By©Muhammad Haque
1858 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday 3 June 2008
This is the contextual update of the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto that I had written in December 2005 and published in the last week of December 2005 and the first fortnight of january 2006.
This update will be published over a few days.
The KHOODEELAAR! manifesto as published in December 2005/January 2006 was part of the movement for actual accountability by the ‘local’ ‘elected’ ‘council’ and other ‘locally elected’ holders of positions in the name of the people in the East End of London.
In terms of the contents and the purpose and the implications, the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto was unique. And has remained unique. No ‘party’ ‘group’ or ‘grouping’ has published a manifesto.
They may have claimed to have done so.
By the ‘party’, ‘group’ and ‘grouping’ here, I mean of the ones that have got ‘councillors’ on the Tower Hamlets Council in the names of the ‘parties’ and or ‘groups’ or ‘groupings’.
None of those has published any manifesto.
And the fact that they have not done so has also gone unremarked on, uncommented on. Except by Khoodeleaar!
[To be continued]
_________________________________
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
Khoodeelaar! Manifesto
Part C
Tuesday 10 January 2006
PART C of the KHOODEELAAR MANIFESTO 2006
1. The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will use the existing laws to establish the facts of the local Tower Hamlets council’s use of the legal powers to make grants and other funds available to ‘voluntary’ organisations in the community.
2. The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will make sure that the holders of senior positions in the employment of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council (LBTH ). The LBTH Council do not follow the political orders or personal preferences of individual councillors or of controlling groups of councillors if those orders or preferences are at variance with the interest of the local community and if those orders and preferences are also in conflict with the social, cultural educational, economic and environmental interest of the local community
3. The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will publish the fullest legally available information on which groups in the local community in a given financial year was given what sum of money by the LBTH Council to achieve what objective and under what democratic and transparent criteria
4. The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will publish the active links of all holders of elected positions in the Council with all known groups and groupings in the Borough so that the behaviour of the councillors can be democratically monitored by the community.
5. The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will also publish the information on the councillors’ links with any senior employee of the council and with any other councillor so that the behaviour of the councillors can be democratically monitored by the community
PART D will appear later on this week
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment