Why Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole-inviter Council has had no 'opposition leadership' on the Council -

By©Muhammad Haque
1055 Hrs GMT
London Tuesday
13 May 2008

[Continuing from the previous item about Tower Hamlets Council published here this morning]

Just how solid is that ‘belief’? Or, rather. how sound is that ground for that ‘belief’ by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council that there is no ‘alternative’ to the current clique, that may take over the Council at the next coun cil election?


The ‘candidates’ have not spoken yet.

But by looking at the behaviour of the ‘candidates’ it is reasonable to say that they feel that they are not vincible. That they will, remain in the ‘majority’ group and they will ‘reign’ in the Tower Hamlets Borough!

And why should they feel so confident?

Part of the reason is to be found in what janet did!

Janet Ludlow!

Ludlow was allegedly the ‘leader of the group that was known as the ‘official opposition’ on Tower Hamlets Council upto the May 2006 council election.

She had anything upto 16 councillors including herself, that belonged, on paper, to the same group. They were treated as the official opposition on Tower Hamlets Coun cil...

But did they oppose?


And if they did, did the voters notice their opposition?


This could not be tested more comprehensively than on the matter of the Janet Ludlow role on Crossrail hole plot....

Khoodeelaar! campaign has published quite a significant number of pieces about Janet Ludlow’s role.

In fact, not even the ‘local’ ‘East London Idiotiser’ has written so much about Janet Ludlow.

We examine her role in context, next


[To be continued]