Thursday, April 10, 2008

Muhammad Haque commenting on the Times, London 'legal analysis' of the High Court ruling on the BAE SFO Blair corruption deal

This is the latest confirmation of the NORM of the widespread abuse of Parliament and constitutionality by the executive in the UK.

Either there is rule of law or there is not.

Where have the opposition spokespeople been?

Why hasn’t there been ANY move by the mainstream Opposition in the ‘elected’ House of Commons to force compliance with the rule of law by the Executive?

Why haven THEY been the applicants for this judicial review of the highly corrupt behaviour by the Blairing regime?

This one is in the news because of the High Court action. How many thousands of similarly corrupt deals and decisions are being suppressed as we all hear about this particular one?

You say that Goldsmith is no longer in office. You [Frances Gibb, timesonline, 10.04.2008] mean that therefore he is exempt from liability for such an outrageous and open defiance of the rule of law!

Is that acceptable?

What kind of immunity must be allowed from answering on two of the most damaging violations he has committed against ethics and against constitutionality ?

How is Goldsmith able to get away like this, time after time?

Who are his de facto partners in the grand violations of the constitution?

No comments: