Impending gloom and the Poverty of Gordon Brown - the updater commentary on the emptiness and the immorality of Gordon Brown's regime -1

By©Muhammad Haque
1305 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday 9 April 2008



Poverty of Gordon Brown - subject that is key to the wider poverty he is set to spread across society and the world -

Gordon Brown is causing poverty in Britain by colluding with Big Business. And by in effect following the agenda set by Big Business.

This is seen in his backing for Bechtel-type looters

Brown’s so-called socialist ‘new best colluder’ Ken Livingstone has been having such a notoriously deeply mysterious and inexplicable relationship with those Bechtel-type looters.

Indeed, Livingstone has already even RECOMMENDED Bechtel as in effect the most suitable candidate for a multi£Million Crossrail -linked contract, ahead of formal tendering etc.

Livingstone's ‘socialist’ propagandists would not find anything wrong in the record of his payment of £Millions of public money to the [‘retired’] CIA man Bob Kiley who did not hide his contempt for democracy when he prescribed on the BBC that ‘elected’ [local councillors and MPs] should be locked up in a room and forced to agree to publicly fund the Big Business Crossrail scam...

Anyone with any even the most basic understanding of legitimacy, democracy, accountability and human rights, would not be able to allow that mentality to be treated as being acceptable in a ‘publicly employed’ decision-maker who was given such powers and so much public money by Livingstone as ‘the Transport Commissioner’ in the name of `London......

Yet Kiley was defended by Livingstone... Even as Livingstone was forced to let Kiley go... The ‘force’ was in the rare newspaper interview in which Kiley admitted, without any regret or remorse, to being an alcoholic. An alcoholic who had no idea why he was paid so much public money by Ken Livingstone... It wasn’t Livingstone who had found anything wrong at all in Kiley alcohol addiction.... Indeed, Livingstone boasted that one of the ‘qualities’ he admired in Kiley was the way that Kiley INTIMIDATED people during negotiations...!

Against this background, a look at Gordon Brown’s endorsement of Crossrail and Brown's backing for the Big Business Crossrail hole plot-backer Ken Livingstone is very timely and necessary.

And it is not just in Brown’s capitulation to and collusion with the Bechtel types....


He is even more deeply involved with some of the foulest practitioners of the corrupt craft of neo conservative capitalism... It is worth noting that during Brown’s official tenure at No 11 Downing Street over ten years, he, Gordon Brown, made it more easy for the world’s crassest capitalist neo-con looters to arrive in Britain and to set about exploiting all the imaginable loopholes they could find to rob the society of its resources.,...

Enter Goldman Sachs and all that they signify, imply, typify and represent about Gordon Brown's ‘prudent’ practices and policies....and records...

The poverty of understanding that Gordon Brown suffers from comes across every time he spouts out the intellectually offensive, empty and and the very unsound phrases like 'child poverty’.

That two word phrase was devised in Britain by sub-thinking ‘thinkers’ who neither understood poverty nor human rights.

They were by a decade or so, forerunners to the likes of Jack Straw.

There their differences vanish.

Like Straw, they were liars. Like Straw, they are liars. And they are destined to stay liars.

How is Straw a liar?

Straw is a liar because when in formal opposition [before May 1997] he was posing as one of those Bliar-fronted Opposition party ‘high flyers’ who knew his ethics and his morality. Especially so about human rights and justice.

As a technically law-schooled careerist, Straw is one of those professional liars and cheats who are allowed a wide degree of ‘benefits of the doubt’ [=’deference’] by the ‘mainstream’ media.

Consequently, the idiot reporters [for idiots they mostly are] never ever expose the lying Straw. And they never queston him.

And the reason why they don’t do either is because they are so so deeply ignorant about things to do with the substance of policy and practice. And they are a million miles away from the world of scrutiny. Of evidence. Of ethics. Of legitimacy....

[To be continued]