By©Muhammad Haque
1815 Hrs GMT
1915 Hrs UK
London Sunday
25 May 2008
On the evidence of past analyses, Khoodeelaar! is confident about Gordon Brown’s potential to turn things around, as far as defusing Ca-Morn’s balloon goes.
But Brown must not tell lies, either. Brown may have begun to put on a smile, but his smile must be real. He must resolve to only smile when the people can freely smile too.
The worries, anxieties and stress that people experience daily, even more frequently, are real. So Brown’s empathy too must be real. True. Honest. Genuine
What Brown should do now is to show that he does not need to wait until things get too volatile before taking decisive action.
We say that the Crossrail hole agenda is stuffed with garbage to the point of unreality
We have said so for 54 months.
From Saturday 31 January 2004 to Sunday 25 May 2008
Now Brown should call Big Business bluff and defuse once and for all the CRASS idea.
He should say, Rod Eddington had the right direction.
And Browns Should say, the people have not called for it.
Crossrail is a toy. It is a ploy for Big Business. For City of London . For Canary Wharf... And for the careerist likes of the insecure, egoistic Ken Livingstone...
If Brown needs extra evidential ammunition, he can cite the ‘small businesses’ objections to the City of London-Ken Living stone ploy forcing the small businesses to make hefty contributions to Crossrail top the extra amount they have to pay to make the City of London’s stunt come true.
There are plenty of OTHER credible and legitimate sources that Brown can cite to destroy the CRASSRAIL hole plot-backing plug that Big Business planted for years via Ken Livingstone...
Brown can do it and he can get ADDED credit for defusing the CRASS rail imposition...
Khoodeelaar! has just summarised the way that Gordon Brown can begin to get back to the ‘prudent’ mode!
[To be continued]
Sunday, May 25, 2008
Khoodeelaar! solves Gordon Brown's 'connecting with the people' dilemma : Just scrap Crossrail hole plot and the people will know the difference...!
By©Muhammad Haque
1800 Hrs GMT
1900 Hrs UK
London Sunday
25 May 2008
On the evidence of past analyses, Khoodeelaar! is confident about Gordon Brown’s potential to turn things around, as far s defusing Ca-Morn’s balloon goes. But Brown must not tell lies, either. Brown may have begun to put on a smile, but his smile must be real. He must resolve to only smile when the people can freely smile. The worries, anxieties and stress that people experience daily, even more frequently, are real. So Brown’s empathy too must be real. True. Honest. genuine..
What Brown should do now is to show that he doe snot need to wait until, things get too violation before taking decisive action.
We say that the Crossrail hole agenda is stuffed with garbage to the point of unreality
We have said so for 54 months.
From Saturday 31 January 2004 to Sunday 25 May 2008
Now Brown should call Big Business bluff and defuse once and for all the CRASS idea.
He should say, Rod Eddington had the right direction.
And Browns Should say, the people have not called for it.
Crossrail is a toy. It is a ploy for Big Business. For City of Lo don . for Canary Wharf... And for the careerist the likes of the insecure, egoistic Ken Livingstone...
If Brown needs extra evidential ammunition , he can cite the ‘small businesses’ objections to the City of London-Ken Living stone ploy forcing the small businesses to make hefty contributions to Crossrail top the extra amount they have to pay to make the City of Lon don’s stunt come true.
There are plenty of sources that Brown can cite to destroy the plug that Big Business planted for years via Ken Livingstone...
Brown can do it and he can get ADDED credit for defusing the CRASS rail imposition...
Khoodeelaar! has just summarised the way that Gordon Brown can begin to get back to the ‘prudent’ mode!
[To be continued]
1800 Hrs GMT
1900 Hrs UK
London Sunday
25 May 2008
On the evidence of past analyses, Khoodeelaar! is confident about Gordon Brown’s potential to turn things around, as far s defusing Ca-Morn’s balloon goes. But Brown must not tell lies, either. Brown may have begun to put on a smile, but his smile must be real. He must resolve to only smile when the people can freely smile. The worries, anxieties and stress that people experience daily, even more frequently, are real. So Brown’s empathy too must be real. True. Honest. genuine..
What Brown should do now is to show that he doe snot need to wait until, things get too violation before taking decisive action.
We say that the Crossrail hole agenda is stuffed with garbage to the point of unreality
We have said so for 54 months.
From Saturday 31 January 2004 to Sunday 25 May 2008
Now Brown should call Big Business bluff and defuse once and for all the CRASS idea.
He should say, Rod Eddington had the right direction.
And Browns Should say, the people have not called for it.
Crossrail is a toy. It is a ploy for Big Business. For City of Lo don . for Canary Wharf... And for the careerist the likes of the insecure, egoistic Ken Livingstone...
If Brown needs extra evidential ammunition , he can cite the ‘small businesses’ objections to the City of London-Ken Living stone ploy forcing the small businesses to make hefty contributions to Crossrail top the extra amount they have to pay to make the City of Lon don’s stunt come true.
There are plenty of sources that Brown can cite to destroy the plug that Big Business planted for years via Ken Livingstone...
Brown can do it and he can get ADDED credit for defusing the CRASS rail imposition...
Khoodeelaar! has just summarised the way that Gordon Brown can begin to get back to the ‘prudent’ mode!
[To be continued]
Saturday, May 24, 2008
A ‘genial’-fronted mole may have been planted in 10 Downing Street London SW1 by one of Gordon Brown’s ‘challengers’.
A ‘genial’-fronted mole may have been planted in 10 Downing Street London SW1 by one of Gordon Brown’s ‘challengers’.
This is the rumour circulating in the inner city London!
What is the mole doing?
Getting as close to Gordon Brown as possible and using the info on Brown’s weaknesses - and his remaining strengths- and using the info accordingly
This is the rumour circulating in the inner city London!
What is the mole doing?
Getting as close to Gordon Brown as possible and using the info on Brown’s weaknesses - and his remaining strengths- and using the info accordingly
No 10 Downing Street - a mole may be operating for at least one of Gordon Brown's 'challengers'!
A ‘genial’-fronted mole may have been planted in 10 Downing Street London SW1 by one of Gordon Brown’s ‘challengers’.
This is the rumour circulating in the inner city London!
What is the mole doing?
Getting as close to Gordon Brown as possible and using the info on Brown’s weaknesses - and his remaining strengths- and using the info accordingly
This is the rumour circulating in the inner city London!
What is the mole doing?
Getting as close to Gordon Brown as possible and using the info on Brown’s weaknesses - and his remaining strengths- and using the info accordingly
Gordon Brown can listen to the East End campaign against Crossrail hole plot : He can scrap Crossrail and save his reputation... and a great deal more
By© Muhammad Haque
1450 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 24 May 2008
Days before the Crew and Nantwich by-election, I had said :
“Gordon Brown can only really ride the Crewe 'derailment' out by telling the truth and nothing but the truth.....And by scrapping all wrong deals...”
Now that the Crewe derailment has been confirmed and even the Guardian is openly touting for a challenger to Brown ti come out in the fashion of Geoffrey Howe’s stabbing of Margaret Thatcher, I have the following clear call to Brown: tell the truth Gordon and stop all attacks on people in ‘low’ income and people who are already disenfranchised in society.
Why?
Because if David Ca-Moron can make a ‘surprise’ appearance in the East End of London, right in the middle of the ‘most widely known multiracial, multi- cultural’ part of inner city London, and if he can do so on a spot inches away from ‘Atlee House’ in Toynbee Hall, in Commercial Street [in memory of Clement Atlee, one of Gordon Brown’s predecessor at No 10 Downing Street] and then make a stunt appearance look even semi- ‘credible’ as he promises to solve the problem of ‘homelessness’, then it must be time fro Gordon Brown to be told to listen really hard. And fast. And to act on what he is being told.
I am telling Gordon Brown from Brick Lane, which is the next street along side Commercial Street.
I am telling Brown that the David Ca-Morn circus is not as yet real. Ordinary people in these streets still do not relate to the Ca-Morn party.
But then the ordinary people do not relate to the former Labour Party now Blaired, either.
But there is an at atmosphere which Blair created . that atmosphere is one contempt for the time-servers appearing in the name of the former Labour Party, now Blaired and fronted by Gordon Brown.
There is thus an emptiness.
The ‘party people’ ‘who are successful’ [and thus the ‘visible, flaunted faces’ of the Blaired Party] in the East End of London are almost all of them linked with the local Blaired Tower Hamlets Council.
And the Councillors, especially those who are part of the operation of the corrupt Council’s controlling clique, are widely associated with misconduct, selfishness, sleaze and corruption and are perceived to be misbehaving selfish sleazy and corrupt.
If there is a challenge to Gordon Brown’s claim to legitimacy, the challenge itself can gain legitimacy from the continuation of the misconduct and sleaze that leads to this perception.
And Gordon Brown, by all accounts, is NOT getting this analysis from his ‘advisers’. Be the ‘advisers’ are placed in his kitchen. Be they placed in his cabinet. Or in between. Or on n the corridors at the expansive No 10 Downing Street.
Gordon Brown cannot retain any electoral credibility in the East End of London if the ‘best’ that the Blaired Party he fronts can do in Tower Hamlets is to resort to perhaps the most discredited parts of the population for ‘support.
As has been witnessed again in the past 3 weeks during the staging of the ‘local council clique equivalent’ of the fish market where individual councillors were being bought and sold in return for token [and cash-incentived] places in the hocus pocus cabinet on the Tower Hamlets Council.
So widely discredited is the Blaired party controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council that Ca-Moron’s man on the Council from the ca-Moron enclave so far sited on and around the Isle of Dogs, Peter Gould, decided last Wednesday [21 May 2008] to openly mock the entire process of ‘leader-making’ that formally took place in the Council chamber. The location was the antisocially sited, remote and antidemocratic ‘Mulberry Place’.
Although Peter Gould is not known to be a likely contender himself personally for any of the Council ward seats in the Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 area, it is conceivable that come any general election, his band and his brazenness will be positively treated by many voters, indeed a large chunk in the electorate, who would have been counted as ‘solid’ ‘traditional’ supporters of the former Labour Party even as recently as 1 May 2008.
The electoral and the political map is undergoing faster change in the East End fo London than Gordon Brown appears to know.
On all key issues, the ‘Blaired party timeservers’ operating in the name and at the expense of ordinary people in the East End fo London, are failing.
Whether by design or by ignorance, or by lack of basic abilities, basic knowledge and basic competence, is not going to excuse their failures and their misrepresenting the community.
The people have only one answer: TO VOTE THEM OUT at the available next election.
People, fed up with the open abuse of the peoples votes and 'trust' by the Blaired party councillors, will want to give the official Tories a chance.
Tower Hamlets Council is looking set to become a Tory-makrooty council. Sooner rather than later!
And that is a serious state of affairs.
Even to think that is to accept that ‘thanks’ [!!!!] to the misconduct, abuse and sleaze and lack of accountability by the Blaired party councillors for years in the East End of London, local people are ready to give the definitive thumps up to the official Tories so that the “official Tories can try to deliver...”
Once that happens, that will be the end of the former Labour Party in the East End of London.
Unless of course the Ca-Moron Conservatives commit a most unpredictable blunder of lasting repercussions against them!
[To be continued]
_______
ePolitics.com UK pubpushed the following report on Gordon Brown's sattemnt Froday 23 May 2008:
http://www.epolitix.com/EN/News/200805/dc641d70-74a1-4f1d-8abe-9d8f576f70d4.htm
"
Defiant Brown 'listening' to electorate
Gordon Brown has said he is listening to the electorate and brushed off questions suggesting Labour MPs may move against his leadership.
Journalists questioned him during a visit to London's St Thomas's hospital where Brown said the public wanted the government to address economic challenges.
Reacting to the hammering his party took in the Crewe and Nantwich by-election the prime minister said the message was "clear and unequivocal".
"People are concerned. They are concerned about food prices, concerned about petrol prices and concerned about what is happening to the economy."
He said that the government was working towards addressing these problems.
The prime minister added that his task was to take the economy through the difficult times ahead.
Asked how he could reassure his own backbenchers he said: "People know that the task ahead is to take the British economy through what are very difficult times, difficult times in every country.
"The message from the voters is very clear: people want us to address what are very real challenges, challenges of rising petrol prices when people go to the petrol station, challenges in the supermarket when people see rising food prices, challenges of gas and electricity bills going up as a result of oil prices going up.
"We will address these problems and the message that I think is absolutely clear and unequivocal is that the direction of the government is to address all these major concerns that people have.
"
1450 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 24 May 2008
Days before the Crew and Nantwich by-election, I had said :
“Gordon Brown can only really ride the Crewe 'derailment' out by telling the truth and nothing but the truth.....And by scrapping all wrong deals...”
Now that the Crewe derailment has been confirmed and even the Guardian is openly touting for a challenger to Brown ti come out in the fashion of Geoffrey Howe’s stabbing of Margaret Thatcher, I have the following clear call to Brown: tell the truth Gordon and stop all attacks on people in ‘low’ income and people who are already disenfranchised in society.
Why?
Because if David Ca-Moron can make a ‘surprise’ appearance in the East End of London, right in the middle of the ‘most widely known multiracial, multi- cultural’ part of inner city London, and if he can do so on a spot inches away from ‘Atlee House’ in Toynbee Hall, in Commercial Street [in memory of Clement Atlee, one of Gordon Brown’s predecessor at No 10 Downing Street] and then make a stunt appearance look even semi- ‘credible’ as he promises to solve the problem of ‘homelessness’, then it must be time fro Gordon Brown to be told to listen really hard. And fast. And to act on what he is being told.
I am telling Gordon Brown from Brick Lane, which is the next street along side Commercial Street.
I am telling Brown that the David Ca-Morn circus is not as yet real. Ordinary people in these streets still do not relate to the Ca-Morn party.
But then the ordinary people do not relate to the former Labour Party now Blaired, either.
But there is an at atmosphere which Blair created . that atmosphere is one contempt for the time-servers appearing in the name of the former Labour Party, now Blaired and fronted by Gordon Brown.
There is thus an emptiness.
The ‘party people’ ‘who are successful’ [and thus the ‘visible, flaunted faces’ of the Blaired Party] in the East End of London are almost all of them linked with the local Blaired Tower Hamlets Council.
And the Councillors, especially those who are part of the operation of the corrupt Council’s controlling clique, are widely associated with misconduct, selfishness, sleaze and corruption and are perceived to be misbehaving selfish sleazy and corrupt.
If there is a challenge to Gordon Brown’s claim to legitimacy, the challenge itself can gain legitimacy from the continuation of the misconduct and sleaze that leads to this perception.
And Gordon Brown, by all accounts, is NOT getting this analysis from his ‘advisers’. Be the ‘advisers’ are placed in his kitchen. Be they placed in his cabinet. Or in between. Or on n the corridors at the expansive No 10 Downing Street.
Gordon Brown cannot retain any electoral credibility in the East End of London if the ‘best’ that the Blaired Party he fronts can do in Tower Hamlets is to resort to perhaps the most discredited parts of the population for ‘support.
As has been witnessed again in the past 3 weeks during the staging of the ‘local council clique equivalent’ of the fish market where individual councillors were being bought and sold in return for token [and cash-incentived] places in the hocus pocus cabinet on the Tower Hamlets Council.
So widely discredited is the Blaired party controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council that Ca-Moron’s man on the Council from the ca-Moron enclave so far sited on and around the Isle of Dogs, Peter Gould, decided last Wednesday [21 May 2008] to openly mock the entire process of ‘leader-making’ that formally took place in the Council chamber. The location was the antisocially sited, remote and antidemocratic ‘Mulberry Place’.
Although Peter Gould is not known to be a likely contender himself personally for any of the Council ward seats in the Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 area, it is conceivable that come any general election, his band and his brazenness will be positively treated by many voters, indeed a large chunk in the electorate, who would have been counted as ‘solid’ ‘traditional’ supporters of the former Labour Party even as recently as 1 May 2008.
The electoral and the political map is undergoing faster change in the East End fo London than Gordon Brown appears to know.
On all key issues, the ‘Blaired party timeservers’ operating in the name and at the expense of ordinary people in the East End fo London, are failing.
Whether by design or by ignorance, or by lack of basic abilities, basic knowledge and basic competence, is not going to excuse their failures and their misrepresenting the community.
The people have only one answer: TO VOTE THEM OUT at the available next election.
People, fed up with the open abuse of the peoples votes and 'trust' by the Blaired party councillors, will want to give the official Tories a chance.
Tower Hamlets Council is looking set to become a Tory-makrooty council. Sooner rather than later!
And that is a serious state of affairs.
Even to think that is to accept that ‘thanks’ [!!!!] to the misconduct, abuse and sleaze and lack of accountability by the Blaired party councillors for years in the East End of London, local people are ready to give the definitive thumps up to the official Tories so that the “official Tories can try to deliver...”
Once that happens, that will be the end of the former Labour Party in the East End of London.
Unless of course the Ca-Moron Conservatives commit a most unpredictable blunder of lasting repercussions against them!
[To be continued]
_______
ePolitics.com UK pubpushed the following report on Gordon Brown's sattemnt Froday 23 May 2008:
http://www.epolitix.com/EN/News/200805/dc641d70-74a1-4f1d-8abe-9d8f576f70d4.htm
"
Defiant Brown 'listening' to electorate
Gordon Brown has said he is listening to the electorate and brushed off questions suggesting Labour MPs may move against his leadership.
Journalists questioned him during a visit to London's St Thomas's hospital where Brown said the public wanted the government to address economic challenges.
Reacting to the hammering his party took in the Crewe and Nantwich by-election the prime minister said the message was "clear and unequivocal".
"People are concerned. They are concerned about food prices, concerned about petrol prices and concerned about what is happening to the economy."
He said that the government was working towards addressing these problems.
The prime minister added that his task was to take the economy through the difficult times ahead.
Asked how he could reassure his own backbenchers he said: "People know that the task ahead is to take the British economy through what are very difficult times, difficult times in every country.
"The message from the voters is very clear: people want us to address what are very real challenges, challenges of rising petrol prices when people go to the petrol station, challenges in the supermarket when people see rising food prices, challenges of gas and electricity bills going up as a result of oil prices going up.
"We will address these problems and the message that I think is absolutely clear and unequivocal is that the direction of the government is to address all these major concerns that people have.
"
Scrapping the seriously flawed, Millennium Domex20 wasteful Crossrail will bring Gordon Brown much needed legitimacy....
Muhammad Haque tells Gordon Brown how he can resume a claim to legitimacy - by scrapping Crossrail NOW..[2].
By©Muhammad Haque
0930 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 24 May 2008
I am going to say this one more time to Gordon Brown: you were right to say no to ‘Crossrail’ for years when still the UK Finance Minister [‘Chancellor of the Exchequer’], Gordon. You were right because Crossrail is crass. It is uneconomic, as I have been telling you at least since February 2004. Crossrail is diversionary, as I have been telling you for years since February 2004. Crossrail is obsolete. Ditto. Crossrail is irrelevant. Ditto. Crossrail is a pretext for Big Business contractors to get their hands on £Billions of UK ‘public money’ under cover of ‘transport solution’. Crossrail is NOT a project that the people of London - people, ordinary people in ordinary London - have asked for. Crossrail is a City of London [as difference from any equivalent to a ‘borough council’ cove ring the overstated ‘square mile’ in London] interests-craved ploy. Crossrail is an MIC, Military Industrial Complex-linked excuse to rob the Uk treasury of £Billions to put into the pockets of the MIC operatives. Crossrail does not address even 5% of the ORDINARY London pub lic transport capacity needs. Crossrail is not rationally devised. it is not technologically appropriate to the existing transport infrastructure in and around London.....
I have made these points over the past 54 months in organising the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crossrail hole plot... You have known of this analysis., This argument, This case against Crossrail. And until it became clear that you were about to take over tenancy at 10 Downing Street under a year ago, you had remained consistently opposed to funding Crossrail from the public. You did not even say anything for the Crass project...Then you changed! As if by the touch of an illicit, no evil influence, you became different. You dropped your well-maintained guard. And you lost prudence...
The result was that a farrago of CRASS words and CRASS spin issued out of your mouth ...
As if those staged on locations outside Tower Hamlets had not been bad enough, you then agreed to make not one but several appearances on spots in East London alongside Ken Living stone and what you said at those appearances damaged your political image...
And it convinced Khoodeelaar! that you had been hijacked by the crafty, con-trickster Ken Living stone....
As I said, you would sink if you did not detach yourself from Ken Living stone....
Now that Livingstone has confessed [on that ‘ London mayor debate’ edition of the BBC TV ‘Question Time’] that he, Ken Livingstone in fact LIED and PLOTTED to get UK central Govt to pour in cash to the Olympics 2012 stunt, there is no need to go over the other thousands of items of contributory evidence to prove that Ken Livingstone HAS BEEN LYING and that nothing Livingstone says can be trusted.
If it is the peoples’ trust that is the top of the agenda for your attention, Gordon, then the start must be made by URGENTLY and speedily DITCHING Crossrail because it was spun for by a self-confessed liar who did not hesitate to embroil the UK public in a multi Billion £ swindle....
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
0930 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 24 May 2008
I am going to say this one more time to Gordon Brown: you were right to say no to ‘Crossrail’ for years when still the UK Finance Minister [‘Chancellor of the Exchequer’], Gordon. You were right because Crossrail is crass. It is uneconomic, as I have been telling you at least since February 2004. Crossrail is diversionary, as I have been telling you for years since February 2004. Crossrail is obsolete. Ditto. Crossrail is irrelevant. Ditto. Crossrail is a pretext for Big Business contractors to get their hands on £Billions of UK ‘public money’ under cover of ‘transport solution’. Crossrail is NOT a project that the people of London - people, ordinary people in ordinary London - have asked for. Crossrail is a City of London [as difference from any equivalent to a ‘borough council’ cove ring the overstated ‘square mile’ in London] interests-craved ploy. Crossrail is an MIC, Military Industrial Complex-linked excuse to rob the Uk treasury of £Billions to put into the pockets of the MIC operatives. Crossrail does not address even 5% of the ORDINARY London pub lic transport capacity needs. Crossrail is not rationally devised. it is not technologically appropriate to the existing transport infrastructure in and around London.....
I have made these points over the past 54 months in organising the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crossrail hole plot... You have known of this analysis., This argument, This case against Crossrail. And until it became clear that you were about to take over tenancy at 10 Downing Street under a year ago, you had remained consistently opposed to funding Crossrail from the public. You did not even say anything for the Crass project...Then you changed! As if by the touch of an illicit, no evil influence, you became different. You dropped your well-maintained guard. And you lost prudence...
The result was that a farrago of CRASS words and CRASS spin issued out of your mouth ...
As if those staged on locations outside Tower Hamlets had not been bad enough, you then agreed to make not one but several appearances on spots in East London alongside Ken Living stone and what you said at those appearances damaged your political image...
And it convinced Khoodeelaar! that you had been hijacked by the crafty, con-trickster Ken Living stone....
As I said, you would sink if you did not detach yourself from Ken Living stone....
Now that Livingstone has confessed [on that ‘ London mayor debate’ edition of the BBC TV ‘Question Time’] that he, Ken Livingstone in fact LIED and PLOTTED to get UK central Govt to pour in cash to the Olympics 2012 stunt, there is no need to go over the other thousands of items of contributory evidence to prove that Ken Livingstone HAS BEEN LYING and that nothing Livingstone says can be trusted.
If it is the peoples’ trust that is the top of the agenda for your attention, Gordon, then the start must be made by URGENTLY and speedily DITCHING Crossrail because it was spun for by a self-confessed liar who did not hesitate to embroil the UK public in a multi Billion £ swindle....
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! tells GORDON BROWN: If public trust is what you crave and needm
Muhammad Haque tells Gordon Brown how he can resume a claim to legitimacy - by scrapping Crossrail NOW..[2].
By©Muhammad Haque
0930 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 24 May 2008
I am going to say this one more time to Gordon Brown: you were right to say no to ‘Crossrail’ for years when still the UK Finance Minister [‘Chancellor of the Exchequer’], Gordon. You were right because Crossrail is crass. It is uneconomic, as I have been telling you at least since February 2004. Crossrail is diversionary, as I have been telling you for years since February 2004. Crossrail is obsolete. Ditto. Crossrail is irrelevant. Ditto. Crossrail is a pretext for Big Business contractors to get their hands on £Billions of UK ‘public money’ under cover of ‘transport solution’. Crossrail is NOT a project that the people of London - people, ordinary people in ordinary London - have asked for. Crossrail is a City of London [as difference from any equivalent to a ‘borough council’ cove ring the overstated ‘square mile’ in London] interests-craved ploy. Crossrail is an MIC, Military Industrial Complex-linked excuse to rob the Uk treasury of £Billions to put into the pockets of the MIC operatives. Crossrail does not address even 5% of the ORDINARY London pub lic transport capacity needs. Crossrail is not rationally devised. it is not technologically appropriate to the existing transport infrastructure in and around London.....
I have made these points over the past 54 months in organising the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crossrail hole plot... You have known of this analysis., This argument, This case against Crossrail. And until it became clear that you were about to take over tenancy at 10 Downing Street under a year ago, you had remained consistently opposed to funding Crossrail from the public. You did not even say anything for the Crass project...Then you changed! As if by the touch of an illicit, no evil influence, you became different. You dropped your well-maintained guard. And you lost prudence...
The result was that a farrago of CRASS words and CRASS spin issued out of your mouth ...
As if those staged on locations outside Tower Hamlets had not been bad enough, you then agreed to make not one but several appearances on spots in East London alongside Ken Living stone and what you said at those appearances damaged your political image...
And it convinced Khoodeelaar! that you had been hijacked by the crafty, con-trickster Ken Living stone....
As I said, you would sink if you did not detach yourself from Ken Living stone....
Now that Livingstone has confessed [on that ‘ London mayor debate’ edition of the BBC TV ‘Question Time’] that he, Ken Livingstone in fact LIED and PLOTTED to get UK central Govt to pour in cash to the Olympics 2012 stunt, there is no need to go over the other thousands of items of contributory evidence to prove that Ken Livingstone HAS BEEN LYING and that nothing Livingstone says can be trusted.
If it is the peoples’ trust that is the top of the agenda for your attention, Gordon, then the start must be made by URGENTLY and speedily DITCHING Crossrail because it was spun for by a self-confessed liar who did not hesitate to embroil the UK public in a multi Billion £ swindle....
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
0930 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 24 May 2008
I am going to say this one more time to Gordon Brown: you were right to say no to ‘Crossrail’ for years when still the UK Finance Minister [‘Chancellor of the Exchequer’], Gordon. You were right because Crossrail is crass. It is uneconomic, as I have been telling you at least since February 2004. Crossrail is diversionary, as I have been telling you for years since February 2004. Crossrail is obsolete. Ditto. Crossrail is irrelevant. Ditto. Crossrail is a pretext for Big Business contractors to get their hands on £Billions of UK ‘public money’ under cover of ‘transport solution’. Crossrail is NOT a project that the people of London - people, ordinary people in ordinary London - have asked for. Crossrail is a City of London [as difference from any equivalent to a ‘borough council’ cove ring the overstated ‘square mile’ in London] interests-craved ploy. Crossrail is an MIC, Military Industrial Complex-linked excuse to rob the Uk treasury of £Billions to put into the pockets of the MIC operatives. Crossrail does not address even 5% of the ORDINARY London pub lic transport capacity needs. Crossrail is not rationally devised. it is not technologically appropriate to the existing transport infrastructure in and around London.....
I have made these points over the past 54 months in organising the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crossrail hole plot... You have known of this analysis., This argument, This case against Crossrail. And until it became clear that you were about to take over tenancy at 10 Downing Street under a year ago, you had remained consistently opposed to funding Crossrail from the public. You did not even say anything for the Crass project...Then you changed! As if by the touch of an illicit, no evil influence, you became different. You dropped your well-maintained guard. And you lost prudence...
The result was that a farrago of CRASS words and CRASS spin issued out of your mouth ...
As if those staged on locations outside Tower Hamlets had not been bad enough, you then agreed to make not one but several appearances on spots in East London alongside Ken Living stone and what you said at those appearances damaged your political image...
And it convinced Khoodeelaar! that you had been hijacked by the crafty, con-trickster Ken Living stone....
As I said, you would sink if you did not detach yourself from Ken Living stone....
Now that Livingstone has confessed [on that ‘ London mayor debate’ edition of the BBC TV ‘Question Time’] that he, Ken Livingstone in fact LIED and PLOTTED to get UK central Govt to pour in cash to the Olympics 2012 stunt, there is no need to go over the other thousands of items of contributory evidence to prove that Ken Livingstone HAS BEEN LYING and that nothing Livingstone says can be trusted.
If it is the peoples’ trust that is the top of the agenda for your attention, Gordon, then the start must be made by URGENTLY and speedily DITCHING Crossrail because it was spun for by a self-confessed liar who did not hesitate to embroil the UK public in a multi Billion £ swindle....
[To be continued]
Thursday, May 22, 2008
Khoodeelaar! criminological diagnosis [intro] of the lying agenda operated by Big Business Crossrail hole plot-touts in UK Parliament
Khoodeelaar! the campaign against the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London, has been described in express terms, from the start of the campaign in January 2004.
KHOODEELAAR! NO TO CROSSRAIL
NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE
NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE BILL
NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE AGENDA
and in similar words and phrases
And the descriptive words have varied in length. But the core of the description has remained unaltered. And unalterable.
That KHOODEELAAR! stands in OPPOSITION to Crossrail.
That KHOODEELAAR!! Opposes Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London.
But the OPPOSITION is to the entirety of the CROSSRAIL package.
That we have initiated ALL the research ourselves into the key aspects of the defence of the community that Crossrail has been devised to attack.
That in all our public and published and private statements and communications, we have said NO to Crossrail hole. We have meant No to Crossrail, hole plot.
So anyone, any person or any group who admits that they are in fact receiving the KHOODEELAAR! communications about Crossrail would know that Khoodeelaar! means No to Crossrail.
How, then is it that a member of the ‘UK House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ ‘administration staff’ sent an e-mail on Thursday 17 january 2008 as follows?
QUOTING the e-mail dated Thursday 17 january 2008:
“Dear Mr Haque,
I can confirm that we have indeed been receiving your communications.
I understand from your communications that you do not wish to petition against the Crossrail Bill in the House of Lords. This being the case we have no assistance to offer you as we are here to advise those who do wish to petition on the form of their petition and procedures for deposit of petitions.”
UNQUOTING
Khoodeelaar! Analysis of the same [above]:
If they were ‘receiving’ the Khoodeelaar! communications from the Khoodeelaar! organiser Mr Haque, then how could they ‘understand’ that Khoodeelaar! or the Khoodeelaar! organiser did ‘not wish to petition against the Crossrail Bill in the House of Lords’?
Is that fundamental distortion something ti do with the unconstitutionality,m irrationality that the ‘Houses of Parliament’ USES as ‘democratic’ [!!!!] and ‘constitutional’ [!!!!!] tools for the undermining of basic truth?
Is the same factor or set of the similarly mala fide factors behind the distortion of the campaign position against Crossrail that we have referred to earlier today in relation to the lies as ‘mouthed’ by the chair of the ‘House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ in March 2008?
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! NO TO CROSSRAIL
NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE
NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE BILL
NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE AGENDA
and in similar words and phrases
And the descriptive words have varied in length. But the core of the description has remained unaltered. And unalterable.
That KHOODEELAAR! stands in OPPOSITION to Crossrail.
That KHOODEELAAR!! Opposes Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London.
But the OPPOSITION is to the entirety of the CROSSRAIL package.
That we have initiated ALL the research ourselves into the key aspects of the defence of the community that Crossrail has been devised to attack.
That in all our public and published and private statements and communications, we have said NO to Crossrail hole. We have meant No to Crossrail, hole plot.
So anyone, any person or any group who admits that they are in fact receiving the KHOODEELAAR! communications about Crossrail would know that Khoodeelaar! means No to Crossrail.
How, then is it that a member of the ‘UK House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ ‘administration staff’ sent an e-mail on Thursday 17 january 2008 as follows?
QUOTING the e-mail dated Thursday 17 january 2008:
“Dear Mr Haque,
I can confirm that we have indeed been receiving your communications.
I understand from your communications that you do not wish to petition against the Crossrail Bill in the House of Lords. This being the case we have no assistance to offer you as we are here to advise those who do wish to petition on the form of their petition and procedures for deposit of petitions.”
UNQUOTING
Khoodeelaar! Analysis of the same [above]:
If they were ‘receiving’ the Khoodeelaar! communications from the Khoodeelaar! organiser Mr Haque, then how could they ‘understand’ that Khoodeelaar! or the Khoodeelaar! organiser did ‘not wish to petition against the Crossrail Bill in the House of Lords’?
Is that fundamental distortion something ti do with the unconstitutionality,m irrationality that the ‘Houses of Parliament’ USES as ‘democratic’ [!!!!] and ‘constitutional’ [!!!!!] tools for the undermining of basic truth?
Is the same factor or set of the similarly mala fide factors behind the distortion of the campaign position against Crossrail that we have referred to earlier today in relation to the lies as ‘mouthed’ by the chair of the ‘House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ in March 2008?
[To be continued]
How Crossrail hole plot-inviter, inner city, deprived East London Tower Hamlets Council clique has been causing deprivation, hunger and starvation....
How Crossrail hole plot-inviter, inner city, deprived East London Tower Hamlets Council clique has been causing deprivation, hunger and starvation....
The KHOODEELAAR! Investigation reports due here, shortly
The KHOODEELAAR! Investigation reports due here, shortly
Khoodeelaar! EXPOSES the agenda of lies that Crossrail hole plot peddlers have been pushing through the UK Parliament...
Khoodeelaar! EXPOSES the agenda of lies that Crossrail hole plot peddlers have been pushing through the UK Parliament...Big Business has been undermining the standards that UK parliament should observe and uphold
1015 Hrs GMT 1115 Hrs UKTime London Thursday 22 May 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘Crossrail hole plot scheme, scam Bill’ [the ‘hybrid’ ‘Crossrail Bill’ now being put through the motion in the UK ‘legislative’ House of Lords] CAMPAIGN brings up to date the evidence, dated 13 November 2007 of just how comprehensively ethical, transparent, accurate and constitutional our campaign has been against the CRASS ‘Crossrail’ London scam.
We show this new and the latest updated evidence that the ‘utterances’ as delivered through the mouth of the formally placed chair of the ‘House of Lord Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ about Khoodeelaar! and about the Khoodeelaar! organiser in March 2008 when the Khoodeelaar! campaign representative was not present, WERE untrue, untruthful and very seriously STUPID.
Why STUPID?
Answer:
That the ‘Select committee’’ [the use of the ‘we’ in context] was not aware as to what the intentions were of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail Bill...
Because in those utterances, the maker of the utterances was claiming that the ‘select committee administration’ did not know what Khoodeelaar! had to say. Or what Khoodeelaar! would say. Or whether Khoodeelaar! would be represented in the proceedings ....
ALL of those were untrue. They were plain lies.
And they were STUPID because the man who made those utterances had already HEARD the Khoodeelaar! organiser summarise the Khoodeelaar! constitutional, evidential, technical, environmental;l, economic, political, social GROUNDS< reasons and arguments against and objections to Crossrail.
Where had the man heard it?
In the Hanbury STREET itself.
In February 2008, four members of the ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ in the House of Lords actually visited Hanbury Street [as they did other parts in London E1 area being defended by Khoodeelaar! against the Crossrail hole plot].
The man who made the false utterances in March 2008 in the Select Committee misrepresenting the Khoodeelaar! position, stood literally only yards from Muhammad Haque.
As did the other three members of that Committee. As did a number of others, included in the ‘entourage’ who included BOTH members of staff who were most noticeably associated with the Crossrail hole Bill ‘Select Committee’ in the House of Lords.
In that summary Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque made comments that created visibly positive responses and reactions from and in the 'visiting' PEERS!
And the entire event was RECORDED BY THREE camera crews from three TV stations!
And the Muhammad Haque speech was witnessed by at least 100 other people, most of them part of the Khoodeelaar! demonstration against Crossrail that took place at that time in the Hanbury Street....
The facts are that the Khoodeelaar! campaign had been during November, December 2007 in telephone e-mail contacts with the pre-formal stage personnel stated to be engaged in putting together the formal committee administration [which eventually came to be 'operational' during 2008].
Notice that word,’pre-formal’ devised by Khoodeelaar! to accurately reflect the situation at the time and for months.
That ‘pre-formal’ was the heading to over 30 specially authored representations sent to the ‘Crossrail Bill Select committee e-mail address’ BEFORE the idiotic references to Khoodeelaar! were made in March 2008.
ALL the ‘pre-formal’ communications were amply stated and there was NOTHING evidentially that could not be already discerned from these submissions about the rationale of the Khoodeelaar! opposition to the Crossrail scam.
ALL the communications were pro-active from Khoodeelaar! and that the communications were initiated by Khoodeelaar! to prepare al concerned in the ‘House of Lords of what Khoodeelaar! would be saying against Crossrail. And on WHY Khoodeelaar! would be saying against Crossrail. And HOW Khoodeelaar! would be saying what against Crossrail..
QUOTING the KHOODEELAAR! e-mail sent on Tuesday 13 November 2007
Sent: Tuesday 13 November 2007 13:20
To: [the UK legislative House of Lords] [personnel concerned with the still not formally announced ‘select committee’ on ‘the Crossrail bill’]
bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk;
lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk
Subject: Fnl version: FAO [personnel concerned with the still not formally announced ‘select committee’ on ‘the Crossrail bill’]
Re The Khoodeelaar! Formal
petition to be made:
320 Hrs Tuesday 13.11.2007
FAO [personnel concerned with the still not formally announced ‘select committee’ on ‘the Crossrail bill’]
The Khoodeelaar! Formal petition to
THE UK HOUSE OF LORDS AGAINST THE HYBRID 'CROSSRAIL
BILL'
Following our last e-mail sent to you on Monday, we
decided to send the material today, after discovering
some information about what was going on in the house
of commons.
We note the appearance of the 'secretary state fur
transport' Ruth Kelly before a HOUSE OF COMMONS
committee on Monday 12.11.2007.
In our petition [the procedure and formal structure,
addressing etc of which will be finalised upon our
receipt of the guidance that is being still prepared
by yourselves] , we shall refer to a number of the
factual issues that have arisen both during Ruth Kelly's
latest statements as well as the relevant questions
as put to her by members of that committee.
We are letting you know, at this stage by way of
information for any relevant advance preparation/s on
your [plural] parts, that our campaign AGAINST the
CROSSRAIL [HOLE PLOT] Bill has been thoroughly in
accord with the principles of universally verifiable
and recognisable constitutionality and that we have
found that such standards of constitutionality that we
have ourselves adhered to in our various and detailed
inquiries of the Secretary of State [as the promoter
to date] in this matter of our serious objections to
the contents and the implications of the 'Crossrail
Bill' have not been even acknowledged let alone
expressly recognised by the succession of holders of
the office of Secretary of state...]. This really is
the reason why we shall seek to draw to the attention
of the upper house committee concerned the most
serious flaws and defects in the present [the current] 'CRASSRail' London , scheme.
We are aware of the constitutional options beyond and
after the process in the Upper chamber is [has been]
formally concluded on this matter
At this time we are making appropriate demands and representations both to the Secretary of State as well as to any other backers of this
seriously irresponsibly promoted scheme that in our view will nit address the main transport needs of London and will be an unwarranted waste of a lot of money from the public sector.
Yours sincerely
Muhammad Haque
The Organiser
Khoodeelaar!1315 Hrs
GMT/UK
Tuesday 13.11.2007”
1015 Hrs GMT 1115 Hrs UKTime London Thursday 22 May 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘Crossrail hole plot scheme, scam Bill’ [the ‘hybrid’ ‘Crossrail Bill’ now being put through the motion in the UK ‘legislative’ House of Lords] CAMPAIGN brings up to date the evidence, dated 13 November 2007 of just how comprehensively ethical, transparent, accurate and constitutional our campaign has been against the CRASS ‘Crossrail’ London scam.
We show this new and the latest updated evidence that the ‘utterances’ as delivered through the mouth of the formally placed chair of the ‘House of Lord Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ about Khoodeelaar! and about the Khoodeelaar! organiser in March 2008 when the Khoodeelaar! campaign representative was not present, WERE untrue, untruthful and very seriously STUPID.
Why STUPID?
Answer:
That the ‘Select committee’’ [the use of the ‘we’ in context] was not aware as to what the intentions were of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail Bill...
Because in those utterances, the maker of the utterances was claiming that the ‘select committee administration’ did not know what Khoodeelaar! had to say. Or what Khoodeelaar! would say. Or whether Khoodeelaar! would be represented in the proceedings ....
ALL of those were untrue. They were plain lies.
And they were STUPID because the man who made those utterances had already HEARD the Khoodeelaar! organiser summarise the Khoodeelaar! constitutional, evidential, technical, environmental;l, economic, political, social GROUNDS< reasons and arguments against and objections to Crossrail.
Where had the man heard it?
In the Hanbury STREET itself.
In February 2008, four members of the ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ in the House of Lords actually visited Hanbury Street [as they did other parts in London E1 area being defended by Khoodeelaar! against the Crossrail hole plot].
The man who made the false utterances in March 2008 in the Select Committee misrepresenting the Khoodeelaar! position, stood literally only yards from Muhammad Haque.
As did the other three members of that Committee. As did a number of others, included in the ‘entourage’ who included BOTH members of staff who were most noticeably associated with the Crossrail hole Bill ‘Select Committee’ in the House of Lords.
In that summary Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque made comments that created visibly positive responses and reactions from and in the 'visiting' PEERS!
And the entire event was RECORDED BY THREE camera crews from three TV stations!
And the Muhammad Haque speech was witnessed by at least 100 other people, most of them part of the Khoodeelaar! demonstration against Crossrail that took place at that time in the Hanbury Street....
The facts are that the Khoodeelaar! campaign had been during November, December 2007 in telephone e-mail contacts with the pre-formal stage personnel stated to be engaged in putting together the formal committee administration [which eventually came to be 'operational' during 2008].
Notice that word,’pre-formal’ devised by Khoodeelaar! to accurately reflect the situation at the time and for months.
That ‘pre-formal’ was the heading to over 30 specially authored representations sent to the ‘Crossrail Bill Select committee e-mail address’ BEFORE the idiotic references to Khoodeelaar! were made in March 2008.
ALL the ‘pre-formal’ communications were amply stated and there was NOTHING evidentially that could not be already discerned from these submissions about the rationale of the Khoodeelaar! opposition to the Crossrail scam.
ALL the communications were pro-active from Khoodeelaar! and that the communications were initiated by Khoodeelaar! to prepare al concerned in the ‘House of Lords of what Khoodeelaar! would be saying against Crossrail. And on WHY Khoodeelaar! would be saying against Crossrail. And HOW Khoodeelaar! would be saying what against Crossrail..
QUOTING the KHOODEELAAR! e-mail sent on Tuesday 13 November 2007
Sent: Tuesday 13 November 2007 13:20
To: [the UK legislative House of Lords] [personnel concerned with the still not formally announced ‘select committee’ on ‘the Crossrail bill’]
bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk;
lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk
Subject: Fnl version: FAO [personnel concerned with the still not formally announced ‘select committee’ on ‘the Crossrail bill’]
Re The Khoodeelaar! Formal
petition to be made:
320 Hrs Tuesday 13.11.2007
FAO [personnel concerned with the still not formally announced ‘select committee’ on ‘the Crossrail bill’]
The Khoodeelaar! Formal petition to
THE UK HOUSE OF LORDS AGAINST THE HYBRID 'CROSSRAIL
BILL'
Following our last e-mail sent to you on Monday, we
decided to send the material today, after discovering
some information about what was going on in the house
of commons.
We note the appearance of the 'secretary state fur
transport' Ruth Kelly before a HOUSE OF COMMONS
committee on Monday 12.11.2007.
In our petition [the procedure and formal structure,
addressing etc of which will be finalised upon our
receipt of the guidance that is being still prepared
by yourselves] , we shall refer to a number of the
factual issues that have arisen both during Ruth Kelly's
latest statements as well as the relevant questions
as put to her by members of that committee.
We are letting you know, at this stage by way of
information for any relevant advance preparation/s on
your [plural] parts, that our campaign AGAINST the
CROSSRAIL [HOLE PLOT] Bill has been thoroughly in
accord with the principles of universally verifiable
and recognisable constitutionality and that we have
found that such standards of constitutionality that we
have ourselves adhered to in our various and detailed
inquiries of the Secretary of State [as the promoter
to date] in this matter of our serious objections to
the contents and the implications of the 'Crossrail
Bill' have not been even acknowledged let alone
expressly recognised by the succession of holders of
the office of Secretary of state...]. This really is
the reason why we shall seek to draw to the attention
of the upper house committee concerned the most
serious flaws and defects in the present [the current] 'CRASSRail' London , scheme.
We are aware of the constitutional options beyond and
after the process in the Upper chamber is [has been]
formally concluded on this matter
At this time we are making appropriate demands and representations both to the Secretary of State as well as to any other backers of this
seriously irresponsibly promoted scheme that in our view will nit address the main transport needs of London and will be an unwarranted waste of a lot of money from the public sector.
Yours sincerely
Muhammad Haque
The Organiser
Khoodeelaar!1315 Hrs
GMT/UK
Tuesday 13.11.2007”
Khoodeelaar! EXPOSES the agenda of lies that Crossrail hole plot peddlers have been pushing through the UK Parliament...
Khoodeelaar! EXPOSES the agenda of lies that Crossrail hole plot peddlers have been pushing through the UK Parliament...Big Business has been undermining the standards that UK parliament should observe and uphold
1015 Hrs GMT 1115 Hrs UKTime London Thursday 22 May 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘Crossrail hole plot scheme, scam Bill’ [the ‘hybrid’ ‘Crossrail Bill’ now being put through the motion in the UK ‘legislative’ House of Lords] CAMPAIGN brings up to date the evidence, dated 13 November 2007 of just how comprehensively ethical, transparent, accurate and constitutional our campaign has been against the CRASS ‘Crossrail’ London scam.
We show this new and the latest updated evidence that the ‘utterances’ as delivered through the mouth of the formally placed chair of the ‘House of Lord Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ about Khoodeelaar! and about the Khoodeelaar! organiser in March 2008 when the Khoodeelaar! campaign representative was not present, WERE untrue, untruthful and very seriously STUPID.
Why STUPID?
Answer:
That the ‘Select committee’’ [the use of the ‘we’ in context] was not aware as to what the intentions were of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail Bill...
Because in those utterances, the maker of the utterances was claiming that the ‘select committee administration’ did not know what Khoodeelaar! had to say. Or what Khoodeelaar! would say. Or whether Khoodeelaar! would be represented in the proceedings ....
ALL of those were untrue. They were plain lies.
And they were STUPID because the man who made those utterances had already HEARD the Khoodeelaar! organiser summarise the Khoodeelaar! constitutional, evidential, technical, environmental;l, economic, political, social to Crossrail.
Where had the man heard it?
In the Hanbury STREET itself.
In February 2008, four members of the ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ in the House of Lords actually visited Hanbury Street [as they did other parts in London E1 area being defended by Khoodeelaar! against the Crossrail hole plot].
The man who made the false utterances in March 2008 in the Select Committee misrepresenting the Khoodeelaar! position, stood literally only yards from Muhammad Haque.
As did the other three members of that Committee. As did a number of others, included in the ‘entourage’ who included BOTH members of staff who were most noticeably associated with the Crossrail hole Bill ‘Select Committee’ in the House of Lords.
In that summary Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque made comments that created visibly positive responses and reactions from and in the 'visiting' PEERS!
And the entire event was RECORDED BY THREE camera crews from three TV stations!
And the Muhammad Haque speech was witnessed by at least 100 other people, most of them part of the Khoodeelaar! demonstration against Crossrail that took place at that time in the Hanbury Street....
The facts are that the Khoodeelaar! campaign had been during November, December 2007 in telephone e-mail contacts with the pre-formal stage personnel stated to be engaged in putting together the formal committee administration [which eventually came to be 'operational' during 2008].
Notice that word,’pre-formal’ devised by Khoodeelaar! to accurately reflect the situation at the time and for months.
That ‘pre-formal’ was the heading to over 30 specially authored representations sent to the ‘Crossrail Bill Select committee e-mail address’ BEFORE the idiotic references to Khoodeelaar! were made in March 2008.
ALL the ‘pre-formal’ communications were amply stated and there was NOTHING evidentially that could not be already discerned from these submissions about the rationale of the Khoodeelaar! opposition to the Crossrail scam.
ALL the communications were pro-active from Khoodeelaar! and that the communications were initiated by Khoodeelaar! to prepare al concerned in the ‘House of Lords of what Khoodeelaar! would be saying against Crossrail. And on WHY Khoodeelaar! would be saying against Crossrail. And HOW Khoodeelaar! would be saying what against Crossrail..
QUOTING the KHOODEELAAR! e-mail sent on Tuesday 13 November 2007
Sent: Tuesday 13 November 2007 13:20
To: [the UK legislative House of Lords] [personnel concerned with the still not formally announced ‘select committee’ on ‘the Crossrail bill’]
bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk;
lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk
Subject: Fnl version: FAO [personnel concerned with the still not formally announced ‘select committee’ on ‘the Crossrail bill’]
Re The Khoodeelaar! Formal
petition to be made:
320 Hrs Tuesday 13.11.2007
FAO [personnel concerned with the still not formally announced ‘select committee’ on ‘the Crossrail bill’]
The Khoodeelaar! Formal petition to
THE UK HOUSE OF LORDS AGAINST THE HYBRID 'CROSSRAIL
BILL'
Following our last e-mail sent to you on Monday, we
decided to send the material today, after discovering
some information about what was going on in the house
of commons.
We note the appearance of the 'secretary state fur
transport' Ruth Kelly before a HOUSE OF COMMONS
committee on Monday 12.11.2007.
In our petition [the procedure and formal structure,
addressing etc of which will be finalised upon our
receipt of the guidance that is being still prepared
by yourselves] , we shall refer to a number of the
factual issues that have arisen both during Ruth Kelly's
latest statements as well as the relevant questions
as put to her by members of that committee.
We are letting you know, at this stage by way of
information for any relevant advance preparation/s on
your [plural] parts, that our campaign AGAINST the
CROSSRAIL [HOLE PLOT] Bill has been thoroughly in
accord with the principles of universally verifiable
and recognisable constitutionality and that we have
found that such standards of constitutionality that we
have ourselves adhered to in our various and detailed
inquiries of the Secretary of State [as the promoter
to date] in this matter of our serious objections to
the contents and the implications of the 'Crossrail
Bill' have not been even acknowledged let alone
expressly recognised by the succession of holders of
the office of Secretary of state...]. This really is
the reason why we shall seek to draw to the attention
of the upper house committee concerned the most
serious flaws and defects in the present [the current] 'CRASSRail' London , scheme.
We are aware of the constitutional options beyond and
after the process in the Upper chamber is [has been]
formally concluded on this matter
At this time we are making appropriate demands and representations both to the Secretary of State as well as to any other backers of this
seriously irresponsibly promoted scheme that in our view will nit address the main transport needs of London and will be an unwarranted waste of a lot of money from the public sector.
Yours sincerely
Muhammad Haque
The Organiser
Khoodeelaar!1315 Hrs
GMT/UK
Tuesday 13.11.2007”
1015 Hrs GMT 1115 Hrs UKTime London Thursday 22 May 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘Crossrail hole plot scheme, scam Bill’ [the ‘hybrid’ ‘Crossrail Bill’ now being put through the motion in the UK ‘legislative’ House of Lords] CAMPAIGN brings up to date the evidence, dated 13 November 2007 of just how comprehensively ethical, transparent, accurate and constitutional our campaign has been against the CRASS ‘Crossrail’ London scam.
We show this new and the latest updated evidence that the ‘utterances’ as delivered through the mouth of the formally placed chair of the ‘House of Lord Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ about Khoodeelaar! and about the Khoodeelaar! organiser in March 2008 when the Khoodeelaar! campaign representative was not present, WERE untrue, untruthful and very seriously STUPID.
Why STUPID?
Answer:
That the ‘Select committee’’ [the use of the ‘we’ in context] was not aware as to what the intentions were of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail Bill...
Because in those utterances, the maker of the utterances was claiming that the ‘select committee administration’ did not know what Khoodeelaar! had to say. Or what Khoodeelaar! would say. Or whether Khoodeelaar! would be represented in the proceedings ....
ALL of those were untrue. They were plain lies.
And they were STUPID because the man who made those utterances had already HEARD the Khoodeelaar! organiser summarise the Khoodeelaar! constitutional, evidential, technical, environmental;l, economic, political, social to Crossrail.
Where had the man heard it?
In the Hanbury STREET itself.
In February 2008, four members of the ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ in the House of Lords actually visited Hanbury Street [as they did other parts in London E1 area being defended by Khoodeelaar! against the Crossrail hole plot].
The man who made the false utterances in March 2008 in the Select Committee misrepresenting the Khoodeelaar! position, stood literally only yards from Muhammad Haque.
As did the other three members of that Committee. As did a number of others, included in the ‘entourage’ who included BOTH members of staff who were most noticeably associated with the Crossrail hole Bill ‘Select Committee’ in the House of Lords.
In that summary Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque made comments that created visibly positive responses and reactions from and in the 'visiting' PEERS!
And the entire event was RECORDED BY THREE camera crews from three TV stations!
And the Muhammad Haque speech was witnessed by at least 100 other people, most of them part of the Khoodeelaar! demonstration against Crossrail that took place at that time in the Hanbury Street....
The facts are that the Khoodeelaar! campaign had been during November, December 2007 in telephone e-mail contacts with the pre-formal stage personnel stated to be engaged in putting together the formal committee administration [which eventually came to be 'operational' during 2008].
Notice that word,’pre-formal’ devised by Khoodeelaar! to accurately reflect the situation at the time and for months.
That ‘pre-formal’ was the heading to over 30 specially authored representations sent to the ‘Crossrail Bill Select committee e-mail address’ BEFORE the idiotic references to Khoodeelaar! were made in March 2008.
ALL the ‘pre-formal’ communications were amply stated and there was NOTHING evidentially that could not be already discerned from these submissions about the rationale of the Khoodeelaar! opposition to the Crossrail scam.
ALL the communications were pro-active from Khoodeelaar! and that the communications were initiated by Khoodeelaar! to prepare al concerned in the ‘House of Lords of what Khoodeelaar! would be saying against Crossrail. And on WHY Khoodeelaar! would be saying against Crossrail. And HOW Khoodeelaar! would be saying what against Crossrail..
QUOTING the KHOODEELAAR! e-mail sent on Tuesday 13 November 2007
Sent: Tuesday 13 November 2007 13:20
To: [the UK legislative House of Lords] [personnel concerned with the still not formally announced ‘select committee’ on ‘the Crossrail bill’]
bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk;
lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk
Subject: Fnl version: FAO [personnel concerned with the still not formally announced ‘select committee’ on ‘the Crossrail bill’]
Re The Khoodeelaar! Formal
petition to be made:
320 Hrs Tuesday 13.11.2007
FAO [personnel concerned with the still not formally announced ‘select committee’ on ‘the Crossrail bill’]
The Khoodeelaar! Formal petition to
THE UK HOUSE OF LORDS AGAINST THE HYBRID 'CROSSRAIL
BILL'
Following our last e-mail sent to you on Monday, we
decided to send the material today, after discovering
some information about what was going on in the house
of commons.
We note the appearance of the 'secretary state fur
transport' Ruth Kelly before a HOUSE OF COMMONS
committee on Monday 12.11.2007.
In our petition [the procedure and formal structure,
addressing etc of which will be finalised upon our
receipt of the guidance that is being still prepared
by yourselves] , we shall refer to a number of the
factual issues that have arisen both during Ruth Kelly's
latest statements as well as the relevant questions
as put to her by members of that committee.
We are letting you know, at this stage by way of
information for any relevant advance preparation/s on
your [plural] parts, that our campaign AGAINST the
CROSSRAIL [HOLE PLOT] Bill has been thoroughly in
accord with the principles of universally verifiable
and recognisable constitutionality and that we have
found that such standards of constitutionality that we
have ourselves adhered to in our various and detailed
inquiries of the Secretary of State [as the promoter
to date] in this matter of our serious objections to
the contents and the implications of the 'Crossrail
Bill' have not been even acknowledged let alone
expressly recognised by the succession of holders of
the office of Secretary of state...]. This really is
the reason why we shall seek to draw to the attention
of the upper house committee concerned the most
serious flaws and defects in the present [the current] 'CRASSRail' London , scheme.
We are aware of the constitutional options beyond and
after the process in the Upper chamber is [has been]
formally concluded on this matter
At this time we are making appropriate demands and representations both to the Secretary of State as well as to any other backers of this
seriously irresponsibly promoted scheme that in our view will nit address the main transport needs of London and will be an unwarranted waste of a lot of money from the public sector.
Yours sincerely
Muhammad Haque
The Organiser
Khoodeelaar!1315 Hrs
GMT/UK
Tuesday 13.11.2007”
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole plot-inviting clique will NOT pass a motion against the Crossrail hole.
By©Muhammad Haque
1430 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday 21 May 2008
At tonight's meeting of the 'full council' Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole plot-inviting clique will NOT pass a motion against the Crossrail hole. This failure will not be due to lack of material. All it has to do is to use one of thousands of original, constitutional law documents that Khoodeelaar! has researched, written produced and made available to the Council in the past 52 months.
One of the documents that summarised the KHOODEELAAR! demands to the Council was published on the Indymedia web site and on associated internet sites in June 2006.
Here is what it contained ,s id and represented.
Khoodeelaar! legal and constitutional action to stop Crossrail hole Bill
13.06.2006 08:52
©Muhammad Haque /Khoodeelaar/CBRUK/LAWMEDIA 2006
No to CrossRail-hole Tower Hamlets Council programme Tues 13 June 2006
Khoodeelaar publishes second Motion for the full Council meeting on June 21
• On Monday 12 June 2006, Khoodeelaar! The Brick Land and Whitechapel London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Council delivered the first of a new series of Open Letters to Tower Hamlets councillors. They also included the texts of a draft motion for the full meeting of Tower Hamlets Council scheduled to be held on 21 June 2006.
• The demand for Tower Hamlets Council to Say No to CrossRail is the continuation of the demand made by the Khoodeelaar! campaign meeting held on 22 January 2006 which was supported by more than 1000 people who turned up to back the campaign against the CrossRail attack on the Brick Lane London E1 area.
• Today’s Khoodeelaar! Campaign activities also include the publication of the latest Khoodeelaar! exposé of the Crossrail-hole-plot backing controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council – and an updated analysis of that clique’s lies for Crossrail as confirmed before the ‘select committee’ on the ‘Crossrail Bill’.
• The Khoodeelaar! Letter to Tower Hamlets Councillors being published today [Tuesday 13 June 2006] will include the following legal and constitutional points:-
a. That Khoodeelaar! will take individual councillors to court – when the series of court actions is commenced as soon as possible after the conclusion of the current formal meetings of the ‘House of Commons Crossrail Bill select committee – and that the key ground against the particular councillors will be their roles in either misleading the community or making misleading communications or comments or statements to or about the community and for the CrossRail hole plan scheme project BilL
b. That Khoodeelaar! will support and where necessary initiate the full and comprehensive investigation of electoral fraud and offences that might have been committed at the 4 May 2006 elections.
The idea behind the Khoodeelaar! campaign has been a deeply moral and a highly constitutional one – to apply all the known and commonly perceived concepts of democratic representation by causing all holders of public office in the locality to acknowledge their duties in context and to actively engage in delivering the representation that they are in office to deliver.
In the campaign activities focussing on the Crossrail hole-inviting Tower Hamlets Council, we are today publishing details of the meeting of the Council ‘cabinet’ held on 6 October 2004.
That meeting was observed by over fifteen members of the various local groups opposed to the Crossrail hole plan. During that meeting, the then chair of Tower Hamlets Council’s regeneration committee or the ‘lead member’ for ‘regeneration’ made a number of statements that were described by the CBRUK Central Executive council as misleading.
CBRUK Central wrote to the Council’s chief executive Christine Gilbert putting on the record the organisation’s objections to the statements and role of Michael Keith. Christine Gilbert took her time ands did not reply until late in October 2004. When she did reply, she claimed that the interpretation by CBRUK Central of Michael Keith’s statement/s had been inaccurate. She asserted that she knew because she was present at the meeting concerned and that she also had seen the minutes of the meeting. When Cbrukcentral asked Gilbert to let them have a copy of the alleged version of the alleged minutes, Gilbert failed to deliver. That failure was not exceptional.
Throughout her time in the post of chief executive – a post she occupied after being eased into it by Michael Keith who had played a decisive role in Gilbert’s appointment to the post for which a better candidate was rejected – Gilbert persistently defied the democratic requirements and let the community stay in the dark about all crucial decisions that he took for the controlling clique. Of all the damaging acts, her role in prompting the Crossrail hole attack on the East End has been the most far-reaching one confirming the Big Business and City of London agenda to uproot the community out of its home and to make the East End ready for takeover…The Khoodeelaar! movement is here to help defeat that assault and betrayal.
© Muhammad Haque
e-mail: lawmedia@hotmail.com
Homepage: http://www.khoodeelaar.com
1430 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday 21 May 2008
At tonight's meeting of the 'full council' Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole plot-inviting clique will NOT pass a motion against the Crossrail hole. This failure will not be due to lack of material. All it has to do is to use one of thousands of original, constitutional law documents that Khoodeelaar! has researched, written produced and made available to the Council in the past 52 months.
One of the documents that summarised the KHOODEELAAR! demands to the Council was published on the Indymedia web site and on associated internet sites in June 2006.
Here is what it contained ,s id and represented.
Khoodeelaar! legal and constitutional action to stop Crossrail hole Bill
13.06.2006 08:52
©Muhammad Haque /Khoodeelaar/CBRUK/LAWMEDIA 2006
No to CrossRail-hole Tower Hamlets Council programme Tues 13 June 2006
Khoodeelaar publishes second Motion for the full Council meeting on June 21
• On Monday 12 June 2006, Khoodeelaar! The Brick Land and Whitechapel London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Council delivered the first of a new series of Open Letters to Tower Hamlets councillors. They also included the texts of a draft motion for the full meeting of Tower Hamlets Council scheduled to be held on 21 June 2006.
• The demand for Tower Hamlets Council to Say No to CrossRail is the continuation of the demand made by the Khoodeelaar! campaign meeting held on 22 January 2006 which was supported by more than 1000 people who turned up to back the campaign against the CrossRail attack on the Brick Lane London E1 area.
• Today’s Khoodeelaar! Campaign activities also include the publication of the latest Khoodeelaar! exposé of the Crossrail-hole-plot backing controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council – and an updated analysis of that clique’s lies for Crossrail as confirmed before the ‘select committee’ on the ‘Crossrail Bill’.
• The Khoodeelaar! Letter to Tower Hamlets Councillors being published today [Tuesday 13 June 2006] will include the following legal and constitutional points:-
a. That Khoodeelaar! will take individual councillors to court – when the series of court actions is commenced as soon as possible after the conclusion of the current formal meetings of the ‘House of Commons Crossrail Bill select committee – and that the key ground against the particular councillors will be their roles in either misleading the community or making misleading communications or comments or statements to or about the community and for the CrossRail hole plan scheme project BilL
b. That Khoodeelaar! will support and where necessary initiate the full and comprehensive investigation of electoral fraud and offences that might have been committed at the 4 May 2006 elections.
The idea behind the Khoodeelaar! campaign has been a deeply moral and a highly constitutional one – to apply all the known and commonly perceived concepts of democratic representation by causing all holders of public office in the locality to acknowledge their duties in context and to actively engage in delivering the representation that they are in office to deliver.
In the campaign activities focussing on the Crossrail hole-inviting Tower Hamlets Council, we are today publishing details of the meeting of the Council ‘cabinet’ held on 6 October 2004.
That meeting was observed by over fifteen members of the various local groups opposed to the Crossrail hole plan. During that meeting, the then chair of Tower Hamlets Council’s regeneration committee or the ‘lead member’ for ‘regeneration’ made a number of statements that were described by the CBRUK Central Executive council as misleading.
CBRUK Central wrote to the Council’s chief executive Christine Gilbert putting on the record the organisation’s objections to the statements and role of Michael Keith. Christine Gilbert took her time ands did not reply until late in October 2004. When she did reply, she claimed that the interpretation by CBRUK Central of Michael Keith’s statement/s had been inaccurate. She asserted that she knew because she was present at the meeting concerned and that she also had seen the minutes of the meeting. When Cbrukcentral asked Gilbert to let them have a copy of the alleged version of the alleged minutes, Gilbert failed to deliver. That failure was not exceptional.
Throughout her time in the post of chief executive – a post she occupied after being eased into it by Michael Keith who had played a decisive role in Gilbert’s appointment to the post for which a better candidate was rejected – Gilbert persistently defied the democratic requirements and let the community stay in the dark about all crucial decisions that he took for the controlling clique. Of all the damaging acts, her role in prompting the Crossrail hole attack on the East End has been the most far-reaching one confirming the Big Business and City of London agenda to uproot the community out of its home and to make the East End ready for takeover…The Khoodeelaar! movement is here to help defeat that assault and betrayal.
© Muhammad Haque
e-mail: lawmedia@hotmail.com
Homepage: http://www.khoodeelaar.com
Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole plot-inviting clique will NOT pass a motion against the Crossrail hole.
By©Muhammad Haque
1430 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday 21 May 2008
At tonight's meeting of the 'full council' Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole plot-inviting clique will NOT pass a motion against the Crossrail hole. This failure will not be due to lack of material. All it has to do is to use one of thousands fo original, constitutional law documents that Khoodeelaar! has researched, written produced and made available to the Council in the past 52 months.
One of the documents that summarised the KHOODEELAAR! demands to the Council was published on the Indymedia web site and on associated internet sites in June 2006.
Here is what it contained ,s id and represented.
Khoodeelaar! legal and constitutional action to stop Crossrail hole Bill
13.06.2006 08:52
©Muhammad Haque /Khoodeelaar/CBRUK/LAWMEDIA 2006
No to CrossRail-hole Tower Hamlets Council programme Tues 13 June 2006
Khoodeelaar publishes second Motion for the full Council meeting on June 21
• On Monday 12 June 2006, Khoodeelaar! The Brick Land and Whitechapel London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Council delivered the first of a new series of Open Letters to Tower Hamlets councillors. They also included the texts of a draft motion for the full meeting of Tower Hamlets Council scheduled to be held on 21 June 2006.
• The demand for Tower Hamlets Council to Say No to CrossRail is the continuation of the demand made by the Khoodeelaar! campaign meeting held on 22 January 2006 which was supported by more than 1000 people who turned up to back the campaign against the CrossRail attack on the Brick Lane London E1 area.
• Today’s Khoodeelaar! Campaign activities also include the publication of the latest Khoodeelaar! exposé of the Crossrail-hole-plot backing controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council – and an updated analysis of that clique’s lies for Crossrail as confirmed before the ‘select committee’ on the ‘Crossrail Bill’.
• The Khoodeelaar! Letter to Tower Hamlets Councillors being published today [Tuesday 13 June 2006] will include the following legal and constitutional points:-
a. That Khoodeelaar! will take individual councillors to court – when the series of court actions is commenced as soon as possible after the conclusion of the current formal meetings of the ‘House of Commons Crossrail Bill select committee – and that the key ground against the particular councillors will be their roles in either misleading the community or making misleading communications or comments or statements to or about the community and for the CrossRail hole plan scheme project BilL
b. That Khoodeelaar! will support and where necessary initiate the full and comprehensive investigation of electoral fraud and offences that might have been committed at the 4 May 2006 elections.
The idea behind the Khoodeelaar! campaign has been a deeply moral and a highly constitutional one – to apply all the known and commonly perceived concepts of democratic representation by causing all holders of public office in the locality to acknowledge their duties in context and to actively engage in delivering the representation that they are in office to deliver.
In the campaign activities focussing on the Crossrail hole-inviting Tower Hamlets Council, we are today publishing details of the meeting of the Council ‘cabinet’ held on 6 October 2004.
That meeting was observed by over fifteen members of the various local groups opposed to the Crossrail hole plan. During that meeting, the then chair of Tower Hamlets Council’s regeneration committee or the ‘lead member’ for ‘regeneration’ made a number of statements that were described by the CBRUK Central Executive council as misleading.
CBRUK Central wrote to the Council’s chief executive Christine Gilbert putting on the record the organisation’s objections to the statements and role of Michael Keith. Christine Gilbert took her time ands did not reply until late in October 2004. When she did reply, she claimed that the interpretation by CBRUK Central of Michael Keith’s statement/s had been inaccurate. She asserted that she knew because she was present at the meeting concerned and that she also had seen the minutes of the meeting. When Cbrukcentral asked Gilbert to let them have a copy of the alleged version of the alleged minutes, Gilbert failed to deliver. That failure was not exceptional.
Throughout her time in the post of chief executive – a post she occupied after being eased into it by Michael Keith who had played a decisive role in Gilbert’s appointment to the post for which a better candidate was rejected – Gilbert persistently defied the democratic requirements and let the community stay in the dark about all crucial decisions that he took for the controlling clique. Of all the damaging acts, her role in prompting the Crossrail hole attack on the East End has been the most far-reaching one confirming the Big Business and City of London agenda to uproot the community out of its home and to make the East End ready for takeover…The Khoodeelaar! movement is here to help defeat that assault and betrayal.
© Muhammad Haque
e-mail: lawmedia@hotmail.com
Homepage: http://www.khoodeelaar.com
1430 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday 21 May 2008
At tonight's meeting of the 'full council' Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole plot-inviting clique will NOT pass a motion against the Crossrail hole. This failure will not be due to lack of material. All it has to do is to use one of thousands fo original, constitutional law documents that Khoodeelaar! has researched, written produced and made available to the Council in the past 52 months.
One of the documents that summarised the KHOODEELAAR! demands to the Council was published on the Indymedia web site and on associated internet sites in June 2006.
Here is what it contained ,s id and represented.
Khoodeelaar! legal and constitutional action to stop Crossrail hole Bill
13.06.2006 08:52
©Muhammad Haque /Khoodeelaar/CBRUK/LAWMEDIA 2006
No to CrossRail-hole Tower Hamlets Council programme Tues 13 June 2006
Khoodeelaar publishes second Motion for the full Council meeting on June 21
• On Monday 12 June 2006, Khoodeelaar! The Brick Land and Whitechapel London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Council delivered the first of a new series of Open Letters to Tower Hamlets councillors. They also included the texts of a draft motion for the full meeting of Tower Hamlets Council scheduled to be held on 21 June 2006.
• The demand for Tower Hamlets Council to Say No to CrossRail is the continuation of the demand made by the Khoodeelaar! campaign meeting held on 22 January 2006 which was supported by more than 1000 people who turned up to back the campaign against the CrossRail attack on the Brick Lane London E1 area.
• Today’s Khoodeelaar! Campaign activities also include the publication of the latest Khoodeelaar! exposé of the Crossrail-hole-plot backing controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council – and an updated analysis of that clique’s lies for Crossrail as confirmed before the ‘select committee’ on the ‘Crossrail Bill’.
• The Khoodeelaar! Letter to Tower Hamlets Councillors being published today [Tuesday 13 June 2006] will include the following legal and constitutional points:-
a. That Khoodeelaar! will take individual councillors to court – when the series of court actions is commenced as soon as possible after the conclusion of the current formal meetings of the ‘House of Commons Crossrail Bill select committee – and that the key ground against the particular councillors will be their roles in either misleading the community or making misleading communications or comments or statements to or about the community and for the CrossRail hole plan scheme project BilL
b. That Khoodeelaar! will support and where necessary initiate the full and comprehensive investigation of electoral fraud and offences that might have been committed at the 4 May 2006 elections.
The idea behind the Khoodeelaar! campaign has been a deeply moral and a highly constitutional one – to apply all the known and commonly perceived concepts of democratic representation by causing all holders of public office in the locality to acknowledge their duties in context and to actively engage in delivering the representation that they are in office to deliver.
In the campaign activities focussing on the Crossrail hole-inviting Tower Hamlets Council, we are today publishing details of the meeting of the Council ‘cabinet’ held on 6 October 2004.
That meeting was observed by over fifteen members of the various local groups opposed to the Crossrail hole plan. During that meeting, the then chair of Tower Hamlets Council’s regeneration committee or the ‘lead member’ for ‘regeneration’ made a number of statements that were described by the CBRUK Central Executive council as misleading.
CBRUK Central wrote to the Council’s chief executive Christine Gilbert putting on the record the organisation’s objections to the statements and role of Michael Keith. Christine Gilbert took her time ands did not reply until late in October 2004. When she did reply, she claimed that the interpretation by CBRUK Central of Michael Keith’s statement/s had been inaccurate. She asserted that she knew because she was present at the meeting concerned and that she also had seen the minutes of the meeting. When Cbrukcentral asked Gilbert to let them have a copy of the alleged version of the alleged minutes, Gilbert failed to deliver. That failure was not exceptional.
Throughout her time in the post of chief executive – a post she occupied after being eased into it by Michael Keith who had played a decisive role in Gilbert’s appointment to the post for which a better candidate was rejected – Gilbert persistently defied the democratic requirements and let the community stay in the dark about all crucial decisions that he took for the controlling clique. Of all the damaging acts, her role in prompting the Crossrail hole attack on the East End has been the most far-reaching one confirming the Big Business and City of London agenda to uproot the community out of its home and to make the East End ready for takeover…The Khoodeelaar! movement is here to help defeat that assault and betrayal.
© Muhammad Haque
e-mail: lawmedia@hotmail.com
Homepage: http://www.khoodeelaar.com
Crossrail hole plot-inviting clique allows a ritual 'full council' display in Tower Hamlets tonight....
How KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail hole Bill ['House of Lords'] also defends the constitutional rights of ALL of the East End of London....
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill and the campaign against the ‘Crossrail hole plot-inviting clique on the local Tower Hamlets Council’ is planning to observe the ‘proceedings’ of the formal ‘full’ council, that is scheduled to be held this evening [Wednesday 21 May 2008].
It is untrue to say that only because the clique calls the routine ‘the full council’ so therefore the actual proceedings are genuine or truthful.
No democratic audit takes place due to any group of councillors on the floor of that ‘full meeting’.
It is a charade. And a very worrying one as far as the people in the Borough are concerned.
Remember: Tower Hamlets is listed as one fo the most deprived three boroughs in all fo England.
But you will be hard pressed to know this from the behaviour fo the corrupt clique that controls the actual agenda or the actual conduct fo the ‘controlling group’
It is a sham meeting, as the Council is not at all democratically composed. Not only is there a career-linked exclusion of democracy from the agenda and from the way that the clique operates; there is also the deficit of democracy as there is no competent opposition.
What formally listed opposition there is does not amount to opposition at all.
There is also the additional almost painfully ridiculous spectacle.
There is the Tory group which has been given undeserved expansion by a defection ‘thanks’ to the ‘ ‘SWP’ and THEIR incompetent in the name of the community corresponding to the London borough fo Tower Hamlets.
Then there is a truncated form fo what used to be the numerically the second largest group as based on the May 2006 council election.
Followed by the staggeringly shrinking group called the Lib Dems. With THEIR latest contribution [or yield !!!!] to the cause of defections!!!! - what a consistently hilarious phenomenon we have on display in Tower Hamlets - there are now as ‘many as four’ Lib Dems still listed on the Tower Hamlets Council.
Finally there is the most minimal ‘councillors from a political party or group, numbering only three. Oliur Rahman and his two colleagues from the splinter group of what used to be called ‘Respect’ .
Now, look at their names [the ‘parties’ or groups] and there is no way that politically or ideologically, they could constitute a UNITED ‘working group’. And they are not.
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill and the campaign against the ‘Crossrail hole plot-inviting clique on the local Tower Hamlets Council’ is planning to observe the ‘proceedings’ of the formal ‘full’ council, that is scheduled to be held this evening [Wednesday 21 May 2008].
It is untrue to say that only because the clique calls the routine ‘the full council’ so therefore the actual proceedings are genuine or truthful.
No democratic audit takes place due to any group of councillors on the floor of that ‘full meeting’.
It is a charade. And a very worrying one as far as the people in the Borough are concerned.
Remember: Tower Hamlets is listed as one fo the most deprived three boroughs in all fo England.
But you will be hard pressed to know this from the behaviour fo the corrupt clique that controls the actual agenda or the actual conduct fo the ‘controlling group’
It is a sham meeting, as the Council is not at all democratically composed. Not only is there a career-linked exclusion of democracy from the agenda and from the way that the clique operates; there is also the deficit of democracy as there is no competent opposition.
What formally listed opposition there is does not amount to opposition at all.
There is also the additional almost painfully ridiculous spectacle.
There is the Tory group which has been given undeserved expansion by a defection ‘thanks’ to the ‘ ‘SWP’ and THEIR incompetent in the name of the community corresponding to the London borough fo Tower Hamlets.
Then there is a truncated form fo what used to be the numerically the second largest group as based on the May 2006 council election.
Followed by the staggeringly shrinking group called the Lib Dems. With THEIR latest contribution [or yield !!!!] to the cause of defections!!!! - what a consistently hilarious phenomenon we have on display in Tower Hamlets - there are now as ‘many as four’ Lib Dems still listed on the Tower Hamlets Council.
Finally there is the most minimal ‘councillors from a political party or group, numbering only three. Oliur Rahman and his two colleagues from the splinter group of what used to be called ‘Respect’ .
Now, look at their names [the ‘parties’ or groups] and there is no way that politically or ideologically, they could constitute a UNITED ‘working group’. And they are not.
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! has shown to Brown for over 4 years that CRASSly conceived 'Crossrail' is a wasteful scam... Not too late to Scrap Crossrail NOW
By©Muhammad Haque
0955 Hrs GMT
London Wednesday 21 May 2008
Khoodeelaar! has made Gordon Brown aware for over 4 years now, that his credibility would be imperilled by imprudent decision. Crossrail is an imprudent scheme.
It must be scrapped. And for good, sound reason. We have given him original material evidence showing how that would be done. Since February 2004 when we began writing to Gordon Brown about the fundamental flaws in all key aspects of the ‘Crossrail ‘ hole scam, we have made available to him All the substantive evidence about the irrelevance of Crossrail, to the transport needs of London and we have argued, way ahead of any other organisation, 'campaign' [we are looking to find a comparable one with the comprehensive engagement on the matter and on all the issues...] or individual, that the central UK state [that is the public] money and the state support to any scheme involving so many £Billions of public central UK state [that is the public] money,m must be agreed only after the most exhaustive of examination of all the options, alternatives and solutions known at the current time.
We have said that the UK Houses of Parliament must be allowed to openly, freely and demonstrably thoroughly debate all the contents, the purpose and the implications of the ‘Crossrail Hole Bill.
Note the concepts and the implications:
Purpose
Contents and
Implications....
Has Gordon Brow listened?
Surprisingly,m we would say that Gordon Brown, on this matter, almost did listen.
Up until the time that he was getting the heavy-duty sub-racist [anti-Scottish] poisonous missives from Ken Livingstone in 2007.
So we are prepared to give Gordon Brown credit where credit was due - jp until the item when he played into Livingstone's sub-racist and the lying ploy in 2007.
And by doing so, Gordon Brown squandered a significant moment when he could have called the liar Ken Livingstone’s bluff and could have saved himself a good deal of grief,.
After ALL that, we are saying today 21 May 2008, on the even of Crew and Nantwich, that it is still not too late. Gordon Brown can still salvage himself and he can do that by scrapping Crassrail on then ground that it is uneconomic, ill thought out, ill conceived, irrelevant, obsolete, undemocratic...... scam ....
[To be continued]
0955 Hrs GMT
London Wednesday 21 May 2008
Khoodeelaar! has made Gordon Brown aware for over 4 years now, that his credibility would be imperilled by imprudent decision. Crossrail is an imprudent scheme.
It must be scrapped. And for good, sound reason. We have given him original material evidence showing how that would be done. Since February 2004 when we began writing to Gordon Brown about the fundamental flaws in all key aspects of the ‘Crossrail ‘ hole scam, we have made available to him All the substantive evidence about the irrelevance of Crossrail, to the transport needs of London and we have argued, way ahead of any other organisation, 'campaign' [we are looking to find a comparable one with the comprehensive engagement on the matter and on all the issues...] or individual, that the central UK state [that is the public] money and the state support to any scheme involving so many £Billions of public central UK state [that is the public] money,m must be agreed only after the most exhaustive of examination of all the options, alternatives and solutions known at the current time.
We have said that the UK Houses of Parliament must be allowed to openly, freely and demonstrably thoroughly debate all the contents, the purpose and the implications of the ‘Crossrail Hole Bill.
Note the concepts and the implications:
Purpose
Contents and
Implications....
Has Gordon Brow listened?
Surprisingly,m we would say that Gordon Brown, on this matter, almost did listen.
Up until the time that he was getting the heavy-duty sub-racist [anti-Scottish] poisonous missives from Ken Livingstone in 2007.
So we are prepared to give Gordon Brown credit where credit was due - jp until the item when he played into Livingstone's sub-racist and the lying ploy in 2007.
And by doing so, Gordon Brown squandered a significant moment when he could have called the liar Ken Livingstone’s bluff and could have saved himself a good deal of grief,.
After ALL that, we are saying today 21 May 2008, on the even of Crew and Nantwich, that it is still not too late. Gordon Brown can still salvage himself and he can do that by scrapping Crassrail on then ground that it is uneconomic, ill thought out, ill conceived, irrelevant, obsolete, undemocratic...... scam ....
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law opposition to the UK House of Lords 'Crossrail Bill' 'Select Committee'
KHOODEELAAR! ACTION ARCHIVE update at 0815 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 21 May 2008
How the KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law opposition to the UK House of Lords 'Crossrail Bill' has been conducted And how [ as we shall be publishing from now on ] the evidence of the communications and representations by and from Khoodeelaar! has been obstructed by the corrupt bureaucracy and stooges of Big Business Crossrail, hole plot that have been installed in the House of Lords.....
The following one is dated 8 November 2007, MONTHS before the 'Crossrail Bill' was formally in the 'House of Lords'
"
Dear ‘House of Lords’ ‘committee’ staff member concerned
Re: The CROSSRAIL Bill and the Khoodeelaar! Constitutional action against it
I must first of all record my appreciation that you actually spoke at some length in explaining the various aspects of the procedures today. I say this because the previous experiences we had of trying to represent our constitutional and the legal rights to the UK parliament were not as positive.
I hope that when the matter is eventually in the House of Lords, we shall not be obstructed or otherwise violated, diverted, frustrated or denied by any member of the committee staff or by anyone else involved, concerned or engaged.
Please find below the draft [that I have just written] of a new petition that we are putting to our 'local' council, - the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets . I am sending you this to show the general depth and range of our opposition to the Crossrail Bill.
As you stated today that the various formal items were undergoing preparation and that you would let us know once they are ready for dissemination to all concerned, I have arranged for our campaign to make communications to your office as soon as that is formally invited.
In the meantime, I wish you a pleasant day and a positive period during the forthcoming and the relevant proceedings.
Yours sincerely
Muhammad Haque
Honorary Organiser
The Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail hole plot scam scheme Bill [the 'Crossrail Bill']
1400 HRH GMT
London
Thursday 8 November 2007
"
How the KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law opposition to the UK House of Lords 'Crossrail Bill' has been conducted And how [ as we shall be publishing from now on ] the evidence of the communications and representations by and from Khoodeelaar! has been obstructed by the corrupt bureaucracy and stooges of Big Business Crossrail, hole plot that have been installed in the House of Lords.....
The following one is dated 8 November 2007, MONTHS before the 'Crossrail Bill' was formally in the 'House of Lords'
"
Dear ‘House of Lords’ ‘committee’ staff member concerned
Re: The CROSSRAIL Bill and the Khoodeelaar! Constitutional action against it
I must first of all record my appreciation that you actually spoke at some length in explaining the various aspects of the procedures today. I say this because the previous experiences we had of trying to represent our constitutional and the legal rights to the UK parliament were not as positive.
I hope that when the matter is eventually in the House of Lords, we shall not be obstructed or otherwise violated, diverted, frustrated or denied by any member of the committee staff or by anyone else involved, concerned or engaged.
Please find below the draft [that I have just written] of a new petition that we are putting to our 'local' council, - the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets . I am sending you this to show the general depth and range of our opposition to the Crossrail Bill.
As you stated today that the various formal items were undergoing preparation and that you would let us know once they are ready for dissemination to all concerned, I have arranged for our campaign to make communications to your office as soon as that is formally invited.
In the meantime, I wish you a pleasant day and a positive period during the forthcoming and the relevant proceedings.
Yours sincerely
Muhammad Haque
Honorary Organiser
The Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail hole plot scam scheme Bill [the 'Crossrail Bill']
1400 HRH GMT
London
Thursday 8 November 2007
"
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Muhammad Haque tells Gordon Brown how he can resume a claim to prudence - by scrapping Crossrail NOW...
THE MUHAMMAD HAQUE economic commentary about Gordon Brown’s status in prudence- How Brown can resume any claim to being prudent by NOW scrapping the seriously flawed CRASSrail scam...
By©Muhammad Haque
1800 Hrs GMT
London Tuesday 20 May 2008
For over four years now, and with not a single £Million [or indeed a single £] in fees, in fact ofr no fees whatever, Khoodeelaar! has advised Gordon Brown on the maniofld defects, flaws and wastefulness attaching to CRASSrail.
Here is a list of the key points we have made based on our findings:-
That CROSSRAIl was NOt the same thing as the transport needs of London
That the Crossrail scheme as it ever was, was not relevant to what NEEDs to be done.
That the existing railway,y infrastructure in and around LOndon, which carried or was needed ofr the carrying of MANY times more passengers than the projected Crossrail, was in urgent need of re[air, maintenance and improvement.
That there was no demand among ordinary London people ofr a scheme like Crossrail.
that the Crossrail plot was being peddled by some very strange and suspect sources. Mainly lobbys.
That the City of London was not an economically productive entity. That the dire transport infrastructure in London was being mis-sued by Big construction and engineering conglomerates who were keen to create a Multi Billion pretext to grab the contracts. That NO evidence has been produced, even up to today, tuesday 20 may 2008, to show a correlation between a Crossrail scheme - being absent or present- and the level of economic productivity and activity in London...
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1800 Hrs GMT
London Tuesday 20 May 2008
For over four years now, and with not a single £Million [or indeed a single £] in fees, in fact ofr no fees whatever, Khoodeelaar! has advised Gordon Brown on the maniofld defects, flaws and wastefulness attaching to CRASSrail.
Here is a list of the key points we have made based on our findings:-
That CROSSRAIl was NOt the same thing as the transport needs of London
That the Crossrail scheme as it ever was, was not relevant to what NEEDs to be done.
That the existing railway,y infrastructure in and around LOndon, which carried or was needed ofr the carrying of MANY times more passengers than the projected Crossrail, was in urgent need of re[air, maintenance and improvement.
That there was no demand among ordinary London people ofr a scheme like Crossrail.
that the Crossrail plot was being peddled by some very strange and suspect sources. Mainly lobbys.
That the City of London was not an economically productive entity. That the dire transport infrastructure in London was being mis-sued by Big construction and engineering conglomerates who were keen to create a Multi Billion pretext to grab the contracts. That NO evidence has been produced, even up to today, tuesday 20 may 2008, to show a correlation between a Crossrail scheme - being absent or present- and the level of economic productivity and activity in London...
[To be continued]
Muhammad Haque tells Gordon Brown how Brown can resume a claim to prudence - by scrapping Crossrail NOW...
THE MUHAMMAD HAQUE economic commentary about Gordon Brown’s status in prudence- How Brown can resume any claim to being prudent by NOW scrapping the seriously flawed CRASSrail scam...
By©Muhammad Haque
1800 Hrs GMT
London Tuesday 20 May 2008
For over four years now, and with not a single £Million [or indeed a single £] in fees, in fact ofr no fees whatever, Khoodeelaar! has advised Gordon Brown on the maniofld defects, flaws and wastefulness attaching to CRASSrail.
Here is a list of the key points we have made based on our findings:-
That CROSSRAIl was NOt the same thing as the transport needs of London
That the Crossrail scheme as it ever was, was not relevant to what NEEDs to be done.
That the existing railway,y infrastructure in and around LOndon, which carried or was needed ofr the carrying of MANY times more passengers than the projected Crossrail, was in urgent need of re[air, maintenance and improvement.
That there was no demand among ordinary London people ofr a scheme like Crossrail.
that the Crossrail plot was being peddled by some very strange and suspect sources. Mainly lobbys.
That the City of London was not an economically productive entity. That the dire transport infrastructure in London was being mis-sued by Big construction and engineering conglomerates who were keen to create a Multi Billion pretext to grab the contracts. That NO evidence has been produced, even up to today, tuesday 20 may 2008, to show a correlation between a Crossrail scheme - being absent or present- and the level of economic productivity and activity in London...
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1800 Hrs GMT
London Tuesday 20 May 2008
For over four years now, and with not a single £Million [or indeed a single £] in fees, in fact ofr no fees whatever, Khoodeelaar! has advised Gordon Brown on the maniofld defects, flaws and wastefulness attaching to CRASSrail.
Here is a list of the key points we have made based on our findings:-
That CROSSRAIl was NOt the same thing as the transport needs of London
That the Crossrail scheme as it ever was, was not relevant to what NEEDs to be done.
That the existing railway,y infrastructure in and around LOndon, which carried or was needed ofr the carrying of MANY times more passengers than the projected Crossrail, was in urgent need of re[air, maintenance and improvement.
That there was no demand among ordinary London people ofr a scheme like Crossrail.
that the Crossrail plot was being peddled by some very strange and suspect sources. Mainly lobbys.
That the City of London was not an economically productive entity. That the dire transport infrastructure in London was being mis-sued by Big construction and engineering conglomerates who were keen to create a Multi Billion pretext to grab the contracts. That NO evidence has been produced, even up to today, tuesday 20 may 2008, to show a correlation between a Crossrail scheme - being absent or present- and the level of economic productivity and activity in London...
[To be continued]
Gordon Brown must not fake it about Gwyneth Dunwoody at all Did he speak out in defence of her when Blair repeatedly tried to oust her?
By©Muhammad Haque
1555 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday 20 May 2008
Gordon Brown must not fake it about Gwyneth Dunwoody at all.
Did he speak out in defence of her when Blair repeatedly tried to oust her?
Brown is reported as saying about Gwyneth's daughter:
"She is an independent woman with a sense of purpose," Mr Brown said, speaking from No 10.
"She wants to represent the people of Crewe and Nantwich in the kind of way her mother did, as an independent and strong fighting presence in the House of Commons. I am looking forward-to working with her."
But what did Brown do when Gwyneth fought Blair off?
What lessons are there on transport that should be learnt from the stand that Gwyneth Dunwoody took about standing up to Big Business influence on Govt transport policy?
[To be continued]
1555 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday 20 May 2008
Gordon Brown must not fake it about Gwyneth Dunwoody at all.
Did he speak out in defence of her when Blair repeatedly tried to oust her?
Brown is reported as saying about Gwyneth's daughter:
"She is an independent woman with a sense of purpose," Mr Brown said, speaking from No 10.
"She wants to represent the people of Crewe and Nantwich in the kind of way her mother did, as an independent and strong fighting presence in the House of Commons. I am looking forward-to working with her."
But what did Brown do when Gwyneth fought Blair off?
What lessons are there on transport that should be learnt from the stand that Gwyneth Dunwoody took about standing up to Big Business influence on Govt transport policy?
[To be continued]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the 'Crossrail Bill' [a Bill in UK Parliament]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SGqe5VQwLHI/AAAAAAAABfc/MEjjMWby2dc/S226/Khoodeelaar!+try+this+logo.gif)
![London [Rupert Murdoched] Times, Wed. 7 May 2008](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitiFRN6uO_MOdYMby0s7ow2zcBaewOKfl3k4QdCPcahu1IKXx6sl7Gs4aO9VrAhN8gQJvYb1a2JnODsTUsMks_LtoZVuqc64whMkMitNKVz1bijPST853uNwRNG8x2PVFl1kqRez8M3b-j/s226/1676149.jpg)
