Crassness of the crassly conceived, callously wasteful and diversionary 'London Crossrail' touted for by corrupt clique in Tower Hamlets Council

Crassness of the crassly conceived, callously wasteful and diversionary 'London Crossrail' touted for by corrupt clique in Tower Hamlets Council

By@Muhammad Haque
1205 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday
1 July 2008



Crassness of the crassly conceived, callously wasteful and diversionary 'London Crossrail' touted for by corrupt clique in Tower Hamlets Council

The KHOODEELAAR! evidence in the legal and the constitutional law actions against the Crossrail hole attacks on the community in the East End of London INCLUDES the fact that the campaign has created the opportunity, at every stage in the past 55 months [so far of this campaign] for ALL bona fide, legitimacy-claiming 'local' [=based physically in the area known as the 'London borough of Tower Hamlets], to make a contribution [or more than one] significant at and genuine enough for it to be shown on the list of the Khoodeelaar! campaign literature, web sites and other forums.

While we have given that opportunity to all as described and defined above, we have also maintained our very own and the very originally created NO to Crossrail hole, ‘No to Crossrail hole Bill’;, ‘No to Crassrail hole plot’ , ‘ No to Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council clique’ [and similar] materials that constitute the argument and the case for stopping the crassly conceived Crossrail in all its crassness...

Our materials cover all the familiar types and categories of statements comments and information that a multifarious campaign such as Khoodeelaar! would be reasonably expected to crate and publish and circulate. We show that our materials aLSO TRANSCEND the limits and confines of the ordinary ‘campaign literature and diagnostics’. We have created analytical and logical spaces which would have been expected to obtain in a ‘western civilised Metropolis’ physically located right next door to the centre or at least one waning centre of the global capitalistic ‘investor attractions’ misleadingly called ‘the City of London’.

We have gone out of the way and beyond the call of campaigning imperatives and universally recognisable constitutionality compatibility to give even the most petty and the most selfish of time-servers operating in the name of and at the expense of the community in the area known as the ‘London Borough of Tower Hamlets’.


How many of those have cared to recognise the option and respond in defence of the community they parasite off every day?

We shall come to the dissection of the evidence of the behaviour of those 'successful' and shameless parasites.

[To be continued]