Throughout his time at OFSTED, Chris Woodhead hogged the headlines. One way or another. And most of his 'achievement' was in efficiently lying....
How did he do that?
Didn’t the ‘media’ who were giving Woodhead the platforms know the facts, the truth of what was going on?
The answer is that they did. But they did not care enough to put a halt to the lying time-server...
And the lying self-server.
Woodhead lied when he allowed his mistress Ruth Miskin to be given OFSTED publicity...
He let her have the OFSTED publicity without declaring that he was sleeping with her...He also allowed OFSTED bureaucracy to give Ruth Miskin that particular publicity without showing any interest in making sure that he was not abusing his position or that he was not compromising OFSTED’s neutrality, independence and objectivity...
That grotesque abuse of position by Woodhead was typical of the morally compromised man.
Yet the media generally and the so-called specialist education media in London allowed Woodhead the positive spot that he would not deserve had there been any moral standards.
And therein lies the problem of how the 'mainstream British media' and the allied associated institutions cause and contribute to the creation of unaccountability. How they perpetuate lack of accountability. How they thus make it impossible for any standards to be established fro any sustained amounts of time in society.
For Chris Woodhead was NEVER a deeply thoughtful man in possession of original thoughts and ideas about society.
He was also NEVEr a moral person.
His career as a school teacher should, have given the conclusive evidence to put paid to his pretensions that he was able to confect and flaunt around the time that Tony Blair made him the OFSTED boss.
Back to his disservice to the community in Tower Hamlets where Ruth Miskin was employed as head teacher of a primary school.
For Ruth Miskin was given the publicity for her enterprising ‘work’ whilst she was at the primary school that is situated iN Tower Hamlets.... By ALL standards of scrutiny, evaluation and assessment, the behaviour of Ruth Miskin whilst she was ta that school In Tower Hamlets,maws no different from the behaviour of the ‘average;’ headteacher to be found in a comparable other school in the same borough at that time.
Whatever ‘edge’ the media ascribed and attributed to Ruth Miskin, was really not real.
It was spin.
The only difference being that the spin was decorated with the veneer of ‘professionalism’ as the subject was ‘education’ an allegedly specialist area....
But the lies were unconcealable....undeniable....
The hypes for Ruth Miskin stank of the links, the abuse of position and the self-seeking careerism and sheer selfishness of Chris Woodhead ....
[To be continued]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment