Wednesday, June 25, 2008

The PLANING BILL, 'debated' in the UK House of Commons just now, contains the FURTHER erosion of rights that are evident in the CROSSRAIL 'Bill'

1612 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday 25 June 2008
The KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law challenge against the Gordon Brown administration obstructing democratic representation of evidence against Crossrail is being founded on the same grounds as are being cited by opponents in the House of Commons today [Wednesday 25 June 2008] of the PLANNING BILL that has just been fronted in the House of Commons by Hazel Blears.


What is significant in the context of the ‘debate’ held in the typically empty Chamber in the House of Commons is that those who are arguing on constitutional law and democratic al grounds that the Planning Bill will undermine democratic accountability [David Curry] and that it will invalidate certain statutes as passed by the House of commons, may have contributed to the confidence that Gordon Brown feels in introducing yet another Big Business-suiting, antidemocratic, draconian, antidemocratic piece of legislation.


And where might he get that go-ahead?


Why in the mass backing of the draconian way that the Crossrail Bill Select committee in the Commons and the counterpart charade in the House of Lords were given by these so-called accountability-conscious, rights-conscious, constitutionality-conscious ‘'legislators'’.


They caved in to the Crossrail hole plot. And they now have the ridiculously gall to complain that the new Planning Bill is another encroachment to civil liberties, to peoples’ say....


This is why the unconstitutionality of the Crossrail Bill is being put through the court process by KHOODEELAAR! This is so that these very serious issues are examined in court, through the court processes.....

Issues, the evidence, the impact, the implications of the Crossrail hole package that should have been examined in Parliament but were not examined by either the ordinary MPs or via the Crossrail Bill Select committees, will now be examined in court....

[To be continued]

No comments: