Crossrail hole Bill 'draft'-'writer' Tony McNulty now 'writes' to do away with civil liberties in Britain....

How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties 'minister' Tony McNulty?

the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....

By©Muhammad Haque
2045 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008

How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?

Why is this question being asked?

The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.

First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.

McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.

Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]

By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.

Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.

Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.

Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.

And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.

What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?

Because that was what he was saying!

Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.

Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.



Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.

No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.

In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.

Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].

No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.

McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.

I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….

Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.

It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.

He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.

The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’

McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.

And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.

Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.

It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.

This is worrying.

How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies belief…

[To be continued]