Khoodeelaar! criminological diagnosis [intro] of the lying agenda operated by Big Business Crossrail hole plot-touts in UK Parliament

Khoodeelaar! the campaign against the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London, has been described in express terms, from the start of the campaign in January 2004.

KHOODEELAAR! NO TO CROSSRAIL
NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE
NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE BILL
NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE AGENDA

and in similar words and phrases


And the descriptive words have varied in length. But the core of the description has remained unaltered. And unalterable.

That KHOODEELAAR! stands in OPPOSITION to Crossrail.

That KHOODEELAAR!! Opposes Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London.


But the OPPOSITION is to the entirety of the CROSSRAIL package.

That we have initiated ALL the research ourselves into the key aspects of the defence of the community that Crossrail has been devised to attack.


That in all our public and published and private statements and communications, we have said NO to Crossrail hole. We have meant No to Crossrail, hole plot.


So anyone, any person or any group who admits that they are in fact receiving the KHOODEELAAR! communications about Crossrail would know that Khoodeelaar! means No to Crossrail.

How, then is it that a member of the ‘UK House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ ‘administration staff’ sent an e-mail on Thursday 17 january 2008 as follows?

QUOTING the e-mail dated Thursday 17 january 2008:


“Dear Mr Haque,
I can confirm that we have indeed been receiving your communications.
I understand from your communications that you do not wish to petition against the Crossrail Bill in the House of Lords. This being the case we have no assistance to offer you as we are here to advise those who do wish to petition on the form of their petition and procedures for deposit of petitions.”

UNQUOTING

Khoodeelaar! Analysis of the same [above]:

If they were ‘receiving’ the Khoodeelaar! communications from the Khoodeelaar! organiser Mr Haque, then how could they ‘understand’ that Khoodeelaar! or the Khoodeelaar! organiser did ‘not wish to petition against the Crossrail Bill in the House of Lords’?

Is that fundamental distortion something ti do with the unconstitutionality,m irrationality that the ‘Houses of Parliament’ USES as ‘democratic’ [!!!!] and ‘constitutional’ [!!!!!] tools for the undermining of basic truth?


Is the same factor or set of the similarly mala fide factors behind the distortion of the campaign position against Crossrail that we have referred to earlier today in relation to the lies as ‘mouthed’ by the chair of the ‘House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ in March 2008?

[To be continued]