When the 'locally elected' [?????????] Denise Jones, 'councillor' on Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole plot-INVITING Council in the deprivation-pervading, degeneration-perpetrating East End of London boasted in May 2008 that she had 'led' the Council that had 'secured Crossrail', did anyone hear that boast?
Was there anyone at all present in the room where Denise Jones made her Crossrail boast?
Could anyone in fact recall Denise Jones making that boast?
To find the answer to each of the questions that have arisen from Denise Jones’ Crossrail hole plot-inviting boast, a few central facts need to be put on the record in the updated forms here.
Firstly, the controlling clique on that Council that Denise Jones has belonged to as a ’councillor’ on Tower Hamlets Council has always denied that it had been in any way proactively involved in the Crossrail scam.
This has been their publicly stated position even in the context of the KHOODEELAAR! investigation of the past 55 months.
Whenever we have put the question - and we have put it in HUNDREDS of ways and on hundreds of separate consistent occasions - they have said that Crossrail is a central Government project or that Crossrail is a project created by the ‘London mayor’ [via “Transport for London’]. Never them. Never Tower Hamlets Council. Never Tower Hamlets Council even accepting responsibility for Crossrail let alone claiming proprietorship of the project....
Their ROLE, they have said, was, has been to ‘support’ Crossrail.
And to do so CONDITIONALLY. the 'condition' being, they have been crafty and unmistakably dishonest in their language, the ‘disruption would be minimised’ or kept to a minimum...
Then in September 2007 when they published their response to the KHOODEELAAR! Question put to formal ‘full Council’, they confirmed the same position. One more time....
We have exposed that LIE since it was perpetrated in that form. We shall re-examine THAT lie soon at the end of this series.
So what took place between September 2007 and May 2008 that gave Denise Jones the apparent ‘boldness’; to make that claim of her clique actually OWNING the Crossrail project so much so that she was able to boast that her ‘leadership’ [=her FRONTING the clique in control of the Council] had “SECURED CROSSRAIL’?
[To be continued]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment