By©Muhammad Haque
1310 GMT 1410 Hrs UK Time London Saturday 17 May 2008:
Khoodeelaar! No to “Crossrail hole plot ...” CAMPAIGN has taken the lead in auditing and in publishing the findings of the audit of all the public and the publicly paid for agencies, bodies and outfits that are operated or funded or kept in place IN THE NAME of the people of the ordinary East End of London....
As an integral part of this acton programme, Khoodeelaar! has adopted the analysis of the longer standing movement in defence of human rights in context in the East End of London that movement on evidence found that the sole ‘local’ commrcially run ‘newspaper’ in the name of the East End of London, has indeed been the East London Apartheider. The East London Idiotiser.
The East London A********r is not a responsible newspaper if the criteria of responsibility is in any way linked with the attention given to the behaviour of the bodies, groups, personnel that are publicly paid for in order to provide service to the people of the East End of London.
As we have pointed out in the past four years in the context of the Khoodeelaar! campaign against ‘the Big Business Crossrail hole plot against the East End’, the East London Apartheider has lied persistently in favour of the lying and the Crossrail hole plot-inviting clique on Tower Hamlets Council.
It lied in March 2006 and untruthfully, prejudicially, outrageously offensively carried a lying piece giving credit to the then typifier of the Council for the then just announced retreat by the then Crossrail hole plot Minister [‘Secretary of State for Transport’] Alistair Darling on the planned Crossrail dirt hole in the Hanbury Street [off Brick Lane], London E1.
Later in the year, the East London Idiotiser carried another series of plugs praising Christine Gilbert and Michael Keith. There was no ground, no basis, no fact for their doing so. Not on the conduct of either GILBERT or Keith in terms of what their parts had been in the polices that so aggravated against the overall interests and the specific interests,m needs and rights of the people of and in the ordinary East and of London.
Why did the East London Idiotiser do that?
Did it do it out of ignorance?
Did it do it because it did;t know better?
No. The Khoodeelaar! campaign had made available EXCLUSIVELY researched , original evidence ti the ‘editorial staff’ of the 'East London Idiotiser' over the previous YEARS showing the breath, the extents of the part played by both Christine Gi,bert and Michael Keith in INVITING the Crossrail hole plot upon and against the East End of London.
The evidence, the analysis, the finding that Khoodeelaar! provided cannot be denied or evidentially challenged,. This is so because all our findings and our conclusions have been adequately and transparently and comprehensively sourced. And those sources are themselves parts of the UK Government operation. Including of the other Big Business affiliates and colluder institutions, agencies, outfits, outlets such as and including the entirety of the UK Big Business mainstream media. As typified by the Financial Times and the BBC. Besides those, the others are equally of such undeniably pro-Big Business, CRASSrail hole plot-peddling affiliation that no-one, least of all Michael Keith or Christine Gilbert [both of whom have been extensively associated with the Big Business propaganda operation misconducted via the ‘Tower Hamlets Council’] would credibly make even a suggestion that those sources were open to question.
For if they did, they themselves [Gilbert and Keith] would be condemning themselves by such evidentially untenable audacity.
So the ‘East London Idiotiser’ failed on purpose. It failed to tell the truth out of prejudice and out of deeply corrupted mentality on the parts of its key decision-making ‘personnel’.
But they made the decision, on each and every occasion that they devoted promotional space and words to the Crossrail hole plot-inviting clique on Tower Hamlets ‘local’ Council, knowing that they [The Idiotiser] were adding to the lies and that they were doing so despite also claiming that their commercial title - [the Idiotiser] was in business allegedly to serve the community in the East End of London.
A more brazen contradiction would be hard to come across in context.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
On the facts of the persistent misconduct, misreporting, mispromotion of the corrupt Council clique by the Arch-lying ‘East London Idiotiser’, going all out to pocket as much of the Council’s ‘advertising’ revenue as they could contrive to justify they ‘deserved’..... ......
[To be continued]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment