of evidence. The sum of the evidence both shows that the clique is engaged in wrong conduct about Crossrail. And that it is also engaged in wrong conduct about the overall, the general duties it has towards the people in the Borough of Tower Hamlets about other aspects of life that relate to the duties of a local council.
One of the persistent patterns of the lying behaviour by the corrupt clique on the Tower Hamlets 'locally elected' [!!!!!!!] Council has been their refusal to observe basic standards of ethics and behaviour. Ethics and standards of behaviour that on paper any 'locally elected council' 'administration' would be expected to practise and respect.
And how deep, complete, has been the evidence of the Tower Hamlets Council’s wrong and wrongful behaviour?
As deep as the numbers of years over which the clique has been in control. As deep as the particulars and as extensive as the details of the claque’s collusion with Big Business proponents who have got in league with the Tower ~Hamlets Council with the aim of taking over the land and the spaces in the East End of London under covers of plausible projects but in reality for the benefit of Big Business And to benefit the City of London-linked exploiters at the expense of the people of the East End of London the ordinary population in the borough in the end.
This is seen in the dishonest behaviour of the clique that was fronted by Christine Gilbert at the time.
Gilbert as chief executive in the Council made a most untrue assertion about the actual policy of the clique on Crossrail.
This concerned the so-called cabinet meeting of 6 October 2004.
The Khoodeelaar! campaign observed the meeting and it was clear that the community’s serious opposition to the Council’s collusion with the Crossrail scam [it was not a Bill in Parliament yet - that took place nearly 4 months later] was being sidelined by the clique.
So the Khoodeelaar! campaign organised for the relevant aspect of the community's questions to be put to Christine Gilbert in the context of the clique's conduct.
It was never expected that Gilbert would come out with an admission that her clique was in the wrong. Or that the clique had let the community down.
But it was essential for the purpose of extensive evidential processing of her conduct that she was given the opportunity to come clean and admit that her clique had indeed been in the wrong.
Regardless of the actual final position Gilbert would take on the subject under reference, it was expected that she should show normal courtesy and behave in accordance with the rules that require the ‘chief officer’ of the local council to properly and timely acknowledge communications she received.
What did Gilbert do?
Did she behave in accordance with the standards expected of the town clerk?
She behaved with undue delay.
She pretended that she had not received the communications containing the questions.
Was that exceptional?
The answer, on the facts, is that NO.
CHRISTINE Gilbert behaved with the same prejudice and with the same lack of accountability towards the whole population in Tower Hamlets that had been the feature of the Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique for decades.
That is why the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has had to establish new criteria so that the history of neglect as shown by the ‘elected’ local council to the people in whose name the council is ‘elected’ is not repeated. That the people are offered accountable representation by the ‘elected’ council.
That was the only way in which the community’s interests could be defended.
That was the only way that the Crossrail hole attacks could be stopped.
Christine Gilbert behaved with no regard for the constitutional duties of the local Council. She behaved opportunistically and on the assumption that there would no ‘issue made on the floor of the council’ by any of the ‘elected members on the 'Tower Hamlets Council'’.
She showed no recognition of the fact that her conduct, her role and the implications of her conduct and of her role could indeed be challenged in court.
Or did she think that the Khoodeelaar! campaign notes to her and to her clique saying that a time would come when their abuse of power and their collusion with the agenda of the Big Business would be challenged in court was not part of the real programme of action ?
How similar was Christine Gilbert’s disrespect to the ordinary codes of ethical, unaccountable behaviour to the disrespect shown to ethics, morality and the norms of constitutionality by the bureaucracy set up in the name of the ‘House of Lords’ that has been in fact peddling the Crossrail hole plotting agenda desired by Big Business, a la Bechtel of USA ? [To be continued]
AADHIKAR Media Foundation, a wholly non-profit, non-commercial media service that is publishing the KHOODEELAAR! campaign and information materials on the internet for the advancement of understanding in the cause eo f establishing human rights by economic and social justice in the UK inner city areas and for the dissemination of the lessons learnt in the struggles against Big Business and their stooged regimes that Blairing typifies.... The apparent dissemination of the Gordon Brown fronted Blaired regime in the UK is not to be confused with the overdue disintegration of the corrupt and the undemocratic 'system'... By the looks of things at 0830 "system" GMT in London on [Bank holiday] 26 May 2008, David "Ca-Moron" has NOT been given the actual go-ahead to proclaim that he is already 'home and dry' [Electorally speaking] as the next manager of the Capitalist Imperialist enterprise in and via the UK ... Ca-Moron is being understandably reserved in showing any discernible signs of confidence[in public at any rate] . The real Powers that be are yet to see show reliable they find Ca-Moron to carry on the BUSINESS of running the undemocratic enterprise that denies, deprives and destitute groups and sections of the population in the UK and via the UK in many parts of the world not least in Asia and Africa .... are giving Gordon Brown a mere few weeks in which to stage yet another stunt....so they can decide whether to let him carry on or be asked to give way to their 'more suitable nominee to replace him in the fronting of the remainder of the brand Blaired....... Then they will open the way for the propaganda onslaught making BRAND Ca-MORON LOOK as the 'new' [!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!] project......to continue with the corrupt status quo... then they will stage the various bogus challenges to Gordon Brown or they will unleash the various reserved slip-ups in his administration that will draw undue attention to Gordon Brown's, by then, heightened level of incompetence... Heightened in the propaganda that is WATCH THIS AADHIKARonline SPACE.....
Editor©Muhammad Haque
1155 GMT Monday 2 June 2008
The 4th edition of the day 1155 MT Monday 2 June 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill; Khoodeelaar! the campaign in defence of the economic, social, human rights of the people in the East End of London and the campaign against the abuse of the public positions and the public resources by the seekers of or the occupants in the publicly paid for posts and positions in the name of the people of the East End of Lon don... Khoodeelaar! the No to 'Crossrail hole Bill' CAMPAIGN from the Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area
The KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business Crossrail hole agenda is also the campaign against creation of new poverty in the inner city East End of London.... More HERE shortly
LINES OF HUNGER FROM INNER CITY Blaired Britain - updating the 'Lines of Hunger from bangladesh' first written and published by Muhammad Haque in May 1991...... Updates have been rescheduled and will appear here in the week starting on Monday 2 June 2008
On Sunday 22 January 2006, at a Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN meeting held at the 'Brady Centre', 192 Hanbury Street, London E1, the KHOODEELAAR! campaign organiser gave the key note speech about the campaign. In the speech, he also stated, extempore, the core of a motion that the meeting unanimously supported DEMANDING that the local Tower Hamlets Council passed a full Council motion saying ‘No to the Crossrail hole Bill’.
Two years 4 months have passed since that time and the Khoodeelaar! campaign has been renewing the same demand to the Council. The Tower Hamlets Council has not passed that motion. The community has not been respected by Tower Hamlets Council on this issue. Yet the 'councillors' who attended that meeting have remained on the same Council claiming to represent the community that is affected by the Crossrail hole plot..... So what is the secret? Is it in any way to do with any ambiguity about what was said in the Khoodeelaar! campaign demand as passed by the meeting held on 22 january 2006? There could be no ambiguity. Just for the records, we again publish the main text of the KHOODEELAAR! legal action process service communication about the demand that was sent to the then 'chief executive' in the Tower Hamlets Borough COUNCIL , Christine Gilbert on 25 january 2006.
By©Muhammad Haque .....
Wednesday 25 January 2006
To
Christine Gilbert
Chief Executive
And
Owen Whalley
Head of Major Project Development
London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council
Mulberry Place
5 Clove Crescent
London E14 2BG
Dear Ms Gilbert and Mr Whalley
Subject Khoodeelaar campaign meeting –
Demand 22 January 2006 –
The texts [2] sent by fax 25 Jan 2006
1. You both have been sent this morning the main texts of the KHOODEELAAR!
campaign resolution as delivered and agreed at the meeting on 22 January 2006 held [at the Brady centre, 192 Hanbury street London E1] in the evening of Sunday 22 January 2006 demanding that the London borough of tower hamlets council pass a single motion as their resolution against the Crossrail hole plan/bill as it is in the uk house of commons now and that they do so in the next 11 days and that the resolution be put to the uk parliament and to the uk secretary of state transport department [Department for Transport= ‘DfT’] and that the resolution be phrased and drafted in an unambiguous unequivocal way accurately truthfully reflecting and representing the demand of the community.
2. Mr Owen Whalley has been sent the copy – and is being sent this further amplifier and clarifier – because of the central role he has been playing (as the published documents of the LBTH council suggest) in the promotion of the Crossrail hole scheme/project/bill as far as the ‘development’ of the Crossrail ‘project’ for the LBTH council goes. He has been sent the material also in order for him to be in receipt of what the community has demanded and what he as the designated employee on ‘Crossrail’ in the LBTH council has to do so that the community’s lawful and urgent demand is seen to be recognised and implemented by the relevant employees in the council on every relevant occasion.
3. As the same campaign meeting [22 January 2006] also agreed the taking of legal action in the event that tower hamlets council fail to implement the demand, you both are most certainly going to be included as parties in any such action and so you are being sent this in our voluntary compliance with the requirements of natural justice, due process [and other related concepts] and the civil procedure rules.
4. The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in defence of the BRICK LANE London E1 AREA and against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project/bill is able to confirm to you both today Wednesday 25 January 2006 that we shall include additional demands for the very detailed legal and democratic and economic accountability from the council over any additional costs that tower hamlets council is caused to be embroiled in or involved in or engaged in - whether in any further attempt/s on the parts of those who have access to the finances and the ‘powers’ and the contacts of the London borough of tower hamlets council to justify their roles and their promotions of the Crossrail hole project or in any further unreasonable, irresponsible, improper, undemocratic, antisocial and or ill-conceived egotistic bid/s in defiance of the very clearly expressed demands of the local community and or in defiance of the campaigning organisations representing the fears, needs and demands of the local community against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project/bill and you both shall be included in any list of witnesses who will be asked to give evidence on their own roles and the origins of any orders or decisions that caused them to play the parts that you found yourselves playing in defiance of the local community’s clear demand against the Crossrail hole plan/scheme/project Bill. 5. Ms Christine Gilbert has been put on notice since the first quarter of 2004 when the chair of the CBRUK organisation (which politically organised the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign during that same period in 2004) initiated the first series of extensive questions which were drafted and put to her concerning the role she had played in advising and or working with or in carrying out the actual intentions of any controlling group member of the LBTH council on the Crossrail hole scheme/project/scheme. She has failed to date to deal with those questions and despite two recent [final] reminders has continued to fail or refuse to answer the outstanding questions. She has also failed to provide any lawful or reasonable explanation or lawful justification for her conduct and role concerned in the context of the KHOODEELAAR campaign demands, questions and representations.
6. The statements that have been published in the past two weeks in the name of or by the uses and abuses of the LBTH council as the corporate entity and about the Crossrail hole bill have contained more than one contradictory assertion and allusion to alleged facts thus creating new grounds for the community to be able to claim that ‘the TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL’ in general and the identifiable ‘controlling group’ councillors are carrying on conducting themselves in defiance of or in conflict with the wishes and the interests of the local community concerned.
7. The KHOODEELAAR campaign is able to confirm to both ms Christine Gilbert and Mr Owen Whalley that this communication dated and transmitted on Wednesday 25 January 2006 is being made to both of them as a very last attempt at helping the controlling persons involved in the LBTH council over the Crossrail hole scheme/project/ bill avoid placing or pushing the corporate entity of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council and its resources in a very costly confrontation with the community in the East End
8. Mr Owen Whalley’s circular ‘to all members’ of the TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL dated 19 September 2005 contains a misleading statement that is of crucial relevance to us and which statement as put to the meeting of 22 January 2006 and was loudly and clearly rejected by the meeting. That statement is in the last sentence in paragraph two of the circular (‘the petition also makes explicit the council’s opposition to an intervention shaft in Hanbury Street and preference for its relocation to Woodseer Street’.)
