By©Muhammad Haque
0325 Hrs GMT
London
Friday 16 May 2008
Mental slavery is the worst form of slavery, Gordon Brown.
And you must stop your own. And spare the rest of the world the contamination of your mental servitude.
Why is Gordon Brown repeating his mental servitude to the racist empire and the imperial relics?
When will this highly exposed man of prudence -clearly proven man of imprudence - learn that he will not last as anything by being a mental slave?
And is his propensity to mental servitude perhaps the certain clue as to why he gave in to the sub-racist bullying by his fellow egotist Ken Lyingstill Livingstone when Livingstone flaunted the City of London interests' lie that 'the world class financial city of London' was keeping the Scottish people practically alive?
Is Gordon Brown the worst mental slave in any office of state power in the western European hemisphere today?
If he is not one - a mental slave, that is - then perhaps his ‘roots’ should be examined, to determine whether he is a courier of a substantially similar malady that must have, in the 18th century of the Christian calendar, infected the population of what is ridiculously called ‘British’ by the massively confused Gordoin Brown!
For Gordon Brown is coming apart intellectually. It is almost like the Boris Johnson of the Ken Livingstone propaganda during the third term-seeking desperation of January 2008 to April 2008:- a figure of fun, a joker.
Only in Gordon Brown’s case, [and in the cases of quite a few of the lying propaganda assault by the careerist Livingstone] the image, the cartoon characterisation may be cruelly reversed! In the plural too.
To explain.
Whereas Ken Livingstone unfurled a banner calling Boris Johnson a joke and derided Johnson's’ bid to become the ‘elected mayor’ in the name of London as unworthy of the people of London, Johnson in fact did not do anything similarly offensive or overconfident.
Everyone that has been part of the corrupter Livingstone entourage as against Johnson, has been watching Johnson for the much expected [by the entourage] gaffes and errors.
Johnson has made none of those ones. In fact Johnson has begun to behave like a Tory in power would.
And that is one aspect that deserved serious attention. But it was the one that Livingstone and his lying, corrupted band left out of emphasis.
So far Johnson has failed to commit any of the jokes that Livingstone predicted, it may be that Johnson will stay the course and prove Livingstone to be the joker. Along with Gordon Brown who endorsed Livingstone beyond the call of reason. Or beyond the backing of evidence.
Not only that, Gordoin Brown may be exposed even more as being totally imprudent.
So much so that his pretence to be the 'personification' of financial and economic prudence may be his undoing. It has already begun. And that contradictory, intellectually incoherent, illogical, evidentially unfounded, insecure, defensive interview broadcast on the TODAY programme on Thursday 15 May 2008 may only be a pointer to the iceberg that may yet be found to have been the destination that the ‘political’ career of Gordon Brown was heading for..... All along...
[To be continued]
Thursday, May 15, 2008
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Brown must call Ca-Moron's bluff and roll out a really caring programme...
Brown must call Ca-Moron's bluff and roll out a really caring programme...
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Frank Field is a backer of Big Business; Frank Field is a key Benefit Fraudster...
By©Muhammad Haque
1312 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday 13 May 2008
Remember this: Frank Field is claiming all the credits for the pressure on Gordon Brown on behalf of the poor.
Then think again: does Frank Field really side with the poor.
If Gordon Brown and Alistair darling are guilty of attacking the poor then Frank Field too should be held responsible.
Ever since Field got fired as a so-called welfare reform minister [he blames Brown for the sacking] Field has tried to make a side career as an expert.
But what is the man’s expertise?
True that he is an expert at getting the media platforms.
But what does he actually know about the British welfare system?
I would say that Frank Field is a fraud.
in fact Frank Field is a benefit fraud.
Frank Field does not know about welfare and he most certainly is no friend of the poor.
It is about time that the fraudulent Frank Field were exposed.
The first thing that needs to be understood about welfare in Britain is this: what does it amount to ?
Does welfare exist ?
Yes, people are on benefits. There are benefits.
But what do these benefits mean in real terms?
And how do people get into this state?
What has Frank Field to say about this?
When did he say anything about the cause of poverty and the link between poverty and the state?
And what was his solution to poverty?
Does the state create poverty?
If it does then shouldn't we be addressing the state creation of poverty rather than the people who are pushed into poverty?
And what exactly is wealth?
Where does wealth come from?
Is there a secret tunnel through which wealth travels?
These questions ought to be asked and the answers to them sought from Frank Field.
But the media platforms that are given to him are not fronted - or set - by those who want to ask the questions far less to demand the answers.
In fact BOTH Brown and Field are on the side of the state dominating the level of peoples’ rights, if there are any left.
Because if they asked the questions, they would find that like the NHS, the principles underlying the setting up of the welfare side to the state, have never been respected by the state.
Or by Big Business that dies set the agenda of the behaviour of the state.
And with the passage of time and with the revival of the very greed and the very capitalistic corruption at the centre of the state, the institutions that did tend to make society civilised, have been undermined by the holders of power in the state.
And that is why Frank Field was a failure as a welfare reform minister. Because he is a servant of the status quo.
And the status quo is the same among all the three parties in the so-called democratic parliament.
The result is that when Brown disposed of the so-called 10p rate, they did not mount any opposition to it.
Only by accident did the 10p change become a topic of temporary political moment.
[To be continued]
1312 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday 13 May 2008
Remember this: Frank Field is claiming all the credits for the pressure on Gordon Brown on behalf of the poor.
Then think again: does Frank Field really side with the poor.
If Gordon Brown and Alistair darling are guilty of attacking the poor then Frank Field too should be held responsible.
Ever since Field got fired as a so-called welfare reform minister [he blames Brown for the sacking] Field has tried to make a side career as an expert.
But what is the man’s expertise?
True that he is an expert at getting the media platforms.
But what does he actually know about the British welfare system?
I would say that Frank Field is a fraud.
in fact Frank Field is a benefit fraud.
Frank Field does not know about welfare and he most certainly is no friend of the poor.
It is about time that the fraudulent Frank Field were exposed.
The first thing that needs to be understood about welfare in Britain is this: what does it amount to ?
Does welfare exist ?
Yes, people are on benefits. There are benefits.
But what do these benefits mean in real terms?
And how do people get into this state?
What has Frank Field to say about this?
When did he say anything about the cause of poverty and the link between poverty and the state?
And what was his solution to poverty?
Does the state create poverty?
If it does then shouldn't we be addressing the state creation of poverty rather than the people who are pushed into poverty?
And what exactly is wealth?
Where does wealth come from?
Is there a secret tunnel through which wealth travels?
These questions ought to be asked and the answers to them sought from Frank Field.
But the media platforms that are given to him are not fronted - or set - by those who want to ask the questions far less to demand the answers.
In fact BOTH Brown and Field are on the side of the state dominating the level of peoples’ rights, if there are any left.
Because if they asked the questions, they would find that like the NHS, the principles underlying the setting up of the welfare side to the state, have never been respected by the state.
Or by Big Business that dies set the agenda of the behaviour of the state.
And with the passage of time and with the revival of the very greed and the very capitalistic corruption at the centre of the state, the institutions that did tend to make society civilised, have been undermined by the holders of power in the state.
And that is why Frank Field was a failure as a welfare reform minister. Because he is a servant of the status quo.
And the status quo is the same among all the three parties in the so-called democratic parliament.
The result is that when Brown disposed of the so-called 10p rate, they did not mount any opposition to it.
Only by accident did the 10p change become a topic of temporary political moment.
[To be continued]
Frank Field is a backer of Big Business, a causer of state-controlled poverty and hardship. Frank Field is a key Benefit Fraudster...
By©Muhammad Haque
1312 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday 13 May 2008
Remember this: Frank Field is claiming all the credits for the pressure on Gordon Brown on behalf of the poor.
Then think again: does Frank Field really side with the poor.
If Gordon Brown and Alistair darling are guilty of attacking the poor then Frank Field too should be held responsible.
Ever since Field got fired as a so-called welfare reform minister [he blames Brown for the sacking] Field has tried to make a side career as an expert.
But what is the man’s expertise?
True that he is an expert at getting the media platforms.
But what does he actually know about the British welfare system?
I would say that Frank Field is a fraud.
in fact Frank Field is a benefit fraud.
Frank Field does not know about welfare and he most certainly is no friend of the poor.
It is about time that the fraudulent Frank Field were exposed.
The first thing that needs to be understood about welfare in Britain is this: what does it amount to ?
Does welfare exist ?
Yes, people are on benefits. There are benefits.
But what do these benefits mean in real terms?
And how do people get into this state?
What has Frank Field to say about this?
When did he say anything about the cause of poverty and the link between poverty and the state?
And what was his solution to poverty?
Does the state create poverty?
If it dies then shouldn't we be addressing the state creation of poverty rather than the people who are pushed into poverty?
And what exactly is wealth?
Where does wealth come from?
Is there a secret tunnel through which wealth travels?
These questions ought to be asked and the answers to them sought from Frank Field.
But the media platforms that are given to him are not fronted - or set - by those who want to ask the questions far less to demand the answers.
In fact BOTH Brown and Field are on the side of the state dominating the level of peoples’ rights, if there are any left.
Because if they asked the questions, they would find that like the NHS, the principles underlying the setting up of the welfare side to the state, have never been respected by the state.
Or by Big Business that dies set the agenda of the behaviour of the state.
And with the passage of time and with the revival of the very greed and the very capitalistic corruption at the centre of the state, the institutions that did tend to make society civilised, have been undermined by the holders of power in the state.
And that is why Frank Field was a failure as a welfare reform minister. Because he is a servant of the status quo.
And the status quo is the same among all the three parties in the so-called democratic parliament.
The result is that when Brown disposed of the so-called 10p rate, they did not mount any opposition to it.
Only by accident did the 10p change become a topic of temporary political moment.
[To be continued]
1312 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday 13 May 2008
Remember this: Frank Field is claiming all the credits for the pressure on Gordon Brown on behalf of the poor.
Then think again: does Frank Field really side with the poor.
If Gordon Brown and Alistair darling are guilty of attacking the poor then Frank Field too should be held responsible.
Ever since Field got fired as a so-called welfare reform minister [he blames Brown for the sacking] Field has tried to make a side career as an expert.
But what is the man’s expertise?
True that he is an expert at getting the media platforms.
But what does he actually know about the British welfare system?
I would say that Frank Field is a fraud.
in fact Frank Field is a benefit fraud.
Frank Field does not know about welfare and he most certainly is no friend of the poor.
It is about time that the fraudulent Frank Field were exposed.
The first thing that needs to be understood about welfare in Britain is this: what does it amount to ?
Does welfare exist ?
Yes, people are on benefits. There are benefits.
But what do these benefits mean in real terms?
And how do people get into this state?
What has Frank Field to say about this?
When did he say anything about the cause of poverty and the link between poverty and the state?
And what was his solution to poverty?
Does the state create poverty?
If it dies then shouldn't we be addressing the state creation of poverty rather than the people who are pushed into poverty?
And what exactly is wealth?
Where does wealth come from?
Is there a secret tunnel through which wealth travels?
These questions ought to be asked and the answers to them sought from Frank Field.
But the media platforms that are given to him are not fronted - or set - by those who want to ask the questions far less to demand the answers.
In fact BOTH Brown and Field are on the side of the state dominating the level of peoples’ rights, if there are any left.
Because if they asked the questions, they would find that like the NHS, the principles underlying the setting up of the welfare side to the state, have never been respected by the state.
Or by Big Business that dies set the agenda of the behaviour of the state.
And with the passage of time and with the revival of the very greed and the very capitalistic corruption at the centre of the state, the institutions that did tend to make society civilised, have been undermined by the holders of power in the state.
And that is why Frank Field was a failure as a welfare reform minister. Because he is a servant of the status quo.
And the status quo is the same among all the three parties in the so-called democratic parliament.
The result is that when Brown disposed of the so-called 10p rate, they did not mount any opposition to it.
Only by accident did the 10p change become a topic of temporary political moment.
[To be continued]
Why Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole-inviter Council has had no 'opposition leadership' on the Council -
By©Muhammad Haque
1055 Hrs GMT
London Tuesday
13 May 2008
[Continuing from the previous item about Tower Hamlets Council published here this morning]
Just how solid is that ‘belief’? Or, rather. how sound is that ground for that ‘belief’ by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council that there is no ‘alternative’ to the current clique, that may take over the Council at the next coun cil election?
The ‘candidates’ have not spoken yet.
But by looking at the behaviour of the ‘candidates’ it is reasonable to say that they feel that they are not vincible. That they will, remain in the ‘majority’ group and they will ‘reign’ in the Tower Hamlets Borough!
And why should they feel so confident?
Part of the reason is to be found in what janet did!
Janet Ludlow!
Ludlow was allegedly the ‘leader of the group that was known as the ‘official opposition’ on Tower Hamlets Council upto the May 2006 council election.
She had anything upto 16 councillors including herself, that belonged, on paper, to the same group. They were treated as the official opposition on Tower Hamlets Coun cil...
But did they oppose?
And if they did, did the voters notice their opposition?
This could not be tested more comprehensively than on the matter of the Janet Ludlow role on Crossrail hole plot....
Khoodeelaar! campaign has published quite a significant number of pieces about Janet Ludlow’s role.
In fact, not even the ‘local’ ‘East London Idiotiser’ has written so much about Janet Ludlow.
We examine her role in context, next
[To be continued]
1055 Hrs GMT
London Tuesday
13 May 2008
[Continuing from the previous item about Tower Hamlets Council published here this morning]
Just how solid is that ‘belief’? Or, rather. how sound is that ground for that ‘belief’ by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council that there is no ‘alternative’ to the current clique, that may take over the Council at the next coun cil election?
The ‘candidates’ have not spoken yet.
But by looking at the behaviour of the ‘candidates’ it is reasonable to say that they feel that they are not vincible. That they will, remain in the ‘majority’ group and they will ‘reign’ in the Tower Hamlets Borough!
And why should they feel so confident?
Part of the reason is to be found in what janet did!
Janet Ludlow!
Ludlow was allegedly the ‘leader of the group that was known as the ‘official opposition’ on Tower Hamlets Council upto the May 2006 council election.
She had anything upto 16 councillors including herself, that belonged, on paper, to the same group. They were treated as the official opposition on Tower Hamlets Coun cil...
But did they oppose?
And if they did, did the voters notice their opposition?
This could not be tested more comprehensively than on the matter of the Janet Ludlow role on Crossrail hole plot....
Khoodeelaar! campaign has published quite a significant number of pieces about Janet Ludlow’s role.
In fact, not even the ‘local’ ‘East London Idiotiser’ has written so much about Janet Ludlow.
We examine her role in context, next
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! updating the democratic warning to Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole-inviter Council: you are heading for that hole....!
By©Muhammad Haque
1030 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 13 May 2008
One of the key reasons for the creation in january 2004 of the Khoodeelaar! campaign in defence of the Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area and against the “Crossrail hole plot-imposing Big Business agenda has been the prevalence of poverty-creation in the policies of the Blairing administration....
In the course of the four years and four months of the Khoodeelaar! campaign, we have done the research and we have done the information gathering...
And we have done the constitution-examining...
In doing all these, we have been actively involved with the people directly affected by the plans and we have kept a daily watch on the behaviour of the ‘elected’ ‘local’ councillors...
Councillors who DEPEND on the votes of these people for their being councillors...
We have found that one after another, the councillors have lied.....
Why have they lied?
They have lied because they have been told to lie. Told by who?
Told to lie by the corrupt clique that controls the real agenda of the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council...
And who are these councillors?
These are councillors that are in the ‘controlling’ group and they are quite blasé because they ‘believe’ that there is no party or group that is principled, competent, efficient and or honest enough to replace them at the next council election.
[To be continued]
1030 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 13 May 2008
One of the key reasons for the creation in january 2004 of the Khoodeelaar! campaign in defence of the Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area and against the “Crossrail hole plot-imposing Big Business agenda has been the prevalence of poverty-creation in the policies of the Blairing administration....
In the course of the four years and four months of the Khoodeelaar! campaign, we have done the research and we have done the information gathering...
And we have done the constitution-examining...
In doing all these, we have been actively involved with the people directly affected by the plans and we have kept a daily watch on the behaviour of the ‘elected’ ‘local’ councillors...
Councillors who DEPEND on the votes of these people for their being councillors...
We have found that one after another, the councillors have lied.....
Why have they lied?
They have lied because they have been told to lie. Told by who?
Told to lie by the corrupt clique that controls the real agenda of the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council...
And who are these councillors?
These are councillors that are in the ‘controlling’ group and they are quite blasé because they ‘believe’ that there is no party or group that is principled, competent, efficient and or honest enough to replace them at the next council election.
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! constitutional law action against the Big Business-colluding, Crossrail hole-peddler bureaucracy in the UK House of Lords
0840 Hrs GMT 0940 Hrs UK Time London Tuesday 13 May 2008:
Khoodeelaar! constitutional law action against the "Crossrail Bill" [now in the UK legislative 'House of Lords' ]
ACTION ARCHIVE and update about the clear, consistent, constitutional law advice that we have been giving to the 'local' East London borough of Tower Hamlets COUNCIl on how it, 'Tower Hamlets Council' could save 'face' and stop colluding with the Crossrail hole plotters..... This week [starting on Monday 12 May 2008] Khoodeelaar! is serving the final and the updated 'letters before claim' procedures and demands on the 'Tower Hamlets Council' and on the bureaucracies at Transport for London, at the Cross London Rail Links [= CLRL] company and at the Department for Transport .... These letters before claim are the last stages before we start the applications to the London High court......
And then take the matter through all the stages of the 'UK domestic court system' before the matter being referred to the European courts.....
Khoodeelaar! constitutional law action against the "Crossrail Bill" [now in the UK legislative 'House of Lords' ]
ACTION ARCHIVE and update about the clear, consistent, constitutional law advice that we have been giving to the 'local' East London borough of Tower Hamlets COUNCIl on how it, 'Tower Hamlets Council' could save 'face' and stop colluding with the Crossrail hole plotters..... This week [starting on Monday 12 May 2008] Khoodeelaar! is serving the final and the updated 'letters before claim' procedures and demands on the 'Tower Hamlets Council' and on the bureaucracies at Transport for London, at the Cross London Rail Links [= CLRL] company and at the Department for Transport .... These letters before claim are the last stages before we start the applications to the London High court......
And then take the matter through all the stages of the 'UK domestic court system' before the matter being referred to the European courts.....
Monday, May 12, 2008
Rupert Murdoch media and the BBC are in league to sink Gordon Brown... They will not like the consequences... They must stop the lying ....
By©Muhammad Haque
0630 GMT
London
Tuesday 13 May 2008
Why?
Because Rupert Murdoch has decided to use the Times newspapers and the SUN to undermine the remaining 'popularity' of Gordoin Brown. As have those whose et the agenda within the BBC. They have no NEED to do commercials for Cherie Blair's obscene peddling of her alleged account.
Yet they have been doing so round the clock for the best part of the past week.
And Michael Crick on NEWSNIGHT [Monday 12 May 2008] showed that he has really less scruples than the myths of his investigative self promotion had suggested over the previous career-building years. Crick too is an opportunist. And a fabricator.
There is no reasonable, objectively verifiable, universally applicable and maintained comparison between the ‘CONDUCT’ of Tony Blair in office and the conduct of Gordon Brown in office.
In fact Brown has protected Blair for far longer and on far too many things than the other way around. And another thing: Brown has not rushed the people into the occupation of two countries. Not yet. His backing for Blair’s policy is more to to with the ‘British vahloos’ that Brown has been snared and pushed into adopting..... By a sub-racial lobby that has ben at work for a long time at ‘Westminster’ ... This has been Brown’s mistake. Not his crime. And this has been due to Brown’s not getting the right advice.....Can’t say the same about Blair. On the evidence of the conduct.
[To be continued]
0630 GMT
London
Tuesday 13 May 2008
Why?
Because Rupert Murdoch has decided to use the Times newspapers and the SUN to undermine the remaining 'popularity' of Gordoin Brown. As have those whose et the agenda within the BBC. They have no NEED to do commercials for Cherie Blair's obscene peddling of her alleged account.
Yet they have been doing so round the clock for the best part of the past week.
And Michael Crick on NEWSNIGHT [Monday 12 May 2008] showed that he has really less scruples than the myths of his investigative self promotion had suggested over the previous career-building years. Crick too is an opportunist. And a fabricator.
There is no reasonable, objectively verifiable, universally applicable and maintained comparison between the ‘CONDUCT’ of Tony Blair in office and the conduct of Gordon Brown in office.
In fact Brown has protected Blair for far longer and on far too many things than the other way around. And another thing: Brown has not rushed the people into the occupation of two countries. Not yet. His backing for Blair’s policy is more to to with the ‘British vahloos’ that Brown has been snared and pushed into adopting..... By a sub-racial lobby that has ben at work for a long time at ‘Westminster’ ... This has been Brown’s mistake. Not his crime. And this has been due to Brown’s not getting the right advice.....Can’t say the same about Blair. On the evidence of the conduct.
[To be continued]
All the Blairs' Lies! They are confessing like an epidemic! How long before they confess to CRASSrail hole plotting lies ?
All the Blairs' Lies! They are confessing like an epidemic! How long before they confess to CRASSrail hole plotting lies ?
The Muhammad Haque commentary on Cherie ‘Blair’ , Michael Levy, John Prescott and Frank Field - due here, soon
The Muhammad Haque commentary on Cherie ‘Blair’ , Michael Levy, John Prescott and Frank Field - due here, soon
Sunday, May 11, 2008
Gordon Brown's 'survival' in the polls and in office lies only in one way - by his telling the truth and doing the truth.....
Khoodeelaar! No to 'Big Business Crossrail hole plot' CAMPAIGN comment on Gordon Brown's unravelling image of imprudence! By©Muhammd Haque 1520 Hrs GMT London Sunday 11 May 2008:
You - Gordon Brown - must learn VERY fast. You Gordon Brown, must ditch the pack of lies that you uttered when you were ensnared by Big Business-tout Ken Livingstone to go and tell the Capitalist financial centre [misnamed as ‘City of London’ and the ‘Corporation of London’ 'Mansion House' audience [late 2007] that you would fund the CRASSrail scam from the public purse... You know that the entire Crossrail propaganda by Livingstone in which you have reluctantly taken part, has been a lie. Retract that lie by recognising publicly that you accept the need for BOTH Houses of UK Parliament to be allowed to scrutinise Bills. You start by letting the House fo Lords do so on the ‘Crossrail hole Bill. You set in motion the process that leads to the scrutiny being open. And by the scrutiny being unfettered by Big Business and other external and non-parliamentary lobbys operating through and within the UK civil service. Distance yourself from Douglas Alexander’s agency as typified by the one operated via his ‘"former"’ parliamentary aide, for the Big Business Bechtel corporation... and that way, you ditch one of the painful Alexanders. Then you up the ‘Union’ [project by playing fair, thus defusing the ‘potent’ trump card that wee Wendy might still claim to have......You may even stage a cordial session with Alex Salmond, thus finishing off Wendy altogether....And if that didn't work, you could always play the morality card and really go to town on sleaze and greed by public figures. Those making careers in the name of the public and being paid for and ‘supported’ in positions in the name of the publicv.....Include a comprehensive bullet point programme against sleaze by MPs in the Queen’s Speech that you are at work on..... [To be continued]
You - Gordon Brown - must learn VERY fast. You Gordon Brown, must ditch the pack of lies that you uttered when you were ensnared by Big Business-tout Ken Livingstone to go and tell the Capitalist financial centre [misnamed as ‘City of London’ and the ‘Corporation of London’ 'Mansion House' audience [late 2007] that you would fund the CRASSrail scam from the public purse... You know that the entire Crossrail propaganda by Livingstone in which you have reluctantly taken part, has been a lie. Retract that lie by recognising publicly that you accept the need for BOTH Houses of UK Parliament to be allowed to scrutinise Bills. You start by letting the House fo Lords do so on the ‘Crossrail hole Bill. You set in motion the process that leads to the scrutiny being open. And by the scrutiny being unfettered by Big Business and other external and non-parliamentary lobbys operating through and within the UK civil service. Distance yourself from Douglas Alexander’s agency as typified by the one operated via his ‘"former"’ parliamentary aide, for the Big Business Bechtel corporation... and that way, you ditch one of the painful Alexanders. Then you up the ‘Union’ [project by playing fair, thus defusing the ‘potent’ trump card that wee Wendy might still claim to have......You may even stage a cordial session with Alex Salmond, thus finishing off Wendy altogether....And if that didn't work, you could always play the morality card and really go to town on sleaze and greed by public figures. Those making careers in the name of the public and being paid for and ‘supported’ in positions in the name of the publicv.....Include a comprehensive bullet point programme against sleaze by MPs in the Queen’s Speech that you are at work on..... [To be continued]
Saturday, May 10, 2008
The only values that will save Brown and society are the values of universal justice and fairness...
By©Muhammad Haque
0440 Hrs GMT
London Sunday 11 May 2008
First [that is only yesterday sat 10 may 2008] it was Cherie 'Booth' Blair being flaunted by Rupert Murdoch to sharpen the knife in .Gordon Brown's direction And this morning [Sunday 11 May 2008], it is John Prescott, who is being reported as having claimed to have advised Blair in the past to sack Gordon Brown when Brown was still the UK finance minister in Blair's administration.
Then there has been Peter Mandelson. Giving advice to Gordon Brown
And of all people, Alistair Campbell. Advising .Gordon Brown
These are signs if any new were needed that the .Gordon Brown administration is in comprehensive trouble.
If these events in fact lead to Brown’s administration dying, then the post mortem will not necessarily blame Brown. What swill be blamed, in a genuine analysis, is the fact that Blair had succeeded in destroying the very things on which he had made so many boastful claims. His boasts were to the opposite effect. He boasted of supporting the democratic structures and institutions that he was in fact smashing up...
The institutions of honesty, transparency in public life. Or the place of honesty and transparency; in public life.
.Gordon Brown has a serious shortage of sound honest opinion. Everyone within any reasonable range of 'power' [however transient, however shallow] is making their pitch. In secret. And in the case of Charles Clarke , he is getting as bitter because of losing power as he was when Blair first sacked him in effect.
The void of democratic audit, of critical mass that could save Brown was created by Blair. And Brown aided Blair in doing that.
Where should Brown turn now?
He should start even at this late stage, to tell the truth and the whole truth.
Her should discard fabrication. And mobilise the masses of people he helped to push into poverty and deprivation to unite behind a banner that will save his career and deliver the limited but only sure way of support in the next 10 years and beyond.
If he can’t see this or if he will not do this then Brown will deserve to go....
[To be continued]
0440 Hrs GMT
London Sunday 11 May 2008
First [that is only yesterday sat 10 may 2008] it was Cherie 'Booth' Blair being flaunted by Rupert Murdoch to sharpen the knife in .Gordon Brown's direction And this morning [Sunday 11 May 2008], it is John Prescott, who is being reported as having claimed to have advised Blair in the past to sack Gordon Brown when Brown was still the UK finance minister in Blair's administration.
Then there has been Peter Mandelson. Giving advice to Gordon Brown
And of all people, Alistair Campbell. Advising .Gordon Brown
These are signs if any new were needed that the .Gordon Brown administration is in comprehensive trouble.
If these events in fact lead to Brown’s administration dying, then the post mortem will not necessarily blame Brown. What swill be blamed, in a genuine analysis, is the fact that Blair had succeeded in destroying the very things on which he had made so many boastful claims. His boasts were to the opposite effect. He boasted of supporting the democratic structures and institutions that he was in fact smashing up...
The institutions of honesty, transparency in public life. Or the place of honesty and transparency; in public life.
.Gordon Brown has a serious shortage of sound honest opinion. Everyone within any reasonable range of 'power' [however transient, however shallow] is making their pitch. In secret. And in the case of Charles Clarke , he is getting as bitter because of losing power as he was when Blair first sacked him in effect.
The void of democratic audit, of critical mass that could save Brown was created by Blair. And Brown aided Blair in doing that.
Where should Brown turn now?
He should start even at this late stage, to tell the truth and the whole truth.
Her should discard fabrication. And mobilise the masses of people he helped to push into poverty and deprivation to unite behind a banner that will save his career and deliver the limited but only sure way of support in the next 10 years and beyond.
If he can’t see this or if he will not do this then Brown will deserve to go....
[To be continued]
The only values that will save Brown and society are the values justice and fairness.
Gordon Brown's travails - real and media-hyped- confirm one thing: the only hope the ordinary people have against the power-gangs, is in awareness...
By©Muhammad Haque
0440 Hrs GMT
London Sunday 11 May 2008
First [that is only yesterday sat 10 may 2008] it was Cherie 'Booth' Blair being flaunted by Rupert Murdoch to sharpen the knife in .Gordon Brown's direction And this morning [Sunday 11 May 2008], it is John Prescott, who is being reported as having claimed to have advised Blair in the past to sack Gordon Brown when Brown was still the UK finance minister in Blair's administration.
Then there has been Peter Mandelson. Giving advice to Gordon Brown
And of all people, Alistair Campbell. Advising .Gordon Brown
These are signs if any new were needed that the .Gordon Brown administration is in comprehensive trouble.
If these events in fact lead to Brown’s administration dying, then the post mortem will not necessarily blame Brown. What swill be blamed, in a genuine analysis, is the fact that Blair had succeeded in destroying the very things on which he had made so many boastful claims. His boasts were to the opposite effect. He boasted of supporting the democratic structures and institutions that he was in fact smashing up...
The institutions of honesty, transparency in public life. Or the place of honesty and transparency; in public life.
.Gordon Brown has a serious shortage of sound honest opinion. Everyone within any reasonable range of 'power' [however transient, however shallow] is making their pitch. In secret. And in the case of Charles Clarke , he is getting as bitter because of losing power as he was when Blair first sacked him in effect.
The void of democratic audit, of critical mass that could save Brown was created by Blair. And Brown aided Blair in doing that.
Where should Brown turn now?
He should start even at this late stage, to tell the truth and the whole truth.
Her should discard fabrication. And mobilise the masses of people he helped to push into poverty and deprivation to unite behind a banner that will save his career and deliver the limited but only sure way of support in the next 10 years and beyond.
If he can’t see this or if he will not do this then Brown will deserve to go....
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
0440 Hrs GMT
London Sunday 11 May 2008
First [that is only yesterday sat 10 may 2008] it was Cherie 'Booth' Blair being flaunted by Rupert Murdoch to sharpen the knife in .Gordon Brown's direction And this morning [Sunday 11 May 2008], it is John Prescott, who is being reported as having claimed to have advised Blair in the past to sack Gordon Brown when Brown was still the UK finance minister in Blair's administration.
Then there has been Peter Mandelson. Giving advice to Gordon Brown
And of all people, Alistair Campbell. Advising .Gordon Brown
These are signs if any new were needed that the .Gordon Brown administration is in comprehensive trouble.
If these events in fact lead to Brown’s administration dying, then the post mortem will not necessarily blame Brown. What swill be blamed, in a genuine analysis, is the fact that Blair had succeeded in destroying the very things on which he had made so many boastful claims. His boasts were to the opposite effect. He boasted of supporting the democratic structures and institutions that he was in fact smashing up...
The institutions of honesty, transparency in public life. Or the place of honesty and transparency; in public life.
.Gordon Brown has a serious shortage of sound honest opinion. Everyone within any reasonable range of 'power' [however transient, however shallow] is making their pitch. In secret. And in the case of Charles Clarke , he is getting as bitter because of losing power as he was when Blair first sacked him in effect.
The void of democratic audit, of critical mass that could save Brown was created by Blair. And Brown aided Blair in doing that.
Where should Brown turn now?
He should start even at this late stage, to tell the truth and the whole truth.
Her should discard fabrication. And mobilise the masses of people he helped to push into poverty and deprivation to unite behind a banner that will save his career and deliver the limited but only sure way of support in the next 10 years and beyond.
If he can’t see this or if he will not do this then Brown will deserve to go....
[To be continued]
Lost Lists of local leaderships in the East End of London! Whither the people in the East End borough of Tower Hopeless Council?
A report here in the next hours, after the Weavers Ward by-election
Thursday, May 8, 2008
Gordon Brown's poverty - and his racist action in CREATING poverty - updated 8 May 2008
Gordon Brown’s diminishing legitimacy is linked not with his ‘enemies’, but with his own lack of honesty.
If he has honesty than he is keeping it hidden.
Very hidden
Especially about poverty.
Poverty that has been GROWING all the time.
To such an extent that the world’s impoverished peoples are again facing hunger, starvation and famine on a scale that has not been discussed in any significant way in public and in the mainstream media of the poverty-creating western ‘states’ for quite a while. .......
The length of time that ..Gordon Brown has been active to promote his career as an adult.
Say for the past 30 years or so...
Gordon Brown has been allowed to pretend that his is cleverer than he actually is
. That pretence is coming off and being exposed faster than he had ever imagined it would do...
Over the past 3 years, Brown has made overly exaggerated claims about tackling poverty. Nowhere more so than in Africa.
Yet in Africa, while on a self-publicising tour, he also boasted in the most offensive way and bragged that he was NOT going to apologise for the racist empire perpetration by his racist predecessors in British power....
Brown forgot then and he is still forgetting now the simple universal truth. And he is evidently ignorant about the inevitability of truth in action. There is a way in which truth asserts itself. At the most unexpected fo times for the violators of the truth....
For Brown the aspect of the truth that has already hit him is this: - that you cannot brag about a wrong and then expect to be taken at all seriously when you claim to be ‘attacking that very wrong’. Because Brown is and has been a racist, he fails to understand that people in Africa - and people of African origin and descent - just like the people from Asia and people fo Asian descent - and the people from other continents and parts fo the world where the racists imposed their racist empire and created the environments for poverty, hunger, famine, starvation, denial did not EVER ask to be violated, NEVER asked to be invaded, never asked to be dehumanised, violated and starved.....And they most certainly did not deserve to be then lectured by the wrongdoer about the rightness[!!!] of the wrong that has lasted now for several centuries.... ..
Brown’s appearance at the UNO recently did little to alter the truth - that he is and has been with the racists....
That is why his sermonising about Mugabe has had no effect at all
He is forever associated with the image he himself created - that of an ignorant racist bragging about ‘British 'vahloos'’ in Africa while claiming to be opposing the very consequences of those racist 'vahloos'....[To be continued].....
If he has honesty than he is keeping it hidden.
Very hidden
Especially about poverty.
Poverty that has been GROWING all the time.
To such an extent that the world’s impoverished peoples are again facing hunger, starvation and famine on a scale that has not been discussed in any significant way in public and in the mainstream media of the poverty-creating western ‘states’ for quite a while. .......
The length of time that ..Gordon Brown has been active to promote his career as an adult.
Say for the past 30 years or so...
Gordon Brown has been allowed to pretend that his is cleverer than he actually is
. That pretence is coming off and being exposed faster than he had ever imagined it would do...
Over the past 3 years, Brown has made overly exaggerated claims about tackling poverty. Nowhere more so than in Africa.
Yet in Africa, while on a self-publicising tour, he also boasted in the most offensive way and bragged that he was NOT going to apologise for the racist empire perpetration by his racist predecessors in British power....
Brown forgot then and he is still forgetting now the simple universal truth. And he is evidently ignorant about the inevitability of truth in action. There is a way in which truth asserts itself. At the most unexpected fo times for the violators of the truth....
For Brown the aspect of the truth that has already hit him is this: - that you cannot brag about a wrong and then expect to be taken at all seriously when you claim to be ‘attacking that very wrong’. Because Brown is and has been a racist, he fails to understand that people in Africa - and people of African origin and descent - just like the people from Asia and people fo Asian descent - and the people from other continents and parts fo the world where the racists imposed their racist empire and created the environments for poverty, hunger, famine, starvation, denial did not EVER ask to be violated, NEVER asked to be invaded, never asked to be dehumanised, violated and starved.....And they most certainly did not deserve to be then lectured by the wrongdoer about the rightness[!!!] of the wrong that has lasted now for several centuries.... ..
Brown’s appearance at the UNO recently did little to alter the truth - that he is and has been with the racists....
That is why his sermonising about Mugabe has had no effect at all
He is forever associated with the image he himself created - that of an ignorant racist bragging about ‘British 'vahloos'’ in Africa while claiming to be opposing the very consequences of those racist 'vahloos'....[To be continued].....
Wednesday, May 7, 2008
Who is taking 'Boris' Johnson off course on transport needs of all ordinary London people? What lobby is pushing 'Boris' into Crassrail hole?
By©Muhammad Haque
2010 Hrs GMT
2110 Hrs UK
London
Wednesday 7 May 2008
Is 'Boris' being derailed, taken off course and being pressed into pro-Big Business lying for the grubby , neo-con-linked Bechtel-propelled London ‘Crossrail’ scam 'already'?
In other words, and you have read and heard of it here from KHOODEELAAR! first, is ‘Boris’ Johnson being pushed [or even, in style terms, 'nudged'] into the Crossrail hole whence he will not recover, careerwise when it comes to reckoning?
Read this very carefully, whoever or whatever is ‘advising’ and ‘thinking up’ the stunts for ‘Boris’ Johnson at this early days, in fact this second day of ‘Boris Johnson’ in ‘office’ as ‘the mayor in the name of London’
What I mean by this question is- why isn’t Boris scrapping the outdated, wasteful, deeply flawed ‘Crossrail ‘'project', as far as the ‘powers’ of the ‘mayor in the name of London’ allow the occupant in the post [of ‘mayor in the name of London’] under existing legislation and laws to behave ?
Why not address ‘head on’ the issue of transport needs of London ?
Why not say that even the Rod Eddington report into railways -as commissioned by Gordon Brown - found AGAINST the London Crossrail?
Why not take the view that the vast majority of people, ordinary people in London, hold from daily biter and unadulterated experience, that the existing transport infrastructure and the existing transport accessibility must be given priority - by a long measure as compared to adventures, stunts ‘projects’?
[To be continued]
2010 Hrs GMT
2110 Hrs UK
London
Wednesday 7 May 2008
Is 'Boris' being derailed, taken off course and being pressed into pro-Big Business lying for the grubby , neo-con-linked Bechtel-propelled London ‘Crossrail’ scam 'already'?
In other words, and you have read and heard of it here from KHOODEELAAR! first, is ‘Boris’ Johnson being pushed [or even, in style terms, 'nudged'] into the Crossrail hole whence he will not recover, careerwise when it comes to reckoning?
Read this very carefully, whoever or whatever is ‘advising’ and ‘thinking up’ the stunts for ‘Boris’ Johnson at this early days, in fact this second day of ‘Boris Johnson’ in ‘office’ as ‘the mayor in the name of London’
What I mean by this question is- why isn’t Boris scrapping the outdated, wasteful, deeply flawed ‘Crossrail ‘'project', as far as the ‘powers’ of the ‘mayor in the name of London’ allow the occupant in the post [of ‘mayor in the name of London’] under existing legislation and laws to behave ?
Why not address ‘head on’ the issue of transport needs of London ?
Why not say that even the Rod Eddington report into railways -as commissioned by Gordon Brown - found AGAINST the London Crossrail?
Why not take the view that the vast majority of people, ordinary people in London, hold from daily biter and unadulterated experience, that the existing transport infrastructure and the existing transport accessibility must be given priority - by a long measure as compared to adventures, stunts ‘projects’?
[To be continued]
Monday, May 5, 2008
If you are an original thinker on the landscape, Boris Johnson, then scrap the 'mayoral backing' for CRASSrail NOW -1
By©Muhammad Haque
1324 Hrs GMT
London ‘Bank Holiday Monday’
5 May 2008
Boris Johnson was again derided by Rory Bremner, in the broadcast edition of Bremner’s commercial promotion packaged on Channel 4 last night.
Boris Johnson was said to be an idiot and an d someone who speaks incoherently.
In contrast to that, I logged on to Boris Johnson’s web site, for the first time ever, and found an assertion that said that Boris was one of the original thinkers on the contemporary political landscape...
Giving Boris the benefit of the doubt, I have got to put it to Boris Johnson like this: Have you done any original thinking on Crossrail? If you have, you cannot then go on ‘backing’ it. It is crass. it is flawed. it is wasteful. It is obsolete and must be scrapped.
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1
324 Hrs GMT
London ‘Bank Holiday Monday’
5 May 2008
Boris Johnson was again derided by Rory Bremner, in the broadcast edition of Bremner’s commercial promotion packaged on Channel 4 last night.
Boris Johnson was said to be an idiot and an d someone who speaks incoherently.
In contrast to that, I logged on to Boris Johnson’s web site, for the first time ever, and found an assertion that said that Boris was one of the original thinkers on the contemporary political landscape...
Giving Boris the benefit of the doubt, I have got to put it to Boris Johnson like this: Have you done any original thinking on Crossrail? If you have, you cannot then go on ‘backing’ it. It is crass. it is flawed. it is wasteful. It is obsolete and m
1324 Hrs GMT
London ‘Bank Holiday Monday’
5 May 2008
Boris Johnson was again derided by Rory Bremner, in the broadcast edition of Bremner’s commercial promotion packaged on Channel 4 last night.
Boris Johnson was said to be an idiot and an d someone who speaks incoherently.
In contrast to that, I logged on to Boris Johnson’s web site, for the first time ever, and found an assertion that said that Boris was one of the original thinkers on the contemporary political landscape...
Giving Boris the benefit of the doubt, I have got to put it to Boris Johnson like this: Have you done any original thinking on Crossrail? If you have, you cannot then go on ‘backing’ it. It is crass. it is flawed. it is wasteful. It is obsolete and must be scrapped.
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1
324 Hrs GMT
London ‘Bank Holiday Monday’
5 May 2008
Boris Johnson was again derided by Rory Bremner, in the broadcast edition of Bremner’s commercial promotion packaged on Channel 4 last night.
Boris Johnson was said to be an idiot and an d someone who speaks incoherently.
In contrast to that, I logged on to Boris Johnson’s web site, for the first time ever, and found an assertion that said that Boris was one of the original thinkers on the contemporary political landscape...
Giving Boris the benefit of the doubt, I have got to put it to Boris Johnson like this: Have you done any original thinking on Crossrail? If you have, you cannot then go on ‘backing’ it. It is crass. it is flawed. it is wasteful. It is obsolete and m
Thursday, May 1, 2008
BBC imposes Ken Livingstone on Bethnal Green as MP and promotes Livingstone's ally Galloway over London Assembly!
Taken from BBC online [http://www.bbc.co.uk] at 0813 Hrs GMT Thusrday 1 May 2008
[The actual BBC URL is
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7376084.stm
]
BBC imposes Ken Livingstone on Bethnal Green as MP and promotes Livingstone's ally Galloway over London Assembly!
This is what the BBC is sating in its piece this morning Thursday 1 May 2008:
AADHIKARonline quoting BBConline at 1818 Hrs GMT 1 May 2008
Mr Livingstone intends to carry on as MP for Bethnal Green and Bow if he is elected to the assembly: "I would be doing two jobs for one salary, so the London taxpayer will gain from electing me."
"It's an important platform and I intend to do my best with it to fight for the interests of the people we represent, the working people, the poorest people, the minority communities who need a big voice in London."
The party is also fielding candidates in by-elections for Tower Hamlets council, and in councils in Manchester, Wigan, Birmingham, Bradford and Walsall.
AADHIKARonline unquoting BBConline at 1818 Hrs GMT 1 May 2008
"
World
UK
England
Northern Ireland
Scotland
Wales
Business
Politics
Health
Education
Science/Nature
Technology
Entertainment
Also in the news
-----------------
Video and Audio
-----------------
Have Your Say
Magazine
In Pictures
Country Profiles
Special Reports
Related BBC sites
Sport
Weather
Radio 1 Newsbeat
CBBC News
On This Day
Editors' Blog
Site Version
UK Version
International Version
About the versions
Page last updated at 16:16 GMT, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 17:16 UK
E-mail this to a friend Printable version
Respect confident of assembly win
Mr Galloway has been shouting himself hoarse from the top of his bus
George Galloway is confident that by Friday he will hold two posts - MP and London Assembly member.
The Bethnal Green and Bow MP is top of Respect's list for the London-wide list, which is elected by a form of proportional representation.
He is losing his voice after talking "seven hours a day" from the top of his open-top bus which has been through all corners of London "at least twice".
He says it is important Respect wins a seat, if Boris Johnson is to be mayor.
The party is fielding 12 candidates and targeting one constituency seat, City and East, and says the response has been "very good".
Mr Galloway said he was looking forward to a result that will "surprise" the media.
'Important platform'
"The best result we can contemplate at the moment is winning the City and East constituency which is our heartland, and my election as top of the list," he said.
But he admits City and East could be difficult to win as it a geographically large seat with a varied electorate - taking in areas like the City of London and Barking and Dagenham - where the BNP hold 12 council seats.
Mr Livingstone intends to carry on as MP for Bethnal Green and Bow if he is elected to the assembly: "I would be doing two jobs for one salary, so the London taxpayer will gain from electing me."
"It's an important platform and I intend to do my best with it to fight for the interests of the people we represent, the working people, the poorest people, the minority communities who need a big voice in London."
The party is also fielding candidates in by-elections for Tower Hamlets council, and in councils in Manchester, Wigan, Birmingham, Bradford and Walsall.
"
[The actual BBC URL is
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7376084.stm
]
BBC imposes Ken Livingstone on Bethnal Green as MP and promotes Livingstone's ally Galloway over London Assembly!
This is what the BBC is sating in its piece this morning Thursday 1 May 2008:
AADHIKARonline quoting BBConline at 1818 Hrs GMT 1 May 2008
Mr Livingstone intends to carry on as MP for Bethnal Green and Bow if he is elected to the assembly: "I would be doing two jobs for one salary, so the London taxpayer will gain from electing me."
"It's an important platform and I intend to do my best with it to fight for the interests of the people we represent, the working people, the poorest people, the minority communities who need a big voice in London."
The party is also fielding candidates in by-elections for Tower Hamlets council, and in councils in Manchester, Wigan, Birmingham, Bradford and Walsall.
AADHIKARonline unquoting BBConline at 1818 Hrs GMT 1 May 2008
"
World
UK
England
Northern Ireland
Scotland
Wales
Business
Politics
Health
Education
Science/Nature
Technology
Entertainment
Also in the news
-----------------
Video and Audio
-----------------
Have Your Say
Magazine
In Pictures
Country Profiles
Special Reports
Related BBC sites
Sport
Weather
Radio 1 Newsbeat
CBBC News
On This Day
Editors' Blog
Site Version
UK Version
International Version
About the versions
Page last updated at 16:16 GMT, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 17:16 UK
E-mail this to a friend Printable version
Respect confident of assembly win
Mr Galloway has been shouting himself hoarse from the top of his bus
George Galloway is confident that by Friday he will hold two posts - MP and London Assembly member.
The Bethnal Green and Bow MP is top of Respect's list for the London-wide list, which is elected by a form of proportional representation.
He is losing his voice after talking "seven hours a day" from the top of his open-top bus which has been through all corners of London "at least twice".
He says it is important Respect wins a seat, if Boris Johnson is to be mayor.
The party is fielding 12 candidates and targeting one constituency seat, City and East, and says the response has been "very good".
Mr Galloway said he was looking forward to a result that will "surprise" the media.
'Important platform'
"The best result we can contemplate at the moment is winning the City and East constituency which is our heartland, and my election as top of the list," he said.
But he admits City and East could be difficult to win as it a geographically large seat with a varied electorate - taking in areas like the City of London and Barking and Dagenham - where the BNP hold 12 council seats.
Mr Livingstone intends to carry on as MP for Bethnal Green and Bow if he is elected to the assembly: "I would be doing two jobs for one salary, so the London taxpayer will gain from electing me."
"It's an important platform and I intend to do my best with it to fight for the interests of the people we represent, the working people, the poorest people, the minority communities who need a big voice in London."
The party is also fielding candidates in by-elections for Tower Hamlets council, and in councils in Manchester, Wigan, Birmingham, Bradford and Walsall.
"
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Tony Blair in his 'cushy cell' in hell must be laughing his head off at the descent of 'public debate' to the levels lower than Blair's own gutters...
Tony Blair must be laughing his head off as he engages his mates in the devils dungeon and regales them with his perfect evil plot to corrupt London
This must be because of the complete state of ‘treating as normal, almost acceptable’ sleaze and corruption in society that the mainstream media has now created. And got itself engaged in.
From the BBC to the ITV, from the Rupert Murdoched Times to the Rupert Murdoched Sun, from the ethnicity-linked sleaze-sheets to the ethnicity-linked sleaze tv channels, the entire ‘opinion, atmosphere’ of corrupt and corrupting hype around AND FOR the re-election of the corrupter of London, Ken Lyingstill Livingstone has been one of unprecedented descent of 'society' and 'societal institutions into the abyss of utter immorality and disgraceful departure from ethics and ethically.....
And there is absolutely no room for examining any of the liar Livingstone's evil records over the past 8 =years as the ‘Undone mayor’ at the expense of the people of London... In the name of the people of London...
This must be because of the complete state of ‘treating as normal, almost acceptable’ sleaze and corruption in society that the mainstream media has now created. And got itself engaged in.
From the BBC to the ITV, from the Rupert Murdoched Times to the Rupert Murdoched Sun, from the ethnicity-linked sleaze-sheets to the ethnicity-linked sleaze tv channels, the entire ‘opinion, atmosphere’ of corrupt and corrupting hype around AND FOR the re-election of the corrupter of London, Ken Lyingstill Livingstone has been one of unprecedented descent of 'society' and 'societal institutions into the abyss of utter immorality and disgraceful departure from ethics and ethically.....
And there is absolutely no room for examining any of the liar Livingstone's evil records over the past 8 =years as the ‘Undone mayor’ at the expense of the people of London... In the name of the people of London...
Monday, April 28, 2008
'Mainstream' Brit 'media' 'commentators' are echoing 4 years on, what Khoodeelaar! has been saying about the LIAR Ken Livingstone....
2158 Hrs GMT 2258 Hrs UKtime London Monday 28 April 2008:
Khoodeelaar! the ‘No to Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London’ CAMPAIGN ‘TOLD YOU SO’ - that is SAID IT ON THE RECORD - for more than 4 years now, that the key tout in London for Big Business Crossrail hole plot, the ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone, was, has been, is and will continue to be A LIAR....
If our description of the lying Ken Livingstone has been straight and open, some of the ‘mainstream’ ‘media’ confessions to knowing that Livingstone was a liar, are now making it very clear that the evidence is undeniable that Livingstone is untrustworthy, that he has lied, that he is unfit to deserve the mandate from the people of London for any extension of Livingstone's reign in the name of the people of London....
Khoodeelaar! is saying this on the day that Simon Jenkins, one of the most pervasive ’mainstream’ British ‘establishment’ ‘timeserving’ ‘commentators’ has himself admitted that Livingstone does not deserve to be trusted because he is a self-confessed liar......
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! the ‘No to Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London’ CAMPAIGN ‘TOLD YOU SO’ - that is SAID IT ON THE RECORD - for more than 4 years now, that the key tout in London for Big Business Crossrail hole plot, the ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone, was, has been, is and will continue to be A LIAR....
If our description of the lying Ken Livingstone has been straight and open, some of the ‘mainstream’ ‘media’ confessions to knowing that Livingstone was a liar, are now making it very clear that the evidence is undeniable that Livingstone is untrustworthy, that he has lied, that he is unfit to deserve the mandate from the people of London for any extension of Livingstone's reign in the name of the people of London....
Khoodeelaar! is saying this on the day that Simon Jenkins, one of the most pervasive ’mainstream’ British ‘establishment’ ‘timeserving’ ‘commentators’ has himself admitted that Livingstone does not deserve to be trusted because he is a self-confessed liar......
[To be continued]
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
How the BBC 'Breakfast' slot and the Polly-Toynbeed Guardian lied to cover up the poverty of Gordon Brown's imprudence..-1
Muhammad Haque ethical commentary 0750 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 22 April 2008:
On Gordon Brown, his Big Business agenda setters and how the Big Business plot is being propagated by both the BBC and the Guardian [allegedly 'edited' by Polly Toynbee],
But that would not be the view that would come across over at the BBC...
Especially if anyone who had just begun watching the BBC1 Breakfast programme on this same morning 22 April 2008. The BBC must have struck a deal with the evil plotters who are bent on deceiving the public about the post of mayor at the expense of London...
From the start, this was a very corrupt idea... It was not designed to let the people of London hold to account anyone in post in the peoples' name...
Neither the post of ‘mayor in the name of London’ nor the overly exaggerated and false ‘Greater London Assembly’ [GLA] could deliver any accountability... Even if the ‘legislation’ were different .........
On the matter of that package of legislation, I shall be commenting more later today [Tuesday 22 April 2008] and in the course of the next week or so.... I shall do so as part of the Khoodeelaar! Manifesto...... for the people of London.....
Back to the obscene, the ignorant, the untruthful package peddled this morning [22 April 2008] on the he BBC1 ‘Breakfast’ slot, they did an unprecedented [that word will soon be reviewed, on the evidence] touting for Ken Livingstone IN EFFECT although they kept their promotion of Ken Livingstone barely within the limits of propaganda ... and they did an equally unjustified and untruthful plug and touting for Big Business ‘City of London’...
They did it with words of such ignorance that in the context of the known facts so far, the scriptwriter/s of that package must have been criminally assigned to make the unrepresentative, corrupting post appear almost legitimate...
No, not just almost legitimate, make it look like fairy tale.. Not that their target viewers would be expected to treat it as fairy tale They would be expected to treat it as the real thing......
Just why are the BBC script-agenda-setters intent on lying so openly to the public? Is it, could it be, it must be connected with today’s Guardian front page [see, on the right of the page, immediately below this comment] which shows the true colour, the corrupting colour of the lying Guardian....
Early editions of today’s Guardian newspaper [Tuesday 22 April 2008] have carried a front page lead that ATTACks those MPs who are at least putting up a show of resisting Gordon Brown’s attacks on the low paid and the impoverished sections in the community....
On Gordon Brown, his Big Business agenda setters and how the Big Business plot is being propagated by both the BBC and the Guardian [allegedly 'edited' by Polly Toynbee],
But that would not be the view that would come across over at the BBC...
Especially if anyone who had just begun watching the BBC1 Breakfast programme on this same morning 22 April 2008. The BBC must have struck a deal with the evil plotters who are bent on deceiving the public about the post of mayor at the expense of London...
From the start, this was a very corrupt idea... It was not designed to let the people of London hold to account anyone in post in the peoples' name...
Neither the post of ‘mayor in the name of London’ nor the overly exaggerated and false ‘Greater London Assembly’ [GLA] could deliver any accountability... Even if the ‘legislation’ were different .........
On the matter of that package of legislation, I shall be commenting more later today [Tuesday 22 April 2008] and in the course of the next week or so.... I shall do so as part of the Khoodeelaar! Manifesto...... for the people of London.....
Back to the obscene, the ignorant, the untruthful package peddled this morning [22 April 2008] on the he BBC1 ‘Breakfast’ slot, they did an unprecedented [that word will soon be reviewed, on the evidence] touting for Ken Livingstone IN EFFECT although they kept their promotion of Ken Livingstone barely within the limits of propaganda ... and they did an equally unjustified and untruthful plug and touting for Big Business ‘City of London’...
They did it with words of such ignorance that in the context of the known facts so far, the scriptwriter/s of that package must have been criminally assigned to make the unrepresentative, corrupting post appear almost legitimate...
No, not just almost legitimate, make it look like fairy tale.. Not that their target viewers would be expected to treat it as fairy tale They would be expected to treat it as the real thing......
Just why are the BBC script-agenda-setters intent on lying so openly to the public? Is it, could it be, it must be connected with today’s Guardian front page [see, on the right of the page, immediately below this comment] which shows the true colour, the corrupting colour of the lying Guardian....
Early editions of today’s Guardian newspaper [Tuesday 22 April 2008] have carried a front page lead that ATTACks those MPs who are at least putting up a show of resisting Gordon Brown’s attacks on the low paid and the impoverished sections in the community....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![Khoodeelaar! constitutional law campaign against the 'Crossrail Bill' [a Bill in UK Parliament]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pSmwp9aFK8U/SGqe5VQwLHI/AAAAAAAABfc/MEjjMWby2dc/S226/Khoodeelaar!+try+this+logo.gif)
![London [Rupert Murdoched] Times, Wed. 7 May 2008](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitiFRN6uO_MOdYMby0s7ow2zcBaewOKfl3k4QdCPcahu1IKXx6sl7Gs4aO9VrAhN8gQJvYb1a2JnODsTUsMks_LtoZVuqc64whMkMitNKVz1bijPST853uNwRNG8x2PVFl1kqRez8M3b-j/s226/1676149.jpg)
