Frank Field is a backer of Big Business; Frank Field is a key Benefit Fraudster...

By©Muhammad Haque
1312 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday 13 May 2008

Remember this: Frank Field is claiming all the credits for the pressure on Gordon Brown on behalf of the poor.

Then think again: does Frank Field really side with the poor.

If Gordon Brown and Alistair darling are guilty of attacking the poor then Frank Field too should be held responsible.

Ever since Field got fired as a so-called welfare reform minister [he blames Brown for the sacking] Field has tried to make a side career as an expert.

But what is the man’s expertise?

True that he is an expert at getting the media platforms.

But what does he actually know about the British welfare system?

I would say that Frank Field is a fraud.

in fact Frank Field is a benefit fraud.

Frank Field does not know about welfare and he most certainly is no friend of the poor.

It is about time that the fraudulent Frank Field were exposed.


The first thing that needs to be understood about welfare in Britain is this: what does it amount to ?

Does welfare exist ?


Yes, people are on benefits. There are benefits.

But what do these benefits mean in real terms?


And how do people get into this state?

What has Frank Field to say about this?

When did he say anything about the cause of poverty and the link between poverty and the state?

And what was his solution to poverty?

Does the state create poverty?


If it does then shouldn't we be addressing the state creation of poverty rather than the people who are pushed into poverty?


And what exactly is wealth?

Where does wealth come from?

Is there a secret tunnel through which wealth travels?

These questions ought to be asked and the answers to them sought from Frank Field.

But the media platforms that are given to him are not fronted - or set - by those who want to ask the questions far less to demand the answers.

In fact BOTH Brown and Field are on the side of the state dominating the level of peoples’ rights, if there are any left.

Because if they asked the questions, they would find that like the NHS, the principles underlying the setting up of the welfare side to the state, have never been respected by the state.

Or by Big Business that dies set the agenda of the behaviour of the state.

And with the passage of time and with the revival of the very greed and the very capitalistic corruption at the centre of the state, the institutions that did tend to make society civilised, have been undermined by the holders of power in the state.

And that is why Frank Field was a failure as a welfare reform minister. Because he is a servant of the status quo.

And the status quo is the same among all the three parties in the so-called democratic parliament.

The result is that when Brown disposed of the so-called 10p rate, they did not mount any opposition to it.

Only by accident did the 10p change become a topic of temporary political moment.

[To be continued]