The 'Crossrail Bill' 'Select Committee' in the UK House of Lords behaved against reason, suppressing the truth and defying decency of thought....

The 'Crossrail Bill' 'Select Committee' in the UK House of Lords behaved against reason, suppressing the truth and defying decency of thought....

By©Muhammad Haque
1715 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 9 june 2008


The indecency in the proceedings was exhibited in the undignified indulgence in plastic exchange of courtesy that took place between the bureaucracy of the select committee and the fronters of the promoters..on each ritualistic occasion ..

The exchanges were obscene. Just as they would be in any other place that is supposed to be the forum for the ethical, the accountable, the transparent advocacy of the rights, the thoughts and the demands of the people....


What took place on each occasion the committee sat in the so-called;d formal session was a disgrace. A scandal.

As on the occasion when an 80- year old objector to the Crossrail Bill was shouted at by the apparent chair of the committee...

The same apparent chair that had been in fact among the peers that peered into the abyss of the Crossrail hole site that they ‘visited’ on 20 February 2008...

That was in Hanbury Street off Brick Lane London E1.

So what ‘changed’ between 20 February 2008 and the day when the peer apparently chairing the Crossrail hole Bill Select Committee in the House of Lords, burst out, repeatedly and incoherently and most audibly unconstitutionally against and at the 80 year old woman who was there to oppose the Crossrail hole Bill as it affected the East End of ~London ?

Had the peer undergone a brain surgery?

Or had someone inserted something into the physical entity of his being where thinking, reasoning and constitutionality should be expected to exist, if not necessarily to function?


[To be continued]