9. The meaning of the phrase ‘misleading statement’ in this context is any statement that contradicts the community’s opposition to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail hole, to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail shaft tunnel, to the [or ‘a’] Crossrail hole in THE BRICK LANE London E1 AREA and in any other part of THE London BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS. This is the position as expressed by the public meeting in support of the Khoodeelaar campaign held at the Brady centre on Sunday 22 January 2006. This takes into account the KHOODEELAAR CAMPAIGN'S remit which recognises the rights of the people in the Mile End area that is also affected by the known Crossrail plans.
10. The KHOODEELAAR campaign is able to confirm that it will treat this document and communication [25 January 2006] as being a reasonable final comprehensive advice, notice and representation to the two most relevant employees in the LBTH council of the community’s simple and straightforward demand and position on the role of the LBTH Council in the matter of the Crossrail hole project/scheme/ Bill and of the task that the community has asked the LBTH Council to carry out within the specified time by passing the resolution and then making the same resolution available to the MPs select committee currently sitting to formally consider the relevant aspects of the Crossrail hole Bill [‘the Crossrail Bill’ or the ‘Crossrail hybrid Bill’] in time so that there is no frustration of the community’s wish in the remainder of the process of legislation involved.
KHOODEELAAR campaign demand 22 January 2006 and follow-up legal notice to Christine Gilbert and Owen Whalley concluded at 1436 HRS GMT on Wednesday 25 January 2006
AADHIKARonline campaign news commentary against Crossrail hole agenda...1510 Hrs GMT 1610 Hrs UK Time London Friday 30 May 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot UPDATE on Friday 30 May 2008 shows up the charade that is the UK Houses of Parliament..... As seen in the willing servility to the executive as exhibited in the behaviour of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ ‘select committee ‘ fronted by the place man Alan Meale and his ‘opposition’ [what ‘opposition’] place men and place women .... As Khoodeelaar! had predicted in December 2005, within hours of the announcement being made that a ‘select committee’ had been set up, there was no chance in a million years that the ‘select committee’ would allow the evidence against Crossrail to be put on the record before the committee. As we also correctly predicted, the ‘ Crossrail Bill’ ‘select committee’ in the UK House of Commons that had just been announced [December 2005] would behave like a stooge committee. As it in fact did. And we then predicted, in November 2007 when we first became directly involved in communications wit the part of the ‘House of Lords’ concerned with the ‘Crossrail Bill’] that UNLESS some members of the ‘House of Lords’ [what an affront to all of us who do not consider any human being to be worthy of being called a lord!] showed by their conduct that they UNDERSTOOD what the duties of a constitutionally active legislative Upper chamber of a democratic and accountable Parliament had to do and UNLESS they did accordingly and constitutionally and unless they behaved in manifestly honest, intellectually competent, ethically transparent, objectively independent way,,, they would discredit the ‘case for the House of Lords’... We went on to give them support, encouragement and advice... We did so in our direct communications as addressed to the bureaucracy set up ‘ within the House of Lords’ for the purpose of ‘the formal treatment of the Crossrail Bill’. As we did in published comments including in those carried in particular on the Times newspaper web site.... And we did so for the simple purpose of backing the movement for democracy in the UK, the movement for accountability in and via Parliament to the people, and in the particular case on the CRASSLY conceived, Big Business-agenda Crossrail scam. And we called for an end to the wasteful plot via Crossrail that was just afoot.... in the ‘Upper House’, ‘ via’ the ‘Upper House’..... We also examined the history of the ‘House of Lords’.. and we referred to Oliver Cromwell... and said that so dire, so empty, so barren has been the field of formally instituted opposition in and via parliament in britain that we looked in vain over records of centuries to find any significant acton that was taken to bring the illegitimate elements that made up the ‘House of Lords’ to book.... as it were... We did all of this in order to tell the servile time servers that we were NOT impressed by their records generally and that unless they showed they were willing to tell the truth about the people’s serious objections against Crossrail they, the ‘House of Lords’ members concerned would go down as contributing yet more to discredit the already largely illegitimate and discredited ‘House’.. And so they have done..... [To be continued]
AADHIKARonline bringing the Muhammad Haque daily commentary on the poverty of Blaired Britain now fronted b y Gordon Brown; and focussing this weekend on the extravagant poverty of David Cameron and his colluders who are insulting the remaining intelligence of the people in the UK........Ca-monroin evidently is operating on the assumption that the Tory violence by poverty creation and poverty-perpetration is all acceptable now... and that with the likes of Frank the Benefit Fraudsters from Merseyside die [who is being given obscene accolades, in fact for his role in undermining Gordon Brown’s tottering reputation...] ... The facts must be separated daily from the lies that Thatcher’s revivalist gang led by Ca-Moron is going to make legitimate and acceptable..... The agenda that Crossrail hole plot is part of is the same agenda that Margaret Thatcher, Norman Tebbit, Tony Blair have supported and operated and the agenda that Gordon Brown was lured by Ken Livingstone into backing in a brazenly imprudent way in September/October 2007..... And the agenda that is being revived by Ca-Moron conservatives who are faking it... as they dress up as caring, concerned conservatives... They are nothing the sort... They care only for their opportunity to get into power and smash society to bits... society that Thatcher violated and society that Thatcher was smashing up when she was given the farewell........ That agenda is bad for the people in the inner cities... That agenda is bad for the people elsewhere in the uK..... Opposing the thinking behind that agenda is the first task.... Read more here daily
View HERE the latest Muhammad Haque daily commentary on the Gordon Brown-fronted Blaired regime in the UK ...
Also the latest KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘Crossrail hole plot’ CAMPAIGN news and constitutional law analyses are accessible via this web site. This site carries the updates and summaries on the Khoodeelaar! Constitutional Law Opposition to the Î hybrid and the Big Business-prompted "Crossrail Bill" which is now [at 25 May 2008] being given the formal and the illegitimate and the unconstitutional seal of approval by the stooged and the staged and the undemocratic, the unaccountable, the unethically-controlled and the illegitimate agenda-seeking ‘Select Committee’ set up in UK legislative House of Lords under the actual influence and for the benefit [=profit to the tunes of £Billions of money that would be forced out of the UK public] of Big Business influences, elements, agencies, lobbys represented by the front-line Military Industrial Complex operations as typified by the USA conglomerate Bechtel....
KHOODEELAAR! commentary on Crossrail hole plot-peddling Chris Grayling’s latest pack of lies against the people pushed into poverty in the UK - we show up the crassness of Crossrail hole-plot-backer Chris Grayling in a series of comments due to start today Tuesday 27 May 2008
By©Muhammad Haque
1454 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 28 May 2008
What is the evidence that justifies the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council DESCRIBING the controlling clique as corrupt?
There is not just one piece of evidence. There are countless items of evidence. The sum of the evidence both shows that the clique is engaged in wrong conduct about Crossrail. And that it is also engaged in wrong conduct about the overall, the general duties it has towards the people in the Borough of Tower Hamlets about other aspects of life that relate to the duties of a local council.
One of the persistent patterns of the lying behaviour by the corrupt clique on the Tower Hamlets 'locally elected' [!!!!!!!] Council has been their refusal to observe basic standards of ethics and behaviour. Ethics and standards of behaviour that on paper any 'locally elected council' 'administration' would be expected to practise and respect.
And how deep, complete, has been the evidence of the Tower Hamlets Council’s wrong and wrongful behaviour?
As deep as the numbers of years over which the clique has been in control. As deep as the particulars and as extensive as the details of the claque’s collusion with Big Business proponents who have got in league with the Tower ~Hamlets Council with the aim of taking over the land and the spaces in the East End of London under covers of plausible projects but in reality for the benefit of Big Business And to benefit the City of London-linked exploiters at the expense of the people of the East End of London the ordinary population in the borough in the end.
This is seen in the dishonest behaviour of the clique that was fronted by Christine Gilbert at the time.
Gilbert as chief executive in the Council made a most untrue assertion about the actual policy of the clique on Crossrail.
This concerned the so-called cabinet meeting of 6 October 2004.
The Khoodeelaar! campaign observed the meeting and it was clear that the community’s serious opposition to the Council’s collusion with the Crossrail scam [it was not a Bill in Parliament yet - that took place nearly 4 months later] was being sidelined by the clique.
So the Khoodeelaar! campaign organised for the relevant aspect of the community's questions to be put to Christine Gilbert in the context of the clique's conduct.
It was never expected that Gilbert would come out with an admission that her clique was in the wrong. Or that the clique had let the community down.
But it was essential for the purpose of extensive evidential processing of her conduct that she was given the opportunity to come clean and admit that her clique had indeed been in the wrong.
Regardless of the actual final position Gilbert would take on the subject under reference, it was expected that she should show normal courtesy and behave in accordance with the rules that require the ‘chief officer’ of the local council to properly and timely acknowledge communications she received.
What did Gilbert do?
Did she behave in accordance with the standards expected of the town clerk?
She behaved with undue delay.
She pretended that she had not received the communications containing the questions.
Was that exceptional?
The answer, on the facts, is that NO.
CHRISTINE Gilbert behaved with the same prejudice and with the same lack of accountability towards the whole population in Tower Hamlets that had been the feature of the Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique for decades.
That is why the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has had to establish new criteria so that the history of neglect as shown by the ‘elected’ local council to the people in whose name the council is ‘elected’ is not repeated. That the people are offered accountable representation by the ‘elected’ council.
That was the only way in which the community’s interests could be defended.
That was the only way that the Crossrail hole attacks could be stopped.
Christine Gilbert behaved with no regard for the constitutional duties of the local Council. She behaved opportunistically and on the assumption that there would no ‘issue made on the floor of the council’ by any of the ‘elected members on the 'Tower Hamlets Council'’.
She showed no recognition of the fact that her conduct, her role and the implications of her conduct and of her role could indeed be challenged in court.
Or did she think that the Khoodeelaar! campaign notes to her and to her clique saying that a time would come when their abuse of power and their collusion with the agenda of the Big Business would be challenged in court was not part of the real programme of action ?
How similar was Christine Gilbert’s disrespect to the ordinary codes of ethical, unaccountable behaviour to the disrespect shown to ethics, morality and the norms of constitutionality by the bureaucracy set up in the name of the ‘House of Lords’ that has been in fact peddling the Crossrail hole plotting agenda desired by Big Business, a la Bechtel of USA ? [To be continued]
AADHIKAR Media Foundation, a wholly non-profit, non-commercial media service that is publishing the KHOODEELAAR! campaign and information materials on the internet for the advancement of understanding in the cause eo f establishing human rights by economic and social justice in the UK inner city areas and for the dissemination of the lessons learnt in the struggles against Big Business and their stooged regimes that Blairing typifies.... The apparent dissemination of the Gordon Brown fronted Blaired regime in the UK is not to be confused with the overdue disintegration of the corrupt and the undemocratic 'system'... By the looks of things at 0830 "system" GMT in London on [Bank holiday] 26 May 2008, David "Ca-Moron" has NOT been given the actual go-ahead to proclaim that he is already 'home and dry' [Electorally speaking] as the next manager of the Capitalist Imperialist enterprise in and via the UK ... Ca-Moron is being understandably reserved in showing any discernible signs of confidence[in public at any rate] . The real Powers that be are yet to see show reliable they find Ca-Moron to carry on the BUSINESS of running the undemocratic enterprise that denies, deprives and destitute groups and sections of the population in the UK and via the UK in many parts of the world not least in Asia and Africa .... are giving Gordon Brown a mere few weeks in which to stage yet another stunt....so they can decide whether to let him carry on or be asked to give way to their 'more suitable nominee to replace him in the fronting of the remainder of the brand Blaired....... Then they will open the way for the propaganda onslaught making BRAND Ca-MORON LOOK as the 'new' [!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!] project......to continue with the corrupt status quo... then they will stage the various bogus challenges to Gordon Brown or they will unleash the various reserved slip-ups in his administration that will draw undue attention to Gordon Brown's, by then, heightened level of incompetence... Heightened in the propaganda that is WATCH THIS AADHIKARonline SPACE.....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the 'Crossrail Bill' [a Bill in UK Parliament]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SGqe5VQwLHI/AAAAAAAABfc/MEjjMWby2dc/S226/Khoodeelaar!+try+this+logo.gif)
![London [Rupert Murdoched] Times, Wed. 7 May 2008](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SCIVsQ1wX-I/AAAAAAAAAs8/u1j4VZpbH0Y/S226/1676149.jpg)
